Glasgow Surname Project

Individual research record

Andrew Glasgow

1720 – ?

Glasgow-3052 · 1 mapped association

Birthplace unknown→Death place unknown
View on mapOpen WikiTreeCompareReport a correction

At a glance

Identity & family

Tree links organise the family; documentary status still varies.

1Mapped records
3Close relations
2Evidence items
12Candidate leads
Birth
1720 · Place not recorded
Death
Not recorded · Place not recorded
Parents
James Glasgowuncertain
Spouses
Janet Clerk
Children
Alexander Glasgow
Gender
Male
WikiTree
Glasgow-3052
Research clusters
Scotland One-Tree profile leads
Mapped descendants
41

Comparison context

These child positions and checks are the subject details used to rank possible parents below.

Naming sequence used by the parentage model

Paternal grandfather positionAlexander Glasgow (1741)
Maternal grandfather positionNot identifiable from dated child profiles
Maternal grandmother positionNot identifiable from dated child profiles
Paternal grandmother positionNot identifiable from dated child profiles

Known-position checks: 0 support · 0 conflict. Ordinals retain unnamed children and recognise reused names.

Relationship comparison

Potential parents or duplicates

Compare scored leads with the subject details above—not proof.

Higher-signal leadReview carefullyWeak lead

Possible fathers5 leads

Automated fit55/100
Moderate Lead
Dates1703–?Generation17 years age gapRecorded placesKirknewton, Linlithgowshire, Scotland · Kirknewton — West LothianIndependent clue breadth · 9Age · Household · Indirect Multi-Factor Convergence · Rare Branch-Name Recurrence · Rare Name Bundle · Sex-Aware Ordered Naming · Spouse · Two-Generation · Undated LocalityCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • possible 17-year parent-child age gap (+10)
  • same specific indexed locality despite wider place-label differences: kirknewton west lothian (+10)
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming

a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving)

Show complete scoring
  • possible 17-year parent-child age gap (+10)
  • candidate's birth is 38 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1741), a marginal two-generation interval (+1)
  • same specific indexed locality despite wider place-label differences: kirknewton west lothian (+10)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • a known child was born within 1 years of the subject (+3)
  • known spouse Margaret (Moultrie) Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (20) at the subject's birth (+3)
  • candidate's name matches the first dated son Alexander Glasgow, the expected father position for a male subject (+6; catalogue rarity 1, Alexander in 59 profiles)
  • uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Alexander +7 (59 public profiles; subject branch: Alexander Glasgow, Alexander Glasgow; candidate branch: Alexander William Glasgow; +4 repetition bonus); Jean +5 (42 public profiles; subject branch: Jean Buchanan Glasgow; candidate branch: Jean Glasgow, Jean Glasgow; +2 repetition bonus); George +3 (61 public profiles; subject branch: George Glasgow; candidate branch: George Glasgow) (+23 total including +8 multi-name bonus)
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming

Deductions and cautions: a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving)

Automated fit48/100
Moderate Lead
Dates1692–?Generation28 years age gapRecorded placesKilwinning, Ayrshire, Scotland · Kilwinning — AyrshireIndependent clue breadth · 6Age · Rare Branch-Name Recurrence · Rare Name Bundle · Spouse · Spouse-Specific Child Window · Two-GenerationSame-spouse child windowJanet (Kilpatrick) GlasgowCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 28-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • known spouse Janet (Kilpatrick) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (30) at the subject's birth (+7)
  • candidate's birth is 49 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1741), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)

a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 28-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 49 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1741), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1710–1726) (+6; other parent Janet (Kilpatrick) Glasgow)
  • known spouse Janet (Kilpatrick) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (30) at the subject's birth (+7)
  • uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Janet +5 (43 public profiles; subject branch: Janet Glasgow; candidate branch: Janet Glasgow, Janet (Glasgow) Blackburn; +2 repetition bonus); Agnes +3 (46 public profiles; subject branch: Agnes Glasgow; candidate branch: Agnes Glasgow); Jean +3 (42 public profiles; subject branch: Jean Buchanan Glasgow; candidate branch: Jean Glasgow) (+19 total including +8 multi-name bonus)

