{"schema_version":"1.0","id":"Crawford-30330","alternate_ids":[],"catalogue_id":"crawford-30330","name":"Elizabeth Gold","canonical_url":"https://glasgow.phenotype.dev/people/crawford-30330.html","json_url":"https://glasgow.phenotype.dev/people/crawford-30330.json","network_url":"https://glasgow.phenotype.dev/people/crawford-30330.network.json","wikitree_url":"https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Crawford-30330","vitals":{"birth":{"date":"1756-05-02","place":"Renfrew, Renfrewshire, Scotland","status":"exact"},"death":{"date":"after 1781","place":"Douglas, Lanarkshire, Scotland","status":"uncertain"}},"identity":{"gender":"Female","occupations":[],"locations":["Renfrew, Renfrewshire, Scotland","Douglas, Lanarkshire, Scotland"],"aliases":[],"research_clusters":[]},"relationships":{"parents":[],"spouses":[{"id":"Gold-2231","name":"James Gold","relationship":"spouse","status":"unknown","status_label":"WikiTree tree relationship","basis":"tree","evidence_ids":[],"tree_relationship":true,"relationship_source":"wikitree_spouse_field","tree_status":"unmarked","tree_status_label":"WikiTree: relationship status unmarked","url":"/people/gold-2231.html","json_url":"/people/gold-2231.json","network_url":"/people/gold-2231.network.json","wikitree_url":"https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Gold-2231","claim_id":"C-2afcdd5fd6bb"},{"id":"Guil-34","name":"James Guil","relationship":"spouse","status":"unknown","status_label":"WikiTree tree relationship","basis":"tree","evidence_ids":[],"tree_relationship":true,"relationship_source":"wikitree_spouse_field","tree_status":"unmarked","tree_status_label":"WikiTree: relationship status unmarked","url":null,"json_url":null,"network_url":null,"wikitree_url":"https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Guil-34","claim_id":"C-af8a99ed9d05"}],"children":[],"siblings":[]},"claims":[{"id":"C-2afcdd5fd6bb","type":"tree_relationship","subject_ids":["Crawford-30330","Gold-2231"],"claim":"WikiTree currently connects Elizabeth Gold and James Gold as spouse.","status":"unknown","status_label":"WikiTree tree relationship","evidence_ids":[],"notes":"Tree structure only; no documentary conclusion is implied.","provenance":"wikitree_spouse_field"},{"id":"C-af8a99ed9d05","type":"tree_relationship","subject_ids":["Crawford-30330","Guil-34"],"claim":"WikiTree currently connects Elizabeth Gold and James Guil as spouse.","status":"unknown","status_label":"WikiTree tree relationship","evidence_ids":[],"notes":"Tree structure only; no documentary conclusion is implied.","provenance":"wikitree_spouse_field"}],"evidence":[{"id":"E-9091da16159b","claim_ids":[],"record_type":"extracted citation","date":null,"place":null,"subjects":["Crawford-30330"],"assertion":"Citation extracted from the WikiTree profile; its underlying record has not been interpreted here.","evidence_status":"unassessed","source_quality":"unknown","independence_group":"SRC-c281211df7ae","source":{"title":"Baptism:\n\"Scotland, Births and Baptisms, 1564-1950\" \nciting Digital film/folder number: 007908599; FHL microfilm: 1041326 \n (accessed 26 September 2025)","repository":null,"reference":null,"url":null},"provenance":"wikitree_profile_citation"}],"open_questions":[{"id":"Q-75cf6aaadf8a","question":"Which records prove the subject's identity across events?","status":"unresolved","current_conclusion":null,"claim_ids":[],"evidence_for":[],"evidence_against":[],"missing_bridge":null,"lead_ids":[],"provenance":"research/Crawford-30330/research_plan.json"},{"id":"Q-b9637d7ffccd","question":"Which original or indexed records identify the parents?","status":"unresolved","current_conclusion":null,"claim_ids":[],"evidence_for":[],"evidence_against":[],"missing_bridge":"A contemporary record explicitly identifying the parent or parents.","lead_ids":[],"provenance":"research/Crawford-30330/research_plan.json"},{"id":"Q-2c908ca76c0d","question":"Which spouses and children are directly supported by