Glasgow Surname Project

Individual research record

Hugh Glasgow

1769-09-08 – 1818-01-31

Glasgow-2873 · 1 mapped association

Nottingham, Chester County, Province of PennsylvaniaYork, Pennsylvania, United States

At a glance

Identity & family

Tree links organise the family; documentary status still varies.

1Mapped records
12Close relations
4Evidence items
7Candidate leads
Birth
1769-09-08 · Nottingham, Chester County, Province of Pennsylvania
Death
1818-01-31 · York, Pennsylvania, United States
Parents
John Glasgowunmarked
Spouses
Elizabeth (Ramsay) GlasgowMaria (Ramsey) Glasgow
Children
Cunningham Ramsay GlasgowCunningham Sample GlasgowElizabeth (Glasgow) NeeperJames Ramsay GlasgowJohn Neeper GlasgowMary Catherine GlasgowSamuel Ramsay GlasgowWalter Franklin GlasgowWilliam Cranmer Glasgow
Gender
Male
WikiTree
Glasgow-2873
Research clusters
Worldwide One-Tree profile leads
Mapped descendants
16

Comparison context

These child positions and checks are the subject details used to rank possible parents below.

Naming sequence used by the parentage model

Paternal grandfather positionCunningham Ramsay Glasgow (1806)
Maternal grandfather positionSamuel Ramsay Glasgow (1808)
Maternal grandmother positionMary Catherine Glasgow (1817)
Paternal grandmother positionNot identifiable from dated child profiles

Known-position checks: 0 support · 2 conflict. Ordinals retain unnamed children and recognise reused names.

Relationship comparison

Potential parents or duplicates

Compare scored leads with the subject details above—not proof.

Higher-signal leadReview carefullyWeak lead

Possible mothers5 leads

Automated fit34/100
Weak Lead
Dates1757–1840Generationnominally 12 years; approximate dates permit about 15–22 years age gapRecorded placesIreland · Allegheny, Pennsylvania, United States · County Antrim — exact locality unprovedIndependent clue breadth · 5Age · Broad Geography · Rare Branch-Name Recurrence · Rare Name Bundle · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • the nominal 12-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (15–22 years) (+4)
  • candidate's birth is 40 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1797), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • weak broad-area overlap: pennsylvania (+1; not a locality match)

parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction); candidate already has another child named Hugh Glasgow (Glasgow-539) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict)

Show complete scoring
  • the nominal 12-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (15–22 years) (+4)
  • candidate's birth is 40 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1797), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • weak broad-area overlap: pennsylvania (+1; not a locality match)
  • uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Cunningham +18 (3 public profiles; subject branch: Cunningham Ramsay Glasgow, Cunningham Sample Glasgow; candidate branch: Cunningham C Glasgow; +2 repetition bonus); Hugh +7 (36 public profiles; subject branch: Hugh Glasgow; candidate branch: Hugh Glasgow, Hugh Glasgow; +4 repetition bonus) (+29 total including +4 multi-name bonus)

Deductions and cautions: parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction); candidate already has another child named Hugh Glasgow (Glasgow-539) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict)

Automated fit31/100
Weak Lead
Dates1748–1800Generation21 years age gapRecorded placesNashville, Davidson, Tennessee, United StatesIndependent clue breadth · 4Age · Household · Local Sibling Birth · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 21-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 49 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1797), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • a known child was born within 2 years of the subject (+3)

locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 21-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 49 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1797), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • a known child was born within 2 years of the subject (+3)
  • candidate has another child, Elizabeth (Glasgow) Martin, born 3 years from the subject in the same specific birth locality (+6; possible sibling-household clue)

Deductions and cautions: locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Show 3 lower-scoring possible mothers
Automated fit25/100
Weak Lead
Dates1737–1793Generation32 years age gapRecorded placesWindham, North Carolina · Currituck, North Carolina, United StatesIndependent clue breadth · 4Age · Household · Local Sibling Birth · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 32-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 60 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1797), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • a known child was born within 8 years of the subject (+1)

locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 32-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 60 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1797), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • a known child was born within 8 years of the subject (+1)
  • candidate has another child, William Glasgow, born 12 years from the subject in the same specific birth locality (+2; possible sibling-household clue)

