{"schema_version":"1.0","id":"record-henry-glads-duneane-1740","alternate_ids":[],"catalogue_id":"record-henry-glads-duneane-1740","name":"Henry Glads","canonical_url":"https://glasgow.phenotype.dev/people/record-henry-glads-duneane-1740.html","json_url":"https://glasgow.phenotype.dev/people/record-henry-glads-duneane-1740.json","network_url":"https://glasgow.phenotype.dev/people/record-henry-glads-duneane-1740.network.json","wikitree_url":null,"vitals":{"birth":{"date":"c. 1722 (estimated)","place":"Duneane civil parish (estimated)","status":"estimated"},"death":{"date":null,"place":null,"status":null}},"identity":{"gender":"Male","occupations":[],"locations":["Duneane civil parish (estimated)","Duneane civil parish"],"aliases":[],"research_clusters":["Western County Antrim ruling-elder cluster"]},"relationships":{"parents":[],"spouses":[],"children":[],"siblings":[]},"claims":[{"id":"C-433c317d2a49","type":"recorded_occurrence","subject_ids":["record-henry-glads-duneane-1740"],"claim":"Henry Glads was recorded in Duneane civil parish (1740).","status":"proved","status_label":"Documented occurrence; surname identity unresolved","evidence_ids":["E-433c317d2a49"],"notes":"Protestant householder in Duneane","provenance":"mapped_record"}],"evidence":[{"id":"E-433c317d2a49","claim_ids":["C-433c317d2a49"],"record_type":"Protestant householder in Duneane","date":"1740","place":"Duneane civil parish","subjects":["record-henry-glads-duneane-1740"],"assertion":"The unusual Glads spelling is worth pursuing but no record identifies Henry as a Glasgow or relates him to James-3967.","evidence_status":"direct","source_quality":"derivative","independence_group":"SRC-4fb91b4fe9e5","source":{"title":"1740 County Antrim Protestant Householders' Return: Henry Glads, Duneane","repository":null,"reference":"5361503fd904d962","url":"https://www.billmacafee.com/1740returns/1740protestantreturnsantrim.pdf"},"provenance":"householders-transcription"}],"open_questions":[],"research_leads":[],"source_summary":[{"title":"1740 County Antrim Protestant Householders' Return: Henry Glads, Duneane","url":"https://www.billmacafee.com/1740returns/1740protestantreturnsantrim.pdf","source_quality":"derivative","independence_group":"SRC-4fb91b4fe9e5","provenance":"householders-transcription"}],"warnings":[],"provenance":{"tree":"WikiTree One-Tree export","mapped_records":"Glasgow Surname Project map dataset","profile_capture":"Public WikiTree profile evidence capture","relationship_assessments":"Controlled local relationship hypothesis register"},"research_findings":[],"similar_people":[],"potential_parentage":{"children_recorded":[],"earliest_dated_son":null,"earliest_dated_daughter":null,"second_dated_son":null,"second_dated_daughter":null,"third_dated_son":null,"third_dated_daughter":null,"naming_controls":{"matches":0,"mismatches":0,"factor":1.0,"details":[]},"candidates":[],"method":"Automated leads use birth surnames—not married surnames—as parental eligibility, role-specific biological age limits, bounded and approximate-date uncertainty, household chronology, specific time-aware localities, mapped distance, tenancy succession, migration destinations and sex-aware Scottish naming positions across generations. People already attached as the subject's parents stay in the identity summary and are excluded from this alternative-candidate list, regardless of relationship confidence. The main calibration uses clues available on disconnected profiles; existing parent and sibling links are retained as comparison context rather than treated as transferable evidence. Common ordered names and grandparent-to-child echoes receive a small non-zero weight, so a John or James match can support several independent criteria without producing a lead alone. Rare names, repeated bearers and bundles across otherwise distinct branches receive substantially more weight according to catalogue frequency. An exact migration place is weighted by its rarity and repetition across both branches; a shared destination country is worth only one point. Extra weight is added only when at least three independent clue types converge: naming, locality, specific migration, household chronology or collateral networks. Sparse profiles retain a clearly labelled chronology-only fallback instead of disappearing. Countries, states, counties and research clusters do not count as a shared locality, and fallback, broad representative or kin-inferred coordinates are excluded from distance scoring. Shared descendant profiles are removed before branch-name comparison. A candidate already recorded as a parent-in-law is excluded. A confident or independently supported parent is treated as settled; uncertain and unassessed attachments remain open to alternative comparison. A different linked parent, an uncle/aunt or grandparent path, and a matching existing child profile prevent an alternative from being classified as a strong direct-parent lead until the underlying tree conflict or duplicate is resolved. Familiar forms such as Bessie are normalised. Surname remains an eligibility filter worth zero points.","warning":"Naming customs, shared farms and occupations are circumstantial. Children, spouses and collateral relatives may be missing, and tree-derived family networks are not independent evidence. Scores rank research leads; they do not prove parentage."},"profile_creation":{"status":"do_not_create","identity_note":"The 1740 Duneane return names Henry Glads, a distinct documentary occurrence. The inspected Larne armorial-stone page identifies Hugh Glasgow (Glasgow-1503), wife Ann and their later family; it does not identify Henry as Hugh or as a Glasgow. Preserve Henry's recorded form as an unresolved surname-context occurrence, without linking, merging or amending a person profile.","draft_path":"surname-research/free-space-pages/Glasgow_Branches_In_Early_Ireland.md","draft_wikitext":"The original 1766 religious return materially extends this cluster. At Drumearn it lists two separate men as ''Jas. Glasgo'', followed by ''Jn. Glasgo''; at Gortein it lists ''Sam Glasgo''; and at Killycurry it lists ''Wm Glasgo''.<ref name=\"Derryloran1766\">National Archives of Ireland, Parliamentary Return 665, 1766 religious census for Derryloran, IHP/1/665, [https://virtualtreasury.ie/item/NAI-IHP-1-665 original return], accessed 17 July 2026; [https://by2022-prod.adaptcentre.ie/loris/RCBL_23_162.JPG/full/full/0/default.jpg RCB Library MS 23 transcript, pp. 162-163].</ref> This gives five definite Glasgow households across three Derryloran townlands in 1766. It supports a substantial local population and narrows later identity searches, but the return gives no ages or relationships and does not map a named profile to a particular householder.\n\nThe 1766 John Glasgoe at Edernagh belongs to Artrea parish.<ref>National Archives of Ireland, Parliamentary Return 650, 1766 religious census for Artrea, IHP/1/650, [https://virtualtreasury.ie/item/NAI-IHP-1-650 Virtual Record Treasury of Ireland], accessed 17 July 2026.</ref> Samuel Glasgoe at Whitehill and James Glasgow at Corvanaghan belong to the separate adjacent parish of Kildress.<ref name=\"Kildress1766\">National Archives of Ireland, Parliamentary Return 667, 1766 religious census for Kildress, IHP/1/667, [https://virtualtreasury.ie/item/NAI-IHP-1-667 original return], accessed 17 July 2026; [https://by2022-prod.adaptcentre.ie/loris/RCBL_23_176.JPG/full/full/0/default.jpg RCB Library MS 23 transcript, p. 176].</ref> Keep both parishes separate from Derryloran unless a later record connects them.\n\nThe St Luran register supplies the first proved nuclear family within the later Derryloran sequence: James Glasgow, son of William and Mary, was baptised on 21 August 1799.<ref name=\"Derryloran1799\">Representative Church Body Library, ''Derryloran Parish Register, Volume 1'', [https://www.churchofireland.org/cmsfiles/pdf/AboutUs/library/AngRecord/DerryloranVol1.pdf#page=11 published transcription, p. 3], accessed 17 July 2026.</ref> [[Glasgow-1702|James Glasgow (c.1799), later of Ballynasollus]], is a strong identity candidate because his marriage names his father as William and his death age also indicates birth about 1799. The baptism supplies no abode, however, and does not name the attached Margaret Mitchell; retain the identity as probable until another record supplies Mary or a locality bridge.","creation_allowed":false},"presentation":{"version":"21","assessment_date":"2026-09-13","principal_locality":"Lisnagaver, Rasharkin parish","principal_locality_href":"/branches/lisnagaver-rasharkin/","opening":"Alexander was a farmer at Lisnagaver, Rasharkin, born about 1811 in County Antrim according to the 1851 census. Repeated baptisms and the census document his wife Mary/Molly McAughin/McAughern and their family. Both children named James and the unnamed 1838 child are kept distinct and have documented parent relationships. Alexander's parents remain unresolved: older Alexander and Rosanna are working candidates, not proved parents. Thomas and Daniel are documented brothers; whether Alexander was their brother or cousin is still open. The Gortahar death on 16 May 1888 is the leading identification, with a conflicting age and an unresolved daughter-informant identification.","position":{"answer":"Alexander’s identity in the Lisnagaver family is well supported; his parentage remains unresolved.","points":["Maintained: birth about 1811 in County Antrim, estimated from the 1851 census.","Maintained: the Gortahar death on 16 May 1888 is the leading identification, with an age discrepancy and unresolved Nancy/Ann identity.","Documented family: wife Mary/Molly McAughin/McAughern and children Robert, Mary, Ann, both children named James, and the unnamed 1838 child.","Working hypothesis only: older Alexander and Rosanna as parents. The February 2020 reported autosomal connection to a Thomas descendant is a test route, not proof."]