Individual research record
Robert Glasgow
1837 – ?
Glasgow-3464 · 1 mapped association
At a glance
Identity & family
Tree links organise the family; documentary status still varies.
- Birth
- 1837 · Ayrshire, Scotland, United Kingdom
- Death
- Not recorded · Place not recorded
- Parents
- John GlasgowunmarkedMary (Boyd) Glasgowunmarked
- Spouses
- Not recorded
- Children
- John Glasgow
- Gender
- Male
- WikiTree
- Glasgow-3464
- Research clusters
- Scotland One-Tree profile leads
- Mapped descendants
- 1
Comparison context
These child positions and checks are the subject details used to rank possible parents below.
Naming sequence used by the parentage model
Known-position checks: 0 support · 0 conflict. Ordinals retain unnamed children and recognise reused names.
Relationship comparison
Potential parents or duplicates
Compare scored leads with the subject details above—not proof.
Possible fathers5 leads
Possible Father
Robert GlasgowGlasgow-3415
- plausible 37-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- known spouse Margaret (Williamson) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (30) at the subject's birth (+7)
- candidate's birth is 57 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1857), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15)
Show complete scoring
- plausible 37-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 57 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1857), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- weak broad-area overlap: ayrshire (+1; not a locality match)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
- subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1832–1838) (+6; other parent Margaret (Williamson) Glasgow)
- known spouse Margaret (Williamson) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (30) at the subject's birth (+7)
- candidate and subject share the given name Robert (+4; weak direct parent-child name recurrence, 165 public profiles)
Deductions and cautions: a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15)
Possible Father
Robert GlasgowGlasgow-3428
- plausible 37-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- known spouse Jane (McConnachie) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (37) at the subject's birth (+7)
- candidate's birth is 57 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1857), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); candidate already has another child named Robert Glasgow (Glasgow-3427) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict)
Show complete scoring
- plausible 37-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 57 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1857), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- same broad administrative area only (+1; not a locality match)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
- known spouse Jane (McConnachie) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (37) at the subject's birth (+7)
- candidate and subject share the given name Robert (+4; weak direct parent-child name recurrence, 165 public profiles)
Deductions and cautions: a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); candidate already has another child named Robert Glasgow (Glasgow-3427) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict)
Show 3 lower-scoring possible fathers
Possible Father
Hugh GlasgowGlasgow-3391
- plausible 45-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- known spouse Margaret (Millar) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (44) at the subject's birth (+7)
- candidate's birth is 65 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1857), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15)
Show complete scoring
- plausible 45-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 65 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1857), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- same broad administrative area only (+1; not a locality match)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
- known spouse Margaret (Millar) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (44) at the subject's birth (+7)
Deductions and cautions: a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15)
Possible Father
John GlasgowGlasgow-3051
- possible 46-year parent-child age gap (+10)
- candidate's birth is 66 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1857), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- known spouse Janet (Gemmill) Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (41) at the subject's birth (+3)
a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15)
Show complete scoring
- possible 46-year parent-child age gap (+10)
- candidate's birth is 66 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1857), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- same broad administrative area only (+1; not a locality match)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
- subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1806–1841) (+6; other parent Janet (Gemmill) Glasgow)
- known spouse Janet (Gemmill) Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (41) at the subject's birth (+3)
- candidate's name matches the first dated son John Glasgow, the expected father position for a male subject (+4; catalogue rarity 0, John in 278 profiles)
Deductions and cautions: a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15)
Possible Father
James GlasgowGlasgow-1573
- plausible 38-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- known spouse Margaret (Anderson) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (33) at the subject's birth (+7)
- candidate's birth is 58 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1857), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); candidate already has another child named Robert Glasgow (Glasgow-3309) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict)
Show complete scoring
- plausible 38-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 58 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1857), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- weak broad-area overlap: ayrshire (+1; not a locality match)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
- a known child was born within 8 years of the subject (+1)
- known spouse Margaret (Anderson) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (33) at the subject's birth (+7)
Deductions and cautions: a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); candidate already has another child named Robert Glasgow (Glasgow-3309) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict)
Possible mothers5 leads
Possible Mother
Nancy (Coburn) GlasgowCoburn-2653
- plausible 37-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 57 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1857), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1834–1838) (+6; other parent Edward Glasgow)
a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)
Show complete scoring
- plausible 37-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 57 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1857), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1834–1838) (+6; other parent Edward Glasgow)
