Skip to page content
Home/People/James Glasgow
Catalogue · 27 Sep 2026

Back to original page

Suggested profile text

WikiTree profile and prepared draft

WikiTree profile text

The prepared text for the public WikiTree profile, kept here so it can be compared with the current profile.

The prepared amendment is already on WikiTree; no pending biography change.

Compared with Glasgow-1168, captured 2026-09-27T21:57:25+00:00 · 2026-09-27.

Current captured WikiTree biography

Read-only capture used for the comparison above.

Side-by-side comparison of the live and replacement profiles

No biography changes in this draft.

Current profileReplacement profile
Current profile1[[Category:Stevenston, Ayrshire]]
Replacement profile1[[Category:Stevenston, Ayrshire]]
Current profile2
Replacement profile2
Current profile3[[Category:Glasgow Name Study]]
Replacement profile3[[Category:Glasgow Name Study]]
Current profile4
Replacement profile4
Current profile5== Biography ==
Replacement profile5== Biography ==
Current profile6
Replacement profile6
Current profile7'''James Glasgow''' was a tenant at Corsinkell in the parish and barony of Stevenston, Ayrshire. He was probably born about 1515, although his precise date and place of birth have not been identified.
Replacement profile7'''James Glasgow''' was a tenant at Corsinkell in the parish and barony of Stevenston, Ayrshire. He was probably born about 1515, although his precise date and place of birth have not been identified.
Current profile8
Replacement profile8
Current profile9The estimate is based on the presence of an adult or near-adult son, also named James, at Corsinkell by 1559–1560. It is an approximate generational estimate rather than a date stated in any record.
Replacement profile9The estimate is based on the presence of an adult or near-adult son, also named James, at Corsinkell by 1559–1560. It is an approximate generational estimate rather than a date stated in any record.
Current profile10
Replacement profile10
Current profile11=== Corsinkell ===
Replacement profile11=== Corsinkell ===
Current profile12
Replacement profile12
Current profile13A reconstructed list of Cunninghame teind debtors for 1559–1560 names Katherine Campbell, James Glasgow younger and James Glasgow elder under Corsinkell in Stevenston parish.<ref name="TeindList">Margaret H. B. Sanderson, [https://aanhs.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/people-of-ayrshire.pdf#page=36 “The People of Sixteenth Century Ayrshire,”] ''Ayrshire Collections'' 14, no. 8 (1987), appendix, “The Cunninghame Teind Lists of 1559–60,” printed p. 331, citing Register of Acts and Decreets, vol. 22, fols. 102v–167v.</ref>
Replacement profile13A reconstructed list of Cunninghame teind debtors for 1559–1560 names Katherine Campbell, James Glasgow younger and James Glasgow elder under Corsinkell in Stevenston parish.<ref name="TeindList">Margaret H. B. Sanderson, [https://aanhs.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/people-of-ayrshire.pdf#page=36 “The People of Sixteenth Century Ayrshire,”] ''Ayrshire Collections'' 14, no. 8 (1987), appendix, “The Cunninghame Teind Lists of 1559–60,” printed p. 331, citing Register of Acts and Decreets, vol. 22, fols. 102v–167v.</ref>
Current profile14
Replacement profile14
Current profile15The designations “elder” and “younger” establish that two men named James Glasgow were present at the same holding. That record alone does not state their relationship.
Replacement profile15The designations “elder” and “younger” establish that two men named James Glasgow were present at the same holding. That record alone does not state their relationship.
Current profile16
Replacement profile16
Current profile17On 9 February 1571 letters of reversion concerning an annual rent from the 40-shilling land of Corsinkell named the occupiers as James Glasgow elder, James Glasgow and John Glasgow, his sons, and Christian Campbell.<ref name="NRS1571">National Records of Scotland, Charter Chest of the Earls of Glencairn, [https://catalogue.nrscotland.gov.uk/nrsonlinecatalogue/details.aspx?reference=GD39%2F5%2F59 GD39/5/59], letters of reversion concerning annual rent from the 40-shilling land of Corsinkell, barony of Stevenston, sheriffdom of Ayr, dated 9 February 1571.</ref>
