Individual research record
Benjamin Douglas Thomas Glasco
1860-05-07 – 1944-09-29
Glasco-38 · 1 mapped association
At a glance
Identity & family
Tree links organise the family; documentary status still varies.
- Birth
- 1860-05-07 · Morgan County, Indiana, United States
- Death
- 1944-09-29 · Athens, Gentry, Missouri, United States
- Parents
- Not recorded
- Spouses
- Virginia Lenora (Steele) Glasco
- Children
- Lola Glasco
- Gender
- Male
- WikiTree
- Glasco-38
- Research clusters
- Worldwide One-Tree profile leads
- Mapped descendants
- 1
Comparison context
These child positions and checks are the subject details used to rank possible parents below.
Naming sequence used by the parentage model
Known-position checks: 0 support · 0 conflict. Ordinals retain unnamed children and recognise reused names.
Relationship comparison
Potential parents or duplicates
Compare scored leads with the subject details above—not proof.
Possible fathers5 leads
Possible Father
Benjamin Franklin GlasgowGlasgow-2637
- plausible 33-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- known spouse Matilda (Myerly) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (24) at the subject's birth (+7)
- candidate's birth is 59 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1886), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10); candidate's household recorded Prudence J (Glasgow) Wright in Union Township, Huntingdon, Pennsylvania, United States within 1 years of the subject (−12; no contemporaneous child is indexed in the subject's locality)
Show complete scoring
- plausible 33-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 59 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1886), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
- subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1859–1866) (+6; other parent Matilda (Myerly) Glasgow)
- known spouse Matilda (Myerly) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (24) at the subject's birth (+7)
- candidate and subject share the given name Benjamin (+8; weak direct parent-child name recurrence, 13 public profiles)
Deductions and cautions: same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10); candidate's household recorded Prudence J (Glasgow) Wright in Union Township, Huntingdon, Pennsylvania, United States within 1 years of the subject (−12; no contemporaneous child is indexed in the subject's locality)
Possible Father
Benjamin M. GlasgowGlasgow-66
- plausible 33-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 59 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1886), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)
Show complete scoring
- plausible 33-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 59 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1886), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
- candidate and subject share the given name Benjamin (+8; weak direct parent-child name recurrence, 13 public profiles)
Deductions and cautions: same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)
Show 3 lower-scoring possible fathers
Possible Father
Benjamin Johnson GlascoGlasco-112
- possible 17-year parent-child age gap (+10)
- candidate's birth is 43 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1886), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)
Show complete scoring
- possible 17-year parent-child age gap (+10)
- candidate's birth is 43 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1886), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
- candidate and subject share the given name Benjamin (+8; weak direct parent-child name recurrence, 13 public profiles)
Deductions and cautions: same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)
Possible Father
Benjamin GlasgowGlasgow-3150
- possible 19-year parent-child age gap (+10)
- candidate's birth is 45 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1886), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- candidate and subject share the given name Benjamin (+8; weak direct parent-child name recurrence, 13 public profiles)
same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)
Show complete scoring
- possible 19-year parent-child age gap (+10)
- candidate's birth is 45 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1886), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- candidate and subject share the given name Benjamin (+8; weak direct parent-child name recurrence, 13 public profiles)
Deductions and cautions: same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)
Possible Father
Benjamin GlasgowGlasgow-2566
- plausible 20-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 46 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1886), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- known spouse Adelaide Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (23) at the subject's birth (+3)
candidate is recorded only outside the subject's birth country (−25)
Show complete scoring
- plausible 20-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 46 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1886), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- known spouse Adelaide Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (23) at the subject's birth (+3)
- candidate and subject share the given name Benjamin (+8; weak direct parent-child name recurrence, 13 public profiles)
Deductions and cautions: candidate is recorded only outside the subject's birth country (−25)
Possible mothers5 leads
Possible Mother
Mary (Lyle) GlascoLyle-581
- plausible 29-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 55 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1886), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction); candidate's household recorded George Glasco in District Of Columbia within 3 years of the subject (−12; no contemporaneous child is indexed in the subject's locality); candidate already has another child named Benjamin Glasco (Glasco-16) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict)
Show complete scoring
- plausible 29-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 55 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1886), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
- subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1857–1872) (+6; other parent Thomas Glasco)
- uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Benjamin +12 (13 public profiles; subject branch: Benjamin Douglas Thomas Glasco; candidate branch: Benjamin Glasco) (+12 total)
Deductions and cautions: locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction); candidate's household recorded George Glasco in District Of Columbia within 3 years of the subject (−12; no contemporaneous child is indexed in the subject's locality); candidate already has another child named Benjamin Glasco (Glasco-16) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict)
Possible Mother
Mary Jane (Hopper) GlasgowHopper-1979
- the nominal 7-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (15–17 years) (+4)
- candidate's birth is 33 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1886), a marginal two-generation interval (+1)
- uncommon spouse surnames recur across the subject and candidate branches: Steele +8 (+8 total)
parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction); candidate is recorded only outside the subject's birth country (−25)
Show complete scoring
- the nominal 7-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (15–17 years) (+4)
- candidate's birth is 33 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1886), a marginal two-generation interval (+1)
- uncommon spouse surnames recur across the subject and candidate branches: Steele +8 (+8 total)
