What we have learned
Latest findings
New records and supported corrections from the Glasgow research, newest first.
Dates show when evidence was found or reviewed. Each finding gives its sources and what remains uncertain.
The finding assessment applies to the statement in that row. A supported record fact does not confirm its identification with a linked WikiTree profile. Profile identification limits appear beside the person and in the research.
Use Assessment to find relationships that became certain. Read the historical audit and counts →
Dated research findings
1–50 of 516 findings · newest first
Finding supported Supported fact or correction Finding qualified The finding has a stated evidence or identification limit
| Found | People | Finding | Finding assessment | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Life details Alexander Hutcheson, tailor, was admitted as Edinburgh burgess on 22 June 1670, as apprentice to late Alexander Thomsone, tailor, with apprenticeship date 31 January 1655. | Finding qualified The identification with Eupham Glasgow’s 1671 groom is probable. Alexander Thomsone is the apprenticeship master, not a father; no parentage upgrade is claimed. | Read the research → | |
| Family relationships A property entry dated 3 February 1550/51 names David Mathy and Mergaret Androsoune as spouses, purchasing a barn at Powdrait. David Mathy also appears as a witness on 4 July 1554. | Finding qualified The named couple is explicit in the inspected printed abstract. Identity of the purchaser with the 1554 Glasgow burgess is probable; Matthew-330 and Anderson-3241 remain weak compatible profile candidates. |
| |
| Dates & places The Plattsburgh Sentinel reports Nancy Glasgow’s death at Plattsburgh on 31 October 1891, aged about 75, and her funeral at Peristrome Presbyterian church on the following Monday afternoon. | Finding qualified Original newspaper image inspected. Approximate age conflicts with Nancy’s will and census ages; the notice names no relatives or Irish birthplace. | Read the research → | |
| Family relationships The original birth entry names Jane Elder, born 27 April 1881 at Gortreighy, daughter of farmer Robert Elder and Jane formerly Calderwood. This identifies that parental couple and strengthens the separate Robert/Jane study; it does not yet prove Jane Calderwood as mother of all 1901/1911 siblings. | Finding qualified Inspected original record; profile identity remains qualified where stated. | Read the research → | |
| Family relationships The original 1901 return names James Elder 80, wife Mary 73, daughter Lizzie 25 and son William 23. William and Elizabeth are a proved sibling pair in 1911, aged 40 and 50. These are substantial original-record age conflicts, not index errors. Elder-3951 and Elder-3950 remain compatible together, while identifying the 1901 children with the 1911 pair and attaching the latter to Elder-3946 remains uncertain. | Finding qualified Inspected original record; profile identity remains qualified where stated. |
| |
| Family relationships The original 1901 Gortereghy return records Robert Elder, 65, widowed farmer, with Alex 27 and Robert 20 as sons and Eliza 22 and Margaretta 14 as daughters. The 1911 Alexander/Mary household explicitly records Robert as Alexander’s brother and Margaret as his sister. The combined names and locality strongly support continuity, with age differences retained. Robert Elder-7144 remains a qualified father identity; Robert/Mary Glasgow’s Gortahar household is separate. | Finding qualified Inspected original record; profile identity remains qualified where stated. |
| |
| Family relationships The original 1901 and 1911 returns establish continuity of Sarah McCaughern’s Gortereghy family. Sarah was a Derry-born widow aged 72/82; Caroline, Sarah J/Sara Jane, James A/Jas Alex, Matilda and grandson George occur in both returns. Elizabeth, 32, is also a daughter in 1901. Sarah Dysart-1893, married in 1851 to Gortereghy farmer John McCaughern, remains the strongest mother identity, but neither census names her deceased husband or maiden surname. | Finding qualified Inspected original record; profile identity remains qualified where stated. |
| |
| Family relationships The original 1911 Lisnagaver return identifies John Wallace, 55, National School Teacher born County Derry, with Antrim-born wife Mary Anne, 52; married 26 years, seven children born and six living. Their six resident children are Mary H, William G, James G, Samuel G, Sarah G and Letitia C. This strongly identifies the 1912 directory teacher. | Finding qualified Inspected original record; profile identity remains qualified where stated. | Read the research → | |
