{"schema_version":"1.0","id":"record-hugh-glasgow-tamlaght-o-crilly-1740-entry-1272","alternate_ids":[],"catalogue_id":"record-hugh-glasgow-tamlaght-o-crilly-1740-entry-1272","name":"Hugh Glasgow","canonical_url":"https://glasgow.phenotype.dev/people/record-hugh-glasgow-tamlaght-o-crilly-1740-entry-1272.html","json_url":"https://glasgow.phenotype.dev/people/record-hugh-glasgow-tamlaght-o-crilly-1740-entry-1272.json","network_url":"https://glasgow.phenotype.dev/people/record-hugh-glasgow-tamlaght-o-crilly-1740-entry-1272.network.json","wikitree_url":null,"vitals":{"birth":{"date":"c. 1722 (estimated)","place":"Tamlaght O'Crilly, County Londonderry, Ireland (estimated)","status":"estimated"},"death":{"date":null,"place":null,"status":null}},"identity":{"gender":"Male","occupations":[],"locations":["Tamlaght O'Crilly, County Londonderry, Ireland (estimated)","Tamlaght O'Crilly, County Londonderry, Ireland"],"aliases":[],"research_clusters":["Descendants of Hugh Glasgow (c.1706)"]},"relationships":{"parents":[],"spouses":[],"children":[],"siblings":[]},"claims":[{"id":"C-5aaa8da6bd8f","type":"recorded_occurrence","subject_ids":["record-hugh-glasgow-tamlaght-o-crilly-1740-entry-1272"],"claim":"Hugh Glasgow was recorded in Tamlaght O'Crilly, County Londonderry, Ireland (1740).","status":"proved","status_label":"Documented","evidence_ids":["E-5aaa8da6bd8f"],"notes":"Householder, entry 1272","provenance":"mapped_record"}],"evidence":[{"id":"E-5aaa8da6bd8f","claim_ids":["C-5aaa8da6bd8f"],"record_type":"Householder, entry 1272","date":"1740","place":"Tamlaght O'Crilly, County Londonderry, Ireland","subjects":["record-hugh-glasgow-tamlaght-o-crilly-1740-entry-1272"],"assertion":"Distinct 1740 household; the stronger candidate for Hugh-548, but identity remains unproved.","evidence_status":"direct","source_quality":"unknown","independence_group":"SRC-aeb5155d211a","source":{"title":"Virtual Record Treasury of Ireland, PRONI T808/15258: 1740 Protestant householders return","repository":null,"reference":"7dd0b19d7ebc83dc","url":"https://www.virtualtreasury.ie/item/PRONI-T808-15258"},"provenance":"religious-return"}],"open_questions":[],"research_leads":[],"source_summary":[{"title":"Virtual Record Treasury of Ireland, PRONI T808/15258: 1740 Protestant householders return","url":"https://www.virtualtreasury.ie/item/PRONI-T808-15258","source_quality":"unknown","independence_group":"SRC-aeb5155d211a","provenance":"religious-return"}],"warnings":[],"provenance":{"tree":"WikiTree One-Tree export","mapped_records":"Glasgow Surname Project map dataset","profile_capture":"Public WikiTree profile evidence capture","relationship_assessments":"Controlled local relationship hypothesis register"},"research_findings":[],"similar_people":[{"id":"Glasgow-3931","name":"Hugh Glasgow","catalogue_id":"glasgow-3931","html_url":"/people/glasgow-3931.html","birth_year":1720,"death_year":null,"birth_place":"Tamlaght, County Londonderry, Ireland","death_place":null,"score":51,"classification":"similar person","match_reasons":["same first and last name (+18)","birth years within 2 (+25)","overlapping locality (+8)"],"conflicts":[],"matching_children":[],"child_name_overlap":[],"parent_comparison":"No shared parent is indexed"},{"id":"Glasgow-2448","name":"Hugh Glasgow","catalogue_id":"glasgow-2448","html_url":"/people/glasgow-2448.html","birth_year":1717,"death_year":null,"birth_place":"Kilwinning, Ayrshire, Scotland","death_place":null,"score":36,"classification":"similar person","match_reasons":["same first and last name (+18)","birth years within 5 (+18)"],"conflicts":[],"matching_children":[],"child_name_overlap":[],"parent_comparison":"No shared parent is indexed"}],"potential_parentage":{"children_recorded":[],"earliest_dated_son":null,"earliest_dated_daughter":null,"second_dated_son":null,"second_dated_daughter":null,"third_dated_son":null,"third_dated_daughter":null,"naming_controls":{"matches":0,"mismatches":0,"factor":1.0,"details":[]},"candidates":[],"method":"Automated leads use birth surnames—not married surnames—as parental eligibility, role-specific biological age limits, bounded and approximate-date uncertainty, household chronology, specific time-aware localities, mapped distance, tenancy succession, migration destinations and sex-aware Scottish naming positions across generations. People already attached as the subject's parents stay in the identity summary and are excluded from this alternative-candidate list, regardless of relationship confidence. The main calibration uses clues available on disconnected profiles; existing parent and sibling links are retained as comparison context rather than treated as transferable evidence. Common ordered names and grandparent-to-child echoes receive a small non-zero weight, so a John or James match can support several independent criteria without producing a lead alone. Rare names, repeated bearers and bundles across otherwise distinct branches receive substantially more weight according to catalogue frequency. An exact migration place is weighted by its