Glasgow Surname Project

Individual research record

Hugh Glasgow

1852 – after 1880

Glasgow-3268 · 1 mapped association

Kentucky, United States→Greenup, Greenup, Kentucky, United States
View on mapOpen WikiTreeCompareReport a correction

At a glance

Identity & family

Tree links organise the family; documentary status still varies.

1Mapped records
4Close relations
3Evidence items
12Candidate leads
Birth
1852 · Kentucky, United States
Death
after 1880 · Greenup, Greenup, Kentucky, United States
Parents
Not recorded
Spouses
Anna (Page) Glasgow
Children
Jennie GlasgowLizzie GlasgowWilliam Glasgow
Gender
Male
WikiTree
Glasgow-3268
Research clusters
Worldwide One-Tree profile leads
Mapped descendants
3

Comparison context

These child positions and checks are the subject details used to rank possible parents below.

Naming sequence used by the parentage model

Paternal grandfather positionWilliam Glasgow (1875)
Maternal grandfather positionNot identifiable from dated child profiles
Maternal grandmother positionLizzie Glasgow (1875)
Paternal grandmother positionJennie Glasgow (1878)

Known-position checks: 0 support · 0 conflict. Ordinals retain unnamed children and recognise reused names.

Relationship comparison

Potential parents or duplicates

Compare scored leads with the subject details above—not proof.

Higher-signal leadReview carefullyWeak lead

Possible fathers5 leads

Automated fit35/100
Weak Lead
Dates1807–1857Generation45 years age gapRecorded placesBakerstown, Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, United States · Des Moines County, Iowa, United States · Bakerstown, Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, USAIndependent clue breadth · 5Age · Rare Branch-Name Recurrence · Spouse · Spouse-Specific Child Window · Two-GenerationSame-spouse child windowSarah (Taggart) GlasgowCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 45-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 68 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1875), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • known spouse Sarah (Taggart) Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (38) at the subject's birth (+3)

same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 45-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 68 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1875), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1832–1854) (+6; other parent Sarah (Taggart) Glasgow)
  • known spouse Sarah (Taggart) Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (38) at the subject's birth (+3)
  • uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Jennie +14 (7 public profiles; subject branch: Jennie Glasgow; candidate branch: Jennie Maude (Glasgow) Brode) (+14 total)

Deductions and cautions: same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Automated fit33/100
Weak Lead
Dates1816–1894Generation36 years age gapRecorded placesTennessee · Union County, IllinoisIndependent clue breadth · 4Age · Sex-Aware Ordered Naming · Spouse · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 36-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • known spouse Lucretia Evaline (Watkins) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (17) at the subject's birth (+7)
  • candidate's birth is 59 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1875), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)

locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 36-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 59 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1875), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • known spouse Lucretia Evaline (Watkins) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (17) at the subject's birth (+7)
  • candidate's name matches the first dated son William Glasgow, the expected father position for a male subject (+4; catalogue rarity 0, William in 223 profiles)

Deductions and cautions: locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Show 3 lower-scoring possible fathers
Automated fit29/100
Weak Lead
Dates1824–1909Generation28 years age gapRecorded placesTranquility, Scott Township, Adams, Ohio, United States · Courtland, Republic, Kansas, United StatesIndependent clue breadth · 5Age · Sex-Aware Ordered Naming · Spouse · Spouse-Specific Child Window · Two-GenerationSame-spouse child windowNancy Ann (Campbell) GlasgowCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 28-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • known spouse Nancy Ann (Campbell) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (27) at the subject's birth (+7)
  • candidate's birth is 51 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1875), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)

same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 28-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 51 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1875), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1847–1869) (+6; other parent Nancy Ann (Campbell) Glasgow)
  • known spouse Nancy Ann (Campbell) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (27) at the subject's birth (+7)
  • candidate's name matches the first dated son William Glasgow, the expected father position for a male subject (+4; catalogue rarity 0, William in 223 profiles)

Deductions and cautions: same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Automated fit29/100
Weak Lead
Dates1823–1885Generation29 years age gapRecorded placesAntis Township, Blair County, Pennsylvania, United States · Altoona, Blair, Pennsylvania, United States · Antis Township, Blair County, Pa.Independent clue breadth · 4Age · Household · Rare Branch-Name Recurrence · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 29-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 52 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1875), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)

same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 29-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 52 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1875), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • subject's birth fits within the candidate's overall child-bearing span (1848–1863) (+3; children are not tied to one spouse)
  • uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Jennie +14 (7 public profiles; subject branch: Jennie Glasgow; candidate branch: Jennie Mary Glasgow) (+14 total)