Replacement profile17On 9 February 1571 letters of reversion concerning an annual rent from the 40-shilling land of Corsinkell named the occupiers as James Glasgow elder, James Glasgow and John Glasgow, his sons, and Christian Campbell.<ref name="NRS1571">National Records of Scotland, Charter Chest of the Earls of Glencairn, [https://catalogue.nrscotland.gov.uk/nrsonlinecatalogue/details.aspx?reference=GD39%2F5%2F59 GD39/5/59], letters of reversion concerning annual rent from the 40-shilling land of Corsinkell, barony of Stevenston, sheriffdom of Ayr, dated 9 February 1571.</ref>
Current profile18
Replacement profile18
Current profile19This directly establishes that James elder had sons named James and John.
Replacement profile19This directly establishes that James elder had sons named James and John.
Current profile20
Replacement profile20
Current profile21=== Children ===
Replacement profile21=== Children ===
Current profile22
Replacement profile22
Current profile23James's record-confirmed sons were:
Replacement profile23James's record-confirmed sons were:
Current profile24
Replacement profile24
Current profile25* '''[[Glasgow-3921|James Glasgow, younger]]''', present with James elder at Corsinkell in 1559–1560 and explicitly identified as his son in 1571; and
Replacement profile25* '''[[Glasgow-3921|James Glasgow, younger]]''', present with James elder at Corsinkell in 1559–1560 and explicitly identified as his son in 1571; and
Current profile26* '''[[Glasgow-3193|John Glasgow]]''', the record-defined Corsinkell son explicitly identified in 1571.
Replacement profile26* '''[[Glasgow-3193|John Glasgow]]''', the record-defined Corsinkell son explicitly identified in 1571.
Current profile27
Replacement profile27
Current profile28[[Glasgow-3193|John Glasgow of the Kilwinning district]] remains a possible identity match for the record-defined son because Burrowland, Dalgarven and Corsinkell were all in northern Ayrshire. No reviewed deed connects those holdings, so Glasgow-3193 remains separate and his father link remains uncertain.
Replacement profile28[[Glasgow-3193|John Glasgow of the Kilwinning district]] remains a possible identity match for the record-defined son because Burrowland, Dalgarven and Corsinkell were all in northern Ayrshire. No reviewed deed connects those holdings, so Glasgow-3193 remains separate and his father link remains uncertain.
Current profile29
Replacement profile29
Current profile30[[Glasgow-3178|Agnes Glasgow]] was formerly attached as a daughter, but no reviewed source identifies her parents. The 1571 record names two sons and does not address daughters.
Replacement profile30[[Glasgow-3178|Agnes Glasgow]] was formerly attached as a daughter, but no reviewed source identifies her parents. The 1571 record names two sons and does not address daughters.
Current profile31
Replacement profile31
Current profile32=== Death ===
Replacement profile32=== Death ===
Current profile33
Replacement profile33
Current profile34James was living on 9 February 1571.<ref name="NRS1571" />
Replacement profile34James was living on 9 February 1571.<ref name="NRS1571" />
Current profile35
Replacement profile35
Current profile36His date and place of death have not been identified. The supported death statement is therefore '''after 9 February 1571, place unknown'''.
Replacement profile36His date and place of death have not been identified. The supported death statement is therefore '''after 9 February 1571, place unknown'''.
Current profile37
Replacement profile37
Current profile38A death date in or after November 1580 appears to derive from conflation with a different Glasgow family and should not be applied to this profile without additional evidence.
Replacement profile38A death date in or after November 1580 appears to derive from conflation with a different Glasgow family and should not be applied to this profile without additional evidence.
Current profile39
Replacement profile39
Current profile40== Research Notes ==
Replacement profile40== Research Notes ==
Current profile41
Replacement profile41
Current profile42=== Birth estimate ===
Replacement profile42=== Birth estimate ===
Current profile43