},"evidence_questions":[{"id":"identity","title":"What establishes Alexander’s identity and approximate dates?","answer":"The 1851 Lisnagaver household is the anchor identity. The 1888 Gortahar death is the leading later-life match, but the two age statements do not agree.","records":["census-1851","death-alexander-1888","tithe-1834","valuation-1863-1878"],"reasoning":"The census supplies age, birthplace, occupation, residence and household members. The death register supplies a later place, marital status and daughter informant; the Lisnagaver land sequence and family marriages provide continuity between the records.","limitation":"The tithe and valuation entries name occupiers but do not identify an age or prove that every entry is the same Alexander. The 1888 age implies an earlier birth than the census.","missing":"An original record linking the 1851 farmer to the Gortahar death, or a record resolving the conflicting ages and informant relationship."},{"id":"family","title":"Which records establish his partner and children?","answer":"Rasharkin baptisms, the 1851 household and later civil marriages form a coherent family with Mary/Molly McCaughan. They do not justify merging the two James profiles or supplying a name for the 1838 child.","records":["baptism-james-1837","baptism-unnamed-1838","baptism-james-1843","census-1851","marriage-robert-1866","marriage-mary-1871","marriage-ann-1876"],"reasoning":"The baptism entries name Alex/Alexander and Mary/Molly at Gortereagh and Lisnagaver; the census places Mary and several children in one household; later marriages independently name Alexander as father of Robert, Mary and Ann.","limitation":"The marriage of Alexander and Mary has not been located. The 1838 transcription is unnamed, and the first James may have died before the reused name appears in 1843. Tree attachment alone does not establish every relationship.","missing":"An onsite or ordered copy of the original 1838 baptism page, the marriage or session record for Alexander and Mary, and records explaining the first James and unnamed child."},{"id":"parents","title":"What is actually known about his parents?","answer":"No inspected contemporary record names Alexander’s parents. Older Alexander and Rosanna remain the maintained working hypothesis, while the imported Robert/Catherine attachment is not established.","records":["tithe-1834"],"related_question":{"href":"#question-thomas-network","label":"Thomas–Daniel proof: will, marriage and the missing Alexander link"},"record_references":[{"record_id":"will-daniel-1871","question_id":"thomas-network"},{"record_id":"marriage-daniel-neely-1888","question_id":"thomas-network"}],"reasoning":"The late tradition gives a specific proposed parent pair for Thomas and the local records place Alexander near Thomas and Daniel. That makes the hypothesis worth testing, but locality and a later tradition do not supply Alexander’s missing parentage link.","limitation":"The only further provenance found is a 2018 FamilySearch Pedigree Resource File citing an Ancestry member tree; it gives a conflicting Rosanna death date and no historical source. The 1834 occupiers and later neighbouring farms do not state kinship; the John Glasgow Bible family is a nearby comparison, not a proved alternative parentage.","missing":"Kilraughts family or society material, the source provenance for Rosanna’s name and death date, or another contemporary record naming Alexander’s father or parents."},{"id":"thomas-network","title":"How is Alexander connected to Thomas and Daniel?","answer":"Daniel’s will identifies Thomas as his brother, and Daniel Neely Glasgow’s marriage identifies Thomas as his father. This establishes the Thomas–Daniel family network, not Alexander’s relationship to it.","records":["will-daniel-1871","marriage-daniel-neely-1888","census-1851","correspondence-thomas-2020"],"reasoning":"Daniel’s will calls Thomas his late brother and names nephew Daniel Neely Glasgow. The 1888 marriage identifies Daniel Neely as the son of Thomas, a farmer, and connects him to Lisnagaver. The distinctive full name, father’s name and local family context identify the nephew with Thomas’s son; this is more than two occurrences of the common name Thomas. That chain identifies the relevant Thomas and establishes Daniel’s brotherhood. Neither record names Alexander as their brother or identifies the brothers’ parents.","limitation":"Neither record calls Alexander a brother. The correspondence is a private, public-safe summary of a reported autosomal match; match metrics, pedigree and the source behind the parent names remain unavailable.","missing":"The underlying match data and pedigree, the original source for the parent tradition, and a record explicitly connecting Alexander to Thomas or Daniel."},{"id":"dna","title":"What does the DNA evidence add, and what does it leave unresolved?","answer":"The public-safe evidence supports targeted branch testing, not a parent assignment. The reported 2020 autosomal connection to a Thomas descendant is the most direct route for testing the family relationship; Y-DNA comparisons are a separate paternal-line experiment.","records":["correspondence-thomas-2020"],"reasoning":"A genuine match with a documented Thomas descent could support a relationship between Alexander’s and Thomas’s branches after alternative shared ancestry is checked. Public Y-DNA branch comparisons can test whether documented male lines share a recent paternal ancestor.","limitation":"No private match metrics, segment data or complete pedigree are published here. Neither an autosomal match nor a shared Y-DNA branch alone distinguishes brothers from cousins or identifies both parents.","missing":"Match amount/segments and pedigree provenance, plus a suitably documented male-line tester for the proposed comparison."}],"record_evidence":{"identity":{"census-1851":{"recorded_statement":"The return records Alexander, aged 40, born in County Antrim, a farmer and head of Lisnagaver house 35 with Mary and children Robert, James and Ann.","relevance":"The combination of age, birthplace, occupation, residence and household makes this the principal identity anchor for the later records.","limitation":"The return does not name his parents, and it does not by itself prove that every later Alexander Glasgow entry is the same man."},"death-alexander-1888":{"recorded_statement":"The civil register records a married labourer named Alexander Glasgow, aged 84, dying at Gortahar on 16 May 1888; daughter Nancy was present.","relevance":"Gortahar and the later family network make this the leading death identification for the Lisnagaver Alexander.","limitation":"The recorded age implies an earlier birth than the 1851 census, and Nancy has not been proved identical to one of the documented children."},"tithe-1834":{"recorded_statement":"The tithe entry names Alexr Glasgow as occupier of 29 acres at Lisnagaver in 1834.","relevance":"It places a Glasgow occupier of the right name in the locality before the family baptisms and census.","limitation":"No age, residence, kinship or identifying detail connects this occupier conclusively to the man in the 1851 census."},"valuation-1863-1878":{"recorded_statement":"The valuation revision books continue Alexander Glasgow on Lisnagaver lot 25 beside John and Thomas Glasgow during the 1863–1878 volume.","relevance":"The continuing lot number supports tenancy continuity for the Lisnagaver Alexander and his local context.","limitation":"A valuation entry can lag a change in occupation and does not establish a precise death date, parentage or sibling relationship."}},"family":{"baptism-james-1837":{"recorded_statement":"Entry 75 records Jas Glascaw, born 17 January 1837 and baptised 9 February 1837, father Alex, mother Mary McAughin, residence Gortereagh.","relevance":"The birth date identifies the early James. The parents’ names and locality contribute to the continuing family sequence.","limitation":"The source is a transcription. Identifying these adults with the later Lisnagaver couple depends on the combined baptism and household evidence, not this entry alone."},"baptism-unnamed-1838":{"recorded_statement":"Rasharkin entry 106 names Alex and Molly McAughern as parents of an unnamed Glasgow child at Gortereagh in 1838.","relevance":"It is the concrete record behind the preserved unnamed-child relationship.","limitation":"The published entry preserves neither a forename nor a precise baptism date, and no free original image was found. MIC1P/292 requires onsite inspection or an ordered page copy, so the child must not be merged with either James."},"baptism-james-1843":{"recorded_statement":"Rasharkin entry 203 records James, born 9 October 1843 at Lisnagaver, as the child of Alex and Molly McAughern; the baptism was entered on 7 January 1844.","relevance":"The place, parents and date identify the later James as a distinct child in the continuing household.","limitation":"The reused name and the separate 1837 entry prevent treating this as the same James without the maintained identity assessment."},"census-1851":{"recorded_statement":"The 1851 Lisnagaver household includes Alexander, Mary and children Robert, James and Ann.","relevance":"It links the couple and the named children in one household and supplies continuity from the baptism records.","limitation":"It does not record a marriage date, and absence from a household cannot alone resolve the first James or unnamed 1838 child."},"marriage-robert-1866":{"recorded_statement":"Robert Glasgow named Alexander Glasgow, farmer, as his father in the 5 April 1866 marriage return.","relevance":"This is a direct later father statement supporting Robert as Alexander’s child.","limitation":"The return does not state Alexander’s age or prove the exact birth date imported for Robert."