Individual research record
John Glasgow
before 1834 – ?
Glasgow-3141 · 1 mapped association
At a glance
Identity & family
Tree links organise the family; documentary status still varies.
- Birth
- before 1834 · Place not recorded
- Death
- Not recorded · Place not recorded
- Parents
- Not recorded
- Spouses
- Not recorded
- Children
- Julie Anna Glasgow
- Gender
- Male
- WikiTree
- Glasgow-3141
- Research clusters
- Worldwide One-Tree profile leads
- Mapped descendants
- 1
Comparison context
These child positions and checks are the subject details used to rank possible parents below.
Naming sequence used by the parentage model
Known-position checks: 0 support · 0 conflict. Ordinals retain unnamed children and recognise reused names.
Relationship comparison
Potential parents or duplicates
Compare scored leads with the subject details above—not proof.
Possible fathers5 leads
Possible Father
John Glasgow JrGlasgow-2927
- candidate's birth is 47 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1852), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- a known child was born within 1 years of the subject (+3)
- known spouse Isabella (Glenn) Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (24) at the subject's birth (+3)
locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)
Show complete scoring
- bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 29 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
- candidate's birth is 47 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1852), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
- a known child was born within 1 years of the subject (+3)
- known spouse Isabella (Glenn) Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (24) at the subject's birth (+3)
- candidate and subject share the given name John (+4; weak direct parent-child name recurrence, 278 public profiles)
- the subject would fill the first son position among the candidate's dated children, and the candidate's linked father John Glasgow shares the subject's common given name (+2; Scottish grandparent-name pattern, John in 278 public profiles; WikiTree: confident parent; weak alone)
Deductions and cautions: locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)
Possible Father
John GlasgowGlasgow-867
- candidate's birth is 51 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1852), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 33 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
- subject's birth fits within the candidate's overall child-bearing span (1816–1852) (+3; children are not tied to one spouse)
locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)
Show complete scoring
- bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 33 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
- candidate's birth is 51 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1852), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- subject's birth fits within the candidate's overall child-bearing span (1816–1852) (+3; children are not tied to one spouse)
- candidate and subject share the given name John (+4; weak direct parent-child name recurrence, 278 public profiles)
- the subject would fill the first son position among the candidate's dated children, and the candidate's linked father John Glasgow shares the subject's common given name (+2; Scottish grandparent-name pattern, John in 278 public profiles; Working; moderate; weak alone)
Deductions and cautions: locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)
Show 3 lower-scoring possible fathers
Possible Father
John GlasgowGlasgow-3443
- candidate's birth is 57 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1852), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- known spouse Mary (Unknown) Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (34) at the subject's birth (+3)
- bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 39 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required
Show complete scoring
- bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 39 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
- candidate's birth is 57 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1852), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- weak broad-area overlap: massachusetts (+1; not a locality match)
- known spouse Mary (Unknown) Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (34) at the subject's birth (+3)
- candidate and subject share the given name John (+4; weak direct parent-child name recurrence, 278 public profiles)
Deductions and cautions: No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required
Possible Father
John GlasgowGlasgow-2056
- candidate's birth is 40 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1852), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- known spouse Matilda (Little) Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (18) at the subject's birth (+3)
- bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 22 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)
Show complete scoring
- bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 22 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
- candidate's birth is 40 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1852), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- known spouse Matilda (Little) Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (18) at the subject's birth (+3)
- candidate and subject share the given name John (+4; weak direct parent-child name recurrence, 278 public profiles)
Deductions and cautions: locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)
Possible Father
John GlasgowGlasgow-1535
- candidate's birth is 51 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1852), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- known spouse Elisabeth (McCallum) Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (28) at the subject's birth (+3)
- bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of nominally 33 years; true gap uncertain (+10; true age remains uncertain)
locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)
Show complete scoring
- bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of nominally 33 years; true gap uncertain (+10; true age remains uncertain)
- candidate's birth is 51 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1852), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- known spouse Elisabeth (McCallum) Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (28) at the subject's birth (+3)