Replacement profile43
Current profile44The former estimate of about 1540 is too late.
Replacement profile44The former estimate of about 1540 is too late.
Current profile45
Replacement profile45
Current profile46James Glasgow younger was separately listed alongside James elder at Corsinkell in the 1559–1560 teind material.<ref name="TeindList" /> The 1571 record then directly identifies the younger James as the elder James's son.<ref name="NRS1571" />
Replacement profile46James Glasgow younger was separately listed alongside James elder at Corsinkell in the 1559–1560 teind material.<ref name="TeindList" /> The 1571 record then directly identifies the younger James as the elder James's son.<ref name="NRS1571" />
Current profile47
Replacement profile47
Current profile48If the younger James was at least about eighteen to twenty-one in 1559, he was born by approximately 1538–1541. Normal generational spacing would place his father's birth around 1510–1520.
Replacement profile48If the younger James was at least about eighteen to twenty-one in 1559, he was born by approximately 1538–1541. Normal generational spacing would place his father's birth around 1510–1520.
Current profile49
Replacement profile49
Current profile50About 1515 is used as an uncertain working estimate. A more conservative statement would be that James elder was born before about 1525.
Replacement profile50About 1515 is used as an uncertain working estimate. A more conservative statement would be that James elder was born before about 1525.
Current profile51
Replacement profile51
Current profile52=== Parentage ===
Replacement profile52=== Parentage ===
Current profile53
Replacement profile53
Current profile54'''[[Glasgow-1098|William Glasgow]]''' is attached as James's father.
Replacement profile54'''[[Glasgow-1098|William Glasgow]]''' is attached as James's father.
Current profile55
Replacement profile55
Current profile56The relationship is chronologically possible, but no inspected record connects William's Glasgow burgh family with James at Corsinkell. The attachment should remain uncertain and should not be described as proved.
Replacement profile56The relationship is chronologically possible, but no inspected record connects William's Glasgow burgh family with James at Corsinkell. The attachment should remain uncertain and should not be described as proved.
Current profile57
Replacement profile57
Current profile58'''[[Brade-232|Isobel Brade]]''' is attached as James's mother. No record cited on this profile establishes that relationship. It should likewise remain uncertain.
Replacement profile58'''[[Brade-232|Isobel Brade]]''' is attached as James's mother. No record cited on this profile establishes that relationship. It should likewise remain uncertain.
Current profile59
Replacement profile59
Current profile60The earlier attachment to [[Glasgow-1093|John Glasgow]] was unsupported and chronologically problematic.
Replacement profile60The earlier attachment to [[Glasgow-1093|John Glasgow]] was unsupported and chronologically problematic.
Current profile61
Replacement profile61
Current profile62=== Wife or Campbell associates ===
Replacement profile62=== Wife or Campbell associates ===
Current profile63
Replacement profile63
Current profile64Katherine Campbell was listed at Corsinkell with James elder and James younger in the 1559–1560 teind material.<ref name="TeindList" />
Replacement profile64Katherine Campbell was listed at Corsinkell with James elder and James younger in the 1559–1560 teind material.<ref name="TeindList" />
Current profile65
Replacement profile65
Current profile66Christian Campbell was named among the occupiers in the 1571 archival catalogue description.<ref name="NRS1571" />
Replacement profile66Christian Campbell was named among the occupiers in the 1571 archival catalogue description.<ref name="NRS1571" />
Current profile67
Replacement profile67
Current profile68Neither source states that either woman was James's wife, daughter or other relative. Katherine and Christian should not be assumed to be the same person, and neither should be attached as James's spouse without further evidence.