},"marriage-mary-1871":{"recorded_statement":"Mary Glasgow of Lisnagaver named Alexander Glasgow, farmer, as her father in the 14 June 1871 marriage return.","relevance":"It independently identifies Mary’s father and preserves her Lisnagaver connection.","limitation":"It does not name Mary’s mother or establish that every child attached in the tree belonged to the same marriage."},"marriage-ann-1876":{"recorded_statement":"Ann Glasgow named Alexander Glasgow, labourer, as her father in the 13 October 1876 marriage return and was associated with Lisnagaver.","relevance":"It supplies a direct father statement for Ann and extends the family identification beyond the 1851 census.","limitation":"The different occupation wording and lack of a mother’s name leave the household bridge indirect."}},"parents":{"will-daniel-1871":{"recorded_statement":"Daniel Glasgow’s will calls Thomas Glasgow his late brother and Daniel Neely Glasgow his nephew.","relevance":"It directly establishes Daniel and Thomas as brothers and provides the nephew identity needed to identify the relevant Thomas family.","limitation":"It does not name Alexander, the parents of the brothers or the degree of Alexander’s relationship to them."},"marriage-daniel-neely-1888":{"recorded_statement":"Daniel Neely Glasgow’s 28 June 1888 marriage return names Thomas Glasgow, farmer, as his father.","relevance":"The full son’s name connects the Thomas named in the will to the Lisnagaver Thomas family rather than relying on a shared surname.","limitation":"The return identifies Thomas as Daniel Neely’s father but does not identify Alexander as Thomas’s brother or son of the proposed older pair."},"tithe-1834":{"recorded_statement":"An Alexr Glasgow occupied Lisnagaver in 1834, where later records also place the Thomas–Daniel network.","relevance":"It supplies locality context for the working hypothesis that the families may be closely related.","limitation":"Neighbouring or repeated Glasgow occupations are not a parent or sibling statement, and the occupier’s identity is not independently resolved."}},"thomas-network":{"will-daniel-1871":{"recorded_statement":"Daniel’s will identifies Thomas as his brother and Daniel Neely Glasgow as his nephew.","relevance":"This is the sibling half of the identity bridge and is separate from the later marriage evidence.","limitation":"The will stops at Daniel’s relationship to Thomas; Alexander is not mentioned as a brother."},"marriage-daniel-neely-1888":{"recorded_statement":"The marriage return records Daniel Neely Glasgow and names Thomas Glasgow as his father.","relevance":"This is the father-and-son half of the bridge, matching the nephew named in Daniel’s will to Thomas’s son.","limitation":"It does not state how Alexander is related to Thomas or Daniel, so the network cannot be extended to brotherhood from these records alone."},"census-1851":{"recorded_statement":"Alexander headed a Lisnagaver household in 1851, in the same local area as the Thomas family records.","relevance":"It provides contemporary locality context for testing a close relationship.","limitation":"Enumeration proximity is not a kinship statement and cannot replace the will or marriage identity bridge."},"correspondence-thomas-2020":{"recorded_statement":"A public-safe summary of February 2020 correspondence reports an autosomal match and a descendant line from Thomas, alongside an Alexander-and-Rosanna tradition.","relevance":"It gives a concrete descendant and DNA route for testing Alexander’s connection to Thomas’s branch.","limitation":"The underlying match metrics, pedigree, message provenance and source for the parent names are not published or independently verified."}},"dna":{"correspondence-thomas-2020":{"recorded_statement":"The correspondence summary reports a match with a descendant of Thomas and a belief that Thomas’s parents were Alexander and Rosanna.","relevance":"It is an actionable autosomal lead directed at the exact unresolved bridge in the parent hypothesis.","limitation":"A reported match without shared-DNA metrics, segments and a complete pedigree cannot distinguish brothers, cousins or an alternative shared line."}}},"family_display":{"groups":[{"key":"spouses","title":"Partner","items":["McCaughan-222"]},{"key":"children","title":"Children","items":["Glasgow-438","Glasgow-973","Glasgow-3939","Glasgow-3167","Glasgow-938","Glasgow-3940"]},{"key":"parents","title":"Parent hypotheses","items":["Glasgow-3904",{"name":"Rosanna (surname unknown)","relationship":"mother","status":"possible","status_label":"Uncertain working mother","display":"proposed","reason":"The late tradition names Rosanna with older Alexander as Thomas’s parents; neither is established as Alexander-951’s parent."},"Glasgow-1367","Unknown-540856"]},{"key":"collateral","title":"Relevant collateral relatives","items":[{"id":"Glasgow-987","name":"Thomas Glasgow","relationship":"possible brother or cousin","status":"possible","status_label":"Possible; relationship unproved","basis":"research_assessment"},{"id":"Glasgow-3896","name":"Daniel Glasgow","relationship":"possible brother or cousin","status":"possible","status_label":"Possible; relationship unproved","basis":"research_assessment"}]},{"key":"siblings","title":"Tree-derived sibling attachments","items":["Glasgow-3955","Glasgow-3956","Glasgow-1387","Glasgow-4055","Glasgow-1049","Glasgow-1052"]}],"collateral":["Glasgow-987","Glasgow-3896"],"unassessed_siblings":["Glasgow-3955","Glasgow-3956","Glasgow-1387","Glasgow-4055","Glasgow-1049","Glasgow-1052"],"parent_hypotheses":["Glasgow-3904","Unknown-761034","Glasgow-1367","Unknown-540856"]},"family_reasons":{"McCaughan-222":"Three Rasharkin baptisms repeatedly name Alex with Mary or Molly McAughin/McAughern as parents, and the 1851 return records Alexander and Mary as husband and wife at Lisnagaver. Their marriage entry has not been found, but the spouse relationship is documented by these records.","Glasgow-438":"The 1851 household and Ann’s 1876 marriage, which names Alexander as father, support this documented child relationship.","Glasgow-973":"Entry 203 records James, born 9 October 1843 and baptised 7 January 1844 at Lisnagaver, as the son of Alex and Molly McAughern; the 1851 household records him aged seven. This documents the relationship. His proposed Michigan identity remains separate and unproved.","Glasgow-3939":"Entry 75 identifies James, born 17 January 1837 and baptised 9 February, as the son of Alex and Mary McAughin at Gortereagh. This documents his parents; his early death remains inferred.","Glasgow-3167":"Mary’s 1871 marriage names Alexander as her father and gives Lisnagaver as her residence.","Glasgow-938":"The 1851 household and Robert’s 1866 marriage, which names Alexander as father, support this documented child relationship.","Glasgow-3940":"Entry 106 is a concrete record of an unnamed child of Alex and Molly McAughern at Gortereagh in 1838. The parents are documented; no forename or precise death date is supplied.","Glasgow-3904":"This is the maintained working father hypothesis; the Thomas–Daniel network supplies a route to test, not a proved relationship.","Glasgow-1367":"This earlier imported proposal is retained as historical context but is superseded and not established.","Unknown-540856":"This imported attachment has no assessed documentary basis and is not treated as Alexander’s mother.","Glasgow-987":"Thomas is a relevant collateral comparator: Daniel’s will proves Thomas was Daniel’s brother, but Alexander’s relationship to Thomas remains possible rather than proved.","Glasgow-3896":"Daniel is relevant because his will proves Thomas was his brother; the further Alexander–Daniel relationship depends on the unproved Alexander–Thomas bridge."},"family_sources":{"McCaughan-222":["baptism-james-1837","baptism-unnamed-1838","baptism-james-1843","census-1851"],"Glasgow-438":["marriage-ann-1876"],"Glasgow-973":["baptism-james-1843","census-1851"],"Glasgow-3939":["baptism-james-1837"],"Glasgow-3167":["marriage-mary-1871"],"Glasgow-938":["marriage-robert-1866","census-1851"],"Glasgow-3940":["baptism-unnamed-1838"],"Glasgow-987":["will-daniel-1871","marriage-daniel-neely-1888"],"Glasgow-3896":["will-daniel-1871","marriage-daniel-neely-1888"]},"superseded_interpretations":[{"id":"acreage-subdivision","label":"Superseded acreage near-equality interpretation","rejected_claim":"The earlier 64-to-63-acre comparison was treated as evidence of a simple subdivision or close family relationship.","operative_correction":"The comparison used incompatible historical measures. It is retained for audit, but the acreage does not support a current identity, subdivision or parentage claim; no conversion factor is inferred for these particular records.","unaffected":"The underlying occupier names, holdings and later tenancy observations remain available as land-sequence evidence, subject to their own identity limitations.","source":"research/Glasgow-951/findings.md · Land-map correction and corrected land-succession assessment, 24 August 2026"}],"dna_summary":{"autosomal":"The February 2020 correspondence reports an autosomal connection to a descendant of Thomas. It is a lead toward the Alexander–Thomas bridge, not proof of a parent or sibling relationship, because the match metrics, segments and full descent are not published.","y_dna":"The publication-safe Y-DNA findings place a tested Alexander-descendant line in R-FT20271, with documented close Big-Y branch comparisons including the Glasgow-12 line. This supports paternal-line kinship research, but not an exact genealogical degree or Alexander’s parentage. Private original project material identifies the living tester behind kit N18544; the public page deliberately retains only the kit and its reported earliest ancestor, John Glasgow (1767–1851). The father-to-son descent is unverified, and the FT25406 project subgroup explicitly says a Big-Y upgrade is required.","limitation":"Autosomal and Y-DNA evidence answer different questions. Neither result alone identifies both parents or distinguishes a brother from a cousin in the nineteenth-century documentary network."