Glasgow Surname Project

Individual research record

Jesse O Glasgow

1887-10 – ?

Glasgow-1955 · 1 mapped association

Kansas, United StatesDeath place unknown

At a glance

Identity & family

Tree links organise the family; documentary status still varies.

1Mapped records
3Close relations
2Evidence items
12Candidate leads
Birth
1887-10 · Kansas, United States
Death
Not recorded · Place not recorded
Parents
James Owen GlasgowunmarkedAmerica Ellen (Giles) Glasgowunmarked
Spouses
Not recorded
Children
Gordon Blaney Glasgow
Gender
Male
WikiTree
Glasgow-1955
Research clusters
Worldwide One-Tree profile leads
Mapped descendants
1

Comparison context

These child positions and checks are the subject details used to rank possible parents below.

Naming sequence used by the parentage model

Paternal grandfather positionGordon Blaney Glasgow (1910)
Maternal grandfather positionNot identifiable from dated child profiles
Maternal grandmother positionNot identifiable from dated child profiles
Paternal grandmother positionNot identifiable from dated child profiles

Known-position checks: 0 support · 0 conflict. Ordinals retain unnamed children and recognise reused names.

Relationship comparison

Potential parents or duplicates

Compare scored leads with the subject details above—not proof.

Higher-signal leadReview carefullyWeak lead

Possible fathers5 leads

Automated fit17/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1850–1902Generation37 years age gapRecorded placesAdams, Ohio, United States · Kansas City, Jackson, Missouri, United StatesIndependent clue breadth · 5Age · Broad Geography · Household · Spouse · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 37-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • known spouse Mary Etta (Dowell) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (33) at the subject's birth (+7)
  • candidate's birth is 60 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1910), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)

a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 37-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 60 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1910), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • weak broad-area overlap: kansas (+1; not a locality match)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • another recorded child shares the subject's birth year (+2; possible twins or date uncertainty)
  • known spouse Mary Etta (Dowell) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (33) at the subject's birth (+7)

Deductions and cautions: a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15)

Automated fit16/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1865–1958Generation22 years age gapRecorded placesTower Hill, Shelby, Illinois, United States · Garnett, Anderson, Kansas, United StatesIndependent clue breadth · 5Age · Broad Geography · Household · Spouse · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 22-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • known spouse Mary Belle (Jones) Glasco had a plausible maternal age (19) at the subject's birth (+7)
  • candidate's birth is 45 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1910), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)

a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 22-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 45 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1910), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • weak broad-area overlap: kansas (+1; not a locality match)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • a known child was born within 6 years of the subject (+1)
  • known spouse Mary Belle (Jones) Glasco had a plausible maternal age (19) at the subject's birth (+7)

Deductions and cautions: a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15)

Show 3 lower-scoring possible fathers
Automated fit16/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1853–1917Generation34 years age gapRecorded placesAdams, Ohio, United States · Kingman, Kansas, United StatesIndependent clue breadth · 5Age · Broad Geography · Household · Spouse · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 34-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • known spouse Julia E (Baker) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (24) at the subject's birth (+7)
  • candidate's birth is 57 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1910), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)

a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 34-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 57 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1910), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • weak broad-area overlap: kansas (+1; not a locality match)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • a known child was born within 7 years of the subject (+1)
  • known spouse Julia E (Baker) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (24) at the subject's birth (+7)

Deductions and cautions: a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15)

Automated fit14/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1849–?Generation38 years age gapRecorded placesNew BrunswickIndependent clue breadth · 3Age · Spouse · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 38-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • known spouse Letitia Lane (Leavitt) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (35) at the subject's birth (+7)
  • candidate's birth is 61 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1910), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)

a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 38-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 61 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1910), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • known spouse Letitia Lane (Leavitt) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (35) at the subject's birth (+7)

Deductions and cautions: a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Automated fit10/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1862–1943Generation25 years age gapRecorded placesBurlington, Des Moines County, Iowa, United States · Oklahoma City, Oklahoma County, Oklahoma, United StatesIndependent clue breadth · 4Age · Spouse · Spouse-Specific Child Window · Two-GenerationSame-spouse child windowAmanda Phyllis (Cline) GlasgowCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 25-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • known spouse Amanda Phyllis (Cline) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (22) at the subject's birth (+7)
  • candidate's birth is 48 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1910), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)

a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 25-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 48 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1910), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1881–1903) (+6; other parent Amanda Phyllis (Cline) Glasgow)
  • known spouse Amanda Phyllis (Cline) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (22) at the subject's birth (+7)

Deductions and cautions: a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Possible mothers5 leads

