Individual research record
James Alexander Glasgow
1835 – ?
Glasgow-3265 · 1 mapped association
At a glance
Identity & family
Tree links organise the family; documentary status still varies.
- Birth
- 1835 · Place not recorded
- Death
- Not recorded · Place not recorded
- Parents
- Not recorded
- Spouses
- Ann (Andrews) Glasgow
- Children
- James Edward Glasgow
- Gender
- Male
- WikiTree
- Glasgow-3265
- Research clusters
- Worldwide One-Tree profile leads
- Mapped descendants
- 4
Comparison context
These child positions and checks are the subject details used to rank possible parents below.
Naming sequence used by the parentage model
Known-position checks: 0 support · 0 conflict. Ordinals retain unnamed children and recognise reused names.
Relationship comparison
Potential parents or duplicates
Compare scored leads with the subject details above—not proof.
Possible fathers5 leads
Possible Father
James Glasgow junGlasgow-1701
- plausible 30-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 60 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1865), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- known spouse Margaret (Henry) Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (25) at the subject's birth (+3)
locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)
Show complete scoring
- plausible 30-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 60 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1865), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1832–1851) (+6; other parent Margaret (Henry) Glasgow)
- known spouse Margaret (Henry) Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (25) at the subject's birth (+3)
- candidate and subject share the given name James (+4; weak direct parent-child name recurrence, 224 public profiles)
- candidate's name matches the first dated son James Edward Glasgow, the expected father position for a male subject (+4; catalogue rarity 0, James in 224 profiles)
- uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Ethel +14 (5 public profiles; subject branch: Ethel May (Glasgow) Dreis; candidate branch: Ethel Doreen (Glasgow) Black) (+14 total)
Deductions and cautions: locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)
Possible Father
Joseph Montgomery GlasgowGlasgow-1829
- plausible 28-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- known spouse Margaret Elizabeth (Black) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (26) at the subject's birth (+7)
- candidate's birth is 58 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1865), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)
Show complete scoring
- plausible 28-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 58 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1865), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
- subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1830–1849) (+6; other parent Margaret Elizabeth (Black) Glasgow)
- known spouse Margaret Elizabeth (Black) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (26) at the subject's birth (+7)
- uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Alice +8 (20 public profiles; subject branch: Alice Mary (Glasgow) Campbell; candidate branch: Alice Elizabeth (Glasgow) Sharp) (+8 total)
Deductions and cautions: locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)
Show 3 lower-scoring possible fathers
Possible Father
Robert Barclay GlasgowGlasgow-835
- plausible 31-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- known spouse Phebe (McFall) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (28) at the subject's birth (+7)
- candidate's birth is 61 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1865), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction); candidate already has another child named James Dwyre Glasgow (Glasgow-838) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict)
Show complete scoring
- plausible 31-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 61 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1865), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
- subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1827–1847) (+6; other parent Phebe (McFall) Glasgow)
- known spouse Phebe (McFall) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (28) at the subject's birth (+7)
- uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Alice +8 (20 public profiles; subject branch: Alice Mary (Glasgow) Campbell; candidate branch: Alice Caroline (Glasgow) Sprague) (+8 total)
Deductions and cautions: locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction); candidate already has another child named James Dwyre Glasgow (Glasgow-838) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict)
Possible Father
James GlasgowGlasgow-2981
- plausible 34-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 64 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1865), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- known spouse Peggy (Hamilton) Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (24) at the subject's birth (+3)
locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)
Show complete scoring
- plausible 34-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 64 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1865), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1831–1846) (+6; other parent Peggy (Hamilton) Glasgow)
- known spouse Peggy (Hamilton) Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (24) at the subject's birth (+3)
- candidate and subject share the given name James (+4; weak direct parent-child name recurrence, 224 public profiles)
- candidate's name matches the first dated son James Edward Glasgow, the expected father position for a male subject (+4; catalogue rarity 0, James in 224 profiles)
Deductions and cautions: locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)
Possible Father
James M GlasgowGlasgow-193
- plausible 36-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- known spouse Sarah (Lyle) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (33) at the subject's birth (+7)
- candidate's birth is 66 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1865), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction); candidate already has another child named James W Glasgow (Glasgow-2183) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict); descendant-name recurrence has no independent household, record, migration or specific-locality anchor (score capped at 39)
Show complete scoring
- plausible 36-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 66 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1865), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
- subject's birth fits within the candidate's overall child-bearing span (1818–1838) (+3; children are not tied to one spouse)
- known spouse Sarah (Lyle) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (33) at the subject's birth (+7)
- candidate and subject share the given name James (+4; weak direct parent-child name recurrence, 224 public profiles)
- candidate's name matches the first dated son James Edward Glasgow, the expected father position for a male subject (+4; catalogue rarity 0, James in 224 profiles)
- uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Alice +8 (20 public profiles; subject branch: Alice Mary (Glasgow) Campbell; candidate branch: Alice Sinnickson Glasgow) (+8 total)