Replacement profile68Neither source states that either woman was James's wife, daughter or other relative. Katherine and Christian should not be assumed to be the same person, and neither should be attached as James's spouse without further evidence.
Current profile69
Replacement profile69
Current profile70=== Son James ===
Replacement profile70=== Son James ===
Current profile71
Replacement profile71
Current profile72The younger James named at Corsinkell is represented by '''[[Glasgow-3921|James Glasgow]]'''.
Replacement profile72The younger James named at Corsinkell is represented by '''[[Glasgow-3921|James Glasgow]]'''.
Current profile73
Replacement profile73
Current profile74The repeated holding, the elder/younger distinction and the 1571 statement of relationship make this identification well supported.
Replacement profile74The repeated holding, the elder/younger distinction and the 1571 statement of relationship make this identification well supported.
Current profile75
Replacement profile75
Current profile76Earlier links to [[Glasgow-991|James Glasgow]] should not be restored unless separate evidence shows that profile represents the Corsinkell son.
Replacement profile76Earlier links to [[Glasgow-991|James Glasgow]] should not be restored unless separate evidence shows that profile represents the Corsinkell son.
Current profile77
Replacement profile77
Current profile78=== Son John ===
Replacement profile78=== Son John ===
Current profile79
Replacement profile79
Current profile80The 1571 record directly proves that James elder had a son named John.<ref name="NRS1571" /> [[Glasgow-3193|John Glasgow]] is the surviving profile after the record-defined Corsinkell profile Glasgow-4061 was merged into it on 27 September 2026. James is directly identified as the father of the Corsinkell son named in the deed; the structured father link to this merged profile remains uncertain because its Kilwinning identity is not directly bridged.
Replacement profile80The 1571 record directly proves that James elder had a son named John.<ref name="NRS1571" /> [[Glasgow-3193|John Glasgow]] is the surviving profile after the record-defined Corsinkell profile Glasgow-4061 was merged into it on 27 September 2026. James is directly identified as the father of the Corsinkell son named in the deed; the structured father link to this merged profile remains uncertain because its Kilwinning identity is not directly bridged.
Current profile81
Replacement profile81
Current profile82The merger also brings the Kilwinning/Burrowland/Dalgarven records under this one profile as a probable identity match by name, generation and Ayrshire setting. No inspected deed explicitly carries the Corsinkell son to those holdings, so that part of the combined identity remains qualified. The former link to [[Glasgow-1561|John Glasgow]] should not be used.
Replacement profile82The merger also brings the Kilwinning/Burrowland/Dalgarven records under this one profile as a probable identity match by name, generation and Ayrshire setting. No inspected deed explicitly carries the Corsinkell son to those holdings, so that part of the combined identity remains qualified. The former link to [[Glasgow-1561|John Glasgow]] should not be used.
Current profile83
Replacement profile83
Current profile84=== Landholding context ===
Replacement profile84=== Landholding context ===
Current profile85
Replacement profile85
Current profile86Corsinkell formed part of lands held under branches of the Cunninghame family.
Replacement profile86Corsinkell formed part of lands held under branches of the Cunninghame family.
Current profile87
Replacement profile87
Current profile88A charter made at Kerelaw on 4 February 1527 and confirmed on 25 May 1536 granted David Cunningham of Bertaneholme the five-merk lands of Corsinkell and Middlepart with other Stevenston lands.<ref name="Corsinkell1536">''Registrum Magni Sigilli Regum Scotorum'', vol. 3, [https://archive.org/details/registrummagnisi03scot/page/133/mode/2up no. 596, printed pp. 133–134].</ref>
Replacement profile88A charter made at Kerelaw on 4 February 1527 and confirmed on 25 May 1536 granted David Cunningham of Bertaneholme the five-merk lands of Corsinkell and Middlepart with other Stevenston lands.<ref name="Corsinkell1536">''Registrum Magni Sigilli Regum Scotorum'', vol. 3, [https://archive.org/details/registrummagnisi03scot/page/133/mode/2up no. 596, printed pp. 133–134].</ref>
