Glasgow Surname Project

Individual research record

John Glasgow

before 1834 – ?

Glasgow-3141 · 1 mapped association

Birthplace unknownDeath place unknown

At a glance

Identity & family

Tree links organise the family; documentary status still varies.

1Mapped records
1Close relations
2Evidence items
12Candidate leads
Birth
before 1834 · Place not recorded
Death
Not recorded · Place not recorded
Parents
Not recorded
Spouses
Not recorded
Children
Julie Anna Glasgow
Gender
Male
WikiTree
Glasgow-3141
Research clusters
Worldwide One-Tree profile leads
Mapped descendants
1

Comparison context

These child positions and checks are the subject details used to rank possible parents below.

Naming sequence used by the parentage model

Paternal grandfather positionNot identifiable from dated child profiles
Maternal grandfather positionNot identifiable from dated child profiles
Maternal grandmother positionJulie Anna Glasgow (1852)
Paternal grandmother positionNot identifiable from dated child profiles

Known-position checks: 0 support · 0 conflict. Ordinals retain unnamed children and recognise reused names.

Relationship comparison

Potential parents or duplicates

Compare scored leads with the subject details above—not proof.

Higher-signal leadReview carefullyWeak lead

Possible fathers5 leads

Automated fit26/100
Weak Lead
Dates1805–1858Generationat most 29 years age gapRecorded placesHuntington Township, Ross, Ohio, United States · Adair County, Missouri, United StatesIndependent clue breadth · 6Age · Common Grandparent Birth-Order Naming · Household · Same-Sex Generational Naming · Spouse · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • candidate's birth is 47 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1852), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • a known child was born within 1 years of the subject (+3)
  • known spouse Isabella (Glenn) Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (24) at the subject's birth (+3)

locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Show complete scoring
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 29 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
  • candidate's birth is 47 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1852), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • a known child was born within 1 years of the subject (+3)
  • known spouse Isabella (Glenn) Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (24) at the subject's birth (+3)
  • candidate and subject share the given name John (+4; weak direct parent-child name recurrence, 278 public profiles)
  • the subject would fill the first son position among the candidate's dated children, and the candidate's linked father John Glasgow shares the subject's common given name (+2; Scottish grandparent-name pattern, John in 278 public profiles; WikiTree: confident parent; weak alone)

Deductions and cautions: locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Automated fit23/100
Weak Lead
Dates1801–?Generationat most 33 years age gapRecorded placesRasharkin, Kilconway, Antrim · RasharkinIndependent clue breadth · 5Age · Common Grandparent Birth-Order Naming · Household · Same-Sex Generational Naming · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • candidate's birth is 51 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1852), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 33 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
  • subject's birth fits within the candidate's overall child-bearing span (1816–1852) (+3; children are not tied to one spouse)

locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Show complete scoring
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 33 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
  • candidate's birth is 51 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1852), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • subject's birth fits within the candidate's overall child-bearing span (1816–1852) (+3; children are not tied to one spouse)
  • candidate and subject share the given name John (+4; weak direct parent-child name recurrence, 278 public profiles)
  • the subject would fill the first son position among the candidate's dated children, and the candidate's linked father John Glasgow shares the subject's common given name (+2; Scottish grandparent-name pattern, John in 278 public profiles; Working; moderate; weak alone)

Deductions and cautions: locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Show 3 lower-scoring possible fathers
Automated fit22/100
Weak Lead
Dates1795–1850Generationat most 39 years age gapRecorded placesIreland · Hingham, Plymouth, Massachusetts, United States · Ireland — exact locality unprovedIndependent clue breadth · 5Age · Broad Geography · Same-Sex Generational Naming · Spouse · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • candidate's birth is 57 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1852), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • known spouse Mary (Unknown) Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (34) at the subject's birth (+3)
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 39 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)

No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required

Show complete scoring
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 39 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
  • candidate's birth is 57 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1852), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • weak broad-area overlap: massachusetts (+1; not a locality match)
  • known spouse Mary (Unknown) Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (34) at the subject's birth (+3)
  • candidate and subject share the given name John (+4; weak direct parent-child name recurrence, 278 public profiles)

Deductions and cautions: No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required

Automated fit21/100
Weak Lead
Dates1812–1898Generationat most 22 years age gapRecorded placesKillycurragh, Derryloran, County Tyrone, Ireland, United Kingdom · Killycurragh, Derryloran, Cookstown, County Tyrone, Ireland, United Kingdom · Killycurragh townland — Oritor/DerryloranIndependent clue breadth · 4Age · Same-Sex Generational Naming · Spouse · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • candidate's birth is 40 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1852), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • known spouse Matilda (Little) Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (18) at the subject's birth (+3)
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 22 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)

locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Show complete scoring
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 22 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
  • candidate's birth is 40 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1852), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • known spouse Matilda (Little) Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (18) at the subject's birth (+3)
  • candidate and subject share the given name John (+4; weak direct parent-child name recurrence, 278 public profiles)