| Dates & places Rereading Rasharkin baptism transcription entry 125 gives Hugh Macaw’s birth as 3 February 1839, replacing the maintained 5 February wording. His baptism remains 3 March 1839; original manuscript inspection is required before treating the corrected transcription as a final date. | Finding qualified Named transcription reread; original manuscript uninspected. | Read the research → | |
| New records Original returns place Matilda Adair, 32, with four Adair sons and grandmother Ester Mulhollond in Monkstown Village, while Matilda M’Choland, 45, is a married daughter in Sarah McCaughern’s Gortereghy household on the same 1901 census night. Their different simultaneous family groups and ages distinguish Mulholland-1040 from the Gortereghy daughter. | Finding qualified Inspected original record; profile identity remains qualified where stated. |
| |
| Family relationships The original 1911 Dreen return names Peter McCaughern, 48, single Roman Catholic farmer, with his sister Agnes, 55. He is a concrete candidate for the 1912 Rasharkin grocer/farmer and later Dreen probate man, but the directory-to-household identification remains probable and no father is named. | Finding qualified Inspected original record; profile identity remains qualified where stated. | Read the research → | |
| Family relationships The original 1911 Lisnagaver return identifies Robert McCaughern, 54, farmer, with wife Mary Anne, 58; married 28 years, both Antrim-born Church of Ireland. The occupation and exact locality strongly identify the 1912 directory farmer. His parents are not stated. | Finding qualified Inspected original record; profile identity remains qualified where stated. | Read the research → | |
| Family relationships The original 1901 Gortereghy return describes Thomas Ross, 34, as farmer and flax miller, with Scotland-born wife Mary Jane and six children. This supplies an occupation bridge to the 1912 mill-owner directory entry; the 1911 return records 24 years of marriage and seven surviving children. Ross-13124 remains compatible; the reported census ages differ. | Finding qualified Inspected original record; profile identity remains qualified where stated. |
| |
| New records The printed Gray heading corrects the former John Glasgow attribution of the 1648 apprenticeship. The entry names John Gray’s deceased father Thomas Gray, maltman and burgess of Glasgow, and master William Blackwood. | Finding supported The original manuscript was not inspected. The printed record establishes the named father, while identification with Gray-42340 remains qualified. The former Glasgow profile candidates and Thomas Glasgow father hypothesis are withdrawn. | Read the research → | |
| Land & property PRONI estate account D1939/21/3 describes Thomas Glascoe buying Hugh Hamill’s mortgaged Lifford interest for £3,216, with Creighton and Hamilton as sureties, followed by litigation and Creighton’s purchase. | Finding qualified Official archival transcription inspected; original image unavailable. Purchased Lifford property is not demonstrated inheritance from Archibald’s Ramelton estate. Search the PRONI catalogue by D1939/21/3. | Read the research → | |
| New records Daneill Glasco witnesses Richard Johnson’s Norfolk will dated 26 February 1729/30, with Richard Linton and John Moy. The will was proved on 18 September 1730. | Finding qualified Printed will abstract inspected, not the original will manuscript. The witness’s identity with either Daniel profile is unresolved. No father or survival-to-probate inference. William Glasgow-428 is an associated research case and is not named in this entry. | Read the research → | |
| Dates & places Daniel Glasco personally acknowledged his deed in court on 3 September 1729, establishing that he was alive that day. A 1730 will witness abstract names Daneill Glasco with Richard Linton and John Moy. | Finding qualified The deed’s personal appearance, rather than registration alone, supplies the life boundary. The witness network supports comparison, but identity with Glasgow-3322 and continuity with the 1693 Daniel/Mary couple remain qualified. McIntosh’s will abstract is printed p. 122, not p. 112. |
| |
| Life details John Bruce was recorded as a smith in the 1684-07-04 Edinburgh marriage to Marion Glasgow. The inspected edition presents this as a marriage date. | Finding supported Visually inspected historical printed transcription and editorial preface; original parish manuscript uninspected. Adult profile identifications remain qualified and each event is kept separate. |
| |
