Glasgow Surname Project

Individual research record

Richard Glasco

before 1837 – ?

Glasco-90 · 1 mapped association

Birthplace unknownDeath place unknown

At a glance

Identity & family

Tree links organise the family; documentary status still varies.

1Mapped records
2Close relations
1Evidence items
12Candidate leads
Birth
before 1837 · Place not recorded
Death
Not recorded · Place not recorded
Parents
Not recorded
Spouses
Mary Ann (Alsup) Glasco
Children
Sarah Ann Harriet (Glasco) Proctor
Gender
Male
WikiTree
Glasco-90
Research clusters
Worldwide One-Tree profile leads
Mapped descendants
1

Comparison context

These child positions and checks are the subject details used to rank possible parents below.

Naming sequence used by the parentage model

Paternal grandfather positionNot identifiable from dated child profiles
Maternal grandfather positionNot identifiable from dated child profiles
Maternal grandmother positionSarah Ann Harriet (Glasco) Proctor (1855)
Paternal grandmother positionNot identifiable from dated child profiles

Known-position checks: 0 support · 0 conflict. Ordinals retain unnamed children and recognise reused names.

Relationship comparison

Potential parents or duplicates

Compare scored leads with the subject details above—not proof.

Higher-signal leadReview carefullyWeak lead

Possible fathers5 leads

Automated fit31/100
Weak Lead
Dates1815–1844Generationnominally 22 years; true gap uncertain age gapRecorded placesKillycurragh, Derryloran, County Tyrone, Ireland, United Kingdom · Ireland — exact locality unproved · Killycurragh townland — Oritor/DerryloranIndependent clue breadth · 5Age · Household · Rare Branch-Name Recurrence · Spouse · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • candidate's birth is 40 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1855), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • known spouse Elizabeth (Ferguson) Dougal had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (25) at the subject's birth (+3)
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of nominally 22 years; true gap uncertain (+10; true age remains uncertain)

locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Show complete scoring
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of nominally 22 years; true gap uncertain (+10; true age remains uncertain)
  • candidate's birth is 40 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1855), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • another recorded child shares the subject's birth year (+2; possible twins or date uncertainty)
  • known spouse Elizabeth (Ferguson) Dougal had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (25) at the subject's birth (+3)
  • uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Richard +12 (14 public profiles; subject branch: Richard Glasco; candidate branch: Richard Glasgow) (+12 total)

Deductions and cautions: locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Automated fit29/100
Weak Lead
Dates1803–1864Generationnominally 34 years; true gap uncertain age gapRecorded placesKillycurragh, County Tyrone, Ireland, United Kingdom · Killycurragh townland — Oritor/DerryloranIndependent clue breadth · 4Age · Household · Rare Branch-Name Recurrence · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • candidate's birth is 52 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1855), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of nominally 34 years; true gap uncertain (+10; true age remains uncertain)
  • subject's birth fits within the candidate's overall child-bearing span (1824–1842) (+3; children are not tied to one spouse)

locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Show complete scoring
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of nominally 34 years; true gap uncertain (+10; true age remains uncertain)
  • candidate's birth is 52 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1855), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • subject's birth fits within the candidate's overall child-bearing span (1824–1842) (+3; children are not tied to one spouse)
  • uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Richard +12 (14 public profiles; subject branch: Richard Glasco; candidate branch: Richard Glasgow) (+12 total)

Deductions and cautions: locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Show 3 lower-scoring possible fathers
Automated fit23/100
Weak Lead
Dates1821–1897Generationat most 16 years age gapRecorded placesGrainger, Tennessee, United States · Lyon, Kentucky, United StatesIndependent clue breadth · 3Age · Rare Branch-Name Recurrence · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • candidate's birth is 34 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1855), a marginal two-generation interval (+1)
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 16 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)

locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Show complete scoring
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 16 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
  • candidate's birth is 34 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1855), a marginal two-generation interval (+1)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Richard +12 (14 public profiles; subject branch: Richard Glasco; candidate branch: Richard Glasgow) (+12 total)

Deductions and cautions: locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Automated fit20/100
Weak Lead
Dates1821–?Generationat most 16 years age gapRecorded placesMissouri, United StatesIndependent clue breadth · 4Age · Broad Geography · Same-Sex Generational Naming · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • candidate's birth is 34 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1855), a marginal two-generation interval (+1)
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 16 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
  • weak broad-area overlap: missouri (+1; not a locality match)