Deductions and cautions: locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction); candidate already has another child named James W Glasgow (Glasgow-2183) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict); descendant-name recurrence has no independent household, record, migration or specific-locality anchor (score capped at 39)
Possible mothers5 leads
Possible Mother
Margaret (Henry) GlasgowHenry-14942
- plausible 25-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 55 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1865), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1832–1851) (+6; other parent James Glasgow jun)
locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)
Show complete scoring
- plausible 25-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 55 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1865), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1832–1851) (+6; other parent James Glasgow jun)
- a candidate spouse matches the first dated son James Edward Glasgow, the expected father position (+3; James in 224 profiles)
- uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Ethel +14 (5 public profiles; subject branch: Ethel May (Glasgow) Dreis; candidate branch: Ethel Doreen (Glasgow) Black) (+14 total)
Deductions and cautions: locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)
Possible Mother
Margaret Elizabeth (Black) GlasgowBlack-18588
- plausible 26-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 56 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1865), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)
Show complete scoring
- plausible 26-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 56 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1865), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
- subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1830–1849) (+6; other parent Joseph Montgomery Glasgow)
- uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Alice +8 (20 public profiles; subject branch: Alice Mary (Glasgow) Campbell; candidate branch: Alice Elizabeth (Glasgow) Sharp) (+8 total)
Deductions and cautions: locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)
Show 3 lower-scoring possible mothers
Possible Mother
Jane (Neill) GlasgowNeill-1934
- plausible 19-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 49 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1865), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- a known child was born within 6 years of the subject (+1)
locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction); candidate already has another child named James L Glasgow (Glasgow-2158) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict)
Show complete scoring
- plausible 19-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 49 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1865), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- a known child was born within 6 years of the subject (+1)
- uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Eva +14 (7 public profiles; subject branch: Eva Jane (Glasgow) Schiffmann; candidate branch: Eva Blanche (Glasgow) Emart) (+14 total)
Deductions and cautions: locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction); candidate already has another child named James L Glasgow (Glasgow-2158) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict)
Possible Mother
Mary (McNeil) GlasgowMcNeil-3468
- plausible 36-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 66 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1865), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- a known child was born within 1 years of the subject (+3)
locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction); candidate already has another child named James W Glasgow (Glasgow-2183) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict)
Show complete scoring
- plausible 36-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 66 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1865), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
- a known child was born within 1 years of the subject (+3)
- a candidate spouse matches the first dated son James Edward Glasgow, the expected father position (+3; James in 224 profiles)
- uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Alice +8 (20 public profiles; subject branch: Alice Mary (Glasgow) Campbell; candidate branch: Alice Sinnickson Glasgow) (+8 total)
Deductions and cautions: locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction); candidate already has another child named James W Glasgow (Glasgow-2183) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict)
Possible Mother
Peggy (Hamilton) GlasgowHamilton-25516
- plausible 24-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 54 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1865), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1831–1846) (+6; other parent James Glasgow)
locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)
Show complete scoring
- plausible 24-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 54 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1865), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1831–1846) (+6; other parent James Glasgow)
- a candidate spouse matches the first dated son James Edward Glasgow, the expected father position (+3; James in 224 profiles)
Deductions and cautions: locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)
How parent leads are calculated
Automated leads use birth surnames—not married surnames—as parental eligibility, role-specific biological age limits, bounded and approximate-date uncertainty, household chronology, specific time-aware localities, mapped distance, tenancy succession, migration destinations and sex-aware Scottish naming positions across generations. People already attached as the subject's parents stay in the identity summary and are excluded from this alternative-candidate list, regardless of relationship confidence. The main calibration uses clues available on disconnected profiles; existing parent and sibling links are retained as comparison context rather than treated as transferable evidence. Common ordered names and grandparent-to-child echoes receive a small non-zero weight, so a John or James match can support several independent criteria without producing a lead alone. Rare names, repeated bearers and bundles across otherwise distinct branches receive substantially more weight according to catalogue frequency. An exact migration place is weighted by its rarity and repetition across both branches; a shared destination country is worth only one point. Extra weight is added only when at least three independent clue types converge: naming, locality, specific migration, household chronology or collateral networks. Sparse profiles retain a clearly labelled chronology-only fallback instead of disappearing. Countries, states, counties and research clusters do not count as a shared locality, and fallback, broad representative or kin-inferred coordinates are excluded from distance scoring. Shared descendant profiles are removed before branch-name comparison. A candidate already recorded as a parent-in-law is excluded. A confident or independently supported parent is treated as settled; uncertain and unassessed attachments remain open to alternative comparison. A different linked parent, an uncle/aunt or grandparent path, and a matching existing child profile prevent an alternative from being classified as a strong direct-parent lead until the underlying tree conflict or duplicate is resolved. Familiar forms such as Bessie are normalised. Surname remains an eligibility filter worth zero points.