Automated fit13/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1860–?Generation27 years age gapRecorded placesGlasgowIndependent clue breadth · 3Age · Spouse-Specific Child Window · Two-GenerationSame-spouse child windowRalph GlasgowCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 27-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 50 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1910), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1881–1891) (+6; other parent Ralph Glasgow)

a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 27-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 50 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1910), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1881–1891) (+6; other parent Ralph Glasgow)

Deductions and cautions: a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Automated fit13/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1851–1928Generation36 years age gapRecorded placesMidlothian — exact locality unprovedIndependent clue breadth · 3Age · Spouse-Specific Child Window · Two-GenerationSame-spouse child windowJohn Baigrie GlasgowCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 36-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 59 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1910), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1874–1893) (+6; other parent John Baigrie Glasgow)

a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 36-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 59 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1910), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1874–1893) (+6; other parent John Baigrie Glasgow)

Deductions and cautions: a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Show 3 lower-scoring possible mothers
Automated fit10/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1851–1930Generation36 years age gapRecorded placesMorewood, Winchester, Ontario · Ottawa, OntarioIndependent clue breadth · 3Age · Household · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 36-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 59 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1910), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • a known child was born within 2 years of the subject (+3)

a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 36-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 59 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1910), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • a known child was born within 2 years of the subject (+3)

Deductions and cautions: a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Automated fit9/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1868–1960Generation19 years age gapRecorded placesPennsylvania, United States · Garnett, Anderson, Kansas, United StatesIndependent clue breadth · 4Age · Broad Geography · Household · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 19-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 42 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1910), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • a known child was born within 6 years of the subject (+1)

a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 19-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 42 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1910), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • weak broad-area overlap: kansas (+1; not a locality match)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • a known child was born within 6 years of the subject (+1)

Deductions and cautions: a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15)

Automated fit9/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1863–1953Generation24 years age gapRecorded placesOhio, United States · Garnett, Anderson, Kansas, United StatesIndependent clue breadth · 4Age · Broad Geography · Household · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 24-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 47 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1910), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • a known child was born within 7 years of the subject (+1)

a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 24-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 47 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1910), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • weak broad-area overlap: kansas (+1; not a locality match)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • a known child was born within 7 years of the subject (+1)

Deductions and cautions: a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15)

How parent leads are calculated

Automated leads use birth surnames—not married surnames—as parental eligibility, role-specific biological age limits, bounded and approximate-date uncertainty, household chronology, specific time-aware localities, mapped distance, tenancy succession, migration destinations and sex-aware Scottish naming positions across generations. People already attached as the subject's parents stay in the identity summary and are excluded from this alternative-candidate list, regardless of relationship confidence. The main calibration uses clues available on disconnected profiles; existing parent and sibling links are retained as comparison context rather than treated as transferable evidence. Common ordered names and grandparent-to-child echoes receive a small non-zero weight, so a John or James match can support several independent criteria without producing a lead alone. Rare names, repeated bearers and bundles across otherwise distinct branches receive substantially more weight according to catalogue frequency. An exact migration place is weighted by its rarity and repetition across both branches; a shared destination country is worth only one point. Extra weight is added only when at least three independent clue types converge: naming, locality, specific migration, household chronology or collateral networks. Sparse profiles retain a clearly labelled chronology-only fallback instead of disappearing. Countries, states, counties and research clusters do not count as a shared locality, and fallback, broad representative or kin-inferred coordinates are excluded from distance scoring. Shared descendant profiles are removed before branch-name comparison. A candidate already recorded as a parent-in-law is excluded. A confident or independently supported parent is treated as settled; uncertain and unassessed attachments remain open to alternative comparison. A different linked parent, an uncle/aunt or grandparent path, and a matching existing child profile prevent an alternative from being classified as a strong direct-parent lead until the underlying tree conflict or duplicate is resolved. Familiar forms such as Bessie are normalised. Surname remains an eligibility filter worth zero points.

Naming customs, shared farms and occupations are circumstantial. Children, spouses and collateral relatives may be missing, and tree-derived family networks are not independent evidence. Scores rank research leads; they do not prove parentage.

Automated fit28/100
Similar Person
Dates1893–1978PlacesRector, Clay Co., Arkansas, United States → Rector, Clay, Arkansas, United StatesParent comparisonNo shared parent is indexed
Why it may fit
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 6 (+10)

No indexed conflict

Full comparison detail
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 6 (+10)

Conflicts: No indexed conflict

Same-name candidate

Jesse GlasgowGlasgow-2775

Automated fit18/100
Similar Person
Dates1816–1892PlacesCurrituck, North Carolina, United States → Cumberland City, Stewart County, Tennessee, United StatesParent comparisonNo shared parent is indexed
Why it may fit
  • same first and last name (+18)

record-derived birth estimates differ by 71; retained without deduction

Full comparison detail
  • same first and last name (+18)

Conflicts: record-derived birth estimates differ by 71; retained without deduction

How duplicate leads are calculated

Dates are eligibility gates, not merely deductions: chronologically impossible people are excluded. Dates, places, spouses, parent certainty and children's profiles and names are then compared. A high score is a prompt to inspect records, not a merge recommendation.