},"research_tasks":[{"priority":1,"scope":"DNA/autosomal","status":"Original message assessed; DNA details still absent","status_date":"2026-09-13","provenance":"research/Glasgow-951/findings.md · Recommended next Y-DNA actions and recovered correspondence","what":"Recover the February 2020 match metrics, verified descent and source behind the Alexander-and-Rosanna belief.","tests":"Tests whether the reported Thomas-descendant connection can distinguish a sibling relationship from a more distant or alternative shared line.","matters":"The supplied original message separates a belief about Thomas's parents from a question about whether Alexander was Thomas's brother. It supplies no citation, shared-cM total, segment data or checked descent, so renewed contact is still required."},{"priority":2,"scope":"DNA/Y-DNA","status":"Tester privately identified; pedigree and consent pending","status_date":"2026-09-13","provenance":"research/Glasgow-951/findings.md · Highest-value unresolved records","what":"Verify the documented male-line descent, consent and current results behind kit N18544 before seeking a Big Y upgrade.","tests":"Tests whether the Inishrush/Rasharkin John Glasgow family belongs near or outside Alexander’s paternal branch.","matters":"The supplied 2022 project material privately identifies the living tester, while the public table confirms Y-67 and a reported earliest ancestor. Neither documents the descent. A close or separate Big-Y placement would help keep neighbouring Glasgow families distinct, but would not automatically prove Alexander’s parents."},{"priority":3,"scope":"Documentary/collateral","status":"Completed; both Bible images inspected","status_date":"2026-09-12","provenance":"research/Glasgow-951/findings.md; research/Glasgow-3927/1831_Ireland_Inishrush_John_Glasco.md · Existing source material","what":"Assess the already-held 20 March 1847 John Glasgow letter and inspect the associated family-Bible images.","tests":"Tests whether the letter or Bible preserves a Thomas, Daniel, Alexander or locality reference that can bridge the neighbouring Glasgow households.","matters":"The letter and both catalogued Bible images have been examined. The title page dates the volume to 1797; the family-register page confirms the nine-child sequence without an Alexander and records James's death on 20 April 1823. Neither source supplies a direct Alexander parentage link."},{"priority":4,"scope":"Documentary","status":"Archive-only; not yet inspected","status_date":"2026-09-12","provenance":"research/Glasgow-951/findings.md · Highest-value unresolved records","what":"Search Drimbolg session book MIC1C/15, 1809–1859, for Glasgow, Glascow and Glascaw entries with their surrounding cases.","tests":"Tests whether discipline, transfer, spouse, parent, residence or witness details connect the relevant households.","matters":"A session case can preserve household relationships absent from baptism and marriage indexes. Keep this separate from CR5/32/1/1/1–2."},{"priority":5,"scope":"Collateral","status":"Completed; identity resolved","status_date":"2026-09-12","provenance":"research/Glasgow-951/findings.md · Highest-value unresolved records","what":"Test the Boyd–Glasgow memorial against Daniel Neely Glasgow’s 1888 marriage and later Mary Jane Boyd records.","tests":"Tests the identity of Thomas’s son Daniel’s wife and may recover a documented descendant household.","matters":"The original marriage, paired birth returns, 1901 household and memorial form a continuous Boyd-family chain. This resolves Mary Jane's identity at high confidence without changing Alexander’s parent assessment."},{"priority":6,"scope":"Collateral","status":"Completed to parentage limit","status_date":"2026-09-12","provenance":"research/Glasgow-951/findings.md · Highest-value unresolved records","what":"Reconstruct Samuel Glasgow of Kilrea and Prescott backwards through Canadian probate, Presbyterian, land and newspaper records.","tests":"Tests whether the substantial Prescott merchant was a collateral member of the Kilrea Thomas–Daniel generation.","matters":"Robert's inspected 1849 will proves Samuel was his brother, corrects the later father–son account and names a sibling group. It names no parents and does not prove that brothers Daniel and Thomas are the Kilrea/Lisnagaver profiles."},{"priority":7,"scope":"Collateral","status":"Searched; identity unresolved","status_date":"2026-09-12","provenance":"research/Glasgow-951/findings.md · Highest-value unresolved records","what":"Obtain Mary Jane Hampton’s New Zealand death printout and inspect the cited Hampton family-history pages.","tests":"Tests whether the New Zealand woman is the 1837 Mary Jane Dysart, daughter of Jane Glasgow’s household.","matters":"Official indexes confirm marriage 1871/8379 and death 1881/1677, but the marriage-intention and death ages conflict with each other and the 1837 Rasharkin baptism. The paid printout is the decisive parent-and-birthplace source; no purchase was made."},{"priority":8,"scope":"Collateral migration","status":"Public search exhausted; archive files needed","status_date":"2026-09-12","provenance":"research/Glasgow-951/findings.md · Previously unsearched collateral reviewed","what":"Identify the Alexander Glasgow in Cape Supreme Court files KAB CSC 2/1/1/350 ref. 123 and 2/6/1/146 ref. 286, and test Eliza Glasgow's TAB MHG 913/43 estate.","tests":"Tests whether a South African namesake was Thomas's emigrant son and preserves a traceable male line.","matters":"Exact-name, reference and associate searches found no identity-bearing free record. The original court and estate files are now the required evidence; unrelated Australian results were excluded."},{"priority":9,"scope":"Collateral family","status":"Re-attempted; source unavailable","status_date":"2026-09-12","provenance":"research/Glasgow-951/findings.md · Previously unsearched collateral reviewed","what":"Search the National Archives of Ireland 1841/1851 census-search forms for applicants whose mother's maiden surname was Glasgow.","tests":"Tests for otherwise missing Glasgow daughters and household links in the pension evidence.","matters":"The official service timed out in browser and direct-read attempts. This remains pending and is not recorded as a negative search."},{"priority":10,"scope":"Poor-law records","status":"Early index searched; volume dates disputed; later films require sign-in","status_date":"2026-09-12","provenance":"research/Glasgow-951/findings.md · Previously unsearched collateral reviewed","what":"Search the indexed Ballymoney indoor-relief films for 1862–1883 (DGS 4130410) and 1883–1900 (DGS 8081205) for Alexander, Mary and their close family.","tests":"Tests whether either elderly spouse entered the workhouse or infirmary after the Lisnagaver holding changed hands.","matters":"The free BG/5/G/1 index was searched across surname variants and contains only Margaret Glasgow, whose details are locked. UHF describes 1843–1856, while the Irish Manuscripts Commission catalogue dates BG/5/G/1 to 1843–1849; the conflict prevents exclusion by date. The later FamilySearch films include indexes but currently require authenticated access."},{"priority":"Archive","scope":"Documentary","status":"Awaiting PRONI response","status_date":"2026-09-12","provenance":"research/Glasgow-951/findings.md · Highest-value unresolved records","what":"Search PRONI CR5/32/1/1/1–2 and the outstanding Kilraughts register material for Alexander, Thomas, Daniel and Rosanna as a household or society group.","tests":"Tests whether a contemporary church record names Alexander’s parents or connects him directly to the Thomas–Daniel family.","matters":"A family or society entry naming the relationship would be direct evidence; a bounded negative would narrow the route. It remains a separate archival queue, not silently folded into the numbered 11 September priorities."},{"priority":"Archive","scope":"Documentary","status":"Catalogue descriptions matched; manuscript not inspected","status_date":"2026-09-13","provenance":"research/Glasgow-951/findings.md · Supplied private correspondence and archive leads assessed","what":"Inspect PRONI D3300/256/1 and confirm whether it is dealer item 15700, then search its tenant, arrears and payment lists for Glasgow households.","tests":"Tests whether a 1786–1787 Killoquin estate account places a candidate household in the locality before the 1790 rent roll.","matters":"The two catalogue descriptions strongly suggest the same seven-page account but do not cross-cite each other, and neither description names Glasgow or Lisnagaver. Verify extent, pagination and signatures from the manuscript before treating the identification as proved."}],"completed_searches":[{"date":"2026-09-12","search":"John Glasgow family Bible and 1847 letter","result":"Both catalogued Bible images were located locally and inspected with the letter. The family register names nine children but no Alexander; the retrieval task is complete without a parentage bridge."},{"date":"2026-09-12","search":"Robert Glasgow Ballymoney civil death, 1868","result":"The official index confirms age 71, group 957324, but explicitly provides no image. Residence and informant remain inaccessible without ordering the certificate."},{"date":"2026-09-12","search":"Samuel Elder birth and 1911 Gortahar name","result":"The original birth return records Samuel Elder, while the inspected original 1911 census unequivocally records Samuel Glasgow. This is unexplained alternate-surname usage between original records; neither identifies his father."