Suggested profile text
WikiTree profile and prepared draft
WikiTree profile text
The prepared text for the public WikiTree profile, kept here so it can be compared with the current profile.
The prepared amendment is already on WikiTree; no pending biography change.
Compared with Glasgow-1098, captured 2026-09-27T23:38:56+00:00 · 2026-09-27.
Current captured WikiTree biography
Read-only capture used for the comparison above.
Side-by-side comparison of the live and replacement profiles
No biography changes in this draft.
Current profileReplacement profile
Current profile1[[Category:Glasgow Name Study]]
Replacement profile1[[Category:Glasgow Name Study]]
Current profile2{{Estimated Date}}
Replacement profile2{{Estimated Date}}
Current profile3
Replacement profile3
Current profile4== Biography ==
Replacement profile4== Biography ==
Current profile5
Replacement profile5
Current profile6{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; background-color:#E1F0B4;"
Replacement profile6{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; background-color:#E1F0B4;"
Current profile7| '''Likely father:''' [[Space:John_de_Glasgow_alias_Smith_/_John_Glasgow_of_Saltmarket'|John Glasgow of Saltmarket (c.1480–before 1553)]]. This is the maintained, sourced biography for William's predecessor and probable father. The attached [[Glasgow-1095|John Glasgow]] profile is an older unsourced placeholder; use the free-space biography for the current research.
Replacement profile7| '''Likely father:''' [[Space:John_de_Glasgow_alias_Smith_/_John_Glasgow_of_Saltmarket'|John Glasgow of Saltmarket (c.1480–before 1553)]]. This is the maintained, sourced biography for William's predecessor and probable father. The attached [[Glasgow-1095|John Glasgow]] profile is an older unsourced placeholder; use the free-space biography for the current research.
Current profile8|}
Replacement profile8|}
Current profile9
Replacement profile9
Current profile10'''William Glasgow''' was a burgess of Glasgow. He was married to [[Brade-232|Esbell Brade]], and their son [[Glasgow-1093|John Glasgow]] is directly identified in two independent property records.
Replacement profile10'''William Glasgow''' was a burgess of Glasgow. He was married to [[Brade-232|Esbell Brade]], and their son [[Glasgow-1093|John Glasgow]] is directly identified in two independent property records.
Current profile11
Replacement profile11
Current profile12A William Glasgow was among the men granted a royal remission on 2 July 1526 for the killing of James Somervile and other offences.<ref name="remission1526">[https://archive.org/stream/registrumsecret00scotgoog/registrumsecret00scotgoog_djvu.txt ''Registrum Secreti Sigilli Regum Scotorum'', vol. 1, entry 3412], 2 July 1526.</ref> The entry gives no residence, occupation or relationship by which to distinguish him, so identification with the later burgess remains possible rather than certain.
Replacement profile12A William Glasgow was among the men granted a royal remission on 2 July 1526 for the killing of James Somervile and other offences.<ref name="remission1526">[https://archive.org/stream/registrumsecret00scotgoog/registrumsecret00scotgoog_djvu.txt ''Registrum Secreti Sigilli Regum Scotorum'', vol. 1, entry 3412], 2 July 1526.</ref> The entry gives no residence, occupation or relationship by which to distinguish him, so identification with the later burgess remains possible rather than certain.
