Glasgow Surname Project

Individual research record

James W Glasgow

c. 1849 – 1936

Glasgow-2488 · 1 mapped association

Tennessee, United StatesDallas, Dallas, Texas, United States

At a glance

Identity & family

Tree links organise the family; documentary status still varies.

1Mapped records
4Close relations
3Evidence items
12Candidate leads
Birth
c. 1849 · Tennessee, United States
Death
1936 · Dallas, Dallas, Texas, United States
Parents
Wesley Guynn GlasgowunmarkedVirginia (Hughes) Glasgowunmarked
Spouses
Phebe Ella (Hughes) Glasgow
Children
Gilbert Guynn Glasgow
Gender
Male
WikiTree
Glasgow-2488
Research clusters
Worldwide One-Tree profile leads
Mapped descendants
6

Comparison context

These child positions and checks are the subject details used to rank possible parents below.

Naming sequence used by the parentage model

Paternal grandfather positionGilbert Guynn Glasgow (1879)
Maternal grandfather positionNot identifiable from dated child profiles
Maternal grandmother positionNot identifiable from dated child profiles
Paternal grandmother positionNot identifiable from dated child profiles

Known-position checks: 0 support · 0 conflict. Ordinals retain unnamed children and recognise reused names.

Relationship comparison

Potential parents or duplicates

Compare scored leads with the subject details above—not proof.

Higher-signal leadReview carefullyWeak lead

Possible fathers5 leads

Automated fit26/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1819–1899Generation30 years age gapRecorded placesCoffee County, TennesseeIndependent clue breadth · 5Age · Broad Geography · Household · Spouse · Two-GenerationExisting-tree context (not an independent clue)Rare Sibling-Name PatternCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 30-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 60 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1879), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • known spouse Nancy (Fuller) Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (19) at the subject's birth (+3)

a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 30-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 60 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1879), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • weak broad-area overlap: tennessee (+1; not a locality match)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • subject's birth fits within the candidate's overall child-bearing span (1848–1869) (+3; children are not tied to one spouse)
  • known spouse Nancy (Fuller) Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (19) at the subject's birth (+3)
  • candidate's other children share uncommon given names with the subject's recorded siblings: Lucy +12 (13 public profiles) (+12 total)

Deductions and cautions: a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15)

Automated fit24/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1822–1879Generation27 years age gapRecorded placesIreland, United Kingdom · Middletown, Richmond, New York, United States · Ireland — exact locality unprovedIndependent clue breadth · 6Age · Collateral Naming · Common Grandparent Birth-Order Naming · Household · Spouse · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 27-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 57 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1879), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • known spouse Sarah Jane (Gormley) Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (20) at the subject's birth (+3)

a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 27-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 57 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1879), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • a known child was born within 4 years of the subject (+1)
  • known spouse Sarah Jane (Gormley) Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (20) at the subject's birth (+3)
  • candidate's sibling and niece/nephew network repeats names in the subject's descendant line (three rarest at most): Gilbert +16 (4 public profiles; niece/nephew Gilbert J Glasgow; +2 repetition bonus); Martha +5 (45 public profiles; niece/nephew Martha Emily Glasgow, niece/nephew Martha Glasgow; +2 repetition bonus) (+21 total)
  • the subject would fill the first son position among the candidate's dated children, and the candidate's linked father James Glasgow shares the subject's common given name (+2; Scottish grandparent-name pattern, James in 224 public profiles; WikiTree: uncertain parent; weak alone)

Deductions and cautions: a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Show 3 lower-scoring possible fathers
Automated fit21/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1817–1863Generation32 years age gapRecorded placesWake Co., North Carolina, United States · Weakley, Tennessee, United StatesIndependent clue breadth · 5Age · Broad Geography · Spouse · Spouse-Specific Child Window · Two-GenerationSame-spouse child windowEmily Jane (Newman) GlasgowCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 32-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • known spouse Emily Jane (Newman) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (26) at the subject's birth (+7)
  • candidate's birth is 62 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1879), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)

a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 32-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 62 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1879), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • weak broad-area overlap: tennessee (+1; not a locality match)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1848–1860) (+6; other parent Emily Jane (Newman) Glasgow)
  • known spouse Emily Jane (Newman) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (26) at the subject's birth (+7)

Deductions and cautions: a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15)