},{"date":"2026-09-12","search":"FamilySearch Alexander and Rosanna pedigree-file provenance","result":"The 2018 Pedigree Resource File cites only an Ancestry member tree and gives Rosanna's death as 28 October 1822, conflicting with the 2007 descendant post's 23 October date. No independent source was found."},{"date":"2026-09-12","search":"Boyd–Glasgow memorial identity","result":"Resolved at high confidence through the 1888 marriage, September 1889 birth returns, 1901 Tamlaght household and Drimbolg memorial."},{"date":"2026-09-12","search":"Samuel Glasgow of Kilrea and Prescott","result":"Robert Glasgow's original 1849 will proves Samuel was Robert's brother and names five other sibling shares. A further bounded free search found no record tying the will's Daniel or Thomas securely to the Kilrea/Lisnagaver men."},{"date":"2026-09-12","search":"Mary Jane Dysart/Hampton official New Zealand indexes","result":"Marriage 1871/8379 and death 1881/1677 found. Conflicting age evidence leaves identity with the 1837 Rasharkin child unresolved pending the paid death printout."},{"date":"2026-09-12","search":"Scottish female statutory deaths","result":"Scoped to Ann (Warwick) Glasgow, an already excluded Ayrshire cluster; 39 logged-out Ann Glasgow results require ScotlandsPeople account access for record-level review."},{"date":"2026-09-12","search":"Thomas Glasgow Belfast probate entry","result":"The official PRONI abstract resolves this as an intestate administration to widow Mary Anne Glasgow. No image, heirs, siblings or parents are supplied."},{"date":"2026-09-12","search":"Kit N18544 identity and public pedigree","result":"The supplied March–April 2022 project material privately identifies the living tester and corroborates a Y-67 match; the public table reports John Glasgow (1767–1851). The modern male-line descent remains undocumented, and the FT25406 subgroup is not a tested-SNP result for N18544."},{"date":"2026-09-12","search":"Rasharkin 1838 original baptism image","result":"No free image was found. MIC1P/292 is absent from PRONI's public digitisation list, so entry 106 remains unnamed pending onsite inspection or an ordered page copy."},{"date":"2026-09-12","search":"Daniel Glascow Troy identity","result":"No free census or newspaper record supplied family details. The cemetery transcription's 1913 date conflicts with the state index's 1931 date; certificate 9941 or the original cemetery card is still required."},{"date":"2026-09-12","search":"John Glasgow in Reformed Presbyterian volume 15","result":"The full-view original volume and its final February 1852 obituary pages were searched. No John Glasgow notice was found; this is a bounded negative for the identified volume, not proof that no brief notice existed elsewhere."},{"date":"2026-09-12","search":"South African Alexander Glasgow court and estate references","result":"Exact-name, archive-reference and associate searches found no identity-bearing public record or free image. KAB court files 2/1/1/350 ref. 123 and 2/6/1/146 ref. 286, plus TAB MHG 913/43, remain archive-file targets."},{"date":"2026-09-12","search":"Original February 2020 correspondence","result":"The supplied original message was assessed. It reports Catherine's descent and an Alexander-and-Rosanna belief, then separately asks whether Alexander could be Thomas's brother. No source, match amount, segments or verified descent chain is included."},{"date":"2026-09-12","search":"Ballymoney workhouse register, 1843–1856","result":"A surname-prefix search of the UHF index to PRONI BG/5/G/1 returned one entry, Margaret Glasgow, and no other Glasgow or usual variant. Her details require sign-in, and later indexed films covering 1862–1900 remain the relevant authenticated search."},{"date":"2026-09-12","search":"Rasharkin and Dromore school-register coverage","result":"PRONI's live catalogue dates Rasharkin SCH/94 pupil registers from 1870–71 and Dromore SCH/546 from 1867–70. These begin after Alexander's known children had reached adulthood, so the school lead is closed for James and Robert rather than left as unsearched archive work."},{"date":"2026-09-12","search":"Identity of daughter Nancy at Alexander's 1888 death","result":"No free record identifies the informant. Ann Glasgow-438 is the strongest candidate through her documented father and Lisnagaver residence, but no record calls her Nancy or places her at Gortahar. Thomas's daughter Nancy Glasgow-1362 is a plausible same-locality alternative; identity remains unresolved at low confidence."},{"date":"2026-09-12","search":"Original Robert Elder death entry, 1894","result":"Resolved at high confidence: Robert Elder, a married farmer aged 64, died at Gortahar on 18 November 1894, with Mary Elder, widow, of Gortahar reporting the death. The return does not explicitly call her his wife."},{"date":"2026-09-12","search":"Age-compatible Ballymoney births for Mary, Robert J. and Jane Elder","result":"Jane Matilda Elder's original 16 September 1878 Gortahar birth directly names Robert Elder and Mary Elder, with Mary's maiden surname entered as Glass; it matches Jane's 1901 age and shows her 1911 age is too low. The inspected Mary entries for 1873, 1874 and 1876 and Robert entries for 1873–1876 name other parents, so those two births remain unresolved."},{"date":"2026-09-12","search":"Post-1911 Gortahar Elder deaths and marriages","result":"No matching Ballymoney death or marriage was found for Mary, Robert J. or Jane through 1921, and no daughter-Mary marriage was found from 1901. Two age-plausible nationwide Mary Elder deaths were married women in Londonderry, conflicting with the Gortahar widow. Post-1921 GRONI checking remains pending because the official service was under scheduled maintenance until 14 September."},{"date":"2026-09-12","search":"Identity of Margaret Glasgow in the Ballymoney workhouse index","result":"The public UHF result is locked and gives no age, townland, family or dates. Several census candidates exist, but none can be linked. Conflicting catalogue coverage dates mean the entry cannot safely exclude candidates by age; identity remains unresolved."},{"date":"2026-09-13","search":"Adam Glasgow-3902 as Alexander's possible father","scope":"Adam parentage sources","result":"Seven focused public and archive-scoped searches found no new record naming Alexander as Adam's son. Failed archive endpoints remain access limitations, not database negatives; Adam-1622 stays distinct."},{"date":"2026-09-13","search":"Older Alexander and Rosanna parent tradition","scope":"Older-pair source audit","result":"Eleven focused searches found no independent parent record. The indexed 2020 Genes Reunited text says it copied the 2007 post; PRONI registers, the private tradition source and Killoquin rentals remain pending."},{"date":"2026-09-13","search":"Supplied 2024 autosomal comparison notes","scope":"Correspondence evidence audit","result":"The named matches separate into an already-known Alexander family route, a distinct Adelaide-to-Samuel pedigree, and two routes returning to the same William 1804 family. Predicted labels without cM, segments and checked descent do not prove Alexander's parents or validate the attached Robert pedigree."},{"date":"2026-09-13","search":"Killoquin 1786–1787 estate-account catalogue identity","scope":"Archive catalogue comparison","result":"Dealer item 15700 and PRONI D3300/256/1 align on estate, maker, format and dates, making a same-manuscript identification likely but unproved. No image was inspected and neither description names a Glasgow tenant."},{"date":"2026-09-13","search":"Automated parent-score provenance audit","scope":"Scoring audit","result":"The earlier 82 for John-1022 was invalid because a targeted repair rescored stripped public data. Scoring now rebuilds the rich source model and caps branch-derived results that traverse unproved or possible pedigree links."}],"visible_arguments":["thomas-network"],"vital_assessment_id":"alexander-951-reviewed-position","parent_candidates":[{"id":"older-alexander-rosanna","candidate":"Older Alexander Glasgow","father_profile_id":"Glasgow-3904","person_ids":["Glasgow-3904"],"state":"working","assessment":"Current working father hypothesis, inherited from the Alexander-and-Rosanna descendant tradition; not established by a contemporary record.","supports":["The 2007 descendant account names an older Alexander as Thomas Glasgow's father.","Alexander-951 belonged to the same local network as Thomas and Thomas's proved brother Daniel.","Recovered descendant correspondence supplies another route for testing that family connection."],"objections":["No contemporary record names Alexander-951's father or calls him Thomas's brother.","The tradition's original source is unknown.","The Alexander recorded at Lisnagaver in 1834 could be Alexander-951 himself, and the former acreage comparison has been retired."],"source_links":[{"href":"https://www.genesreunited.co.uk/boards/board/general_topics/thread/465937","label":"2007 descendant tradition concerning Thomas; not contemporary parent proof"},{"href":"https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Glasgow-3904","label":"Older Alexander research profile"}],"source_path":"research/Glasgow-951/presentation.json","score_profile_id":"Glasgow-3904"},{"id":"unidentified-lisnagaver-robert","candidate":"Unidentified Robert Glasgow, Lisnagaver tithe occupier in 1834","person_ids":[],"state":"open","assessment":"The Robert Glasgow recorded at Lisnagaver in 1834 remains a possible father of Alexander Glasgow; neither fatherhood nor his identification with Glenleslie Robert is established.","supports":"PRONI FIN/5/A/236, folio 17, separately records Robert and Alexander at