- candidate and subject share the given name John (+4; weak direct parent-child name recurrence, 278 public profiles)
Deductions and cautions: locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)
Possible mothers5 leads
Possible Mother
Elizabeth (Ferguson) DougalFerguson-8028
- candidate's birth is 40 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1852), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- a known child was born within 1 years of the subject (+3)
- bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 22 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)
Show complete scoring
- bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 22 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
- candidate's birth is 40 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1852), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- a known child was born within 1 years of the subject (+3)
Deductions and cautions: locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)
Possible Mother
Elizabeth (Archer) GlasgowArcher-8030
- candidate's birth is 41 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1852), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- a known child was born within 1 years of the subject (+3)
- bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 23 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)
Show complete scoring
- bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 23 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
- candidate's birth is 41 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1852), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
- a known child was born within 1 years of the subject (+3)
Deductions and cautions: locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)
Show 3 lower-scoring possible mothers
Possible Mother
Ellin (Unknown) GlasgowUnknown-540868
- candidate's birth is 41 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1852), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- a known child was born within 3 years of the subject (+3)
- bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 23 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)
Show complete scoring
- bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 23 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
- candidate's birth is 41 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1852), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- a known child was born within 3 years of the subject (+3)
Deductions and cautions: locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)
Possible Mother
Elizabeth (Groff) GlasgowGroff-325
- candidate's birth is 42 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1852), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 24 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)
Show complete scoring
- bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 24 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
- candidate's birth is 42 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1852), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
- subject birth boundary overlaps children attributed to the same parental couple (1821–1849) (+3; other parent James Albert Glasgow)
Deductions and cautions: locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)
Possible Mother
Isabella (Glenn) GlasgowGlenn-6362
- candidate's birth is 42 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1852), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- a known child was born within 1 years of the subject (+3)
- bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 24 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)
Show complete scoring
- bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 24 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
- candidate's birth is 42 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1852), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
- a known child was born within 1 years of the subject (+3)
Deductions and cautions: locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)
How parent leads are calculated
Automated leads use birth surnames—not married surnames—as parental eligibility, role-specific biological age limits, bounded and approximate-date uncertainty, household chronology, specific time-aware localities, mapped distance, tenancy succession, migration destinations and sex-aware Scottish naming positions across generations. People already attached as the subject's parents stay in the identity summary and are excluded from this alternative-candidate list, regardless of relationship confidence. The main calibration uses clues available on disconnected profiles; existing parent and sibling links are retained as comparison context rather than treated as transferable evidence. Common ordered names and grandparent-to-child echoes receive a small non-zero weight, so a John or James match can support several independent criteria without producing a lead alone. Rare names, repeated bearers and bundles across otherwise distinct branches receive substantially more weight according to catalogue frequency. An exact migration place is weighted by its rarity and repetition across both branches; a shared destination country is worth only one point. Extra weight is added only when at least three independent clue types converge: naming, locality, specific migration, household chronology or collateral networks. Sparse profiles retain a clearly labelled chronology-only fallback instead of disappearing. Countries, states, counties and research clusters do not count as a shared locality, and fallback, broad representative or kin-inferred coordinates are excluded from distance scoring. Shared descendant profiles are removed before branch-name comparison. A candidate already recorded as a parent-in-law is excluded. A confident or independently supported parent is treated as settled; uncertain and unassessed attachments remain open to alternative comparison. A different linked parent, an uncle/aunt or grandparent path, and a matching existing child profile prevent an alternative from being classified as a strong direct-parent lead until the underlying tree conflict or duplicate is resolved. Familiar forms such as Bessie are normalised. Surname remains an eligibility filter worth zero points.
Naming customs, shared farms and occupations are circumstantial. Children, spouses and collateral relatives may be missing, and tree-derived family networks are not independent evidence. Scores rank research leads; they do not prove parentage.