Automated fit17/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1829–1916Generation20 years age gapRecorded placesRockbridge, Virginia, United States · Richmond, Virginia, United StatesIndependent clue breadth · 4Age · Household · Spouse · Two-GenerationExisting-tree context (not an independent clue)Rare Sibling-Name PatternCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 20-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • known spouse Vilantia (Lewis) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (19) at the subject's birth (+7)
  • candidate's birth is 50 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1879), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)

a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 20-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 50 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1879), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • a known child was born within 6 years of the subject (+1)
  • known spouse Vilantia (Lewis) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (19) at the subject's birth (+7)
  • candidate's other children share uncommon given names with the subject's recorded siblings: Emily +12 (11 public profiles) (+12 total)

Deductions and cautions: a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Automated fit16/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1814–1871Generation35 years age gapRecorded placesTennessee, United States · White County, Illinois, United StatesIndependent clue breadth · 5Age · Broad Geography · Household · Spouse · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 35-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • known spouse Mary L (Hobson) Glascow had a plausible maternal age (29) at the subject's birth (+7)
  • candidate's birth is 65 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1879), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)

a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 35-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 65 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1879), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same broad administrative area only (+1; not a locality match)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • a known child was born within 4 years of the subject (+1)
  • known spouse Mary L (Hobson) Glascow had a plausible maternal age (29) at the subject's birth (+7)

Deductions and cautions: a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15)

Possible mothers5 leads

Automated fit15/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1824–?Generation25 years age gapRecorded placesBotetourt, Virginia, United StatesIndependent clue breadth · 3Age · Spouse-Specific Child Window · Two-GenerationExisting-tree context (not an independent clue)Rare Sibling-Name PatternSame-spouse child windowJoseph GlasgowCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 25-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 55 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1879), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)

a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 25-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 55 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1879), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1839–1862) (+6; other parent Joseph Glasgow)
  • candidate's other children share uncommon given names with the subject's recorded siblings: Lucy +12 (13 public profiles) (+12 total)

Deductions and cautions: a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Automated fit13/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1823–1908Generation26 years age gapRecorded placesNorth Carolina · Weakley Co, TNIndependent clue breadth · 3Age · Spouse-Specific Child Window · Two-GenerationSame-spouse child windowWagstaff Kennedy GlasgowCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 26-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 56 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1879), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)

a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 26-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 56 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1879), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1848–1860) (+6; other parent Wagstaff Kennedy Glasgow)

Deductions and cautions: a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Show 3 lower-scoring possible mothers
Automated fit11/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1823–1893Generation26 years age gapRecorded placesGriswold, New London, Connecticut, United States · Sprague, New London, Connecticut, United StatesIndependent clue breadth · 3Age · Spouse-Specific Child Window · Two-GenerationExisting-tree context (not an independent clue)Rare Sibling-Name PatternSame-spouse child windowIsaac Moodey GlaskoCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 26-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 56 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1879), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)

a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10); candidate already has another child named James A Glasko (Glasko-22) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 26-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 56 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1879), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1846–1860) (+6; other parent Isaac Moodey Glasko)
  • candidate's other children share uncommon given names with the subject's recorded siblings: Lucy +12 (13 public profiles) (+12 total)

Deductions and cautions: a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10); candidate already has another child named James A Glasko (Glasko-22) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict)

Automated fit11/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1810–1854Generation39 years age gapRecorded placesSt. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri Territory, United States · Osage, Missouri, USAIndependent clue breadth · 3Age · Household · Two-GenerationExisting-tree context (not an independent clue)Rare Sibling-Name PatternCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 39-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 69 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1879), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)

a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 39-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 69 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1879), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • another recorded child shares the subject's birth year (+2; possible twins or date uncertainty)
  • candidate's other children share uncommon given names with the subject's recorded siblings: Lucy +12 (13 public profiles) (+12 total)

Deductions and cautions: a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Automated fit10/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1831–1893Generation18 years age gapRecorded placesCumberland, Virginia, United States · Richmond, Virginia, United StatesIndependent clue breadth · 3Age · Household · Two-GenerationExisting-tree context (not an independent clue)Rare Sibling-Name PatternCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 18-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 48 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1879), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • a known child was born within 6 years of the subject (+1)

a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 18-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 48 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1879), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • a known child was born within 6 years of the subject (+1)
  • candidate's other children share uncommon given names with the subject's recorded siblings: Emily +12 (11 public profiles) (+12 total)