Deductions and cautions: a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Show 3 lower-scoring possible fathers
Automated fit42/100
Moderate Lead
Dates1688–?Generation32 years age gapRecorded placesKirknewton, Linlithgowshire, Scotland · Kirknewton — West LothianIndependent clue breadth · 6Age · Household · Indirect Multi-Factor Convergence · Rare Branch-Name Recurrence · Two-Generation · Undated LocalityCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 32-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • same specific indexed locality despite wider place-label differences: kirknewton west lothian (+10)
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming

a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 32-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 53 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1741), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same specific indexed locality despite wider place-label differences: kirknewton west lothian (+10)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • a known child was born within 3 years of the subject (+3)
  • uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Helen +8 (28 public profiles; subject branch: Helen Glasgow; candidate branch: Helen Glasgow) (+8 total)
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming

Deductions and cautions: a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving)

Automated fit41/100
Moderate Lead
Dates1690–1764Generation30 years age gapRecorded placesKilbirnie, Ayrshire, Scotland · Irvine, Ayrshire, Scotland · Kilbirnie — AyrshireIndependent clue breadth · 6Age · Collateral Naming · Great-Grandparent Name Echo · Spouse · Spouse-Specific Child Window · Two-GenerationSame-spouse child windowAgnes (Ferguson) GlasgowCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 30-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 51 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1741), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • known spouse Agnes (Ferguson) Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (25) at the subject's birth (+3)

a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 30-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 51 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1741), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1718–1738) (+6; other parent Agnes (Ferguson) Glasgow)
  • known spouse Agnes (Ferguson) Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (25) at the subject's birth (+3)
  • candidate's sibling and niece/nephew network repeats names in the subject's descendant line (three rarest at most): Alexander +5 (59 public profiles; sibling Alexander Glasgow; +2 repetition bonus); Janet +5 (43 public profiles; niece/nephew Janet (Glasgow) Cochran, sibling Janet Glasgow; +2 repetition bonus); Jean +5 (42 public profiles; niece/nephew Jean Glasgow, sibling Jean Glasgow; +2 repetition bonus) (+15 total)
  • candidate's parents' names recur among the subject's grandchildren: Jean +1 (+1 total; weak multigeneration clue)

Deductions and cautions: a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Automated fit37/100
Weak Lead
Dates1708–1783Generationnominally 12 years; approximate dates permit about 16–22 years age gapRecorded placesCounty Antrim, Ireland · LarneIndependent clue breadth · 7Age · Broad Migration · Collateral Naming · Household · Rare Branch-Name Recurrence · Rare Name Bundle · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • the nominal 12-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (16–22 years) (+4)
  • a known child was born within 2 years of the subject (+3)
  • candidate's birth is 33 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1741), a marginal two-generation interval (+1)

a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Show complete scoring
  • the nominal 12-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (16–22 years) (+4)
  • candidate's birth is 33 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1741), a marginal two-generation interval (+1)
  • a known child was born within 2 years of the subject (+3)
  • uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Alexander +7 (59 public profiles; subject branch: Alexander Glasgow, Alexander Glasgow; candidate branch: Alexander Glasgow; +4 repetition bonus); George +5 (61 public profiles; subject branch: George Glasgow; candidate branch: George Glasgow, George Glasgow; +2 repetition bonus); Andrew +3 (31 public profiles; subject branch: Andrew Glasgow; candidate branch: Andrew Glasgow) (+23 total including +8 multi-name bonus)
  • candidate's sibling and niece/nephew network repeats names in the subject's descendant line (three rarest at most): Helen +8 (28 public profiles; niece/nephew Helen Glasgow); Jean +3 (42 public profiles; niece/nephew Jean Glasgow) (+11 total)
  • descendant branches share only a broad migration destination country (+1; weak alone): united states

Deductions and cautions: a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Possible mothers5 leads

Automated fit67/100
Strong Multi-Factor Lead
Dates1700–?Generation20 years age gapRecorded placesKirknewton — West LothianIndependent clue breadth · 8Age · Household · Indirect Multi-Factor Convergence · Rare Branch-Name Recurrence · Rare Name Bundle · Sex-Aware Ordered Naming · Two-Generation · Undated LocalityCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 20-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • same specific indexed locality despite wider place-label differences: kirknewton west lothian (+10)
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming

No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 20-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 41 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1741), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same specific indexed locality despite wider place-label differences: kirknewton west lothian (+10)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • a known child was born within 1 years of the subject (+3)
  • a candidate spouse matches the first dated son Alexander Glasgow, the expected father position (+4; Alexander in 59 profiles)
  • uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Alexander +7 (59 public profiles; subject branch: Alexander Glasgow, Alexander Glasgow; candidate branch: Alexander William Glasgow; +4 repetition bonus); Jean +5 (42 public profiles; subject branch: Jean Buchanan Glasgow; candidate branch: Jean Glasgow, Jean Glasgow; +2 repetition bonus); George +3 (61 public profiles; subject branch: George Glasgow; candidate branch: George Glasgow) (+23 total including +8 multi-name bonus)
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming

Deductions and cautions: No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required

Automated fit47/100
Moderate Lead
Dates1690–?Generation30 years age gapRecorded placesKilwinning, Ayrshire, Scotland · Kilwinning — AyrshireIndependent clue breadth · 5Age · Rare Branch-Name Recurrence · Rare Name Bundle · Spouse-Specific Child Window · Two-GenerationSame-spouse child windowHugh GlasgowCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 30-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 51 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1741), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)

locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 30-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 51 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1741), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1710–1726) (+6; other parent Hugh Glasgow)
  • uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Janet +5 (43 public profiles; subject branch: Janet Glasgow; candidate branch: Janet Glasgow, Janet (Glasgow) Blackburn; +2 repetition bonus); Agnes +3 (46 public profiles; subject branch: Agnes Glasgow; candidate branch: Agnes Glasgow); Jean +3 (42 public profiles; subject branch: Jean Buchanan Glasgow; candidate branch: Jean Glasgow) (+19 total including +8 multi-name bonus)

Deductions and cautions: locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Show 3 lower-scoring possible mothers
Automated fit47/100
Moderate Lead
Dates1688–?Generation32 years age gapRecorded placesAyrshire, Scotland · Ayrshire — exact locality unprovedIndependent clue breadth · 5Age · Rare Branch-Name Recurrence · Rare Name Bundle · Spouse-Specific Child Window · Two-GenerationSame-spouse child windowRobert GlasgowCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 32-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 53 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1741), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)

locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 32-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 53 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1741), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1716–1722) (+6; other parent Robert Glasgow)
  • uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: George +5 (61 public profiles; subject branch: George Glasgow; candidate branch: George Glasgow, George Glasgow; +2 repetition bonus); Agnes +3 (46 public profiles; subject branch: Agnes Glasgow; candidate branch: Agnes Glasgow); Jean +3 (42 public profiles; subject branch: Jean Buchanan Glasgow; candidate branch: Jean Glasgow) (+19 total including +8 multi-name bonus)

Deductions and cautions: locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Automated fit40/100
Moderate Lead
Dates1701–?Generationat least 19 years age gapRecorded placesKirknewton, Linlithgowshire, Scotland · Kirknewton — West LothianIndependent clue breadth · 5Age · Collateral Naming · Indirect Multi-Factor Convergence · Two-Generation · Undated LocalityCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • same specific indexed locality despite wider place-label differences: kirknewton west lothian (+10)
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming
  • candidate's birth is 40 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1741), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)

No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required

Show complete scoring
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at least 19 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
  • candidate's birth is 40 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1741), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same specific indexed locality despite wider place-label differences: kirknewton west lothian (+10)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • candidate's sibling and niece/nephew network repeats names in the subject's descendant line (three rarest at most): Alexander +5 (59 public profiles; niece/nephew Alexander Glasgow; +2 repetition bonus); Janet +3 (43 public profiles; niece/nephew Janet Glasgow); Jean +3 (42 public profiles; niece/nephew Jean Glasgow) (+11 total)
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming

Deductions and cautions: No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required