Naming customs, shared farms and occupations are circumstantial. Children, spouses and collateral relatives may be missing, and tree-derived family networks are not independent evidence. Scores rank research leads; they do not prove parentage.
Same-name candidate
James GlasgowGlasgow-1676
- same first and last name (+18)
- same birth year (+30)
- child given-name pattern overlaps: James
No indexed conflict
Full comparison detail
- same first and last name (+18)
- same birth year (+30)
- child given-name pattern overlaps: James
Conflicts: No indexed conflict
Same-name candidate
James GlasgowGlasgow-1711
- same first and last name (+18)
- birth years within 2 (+25)
- child given-name pattern overlaps: James
No indexed conflict
Full comparison detail
- same first and last name (+18)
- birth years within 2 (+25)
- child given-name pattern overlaps: James
Conflicts: No indexed conflict
How duplicate leads are calculated
Dates are eligibility gates, not merely deductions: chronologically impossible people are excluded. Dates, places, spouses, parent certainty and children's profiles and names are then compared. A high score is a prompt to inspect records, not a merge recommendation.
Open only what you need
Research & records
Life and record timelineChronological mapped occurrences and their underlying sources.1 record
Profile-stated marriage place: Tenterfield, New South Wales, Australia
Tenterfield, New South Wales, Australia
One-Tree export profile fields are search leads, not sources; relationships are shown only where the export supplies parent links.
Source and mapping detail
WikiTree profile export for Glasgow-3265
No sufficiently specific citation match found.
Precision: Country-centre fallback for profile locality
Evidence assessmentWhat is supported, uncertain or disputed in the current case model.3 claims
Documented or strongly supported
No claims in this category have been formally assessed.
Working hypotheses and conflicts
No claims in this category have been formally assessed.
Research questionsOpen problems, missing bridges and the next records to inspect.0 open
No formal open question is recorded for this person.
Sources and provenanceStructured citations and source-quality classifications.2 sources
Source or provenance: quality describes the record layer, not every conclusion drawn from it.
- derivative Ancestors familysearch
- tree_only WikiTree profile export for Glasgow-3265
Technical profile and raw captureDataset metadata, machine dossier and captured WikiTree biography.Advanced
WikiTree profile information
Glasgow-3265
James Alexander Glasgow
Updated 2025-02-26
Dataset: ONT_Glasco_2026-08-18T16_05.json · generated 2026-08-20
WikiTree biography, citations and relationship snapshot
Glasgow-3265 was captured 2026-08-07T09:54:35+00:00; WikiTree profile revision 2025-02-26.
Profile location claims
| Event | Date | Location | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| marriage | 1864-11-03 | Tenterfield, New South Wales, Australia | WikiTree relationship field |
Immediate relationship snapshot
| Relationship | Person | WikiTree ID | Dates and places returned |
|---|---|---|---|
| Children | Helen | Hinitt-4 | 1863-04-14 · Boonoo Boonoo, New South Wales, Australia · 1899-04-13 · Bungulla, New South Wales, Australia |
| Children | James Edward Glasgow | Glasgow-3264 | 1865-00-00 · Tenterfield, New South Wales, Australia · 1945-04-30 |
| Spouses | Ann Glasgow | Andrews-25691 | 1831-00-00 · 1912-05-16 · Tenterfield, New South Wales, Australia · 1864-11-03 |
Record-bearing passages
Biography James was born in 1835. Sources
- Ancestors familysearch
Profile source citations
- Ancestors familysearch
Full captured biography text
Biography James was born in 1835. Sources * Ancestors familysearch
Raw WikiTree biography markup
== Biography == James was born in 1835. == Sources == <references /> * Ancestors familysearch