| Life details Alexander Hutcheson was recorded as a tailor in the 1671-12-08 Edinburgh marriage to Eupham Glasgow. The inspected edition presents this as a marriage date. | Finding supported Visually inspected historical printed transcription and editorial preface; original parish manuscript uninspected. Adult profile identifications remain qualified and each event is kept separate. |
| |
| Life details William Mitchell was recorded as a merchant in the 1675-12-16 Edinburgh marriage to Jean Glasgow. The inspected edition presents this as a marriage date. | Finding supported Visually inspected historical printed transcription and editorial preface; original parish manuscript uninspected. Adult profile identifications remain qualified and each event is kept separate. |
| |
| Life details George Cargill was recorded as a bookseller in the 1651-03-11 Edinburgh marriage to Alisone Glasgow. The inspected edition presents this as a marriage date. | Finding supported Visually inspected historical printed transcription and editorial preface; original parish manuscript uninspected. Adult profile identifications remain qualified and each event is kept separate. |
| |
| Life details John Rait was recorded as a tailor in the 1659-06-28 Edinburgh marriage to Marione Glasgow. The inspected edition presents this as a marriage date. | Finding supported Visually inspected historical printed transcription and editorial preface; original parish manuscript uninspected. Adult profile identifications remain qualified and each event is kept separate. |
| |
| Life details John Williamson was recorded as a cordiner in the 1672-11-14 Edinburgh marriage to Alison Glasgow. The inspected edition presents this as a marriage date. | Finding supported Visually inspected historical printed transcription and editorial preface; original parish manuscript uninspected. Adult profile identifications remain qualified and each event is kept separate. |
| |
| Land & property Daniel Glasco, Norfolk planter, conveyed 100 acres to Richard Linton with the consent of Mary, explicitly his wife. The court endorsement says Daniel personally acknowledged the deed on 3 September 1729, establishing survival to that date. | Finding qualified Inspected original deed endorsement. No father is stated; profile identification and the earlier William title recital remain qualified. Registration alone is not used as a life boundary. | Read the research → | |
| Life details Neal Anderson’s Gortereghy household and 1893 Sarah Elder marriage match Anderson-47669. The 1886 Rasharkin John Elder–Annie Patterson marriage matches Elder-5907. Mary Ellen’s 1867 birth is the record already cited on Glasgow-4269. | Finding supported John’s 1842 namesake remains a separate identity review; the 1912 grocer identification is compatible. Mary Ellen’s original entry 214 reads 14 February, where the cited GRONI index and current profile say 17 February. The correction is drafted and pending; mother and informant identities remain qualified. No new parent confidence transition is claimed. |
| |
| Life details The existing profiles John Glasgow-2952 and Anne Glasgow-2874 represent the Montgreenan son and Robertson wife in the maintained family account. Amelia Wilson-3789 is John’s sister and is distinct from his housekeeper Amelia Theobalds-120. | Finding qualified Read-only comparison of current public biographies and published archival research. The trust’s Emilia identification, maternal claims and inferred household relationships remain qualified; no new parent-confidence change or live save is claimed. |
| |
| Life details The 1665 Edinburgh Alexander Glasgow–Isobell Anderson entry matches Glasgow-1152 and Anderson-56713; the 1676 Kirknewton and East Calder Anna Glasgow–Thomas Gray entry matches Glasgow-1439 and Grey-2711. | Finding supported Current reciprocal spouse biographies identify the existing couples. The official supplied index was reviewed; original register images remain uninspected and its event type may be banns or marriage. These are already-attached spouses, not newly certain parent relationships. |
| |
| Life details Three stale creation drafts are already represented: the accepted Marjory reading maps to Glasgow-3589, Marion of Corsoun to Glasgow-4095, and Robert of Corsoun to Glasgow-4006. Their duplicate creation drafts have been retired. | Finding supported Existing record-defined profiles checked against the maintained testament transcriptions and public biographies. The earlier Androw reading is superseded. This reconciliation adds no new certainty transition or later adult identification. | Read the research → | |
