{"schema_version":"1.0","id":"Barkley-2097","alternate_ids":[],"catalogue_id":"barkley-2097","name":"Rosanna Barkley","canonical_url":"https://glasgow.phenotype.dev/people/barkley-2097.html","json_url":"https://glasgow.phenotype.dev/people/barkley-2097.json","network_url":"https://glasgow.phenotype.dev/people/barkley-2097.network.json","wikitree_url":"https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Barkley-2097","vitals":{"birth":{"date":"c. 1810","place":"Ballymena, Ireland","status":"estimated"},"death":{"date":null,"place":null,"status":null}},"identity":{"gender":"Female","occupations":[],"locations":["Ballymena, Ireland","Tyanee townland"],"aliases":[],"research_clusters":["Unassigned occurrence"]},"relationships":{"parents":[{"id":"Barkley-2098","name":"Henry Barkley","relationship":"father","status":"unknown","status_label":"WikiTree tree relationship","basis":"tree","evidence_ids":[],"tree_relationship":true,"relationship_source":"wikitree_parent_field","tree_status":"unmarked","tree_status_label":"WikiTree: relationship status unmarked","url":null,"json_url":null,"network_url":null,"wikitree_url":"https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Barkley-2098","claim_id":"C-3099f84c8b0b"}],"spouses":[{"id":"Glasgow-1623","name":"James Glasgow","relationship":"spouse","status":"unknown","status_label":"WikiTree tree relationship","basis":"tree","evidence_ids":[],"tree_relationship":true,"relationship_source":"wikitree_spouse_field","tree_status":"unmarked","tree_status_label":"WikiTree: relationship status unmarked","url":"/people/glasgow-1623.html","json_url":"/people/glasgow-1623.json","network_url":"/people/glasgow-1623.network.json","wikitree_url":"https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Glasgow-1623","claim_id":"C-0c3095b02508"}],"children":[],"siblings":[]},"claims":[{"id":"C-bb5a02b4710b","type":"recorded_occurrence","subject_ids":["Barkley-2097"],"claim":"Rosanna Barkley was recorded in Tyanee townland (17 Mar 1851).","status":"proved","status_label":"Documented","evidence_ids":["E-bb5a02b4710b"],"notes":"Marriage: farm servant, about 25; father Henry Barkley","provenance":"mapped_record"},{"id":"C-3099f84c8b0b","type":"tree_relationship","subject_ids":["Barkley-2097","Barkley-2098"],"claim":"WikiTree currently connects Rosanna Barkley and Henry Barkley as father.","status":"unknown","status_label":"WikiTree tree relationship","evidence_ids":[],"notes":"Tree structure only; no documentary conclusion is implied.","provenance":"wikitree_parent_field"},{"id":"C-0c3095b02508","type":"tree_relationship","subject_ids":["Barkley-2097","Glasgow-1623"],"claim":"WikiTree currently connects Rosanna Barkley and James Glasgow as spouse.","status":"unknown","status_label":"WikiTree tree relationship","evidence_ids":[],"notes":"Tree structure only; no documentary conclusion is implied.","provenance":"wikitree_spouse_field"}],"evidence":[{"id":"E-21c7ed8c1437","claim_ids":[],"record_type":"extracted citation","date":null,"place":null,"subjects":["Barkley-2097"],"assertion":"Citation extracted from the WikiTree profile; its underlying record has not been interpreted here.","evidence_status":"unassessed","source_quality":"derivative","independence_group":"SRC-46e12e6853c0","source":{"title":"https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:QGVD-7HCP","repository":null,"reference":null,"url":"https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:QGVD-7HCP"},"provenance":"wikitree_profile_citation"},{"id":"E-bb5a02b4710b","claim_ids":["C-bb5a02b4710b"],"record_type":"Marriage: farm servant, about 25; father Henry Barkley","date":"17 Mar 1851","place":"Tyanee townland","subjects":["Barkley-2097"],"assertion":"Original register records Rosanna of Tyanee marrying James Glasgow of Inishrush; her identity and occupation match the 1847 report.","evidence_status":"direct","source_quality":"tree_only","independence_group":"SRC-dc903d8cf48d","source":{"title":"WikiTree profile export for Barkley-2097","repository":null,"reference":"3c926ab319c8810c","url":"https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Barkley-2097"},"provenance":"profile-provenance"}],"open_questions":[{"id":"Q-7801cb0a547f","question":"Which records prove the subject's identity across events?","status":"unresolved","current_conclusion":null,"claim_ids":[],"evidence_for":[],"evidence_against":[],"missing_bridge":null,"lead_ids":[],"provenance":"research/Barkley-2097/research_plan.json"},{"id":"Q-5f284b28111b","question":"Which original or indexed records identify the parents?","status":"unresolved","current_conclusion":null,"claim_ids":[],"evidence_for":[],"evidence_against":[],"missing_bridge":"A contemporary record explicitly identifying the parent or parents.","lead_ids":[],"provenance":"research/Barkley-2097/research_plan.json"},{"id":"Q-9e3c86cfc435","question":"Which spouses and children are directly supported by records?","status":"unresolved","current_conclusion":null,"claim_ids":[],"evidence_for":[],"evidence_against":[],"missing_bridge":null,"lead_ids":[],"provenance":"research/Barkley-2097/research_plan.json"},{"id":"Q-44a1462c672d","question":"What conflicts or same-name conflations must be