Open only what you need

Research & records

Life and record timelineChronological mapped occurrences and their underlying sources.1 record
b. 1887

Profile-stated birthplace: Kansas, United States

Kansas, United States

One-Tree export profile fields are search leads, not sources; relationships are shown only where the export supplies parent links.

One-Tree profile leadunknown
Source and mapping detail

WikiTree profile export for Glasgow-1955

No sufficiently specific citation match found.

Precision: Country-centre fallback for profile locality

Evidence assessmentWhat is supported, uncertain or disputed in the current case model.6 claims
1Derivative
1Tree Only

Documented or strongly supported

No claims in this category have been formally assessed.

Working hypotheses and conflicts

No claims in this category have been formally assessed.

Research questionsOpen problems, missing bridges and the next records to inspect.0 open

No formal open question is recorded for this person.

Sources and provenanceStructured citations and source-quality classifications.2 sources
Technical profile and raw captureDataset metadata, machine dossier and captured WikiTree biography.Advanced

WikiTree profile information

Dataset: ONT_Glasco_2026-08-18T16_05.json · generated 2026-08-20

Machine-readable dossier

WikiTree biography, citations and relationship snapshot

Glasgow-1955 was captured 2026-08-07T09:54:35+00:00; WikiTree profile revision 2022-06-11.

Profile location claims

EventDateLocationStatus
birthKansas, United StatesWikiTree profile field

Immediate relationship snapshot

RelationshipPersonWikiTree IDDates and places returned
ParentsJames Owen GlasgowGlasgow-19541846-00-00 · Ohio, United States · 1923-11-04 · Russell, Kansas, United States
ParentsAmerica Ellen GlasgowGiles-63241853-00-00 · Iowa, United States · 1948-00-00 · Russell, Kansas, United States
ChildrenGordon Blaney GlasgowGlasgow-22971910-06-27 · 1995-12-26 · Kansas City, Clay, Missouri, United States
SiblingsRomieGlasgow-1031882-06-22 · Vincent, Osborne, Kansas, USA · 1977-01-23 · Bossier City, Bossier, Louisiana, USA
SiblingsEffie C GlasgowGlasgow-19561890-01-00 · Kansas, United States · 0000-00-00
SiblingsAllen G GlasgowGlasgow-19571893-11-00 · Kansas, United States · 0000-00-00

Record-bearing passages

  • Biography Jesse was born in 1887. He is the son of James Glasgow and America Giles. Sources

    • "United States Census, 1900," database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:MMYZ-VQ4 : accessed 3 September 2021), Jesse O Glasgow in household of James O Glasgow, Jackson & Winfield Townships, Osborne, Kansas, United States; citing enumeration district (ED) 107, sheet 5B, family 94, NARA microfilm publication T623 (Washington, D.C.: National Archives and Records Administration, 1972.); FHL microfilm 1,240,493.

Profile source citations

  1. "United States Census, 1900," database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:MMYZ-VQ4 : accessed 3 September 2021), Jesse O Glasgow in household of James O Glasgow, Jackson & Winfield Townships, Osborne, Kansas, United States; citing enumeration district (ED) 107, sheet 5B, family 94, NARA microfilm publication T623 (Washington, D.C.: National Archives and Records Administration, 1972.); FHL microfilm 1,240,493. source link 1
Full captured biography text
Biography
Jesse was born in 1887. He is the son of James Glasgow and America Giles. 
Sources
* "United States Census, 1900," database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:MMYZ-VQ4 : accessed 3 September 2021), Jesse O Glasgow in household of James O Glasgow, Jackson & Winfield Townships, Osborne, Kansas, United States; citing enumeration district (ED) 107, sheet 5B, family 94, NARA microfilm publication T623 (Washington, D.C.: National Archives and Records Administration, 1972.); FHL microfilm 1,240,493.
Raw WikiTree biography markup
== Biography ==
Jesse was born in 1887. He is the son of [[Glasgow-1954|James Glasgow]] and [[Giles-6324|America Giles]]. 
== Sources ==
<references />
* "United States Census, 1900," database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:MMYZ-VQ4 : accessed 3 September 2021), Jesse O Glasgow in household of James O Glasgow, Jackson & Winfield Townships, Osborne, Kansas, United States; citing enumeration district (ED) 107, sheet 5B, family 94, NARA microfilm publication T623 (Washington, D.C.: National Archives and Records Administration, 1972.); FHL microfilm 1,240,493.