| Family relationships The 9 November 1860 Old Monkland marriage index names William Sneddon’s parents as Robert Sneddon and Mary Gray Sneddon. William is indexed as a 45-year-old widowed collier. | Finding qualified The FamilySearch index was inspected after sign-in; its original image requires a FamilySearch centre or affiliate library and was not inspected. Sneddon-710 remains a candidate with an age discrepancy. No existing-profile father-confidence upgrade is claimed. |
| |
| Family relationships Betham’s abstract of Archibald Glasgow of Rathmalton, clerk, whose will was dated April 1673, names his wife Elizabeth, Thomas Glasgow as eldest son and Margaret as only daughter. Margaret’s husband is an unnamed Cairns, and Thomas Cairns is her son. | Finding qualified Betham’s pre-destruction derivative abstract was inspected, not the original will. The father–son statement is explicit; identification of the son with Glasgow-3556 remains strongly probable, with no residence or estate bridge. Elizabeth’s surname remains provisional. | Read the research → | |
| Family relationships The 9 November 1860 Old Monkland marriage index records Mary Thomson, 37, and William Sneddon, 45, a widowed collier. Her parents are Robert Thomson and Mary Glasgon Thomson; his parents are Robert Sneddon and Mary Gray Sneddon. | Finding qualified FamilySearch index inspected after sign-in; original image requires a centre or affiliate library and remains uninspected. These indexes describe one event, not independent marriages. The linked mother, bride and groom profiles remain candidates; no Irish origin, Nancy relationship or profile parentage is proved. |
| |
| New records Nancy Glasgow’s original probate docket records a guardian for minor heirs, Cabell McLean’s appointment as collateral inheritance tax appraiser in March 1894, and the report filed on 28 April 1894. | Finding supported The docket supplies no heir schedule or parent statement; the ward and exact March day are not securely read. | Read the research → | |
| Family relationships William Bryse’s father relationship to Bryse-15 was recorded as Confident in the dated profile review. The 1613 Linlithgow christening names John Bryse as father; the live audit records the exact status change. | Finding supported Historical confidence review of existing citations; no new source-image inspection is claimed in this backfill. Specific attached father–child pair; later-life identity questions are assessed separately. Father relationship became certain William Bryse (Bryse-13) — father: John Bryse (Bryse-15). Uncertain → Certain. The 1613 Linlithgow christening names John Bryse as father; the live audit records the exact status change. | Read the research → | |
| Family relationships John Glasgow’s father relationship to Robert Glasgow was recorded as Confident in the dated profile review. Ninian’s 1596 burgess admission names Robert as father and his 1613 testament names John as brother; surname, chronology and the 1619 witness support the common-father inference. Confidence applies to the record-defined brother represented by Glasgow-1030; identification with the 1618 Jonet Mathie husband remains probable. | Finding supported Historical confidence review of existing citations; no new source-image inspection is claimed in this backfill. Record-defined brother; later marriage identity remains probable Confidence rests on the stated supported inference or compiled evidence, rather than a new direct parent clause. Father relationship became certain John Glasgow (Glasgow-1030; record-defined Ninian brother mapping) — father: Robert Glasgow (Glasgow-1096). Uncertain → Certain. Ninian’s 1596 burgess admission names Robert as father and his 1613 testament names John as brother; surname, chronology and the 1619 witness support the common-father inference. Confidence applies to the record-defined brother represented by Glasgow-1030; identification with the 1618 Jonet Mathie husband remains probable. |
| |
| Family relationships Elspeth Glasgow’s father relationship to David Glasgow was recorded as Confident in the dated profile review. The Mid Calder baptism index of 2 March 1606 names David Glasgow as father; NRS OPR 694/10/9. | Finding supported The previous WikiTree father grade was unmarked, not explicitly uncertain. This is the documented move to Confident; no earlier unknown relationship is invented. Historical confidence review of existing citations; no new source-image inspection is claimed in this backfill. Specific attached father–child pair; later-life identity questions are assessed separately. Father relationship became certain Glasgow-1054 — father: Glasgow-1028. Unmarked (previously ungraded) → Certain. The Mid Calder baptism index of 2 March 1606 names David Glasgow as father; NRS OPR 694/10/9. | Read the research → | |