rarity and repetition across both branches; a shared destination country is worth only one point. Extra weight is added only when at least three independent clue types converge: naming, locality, specific migration, household chronology or collateral networks. Sparse profiles retain a clearly labelled chronology-only fallback instead of disappearing. Countries, states, counties and research clusters do not count as a shared locality, and fallback, broad representative or kin-inferred coordinates are excluded from distance scoring. Shared descendant profiles are removed before branch-name comparison. A candidate already recorded as a parent-in-law is excluded. A confident or independently supported parent is treated as settled; uncertain and unassessed attachments remain open to alternative comparison. A different linked parent, an uncle/aunt or grandparent path, and a matching existing child profile prevent an alternative from being classified as a strong direct-parent lead until the underlying tree conflict or duplicate is resolved. Familiar forms such as Bessie are normalised. Surname remains an eligibility filter worth zero points.","warning":"Naming customs, shared farms and occupations are circumstantial. Children, spouses and collateral relatives may be missing, and tree-derived family networks are not independent evidence. Scores rank research leads; they do not prove parentage."},"profile_creation":{"status":"create_new_profile","identity_note":"","draft_path":"surname-research/new-people/1740_Ireland_Tamlaght_O_Crilly_entry_1272_Hugh_Glasgow.md","draft_wikitext":"{{Estimated Date}}\n[[Category:Glasgow Name Study]]\n\n== Biography ==\n\n'''Hugh Glasgow''' was one of two distinct men of that name recorded as\nProtestant householders in Tamlaght O'Crilly parish, County Londonderry, in\n1740. In the surviving collector-order transcription this Hugh is entry\n'''1272''', between Henry Lennox and Hugh Ellis and immediately followed by\nJames McCullough.<ref name=\"Householders1740\">PRONI T808/15258, ''Names of\n14,400 Protestant householders'', Tamlaght O'Crilly, 1740, pp. 108-109;\nRichard John Torrens,\n[https://genealogy.torrens.org/BannValley/books/Kilrea/Kilrea07.html\ncollector-order transcription], entry 1272; W. Macafee,\n[https://www.billmacafee.com/1740returns/1740religiousreturnsulstername.pdf\nsurname transcription], recording the townland as \"Not specified\".</ref>\n\nThe other householder, entry 1195, is represented by\n[[Glasgow-3931|Hugh Glasgow]]. The two entries establish separate households;\nthey do not state that the men were related.<ref name=\"Householders1740\" />\n\n{| class=\"wikitable\" style=\"padding:5px; width:100%;\"\n|+ '''Evidence summary'''\n|-\n! style=\"background-color:#E1F0B4;\" | Point\n! style=\"background-color:#E1F0B4;\" | Assessment\n|-\n| Hugh Glasgow was an adult householder in 1740\n| Directly supported by the surviving return transcript\n|-\n| Residence in Tamlaght O'Crilly parish\n| Directly supported\n|-\n| Exact townland or Inishrush residence\n| Unknown; the return says \"Not specified\"\n|-\n| Wife, children and relationship to other Glasgows\n| Unknown; leave unconnected\n|}\n\n== Research Notes ==\n\n=== Possible existing profile ===\n\n[[Glasgow-548|Hugh Glasgow]] is the leading possible identity. A much later\nfamily history says that he moved from County Tyrone to County Londonderry,\nworked for a McCullough and married Margaret McCullough. The position of entry\n1272 immediately before Hugh Ellis and James McCullough is compatible with that\naccount.<ref name=\"FamilyHistory\">[[Glasgow-590|William Melanchthon Glasgow]],\n[https://www.wikitree.com/photo.php/0/0a/Glasgow-590.pdf ''History of the Glasgow\nFamily''], pp. 2-3.</ref>\n\nThat is not proof of identity. Create entry 1272 as an unconnected,\nrecord-defined person rather than assigning the event to [[Glasgow-548]]. The\n1740 return gives no age, origin, occupation,\nwife or child; collector order can cross localities; and the family account was\nwritten roughly 160 years later and contains demonstrated chronological errors.\nDo not merge the new profile into [[Glasgow-548]] or attach relatives without a lease, rental,\nchurch record, will or other source that supplies identifying family details.\n\nHugh's actual birthplace is unknown. Tamlaght O'Crilly is suitable only as an\nuncertain creation-field location inferred from the parish household in which\nthe 1740 return directly recorded him; the return does not name a townland.\n\n=== Relationship to the Inishrush family ===\n\nThe entry is the strongest record-defined earlier-generation occurrence in the\nlocal cluster alongside [[Glasgow-3931|the other 1740 Hugh]]. It is biologically\npossible that either man was the father or grandfather of\n[[Glasgow-3902|Adam Glasgow]] or a relative of [[Glasgow-822|John Glasgow]]. No\nsource states such a relationship. Do not attach [[Glasgow-3905|the former\nunknown-father placeholder]] beneath either Hugh.\n\n== Sources ==\n\n<references />","creation_allowed":true}}