Deductions and cautions: locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Automated fit21/100
Weak Lead
Dates1801–1835Generationnominally 33 years; true gap uncertain age gapRecorded placesBarony, Lanarkshire, Scotland, United Kingdom · Airdrie, Lanarkshire, Scotland, United Kingdom · Lanarkshire — exact locality unprovedIndependent clue breadth · 4Age · Same-Sex Generational Naming · Spouse · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • candidate's birth is 51 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1852), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • known spouse Elisabeth (McCallum) Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (28) at the subject's birth (+3)
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of nominally 33 years; true gap uncertain (+10; true age remains uncertain)

locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Show complete scoring
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of nominally 33 years; true gap uncertain (+10; true age remains uncertain)
  • candidate's birth is 51 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1852), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • known spouse Elisabeth (McCallum) Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (28) at the subject's birth (+3)
  • candidate and subject share the given name John (+4; weak direct parent-child name recurrence, 278 public profiles)

Deductions and cautions: locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Possible mothers5 leads

Automated fit17/100
Chronology-Only Fallback
Dates1812–1901Generationat most 22 years age gapRecorded placesCounty Tyrone, Ireland · Killycurragh, Derryloran, Cookstown, Tyrone, Ireland · County Tyrone — exact locality unprovedIndependent clue breadth · 3Age · Household · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • candidate's birth is 40 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1852), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • a known child was born within 1 years of the subject (+3)
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 22 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)

locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Show complete scoring
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 22 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
  • candidate's birth is 40 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1852), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • a known child was born within 1 years of the subject (+3)

Deductions and cautions: locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Automated fit17/100
Chronology-Only Fallback
Dates1811–1874Generationat most 23 years age gapRecorded placesMartinsburg, Lewis, New York, United StatesIndependent clue breadth · 3Age · Household · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • candidate's birth is 41 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1852), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • a known child was born within 1 years of the subject (+3)
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 23 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)

locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Show complete scoring
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 23 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
  • candidate's birth is 41 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1852), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • a known child was born within 1 years of the subject (+3)

Deductions and cautions: locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Show 3 lower-scoring possible mothers
Automated fit17/100
Chronology-Only Fallback
Dates1811–?Generationat most 23 years age gapRecorded placesCloghgaldanagh townland (estimated) · Cloghgaldanagh townlandIndependent clue breadth · 3Age · Household · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • candidate's birth is 41 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1852), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • a known child was born within 3 years of the subject (+3)
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 23 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)

locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Show complete scoring
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 23 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
  • candidate's birth is 41 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1852), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • a known child was born within 3 years of the subject (+3)

Deductions and cautions: locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Automated fit17/100
Chronology-Only Fallback
Dates1810–1854Generationat most 24 years age gapRecorded placesSt. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri Territory, United States · Osage, Missouri, USAIndependent clue breadth · 3Age · Spouse-Specific Child Window · Two-GenerationSame-spouse child windowJames Albert GlasgowCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • candidate's birth is 42 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1852), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 24 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)

locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Show complete scoring
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 24 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
  • candidate's birth is 42 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1852), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • subject birth boundary overlaps children attributed to the same parental couple (1821–1849) (+3; other parent James Albert Glasgow)

Deductions and cautions: locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Automated fit17/100
Chronology-Only Fallback
Dates1810–1868Generationat most 24 years age gapRecorded placesMaryland, United States · Adair, Missouri, United StatesIndependent clue breadth · 3Age · Household · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • candidate's birth is 42 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1852), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • a known child was born within 1 years of the subject (+3)
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 24 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)

locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Show complete scoring
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 24 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
  • candidate's birth is 42 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1852), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • a known child was born within 1 years of the subject (+3)

Deductions and cautions: locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