| Family relationships John Glasgow’s father relationship to James Glasgow was recorded as Confident in the dated profile review. The Mid Calder baptism index of 18 February 1616 names James Glasgow as father; NRS OPR 694/10/28. Later adult identities are assessed separately. | Finding supported The previous WikiTree father grade was unmarked, not explicitly uncertain. This is the documented move to Confident; no earlier unknown relationship is invented. Historical confidence review of existing citations; no new source-image inspection is claimed in this backfill. Specific attached father–child pair; later-life identity questions are assessed separately. Father relationship became certain Glasgow-1084 — father: Glasgow-991. Unmarked (previously ungraded) → Certain. The Mid Calder baptism index of 18 February 1616 names James Glasgow as father; NRS OPR 694/10/28. Later adult identities are assessed separately. | Read the research → | |
| Family relationships Issobell Glasgow’s father relationship to David Glasgow was recorded as Confident in the dated profile review. The Mid Calder baptism index of 3 May 1612 names David Glasgow as father; NRS OPR 694/10/21. | Finding supported The previous WikiTree father grade was unmarked, not explicitly uncertain. This is the documented move to Confident; no earlier unknown relationship is invented. Historical confidence review of existing citations; no new source-image inspection is claimed in this backfill. Specific attached father–child pair; later-life identity questions are assessed separately. Father relationship became certain Glasgow-1085 — father: Glasgow-1028. Unmarked (previously ungraded) → Certain. The Mid Calder baptism index of 3 May 1612 names David Glasgow as father; NRS OPR 694/10/21. | Read the research → | |
| Family relationships George Glasgow’s father relationship to John Glasgow was recorded as Confident in the dated profile review. The Glasgow 1627 baptism names John Glasgow and Jonet Mathie as the lawful child’s parents; High Kirk baptisms, vol.2/436. | Finding supported The previous WikiTree father grade was unmarked, not explicitly uncertain. This is the documented move to Confident; no earlier unknown relationship is invented. Historical confidence review of existing citations; no new source-image inspection is claimed in this backfill. Specific attached father–child pair; later-life identity questions are assessed separately. Father relationship became certain Glasgow-1090 — father: Glasgow-1030. Unmarked (previously ungraded) → Certain. The Glasgow 1627 baptism names John Glasgow and Jonet Mathie as the lawful child’s parents; High Kirk baptisms, vol.2/436. | Read the research → | |
| Family relationships Cristiane Glasgow’s father relationship to Edward Glasgow was recorded as Confident in the dated profile review. The Inveresk and Musselburgh baptism index of 1 May 1609 names Eduard Glasgow as father; NRS OPR 689/10/19. | Finding supported The previous WikiTree father grade was unmarked, not explicitly uncertain. This is the documented move to Confident; no earlier unknown relationship is invented. Historical confidence review of existing citations; no new source-image inspection is claimed in this backfill. Specific attached father–child pair; later-life identity questions are assessed separately. Father relationship became certain Glasgow-2456 — father: Glasgow-1557. Unmarked (previously ungraded) → Certain. The Inveresk and Musselburgh baptism index of 1 May 1609 names Eduard Glasgow as father; NRS OPR 689/10/19. | Read the research → | |
| Family relationships Isobel Glasgow’s father relationship to Andrew Glasgow was recorded as Confident in the dated profile review. Andrew’s CC8/8/32 testament names Isobel among his daughters; the live audit records uncertain→confident. The later Edinburgh bride identity remains probable. | Finding supported Historical confidence review of existing citations; no new source-image inspection is claimed in this backfill. Specific attached father–child pair; later-life identity questions are assessed separately. Father relationship became certain Isobel Glasgow (Glasgow-3336; record-defined testament daughter) — father: Andrew Glasgow (Glasgow-3163). Uncertain → Certain. Andrew’s CC8/8/32 testament names Isobel among his daughters; the live audit records uncertain→confident. The later Edinburgh bride identity remains probable. | Read the research → | |