Same-name candidate
John GlasgowGlasgow-3030
- same first and last name (+18)
- same birth year (+30)
No indexed conflict
Full comparison detail
- same first and last name (+18)
- same birth year (+30)
Conflicts: No indexed conflict
Same-name candidate
John GlasgowGlasgow-3467
- same first and last name (+18)
- same birth year (+30)
No indexed conflict
Full comparison detail
- same first and last name (+18)
- same birth year (+30)
Conflicts: No indexed conflict
How duplicate leads are calculated
Dates are eligibility gates, not merely deductions: chronologically impossible people are excluded. Dates, places, spouses, parent certainty and children's profiles and names are then compared. A high score is a prompt to inspect records, not a merge recommendation.
Open only what you need
Research & records
Life and record timelineChronological mapped occurrences and their underlying sources.1 record
Kin-inferred from child Julie Anna Glasgow’s birthplace: Northampton, Hampshire, Massachusetts, United States
Northampton, Hampshire, Massachusetts, United States
One-Tree export profile fields are search leads, not sources; relationships are shown only where the export supplies parent links. This map placement is an estimate from kin and is not a directly recorded location for this person.
Source and mapping detail
WikiTree profile export for Glasgow-3141
No sufficiently specific citation match found.
Precision: Kin-inferred relationship locality
Evidence assessmentWhat is supported, uncertain or disputed in the current case model.2 claims
Documented or strongly supported
No claims in this category have been formally assessed.
Working hypotheses and conflicts
No claims in this category have been formally assessed.
Research questionsOpen problems, missing bridges and the next records to inspect.0 open
No formal open question is recorded for this person.
Sources and provenanceStructured citations and source-quality classifications.2 sources
Source or provenance: quality describes the record layer, not every conclusion drawn from it.
Technical profile and raw captureDataset metadata, machine dossier and captured WikiTree biography.Advanced
WikiTree profile information
Glasgow-3141
John Glasgow
Updated 2024-09-23
Dataset: ONT_Glasco_2026-08-18T16_05.json · generated 2026-08-20
WikiTree biography, citations and relationship snapshot
Glasgow-3141 was captured 2026-08-07T09:54:35+00:00; WikiTree profile revision 2024-09-23.
Immediate relationship snapshot
| Relationship | Person | WikiTree ID | Dates and places returned |
|---|---|---|---|
| Children | Julie Anna Glasgow | Glasgow-3867 | 1852-05-01 · Northampton, Hampshire, Massachusetts, United States · 1874-03-10 · Northampton, Massachusetts |
Record-bearing passages
Biography John was born before 1834. Sources
- "Massachusetts, Town Clerk, Vital and Town Records, 1626-2001", , FamilySearch (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:FCSP-XW5 : Sat Mar 09 09:38:21 UTC 2024), Entry for Joanna Glasgous and John Glasgous, 1 May 1852.
Profile source citations
- "Massachusetts, Town Clerk, Vital and Town Records, 1626-2001", , FamilySearch (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:FCSP-XW5 : Sat Mar 09 09:38:21 UTC 2024), Entry for Joanna Glasgous and John Glasgous, 1 May 1852. source link 1
Full captured biography text
Biography John was born before 1834. Sources * "Massachusetts, Town Clerk, Vital and Town Records, 1626-2001", , FamilySearch (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:FCSP-XW5 : Sat Mar 09 09:38:21 UTC 2024), Entry for Joanna Glasgous and John Glasgous, 1 May 1852.
Raw WikiTree biography markup
== Biography == John was born before 1834. == Sources == <references /> * "Massachusetts, Town Clerk, Vital and Town Records, 1626-2001", , FamilySearch (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:FCSP-XW5 : Sat Mar 09 09:38:21 UTC 2024), Entry for Joanna Glasgous and John Glasgous, 1 May 1852.