Individual research record
Enoch Glasgow
c. 1831 – 1885-08-26
Glasgow-2362 · 1 mapped association
At a glance
Identity & family
Tree links organise the family; documentary status still varies.
- Birth
- c. 1831 · Davidson, Tennessee, United States
- Death
- 1885-08-26 · Dickson, Tennessee, United States
- Parents
- Issac Glasgowunmarked
- Spouses
- Kissiah (Mccaslin) Glasgow
- Children
- Sarah Elizabeth Glasgow
- Gender
- Male
- WikiTree
- Glasgow-2362
- Research clusters
- Worldwide One-Tree profile leads
- Mapped descendants
- 1
Comparison context
These child positions and checks are the subject details used to rank possible parents below.
Naming sequence used by the parentage model
Known-position checks: 0 support · 0 conflict. Ordinals retain unnamed children and recognise reused names.
Relationship comparison
Potential parents or duplicates
Compare scored leads with the subject details above—not proof.
Possible fathers5 leads
Possible Father
Robert GlasgowGlasgow-2769
- plausible 41-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 66 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1856), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- known spouse Nancy (Unknown) Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (46) at the subject's birth (+3)
a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15)
Show complete scoring
- plausible 41-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 66 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1856), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- weak broad-area overlap: tennessee (+1; not a locality match)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
- known spouse Nancy (Unknown) Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (46) at the subject's birth (+3)
Deductions and cautions: a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15)
Possible Father
Robert GlasgowGlasgow-1171
- plausible 22-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- known spouse Eliza Jane (Gilmore) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (23) at the subject's birth (+7)
- candidate's birth is 47 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1856), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)
Show complete scoring
- plausible 22-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 47 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1856), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1825–1843) (+6; other parent Eliza Jane (Gilmore) Glasgow)
- known spouse Eliza Jane (Gilmore) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (23) at the subject's birth (+7)
Deductions and cautions: a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)
Show 3 lower-scoring possible fathers
Possible Father
Samuel GlasgowGlasgow-3823
- plausible 27-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- known spouse Elizabeth Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (27) at the subject's birth (+7)
- candidate's birth is 52 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1856), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)
Show complete scoring
- plausible 27-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 52 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1856), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
- subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1830–1846) (+6; other parent Elizabeth Glasgow)
- known spouse Elizabeth Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (27) at the subject's birth (+7)
Deductions and cautions: a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)
Possible Father
Robert GlasgowGlasgow-752
- plausible 34-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- known spouse Mary (Brom) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (28) at the subject's birth (+7)
- candidate's birth is 59 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1856), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)
Show complete scoring
- plausible 34-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 59 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1856), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
- subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1830–1850) (+6; other parent Mary (Brom) Glasgow)
- known spouse Mary (Brom) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (28) at the subject's birth (+7)
Deductions and cautions: a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)
Possible Father
James GlasgowGlasgow-2439
- plausible 42-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- known spouse Sarah Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (37) at the subject's birth (+7)
- candidate's birth is 67 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1856), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)
Show complete scoring
- plausible 42-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 67 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1856), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
- subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1817–1855) (+6; other parent Sarah Glasgow)
- known spouse Sarah Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (37) at the subject's birth (+7)
Deductions and cautions: a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)
Possible mothers5 leads
Possible Mother
Lenora K (Glasgow) RayGlasgow-2085
- plausible 24-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate is associated with the subject's stated birthplace, but not by a reliable near-contemporary record (+10)
- candidate's birth is 49 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1856), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required
Show complete scoring
- plausible 24-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 49 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1856), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- candidate is associated with the subject's stated birthplace, but not by a reliable near-contemporary record (+10)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
Deductions and cautions: No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required
Possible Mother
Sophia GlasgowGlasgow-341
- plausible 30-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate has only broad or undated birth-locality overlap: davidson (+6)
- candidate's birth is 55 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1856), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required
Show complete scoring
- plausible 30-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 55 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1856), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- candidate has only broad or undated birth-locality overlap: davidson (+6)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
Deductions and cautions: No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required
Show 3 lower-scoring possible mothers
Possible Mother
Mary Caroline (Thompson) GlasgowThompson-109946
- plausible 18-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 43 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1856), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- a known child was born within 8 years of the subject (+1)
No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required
Show complete scoring
- plausible 18-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 43 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1856), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- weak broad-area overlap: tennessee (+1; not a locality match)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