Deductions and cautions: locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Automated fit23/100
Chronology-Only Fallback
Dates1749–?Generation20 years age gapRecorded placesMarylandIndependent clue breadth · 3Age · Household · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 20-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 48 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1797), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • a known child was born within 8 years of the subject (+1)

locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 20-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 48 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1797), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • a known child was born within 8 years of the subject (+1)

Deductions and cautions: locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Automated fit22/100
Chronology-Only Fallback
Dates1751–?Generation18 years age gapRecorded placesIrvine, Ayrshire, Scotland · Irvine — AyrshireIndependent clue breadth · 2Age · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 18-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 46 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1797), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)

locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 18-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 46 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1797), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)

Deductions and cautions: locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

How parent leads are calculated

Automated leads use birth surnames—not married surnames—as parental eligibility, role-specific biological age limits, bounded and approximate-date uncertainty, household chronology, specific time-aware localities, mapped distance, tenancy succession, migration destinations and sex-aware Scottish naming positions across generations. People already attached as the subject's parents stay in the identity summary and are excluded from this alternative-candidate list, regardless of relationship confidence. The main calibration uses clues available on disconnected profiles; existing parent and sibling links are retained as comparison context rather than treated as transferable evidence. Common ordered names and grandparent-to-child echoes receive a small non-zero weight, so a John or James match can support several independent criteria without producing a lead alone. Rare names, repeated bearers and bundles across otherwise distinct branches receive substantially more weight according to catalogue frequency. An exact migration place is weighted by its rarity and repetition across both branches; a shared destination country is worth only one point. Extra weight is added only when at least three independent clue types converge: naming, locality, specific migration, household chronology or collateral networks. Sparse profiles retain a clearly labelled chronology-only fallback instead of disappearing. Countries, states, counties and research clusters do not count as a shared locality, and fallback, broad representative or kin-inferred coordinates are excluded from distance scoring. Shared descendant profiles are removed before branch-name comparison. A candidate already recorded as a parent-in-law is excluded. A confident or independently supported parent is treated as settled; uncertain and unassessed attachments remain open to alternative comparison. A different linked parent, an uncle/aunt or grandparent path, and a matching existing child profile prevent an alternative from being classified as a strong direct-parent lead until the underlying tree conflict or duplicate is resolved. Familiar forms such as Bessie are normalised. Surname remains an eligibility filter worth zero points.

Naming customs, shared farms and occupations are circumstantial. Children, spouses and collateral relatives may be missing, and tree-derived family networks are not independent evidence. Scores rank research leads; they do not prove parentage.

Same-name candidate

Hugh GlasgowGlasgow-3470

Automated fit23/100
Similar Person
Dates1752–1831PlacesAyrshire, Scotland → Deer Township, Allegheny, Pennsylvania, United StatesParent comparisonNo shared parent is indexed
Why it may fit
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 17 (+2)
  • overlapping locality (+8)

unassessed father attachments differ (−5)

Full comparison detail
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 17 (+2)
  • overlapping locality (+8)

Conflicts: unassessed father attachments differ (−5)

Same-name candidate

Hugh GlasgowGlasgow-1056

Automated fit19/100
Similar Person
Dates1692–?PlacesKilwinning, Ayrshire, ScotlandParent comparisonSame parent name; profile identity unproved
Why it may fit
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • same parent name without a shared profile ID: John Glasgow (+2)
  • child given-name pattern overlaps: John, William

record-derived birth estimates differ by 77; retained without deduction; unassessed father attachments differ (−5)

Full comparison detail
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • same parent name without a shared profile ID: John Glasgow (+2)
  • child given-name pattern overlaps: John, William

Conflicts: record-derived birth estimates differ by 77; retained without deduction; unassessed father attachments differ (−5)

How duplicate leads are calculated

Dates are eligibility gates, not merely deductions: chronologically impossible people are excluded. Dates, places, spouses, parent certainty and children's profiles and names are then compared. A high score is a prompt to inspect records, not a merge recommendation.