Deductions and cautions: a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)
Possible Mother
Margaret Eve (Markel) GlasgowMarkel-547
- plausible 37-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 57 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1857), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- a known child was born within 2 years of the subject (+3)
a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)
Show complete scoring
- plausible 37-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 57 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1857), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- a known child was born within 2 years of the subject (+3)
Deductions and cautions: a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)
Show 3 lower-scoring possible mothers
Possible Mother
Janet (Gemmill) GlasgowGemmill-363
- possible 41-year parent-child age gap (+10)
- candidate's birth is 61 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1857), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- same broad administrative area only (+1; not a locality match)
a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15)
Show complete scoring
- possible 41-year parent-child age gap (+10)
- candidate's birth is 61 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1857), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- same broad administrative area only (+1; not a locality match)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
- subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1806–1841) (+6; other parent John Glasgow)
- a candidate spouse matches the first dated son John Glasgow, the expected father position (+3; John in 278 profiles)
Deductions and cautions: a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15)
Possible Mother
Rachel Dunlop GlasgowGlasgow-3311
- plausible 20-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 40 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1857), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- weak broad-area overlap: ayrshire (+1; not a locality match)
a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15)
Show complete scoring
- plausible 20-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 40 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1857), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- weak broad-area overlap: ayrshire (+1; not a locality match)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
Deductions and cautions: a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15)
Possible Mother
Jean GlasgowGlasgow-3396
- plausible 30-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 50 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1857), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- same broad administrative area only (+1; not a locality match)
a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15)
Show complete scoring
- plausible 30-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 50 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1857), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- same broad administrative area only (+1; not a locality match)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
Deductions and cautions: a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15)
How parent leads are calculated
Automated leads use birth surnames—not married surnames—as parental eligibility, role-specific biological age limits, bounded and approximate-date uncertainty, household chronology, specific time-aware localities, mapped distance, tenancy succession, migration destinations and sex-aware Scottish naming positions across generations. People already attached as the subject's parents stay in the identity summary and are excluded from this alternative-candidate list, regardless of relationship confidence. The main calibration uses clues available on disconnected profiles; existing parent and sibling links are retained as comparison context rather than treated as transferable evidence. Common ordered names and grandparent-to-child echoes receive a small non-zero weight, so a John or James match can support several independent criteria without producing a lead alone. Rare names, repeated bearers and bundles across otherwise distinct branches receive substantially more weight according to catalogue frequency. An exact migration place is weighted by its rarity and repetition across both branches; a shared destination country is worth only one point. Extra weight is added only when at least three independent clue types converge: naming, locality, specific migration, household chronology or collateral networks. Sparse profiles retain a clearly labelled chronology-only fallback instead of disappearing. Countries, states, counties and research clusters do not count as a shared locality, and fallback, broad representative or kin-inferred coordinates are excluded from distance scoring. Shared descendant profiles are removed before branch-name comparison. A candidate already recorded as a parent-in-law is excluded. A confident or independently supported parent is treated as settled; uncertain and unassessed attachments remain open to alternative comparison. A different linked parent, an uncle/aunt or grandparent path, and a matching existing child profile prevent an alternative from being classified as a strong direct-parent lead until the underlying tree conflict or duplicate is resolved. Familiar forms such as Bessie are normalised. Surname remains an eligibility filter worth zero points.
Naming customs, shared farms and occupations are circumstantial. Children, spouses and collateral relatives may be missing, and tree-derived family networks are not independent evidence. Scores rank research leads; they do not prove parentage.
Same-name candidate
Robert GlasgowGlasgow-2722
- same first and last name (+18)
- birth years within 2 (+25)
- same parent name without a shared profile ID: John Glasgow (+2)
unassessed father attachments differ (−5)
Full comparison detail
- same first and last name (+18)
- birth years within 2 (+25)
- same parent name without a shared profile ID: John Glasgow (+2)
Conflicts: unassessed father attachments differ (−5)
Same-name candidate
Robert Newton GlasgowGlasgow-3738
- same first and last name (+18)
- birth years within 2 (+25)
unassessed father attachments differ (−5)
Full comparison detail
- same first and last name (+18)
- birth years within 2 (+25)
Conflicts: unassessed father attachments differ (−5)
How duplicate leads are calculated
Dates are eligibility gates, not merely deductions: chronologically impossible people are excluded. Dates, places, spouses, parent certainty and children's profiles and names are then compared. A high score is a prompt to inspect records, not a merge recommendation.
Open only what you need
Research & records
Life and record timelineChronological mapped occurrences and their underlying sources.1 record
Profile-stated birthplace: Ayrshire, Scotland, United Kingdom
Ayrshire — exact locality unproved
One-Tree export profile fields are search leads, not sources; relationships are shown only where the export supplies parent links.