How parent leads are calculated

Automated leads use birth surnames—not married surnames—as parental eligibility, role-specific biological age limits, bounded and approximate-date uncertainty, household chronology, specific time-aware localities, mapped distance, tenancy succession, migration destinations and sex-aware Scottish naming positions across generations. People already attached as the subject's parents stay in the identity summary and are excluded from this alternative-candidate list, regardless of relationship confidence. The main calibration uses clues available on disconnected profiles; existing parent and sibling links are retained as comparison context rather than treated as transferable evidence. Common ordered names and grandparent-to-child echoes receive a small non-zero weight, so a John or James match can support several independent criteria without producing a lead alone. Rare names, repeated bearers and bundles across otherwise distinct branches receive substantially more weight according to catalogue frequency. An exact migration place is weighted by its rarity and repetition across both branches; a shared destination country is worth only one point. Extra weight is added only when at least three independent clue types converge: naming, locality, specific migration, household chronology or collateral networks. Sparse profiles retain a clearly labelled chronology-only fallback instead of disappearing. Countries, states, counties and research clusters do not count as a shared locality, and fallback, broad representative or kin-inferred coordinates are excluded from distance scoring. Shared descendant profiles are removed before branch-name comparison. A candidate already recorded as a parent-in-law is excluded. A confident or independently supported parent is treated as settled; uncertain and unassessed attachments remain open to alternative comparison. A different linked parent, an uncle/aunt or grandparent path, and a matching existing child profile prevent an alternative from being classified as a strong direct-parent lead until the underlying tree conflict or duplicate is resolved. Familiar forms such as Bessie are normalised. Surname remains an eligibility filter worth zero points.

Naming customs, shared farms and occupations are circumstantial. Children, spouses and collateral relatives may be missing, and tree-derived family networks are not independent evidence. Scores rank research leads; they do not prove parentage.

Same-name candidate

John GlasgowGlasgow-3030

Automated fit48/100
Similar Person
Dates1834–?PlacesLanarkshire, Scotland, United KingdomParent comparisonNo shared parent is indexed
Why it may fit
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • same birth year (+30)

No indexed conflict

Full comparison detail
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • same birth year (+30)

Conflicts: No indexed conflict

Same-name candidate

John GlasgowGlasgow-3467

Automated fit48/100
Similar Person
Dates1834–?PlacesAyrshire, Scotland, United KingdomParent comparisonNo shared parent is indexed
Why it may fit
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • same birth year (+30)

No indexed conflict

Full comparison detail
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • same birth year (+30)

Conflicts: No indexed conflict

How duplicate leads are calculated

Dates are eligibility gates, not merely deductions: chronologically impossible people are excluded. Dates, places, spouses, parent certainty and children's profiles and names are then compared. A high score is a prompt to inspect records, not a merge recommendation.

Open only what you need

Research & records

Life and record timelineChronological mapped occurrences and their underlying sources.1 record
b. 1834

Kin-inferred from child Julie Anna Glasgow’s birthplace: Northampton, Hampshire, Massachusetts, United States

Northampton, Hampshire, Massachusetts, United States

One-Tree export profile fields are search leads, not sources; relationships are shown only where the export supplies parent links. This map placement is an estimate from kin and is not a directly recorded location for this person.

Kin-inferred One-Tree profile leadunknown
Source and mapping detail

WikiTree profile export for Glasgow-3141

No sufficiently specific citation match found.

Precision: Kin-inferred relationship locality

Evidence assessmentWhat is supported, uncertain or disputed in the current case model.2 claims
1Derivative
1Tree Only

Documented or strongly supported

No claims in this category have been formally assessed.

Working hypotheses and conflicts

No claims in this category have been formally assessed.

Research questionsOpen problems, missing bridges and the next records to inspect.0 open

No formal open question is recorded for this person.

Sources and provenanceStructured citations and source-quality classifications.2 sources
Technical profile and raw captureDataset metadata, machine dossier and captured WikiTree biography.Advanced

WikiTree profile information

Dataset: ONT_Glasco_2026-08-18T16_05.json · generated 2026-08-20

Machine-readable dossier

WikiTree biography, citations and relationship snapshot

Glasgow-3141 was captured 2026-08-07T09:54:35+00:00; WikiTree profile revision 2024-09-23.

Immediate relationship snapshot

RelationshipPersonWikiTree IDDates and places returned
ChildrenJulie Anna GlasgowGlasgow-38671852-05-01 · Northampton, Hampshire, Massachusetts, United States · 1874-03-10 · Northampton, Massachusetts

Record-bearing passages

  • Biography John was born before 1834. Sources

Profile source citations

  1. "Massachusetts, Town Clerk, Vital and Town Records, 1626-2001", , FamilySearch (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:FCSP-XW5 : Sat Mar 09 09:38:21 UTC 2024), Entry for Joanna Glasgous and John Glasgous, 1 May 1852. source link 1
Full captured biography text
Biography
John was born before 1834. 
Sources
* "Massachusetts, Town Clerk, Vital and Town Records, 1626-2001", , FamilySearch (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:FCSP-XW5 : Sat Mar 09 09:38:21 UTC 2024), Entry for Joanna Glasgous and John Glasgous, 1 May 1852.
Raw WikiTree biography markup
== Biography ==

John was born before 1834. 
== Sources ==
<references />
* "Massachusetts, Town Clerk, Vital and Town Records, 1626-2001", , FamilySearch (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:FCSP-XW5 : Sat Mar 09 09:38:21 UTC 2024), Entry for Joanna Glasgous and John Glasgous, 1 May 1852.