Open only what you need

Research & records

Life and record timelineChronological mapped occurrences and their underlying sources.1 record
b. 1769

Profile-stated birthplace: Nottingham, Chester County, Province of Pennsylvania

Nottingham, Chester County, Province of Pennsylvania

One-Tree export profile fields are search leads, not sources; relationships are shown only where the export supplies parent links.

One-Tree profile leadunknown
Source and mapping detail

WikiTree profile export for Glasgow-2873

No sufficiently specific citation match found.

Precision: Country-centre fallback for profile locality

Evidence assessmentWhat is supported, uncertain or disputed in the current case model.13 claims
3Unknown
1Tree Only

Documented or strongly supported

No claims in this category have been formally assessed.

Working hypotheses and conflicts

No claims in this category have been formally assessed.

Research questionsOpen problems, missing bridges and the next records to inspect.0 open

No formal open question is recorded for this person.

Sources and provenanceStructured citations and source-quality classifications.4 sources
Technical profile and raw captureDataset metadata, machine dossier and captured WikiTree biography.Advanced

WikiTree profile information

Dataset: ONT_Glasco_2026-08-18T16_05.json · generated 2026-08-20

Machine-readable dossier

WikiTree biography, citations and relationship snapshot

Glasgow-2873 was captured 2026-08-07T09:54:35+00:00; WikiTree profile revision 2025-12-06.

Profile location claims

EventDateLocationStatus
birthNottingham, Chester County, Province of PennsylvaniaWikiTree profile field
deathYork, Pennsylvania, United StatesWikiTree profile field

Immediate relationship snapshot

RelationshipPersonWikiTree IDDates and places returned
ParentsJohn GlasgowGlasgow-28711738-00-00 · Glasgow Green, Glasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland · 1792-04-03 · Chester County, Pennsylvania, USA
ChildrenCunningham Sample GlasgowGlasgow-37471797-06-14 · York, Pennsylvania, United States · 1798-02-09
ChildrenJohn Neeper GlasgowGlasgow-37391799-02-24 · York, Pennsylvania, United States · 1873-01-30
ChildrenElizabeth NeeperGlasgow-37461800-12-06 · York, Pennsylvania, United States · 1845-00-00
ChildrenJames Ramsay GlasgowGlasgow-37431802-03-04 · York, Pennsylvania, United States · 1872-07-21 · Harford, Maryland, United States
ChildrenCunningham Ramsay GlasgowGlasgow-37421806-06-29 · Delta, York, Pennsylvania, United States · 1885-11-23
ChildrenSamuel Ramsay GlasgowGlasgow-37441808-07-15 · Delta, York, Pennsylvania, United States · 1876-12-09
ChildrenWilliam Cranmer GlasgowGlasgow-26501812-05-12 · 1879-04-13
ChildrenWalter Franklin GlasgowGlasgow-37451815-03-31 · York, Pennsylvania, United States · 1823-11-14
ChildrenMary Catherine GlasgowGlasgow-37481817-11-22 · York, Pennsylvania, United States
SpousesElizabeth GlasgowRamsay-52771774-12-18 · York, Pennsylvania, United States · 1802-03-11 · 1796-00-00
SpousesMaria GlasgowRamsey-91711779-00-00 · Fawn Township, York, Pennsylvania, United States · 1870-00-00 · York, Pennsylvania, United States · 1804-00-00

Record-bearing passages

  • Biography Hugh Glasgow was born on 8 September 1769 in East Nottingham Township, Chester County, Pennsylvania. He was the son of John Glasgow and Mary Cranmer Glasgow.
  • In 1813, he was elected as a Democratic-Republican to represent Pennsylvania's 4th congressional district in the U.S. House of Representatives. He served in the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Congresses from 4 March 1813 to 3 March 1817. Shortly after leaving Congress, he passed away at the age of 48 on 31 January 1818 in Peach Bottom, Pennsylvania. He was interred at Slate Ridge Burying Ground. Family Hugh Glasgow was married twice:

    • Elizabeth "Betsy" Ramsay Glasgow (1774–1802)
    • Maria "Mary" Ramsay Glasgow (1779–1870) (m. 1804)
  • He was the father of the following children:

Profile source citations

  1. Find A Grave: Hugh Glasgow (https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/12627890/hugh_glasgow) source link 1
  2. History of the U.S. House of Representatives: Hugh Glasgow (https://history.house.gov/People/Detail/13856) source link 1
  3. Wikipedia: Hugh Glasgow (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hugh_Glasgow) source link 1
Full captured biography text
Biography
Hugh Glasgow was born on 8 September 1769 in East Nottingham Township, Chester County, Pennsylvania. He was the son of John Glasgow and Mary Cranmer Glasgow.