Lisnagaver in 1834. This is a concrete local older-generation research route.","objections":"The tithe names Robert and Alexr on separate holdings but gives no ages, wife or kinship. No record identifies Alexander as Robert's son. The rejected acreage comparison supplies no support; the Coltrim household belongs to a separate unresolved comparison.","source_links":[{"href":"/people/glasgow-1367.html#question-robert-identity","label":"Robert: Lisnagaver and Glenleslie identity comparison"},{"href":"/people/glasgow-1367.html#question-alexander-father","label":"Why the father hypothesis remains open"},{"href":"/people/glasgow-1367.html#record-tithe-robert-lisnagaver-1834-robert-identity","label":"1834 Lisnagaver tithe: Robert and Alexr"},{"href":"https://www.irishgenealogy.ie/view/?record_id=cidenc-957324","label":"Unassigned Robert death index, Ballymoney 1868; identity unresolved"}],"source_path":"research/Glasgow-951/findings.md","score_profile_id":null,"score_label":"Record-defined lead","score_note":"The 1834 occupier has not been identified with a unique profile, so the profile-based algorithm cannot assign a defensible numerical score.","assertion_id":"C-robert-alexander-father-hypothesis","source_ids":["tithe-robert-lisnagaver-1834"]},{"id":"glenleslie-robert-father","candidate":"Robert Glasgow of Glenleslie","father_profile_id":"Glasgow-1367","person_ids":["Glasgow-1367"],"state":"weak","assessment":"Biologically possible father remains open but weak; not the leading local candidate and not an endorsement of the retired pedigree attachment.","supports":["His age of 72 in the 1851 census gives an estimated birth about 1779.","That age and his reported 1803 marriage allow a child of Alexander's approximate generation."],"objections":["The coherent Doonbought–Glenleslie record trail does not reach Lisnagaver.","No record names Alexander as his son.","Earlier work conflated him with the Coltrim household; the 1834 Lisnagaver Robert remains unidentified."],"source_links":[{"href":"/people/glasgow-1367.html#question-robert-identity","label":"Robert: Lisnagaver and Glenleslie identity comparison"},{"href":"/people/glasgow-1367.html#question-alexander-father","label":"Why the father hypothesis remains open"},{"href":"https://nationalarchives.ie/collections/search-the-census/census-record/#id=31234&census_year=1851","label":"Original 1851 Glenleslie household 23"},{"href":"https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Glasgow-1367","label":"Robert of Glenleslie research profile"}],"source_path":"research/Glasgow-951/findings.md","score_profile_id":"Glasgow-1367","score_note":"The individual score uses c.1779 from the original 1851 Glenleslie census only for the separately stated Glenleslie identity. It does not assign that date to the unresolved 1834 Lisnagaver occupier.","related_assertion_id":"C-robert-alexander-father-hypothesis"},{"id":"retired-robert-catherine-attachment","candidate":"Robert Glasgow of Glenleslie and Catherine Unknown: imported parent attachment","person_ids":["Glasgow-1367","Unknown-540856"],"state":"superseded","assessment":"Retired imported parental pair, not an active attachment recommendation. Distinct from Robert's still-open biological possibility.","supports":"Robert and Catherine are a documented married couple; their reported 1803 marriage is chronologically compatible.","objections":"No record connects Alexander-951 to this couple. Catherine's maternity is unassessed; chronology does not establish it. Current presentation explicitly supersedes the imported attachment.","source_links":[{"href":"/people/glasgow-1367.html#question-robert-identity","label":"Robert: Lisnagaver and Glenleslie identity comparison"},{"href":"/people/glasgow-1367.html#question-alexander-father","label":"Why the father hypothesis remains open"},{"href":"https://nationalarchives.ie/collections/search-the-census/census-record/#id=31234&census_year=1851","label":"Glenleslie census: Robert and Catherine's documented household"}],"source_path":"research/Glasgow-951/presentation.json","score_profile_id":null,"score_profile_ids":["Glasgow-1367","Unknown-540856"],"score_note":"Robert and Catherine are scored individually, not as a couple. Robert's c.1779 input belongs only to the Glenleslie identity and does not resolve the Lisnagaver occupier.","related_assertion_id":"C-robert-alexander-father-hypothesis"},{"id":"inishrush-adam-rose","candidate":"Adam Glasgow of Inishrush","father_profile_id":"Glasgow-3902","person_ids":["Glasgow-3902"],"state":"weak","assessment":"Maintained wider-kinship hypothesis, weak as direct parents of Alexander-951; no attachment supported.","supports":["He headed a documented nearby Inishrush family of the relevant older generation.","The family monument and Nancy's notice provide a defined group of children against which Alexander can be tested."],"objections":["Neither the monument nor another inspected record names Alexander.","The third male in the 1831 household is unnamed and cannot be assigned to him.","No proved descent links the Inishrush and Lisnagaver households."],"source_links":[{"href":"https://genealogy.torrens.org/BannValley/church/Tamlaght/1831census_3.html","label":"1831 Inishrush census transcription; unnamed household members"},{"href":"https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Glasgow-3902","label":"Adam and Rose's documented family and monument research"}],"source_path":"research/Glasgow-3902/findings.md","score_profile_id":"Glasgow-3902"},{"id":"inishrush-adam-record-father","candidate":"Adam Glasgow named in James's 1851 marriage","father_profile_id":"Glasgow-1622","person_ids":["Glasgow-1622"],"state":"open","assessment":"Concrete possible father or uncle research route through James; keep distinct from Adam-3902 pending identity proof.","supports":["James, aged 38 and a farmer of Inishrush, named his father as Adam Glasgow, farmer, on 17 March 1851.","James is of Alexander's generation in the nearby family network."],"objections":["The marriage names no Alexander and gives no residence for Adam himself.","James's identity with the older monument son remains unresolved.","The record cannot merge the two Adam identities or prove that James and Alexander were brothers."],"source_links":[{"href":"https://www.irishgenealogy.ie/view/?record_id=cima-3208068","label":"Original James Glasgow–Rosanna Barkley marriage, 17 March 1851"}],"source_path":"research/Glasgow-951/glasgow_parentage_master_integration_2026-09-05.md","score_profile_id":"Glasgow-1622"},{"id":"father-john-lisnagaver-branch","candidate":"John Glasgow, farmer: father of Lisnagaver John and probably Samuel","person_ids":[],"state":"open","assessment":"Named-father model conditional on Alexander being another brother; father's profile identity unresolved.","supports":"John-867's 1846 marriage names father John Glasgow, farmer. The 1851 census proves John and Samuel were brothers; John was Alexander's neighbour.","objections":"No record calls Alexander their brother or extends the father statement to him. Farm adjacency is insufficient and the acreage argument has been retired. Do not identify this father automatically as Glasgow-1022.","source_links":[{"href":"https://www.irishgenealogy.ie/view/?record_id=cima-3156063","label":"John Glasgow–Margaret Garvin marriage, 1846: father John"}],"source_path":"research/Glasgow-951/findings.md","score_profile_id":null,"score_label":"Conditional model","score_note":"The father named John is not identified with a unique profile, so only the documentary model can be reviewed; a profile score would invent an identity."},{"id":"glenleslie-john-1022","candidate":"John Glasgow of Glenleslie","father_profile_id":"Glasgow-1022","person_ids":["Glasgow-1022"],"state":"weak","assessment":"Specific identity hypothesis for a father John; neither his identity with the marriage father nor Alexander's descent is proved.","supports":["The nearby father-John branch provides a concrete name to test.","Maintained research has investigated this profile and the proposed Mary/Maryan family connection."],"objections":["Reported age and household chronology create problems.","Mary aged 28 in 1871 conflicts with granddaughter Maryan aged 17 in 1851, so that proposed bridge remains unproved.","No record names Alexander as John's son."],"source_links":[{"href":"https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Glasgow-1022","label":"John of Glenleslie research profile"},{"href":"https://www.irishgenealogy.ie/files/civil/marriage_returns/marriages_1871/11341/8162804.pdf","label":"Mary Glasgow–Robert Elder marriage, 1871; age conflict in proposed bridge"}],"source_path":"research/Glasgow-951/Glasgow-951.md","score_profile_id":"Glasgow-1022"},{"id":"john-mary-arthur","candidate":"John Glasgow of Inishrush, later Ohio","father_profile_id":"Glasgow-822","person_ids":["Glasgow-822"],"state":"weak","assessment":"Substantially weakened parent proposal; retained as a useful comparison family, not conclusively excluded.","supports":["He headed a documented geographically relevant family with children born from 1799 to 1815.","The reported John-1767 Y-DNA line offers a specific comparison test."],"objections":["The family Bible lists nine children and no Alexander.","Absolute completeness cannot be proved, but the recorded sequence weighs against this parentage.","A shared paternal DNA branch would not by itself prove fatherhood; the scored John-209 is a different man."],"source_links":[{"href":"https://www.hiltner.com/mckeown/getperson.php?personID=I368&tree=tree1","label":"John and Mary Arthur family register and Bible catalogue"},{"href":"https://www.hiltner.com/mckeown/documents/John%20Glasgow%20letter%20to%20Jane%20Glasgow%20Gray%203-20-1847.pdf","label":"John Glasgow letter, 20 March 1847, scan and