Deductions and cautions: same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Automated fit29/100
Weak Lead
Dates1818–1886Generation34 years age gapRecorded placesScott Township, Adams, Ohio, United States · Washington, Washington, Iowa, United StatesIndependent clue breadth · 5Age · Sex-Aware Ordered Naming · Spouse · Spouse-Specific Child Window · Two-GenerationSame-spouse child windowMargaret Ann (Wright) GlasgowCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 34-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • known spouse Margaret Ann (Wright) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (29) at the subject's birth (+7)
  • candidate's birth is 57 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1875), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)

same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 34-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 57 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1875), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1841–1864) (+6; other parent Margaret Ann (Wright) Glasgow)
  • known spouse Margaret Ann (Wright) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (29) at the subject's birth (+7)
  • candidate's name matches the first dated son William Glasgow, the expected father position for a male subject (+4; catalogue rarity 0, William in 223 profiles)

Deductions and cautions: same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Possible mothers5 leads

Automated fit32/100
Weak Lead
Dates1814–1895Generation38 years age gapRecorded placesCounty Antrim, Ireland · Blanchard, Page, Iowa, United States · County Antrim — exact locality unprovedIndependent clue breadth · 4Age · Rare Branch-Name Recurrence · Spouse-Specific Child Window · Two-GenerationSame-spouse child windowRobert Alexander GlasgowCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 38-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 61 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1875), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1832–1854) (+6; other parent Robert Alexander Glasgow)

same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 38-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 61 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1875), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1832–1854) (+6; other parent Robert Alexander Glasgow)
  • uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Jennie +14 (7 public profiles; subject branch: Jennie Glasgow; candidate branch: Jennie Maude (Glasgow) Brode) (+14 total)

Deductions and cautions: same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Automated fit21/100
Weak Lead
Dates1825–1918Generation27 years age gapRecorded placesWinchester Township, Adams, Ohio, United States · Courtland, Republic, Kansas, United StatesIndependent clue breadth · 4Age · Sex-Aware Ordered Naming · Spouse-Specific Child Window · Two-GenerationSame-spouse child windowWilliam Allen GlasgowCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 27-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 50 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1875), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)

same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 27-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 50 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1875), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1847–1869) (+6; other parent William Allen Glasgow)
  • a candidate spouse matches the first dated son William Glasgow, the expected father position (+3; William in 223 profiles)

Deductions and cautions: same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Show 3 lower-scoring possible mothers
Automated fit21/100
Weak Lead
Dates1823–1898Generation29 years age gapRecorded placesNewburgh, Orange, New York, United States · Washington, Iowa, United StatesIndependent clue breadth · 4Age · Sex-Aware Ordered Naming · Spouse-Specific Child Window · Two-GenerationSame-spouse child windowWilliam Madison GlasgowCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 29-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 52 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1875), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)

same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 29-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 52 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1875), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1841–1864) (+6; other parent William Madison Glasgow)
  • a candidate spouse matches the first dated son William Glasgow, the expected father position (+3; William in 223 profiles)

Deductions and cautions: same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Automated fit18/100
Weak Lead
Dates1835–1897Generation17 years age gapRecorded placesCalloway, Kentucky, United States · Union County, Illinois, United StatesIndependent clue breadth · 4Age · Broad Geography · Sex-Aware Ordered Naming · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • possible 17-year parent-child age gap (+10)
  • candidate's birth is 40 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1875), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • weak broad-area overlap: kentucky (+1; not a locality match)

No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required

Show complete scoring
  • possible 17-year parent-child age gap (+10)
  • candidate's birth is 40 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1875), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • weak broad-area overlap: kentucky (+1; not a locality match)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • a candidate spouse matches the first dated son William Glasgow, the expected father position (+3; William in 223 profiles)

Deductions and cautions: No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required