Hugh was successful in agricultural pursuits before studying law. He was admitted to the bar and practiced law in Peach Bottom, Pennsylvania. From 1800 to 1813, he served as a judge in York County, Pennsylvania.

In 1813, he was elected as a Democratic-Republican to represent Pennsylvania's 4th congressional district in the U.S. House of Representatives. He served in the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Congresses from 4 March 1813 to 3 March 1817. Shortly after leaving Congress, he passed away at the age of 48 on 31 January 1818 in Peach Bottom, Pennsylvania. He was interred at Slate Ridge Burying Ground.
Family
Hugh Glasgow was married twice:
* Elizabeth "Betsy" Ramsay Glasgow (1774–1802)
* Maria "Mary" Ramsay Glasgow (1779–1870) (m. 1804)

He was the father of the following children:
* Cunningham Sample Glasgow (1797–1798)
* John Neeper Glasgow (1799–1873)
* Elizabeth "Eliza" Glasgow Neeper (1800–1845)
* James Ramsay Glasgow (1802–1872)
* Cunningham Ramsay Glasgow (1806–1885)
* Samuel Ramsay "Sample" Glasgow (1808–1876)
* William Cranmer Glasgow (1812–1879)
* Walter Franklin Glasgow (1815–1823)
* Mary Catherine Glasgow (1817–1817)
Sources
* Find A Grave: Hugh Glasgow (https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/12627890/hugh_glasgow)
* History of the U.S. House of Representatives: Hugh Glasgow (https://history.house.gov/People/Detail/13856)
* Wikipedia: Hugh Glasgow (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hugh_Glasgow)
Raw WikiTree biography markup
== Biography ==
'''Hugh Glasgow''' was born on 8 September 1769 in East Nottingham Township, Chester County, Pennsylvania. He was the son of '''[[Glasgow-2871|John Glasgow]]''' and Mary Cranmer Glasgow.

Hugh was successful in agricultural pursuits before studying law. He was admitted to the bar and practiced law in Peach Bottom, Pennsylvania. From 1800 to 1813, he served as a judge in York County, Pennsylvania.

In 1813, he was elected as a '''Democratic-Republican''' to represent Pennsylvania's 4th congressional district in the U.S. House of Representatives. He served in the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Congresses from 4 March 1813 to 3 March 1817. Shortly after leaving Congress, he passed away at the age of 48 on 31 January 1818 in Peach Bottom, Pennsylvania. He was interred at Slate Ridge Burying Ground.

=== Family ===
Hugh Glasgow was married twice:
* '''Elizabeth "Betsy" Ramsay Glasgow''' (1774–1802)
* '''Maria "Mary" Ramsay Glasgow''' (1779–1870) (m. 1804)

He was the father of the following children:
* '''Cunningham Sample Glasgow''' (1797–1798)
* '''John Neeper Glasgow''' (1799–1873)
* '''Elizabeth "Eliza" Glasgow Neeper''' (1800–1845)
* '''James Ramsay Glasgow''' (1802–1872)
* '''Cunningham Ramsay Glasgow''' (1806–1885)
* '''Samuel Ramsay "Sample" Glasgow''' (1808–1876)
* '''William Cranmer Glasgow''' (1812–1879)
* '''Walter Franklin Glasgow''' (1815–1823)
* '''Mary Catherine Glasgow''' (1817–1817)

== Sources ==
<references />
* [https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/12627890/hugh_glasgow Find A Grave: Hugh Glasgow]
* [https://history.house.gov/People/Detail/13856 History of the U.S. House of Representatives: Hugh Glasgow]
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hugh_Glasgow Wikipedia: Hugh Glasgow]