Current profile13
Replacement profile13
Current profile14On 28 February 1530/31 William Glasgow witnessed the sasine of property on Our Lady's Street to John Allason.<ref name="protocol1058">Robert Renwick, ed., [https://archive.org/stream/abstractsprotoc08robegoog/abstractsprotoc08robegoog_djvu.txt ''Abstracts of Protocols of the Town Clerks of Glasgow'', vol. 4, protocol 1058], 28 February 1530/31.</ref>
Replacement profile14On 28 February 1530/31 William Glasgow witnessed the sasine of property on Our Lady's Street to John Allason.<ref name="protocol1058">Robert Renwick, ed., [https://archive.org/stream/abstractsprotoc08robegoog/abstractsprotoc08robegoog_djvu.txt ''Abstracts of Protocols of the Town Clerks of Glasgow'', vol. 4, protocol 1058], 28 February 1530/31.</ref>
Current profile15
Replacement profile15
Current profile16On 31 December 1534 William, with Esbell's consent, resigned a back tenement in Glasgow to ''their son'' John Glasgow and John's wife [[Spreull-4|Jonet Spreull]], reserving the profits to himself and Esbell during their lives.<ref name="protocol1196">Renwick, [https://archive.org/details/abstractsprotoc08robegoog/page/n84/mode/2up ''Abstracts of Protocols'', vol. 4, protocol 1196], 31 December 1534, printed p. 72.</ref>
Replacement profile16On 31 December 1534 William, with Esbell's consent, resigned a back tenement in Glasgow to ''their son'' John Glasgow and John's wife [[Spreull-4|Jonet Spreull]], reserving the profits to himself and Esbell during their lives.<ref name="protocol1196">Renwick, [https://archive.org/details/abstractsprotoc08robegoog/page/n84/mode/2up ''Abstracts of Protocols'', vol. 4, protocol 1196], 31 December 1534, printed p. 72.</ref>
Current profile17
Replacement profile17
Current profile18=== The Rankin–Young property ===
Replacement profile18=== The Rankin–Young property ===
Current profile19
Replacement profile19
Current profile20The tenement can be placed within a stable group of adjoining properties. In 1527 [[Space:John_de_Glasgow_alias_Smith_/_John_Glasgow_of_Saltmarket'|an older John Glasgow]]'s tenement on the west side of the street from theMarket Cross to the South Port lay between John Rankin on the south and James Young on the north.<ref name="olderJohn1527">[https://archive.org/details/libercollegiino00annegoog ''Liber Collegii Nostre Domine''], act of 2 May 1527, pp. 85–86.</ref> On 20 February 1528/29—the date explicitly supplied in the edition's contents—Malcolm Henryson alias Makandoy sold the adjoining tenement, small garden and rear orchard to Master James Houston. Its fore boundaries were Andrew Craig south and William Glasgow north.<ref name="liber1528">[https://archive.org/download/libercollegiino00annegoog/page/n195_w1600.jpg ''Liber Collegii Nostre Domine'', p. 90] and [https://archive.org/download/libercollegiino00annegoog/page/n196_w1600.jpg p. 91], instrument dated 20 February 1528/29: ''inter tenementa ... Andree Craig exaustrali et Willelmi Glasgu ex boreali partibus''.</ref> This is the parcel later held by Rankin. On 17February 1534/35 Rankin's adjoining tenement was bounded by William Glasgow immediately to the north and Andrew Craig to the south.<ref name="protocol1201">Renwick, [https://archive.org/details/abstractsprotoc08robegoog/page/n85/mode/2up ''Abstracts of Protocols'', vol. 4, protocol 1201], 17 February 1534/35, printed pp. 73–74.</ref> On 16 March 1535/36 James Young's place was bounded by the lands of the ''late William Glasgow'' on the south and Robert Cochran on the north.<ref name="protocol1233">Renwick, [https://archive.org/details/abstractsprotoc08robegoog/page/n99/mode/2up ''Abstracts of Protocols'', vol. 4, protocol 1233], 16 March 1535/36, printed pp. 86–87, fol. 87.</ref> The St Andrew prebend rental, confirmed on 3 June 1542 and transumed on 8 January 1548/49, charged a four-shilling annual on the tenement of the late William Glasgow between the late John Crownar north and John Rankin south.<ref name="rent1542">[https://archive.org/download/libercollegiino00annegoog/page/n141_w1600.jpg ''Liber Collegii Nostre Domine'', St Andrew prebend, p. 36]: ''quatuor solidi annui redditus de tenemento quondam Wilelmi Glasgu ... inter tenementa quondam Johannis Crovnar ... et tenementum Johannis Rankyn''.</ref> This matches the four-shilling institutional burden on the older John's 1527 tenement.