Automated fit18/100
Weak Lead
Dates1829–1861Generation23 years age gapRecorded placesBallynagilly, County Tyrone, Ireland · Staten Island, New York City, New York, United States · Lissan civil parish — Cookstown areaIndependent clue breadth · 4Age · Household · Sex-Aware Ordered Naming · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 23-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 46 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1875), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • a known child was born within 1 years of the subject (+3)

same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 23-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 46 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1875), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • a known child was born within 1 years of the subject (+3)
  • a candidate spouse matches the first dated son William Glasgow, the expected father position (+3; William in 223 profiles)

Deductions and cautions: same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

How parent leads are calculated

Automated leads use birth surnames—not married surnames—as parental eligibility, role-specific biological age limits, bounded and approximate-date uncertainty, household chronology, specific time-aware localities, mapped distance, tenancy succession, migration destinations and sex-aware Scottish naming positions across generations. People already attached as the subject's parents stay in the identity summary and are excluded from this alternative-candidate list, regardless of relationship confidence. The main calibration uses clues available on disconnected profiles; existing parent and sibling links are retained as comparison context rather than treated as transferable evidence. Common ordered names and grandparent-to-child echoes receive a small non-zero weight, so a John or James match can support several independent criteria without producing a lead alone. Rare names, repeated bearers and bundles across otherwise distinct branches receive substantially more weight according to catalogue frequency. An exact migration place is weighted by its rarity and repetition across both branches; a shared destination country is worth only one point. Extra weight is added only when at least three independent clue types converge: naming, locality, specific migration, household chronology or collateral networks. Sparse profiles retain a clearly labelled chronology-only fallback instead of disappearing. Countries, states, counties and research clusters do not count as a shared locality, and fallback, broad representative or kin-inferred coordinates are excluded from distance scoring. Shared descendant profiles are removed before branch-name comparison. A candidate already recorded as a parent-in-law is excluded. A confident or independently supported parent is treated as settled; uncertain and unassessed attachments remain open to alternative comparison. A different linked parent, an uncle/aunt or grandparent path, and a matching existing child profile prevent an alternative from being classified as a strong direct-parent lead until the underlying tree conflict or duplicate is resolved. Familiar forms such as Bessie are normalised. Surname remains an eligibility filter worth zero points.

Naming customs, shared farms and occupations are circumstantial. Children, spouses and collateral relatives may be missing, and tree-derived family networks are not independent evidence. Scores rank research leads; they do not prove parentage.

Automated fit20/100
Similar Person
Dates1834–?PlacesSt. John, New BrunswickParent comparisonNo shared parent is indexed
Why it may fit
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 18 (+2)

No indexed conflict

Full comparison detail
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 18 (+2)

Conflicts: No indexed conflict

Open side-by-side comparison

Same-name candidate

Hugh GlasgowGlasgow-2540

Automated fit18/100
Similar Person
Dates1805–1899PlacesGortin, Derryloran, Cookstown, County Tyrone, Ireland, United Kingdom → Carleton, Yarmouth, Yarmouth, Nova Scotia, CanadaParent comparisonNo shared parent is indexed
Why it may fit
  • same first and last name (+18)

record-derived birth estimates differ by 47; retained without deduction

Full comparison detail
  • same first and last name (+18)

Conflicts: record-derived birth estimates differ by 47; retained without deduction

Open side-by-side comparison
How duplicate leads are calculated

Dates are eligibility gates, not merely deductions: chronologically impossible people are excluded. Dates, places, spouses, parent certainty and children's profiles and names are then compared. A high score is a prompt to inspect records, not a merge recommendation.

Open only what you need

Research & records

Life and record timelineChronological mapped occurrences and their underlying sources.1 record
b. 1852

Profile-stated birthplace: Kentucky, United States

Kentucky, United States

One-Tree export profile fields are search leads, not sources; relationships are shown only where the export supplies parent links.

One-Tree profile leadunknown
Source and mapping detail

WikiTree profile export for Glasgow-3268

No sufficiently specific citation match found.

Precision: Country-centre fallback for profile locality

Evidence assessmentWhat is supported, uncertain or disputed in the current case model.5 claims
1Derivative
1Original
1Tree Only

Documented or strongly supported

No claims in this category have been formally assessed.

Working hypotheses and conflicts

No claims in this category have been formally assessed.

Research questionsOpen problems, missing bridges and the next records to inspect.0 open

No formal open question is recorded for this person.