No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required

Show complete scoring
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 16 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
  • candidate's birth is 34 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1855), a marginal two-generation interval (+1)
  • weak broad-area overlap: missouri (+1; not a locality match)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • candidate and subject share the given name Richard (+8; weak direct parent-child name recurrence, 14 public profiles)

Deductions and cautions: No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required

Automated fit14/100
Weak Lead
Dates1778–1859Generationat most 59 years age gapRecorded placesGlasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland · Logan Township, Blair, Pennsylvania, United States · GlasgowIndependent clue breadth · 3Age · Same-Sex Generational Naming · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • candidate's birth is 77 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1855), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • less typical 59-year parent-child age gap (+2)
  • candidate and subject share the given name Richard (+8; weak direct parent-child name recurrence, 14 public profiles)

locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Show complete scoring
  • less typical 59-year parent-child age gap (+2)
  • candidate's birth is 77 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1855), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • candidate and subject share the given name Richard (+8; weak direct parent-child name recurrence, 14 public profiles)

Deductions and cautions: locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Possible mothers5 leads

Automated fit29/100
Weak Lead
Dates1812–1901Generationat most 25 years age gapRecorded placesCounty Tyrone, Ireland · Killycurragh, Derryloran, Cookstown, Tyrone, Ireland · County Tyrone — exact locality unprovedIndependent clue breadth · 4Age · Household · Rare Branch-Name Recurrence · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • candidate's birth is 43 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1855), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 25 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
  • subject's birth fits within the candidate's overall child-bearing span (1835–1849) (+3; children are not tied to one spouse)

locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Show complete scoring
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 25 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
  • candidate's birth is 43 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1855), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • subject's birth fits within the candidate's overall child-bearing span (1835–1849) (+3; children are not tied to one spouse)
  • uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Richard +12 (14 public profiles; subject branch: Richard Glasco; candidate branch: Richard Glasgow) (+12 total)

Deductions and cautions: locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Automated fit18/100
Chronology-Only Fallback
Dates1810–1868Generationat most 27 years age gapRecorded placesMaryland, United States · Adair, Missouri, United StatesIndependent clue breadth · 4Age · Broad Geography · Household · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • candidate's birth is 45 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1855), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • a known child was born within 2 years of the subject (+3)
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 27 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)

No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required

Show complete scoring
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 27 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
  • candidate's birth is 45 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1855), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • weak broad-area overlap: missouri (+1; not a locality match)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • a known child was born within 2 years of the subject (+3)

Deductions and cautions: No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required

Show 3 lower-scoring possible mothers
Automated fit17/100
Chronology-Only Fallback
Dates1814–1895Generationat most 23 years age gapRecorded placesCounty Antrim, Ireland · Blanchard, Page, Iowa, United States · County Antrim — exact locality unprovedIndependent clue breadth · 3Age · Spouse-Specific Child Window · Two-GenerationSame-spouse child windowRobert Alexander GlasgowCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • candidate's birth is 41 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1855), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 23 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
  • subject birth boundary overlaps children attributed to the same parental couple (1832–1854) (+3; other parent Robert Alexander Glasgow)

locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Show complete scoring
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 23 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
  • candidate's birth is 41 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1855), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • subject birth boundary overlaps children attributed to the same parental couple (1832–1854) (+3; other parent Robert Alexander Glasgow)

Deductions and cautions: locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Automated fit17/100
Chronology-Only Fallback
Dates1813–?Generationat most 24 years age gapRecorded placesTennessee, United StatesIndependent clue breadth · 3Age · Household · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • candidate's birth is 42 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1855), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • a known child was born within 2 years of the subject (+3)
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 24 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)

locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Show complete scoring
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 24 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
  • candidate's birth is 42 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1855), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • a known child was born within 2 years of the subject (+3)

Deductions and cautions: locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Automated fit17/100
Chronology-Only Fallback
Dates1812–1870Generationat most 25 years age gapRecorded placesAdams, Ohio, United States · Shelby, Ohio, United StatesIndependent clue breadth · 3Age · Spouse-Specific Child Window · Two-GenerationSame-spouse child windowArthur GlasgowCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • candidate's birth is 43 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1855), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 25 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)

locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Show complete scoring
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 25 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
  • candidate's birth is 43 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1855), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • subject birth boundary overlaps children attributed to the same parental couple (1830–1849) (+3; other parent Arthur Glasgow)

