Individual research record
James Glasgow
c. 1840 – ?
Glasgow-3673 · 1 mapped association
At a glance
Identity & family
Tree links organise the family; documentary status still varies.
- Birth
- c. 1840 · Virginia, United States
- Death
- Not recorded · Place not recorded
- Parents
- Not recorded
- Spouses
- Ellen (Page) Glasgow
- Children
- Anna GlasgowEliza E GlasgowJames H Glasgow
- Gender
- Male
- WikiTree
- Glasgow-3673
- Research clusters
- Worldwide One-Tree profile leads
- Mapped descendants
- 3
Comparison context
These child positions and checks are the subject details used to rank possible parents below.
Naming sequence used by the parentage model
Known-position checks: 0 support · 0 conflict. Ordinals retain unnamed children and recognise reused names.
Relationship comparison
Potential parents or duplicates
Compare scored leads with the subject details above—not proof.
Possible fathers5 leads
Possible Father
Joseph Montgomery GlasgowGlasgow-1829
- plausible 33-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- known spouse Margaret Elizabeth (Black) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (31) at the subject's birth (+7)
- candidate's birth is 61 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1868), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)
Show complete scoring
- plausible 33-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 61 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1868), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
- subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1830–1849) (+6; other parent Margaret Elizabeth (Black) Glasgow)
- known spouse Margaret Elizabeth (Black) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (31) at the subject's birth (+7)
- uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Anna +10 (23 public profiles; subject branch: Anna Glasgow; candidate branch: Anna Mary Small (Glasgow) Wilson, Anna Elizabeth Glasgow; +2 repetition bonus); Eliza +8 (23 public profiles; subject branch: Eliza E Glasgow; candidate branch: Eliza Grace Glasgow) (+22 total including +4 multi-name bonus)
Deductions and cautions: same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)
Possible Father
James M GlasgowGlasgow-193
- plausible 41-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- known spouse Sarah (Lyle) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (38) at the subject's birth (+7)
- candidate's birth is 69 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1868), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
candidate already has another child named James W Glasgow (Glasgow-2183) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict); descendant-name recurrence has no independent household, record, migration or specific-locality anchor (score capped at 39)
Show complete scoring
- plausible 41-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 69 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1868), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- weak broad-area overlap: virginia (+1; not a locality match)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
- a known child was born within 2 years of the subject (+3)
- known spouse Sarah (Lyle) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (38) at the subject's birth (+7)
- candidate and subject share the given name James (+4; weak direct parent-child name recurrence, 224 public profiles)
- candidate's name matches the first dated son James H Glasgow, the expected father position for a male subject (+4; catalogue rarity 0, James in 224 profiles)
- uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Eliza +8 (23 public profiles; subject branch: Eliza E Glasgow; candidate branch: Eliza Jane (Glasgow) McNeil) (+8 total)
Deductions and cautions: candidate already has another child named James W Glasgow (Glasgow-2183) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict); descendant-name recurrence has no independent household, record, migration or specific-locality anchor (score capped at 39)
Show 3 lower-scoring possible fathers
Possible Father
Daniel GlasgowGlasgow-3896
- plausible 44-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 72 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1868), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- known spouse Margaret (Irwin) Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (33) at the subject's birth (+3)
locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction); candidate already has another child named James Irvine Glasgow (Glasgow-3898) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict); descendant-name recurrence has no independent household, record, migration or specific-locality anchor (score capped at 39)
Show complete scoring
- plausible 44-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 72 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1868), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- a known child was born within 6 years of the subject (+1)
- known spouse Margaret (Irwin) Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (33) at the subject's birth (+3)
- candidate's sibling and niece/nephew network repeats names in the subject's descendant line (three rarest at most): Eliza +10 (23 public profiles; niece/nephew Eliza (Glasgow) Haigh, niece/nephew Eliza Glasgow; +2 repetition bonus); Anna +8 (23 public profiles; niece/nephew Anna Glasgow) (+18 total)
Deductions and cautions: locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction); candidate already has another child named James Irvine Glasgow (Glasgow-3898) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict); descendant-name recurrence has no independent household, record, migration or specific-locality anchor (score capped at 39)
Possible Father
John M GlasgowGlasgow-1965
- plausible 44-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- known spouse Elizabeth (Kirkpatrick) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (44) at the subject's birth (+7)