Replacement profile20The tenement can be placed within a stable group of adjoining properties. In 1527 [[Space:John_de_Glasgow_alias_Smith_/_John_Glasgow_of_Saltmarket'|an older John Glasgow]]'s tenement on the west side of the street from theMarket Cross to the South Port lay between John Rankin on the south and James Young on the north.<ref name="olderJohn1527">[https://archive.org/details/libercollegiino00annegoog ''Liber Collegii Nostre Domine''], act of 2 May 1527, pp. 85–86.</ref> On 20 February 1528/29—the date explicitly supplied in the edition's contents—Malcolm Henryson alias Makandoy sold the adjoining tenement, small garden and rear orchard to Master James Houston. Its fore boundaries were Andrew Craig south and William Glasgow north.<ref name="liber1528">[https://archive.org/download/libercollegiino00annegoog/page/n195_w1600.jpg ''Liber Collegii Nostre Domine'', p. 90] and [https://archive.org/download/libercollegiino00annegoog/page/n196_w1600.jpg p. 91], instrument dated 20 February 1528/29: ''inter tenementa ... Andree Craig exaustrali et Willelmi Glasgu ex boreali partibus''.</ref> This is the parcel later held by Rankin. On 17February 1534/35 Rankin's adjoining tenement was bounded by William Glasgow immediately to the north and Andrew Craig to the south.<ref name="protocol1201">Renwick, [https://archive.org/details/abstractsprotoc08robegoog/page/n85/mode/2up ''Abstracts of Protocols'', vol. 4, protocol 1201], 17 February 1534/35, printed pp. 73–74.</ref> On 16 March 1535/36 James Young's place was bounded by the lands of the ''late William Glasgow'' on the south and Robert Cochran on the north.<ref name="protocol1233">Renwick, [https://archive.org/details/abstractsprotoc08robegoog/page/n99/mode/2up ''Abstracts of Protocols'', vol. 4, protocol 1233], 16 March 1535/36, printed pp. 86–87, fol. 87.</ref> The St Andrew prebend rental, confirmed on 3 June 1542 and transumed on 8 January 1548/49, charged a four-shilling annual on the tenement of the late William Glasgow between the late John Crownar north and John Rankin south.<ref name="rent1542">[https://archive.org/download/libercollegiino00annegoog/page/n141_w1600.jpg ''Liber Collegii Nostre Domine'', St Andrew prebend, p. 36]: ''quatuor solidi annui redditus de tenemento quondam Wilelmi Glasgu ... inter tenementa quondam Johannis Crovnar ... et tenementum Johannis Rankyn''.</ref> This matches the four-shilling institutional burden on the older John's 1527 tenement.
Current profile21
Replacement profile21
Current profile22The 1527 title, the 1528 Henryson/Houston boundary and the later rental identify William's holding as the same Rankin–Young parcel recorded under the older John's name in 1527. They place the transfer of the property title within about twenty-one and a half months. The rapid same-title succession makes a close family transfer, especially father to son, a strong possibility, although the surviving records donot name their relationship. William was described without the deceased qualifier on 17 February 1534/35 and as late on 16 March 1535/36, narrowing his death to that interval.
Replacement profile22The 1527 title, the 1528 Henryson/Houston boundary and the later rental identify William's holding as the same Rankin–Young parcel recorded under the older John's name in 1527. They place the transfer of the property title within about twenty-one and a half months. The rapid same-title succession makes a close family transfer, especially father to son, a strong possibility, although the surviving records donot name their relationship. William was described without the deceased qualifier on 17 February 1534/35 and as late on 16 March 1535/36, narrowing his death to that interval.
Current profile23
Replacement profile23
Current profile24On 28 October 1564 William's son John received sasine as William's heir in the fore tenement, still bounded by the late John Rankin to the south and Robert Young to the north.<ref name="protocol805">Renwick, [https://archive.org/details/abstractsprotoc06scogoog/page/n69/mode/2up ''Abstracts of Protocols'', vol. 3, protocol 805], 28 October 1564, printed p. 57.</ref> The inheritance directly confirms William as John's father and carries the same property into the next generation.
Replacement profile24On 28 October 1564 William's son John received sasine as William's heir in the fore tenement, still bounded by the late John Rankin to the south and Robert Young to the north.<ref name="protocol805">Renwick, [https://archive.org/details/abstractsprotoc06scogoog/page/n69/mode/2up ''Abstracts of Protocols'', vol. 3, protocol 805], 28 October 1564, printed p. 57.</ref> The inheritance directly confirms William as John's father and carries the same property into the next generation.