Sources and provenanceStructured citations and source-quality classifications.3 sources

Source or provenance: quality describes the record layer, not every conclusion drawn from it.

  1. original Marriage: "Kentucky, U.S., Compiled Marriages, 1851-1900" Original data: Dodd, Jordan, comp. Kentucky Marriages, 1851-1900. See extended description for original data sources listed by county (accessed 4 March 2025)
  2. derivative 1880 Census: "1880 United States Federal Census" Year: 1880; Census Place: Greenup, Greenup, Kentucky; Roll: 417; Page: 15a; Enumeration District: 038 - (accessed 4 March 2025); "United States, Census, 1880", , FamilySearch ( : Sun Jan 19 03:23:58 UTC 2025), Entry for Hugh Glasgow and Ann Glasgow, 1880. :: Hugh Glasgow M Black 28 Married Head Coalminer Kentucky :: Ann Glasgow F Black 23 Married Wife Keeps house Kentu…
  3. tree_only WikiTree profile export for Glasgow-3268
Technical profile and raw captureDataset metadata, machine dossier and captured WikiTree biography.Advanced

WikiTree profile information

Dataset: ONT_Glasco_2026-08-18T16_05.json · generated 2026-08-20

Machine-readable dossier

WikiTree biography, citations and relationship snapshot

Glasgow-3268 was captured 2026-08-07T09:54:35+00:00; WikiTree profile revision 2025-03-04.

Profile location claims

EventDateLocationStatus
birth—Kentucky, United StatesWikiTree profile field
death—Greenup, Greenup, Kentucky, United StatesWikiTree profile field
marriage1876-02-29Greenup, Kentucky, United StatesWikiTree relationship field

Immediate relationship snapshot

RelationshipPersonWikiTree IDDates and places returned
ChildrenLizzie GlasgowGlasgow-32701875-00-00 · Kentucky, United States · 1880-00-00 · Greenup, Greenup, Kentucky, United States
ChildrenWilliam GlasgowGlasgow-32711875-05-22 · Wurtland, Greenup, Kentucky, United States · 1934-02-01 · Portsmouth, Scioto, Ohio, United States
ChildrenJennie GlasgowGlasgow-32691878-01-24 · Greenup, Greenup, Kentucky, United States · 1960-10-25 · Bluefield, Mercer, West Virginia, United States
SpousesAnna GlasgowPage-201841855-00-00 · Greenup, Kentucky, United States · 1880-00-00 · Greenup, Greenup, Kentucky, United States · 1876-02-29

Profile categories

Greenup, Kentucky Greenup,_Kentucky US Black Heritage Project, Needs Biography US_Black_Heritage_Project,_Needs_Biography

Record-bearing passages

  • Biography Hugh was born in 1852 in Kentucky. He passed away after the 1880 census.
  • Hugh Glascoe married Anna Page on 29 February 1876 in Greenup, Kentucky. Marriage: "Kentucky, U.S., Compiled Marriages, 1851-1900" Original data: Dodd, Jordan, comp. Kentucky Marriages, 1851-1900. See extended description for original data sources listed by county (accessed 4 March 2025)
  • In the 1880 census Hugh Glasgow (age 28), coal miner, was the married head of household in Greenup, Greenup, Kentucky with wife and three children. 1880 Census: "1880 United States Federal Census" Year: 1880; Census Place: Greenup, Greenup, Kentucky; Roll: 417; Page: 15a; Enumeration District: 038 - (accessed 4 March 2025); "United States, Census, 1880", , FamilySearch (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:MCCL-S2H : Sun Jan 19 03:23:58 UTC 2025), Entry for Hugh Glasgow and Ann Glasgow, 1880. :: Hugh Glasgow M Black 28 Married Head Coalminer Kentucky :: Ann Glasgow F Black 23 Married Wife Keeps house Kentucky :: Lizzie Glasgow F Black 5 Single Daughter Kentucky :: William Glasgow M Black 3 Single Son Kentucky :: Jennie Glasgow F Black 2 Single Daughter Kentucky Sources