Automated fit39/100
Weak Lead
Dates1697–1723Generation23 years age gapRecorded placesKilbirnie, Ayrshire, Scotland · Glasgow, Scotland · Kilbirnie — AyrshireIndependent clue breadth · 4Age · Collateral Naming · Great-Grandparent Name Echo · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 23-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 44 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1741), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)

locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction); descendant-name recurrence has no independent household, record, migration or specific-locality anchor (score capped at 39)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 23-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 44 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1741), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • candidate's sibling and niece/nephew network repeats names in the subject's descendant line (three rarest at most): Janet +7 (43 public profiles; niece/nephew Janet (Glasgow) Cochran, niece/nephew Janet Glasgow; +4 repetition bonus); Alexander +5 (59 public profiles; sibling Alexander Glasgow; +2 repetition bonus); Jean +5 (42 public profiles; niece/nephew Jean Glasgow, sibling Jean Glasgow; +2 repetition bonus) (+17 total)
  • candidate's parents' names recur among the subject's grandchildren: Jean +1 (+1 total; weak multigeneration clue)

Deductions and cautions: locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction); descendant-name recurrence has no independent household, record, migration or specific-locality anchor (score capped at 39)

How parent leads are calculated

Automated leads use birth surnames—not married surnames—as parental eligibility, role-specific biological age limits, bounded and approximate-date uncertainty, household chronology, specific time-aware localities, mapped distance, tenancy succession, migration destinations and sex-aware Scottish naming positions across generations. People already attached as the subject's parents stay in the identity summary and are excluded from this alternative-candidate list, regardless of relationship confidence. The main calibration uses clues available on disconnected profiles; existing parent and sibling links are retained as comparison context rather than treated as transferable evidence. Common ordered names and grandparent-to-child echoes receive a small non-zero weight, so a John or James match can support several independent criteria without producing a lead alone. Rare names, repeated bearers and bundles across otherwise distinct branches receive substantially more weight according to catalogue frequency. An exact migration place is weighted by its rarity and repetition across both branches; a shared destination country is worth only one point. Extra weight is added only when at least three independent clue types converge: naming, locality, specific migration, household chronology or collateral networks. Sparse profiles retain a clearly labelled chronology-only fallback instead of disappearing. Countries, states, counties and research clusters do not count as a shared locality, and fallback, broad representative or kin-inferred coordinates are excluded from distance scoring. Shared descendant profiles are removed before branch-name comparison. A candidate already recorded as a parent-in-law is excluded. A confident or independently supported parent is treated as settled; uncertain and unassessed attachments remain open to alternative comparison. A different linked parent, an uncle/aunt or grandparent path, and a matching existing child profile prevent an alternative from being classified as a strong direct-parent lead until the underlying tree conflict or duplicate is resolved. Familiar forms such as Bessie are normalised. Surname remains an eligibility filter worth zero points.

Naming customs, shared farms and occupations are circumstantial. Children, spouses and collateral relatives may be missing, and tree-derived family networks are not independent evidence. Scores rank research leads; they do not prove parentage.

Same-name candidate

Andrew GlasgowGlasgow-1336

Automated fit62/100
Similar Person
Dates1714–?PlacesKirknewton, Linlithgowshire, ScotlandParent comparisonNo shared parent is indexed
Why it may fit
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 6 (+10)
  • shared recorded place (+20)

uncertain father attachments differ (no deduction)

Full comparison detail
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 6 (+10)
  • shared recorded place (+20)
  • matching child name: Alexander Glasgow

Conflicts: uncertain father attachments differ (no deduction)

Open side-by-side comparison

Same-name candidate

Andrew GlasgowGlasgow-1313

Automated fit40/100
Similar Person
Dates1703–?PlacesKirknewton, Linlithgowshire, ScotlandParent comparisonNo shared parent is indexed
Why it may fit
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 17 (+2)
  • shared recorded place (+20)

uncertain father attachments differ (no deduction)

Full comparison detail
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 17 (+2)
  • shared recorded place (+20)

Conflicts: uncertain father attachments differ (no deduction)

Open side-by-side comparison
How duplicate leads are calculated

Dates are eligibility gates, not merely deductions: chronologically impossible people are excluded. Dates, places, spouses, parent certainty and children's profiles and names are then compared. A high score is a prompt to inspect records, not a merge recommendation.

Open only what you need

Research & records

Life and record timelineChronological mapped occurrences and their underlying sources.1 record
b. 1720

Kin-inferred from spouse Janet Clerk’s birthplace: Kirknewton, Linlithgowshire, Scotland

Kirknewton — West Lothian

One-Tree export profile fields are search leads, not sources; relationships are shown only where the export supplies parent links. This map placement is an estimate from kin and is not a directly recorded location for this person.