Current profile25
Replacement profile25
Current profile26The rear title also fits the 1534 family settlement. In 1563 John senior and Jonet Spreull conveyed their son John a tenement bounded by Robert Young, the late John Rankin and St Mary's collegiate-church land.<ref name="protocol748">Renwick, [https://archive.org/details/abstractsprotoc06scogoog/page/n52/mode/2up ''Abstracts of Protocols'', vol. 3, protocol 748], 13 May 1563.</ref> In 1564 Eufame Craig, widow of an unnamed Glasgow, sold her liferent in the corresponding back tenement to John senior.<ref name="protocol809">Renwick, [https://archive.org/details/abstractsprotoc06scogoog/page/n71/mode/2up ''Abstracts of Protocols'', vol. 3, protocols 809–810], 16 November 1564, printed pp. 58–59.</ref> The most likely reconstruction is that Eufame was the older John's widow and that her reserved liferent survived the rapid passage of the fee to William. This fits the layered title much better than making herWilliam's widow, which would require Esbell's death and William's remarriage within about fourteen months. The Craig witnesses and the same-day sale of the adjoining fore tenement to William Craig also suggest a coordinated family settlement. The sequence strongly identifies William and Esbell's 1534 back tenement as the rear portion of the Rankin–Young block. On 5 February 1565/66 William Craig conveyed the fore parcel to his son Archibald Craig and Archibald's wife Margaret Smith, with the late Rankin, Robert Young and JohnGlasgow's back-tenement boundaries unchanged.<ref name="protocol860">Renwick, [https://archive.org/details/abstractsprotoc06scogoog/page/n89/mode/2up ''Abstracts of Protocols'', vol. 3, protocol 860], 5 February 1565/66, printed pp. 77–78.</ref>
Replacement profile26The rear title also fits the 1534 family settlement. In 1563 John senior and Jonet Spreull conveyed their son John a tenement bounded by Robert Young, the late John Rankin and St Mary's collegiate-church land.<ref name="protocol748">Renwick, [https://archive.org/details/abstractsprotoc06scogoog/page/n52/mode/2up ''Abstracts of Protocols'', vol. 3, protocol 748], 13 May 1563.</ref> In 1564 Eufame Craig, widow of an unnamed Glasgow, sold her liferent in the corresponding back tenement to John senior.<ref name="protocol809">Renwick, [https://archive.org/details/abstractsprotoc06scogoog/page/n71/mode/2up ''Abstracts of Protocols'', vol. 3, protocols 809–810], 16 November 1564, printed pp. 58–59.</ref> The most likely reconstruction is that Eufame was the older John's widow and that her reserved liferent survived the rapid passage of the fee to William. This fits the layered title much better than making herWilliam's widow, which would require Esbell's death and William's remarriage within about fourteen months. The Craig witnesses and the same-day sale of the adjoining fore tenement to William Craig also suggest a coordinated family settlement. The sequence strongly identifies William and Esbell's 1534 back tenement as the rear portion of the Rankin–Young block. On 5 February 1565/66 William Craig conveyed the fore parcel to his son Archibald Craig and Archibald's wife Margaret Smith, with the late Rankin, Robert Young and JohnGlasgow's back-tenement boundaries unchanged.<ref name="protocol860">Renwick, [https://archive.org/details/abstractsprotoc06scogoog/page/n89/mode/2up ''Abstracts of Protocols'', vol. 3, protocol 860], 5 February 1565/66, printed pp. 77–78.</ref>
Current profile27
Replacement profile27
Current profile28== Research Notes ==
Replacement profile28== Research Notes ==
Current profile29
Replacement profile29
Current profile30The consolidated Brady/Brade research relevant to this profile is maintained at [[Space:Brady Family of Sauchie, Stirling & Easter Kennet — Research Notes|Brady Family of Stirling and Easter Kennet — Research Notes]].
Replacement profile30The consolidated Brady/Brade research relevant to this profile is maintained at [[Space:Brady Family of Sauchie, Stirling & Easter Kennet — Research Notes|Brady Family of Stirling and Easter Kennet — Research Notes]].
Current profile31
Replacement profile31
Current profile32William's birth date, birth place and death place are not recorded. His documented death interval is 17 February 1534/35 to 16 March 1535/36.
Replacement profile32William's birth date, birth place and death place are not recorded. His documented death interval is 17 February 1534/35 to 16 March 1535/36.
Current profile33
Replacement profile33
Current profile34The attached father, [[Glasgow-1095|John Glasgow]], remains uncertain and is not the maintained research account. The current sourced biography is [[Space:John_de_Glasgow_alias_Smith_/_John_Glasgow_of_Saltmarket'|John Glasgow of Saltmarket (c.1480–before 1553)]]. His exact title passing to William within about twenty-one and a half months makes a father-son relationship the leading genealogical hypothesis. The missing conveyance could still record a sale, assignment, tenancy or another family relationship. === Child and collateral assessment ===
Replacement profile34The attached father, [[Glasgow-1095|John Glasgow]], remains uncertain and is not the maintained research account. The current sourced biography is [[Space:John_de_Glasgow_alias_Smith_/_John_Glasgow_of_Saltmarket'|John Glasgow of Saltmarket (c.1480–before 1553)]]. His exact title passing to William within about twenty-one and a half months makes a father-son relationship the leading genealogical hypothesis. The missing conveyance could still record a sale, assignment, tenancy or another family relationship. === Child and collateral assessment ===
Current profile35
Replacement profile35
Current profile36Only [[Glasgow-1093|John]] is explicitly named as William's son. The other attachedrelationships remain uncertain, but the property reconstruction now distinguishes two probable burgh placements from the weaker Ayrshire and daughter hypotheses.
