Individual research record
William Glasgow
c. 1781 – c. 1853-02-07
Glasgow-1552 · 1 mapped association
At a glance
Identity & family
Tree links organise the family; documentary status still varies.
- Birth
- c. 1781 · At sea, Atlantic Ocean
- Death
- c. 1853-02-07 · Pennsylvania, United States
- Parents
- John Glasgowunmarked
- Spouses
- Not recorded
- Children
- Margarette Jane (Glasgow) Wilson
- Gender
- Male
- WikiTree
- Glasgow-1552
- Research clusters
- Worldwide One-Tree profile leads
- Mapped descendants
- 1
Comparison context
These child positions and checks are the subject details used to rank possible parents below.
Naming sequence used by the parentage model
Known-position checks: 0 support · 0 conflict. Ordinals retain unnamed children and recognise reused names.
Estimate and relationship notes
- 1 parent reference point outside the current export.
Relationship comparison
Potential parents or duplicates
Compare scored leads with the subject details above—not proof.
Possible fathers5 leads
Possible Father
Hugh GlasgowGlasgow-540
- plausible 42-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 88 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1827), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- known spouse Sarah (Blair) Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (24) at the subject's birth (+3)
a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15)
Show complete scoring
- plausible 42-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 88 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1827), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- weak broad-area overlap: pennsylvania (+1; not a locality match)
- subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1780–1792) (+6; other parent Sarah (Blair) Glasgow)
- known spouse Sarah (Blair) Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (24) at the subject's birth (+3)
Deductions and cautions: a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15)
Possible Father
Thomas GlascoGlasco-144
- plausible 28-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- known spouse Ann (Duffy) Glasco had a plausible maternal age (25) at the subject's birth (+7)
- candidate's birth is 74 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1827), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)
Show complete scoring
- plausible 28-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 74 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1827), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- known spouse Ann (Duffy) Glasco had a plausible maternal age (25) at the subject's birth (+7)
Deductions and cautions: a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)
Show 3 lower-scoring possible fathers
Possible Father
James GlasgowGlasgow-3991
- plausible 33-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- known spouse Jane Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (31) at the subject's birth (+7)
- candidate's birth is 79 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1827), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)
Show complete scoring
- plausible 33-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 79 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1827), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- known spouse Jane Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (31) at the subject's birth (+7)
Deductions and cautions: a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)
Possible Father
John GlasgowGlasgow-3314
- plausible 41-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- known spouse Margaret (Mill) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (41) at the subject's birth (+7)
- candidate's birth is 87 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1827), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)
Show complete scoring
- plausible 41-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 87 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1827), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- known spouse Margaret (Mill) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (41) at the subject's birth (+7)
Deductions and cautions: a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)
Possible Father
John GlasgowGlasgow-1022
- plausible 30-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 76 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1827), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- subject's birth fits within the candidate's overall child-bearing span (1779–1825) (+3; children are not tied to one spouse)
a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)
Show complete scoring
- plausible 30-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 76 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1827), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- subject's birth fits within the candidate's overall child-bearing span (1779–1825) (+3; children are not tied to one spouse)
- the subject would fill the first son position among the candidate's dated children, and the candidate's linked father William Glasgow shares the subject's common given name (+2; Scottish grandparent-name pattern, William in 223 public profiles; WikiTree: uncertain parent; weak alone)
Deductions and cautions: a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)
Possible mothers5 leads
Possible Mother
Sarah (Blair) GlasgowBlair-3693
- plausible 24-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 70 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1827), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- weak broad-area overlap: pennsylvania (+1; not a locality match)
No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required
Show complete scoring
- plausible 24-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 70 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1827), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- weak broad-area overlap: pennsylvania (+1; not a locality match)
- subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1780–1792) (+6; other parent Hugh Glasgow)
Deductions and cautions: No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required
Possible Mother
Elizabeth Mary GlasgowGlasgow-3291
- plausible 19-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 65 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1827), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- same broad administrative area only (+1; not a locality match)
No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required
Show complete scoring
- plausible 19-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 65 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1827), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- same broad administrative area only (+1; not a locality match)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
Deductions and cautions: No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required
Show 3 lower-scoring possible mothers
Possible Mother
Mary (Stephenson) GlasgowStephenson-7559
- plausible 32-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 78 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1827), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- a known child was born within 4 years of the subject (+1)
locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)
Show complete scoring
- plausible 32-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 78 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1827), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
- a known child was born within 4 years of the subject (+1)
Deductions and cautions: locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)
Possible Mother
Ann (Houston) GlasgowHouston-4780
- plausible 18-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 64 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1827), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)
Show complete scoring
- plausible 18-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 64 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1827), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
Deductions and cautions: locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)
Possible Mother
Janet GlasgowGlasgow-3071
- plausible 18-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 64 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1827), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)
Show complete scoring
- plausible 18-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 64 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1827), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
Deductions and cautions: locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)
How parent leads are calculated
Automated leads use birth surnames—not married surnames—as parental eligibility, role-specific biological age limits, bounded and approximate-date uncertainty, household chronology, specific time-aware localities, mapped distance, tenancy succession, migration destinations and sex-aware Scottish naming positions across generations. People already attached as the subject's parents stay in the identity summary and are excluded from this alternative-candidate list, regardless of relationship confidence. The main calibration uses clues available on disconnected profiles; existing parent and sibling links are retained as comparison context rather than treated as transferable evidence. Common ordered names and grandparent-to-child echoes receive a small non-zero weight, so a John or James match can support several independent criteria without producing a lead alone. Rare names, repeated bearers and bundles across otherwise distinct branches receive substantially more weight according to catalogue frequency. An exact migration place is weighted by its rarity and repetition across both branches; a shared destination country is worth only one point. Extra weight is added only when at least three independent clue types converge: naming, locality, specific migration, household chronology or collateral networks. Sparse profiles retain a clearly labelled chronology-only fallback instead of disappearing. Countries, states, counties and research clusters do not count as a shared locality, and fallback, broad representative or kin-inferred coordinates are excluded from distance scoring. Shared descendant profiles are removed before branch-name comparison. A candidate already recorded as a parent-in-law is excluded. A confident or independently supported parent is treated as settled; uncertain and unassessed attachments remain open to alternative comparison. A different linked parent, an uncle/aunt or grandparent path, and a matching existing child profile prevent an alternative from being classified as a strong direct-parent lead until the underlying tree conflict or duplicate is resolved. Familiar forms such as Bessie are normalised. Surname remains an eligibility filter worth zero points.