records?","status":"unresolved","current_conclusion":null,"claim_ids":[],"evidence_for":[],"evidence_against":[],"missing_bridge":null,"lead_ids":[],"provenance":"research/Crawford-30330/research_plan.json"},{"id":"Q-415c736ec7fa","question":"What conflicts or same-name conflations must be resolved?","status":"unresolved","current_conclusion":null,"claim_ids":[],"evidence_for":[],"evidence_against":[],"missing_bridge":null,"lead_ids":[],"provenance":"research/Crawford-30330/research_plan.json"}],"research_leads":[],"source_summary":[{"title":"Baptism:\n\"Scotland, Births and Baptisms, 1564-1950\" \nciting Digital film/folder number: 007908599; FHL microfilm: 1041326 \n (accessed 26 September 2025)","url":null,"source_quality":"unknown","independence_group":"SRC-c281211df7ae","provenance":"wikitree_profile_citation"}],"warnings":[],"provenance":{"tree":"WikiTree One-Tree export","mapped_records":"Glasgow Surname Project map dataset","profile_capture":"Public WikiTree profile evidence capture","relationship_assessments":"Controlled local relationship hypothesis register","research_findings":"Durable research/<profile-or-catalogue-ID>/findings.md case file"},"research_findings":[{"profile_id":"Crawford-30330","updated":null,"source_path":"research/Crawford-30330/findings.md","sections":[{"title":"Current conclusion","category":"conclusion","markdown":"The 2 May 1756 Renfrew baptism explicitly names Andrew Crauford and Margaret\nMaxwell as parents. The parental names are proved for that child, but the\nrecord has not been connected independently to the Elizabeth who married\nJames Gold/Guil. Hold both WikiTree parent links."},{"title":"Source findings","category":"sources","markdown":"- FamilySearch record [`VQWR-4VM`](https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:VQWR-4VM): Elisabeth Crauford, baptised 2 May 1756 at Renfrew; parents Andrew Crauford and Margaret Maxwell. Image unavailable; digital folder `007908599`, microfilm `1041326`, batch `C11575-4`.\n- FamilySearch PID [`MQ63-DDN`](https://www.familysearch.org/tree/person/details/MQ63-DDN) has no spouse or children and is flagged with possible duplicate Elizabeth Crawford profiles. It attaches Andrew [`KC7N-6HC`](https://www.familysearch.org/tree/person/details/KC7N-6HC) and Margaret [`KZ6K-FV8`](https://www.familysearch.org/tree/person/details/KZ6K-FV8); both parent PIDs also have multiple possible-duplicate warnings and no dated vital event.\n- Broad WikiTree searches returned 349 Andrew Crawford and 1,409 Margaret Maxwell matches. Narrow searches around 1728/1732 and Renfrew returned none, so no compatible existing parent profile was established."},{"title":"Parentage assessment","category":"assessment","markdown":"**Hold:** do not create or attach Andrew and Margaret until a marriage, child\nbaptism, or other record connects the Renfrew child to Elizabeth's Gold/Guil\nfamily and the FamilySearch duplicate cluster is resolved.\n\nThis is nevertheless a newly identified parent set for the 1756 record child;\nit is included in the ten-set root register with its endpoint-continuity hold\nstated explicitly, not presented as a live attachment recommendation."}]}],"similar_people":[],"potential_parentage":{"children_recorded":[],"earliest_dated_son":null,"earliest_dated_daughter":null,"second_dated_son":null,"second_dated_daughter":null,"third_dated_son":null,"third_dated_daughter":null,"naming_controls":{"matches":0,"mismatches":0,"factor":1.0,"details":[]},"candidates":[],"method":"Automated leads use birth surnames—not married surnames—as parental eligibility, role-specific biological age limits, bounded and approximate-date uncertainty, household chronology, specific time-aware localities, mapped distance, tenancy succession, migration destinations and sex-aware Scottish naming positions across generations. People already attached as the subject's parents stay in the identity summary and are excluded from this alternative-candidate list, regardless of relationship confidence. The main calibration uses clues available on