Replacement profile36Only [[Glasgow-1093|John]] is explicitly named as William's son. The other attachedrelationships remain uncertain, but the property reconstruction now distinguishes two probable burgh placements from the weaker Ayrshire and daughter hypotheses.
Current profile37
Replacement profile37
Current profile38{| class="wikitable sortable" style="padding: 5px; width:100%;"
Replacement profile38{| class="wikitable sortable" style="padding: 5px; width:100%;"
Current profile39|+ '''Attached children and current evidence'''
Replacement profile39|+ '''Attached children and current evidence'''
Current profile40|-
Replacement profile40|-
Current profile41! style="background-color:#E1F0B4;" | Person
Replacement profile41! style="background-color:#E1F0B4;" | Person
Current profile42! style="background-color:#E1F0B4;" | Assessment
Replacement profile42! style="background-color:#E1F0B4;" | Assessment
Current profile43! style="background-color:#E1F0B4;" | Basis
Replacement profile43! style="background-color:#E1F0B4;" | Basis
Current profile44|-
Replacement profile44|-
Current profile45| [[Glasgow-1093|John Glasgow]] || '''Documented son''' || Named as William and Esbell's son in 1534 and served heir to William in 1564.<ref name="protocol1196"/><ref name="protocol805"/>
Replacement profile45| [[Glasgow-1093|John Glasgow]] || '''Documented son''' || Named as William and Esbell's son in 1534 and served heir to William in 1564.<ref name="protocol1196"/><ref name="protocol805"/>
Current profile46|-
Replacement profile46|-
Current profile47| [[Glasgow-1096|Robert Glasgow]] || '''Probable son; relationship remains uncertain''' || Robert repeatedly shared the compact south-burgh property and fisher network of William's proved son John in 1557-73. Their lands bounded the same tenements, and they were described together as fishers in 1573.<ref name="RobertJohn">Renwick, ''Abstracts of Protocols'', vol. 2, protocols 401 and 403, [https://archive.org/details/abstractsprotoc08scogoog/page/n57/mode/2up 8 and 26 November 1557], and protocol544, [https://archive.org/details/abstractsprotoc08scogoog/page/n98/mode/2up 18 April 1560]; vol. 7, protocol 2002, [https://archive.org/details/abstractsprotoc00robegoog/page/n52/mode/2up 19 December 1573].</ref>
Replacement profile47| [[Glasgow-1096|Robert Glasgow]] || '''Probable son; relationship remains uncertain''' || Robert repeatedly shared the compact south-burgh property and fisher network of William's proved son John in 1557-73. Their lands bounded the same tenements, and they were described together as fishers in 1573.<ref name="RobertJohn">Renwick, ''Abstracts of Protocols'', vol. 2, protocols 401 and 403, [https://archive.org/details/abstractsprotoc08scogoog/page/n57/mode/2up 8 and 26 November 1557], and protocol544, [https://archive.org/details/abstractsprotoc08scogoog/page/n98/mode/2up 18 April 1560]; vol. 7, protocol 2002, [https://archive.org/details/abstractsprotoc00robegoog/page/n52/mode/2up 19 December 1573].</ref>
Current profile48|-
Replacement profile48|-
Current profile49| [[Glasgow-1097|Archibald Glasgow]] || '''Probable son; relationship remains uncertain''' || Robert witnessed Archibald's 1551 purchase of the parcel immediately east of Thomas Bargill; that exact east boundary belonged to John by 1554/55 and remained his in 1556-57.<ref name="ArchibaldParcel">Renwick, ''Abstracts of Protocols'', vol. 1, protocol 84, [https://archive.org/details/abstractsprotoc07robegoog/page/n59/mode/2up 21 May 1551], and protocol 205, [https://archive.org/details/abstractsprotoc07robegoog/page/n97/mode/2up 31 January 1554/55]; vol. 2, protocols 307 and 402, [https://archive.org/details/abstractsprotoc08scogoog/page/n29/mode/2up 5 August 1556] and [https://archive.org/details/abstractsprotoc08scogoog/page/n57/mode/2up 22 November 1557].</ref>
Replacement profile49| [[Glasgow-1097|Archibald Glasgow]] || '''Probable son; relationship remains uncertain''' || Robert witnessed Archibald's 1551 purchase of the parcel immediately east of Thomas Bargill; that exact east boundary belonged to John by 1554/55 and remained his in 1556-57.<ref name="ArchibaldParcel">Renwick, ''Abstracts of Protocols'', vol. 1, protocol 84, [https://archive.org/details/abstractsprotoc07robegoog/page/n59/mode/2up 21 May 1551], and protocol 205, [https://archive.org/details/abstractsprotoc07robegoog/page/n97/mode/2up 31 January 1554/55]; vol. 2, protocols 307 and 402, [https://archive.org/details/abstractsprotoc08scogoog/page/n29/mode/2up 5 August 1556] and [https://archive.org/details/abstractsprotoc08scogoog/page/n57/mode/2up 22 November 1557].</ref>