Naming customs, shared farms and occupations are circumstantial. Children, spouses and collateral relatives may be missing, and tree-derived family networks are not independent evidence. Scores rank research leads; they do not prove parentage.
Same-name candidate
William GlasgowGlasgow-563
- same first and last name (+18)
- birth years within 3 (+18)
- same death year (+15)
unassessed father attachments differ (−5)
Full comparison detail
- same first and last name (+18)
- birth years within 3 (+18)
- same death year (+15)
Conflicts: unassessed father attachments differ (−5)
Same-name candidate
William GlasgowGlasgow-2715
- same first and last name (+18)
- birth years within 2 (+25)
No indexed conflict
Full comparison detail
- same first and last name (+18)
- birth years within 2 (+25)
Conflicts: No indexed conflict
How duplicate leads are calculated
Dates are eligibility gates, not merely deductions: chronologically impossible people are excluded. Dates, places, spouses, parent certainty and children's profiles and names are then compared. A high score is a prompt to inspect records, not a merge recommendation.
Open only what you need
Research & records
Life and record timelineChronological mapped occurrences and their underlying sources.1 record
Profile-stated birthplace: At sea, Atlantic Ocean
One-Tree export profile fields are search leads, not sources; relationships are shown only where the export supplies parent links.
Source and mapping detail
WikiTree profile export for Glasgow-1552
No sufficiently specific citation match found.
Precision: Country-centre fallback for profile locality
Evidence assessmentWhat is supported, uncertain or disputed in the current case model.6 claims
Documented or strongly supported
No claims in this category have been formally assessed.
Working hypotheses and conflicts
No claims in this category have been formally assessed.
Research questionsOpen problems, missing bridges and the next records to inspect.0 open
No formal open question is recorded for this person.
Sources and provenanceStructured citations and source-quality classifications.2 sources
Source or provenance: quality describes the record layer, not every conclusion drawn from it.
Technical profile and raw captureDataset metadata, machine dossier and captured WikiTree biography.Advanced
WikiTree profile information
Glasgow-1552
William Glasgow
Updated 2026-05-18
Dataset: ONT_Glasco_2026-08-18T16_05.json · generated 2026-08-20
WikiTree biography, citations and relationship snapshot
Glasgow-1552 was captured 2026-08-07T09:54:35+00:00; WikiTree profile revision 2026-05-18.
Profile location claims
| Event | Date | Location | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| birth | — | At sea, Atlantic Ocean | WikiTree profile field |
| death | — | Pennsylvania | WikiTree profile field |
Immediate relationship snapshot
| Relationship | Person | WikiTree ID | Dates and places returned |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parents | John Glasgow | Glasgow-1549 | 1758-00-00 · Glasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland · 1825-02-00 · Sinking Valley, Blair, Pennsylvania, United States |
| Parents | Margaret | Hunter-18237 | 1759-00-00 · England · 1825-00-00 |
| Children | Margarette Jane Wilson | Glasgow-2798 | 1827-08-15 · Somerset County, Pennsylvania, USA · 1908-12-26 · Clarinda, Page, Iowa, United States |
| Siblings | Richard Glasgow | Glasgow-1551 | 1778-00-00 · Glasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland · 1859-03-02 · Logan Township, Blair, Pennsylvania, United States |
| Siblings | Matthew Glasgow | Glasgow-1553 | 1787-00-00 · Antis, Blair, Pennsylvania · 1849-05-00 · McVeytown, Huntingdon, Pennsylvania |
| Siblings | Taylor Wilson Glasgow | Glasgow-36 | 1798-11-01 · Antis, Blair, Pennsylvania, United States · 1889-05-27 |
Record-bearing passages
Biography William was born about 1781. He was the son of John Glasgow. He passed away about 1853. Sources
Profile source citations
- https://www.familysearch.org/tree/person/details/KL1L-9JG source link 1
Full captured biography text
Biography William was born about 1781. He was the son of John Glasgow. He passed away about 1853. Sources * https://www.familysearch.org/tree/person/details/KL1L-9JG
Raw WikiTree biography markup
== Biography == William was born about 1781. He was the son of [[Glasgow-1549|John Glasgow]]. He passed away about 1853. == Sources == <references /> * https://www.familysearch.org/tree/person/details/KL1L-9JG