Kin-inferred One-Tree profile leadunknown
Source and mapping detail

WikiTree profile export for Glasgow-3052

No sufficiently specific citation match found.

Precision: Kin-inferred relationship locality

Evidence assessmentWhat is supported, uncertain or disputed in the current case model.5 claims
2Tree Only

Documented or strongly supported

No claims in this category have been formally assessed.

Working hypotheses and conflicts

No claims in this category have been formally assessed.

Research questionsOpen problems, missing bridges and the next records to inspect.0 open

No formal open question is recorded for this person.

Sources and provenanceStructured citations and source-quality classifications.2 sources

Source or provenance: quality describes the record layer, not every conclusion drawn from it.

  1. tree_only https://www.familysearch.org/tree/person/sources/M5LQ-QCX
  2. tree_only WikiTree profile export for Glasgow-3052
Technical profile and raw captureDataset metadata, machine dossier and captured WikiTree biography.Advanced

WikiTree profile information

Dataset: ONT_Glasco_2026-08-18T16_05.json · generated 2026-08-20

Machine-readable dossier

WikiTree biography, citations and relationship snapshot

Glasgow-3052 was captured 2026-08-07T09:54:35+00:00; WikiTree profile revision 2024-09-20.

Immediate relationship snapshot

RelationshipPersonWikiTree IDDates and places returned
ParentsJames GlasgowGlasgow-15471702-09-09 · Kirknewton, Linlithgowshire, Scotland · 0000-00-00
ChildrenAlexander GlasgowGlasgow-13091741-03-09 · Kirknewton and East Calder, Midlothian, Scotland · 0000-00-00
SiblingsRobert GlasgowGlasgow-14451735-02-13 · Kirknewton and East Calder, Midlothian, Scotland · 0000-00-00
SpousesJanetClerk-3131720-00-00 · Kirknewton, Linlithgowshire, Scotland · 0000-00-00

Record-bearing passages

  • Research

    • Hypothetical person based on:
    • Another Andrew marries a Janet Clerk in the same area (and later in 1790 a John Glasgow marries an Ann Clerk in Lanark)
    • Couldnt be Andrew Glasgow and Isobel Clerk. son as an Alexander is born to an Andrew Glasgow and Janet Clerk in 1741 https://www.familysearch.org/tree/person/sources/M5LQ-QCX putting Andrew's birth around 1720 which matches Andrew Glasgow (abt.1714-)
    • Maybe Janet and Isobel are the same person?
    • Alternatively there are two Andrew's around the same age who are cousins and marry a Clerk in the same area. Sources

Profile source citations

  1. https://www.familysearch.org/tree/person/sources/M5LQ-QCX source link 1
Full captured biography text
Research
* Hypothetical person based on:
* Another Andrew marries a Janet Clerk in the same area (and later in 1790 a John Glasgow marries an Ann Clerk in Lanark)
* Couldnt be Andrew Glasgow and Isobel Clerk. son as an Alexander is born to an Andrew Glasgow and Janet Clerk in 1741 https://www.familysearch.org/tree/person/sources/M5LQ-QCX putting Andrew's birth around 1720 which matches Andrew Glasgow (abt.1714-)
* Maybe Janet and Isobel are the same person? 
* Alternatively there are two Andrew's around the same age who are cousins and marry a Clerk in the same area. 
Sources
Raw WikiTree biography markup
== Research ==

* Hypothetical person based on:
* Another Andrew marries a Janet Clerk in the same area (and later in 1790 a John Glasgow marries an Ann Clerk in Lanark)
* Couldnt be [[Glasgow-1336|Andrew Glasgow]] and [[Clerk-314|Isobel Clerk]]. son as an Alexander is born to an Andrew Glasgow and Janet Clerk in 1741<ref>https://www.familysearch.org/tree/person/sources/M5LQ-QCX</ref> putting Andrew's birth around 1720 which matches [[Glasgow-1336|Andrew Glasgow (abt.1714-)]]
* Maybe Janet and Isobel are the same person? 
* Alternatively there are two Andrew's around the same age who are cousins and marry a Clerk in the same area. 
== Sources ==
<references />