- candidate's birth is 72 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1868), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
descendant-name recurrence has no independent household, record, migration or specific-locality anchor (score capped at 39)
Show complete scoring
- plausible 44-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 72 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1868), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- weak broad-area overlap: virginia (+1; not a locality match)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
- a known child was born within 2 years of the subject (+3)
- known spouse Elizabeth (Kirkpatrick) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (44) at the subject's birth (+7)
- candidate's sibling and niece/nephew network repeats names in the subject's descendant line (three rarest at most): Eliza +8 (23 public profiles; niece/nephew Eliza Jane (Glasgow) McNeil) (+8 total)
Deductions and cautions: descendant-name recurrence has no independent household, record, migration or specific-locality anchor (score capped at 39)
Possible Father
James J GlasgowGlasgow-2738
- plausible 30-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- known spouse Mary Caroline (Thompson) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (27) at the subject's birth (+7)
- candidate's birth is 58 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1868), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10); candidate already has another child named James K P Glasgow (Glasgow-2741) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict)
Show complete scoring
- plausible 30-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 58 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1868), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- subject's birth fits within the candidate's overall child-bearing span (1839–1856) (+3; children are not tied to one spouse)
- known spouse Mary Caroline (Thompson) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (27) at the subject's birth (+7)
- candidate and subject share the given name James (+4; weak direct parent-child name recurrence, 224 public profiles)
- candidate's name matches the first dated son James H Glasgow, the expected father position for a male subject (+4; catalogue rarity 0, James in 224 profiles)
- uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Eliza +8 (23 public profiles; subject branch: Eliza E Glasgow; candidate branch: Eliza A Glasgow) (+8 total)
Deductions and cautions: same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10); candidate already has another child named James K P Glasgow (Glasgow-2741) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict)
Possible mothers5 leads
Possible Mother
Margaret Elizabeth (Black) GlasgowBlack-18588
- plausible 31-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 59 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1868), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)
Show complete scoring
- plausible 31-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 59 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1868), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
- subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1830–1849) (+6; other parent Joseph Montgomery Glasgow)
- uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Anna +10 (23 public profiles; subject branch: Anna Glasgow; candidate branch: Anna Mary Small (Glasgow) Wilson, Anna Elizabeth Glasgow; +2 repetition bonus); Eliza +8 (23 public profiles; subject branch: Eliza E Glasgow; candidate branch: Eliza Grace Glasgow) (+22 total including +4 multi-name bonus)
Deductions and cautions: same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)
Possible Mother
Rachel Ramsey (Glasgow) GrahamGlasgow-1935
- plausible 37-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 65 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1868), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- weak broad-area overlap: virginia (+1; not a locality match)
No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required
Show complete scoring
- plausible 37-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 65 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1868), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- weak broad-area overlap: virginia (+1; not a locality match)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
- candidate's sibling and niece/nephew network repeats names in the subject's descendant line (three rarest at most): Eliza +8 (23 public profiles; niece/nephew Eliza Jane (Glasgow) Nelson) (+8 total)
Deductions and cautions: No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required
Show 3 lower-scoring possible mothers
Possible Mother
Sarah (Lyle) GlasgowLyle-1916
- plausible 38-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 66 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1868), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- a known child was born within 2 years of the subject (+3)
No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required
Show complete scoring
- plausible 38-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 66 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1868), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- same broad administrative area only (+1; not a locality match)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
- a known child was born within 2 years of the subject (+3)
- a candidate spouse matches the first dated son James H Glasgow, the expected father position (+3; James in 224 profiles)
Deductions and cautions: No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required
Possible Mother
Katherine (Glasgow) McClellandGlasgow-953
- plausible 22-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 50 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1868), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- weak broad-area overlap: virginia (+1; not a locality match)
No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required
Show complete scoring