| Family relationships Agnes Glasgow’s father relationship to Glasgow-4152 was recorded as Confident in the dated profile review. Glasgow Commissary Court testament dative and inventory | Finding supported The previous WikiTree father grade was unmarked, not explicitly uncertain. This is the documented move to Confident; no earlier unknown relationship is invented. Historical confidence review of existing citations; no new source-image inspection is claimed in this backfill. Specific attached father–child pair; later-life identity questions are assessed separately. Father relationship became certain Glasgow-4151 — father: Glasgow-4152. Unmarked (previously ungraded) → Certain. Glasgow Commissary Court testament dative and inventory | Read the research → | |
| Family relationships Katherine Glasgow’s father relationship to Glasgow-4152 was recorded as Confident in the dated profile review. Glasgow Commissary Court testament dative and inventory | Finding supported The previous WikiTree father grade was unmarked, not explicitly uncertain. This is the documented move to Confident; no earlier unknown relationship is invented. Historical confidence review of existing citations; no new source-image inspection is claimed in this backfill. Specific attached father–child pair; later-life identity questions are assessed separately. Father relationship became certain Glasgow-4153 — father: Glasgow-4152. Unmarked (previously ungraded) → Certain. Glasgow Commissary Court testament dative and inventory | Read the research → | |
| Family relationships John Glassford’s father relationship to Glasfurd-11 was recorded as Confident in the dated profile review. Fasti and notarial context support the father link; the maintained assessment is strongly_supported, but the live correction is an exact uncertain→confident change. | Finding supported Historical confidence review of existing citations; no new source-image inspection is claimed in this backfill. Specific attached father–child pair; later-life identity questions are assessed separately. Confidence rests on the stated supported inference or compiled evidence, rather than a new direct parent clause. Father relationship became certain Rev. John Glassford (Glassford-289) — father: Patrick Glasfurd (Glasfurd-11). Uncertain → Certain. Fasti and notarial context support the father link; the maintained assessment is strongly_supported, but the live correction is an exact uncertain→confident change. | Read the research → | |
| Family relationships John Glassford’s father relationship to John Glassford was recorded as Confident in the dated profile review. The 6 July 1642 Edinburgh apprentice entry expressly calls John son of the late John Glassfuird, minister at Kilwinning; Grant, Register of Apprentices, p.71. | Finding supported The previous WikiTree father grade was unmarked, not explicitly uncertain. This is the documented move to Confident; no earlier unknown relationship is invented. Historical confidence review of existing citations; no new source-image inspection is claimed in this backfill. Specific attached father–child pair; later-life identity questions are assessed separately. Father relationship became certain Glassfuird-1 — father: Glassford-289. Unmarked (previously ungraded) → Certain. The 6 July 1642 Edinburgh apprentice entry expressly calls John son of the late John Glassfuird, minister at Kilwinning; Grant, Register of Apprentices, p.71. | Read the research → | |
| Family relationships George Hutcheson’s father relationship to Thomas Hutcheson was recorded as Confident in the dated profile review. W.H. Hill, Early Records of an Old Glasgow Family; History of Glasgow, ch.XX | Finding supported The previous WikiTree father grade was unmarked, not explicitly uncertain. This is the documented move to Confident; no earlier unknown relationship is invented. Historical confidence review of existing citations; no new source-image inspection is claimed in this backfill. Specific attached father–child pair; later-life identity questions are assessed separately. Confidence rests on the stated supported inference or compiled evidence, rather than a new direct parent clause. Father relationship became certain Hutcheson-1648 — father: Hutcheson-1647. Unmarked (previously ungraded) → Certain. W.H. Hill, Early Records of an Old Glasgow Family; History of Glasgow, ch.XX | Read the research → | |
| Family relationships Thomas Hutcheson’s father relationship to Thomas Hutcheson was recorded as Confident in the dated profile review. W.H. Hill, Early Records of an Old Glasgow Family; History of Glasgow, ch.XX-XXI | Finding supported The previous WikiTree father grade was unmarked, not explicitly uncertain. This is the documented move to Confident; no earlier unknown relationship is invented. Historical confidence review of existing citations; no new source-image inspection is claimed in this backfill. Specific attached father–child pair; later-life identity questions are assessed separately. Confidence rests on the stated supported inference or compiled evidence, rather than a new direct parent clause. Father relationship became certain Hutcheson-1649 — father: Hutcheson-1647. Unmarked (previously ungraded) → Certain. W.H. Hill, Early Records of an Old Glasgow Family; History of Glasgow, ch.XX-XXI | Read the research → | |