Profile source citations

  1. Marriage: "Kentucky, U.S., Compiled Marriages, 1851-1900" Original data: Dodd, Jordan, comp. Kentucky Marriages, 1851-1900. See extended description for original data sources listed by county (accessed 4 March 2025)
  2. 1880 Census: "1880 United States Federal Census" Year: 1880; Census Place: Greenup, Greenup, Kentucky; Roll: 417; Page: 15a; Enumeration District: 038 - (accessed 4 March 2025); "United States, Census, 1880", , FamilySearch (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:MCCL-S2H : Sun Jan 19 03:23:58 UTC 2025), Entry for Hugh Glasgow and Ann Glasgow, 1880. :: Hugh Glasgow M Black 28 Married Head Coalminer Kentucky :: Ann Glasgow F Black 23 Married Wife Keeps house Kentucky :: Lizzie Glasgow F Black 5 Single Daughter Kentucky :: William Glasgow M Black 3 Single Son Kentucky :: Jennie Glasgow F Black 2 Single Daughter Kentucky source link 1
Full captured biography text
Biography
Hugh was born in 1852 in Kentucky. He passed away after the 1880 census.

Hugh Glascoe married Anna Page on 29 February 1876 in Greenup, Kentucky. 
Marriage:
"Kentucky, U.S., Compiled Marriages, 1851-1900" 
Original data: Dodd, Jordan, comp. Kentucky Marriages, 1851-1900. See extended description for original data sources listed by county 
 (accessed 4 March 2025)

In the 1880 census Hugh Glasgow (age 28), coal miner, was the married head of household in Greenup, Greenup, Kentucky with wife and three children. 
1880 Census:
"1880 United States Federal Census" 
Year: 1880; Census Place: Greenup, Greenup, Kentucky; Roll: 417; Page: 15a; Enumeration District: 038 
 - (accessed 4 March 2025); "United States, Census, 1880", , FamilySearch (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:MCCL-S2H : Sun Jan 19 03:23:58 UTC 2025), Entry for Hugh Glasgow and Ann Glasgow, 1880.
:: Hugh Glasgow M Black 28 Married Head Coalminer Kentucky
:: Ann Glasgow F Black 23 Married Wife Keeps house Kentucky
:: Lizzie Glasgow F Black 5 Single Daughter Kentucky
:: William Glasgow M Black 3 Single Son Kentucky
:: Jennie Glasgow F Black 2 Single Daughter Kentucky
Sources
Raw WikiTree biography markup
[[Category:US Black Heritage Project, Needs Biography]]
[[Category:Greenup, Kentucky]]
== Biography ==
{{African-American Sticker}}

Hugh was born in 1852 in Kentucky.  He passed away after the 1880 census.

Hugh Glascoe married Anna Page on 29 February 1876 in Greenup, Kentucky.<ref>
'''Marriage''':
"Kentucky, U.S., Compiled Marriages, 1851-1900"<br/>
Original data: Dodd, Jordan, comp. Kentucky Marriages, 1851-1900. See extended description for original data sources listed by county<br/>
{{Ancestry Record|4428|10705}} (accessed 4 March 2025)
</ref>

In the 1880 census Hugh Glasgow (age 28), coal miner, was the married head of household in Greenup, Greenup, Kentucky with wife and three children.<ref>
'''1880 Census''':
"1880 United States Federal Census"<br/>
Year: 1880; Census Place: Greenup, Greenup, Kentucky; Roll: 417; Page: 15a; Enumeration District: 038<br/>
{{Ancestry Sharing|33167368|7b22746f6b656e223a22476d4c47453957575a64706b673244664b4b6c345665706c786f4658795436586f3470566837744d7755513d222c22746f6b656e5f76657273696f6e223a225632227d}} - {{Ancestry Record|6742|42065284}} (accessed 4 March 2025); "United States, Census, 1880", , FamilySearch (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:MCCL-S2H : Sun Jan 19 03:23:58 UTC 2025), Entry for Hugh Glasgow and Ann Glasgow, 1880.
:: Hugh Glasgow    M    Black    28    Married    Head    Coalminer    Kentucky
:: Ann Glasgow    F    Black    23    Married    Wife    Keeps house    Kentucky
:: Lizzie Glasgow    F    Black    5    Single    Daughter        Kentucky
:: William Glasgow    M    Black    3    Single    Son        Kentucky
:: Jennie Glasgow    F    Black    2    Single    Daughter        Kentucky
</ref>

== Sources ==
<references />