Deductions and cautions: parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction); candidate is recorded only outside the subject's birth country (−25)
Show 3 lower-scoring possible mothers
Possible Mother
Susannah (High) GlasgowHigh-479
- candidate's birth is 86 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1886), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
- uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Benjamin +12 (13 public profiles; subject branch: Benjamin Douglas Thomas Glasco; candidate branch: Benjamin M. Glasgow) (+12 total)
chronologically conflicting 60-year parent-child age gap (−8); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10); subject lies more than 20 years from the candidate's known child-bearing period (−6; children may be missing); candidate already has another child named Benjamin M. Glasgow (Glasgow-66) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict)
Show complete scoring
- candidate's birth is 86 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1886), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
- uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Benjamin +12 (13 public profiles; subject branch: Benjamin Douglas Thomas Glasco; candidate branch: Benjamin M. Glasgow) (+12 total)
Deductions and cautions: chronologically conflicting 60-year parent-child age gap (−8); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10); subject lies more than 20 years from the candidate's known child-bearing period (−6; children may be missing); candidate already has another child named Benjamin M. Glasgow (Glasgow-66) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict)
Possible Mother
Matilda Jane (Campbell) GlasgowCampbell-30989
- plausible 40-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 66 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1886), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)
Show complete scoring
- plausible 40-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 66 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1886), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
- subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1857–1865) (+6; other parent Robert Barclay Glasgow)
Deductions and cautions: locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)
Possible Mother
Rachael (Gregg) RaheGregg-5004
- plausible 22-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 48 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1886), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- a known child was born within 3 years of the subject (+3)
No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required
Show complete scoring
- plausible 22-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 48 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1886), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- weak broad-area overlap: missouri (+1; not a locality match)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
- a known child was born within 3 years of the subject (+3)
Deductions and cautions: No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required
How parent leads are calculated
Automated leads use birth surnames—not married surnames—as parental eligibility, role-specific biological age limits, bounded and approximate-date uncertainty, household chronology, specific time-aware localities, mapped distance, tenancy succession, migration destinations and sex-aware Scottish naming positions across generations. People already attached as the subject's parents stay in the identity summary and are excluded from this alternative-candidate list, regardless of relationship confidence. The main calibration uses clues available on disconnected profiles; existing parent and sibling links are retained as comparison context rather than treated as transferable evidence. Common ordered names and grandparent-to-child echoes receive a small non-zero weight, so a John or James match can support several independent criteria without producing a lead alone. Rare names, repeated bearers and bundles across otherwise distinct branches receive substantially more weight according to catalogue frequency. An exact migration place is weighted by its rarity and repetition across both branches; a shared destination country is worth only one point. Extra weight is added only when at least three independent clue types converge: naming, locality, specific migration, household chronology or collateral networks. Sparse profiles retain a clearly labelled chronology-only fallback instead of disappearing. Countries, states, counties and research clusters do not count as a shared locality, and fallback, broad representative or kin-inferred coordinates are excluded from distance scoring. Shared descendant profiles are removed before branch-name comparison. A candidate already recorded as a parent-in-law is excluded. A confident or independently supported parent is treated as settled; uncertain and unassessed attachments remain open to alternative comparison. A different linked parent, an uncle/aunt or grandparent path, and a matching existing child profile prevent an alternative from being classified as a strong direct-parent lead until the underlying tree conflict or duplicate is resolved. Familiar forms such as Bessie are normalised. Surname remains an eligibility filter worth zero points.
Naming customs, shared farms and occupations are circumstantial. Children, spouses and collateral relatives may be missing, and tree-derived family networks are not independent evidence. Scores rank research leads; they do not prove parentage.
Same-name candidate
Benjamin GlassgoGlassgo-4
- same first and last name (+18)
- birth years within 2 (+25)
No indexed conflict
Full comparison detail
- same first and last name (+18)
- birth years within 2 (+25)
Conflicts: No indexed conflict
Same-name candidate
Benjamin Franklin GlasgowGlasgow-204
- same first and last name (+18)
- birth years within 15 (+2)
- death years within 1 (+10)
No indexed conflict
Full comparison detail
- same first and last name (+18)
- birth years within 15 (+2)
- death years within 1 (+10)
- overlapping locality (+8)
Conflicts: No indexed conflict
How duplicate leads are calculated
Dates are eligibility gates, not merely deductions: chronologically impossible people are excluded. Dates, places, spouses, parent certainty and children's profiles and names are then compared. A high score is a prompt to inspect records, not a merge recommendation.
Open only what you need
Research & records
Life and record timelineChronological mapped occurrences and their underlying sources.1 record
Profile-stated birthplace: Morgan County, Indiana, USA
One-Tree export profile fields are search leads, not sources; relationships are shown only where the export supplies parent links.
Source and mapping detail
WikiTree profile export for Glasco-38
No sufficiently specific citation match found.
Precision: Country-centre fallback for profile locality
Evidence assessmentWhat is supported, uncertain or disputed in the current case model.3 claims
Documented or strongly supported
No claims in this category have been formally assessed.
Working hypotheses and conflicts
No claims in this category have been formally assessed.
Research questionsOpen problems, missing bridges and the next records to inspect.0 open
No formal open question is recorded for this person.
Sources and provenanceStructured citations and source-quality classifications.1 source
Source or provenance: quality describes the record layer, not every conclusion drawn from it.
- tree_only WikiTree profile export for Glasco-38
Technical profile and raw captureDataset metadata, machine dossier and captured WikiTree biography.Advanced
WikiTree profile information
Glasco-38
Benjamin Douglas Thomas Glasco
Updated 2022-12-31
Dataset: ONT_Glasco_2026-08-18T16_05.json · generated 2026-08-20