Current profile89
Replacement profile89
Current profile90A further charter dated 11 July 1537 and confirmed on 4 August 1537 included two-and-a-half merk lands of Corsinkell in a grant to David Cunningham of Robertland.<ref name="Corsinkell1537">''Registrum Magni Sigilli Regum Scotorum'', vol. 3, [https://archive.org/details/registrummagnisi03scot/page/377/mode/2up no. 1698, printed p. 377].</ref>
Replacement profile90A further charter dated 11 July 1537 and confirmed on 4 August 1537 included two-and-a-half merk lands of Corsinkell in a grant to David Cunningham of Robertland.<ref name="Corsinkell1537">''Registrum Magni Sigilli Regum Scotorum'', vol. 3, [https://archive.org/details/registrummagnisi03scot/page/377/mode/2up no. 1698, printed p. 377].</ref>
Current profile91
Replacement profile91
Current profile92These charters establish the superior-title history of Corsinkell but do not name James Glasgow, identify an earlier Glasgow tenant or prove a kinship relationship with the Cunninghames.
Replacement profile92These charters establish the superior-title history of Corsinkell but do not name James Glasgow, identify an earlier Glasgow tenant or prove a kinship relationship with the Cunninghames.
Current profile93
Replacement profile93
Current profile94Later marriages between people named Glasgow and Cunningham do not establish James's ancestry or his relationship to those later families.
Replacement profile94Later marriages between people named Glasgow and Cunningham do not establish James's ancestry or his relationship to those later families.
Current profile95
Replacement profile95
Current profile96=== Mathie and Glencairn network ===
Replacement profile96=== Mathie and Glencairn network ===
Current profile97
Replacement profile97
Current profile98The 1559–60 teind list also places John Mathie at Ardeer Nether, Margaret Mathie at Templemuir of Corscraig and William Mathie at Middlepart, alongside [[Glasgow-3908|Matthew Glasgow]], [[Glasgow-3911|Michael Glasgow]] and the Corsinkell Glasgows.<ref name="TeindList" /> This repeated association has a city counterpart: David Mathy and [[Glasgow-1096|Robert Glasgow]] were fellow Glasgow burgesses witnessing the same sasines in 1554.<ref name="Mathie1554">Robert Renwick, ed., Abstracts of Protocols of the Town Clerks of Glasgow, vol. 1, protocols 183–184, [https://archive.org/details/abstractsprotoc07robegoog/page/n90/mode/2up 10 May 1554, printed p. 63].</ref>
Replacement profile98The 1559–60 teind list also places John Mathie at Ardeer Nether, Margaret Mathie at Templemuir of Corscraig and William Mathie at Middlepart, alongside [[Glasgow-3908|Matthew Glasgow]], [[Glasgow-3911|Michael Glasgow]] and the Corsinkell Glasgows.<ref name="TeindList" /> This repeated association has a city counterpart: David Mathy and [[Glasgow-1096|Robert Glasgow]] were fellow Glasgow burgesses witnessing the same sasines in 1554.<ref name="Mathie1554">Robert Renwick, ed., Abstracts of Protocols of the Town Clerks of Glasgow, vol. 1, protocols 183–184, [https://archive.org/details/abstractsprotoc07robegoog/page/n90/mode/2up 10 May 1554, printed p. 63].</ref>
Current profile99
Replacement profile99
Current profile100David’s son John is a plausible match for the writer admitted with the Earl of Glencairn’s burgess group in 1583. Tutory retours entered in 1607 identify the deceased John Mathie of Ibert’s full brother Matthew as a Glasgow burgess and name John’s lawful children James, David, Agnes and Margaret.<ref name="Ibert1607">Inquisitionum ad Capellam Domini Regis Retornatarum ... Abbreviatio, vol. 2, tutory retours 100–101, 20 January 1607, [https://books.google.com/books?id=PiVDAAAAcAAJ digitised volume]; underlying register, National Records of Scotland, [https://catalogue.nrscotland.gov.uk/nrsonlinecatalogue/browsetreeview.aspx?reference=C22 C22/3].</ref> This provides a credible route between Robert’s Glasgow burgh family and the Glencairn estate community at Stevenston. It makes an association between the Glasgow households more plausible, although it does not identify James elder’s father.