transcript"}],"source_path":"research/Glasgow-951/glasgow_parentage_master_integration_2026-09-05.md","score_profile_id":"Glasgow-822"},{"id":"larne-james-3986","candidate":"James Glasgow of Larne","father_profile_id":"Glasgow-3986","person_ids":["Glasgow-3986"],"state":"working","verdict_label":"Leading named-James lead","assessment":"Leading identified candidate for the father-name hypothesis, but still a weak geographic match and not a proved father.","supports":["Alexander's first recorded son was James in 1837 and the name was reused in 1843, compatible with—but not proof of—a paternal-grandfather naming pattern.","James's estimated birth about 1773 is chronologically suitable.","The 1795 Larne merchant record and 1797 'James Glasgow junior' record distinguish a younger adult James in County Antrim."],"objections":["The records place James in Larne, not Lisnagaver, and no inspected record connects the two places or households.","Neither deed names Alexander or states James's parentage.","Naming customs were not universal, and the complete birth order and maternal grandparent names are not known."],"source_links":[{"href":"https://genealogy.torrens.org/BannValley/church/RasharkinP/Baptisms_1834.html","label":"Rasharkin baptism transcription: James in 1837 and 1843"},{"href":"https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3Q9M-CSH3-Q9B8-H","label":"1795 Larne deed: James Glasgow, merchant"},{"href":"https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3Q9M-CSH3-Q96R-C","label":"1797 Larne deed: James Glasgow junior"}],"source_path":"research/Glasgow-951/findings.md","score_profile_id":"Glasgow-3986","score_note":"This is a profile-based chronology and locality score, not a probability. The direct Lisnagaver connection remains missing."},{"id":"coltrim-robert","candidate":"Robert Glasgow of Coltrim","father_profile_id":"Glasgow-3941","person_ids":["Glasgow-3941"],"state":"weak","assessment":"Separate low-priority possible older relative investigated in the father audit; no bridge to Alexander.","supports":["The 1820 lease, 1827 tithe and 1831 census establish a Coltrim householder with a substantial family."],"objections":["The household supplies no children's names or ages.","This man is not established as either Glenleslie Robert or the 1834 Lisnagaver Robert.","The Coltrim household totals cannot be used to enlarge Glenleslie Robert's family."],"source_links":[{"href":"http://www.census.nationalarchives.ie/pages/1831/Londonderry/Loughinshollin/Lissane/Coltrim/2/","label":"1831 Coltrim household 2"},{"href":"https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Glasgow-3941","label":"Separate Coltrim Robert research profile"}],"source_path":"research/Glasgow-3941/findings.md","score_profile_id":"Glasgow-3941"},{"id":"excluded-james-1702","candidate":"James Glasgow, born 1799","father_profile_id":"Glasgow-1702","person_ids":["Glasgow-1702"],"state":"excluded","assessment":"Explicitly rejected father candidate in the maintained research despite a stored automated score.","supports":["Previously proposed by name; the current dossier still returns an automated lead."],"objections":["The researched 1799 birth makes him only about twelve at Alexander's census-implied birth, and even younger under the 1888 death-age estimate.","His marriage names his own father as William and supplies no Lisnagaver bridge.","The algorithm's approximate-date allowance does not override the manual exclusion."],"source_links":[{"href":"https://civilrecords.irishgenealogy.ie/churchrecords/details-civil/178e293212496","label":"James's civil marriage record, cited in the maintained rejection"},{"href":"https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Glasgow-1702","label":"James research profile"}],"source_path":"research/Glasgow-951/research_plan.json","score_profile_id":"Glasgow-1702","score_note":"The algorithm's approximate-date allowance still produces 39, but the maintained evidence puts James only about twelve when Alexander was born. The reviewed exclusion overrides that numerical lead."},{"id":"excluded-john-jane-mcclure","candidate":"John Glasgow of Clough/Ballymoney","father_profile_id":"Glasgow-1657","person_ids":["Glasgow-1657"],"state":"excluded","assessment":"Excluded as a practical direct-father lead, not a claim of biological impossibility.","supports":["Explicitly investigated in the maintained male-candidate audit."],"objections":["He belongs to a distinct family with Jane McClure.","No Lisnagaver connection was found."],"source_links":[{"href":"https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Glasgow-1657","label":"John's separate family research profile"}],"source_path":"research/Glasgow-951/male_candidate_audit_2026-08-05.md","score_profile_id":"Glasgow-1657"},{"id":"comparison-daniel","candidate":"Daniel Glasgow of Kilrea: collateral comparison, not a maintained father proposal","person_ids":["Glasgow-3896"],"state":"comparison","assessment":"Stored father-score hit retained only to explain its collateral research role.","supports":"Daniel's will proves his brotherhood with Thomas, central to testing the older-Alexander/Rosanna family tradition.","objections":"The maintained model makes Alexander a possible brother or cousin of Daniel, not his proved son. The score's tree-derived naming network is not independent parentage evidence.","source_links":[{"href":"https://apps.proni.gov.uk/willscalendar_ie/willssearch.aspx","label":"PRONI Will Calendars: Daniel Glasgow of Kilrea, proved 1871"},{"href":"https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Glasgow-3896","label":"Daniel's will and collateral research account"}],"source_path":"research/Glasgow-951/glasgow_parentage_master_integration_2026-09-05.md","score_profile_id":"Glasgow-3896","score_note":"The algorithm returns 39, but Daniel's indexed birth year makes him only about fifteen when Alexander was born. The maintained research keeps him as a collateral comparison, not a parent proposal."},{"id":"comparison-samuel","candidate":"Samuel Glasgow of Lisnagaver: collateral comparison, not a father candidate","person_ids":["Glasgow-2908"],"state":"comparison","assessment":"The male-candidate audit expressly excludes him from parent-candidate scope; included to distinguish his stored score from maintained research.","supports":"The 1851 census identifies Samuel as John's brother, informing the separate father-John hypothesis.","objections":"No record makes Samuel Alexander's father. He was the unmarried linen weaver; the maintained work treats him as collateral and identifies Glasgow-3472 as a duplicate, not another candidate.","source_links":[{"href":"https://www.irishgenealogy.ie/view/?record_id=cide-7225943","label":"Samuel's 17 August 1875 death: bachelor weaver at Lisnagaver"},{"href":"https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Glasgow-2908","label":"Samuel and the documented John–Samuel brotherhood"}],"source_path":"research/Glasgow-951/male_candidate_audit_2026-08-05.md","score_profile_id":"Glasgow-2908"}],"resolution":{"state":"resolved","basis":["approved structured assessment"],"issues":[],"source_ids":["alexander-951-reviewed-position","research/Glasgow-951/findings.md"]},"record_associations":[{"record_id":"tithe-1834","date":"1834","year":1834,"association":"Tithe Applotment: Alexr Glasgow at Lisnagaver","role":"Named occupier","place":"Lisnagaver, Rasharkin parish","status":"Direct occupier evidence","source_url":"https://www.billmacafee.com/182030stithe/tithenorthantrimrevisionorder.pdf","note":"The entry gives Alexander 29 acres at Lisnagaver. It supplies no age or relationship and is not independently proved to be the later Alexander."},{"record_id":"baptism-james-1837","date":"9 February 1837","year":1837,"association":"James Glasgow baptism, Rasharkin entry 75","role":"Baptism record","place":"Gortereagh, Rasharkin","status":"Contemporary baptism transcription","source_url":"https://genealogy.torrens.org/BannValley/church/RasharkinP/Baptisms_1834.html","note":"Entry 75 records Jas Glascaw, born 17 January 1837 and baptised 9 February 1837, father Alex, mother Mary McAughin, residence Gortereagh. The birth date matches the early James profile; identifying the adults across later residences is a separate question.","_profile_context":{"role":"Father of the baptised child, recorded as Alex","timeline_group":"Records mentioning this person"}},{"record_id":"baptism-unnamed-1838","date":"1838","year":1838,"association":"Unnamed Glasgow child baptism, Rasharkin entry 106","role":"Baptism record","place":"Gortereagh, Rasharkin","status":"Concrete record; child unnamed","source_url":"https://genealogy.torrens.org/BannValley/church/RasharkinP/Baptisms_1834.html","related_url":"/people/glasgow-3940.html","note":"The entry names Alex and Molly McAughern. The published transcription preserves neither the child's forename nor a precise baptism date.","_profile_context":{"role":"Father of the baptised child, recorded as Alex","timeline_group":"Records mentioning this person"}},{"record_id":"baptism-james-1843","date":"7 January 1844","year":1844,"association":"James Glasgow baptism, Rasharkin entry 203","role":"Baptism record","place":"Lisnagaver, Rasharkin","status":"Contemporary baptism transcription","source_url":"https://genealogy.torrens.org/BannValley/church/RasharkinP/Baptisms_1834.html","note":"The transcription names Alex and Molly McAughern as the parents of James, born 9 October 1843.","_profile_context":{"role":"Parent of the baptised child; the father identity is assessed in the Alexander dossier","timeline_group":"Records mentioning this person"}},{"record_id":"census-1851","date":"1851","year":1851,"association":"Lisnagaver household 35 census return","role":"Head of household; farmer","place":"Lisnagaver, Rasharkin","status":"Original census record","source_url":"https://www.census.nationalarchives.ie/pages/1851/Antrim/Kilconway/Rasharkin/Lisnagaver/35/","note":"Alexander, 40, lived with Mary and children Robert, James and Ann.","_profile_context":{"role":"Head of household; farmer","timeline_group":"Life events"}},{"record_id":"valuation-griffiths-1855","date":"1850s","year":1855,"association":"Griffith's Valuation: Alexander at Lisnagaver","role":"Named occupier","place":"Lisnagaver, Rasharkin parish","status":"Valuation record","source_url":"https://www.failteromhat.com/griffiths/antrim/rasharkin.htm","note":"Alexander and Thomas appear at Lisnagaver, with Daniel and Robert at adjoining Gortereghy. The entries support a local network but do not prove kinship."