- plausible 22-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 50 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1868), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- weak broad-area overlap: virginia (+1; not a locality match)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
- a candidate spouse matches the first dated son James H Glasgow, the expected father position (+3; James in 224 profiles)
Deductions and cautions: No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required
Possible Mother
Eliza Jane (Gilmore) GlasgowGilmore-4240
- plausible 32-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 60 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1868), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)
Show complete scoring
- plausible 32-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 60 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1868), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
- subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1825–1843) (+6; other parent Robert Glasgow)
- candidate's name matches the second dated daughter Eliza E Glasgow, the expected mother position for a male subject (+8; catalogue rarity 3, Eliza in 23 profiles)
Deductions and cautions: same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)
How parent leads are calculated
Automated leads use birth surnames—not married surnames—as parental eligibility, role-specific biological age limits, bounded and approximate-date uncertainty, household chronology, specific time-aware localities, mapped distance, tenancy succession, migration destinations and sex-aware Scottish naming positions across generations. People already attached as the subject's parents stay in the identity summary and are excluded from this alternative-candidate list, regardless of relationship confidence. The main calibration uses clues available on disconnected profiles; existing parent and sibling links are retained as comparison context rather than treated as transferable evidence. Common ordered names and grandparent-to-child echoes receive a small non-zero weight, so a John or James match can support several independent criteria without producing a lead alone. Rare names, repeated bearers and bundles across otherwise distinct branches receive substantially more weight according to catalogue frequency. An exact migration place is weighted by its rarity and repetition across both branches; a shared destination country is worth only one point. Extra weight is added only when at least three independent clue types converge: naming, locality, specific migration, household chronology or collateral networks. Sparse profiles retain a clearly labelled chronology-only fallback instead of disappearing. Countries, states, counties and research clusters do not count as a shared locality, and fallback, broad representative or kin-inferred coordinates are excluded from distance scoring. Shared descendant profiles are removed before branch-name comparison. A candidate already recorded as a parent-in-law is excluded. A confident or independently supported parent is treated as settled; uncertain and unassessed attachments remain open to alternative comparison. A different linked parent, an uncle/aunt or grandparent path, and a matching existing child profile prevent an alternative from being classified as a strong direct-parent lead until the underlying tree conflict or duplicate is resolved. Familiar forms such as Bessie are normalised. Surname remains an eligibility filter worth zero points.
Naming customs, shared farms and occupations are circumstantial. Children, spouses and collateral relatives may be missing, and tree-derived family networks are not independent evidence. Scores rank research leads; they do not prove parentage.
Same-name candidate
James D GlasgowGlasgow-69
- same first and last name (+18)
- birth years within 3 (+18)
- shared recorded place (+20)
No indexed conflict
Full comparison detail
- same first and last name (+18)
- birth years within 3 (+18)
- shared recorded place (+20)
Conflicts: No indexed conflict
Same-name candidate
James McCullough GlasgowGlasgow-3619
- same first and last name (+18)
- same birth year (+30)
No indexed conflict
Full comparison detail
- same first and last name (+18)
- same birth year (+30)
Conflicts: No indexed conflict
How duplicate leads are calculated
Dates are eligibility gates, not merely deductions: chronologically impossible people are excluded. Dates, places, spouses, parent certainty and children's profiles and names are then compared. A high score is a prompt to inspect records, not a merge recommendation.
Open only what you need
Research & records
Life and record timelineChronological mapped occurrences and their underlying sources.1 record
Profile-stated birthplace: Virginia, United States
One-Tree export profile fields are search leads, not sources; relationships are shown only where the export supplies parent links.
Source and mapping detail
WikiTree profile export for Glasgow-3673
No sufficiently specific citation match found.
Precision: Country-centre fallback for profile locality
Evidence assessmentWhat is supported, uncertain or disputed in the current case model.5 claims
Documented or strongly supported
No claims in this category have been formally assessed.
Working hypotheses and conflicts
No claims in this category have been formally assessed.
Research questionsOpen problems, missing bridges and the next records to inspect.0 open
No formal open question is recorded for this person.
Sources and provenanceStructured citations and source-quality classifications.4 sources
Source or provenance: quality describes the record layer, not every conclusion drawn from it.
- original Marriage: "Virginia, U.S., Select Marriages, 1785-1940" Original data: Virginia, Marriages, 1785-1940. Salt Lake City, Utah: FamilySearch, 2013; FHL Film Number: 33674 (accessed 10 September 2025) James Glasgow (25), son of George Glasgow & Lilla Glasgow, marriage to Ellen Page on 19 Mar 1868 in Rappahannock County, Virginia.