Replacement profile100David’s son John is a plausible match for the writer admitted with the Earl of Glencairn’s burgess group in 1583. Tutory retours entered in 1607 identify the deceased John Mathie of Ibert’s full brother Matthew as a Glasgow burgess and name John’s lawful children James, David, Agnes and Margaret.<ref name="Ibert1607">Inquisitionum ad Capellam Domini Regis Retornatarum ... Abbreviatio, vol. 2, tutory retours 100–101, 20 January 1607, [https://books.google.com/books?id=PiVDAAAAcAAJ digitised volume]; underlying register, National Records of Scotland, [https://catalogue.nrscotland.gov.uk/nrsonlinecatalogue/browsetreeview.aspx?reference=C22 C22/3].</ref> This provides a credible route between Robert’s Glasgow burgh family and the Glencairn estate community at Stevenston. It makes an association between the Glasgow households more plausible, although it does not identify James elder’s father.
Current profile101
Replacement profile101
Current profile102=== The 1571 Glasgow burgess witness ===
Replacement profile102=== The 1571 Glasgow burgess witness ===
Current profile103
Replacement profile103
Current profile104The 9 February 1571 Corsinkell letters of reversion name Mr Adam Wallace, explicitly a '''burgess of Glasgow''', among the witnesses, alongside the Porterfields and an earl's servant.<ref name="NRS1571" /> This places a named Glasgow civic figure at the same transaction that identifies James elder and his sons. A later Glencairn record names a Mr Adam Wallace as one of Glasgow's bailies and William Wallace as his son; the matching name and city favour the same civic officer but do not establish his relationship to the Corsinkell Glasgows.<ref>National Records of Scotland, Earls of Glencairn, [https://catalogue.nrscotland.gov.uk/nrsonlinecatalogue/details.aspx?reference=GD39%2F5%2F68 GD39/5/68], commission dated 26 April 1588 (catalogue description; original not inspected).</ref>
Replacement profile104The 9 February 1571 Corsinkell letters of reversion name Mr Adam Wallace, explicitly a '''burgess of Glasgow''', among the witnesses, alongside the Porterfields and an earl's servant.<ref name="NRS1571" /> This places a named Glasgow civic figure at the same transaction that identifies James elder and his sons. A later Glencairn record names a Mr Adam Wallace as one of Glasgow's bailies and William Wallace as his son; the matching name and city favour the same civic officer but do not establish his relationship to the Corsinkell Glasgows.<ref>National Records of Scotland, Earls of Glencairn, [https://catalogue.nrscotland.gov.uk/nrsonlinecatalogue/details.aspx?reference=GD39%2F5%2F68 GD39/5/68], commission dated 26 April 1588 (catalogue description; original not inspected).</ref>
Current profile105
Replacement profile105
Current profile106The 1571 witness is a direct city-to-estate legal contact, not evidence that James elder was a son of [[Glasgow-1098|William Glasgow]] or kin to Wallace. The reason Wallace witnessed this deed remains open.
Replacement profile106The 1571 witness is a direct city-to-estate legal contact, not evidence that James elder was a son of [[Glasgow-1098|William Glasgow]] or kin to Wallace. The reason Wallace witnessed this deed remains open.
Current profile107
Replacement profile107
Current profile108=== Margaret Smith of Brekpleuch ===
Replacement profile108=== Margaret Smith of Brekpleuch ===
Current profile109
Replacement profile109
Current profile110The Glasgow Commissary testament index contains an entry dated 21 February 1632 for Margaret Smith, spouse of James Glasgow in Brekpleuch, parish of Stevenston.<ref name="MargaretSmith">Francis J. Grant, ed., [https://archive.org/details/scottishrecordso07scotuoft/page/460/mode/2up ''The Commissariot Record of Glasgow: Register of Testaments, 1547–1800''] (Scottish Record Society, 1901), printed p. 460.</ref>
Replacement profile110The Glasgow Commissary testament index contains an entry dated 21 February 1632 for Margaret Smith, spouse of James Glasgow in Brekpleuch, parish of Stevenston.<ref name="MargaretSmith">Francis J. Grant, ed., [https://archive.org/details/scottishrecordso07scotuoft/page/460/mode/2up ''The Commissariot Record of Glasgow: Register of Testaments, 1547–1800''] (Scottish Record Society, 1901), printed p. 460.</ref>