- a known child was born within 8 years of the subject (+1)
Deductions and cautions: No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required
Possible Mother
Mary (Unknown) GlasgowUnknown-653364
- plausible 18-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 43 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1856), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- weak broad-area overlap: tennessee (+1; not a locality match)
No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required
Show complete scoring
- plausible 18-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 43 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1856), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- weak broad-area overlap: tennessee (+1; not a locality match)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
Deductions and cautions: No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required
Possible Mother
Permilia GlasgowGlasgow-2618
- plausible 27-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 52 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1856), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- weak broad-area overlap: tennessee (+1; not a locality match)
No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required
Show complete scoring
- plausible 27-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 52 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1856), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- weak broad-area overlap: tennessee (+1; not a locality match)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
Deductions and cautions: No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required
How parent leads are calculated
Automated leads use birth surnames—not married surnames—as parental eligibility, role-specific biological age limits, bounded and approximate-date uncertainty, household chronology, specific time-aware localities, mapped distance, tenancy succession, migration destinations and sex-aware Scottish naming positions across generations. People already attached as the subject's parents stay in the identity summary and are excluded from this alternative-candidate list, regardless of relationship confidence. The main calibration uses clues available on disconnected profiles; existing parent and sibling links are retained as comparison context rather than treated as transferable evidence. Common ordered names and grandparent-to-child echoes receive a small non-zero weight, so a John or James match can support several independent criteria without producing a lead alone. Rare names, repeated bearers and bundles across otherwise distinct branches receive substantially more weight according to catalogue frequency. An exact migration place is weighted by its rarity and repetition across both branches; a shared destination country is worth only one point. Extra weight is added only when at least three independent clue types converge: naming, locality, specific migration, household chronology or collateral networks. Sparse profiles retain a clearly labelled chronology-only fallback instead of disappearing. Countries, states, counties and research clusters do not count as a shared locality, and fallback, broad representative or kin-inferred coordinates are excluded from distance scoring. Shared descendant profiles are removed before branch-name comparison. A candidate already recorded as a parent-in-law is excluded. A confident or independently supported parent is treated as settled; uncertain and unassessed attachments remain open to alternative comparison. A different linked parent, an uncle/aunt or grandparent path, and a matching existing child profile prevent an alternative from being classified as a strong direct-parent lead until the underlying tree conflict or duplicate is resolved. Familiar forms such as Bessie are normalised. Surname remains an eligibility filter worth zero points.
Naming customs, shared farms and occupations are circumstantial. Children, spouses and collateral relatives may be missing, and tree-derived family networks are not independent evidence. Scores rank research leads; they do not prove parentage.
No sufficiently similar same-name person is currently indexed.
How duplicate leads are calculated
Dates are eligibility gates, not merely deductions: chronologically impossible people are excluded. Dates, places, spouses, parent certainty and children's profiles and names are then compared. A high score is a prompt to inspect records, not a merge recommendation.
Open only what you need
Research & records
Life and record timelineChronological mapped occurrences and their underlying sources.1 record
Profile-stated birthplace: Davidson, Tennessee, United States
Davidson, Tennessee, United States
One-Tree export profile fields are search leads, not sources; relationships are shown only where the export supplies parent links.
Source and mapping detail
WikiTree profile export for Glasgow-2362
No sufficiently specific citation match found.
Precision: Country-centre fallback for profile locality
Evidence assessmentWhat is supported, uncertain or disputed in the current case model.4 claims
Documented or strongly supported
No claims in this category have been formally assessed.
Working hypotheses and conflicts
No claims in this category have been formally assessed.
Research questionsOpen problems, missing bridges and the next records to inspect.0 open
No formal open question is recorded for this person.
Sources and provenanceStructured citations and source-quality classifications.2 sources
Source or provenance: quality describes the record layer, not every conclusion drawn from it.
- tree_only Unsourced family tree handed down to Yvonne Eaves.
- tree_only WikiTree profile export for Glasgow-2362
Technical profile and raw captureDataset metadata, machine dossier and captured WikiTree biography.Advanced
WikiTree profile information
Glasgow-2362
Enoch Glasgow
Updated 2024-08-29
Dataset: ONT_Glasco_2026-08-18T16_05.json · generated 2026-08-20
WikiTree biography, citations and relationship snapshot
Glasgow-2362 was captured 2026-08-07T09:54:35+00:00; WikiTree profile revision 2024-08-29.
Profile location claims
| Event | Date | Location | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| birth | — | Davidson, Tennessee, United States | WikiTree profile field |
| death | — | Dickson, Tennessee, United States | WikiTree profile field |
| marriage | 1855-01-08 | Dickson, Tennessee, United States | WikiTree relationship field |
Immediate relationship snapshot
| Relationship | Person | WikiTree ID | Dates and places returned |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parents | Issac Glasgow | Glasgow-2363 | 1800-00-00 · United States · 1870-00-00 |
| Children | Sarah Elizabeth Glasgow | Glasgow-2361 | 1856-02-07 · Tennessee, United States · 1888-01-28 |
| Spouses | Kissiah Glasgow | Mccaslin-740 | 1831-12-14 · Tennessee, United States · 1906-00-00 · 1855-01-08 · Dickson, Tennessee, United States |
Record-bearing passages
- Biography Enoch was born about 1831. He passed away in 1885.
- Unsourced family tree handed down to Yvonne Eaves. Sources
Profile source citations
- Unsourced family tree handed down to Yvonne Eaves.
Full captured biography text
Biography Enoch was born about 1831. He passed away in 1885. Unsourced family tree handed down to Yvonne Eaves. Sources
Raw WikiTree biography markup
== Biography == Enoch was born about 1831. He passed away in 1885. <ref> Unsourced family tree handed down to [[Eaves-1219|Yvonne Eaves]]. </ref> == Sources == <references />