Current profile50|-
Replacement profile50|-
Current profile51| [[Glasgow-1168|James Glasgow elder]] || '''Possible son; weak evidence''' || Chronology permits the relationship and the Glencairn network links Ayrshire tenants with Glasgow burgesses, but no property, household or kinship record joins James at Corsankell to William.
Replacement profile51| [[Glasgow-1168|James Glasgow elder]] || '''Possible son; weak evidence''' || Chronology permits the relationship and the Glencairn network links Ayrshire tenants with Glasgow burgesses, but no property, household or kinship record joins James at Corsankell to William.
Current profile52|-
Replacement profile52|-
Current profile53| [[Glasgow-3915|Elizabeth Glasgow]] || '''Possible daughter or close female kinswoman; exact degree unresolved''' || William and Elizabeth's husband Alexander Kano/Kaine were named consecutively in the 1526 Sandilands of Calder remission. By 1552 Elizabeth, Alexander's widow, occupied Easter Corswood in the same Calder estate. Daughter, sister and niece remain viable.<ref name="ElizabethKaine">National Records of Scotland, Papers of Lord Torphichen, [https://catalogue.nrscotland.gov.uk/nrsonlinecatalogue/browseDetails.aspx?reference=GD119%2F193 GD119/193], 2 July 1526; John Maitland Thomson, ed., ''Registrum Magni Sigilli Regum Scotorum'', vol. 4, no. 739, [https://archive.org/details/registrummagnisi04scot/page/164/mode/1up p. 164], 19 December 1552.</ref>
Replacement profile53| [[Glasgow-3915|Elizabeth Glasgow]] || '''Possible daughter or close female kinswoman; exact degree unresolved''' || William and Elizabeth's husband Alexander Kano/Kaine were named consecutively in the 1526 Sandilands of Calder remission. By 1552 Elizabeth, Alexander's widow, occupied Easter Corswood in the same Calder estate. Daughter, sister and niece remain viable.<ref name="ElizabethKaine">National Records of Scotland, Papers of Lord Torphichen, [https://catalogue.nrscotland.gov.uk/nrsonlinecatalogue/browseDetails.aspx?reference=GD119%2F193 GD119/193], 2 July 1526; John Maitland Thomson, ed., ''Registrum Magni Sigilli Regum Scotorum'', vol. 4, no. 739, [https://archive.org/details/registrummagnisi04scot/page/164/mode/1up p. 164], 19 December 1552.</ref>
Current profile54|-
Replacement profile54|-
Current profile55| [[Glasgow-3916|Isobella Glasgow]] || '''Probable daughter; relationships remain uncertain''' || Her husband Archibald Herbisoune witnessed John sell the exact fore tenement John had entered nineteen days earlier as heir of William. Isobella also repeats proposed mother Esbell/Isobel's forename. The witness act does not state kinship, so this is strong circumstantial rather than direct evidence.<ref name="IsobellaNetwork">Renwick, ''Abstracts of Protocols'', vol. 3, protocol 805, [https://archive.org/details/abstractsprotoc06scogoog/page/n69/mode/2up 28 October 1564], and protocol 810, [https://archive.org/details/abstractsprotoc06scogoog/page/n71/mode/2up 16 November 1564].</ref>
Replacement profile55| [[Glasgow-3916|Isobella Glasgow]] || '''Probable daughter; relationships remain uncertain''' || Her husband Archibald Herbisoune witnessed John sell the exact fore tenement John had entered nineteen days earlier as heir of William. Isobella also repeats proposed mother Esbell/Isobel's forename. The witness act does not state kinship, so this is strong circumstantial rather than direct evidence.<ref name="IsobellaNetwork">Renwick, ''Abstracts of Protocols'', vol. 3, protocol 805, [https://archive.org/details/abstractsprotoc06scogoog/page/n69/mode/2up 28 October 1564], and protocol 810, [https://archive.org/details/abstractsprotoc06scogoog/page/n71/mode/2up 16 November 1564].</ref>
Current profile56|}
Replacement profile56|}
Current profile57
Replacement profile57
Current profile58John's sole heirship is consistent with male primogeniture and therefore does not exclude younger sons who acquired neighbouring holdings. Nevertheless, the missing transfers permit alternatives such as cousinship, and Robert's own son John complicates the later fisher references. Robert, Archibald and Isobella should remain attached as uncertain even though the accumulated evidence makes each placement probable.