Current profile111
Replacement profile111
Current profile112That couple belongs to a later generation. The entry does not identify the James Glasgow of Brekpleuch as James elder, his son or another specific descendant.
Replacement profile112That couple belongs to a later generation. The entry does not identify the James Glasgow of Brekpleuch as James elder, his son or another specific descendant.
Current profile113
Replacement profile113
Current profile114=== Disputed origins ===
Replacement profile114=== Disputed origins ===
Current profile115
Replacement profile115
Current profile116Online family trees have assigned James a birth in Midlothian, parents named John Glasgow and Nancy Glendinning, a wife named Margaret Edstoun, and a death in 1580.
Replacement profile116Online family trees have assigned James a birth in Midlothian, parents named John Glasgow and Nancy Glendinning, a wife named Margaret Edstoun, and a death in 1580.
Current profile117
Replacement profile117
Current profile118No contemporary evidence cited on this profile supports those claims.
Replacement profile118No contemporary evidence cited on this profile supports those claims.
Current profile119
Replacement profile119
Current profile120The 1580 testament of Margaret Glasgow, widow of John Edstoun of Croftmalloch, concerns a Midlothian family and does not establish a marriage to James of Corsinkell.
Replacement profile120The 1580 testament of Margaret Glasgow, widow of John Edstoun of Croftmalloch, concerns a Midlothian family and does not establish a marriage to James of Corsinkell.
Current profile121
Replacement profile121
Current profile122The Ayrshire and Midlothian families should be researched independently unless a record explicitly connects them.
Replacement profile122The Ayrshire and Midlothian families should be researched independently unless a record explicitly connects them.
Current profile123
Replacement profile123
Current profile124=== Negative searches ===
Replacement profile124=== Negative searches ===
Current profile125
Replacement profile125
Current profile126No published Great Seal entry examined for Corsinkell identifies James's father, siblings or a preceding Glasgow tenant.
Replacement profile126No published Great Seal entry examined for Corsinkell identifies James's father, siblings or a preceding Glasgow tenant.
Current profile127
Replacement profile127
Current profile128No relevant entry was found in the searched published Privy Seal registers under James Glasgow, surname variants or Corsinkell variants.
Replacement profile128No relevant entry was found in the searched published Privy Seal registers under James Glasgow, surname variants or Corsinkell variants.
Current profile129
Replacement profile129
Current profile130The printed Glasgow Commissary testament index contains no testament indexed under James Glasgow of Corsinkell.
Replacement profile130The printed Glasgow Commissary testament index contains no testament indexed under James Glasgow of Corsinkell.
Current profile131
Replacement profile131
Current profile132These negative results narrow the available evidence but do not prove that no relevant record survives elsewhere or under a different spelling.
Replacement profile132These negative results narrow the available evidence but do not prove that no relevant record survives elsewhere or under a different spelling.
Current profile133
Replacement profile133
Current profile134=== Further research ===
Replacement profile134=== Further research ===
Current profile135
Replacement profile135
Current profile136Useful remaining records include:
Replacement profile136Useful remaining records include:
Current profile137
Replacement profile137
Current profile138* the original GD39/5/59 deed, particularly its punctuation and witness clauses;
Replacement profile138* the original GD39/5/59 deed, particularly its punctuation and witness clauses;
Current profile139* the underlying Court of Session teind action cited for 1559–1560;
Replacement profile139* the underlying Court of Session teind action cited for 1559–1560;
Current profile140* Ayrshire sasines and rentals for Corsinkell;
Replacement profile140* Ayrshire sasines and rentals for Corsinkell;