Deductions and cautions: locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

How parent leads are calculated

Automated leads use birth surnames—not married surnames—as parental eligibility, role-specific biological age limits, bounded and approximate-date uncertainty, household chronology, specific time-aware localities, mapped distance, tenancy succession, migration destinations and sex-aware Scottish naming positions across generations. People already attached as the subject's parents stay in the identity summary and are excluded from this alternative-candidate list, regardless of relationship confidence. The main calibration uses clues available on disconnected profiles; existing parent and sibling links are retained as comparison context rather than treated as transferable evidence. Common ordered names and grandparent-to-child echoes receive a small non-zero weight, so a John or James match can support several independent criteria without producing a lead alone. Rare names, repeated bearers and bundles across otherwise distinct branches receive substantially more weight according to catalogue frequency. An exact migration place is weighted by its rarity and repetition across both branches; a shared destination country is worth only one point. Extra weight is added only when at least three independent clue types converge: naming, locality, specific migration, household chronology or collateral networks. Sparse profiles retain a clearly labelled chronology-only fallback instead of disappearing. Countries, states, counties and research clusters do not count as a shared locality, and fallback, broad representative or kin-inferred coordinates are excluded from distance scoring. Shared descendant profiles are removed before branch-name comparison. A candidate already recorded as a parent-in-law is excluded. A confident or independently supported parent is treated as settled; uncertain and unassessed attachments remain open to alternative comparison. A different linked parent, an uncle/aunt or grandparent path, and a matching existing child profile prevent an alternative from being classified as a strong direct-parent lead until the underlying tree conflict or duplicate is resolved. Familiar forms such as Bessie are normalised. Surname remains an eligibility filter worth zero points.

Naming customs, shared farms and occupations are circumstantial. Children, spouses and collateral relatives may be missing, and tree-derived family networks are not independent evidence. Scores rank research leads; they do not prove parentage.

Same-name candidate

Richard GlasgowGlasgow-46

Automated fit28/100
Similar Person
Dates1821–?PlacesMissouri, United StatesParent comparisonNo shared parent is indexed
Why it may fit
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 16 (+2)
  • overlapping locality (+8)

No indexed conflict

Full comparison detail
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 16 (+2)
  • overlapping locality (+8)

Conflicts: No indexed conflict

Same-name candidate

Richard GlasgowGlasgow-1990

Automated fit26/100
Similar Person
Dates1862–?PlacesMissouri, United StatesParent comparisonNo shared parent is indexed
Why it may fit
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • overlapping locality (+8)

record-derived birth estimates differ by 25; retained without deduction

Full comparison detail
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • overlapping locality (+8)

Conflicts: record-derived birth estimates differ by 25; retained without deduction

How duplicate leads are calculated

Dates are eligibility gates, not merely deductions: chronologically impossible people are excluded. Dates, places, spouses, parent certainty and children's profiles and names are then compared. A high score is a prompt to inspect records, not a merge recommendation.

Open only what you need

Research & records

Life and record timelineChronological mapped occurrences and their underlying sources.1 record
b. 1837

Profile-stated marriage place: Osage, Missouri, United States

Osage, Missouri, United States

One-Tree export profile fields are search leads, not sources; relationships are shown only where the export supplies parent links.

One-Tree profile leadunknown
Source and mapping detail

WikiTree profile export for Glasco-90

No sufficiently specific citation match found.

Precision: Country-centre fallback for profile locality

Evidence assessmentWhat is supported, uncertain or disputed in the current case model.3 claims
1Tree Only

Documented or strongly supported

No claims in this category have been formally assessed.

Working hypotheses and conflicts

No claims in this category have been formally assessed.

Research questionsOpen problems, missing bridges and the next records to inspect.0 open

No formal open question is recorded for this person.

Sources and provenanceStructured citations and source-quality classifications.1 source

Source or provenance: quality describes the record layer, not every conclusion drawn from it.

  1. tree_only WikiTree profile export for Glasco-90
Technical profile and raw captureDataset metadata, machine dossier and captured WikiTree biography.Advanced

WikiTree profile information

Dataset: ONT_Glasco_2026-08-18T16_05.json · generated 2026-08-20

Machine-readable dossier