- unknown 1870 Census: "1870 United States Federal Census" Year: 1870; Census Place: Marksville, Page, Virginia; Roll: M593_1670; Page: 378A - (accessed 10 September 2025) James Glassgow (27), Farm Laborer, in Marksville, Page, Virginia. Born in Virginia.
- unknown 1880 Census: "1880 United States Federal Census" Year: 1880; Census Place: Newport, Newport, Rhode Island; Roll: 1210; Page: 141c; Enumeration District: 091 - (accessed 10 September 2025) James Glasgow (40), married, Farm laborer, head of household in Newport, Newport, Rhode Island, USA. Born in Virginia.
- tree_only WikiTree profile export for Glasgow-3673
Technical profile and raw captureDataset metadata, machine dossier and captured WikiTree biography.Advanced
WikiTree profile information
Glasgow-3673
James Glasgow
Updated 2025-09-10
Dataset: ONT_Glasco_2026-08-18T16_05.json · generated 2026-08-20
WikiTree biography, citations and relationship snapshot
Glasgow-3673 was captured 2026-08-07T09:54:35+00:00; WikiTree profile revision 2025-09-10.
Profile location claims
| Event | Date | Location | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| birth | — | Virginia, United States | WikiTree profile field |
Immediate relationship snapshot
| Relationship | Person | WikiTree ID | Dates and places returned |
|---|---|---|---|
| Children | Anna Glasgow | Glasgow-3674 | 1868-00-00 · Virginia, United States · 0000-00-00 |
| Children | Eliza E Glasgow | Glasgow-3675 | 1870-00-00 · Virginia, United States · 1900-00-00 · Rhode Island, United States |
| Children | James H Glasgow | Glasgow-3676 | 1874-00-00 · Virginia, United States · 0000-00-00 |
| Spouses | Ellen Glasgow | Page-21056 | 1842-00-00 · Rappahannock, Virginia, United States · 0000-00-00 |
Record-bearing passages
- Biography James was born about 1840 in Virginia. He was the son of George and Lilla Glasgow.
- James (age 25), son of George Glasgow and Lilla Glasgow, married Ellen Page on 19 March 1868 in Rappahannock County, Virginia. Marriage: "Virginia, U.S., Select Marriages, 1785-1940" Original data: Virginia, Marriages, 1785-1940. Salt Lake City, Utah: FamilySearch, 2013; FHL Film Number: 33674 (accessed 10 September 2025) James Glasgow (25), son of George Glasgow & Lilla Glasgow, marriage to Ellen Page on 19 Mar 1868 in Rappahannock County, Virginia.
- In the 1870 census James (age 27), Farm Laborer, was in Marksville, Page, Virginia. He was living with wife Ellen and two children. 1870 Census: "1870 United States Federal Census" Year: 1870; Census Place: Marksville, Page, Virginia; Roll: M593_1670; Page: 378A - (accessed 10 September 2025) James Glassgow (27), Farm Laborer, in Marksville, Page, Virginia. Born in Virginia.
- In the 1880 census James (age 40), Farm laborer, was the married head of household in Newport, Newport, Rhode Island. He was living with wife Ellen and 3 children. 1880 Census: "1880 United States Federal Census" Year: 1880; Census Place: Newport, Newport, Rhode Island; Roll: 1210; Page: 141c; Enumeration District: 091 - (accessed 10 September 2025) James Glasgow (40), married, Farm laborer, head of household in Newport, Newport, Rhode Island, USA. Born in Virginia. Sources
Profile source citations
- Marriage: "Virginia, U.S., Select Marriages, 1785-1940" Original data: Virginia, Marriages, 1785-1940. Salt Lake City, Utah: FamilySearch, 2013; FHL Film Number: 33674 (accessed 10 September 2025) James Glasgow (25), son of George Glasgow & Lilla Glasgow, marriage to Ellen Page on 19 Mar 1868 in Rappahannock County, Virginia.
- 1870 Census: "1870 United States Federal Census" Year: 1870; Census Place: Marksville, Page, Virginia; Roll: M593_1670; Page: 378A - (accessed 10 September 2025) James Glassgow (27), Farm Laborer, in Marksville, Page, Virginia. Born in Virginia.