Current profile141* Glencairn and Cunningham estate papers;
Replacement profile141* Glencairn and Cunningham estate papers;
Current profile142* Stevenston parish and commissary records;
Replacement profile142* Stevenston parish and commissary records;
Current profile143* a deed connecting the 1571 Corsinkell son John to the Kilwinning/Burrowland/Dalgarven holdings now represented on his merged profile;
Replacement profile143* a deed connecting the 1571 Corsinkell son John to the Kilwinning/Burrowland/Dalgarven holdings now represented on his merged profile;
Current profile144* evidence for or against Agnes Glasgow as a daughter;
Replacement profile144* evidence for or against Agnes Glasgow as a daughter;
Current profile145* records identifying Katherine and Christian Campbell; and
Replacement profile145* records identifying Katherine and Christian Campbell; and
Current profile146* any record connecting the Corsinkell family with [[Glasgow-1098|William Glasgow]] or [[Brade-232|Isobel Brade]].
Replacement profile146* any record connecting the Corsinkell family with [[Glasgow-1098|William Glasgow]] or [[Brade-232|Isobel Brade]].
Current profile147
Replacement profile147
Current profile148=== Possible collateral households ===
Replacement profile148=== Possible collateral households ===
Current profile149The 1559-60 Stevenston teind list places [[Glasgow-3908|Matthew Glasgow]] at Ardeer Nether and [[Glasgow-3911|Michael Glasgow]] at Brakpleuch in the same estate landscape as James elder and James younger at Corsankell.<ref>Margaret H. B. Sanderson, ''The People of Sixteenth Century Ayrshire'', appendix “The Cunninghame Teind Lists of 1559-60,” [https://aanhs.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/people-of-ayrshire.pdf#page=36 p. 331].</ref>
Replacement profile149The 1559-60 Stevenston teind list places [[Glasgow-3908|Matthew Glasgow]] at Ardeer Nether and [[Glasgow-3911|Michael Glasgow]] at Brakpleuch in the same estate landscape as James elder and James younger at Corsankell.<ref>Margaret H. B. Sanderson, ''The People of Sixteenth Century Ayrshire'', appendix “The Cunninghame Teind Lists of 1559-60,” [https://aanhs.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/people-of-ayrshire.pdf#page=36 p. 331].</ref>
Current profile150
Replacement profile150
Current profile151Matthew is linked as James's uncertain working son, although the same evidence also permits a nephew or younger collateral. The 1571 Corsankell writ proves sons James and John but does not purport to enumerate every child.<ref>National Records of Scotland, Charter Chest of the Earls of Glencairn, [https://catalogue.nrscotland.gov.uk/nrsonlinecatalogue/details.aspx?reference=GD39%2F5%2F59 GD39/5/59], 9 February 1571.</ref> Michael was already an adult legal witness in the Glencairn network in 1549, so he is better assessed as James's probable brother or cousin rather than a son. Neither exact relationship is stated in a record.
Replacement profile151Matthew is linked as James's uncertain working son, although the same evidence also permits a nephew or younger collateral. The 1571 Corsankell writ proves sons James and John but does not purport to enumerate every child.<ref>National Records of Scotland, Charter Chest of the Earls of Glencairn, [https://catalogue.nrscotland.gov.uk/nrsonlinecatalogue/details.aspx?reference=GD39%2F5%2F59 GD39/5/59], 9 February 1571.</ref> Michael was already an adult legal witness in the Glencairn network in 1549, so he is better assessed as James's probable brother or cousin rather than a son. Neither exact relationship is stated in a record.
Current profile152
Replacement profile152
Current profile153== Sources ==
Replacement profile153== Sources ==
Current profile154
Replacement profile154
Current profile155<references />
Replacement profile155<references />
Full replacement WikiTree biography

Copy this complete text into the WikiTree biography editor. Removed lines appear red on the left; added lines appear green on the right. Apply any structured vital or relationship correction described in the update separately in WikiTree's data fields.

Open WikiTree profile

Saved people and pages

Select 2 people to compare their evidence.