Deductions and cautions: a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

How parent leads are calculated

Automated leads use birth surnames—not married surnames—as parental eligibility, role-specific biological age limits, bounded and approximate-date uncertainty, household chronology, specific time-aware localities, mapped distance, tenancy succession, migration destinations and sex-aware Scottish naming positions across generations. People already attached as the subject's parents stay in the identity summary and are excluded from this alternative-candidate list, regardless of relationship confidence. The main calibration uses clues available on disconnected profiles; existing parent and sibling links are retained as comparison context rather than treated as transferable evidence. Common ordered names and grandparent-to-child echoes receive a small non-zero weight, so a John or James match can support several independent criteria without producing a lead alone. Rare names, repeated bearers and bundles across otherwise distinct branches receive substantially more weight according to catalogue frequency. An exact migration place is weighted by its rarity and repetition across both branches; a shared destination country is worth only one point. Extra weight is added only when at least three independent clue types converge: naming, locality, specific migration, household chronology or collateral networks. Sparse profiles retain a clearly labelled chronology-only fallback instead of disappearing. Countries, states, counties and research clusters do not count as a shared locality, and fallback, broad representative or kin-inferred coordinates are excluded from distance scoring. Shared descendant profiles are removed before branch-name comparison. A candidate already recorded as a parent-in-law is excluded. A confident or independently supported parent is treated as settled; uncertain and unassessed attachments remain open to alternative comparison. A different linked parent, an uncle/aunt or grandparent path, and a matching existing child profile prevent an alternative from being classified as a strong direct-parent lead until the underlying tree conflict or duplicate is resolved. Familiar forms such as Bessie are normalised. Surname remains an eligibility filter worth zero points.

Naming customs, shared farms and occupations are circumstantial. Children, spouses and collateral relatives may be missing, and tree-derived family networks are not independent evidence. Scores rank research leads; they do not prove parentage.

Automated fit46/100
Similar Person
Dates1845–?PlacesTennessee, United StatesParent comparisonNo shared parent is indexed
Why it may fit
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 4 (+18)
  • shared recorded place (+20)

unassessed father attachments differ (−5); unassessed mother attachments differ (−5)

Full comparison detail
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 4 (+18)
  • shared recorded place (+20)

Conflicts: unassessed father attachments differ (−5); unassessed mother attachments differ (−5)

Same-name candidate

James E GlasgowGlasgow-4017

Automated fit43/100
Similar Person
Dates1847–?PlacesCanadaParent comparisonNo shared parent is indexed
Why it may fit
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 2 (+25)

uncertain father attachments differ (no deduction); uncertain mother attachments differ (no deduction)

Full comparison detail
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 2 (+25)

Conflicts: uncertain father attachments differ (no deduction); uncertain mother attachments differ (no deduction)

How duplicate leads are calculated

Dates are eligibility gates, not merely deductions: chronologically impossible people are excluded. Dates, places, spouses, parent certainty and children's profiles and names are then compared. A high score is a prompt to inspect records, not a merge recommendation.

Open only what you need

Research & records

Life and record timelineChronological mapped occurrences and their underlying sources.1 record
b. 1849

Profile-stated birthplace: Tennessee, United States

Tennessee, United States

One-Tree export profile fields are search leads, not sources; relationships are shown only where the export supplies parent links.

One-Tree profile leadunknown
Source and mapping detail

WikiTree profile export for Glasgow-2488

No sufficiently specific citation match found.

Precision: Country-centre fallback for profile locality

Evidence assessmentWhat is supported, uncertain or disputed in the current case model.19 claims
2Derivative
1Tree Only

Documented or strongly supported

No claims in this category have been formally assessed.

Working hypotheses and conflicts

No claims in this category have been formally assessed.

Research questionsOpen problems, missing bridges and the next records to inspect.0 open

No formal open question is recorded for this person.

Sources and provenanceStructured citations and source-quality classifications.3 sources
Technical profile and raw captureDataset metadata, machine dossier and captured WikiTree biography.Advanced

WikiTree profile information

Dataset: ONT_Glasco_2026-08-18T16_05.json · generated 2026-08-20

Machine-readable dossier

WikiTree biography, citations and relationship snapshot

Glasgow-2488 was captured 2026-08-07T09:54:35+00:00; WikiTree profile revision 2026-06-04.