- 1880 Census: "1880 United States Federal Census" Year: 1880; Census Place: Newport, Newport, Rhode Island; Roll: 1210; Page: 141c; Enumeration District: 091 - (accessed 10 September 2025) James Glasgow (40), married, Farm laborer, head of household in Newport, Newport, Rhode Island, USA. Born in Virginia.
Full captured biography text
Biography James was born about 1840 in Virginia. He was the son of George and Lilla Glasgow. James (age 25), son of George Glasgow and Lilla Glasgow, married Ellen Page on 19 March 1868 in Rappahannock County, Virginia. Marriage: "Virginia, U.S., Select Marriages, 1785-1940" Original data: Virginia, Marriages, 1785-1940. Salt Lake City, Utah: FamilySearch, 2013; FHL Film Number: 33674 (accessed 10 September 2025) James Glasgow (25), son of George Glasgow & Lilla Glasgow, marriage to Ellen Page on 19 Mar 1868 in Rappahannock County, Virginia. In the 1870 census James (age 27), Farm Laborer, was in Marksville, Page, Virginia. He was living with wife Ellen and two children. 1870 Census: "1870 United States Federal Census" Year: 1870; Census Place: Marksville, Page, Virginia; Roll: M593_1670; Page: 378A - (accessed 10 September 2025) James Glassgow (27), Farm Laborer, in Marksville, Page, Virginia. Born in Virginia. In the 1880 census James (age 40), Farm laborer, was the married head of household in Newport, Newport, Rhode Island. He was living with wife Ellen and 3 children. 1880 Census: "1880 United States Federal Census" Year: 1880; Census Place: Newport, Newport, Rhode Island; Roll: 1210; Page: 141c; Enumeration District: 091 - (accessed 10 September 2025) James Glasgow (40), married, Farm laborer, head of household in Newport, Newport, Rhode Island, USA. Born in Virginia. Sources
Raw WikiTree biography markup
== Biography ==
{{African-American Sticker}}
James was born about 1840 in Virginia. He was the son of George and Lilla Glasgow.
James (age 25), son of George Glasgow and Lilla Glasgow, married Ellen Page on 19 March 1868 in Rappahannock County, Virginia.<ref>
'''Marriage''':
"Virginia, U.S., Select Marriages, 1785-1940"<br/>
Original data: Virginia, Marriages, 1785-1940. Salt Lake City, Utah: FamilySearch, 2013; FHL Film Number: 33674<br/>
{{Ancestry Record|60214|2676979}} (accessed 10 September 2025)<br/>
James Glasgow (25), son of George Glasgow & Lilla Glasgow, marriage to Ellen Page on 19 Mar 1868 in Rappahannock County, Virginia.
</ref>
In the 1870 census James (age 27), Farm Laborer, was in Marksville, Page, Virginia. He was living with wife Ellen and two children.<ref>
'''1870 Census''':
"1870 United States Federal Census"<br/>
Year: 1870; Census Place: Marksville, Page, Virginia; Roll: M593_1670; Page: 378A<br/>
{{Ancestry Sharing|44847365|7b22746f6b656e223a22304675652b6c556b6259446c674e736f4d674977636f2f2f66314a4d7834583079586847764d4f326763593d222c22746f6b656e5f76657273696f6e223a225632227d}} - {{Ancestry Record|7163|36991091}} (accessed 10 September 2025)<br/>
James Glassgow (27), Farm Laborer, in Marksville, Page, Virginia. Born in Virginia.
</ref>
In the 1880 census James (age 40), Farm laborer, was the married head of household in Newport, Newport, Rhode Island. He was living with wife Ellen and 3 children.<ref>
'''1880 Census''':
"1880 United States Federal Census"<br/>
Year: 1880; Census Place: Newport, Newport, Rhode Island; Roll: 1210; Page: 141c; Enumeration District: 091<br/>
{{Ancestry Sharing|44847307|7b22746f6b656e223a226359696a7757307a54683450704c732b2f6370356661674149712f5a7573716a6762566a72323978774d773d222c22746f6b656e5f76657273696f6e223a225632227d}} - {{Ancestry Record|6742|24145600}} (accessed 10 September 2025)<br/>
James Glasgow (40), married, Farm laborer, head of household in Newport, Newport, Rhode Island, USA. Born in Virginia.
</ref>
== Sources ==
<references />