resolved?","status":"unresolved","current_conclusion":null,"claim_ids":[],"evidence_for":[],"evidence_against":[],"missing_bridge":null,"lead_ids":[],"provenance":"research/Barkley-2097/research_plan.json"}],"research_leads":[],"source_summary":[{"title":"https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:QGVD-7HCP","url":"https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:QGVD-7HCP","source_quality":"derivative","independence_group":"SRC-46e12e6853c0","provenance":"wikitree_profile_citation"},{"title":"WikiTree profile export for Barkley-2097","url":"https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Barkley-2097","source_quality":"tree_only","independence_group":"SRC-dc903d8cf48d","provenance":"profile-provenance"}],"warnings":["2 parent references point outside the current export."],"provenance":{"tree":"WikiTree One-Tree export","mapped_records":"Glasgow Surname Project map dataset","profile_capture":"Public WikiTree profile evidence capture","relationship_assessments":"Controlled local relationship hypothesis register","research_findings":"Durable research/<profile-or-catalogue-ID>/findings.md case file"},"research_findings":[{"profile_id":"Barkley-2097","updated":null,"source_path":"research/Barkley-2097/findings.md","sections":[{"title":"Current conclusion","category":"conclusion","markdown":"Rosanna's original marriage entry identifies her as a farm servant of Tyanee,\ndaughter of farmer Henry Barkley, and gives her age as about 25 on 17 March\n1851. Her estimated birth should therefore be about 1825/26, not about 1810."},{"title":"Source findings","category":"sources","markdown":"| Source | Finding | Assessment |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| [IrishGenealogy marriage record](https://www.irishgenealogy.ie/view/?record_id=cima-3208068) and [original register](../Glasgow-1622/sources/irishgenealogy_1851_james_glasgow_rosanna_barkley_marriage.pdf) | On 17 March 1851 Rosanna Barkley, about 25, spinster and farm servant of Tyanee, daughter of Henry Barkley, farmer, married James Glasgow of Inishrush. | Direct identity, father, age, occupation, residence and marriage evidence. |\n| [John Glasgow letter, 20 March 1847](https://www.hiltner.com/mckeown/documents/John%20Glasgow%20letter%20to%20Jane%20Glasgow%20Gray%203-20-1847.pdf) | The writer relayed a report that James Glasgow had a child by his servant, an unnamed daughter of Henry Barkly. | Rosanna's 1851 identity and occupation make her the strongest identification of that unnamed woman, but the letter is hearsay and the child remains unidentified. |"},{"title":"WikiTree correction","category":"actions","markdown":"Change the estimated birth from about 1810 to **about 1825** (uncertain) and cite\nthe original marriage register. Do not create or attach the pre-1847 child until\na baptism, maintenance, session or later parent record identifies the child."}]}],"similar_people":[],"potential_parentage":{"children_recorded":[],"earliest_dated_son":null,"earliest_dated_daughter":null,"second_dated_son":null,"second_dated_daughter":null,"third_dated_son":null,"third_dated_daughter":null,"naming_controls":{"matches":0,"mismatches":0,"factor":1.0,"details":[]},"candidates":[],"method":"Automated leads use birth surnames—not married surnames—as parental eligibility, role-specific biological age limits, bounded and approximate-date uncertainty, household chronology, specific time-aware localities, mapped distance, tenancy succession, migration destinations and sex-aware Scottish naming positions across generations. People already attached as the subject's parents stay in the identity summary and are excluded from this alternative-candidate list, regardless of relationship confidence. The main calibration uses clues available on disconnected profiles; existing parent and sibling links are retained as comparison context rather than treated as transferable evidence. Common ordered names and grandparent-to-child echoes receive a small non-zero weight, so a John or James match can support several independent criteria without producing a lead alone. Rare names, repeated bearers and bundles across otherwise distinct branches receive substantially more weight according to catalogue frequency. An exact migration place is weighted by its rarity and repetition across both branches; a shared destination country is worth only one point. Extra weight is added only when at least three independent clue types converge: naming, locality, specific migration, household chronology or collateral networks. Sparse profiles retain a clearly labelled chronology-only fallback instead of disappearing. Countries, states, counties and research clusters do not count as a shared locality, and fallback, broad representative or kin-inferred coordinates are excluded from distance scoring. Shared descendant profiles are removed before branch-name comparison. A candidate already recorded as a parent-in-law is excluded. A confident or independently supported parent is treated as settled; uncertain and unassessed attachments remain open to alternative comparison. A different linked parent, an uncle/aunt or grandparent path, and a matching existing child profile prevent an alternative from being classified as a strong direct-parent lead until the underlying tree conflict or duplicate is resolved. Familiar forms such as Bessie are normalised. Surname remains an eligibility filter worth zero points.","warning":"Naming customs, shared farms and occupations are circumstantial. Children, spouses and collateral relatives may be missing, and tree-derived family networks are not independent evidence. Scores rank research leads; they do not prove parentage."}}