Profile location claims

EventDateLocationStatus
birthTennessee, United StatesWikiTree profile field
deathDallas, Dallas, Texas, United StatesWikiTree profile field

Immediate relationship snapshot

RelationshipPersonWikiTree IDDates and places returned
ParentsWesley Guynn GlasgowGlasgow-24761818-00-00 · Tennessee, United States · 1880-00-00
ParentsVirginia GlasgowHughes-288821820-00-00 · Tennessee, United States · 1880-00-00 · Trousdale, Tennessee, United States
ChildrenGilbert Guynn GlasgowGlasgow-27771879-09-02 · Dixon Springs, Smith, Tennessee, United States · 1943-03-04 · Dallas, Dallas, Texas, United States
SiblingsJoyce Ann WatsonGlasgow-24901841-00-00 · Tennessee, United States · 0000-00-00
SiblingsJohn W GlasgowGlasgow-24851842-00-00 · Tennessee, United States · 0000-00-00
SiblingsElizabeth Dickerson UhlesGlasgow-20791844-07-30 · Tennessee, United States · 1924-03-06 · Fort Worth, Tarrant, Texas, United States
SiblingsAndrew G GlasgowGlasgow-24861845-06-21 · Tennessee, United States · 1912-09-01 · McKeesport, Allegheny, Pennsylvania, United States
SiblingsHettie J GlasgowGlasgow-24871847-00-00 · Tennessee, United States · 0000-00-00
SiblingsWilliam GlasgowGlasgow-24771850-00-00 · Tennessee, United States · 0000-00-00
SiblingsVirginia GlasgowGlasgow-24891851-00-00 · Tennessee, United States · 0000-00-00
SiblingsGranville GlasgowGlasgow-24791854-00-00 · Tennessee, United States · 0000-00-00
SiblingsJosiah GlasgowGlasgow-24781856-04-30 · Tennessee, United States · 0000-00-00 · Trousdale, Tennessee, United States
SiblingsLucy Litton BealGlasgow-24801858-08-14 · Tennessee, United States · 1929-09-16
SiblingsMary GlasgowGlasgow-24811861-00-00 · Tennessee, United States · 0000-00-00
SiblingsCalaminty Alice Margaret JenkinsGlasgow-24821863-03-09 · Tennessee, United States · 1937-06-24 · Hartsville, Trousdale, Tennessee, United States
SiblingsEmily GlasgowGlasgow-24831867-00-00 · Tennessee, United States · 0000-00-00
SiblingsCharley Thorp GlasgowGlasgow-24841871-10-14 · Tennessee, United States · 1950-11-25 · Fort Worth, Tarrant, Texas, United States
SpousesPhebe Ella GlasgowHughes-401671858-00-00 · Monroe, Kentucky, United States · 1939-04-04 · Dallas, Texas, United States · 0000-00-00

Profile categories

Grove Hill Memorial Park, Dallas, Texas Grove_Hill_Memorial_Park,_Dallas,_Texas

Record-bearing passages

  • BiographySources

    • "United States Census, 1850," database with images, FamilySearch (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:MCDC-2B4 : 20 October 2021), James W Glassgow in household of Neely Glassgow, Smith, Tennessee, United States; citing family , NARA microfilm publication (Washington, D.C.: National Archives and Records Administration, n.d.).
    • "United States Census, 1860", database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:M8TK-XZS : 18 February 2021), James Glasgo in entry for Wisley Glasgo, 1860. *

Profile source citations

  1. "United States Census, 1850," database with images, FamilySearch (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:MCDC-2B4 : 20 October 2021), James W Glassgow in household of Neely Glassgow, Smith, Tennessee, United States; citing family , NARA microfilm publication (Washington, D.C.: National Archives and Records Administration, n.d.). source link 1
  2. "United States Census, 1860", database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:M8TK-XZS : 18 February 2021), James Glasgo in entry for Wisley Glasgo, 1860. source link 1
Full captured biography text
BiographySources
* "United States Census, 1850," database with images, FamilySearch (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:MCDC-2B4 : 20 October 2021), James W Glassgow in household of Neely Glassgow, Smith, Tennessee, United States; citing family , NARA microfilm publication (Washington, D.C.: National Archives and Records Administration, n.d.).
* "United States Census, 1860", database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:M8TK-XZS : 18 February 2021), James Glasgo in entry for Wisley Glasgo, 1860.
*
Raw WikiTree biography markup
[[Category:Grove Hill Memorial Park, Dallas, Texas]]
== Biography ==

== Sources ==
<references />
* "United States Census, 1850," database with images, FamilySearch (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:MCDC-2B4 : 20 October 2021), James W Glassgow in household of Neely Glassgow, Smith, Tennessee, United States; citing family , NARA microfilm publication  (Washington, D.C.: National Archives and Records Administration, n.d.).
* "United States Census, 1860", database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:M8TK-XZS : 18 February 2021), James Glasgo in entry for Wisley Glasgo, 1860.
* {{FindAGrave|63426996}}