},{"record_id":"valuation-1863-1878","date":"1863–1878","year":1870,"association":"PRONI valuation revision books, Lisnagaver lot 25","role":"Named occupier","place":"Lisnagaver, Rasharkin parish","status":"Original valuation series","source_url":"https://apps.proni.gov.uk/Val12B/Search.aspx","note":"Alexander's name continues on lot 25 beside John and Thomas Glasgow. Valuation continuity does not establish his death date or parentage."},{"record_id":"valuation-1879-1888","date":"1879–1888","year":1884,"association":"PRONI valuation revision books: Alexander struck from Lisnagaver lot 25","role":"Named occupier; later struck out","place":"Lisnagaver, Rasharkin parish","status":"Original valuation series","source_url":"https://apps.proni.gov.uk/Val12B/Search.aspx","note":"The later volume records changes in 1881, 1882 and 1886; Robert Elder occupied the lot by the next volume. This narrows the land change but does not prove Alexander's death date."},{"record_id":"marriage-robert-1866","date":"5 April 1866","year":1866,"association":"Robert Glasgow and Jane Graham marriage","role":"Father of groom","place":"Churchtown, Tamlaght O'Crilly","status":"Direct father statement","source_url":"https://civilrecords.irishgenealogy.ie/churchrecords/images/marriage_returns/marriages_1866/11531/8240963.pdf","note":"Robert named Alexander Glasgow, farmer, as his father.","_profile_context":{"role":"Father of groom","timeline_group":"Records mentioning this person"}},{"record_id":"marriage-mary-1871","date":"14 June 1871","year":1871,"association":"Mary Glasgow and Robert Elder marriage return","role":"Marriage record","place":"Ballymoney registration district; bride of Lisnagaver","status":"Original civil return","source_url":"https://www.irishgenealogy.ie/files/civil/marriage_returns/marriages_1871/11341/8162804.pdf","note":"Mary Glasgow, aged 28, named Alexander Glasgow, farmer, as her father and married Robert Elder."},{"record_id":"marriage-ann-1876","date":"13 October 1876","year":1876,"association":"Robert McCracken and Ann Glasgow marriage","role":"Father of bride","place":"Ballymoney registration district","status":"Direct father statement","source_url":"https://www.irishgenealogy.ie/files/civil/marriage_returns/marriages_1876/11181/8097170.pdf","note":"Ann named Alexander Glasgow, labourer, as her father and was associated with Lisnagaver.","_profile_context":{"role":"Father of bride","timeline_group":"Records mentioning this person"}},{"record_id":"birth-jane-elder-1878","date":"16 September 1878","year":1878,"association":"Jane Matilda Elder civil birth return","role":"Birth record","place":"Gortahar","status":"Original civil return; high-confidence identification","source_url":"https://www.irishgenealogy.ie/files/civil/birth_returns/births_1878/02945/2078820.pdf","note":"Jane Matilda Elder was born at Gortahar to farmer Robert Elder and Mary Elder, whose maiden surname is entered as Glass; Robert, her father, informed the birth. Exact parents, place and middle initial identify the later Jane M. Elder.","_profile_context":{"role":"Granddaughter's birth and Elder-family continuation","timeline_group":"Collateral records"}},{"record_id":"death-alexander-1888","date":"16 May 1888","year":1888,"association":"Alexander Glasgow civil death register","role":"Subject","place":"Gortahar","status":"Leading identification","source_url":"https://www.irishgenealogy.ie/files/civil/deaths_returns/deaths_1888/06179/4766466.pdf","note":"The register records a married labourer aged 84, with daughter Nancy present. The age conflicts with the 1851 census, but the place and family network make this the leading death match."},{"record_id":"death-mary-1892","date":"17 February 1892","year":1892,"association":"Mary Glasgow civil death register","role":"Death record","timeline_role":"Record of the presumed spouse's death; daughter Mary Elder informed","place":"Gortahar","status":"Later household evidence","source_url":"https://www.irishgenealogy.ie/files/civil/deaths_returns/deaths_1892/06049/4723532.pdf","note":"Mary Glasgow, widow, housewife, aged 89, died at Gortahar on 17 February 1892; daughter Mary Elder was present. The formerly maintained 27 February date was a transcription error. Identification with Mary McCaughan is strongly supported through the 1871 Elder–Glasgow marriage and Lisnagaver family evidence.","_profile_context":{"role":"Record of the presumed spouse's death; daughter Mary Elder informed","timeline_group":"Collateral records"}},{"record_id":"death-robert-elder-1894","date":"18 November 1894","year":1894,"association":"Robert Elder civil death register","role":"Death record","place":"Gortahar","status":"Original civil return; high-confidence identification","source_url":"https://www.irishgenealogy.ie/files/civil/deaths_returns/deaths_1894/05952/4691448.pdf","note":"Robert Elder, married farmer, aged 64, died at Gortahar; Mary Elder, widow, of Gortahar was present and registered the death. The return does not explicitly call her his wife.","_profile_context":{"role":"Son-in-law's death and Elder-family continuation","timeline_group":"Collateral records"}},{"record_id":"death-mary-jane-elder-1897","date":"11 June 1897","year":1897,"association":"Mary Jane Elder civil death register","role":"Elder-family continuation","place":"Lisnagaver","status":"Collateral family record","source_url":"https://www.irishgenealogy.ie/files/civil/deaths_returns/deaths_1897/05858/4660280.pdf","note":"A later Elder record retained in the profile's family reconstruction; it does not identify Alexander's parents."},{"record_id":"census-elder-1901-1911","date":"1901–1911","year":1901,"association":"Elder household continuation in Gortahar and Lisnagaver","role":"Descendant-family context","place":"Gortahar and Lisnagaver","status":"Original census forms inspected","source_url":"https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:QPB2-KNM2","note":"The original 1901 and 1911 forms continue Mary, Robert and Jane Elder at Gortahar. The 1911 manuscript calls the child Samuel Glasgow while his original 1908 birth records Samuel Elder; the alternate surname is unexplained and does not identify his father."},{"record_id":"will-daniel-1871","date":"1871","year":1871,"association":"Daniel Glasgow will, proved 1871","role":"Relationship record","place":"Kilrea","status":"Original registered-will image inspected in maintained research; link is the PRONI search portal","source_url":"https://apps.proni.gov.uk/willscalendar_ie/willssearch.aspx","note":"Daniel Glasgow of Kilrea, died 16 October 1871; will proved at Londonderry by Samuel Neely of Kilrea, sole executor. The inspected original names son David of the City of London, late brother Thomas and nephew Daniel Neely Glasgow. Source: PRONI Will Calendars; the link opens the search, not the original image. Retrieval and inspection are recorded in Daniel’s source manifest.","_profile_context":{"role":"Collateral family record naming Thomas as Daniel's brother","timeline_group":"Collateral records"}},{"record_id":"marriage-daniel-neely-1888","date":"28 June 1888","year":1888,"association":"Daniel Neely Glasgow and Mary Jane Boyd marriage","role":"Marriage record","place":"Boveedy Presbyterian Church; groom of Lisnagaver, bride of Tamlaght","status":"Original civil return","source_url":"https://www.irishgenealogy.ie/files/civil/marriage_returns/marriages_1888/10763/5925382.pdf","note":"Daniel Neely Glasgow named Thomas Glasgow, farmer, as his father and resided at Lisnagaver. Mary Jane Boyd resided at Tamlaght and named Hugh Boyd, farmer, as her father.","_profile_context":{"role":"Collateral marriage record identifying Thomas as Daniel Neely's father","timeline_group":"Collateral records"}},{"record_id":"correspondence-thomas-2020","date":"9–11 February 2020","year":2020,"association":"Private correspondence: reported autosomal connection to Thomas's descendants","role":"Research correspondence","place":"Email thread, ‘The Glasgow Surname’","status":"Unverified lead","note":"A correspondent reported descent from Thomas and repeated the Alexander-and-Rosanna tradition. Match metrics, segment data, complete descent and the source behind the parent names remain outstanding; private message text is not published."},{"record_id":"tithe-robert-lisnagaver-1834","association":"Robert Glasgow tithe occupier at Lisnagaver","date":"1834","year":1834,"place":"Lisnagaver","source_url":"https://genealogy.torrens.org/BannValley/records/tithe.html","status":"Original tithe inspected in maintained research; linked transcription","note":"The original PRONI FIN/5/A/236 entry lists Robt Glasgow with 35 acres, separately from Alexr Glasgow with 29. No age or kinship is stated. Neither the later Glenleslie identity nor a succession of these parcels is established.","_profile_context":{"role":"Neighbouring occupier; possible father, relationship unproved","timeline_group":"Collateral records"}}],"vitals":{"birth":{"date":"c. 1722 (estimated)","place":"Duneane civil parish (estimated)","status":"estimated"},"death":{"date":null,"place":null,"status":null}},"relationships":{"parents":[],"spouses":[],"children":[],"siblings":[]}}}