Source and mapping detail
WikiTree profile export for Glasgow-3464
No sufficiently specific citation match found.
Precision: County-level representative point
Evidence assessmentWhat is supported, uncertain or disputed in the current case model.7 claims
Documented or strongly supported
No claims in this category have been formally assessed.
Working hypotheses and conflicts
No claims in this category have been formally assessed.
Research questionsOpen problems, missing bridges and the next records to inspect.0 open
No formal open question is recorded for this person.
Sources and provenanceStructured citations and source-quality classifications.1 source
Source or provenance: quality describes the record layer, not every conclusion drawn from it.
- tree_only WikiTree profile export for Glasgow-3464
Technical profile and raw captureDataset metadata, machine dossier and captured WikiTree biography.Advanced
WikiTree profile information
Glasgow-3464
Robert Glasgow
Updated 2025-04-24
Dataset: ONT_Glasco_2026-08-18T16_05.json · generated 2026-08-20
WikiTree biography, citations and relationship snapshot
Glasgow-3464 was captured 2026-08-07T09:54:35+00:00; WikiTree profile revision 2025-04-24.
Profile location claims
| Event | Date | Location | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| birth | — | Ayrshire, Scotland, United Kingdom | WikiTree profile field |
Immediate relationship snapshot
| Relationship | Person | WikiTree ID | Dates and places returned |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parents | John Glasgow | Glasgow-3463 | 1808-00-00 · Ayrshire, Scotland, United Kingdom · 0000-00-00 |
| Parents | Mary Glasgow | Boyd-24519 | 1811-00-00 · 0000-00-00 |
| Children | John Glasgow | Glasgow-3465 | 1857-00-00 · Ayrshire, Scotland, United Kingdom · 0000-00-00 |
| Siblings | William Glasgow | Glasgow-3466 | 1831-00-00 · Ayrshire, Scotland, United Kingdom · 0000-00-00 |
| Siblings | John Glasgow | Glasgow-3467 | 1834-00-00 · Ayrshire, Scotland, United Kingdom · 0000-00-00 |
| Siblings | James Glasgow | Glasgow-3462 | 1843-00-00 · Beith, Ayrshire, Scotland · 0000-00-00 |
Record-bearing passages
Biography Robert was born in 1837. He is the son of John Glasgow and Mary Unknown. Sources
- Source: 1861 Scotland Census MyHeritage.com [online database], MyHeritage Ltd. https://www.myheritage.com/research/collection-10978/1861-scotland-census
- Record: https://www.myheritage.com/research/record-10978-275282/james-glasgow-in-1861-scotland-census James Glasgow in household of John Glasgow
- Citation: James Glasgow Birth: Circa 1843 - Beith, Ayrshire, Scotland Residence: Apr 7 1861 - Gateside, Beith (Ayr), Ayrshire, Scotland Parents: John Glasgow, Mary Glasgow Brother: Robert Glasgow
Profile source citations
No structured source citation was recoverable from the profile biography.
Other external links in the profile
- https://www.myheritage.com/research/collection-10978/1861-scotland-census
- https://www.myheritage.com/research/record-10978-275282/james-glasgow-in-1861-scotland-census
Full captured biography text
Biography Robert was born in 1837. He is the son of John Glasgow and Mary Unknown. Sources * Source: 1861 Scotland Census MyHeritage.com [online database], MyHeritage Ltd. https://www.myheritage.com/research/collection-10978/1861-scotland-census Record: https://www.myheritage.com/research/record-10978-275282/james-glasgow-in-1861-scotland-census James Glasgow in household of John Glasgow Citation: James Glasgow Birth: Circa 1843 - Beith, Ayrshire, Scotland Residence: Apr 7 1861 - Gateside, Beith (Ayr), Ayrshire, Scotland Parents: John Glasgow, Mary Glasgow Brother: Robert Glasgow
Raw WikiTree biography markup
== Biography == Robert was born in 1837. He is the son of [[Glasgow-3463|John Glasgow]] and [[Unknown-719723|Mary Unknown]]. == Sources == <references /> * Source: 1861 Scotland Census MyHeritage.com [online database], MyHeritage Ltd. https://www.myheritage.com/research/collection-10978/1861-scotland-census Record: https://www.myheritage.com/research/record-10978-275282/james-glasgow-in-1861-scotland-census James Glasgow in household of John Glasgow Citation: James Glasgow Birth: Circa 1843 - Beith, Ayrshire, Scotland Residence: Apr 7 1861 - Gateside, Beith (Ayr), Ayrshire, Scotland Parents: John Glasgow, Mary Glasgow Brother: Robert Glasgow