Replacement profile58John's sole heirship is consistent with male primogeniture and therefore does not exclude younger sons who acquired neighbouring holdings. Nevertheless, the missing transfers permit alternatives such as cousinship, and Robert's own son John complicates the later fisher references. Robert, Archibald and Isobella should remain attached as uncertain even though the accumulated evidence makes each placement probable.
Current profile59
Replacement profile59
Current profile60A 1548 collegiate-church sasine repeats the older John Glasgow's name and the 1527 boundaries. It may preserve copied title language for the four-shilling annual rent rather than identify the person then in possession.
Replacement profile60A 1548 collegiate-church sasine repeats the older John Glasgow's name and the 1527 boundaries. It may preserve copied title language for the four-shilling annual rent rather than identify the person then in possession.
Current profile61
Replacement profile61
Current profile62No second published occurrence names Eufame Craig's deceased Glasgow husband. The property sequence nevertheless makes the older John her likeliest husband: her widow's liferent could have been reserved before his title passed to William and thensurvived over the rear parcel. William is a weaker alternative because it requires Esbell's death and a remarriage within about fourteen months. The original manuscripts are [https://catalogue.nrscotland.gov.uk/nrsonlinecatalogue/details.aspx?reference=NP1%2f5 NRS NP1/5] for the 1534–36 Michael Fleming protocols and [https://cityarchives.glasgowlife.org.uk/Record.aspx?src=CalmView.Catalog&id=B%2f10%2f1%2f3 Glasgow City Archives B/10/1/3], especially protocol 809at folio 54, for the blank husband's name. An independent textual control is catalogued by the NationalLibrary of Scotland as [https://manuscripts.nls.uk/repositories/2/archival_objects/12930 Adv.MS.9A.1.12], with microfilm Mf.Sec.MSS.156; it has not yet been inspected.
Replacement profile62No second published occurrence names Eufame Craig's deceased Glasgow husband. The property sequence nevertheless makes the older John her likeliest husband: her widow's liferent could have been reserved before his title passed to William and thensurvived over the rear parcel. William is a weaker alternative because it requires Esbell's death and a remarriage within about fourteen months. The original manuscripts are [https://catalogue.nrscotland.gov.uk/nrsonlinecatalogue/details.aspx?reference=NP1%2f5 NRS NP1/5] for the 1534–36 Michael Fleming protocols and [https://cityarchives.glasgowlife.org.uk/Record.aspx?src=CalmView.Catalog&id=B%2f10%2f1%2f3 Glasgow City Archives B/10/1/3], especially protocol 809at folio 54, for the blank husband's name. An independent textual control is catalogued by the NationalLibrary of Scotland as [https://manuscripts.nls.uk/repositories/2/archival_objects/12930 Adv.MS.9A.1.12], with microfilm Mf.Sec.MSS.156; it has not yet been inspected.
Current profile63
Replacement profile63
Current profile64== Sources ==
Replacement profile64== Sources ==
Current profile65<references />
Replacement profile65<references />
Full replacement WikiTree biography
Copy this complete text into the WikiTree biography editor. Removed lines appear red on the left; added lines appear green on the right. Apply any structured vital or relationship correction described in the update separately in WikiTree's data fields.