| Family relationships Janet Hutcheson’s father relationship to George Hutcheson was recorded as Confident in the dated profile review. Biography reports the Glasgow kirk session's 1588 paternity admission by George Hutcheson for Janet; this is a direct father statement. | Finding supported The previous WikiTree father grade was unmarked, not explicitly uncertain. This is the documented move to Confident; no earlier unknown relationship is invented. Historical confidence review of existing citations; no new source-image inspection is claimed in this backfill. Specific attached father–child pair; later-life identity questions are assessed separately. Confidence rests on the stated supported inference or compiled evidence, rather than a new direct parent clause. Father relationship became certain Hutcheson-1650 — father: Hutcheson-1648. Unmarked (previously ungraded) → Certain. Biography reports the Glasgow kirk session's 1588 paternity admission by George Hutcheson for Janet; this is a direct father statement. | Read the research → | |
| Family relationships Janet Hutcheson’s father relationship to Thomas Hutcheson was recorded as Confident in the dated profile review. W.H. Hill, Early Records of an Old Glasgow Family; History of Glasgow, ch.XX | Finding supported The previous WikiTree father grade was unmarked, not explicitly uncertain. This is the documented move to Confident; no earlier unknown relationship is invented. Historical confidence review of existing citations; no new source-image inspection is claimed in this backfill. Specific attached father–child pair; later-life identity questions are assessed separately. Confidence rests on the stated supported inference or compiled evidence, rather than a new direct parent clause. Father relationship became certain Hutcheson-1654 — father: Hutcheson-1647. Unmarked (previously ungraded) → Certain. W.H. Hill, Early Records of an Old Glasgow Family; History of Glasgow, ch.XX | Read the research → | |
| Family relationships Elizabeth Hutcheson’s father relationship to Thomas Hutcheson was recorded as Confident in the dated profile review. Thomas Sr.'s biography, citing Early Records of an Old Glasgow Family and charter/sasine context, names Elizabeth among Thomas and Helen's five children; the same entry lists her marriage to James Pollok. | Finding supported The previous WikiTree father grade was unmarked, not explicitly uncertain. This is the documented move to Confident; no earlier unknown relationship is invented. Historical confidence review of existing citations; no new source-image inspection is claimed in this backfill. Specific attached father–child pair; later-life identity questions are assessed separately. Confidence rests on the stated supported inference or compiled evidence, rather than a new direct parent clause. Father relationship became certain Hutcheson-1655 — father: Hutcheson-1647. Unmarked (previously ungraded) → Certain. Thomas Sr.'s biography, citing Early Records of an Old Glasgow Family and charter/sasine context, names Elizabeth among Thomas and Helen's five children; the same entry lists her marriage to James Pollok. | Read the research → | |
| Family relationships James Johnstoun’s father relationship to Johnstoun-29 was recorded as Confident in the dated profile review. FamilySearch baptism index XTPH-QTG is cited for James, whose profile identifies George and Barbara as parents. | Finding supported The previous WikiTree father grade was unmarked, not explicitly uncertain. This is the documented move to Confident; no earlier unknown relationship is invented. Historical confidence review of existing citations; no new source-image inspection is claimed in this backfill. Specific attached father–child pair; later-life identity questions are assessed separately. Confidence rests on the stated supported inference or compiled evidence, rather than a new direct parent clause. Father relationship became certain Johnstoun-30 — father: Johnstoun-29. Unmarked (previously ungraded) → Certain. FamilySearch baptism index XTPH-QTG is cited for James, whose profile identifies George and Barbara as parents. | Read the research → |
No findings match those filters. Try another name or place, or reset the filters.
Undated findings remain on the person and family pages. Website change log →