disconnected profiles; existing parent and sibling links are retained as comparison context rather than treated as transferable evidence. Common ordered names and grandparent-to-child echoes receive a small non-zero weight, so a John or James match can support several independent criteria without producing a lead alone. Rare names, repeated bearers and bundles across otherwise distinct branches receive substantially more weight according to catalogue frequency. An exact migration place is weighted by its rarity and repetition across both branches; a shared destination country is worth only one point. Extra weight is added only when at least three independent clue types converge: naming, locality, specific migration, household chronology or collateral networks. Sparse profiles retain a clearly labelled chronology-only fallback instead of disappearing. Countries, states, counties and research clusters do not count as a shared locality, and fallback, broad representative or kin-inferred coordinates are excluded from distance scoring. Shared descendant profiles are removed before branch-name comparison. A candidate already recorded as a parent-in-law is excluded. A confident or independently supported parent is treated as settled; uncertain and unassessed attachments remain open to alternative comparison. A different linked parent, an uncle/aunt or grandparent path, and a matching existing child profile prevent an alternative from being classified as a strong direct-parent lead until the underlying tree conflict or duplicate is resolved. Familiar forms such as Bessie are normalised. Surname remains an eligibility filter worth zero points.","warning":"Naming customs, shared farms and occupations are circumstantial. Children, spouses and collateral relatives may be missing, and tree-derived family networks are not independent evidence. Scores rank research leads; they do not prove parentage."},"presentation":{"version":"21","position":{"answer":"The 2 May 1756 Renfrew baptism explicitly names Andrew Crauford and Margaret Maxwell as parents. The parental names are proved for that child, but the record has not been connected independently to the Elizabeth who married James Gold/Guil. Hold both WikiTree parent links.","points":[]},"opening":"The 2 May 1756 Renfrew baptism explicitly names Andrew Crauford and Margaret Maxwell as parents. The parental names are proved for that child, but the record has not been connected independently to the Elizabeth who married James Gold/Guil. Hold both WikiTree parent links.","assessment_date":"","resolution":{"state":"resolved","basis":["maintained Current conclusion finding"],"issues":[],"source_ids":["research/Crawford-30330/findings.md"]},"record_associations":[],"vitals":{"birth":{"date":"1756-05-02","place":"Renfrew, Renfrewshire, Scotland","status":"exact"},"death":{"date":"after 1781","place":"Douglas, Lanarkshire, Scotland","status":"uncertain"}},"relationships":{"parents":[],"spouses":[{"id":"Gold-2231","name":"James Gold","relationship":"spouse","status":"unknown","status_label":"WikiTree tree relationship","basis":"tree","evidence_ids":[],"tree_relationship":true,"relationship_source":"wikitree_spouse_field","tree_status":"unmarked","tree_status_label":"WikiTree: relationship status unmarked","url":"/people/gold-2231.html","json_url":"/people/gold-2231.json","network_url":"/people/gold-2231.network.json","wikitree_url":"https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Gold-2231","claim_id":"C-2afcdd5fd6bb"},{"id":"Guil-34","name":"James Guil","relationship":"spouse","status":"unknown","status_label":"WikiTree tree relationship","basis":"tree","evidence_ids":[],"tree_relationship":true,"relationship_source":"wikitree_spouse_field","tree_status":"unmarked","tree_status_label":"WikiTree: relationship status unmarked","url":null,"json_url":null,"network_url":null,"wikitree_url":"https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Guil-34","claim_id":"C-af8a99ed9d05"}],"children":[],"siblings":[]}}}