Glasgow Surname Project

Individual research record

George Glasgow

1818-06-08 – 1900-04-19

Glasgow-638 · 1 mapped association

Crawford, Lanarkshire, Scotland, United Kingdom→Leicestershire, England, United Kingdom
View on mapOpen WikiTreeCompareReport a correction

At a glance

Identity & family

Tree links organise the family; documentary status still varies.

1Mapped records
4Close relations
5Evidence items
12Candidate leads
Birth
1818-06-08 · Crawford, Lanarkshire, Scotland, United Kingdom
Death
1900-04-19 · Leicestershire, England, United Kingdom
Parents
Not recorded
Spouses
Mary Ann (Norton) Glasgow
Children
Ann Isabella (Glasgow) WilliamsElizabeth Agnes (Glasgow) SwallowMary Janet Glasgow
Gender
Male
WikiTree
Glasgow-638
Research clusters
Scotland One-Tree profile leads
Mapped descendants
3

Comparison context

These child positions and checks are the subject details used to rank possible parents below.

Naming sequence used by the parentage model

Paternal grandfather positionNot identifiable from dated child profiles
Maternal grandfather positionNot identifiable from dated child profiles
Maternal grandmother positionMary Janet Glasgow (1850)
Paternal grandmother positionAnn Isabella (Glasgow) Williams (1854)

Known-position checks: 0 support · 1 conflict. Ordinals retain unnamed children and recognise reused names.

Relationship comparison

Potential parents or duplicates

Compare scored leads with the subject details above—not proof.

Higher-signal leadReview carefullyWeak lead

Possible fathers5 leads

Automated fit28/100
Weak Lead
Dates1777–1857Generation41 years age gapRecorded placesNewton, Lanarkshire, Scotland, United Kingdom · Lanarkshire — exact locality unprovedIndependent clue breadth · 4Age · Broad Geography · Same-Sex Generational Naming · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 41-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 73 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1850), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same broad administrative area only (+1; not a locality match)

No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 41-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 73 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1850), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same broad administrative area only (+1; not a locality match)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • candidate and subject share the given name George (+5; weak direct parent-child name recurrence, 61 public profiles)

Deductions and cautions: No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required

Automated fit27/100
Weak Lead
Dates1792–?Generation26 years age gapRecorded placesMidlothian — exact locality unprovedIndependent clue breadth · 3Age · Same-Sex Generational Naming · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 26-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 58 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1850), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)

locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 26-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 58 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1850), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • candidate and subject share the given name George (+5; weak direct parent-child name recurrence, 61 public profiles)

Deductions and cautions: locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Show 3 lower-scoring possible fathers
Automated fit26/100
Weak Lead
Dates1789–?Generation29 years age gapRecorded placesIreland · Ayrshire, Scotland, United Kingdom · Ireland — exact locality unprovedIndependent clue breadth · 5Age · Household · Sex-Aware Ordered Naming · Spouse · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 29-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • known spouse Ann (Warwick) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (28) at the subject's birth (+7)
  • candidate's birth is 61 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1850), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)

same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 29-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 61 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1850), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • a known child was born within 3 years of the subject (+3)
  • known spouse Ann (Warwick) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (28) at the subject's birth (+7)
  • a candidate spouse matches the second dated daughter Ann Isabella (Glasgow) Williams, the expected mother position (+4; Ann in 41 profiles)

Deductions and cautions: same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Automated fit16/100
Weak Lead
Dates1774–1817Generation44 years age gapRecorded placesKilbirnie, Ayrshire, Scotland · Kilbirnie, Ayrshire, Scotland, United Kingdom · Kilbirnie — AyrshireIndependent clue breadth · 3Age · Sex-Aware Ordered Naming · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 44-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 76 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1850), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)

same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 44-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 76 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1850), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • a candidate spouse matches the second dated daughter Ann Isabella (Glasgow) Williams, the expected mother position (+4; Ann in 41 profiles)

Deductions and cautions: same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Automated fit14/100
Weak Lead
Dates1804–?Generationnominally 14 years; approximate dates permit about 16–24 years age gapRecorded placesBarony, Lanarkshire, Scotland, United Kingdom · Lanarkshire — exact locality unprovedIndependent clue breadth · 4Age · Broad Geography · Same-Sex Generational Naming · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • the nominal 14-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (16–24 years) (+4)
  • candidate's birth is 46 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1850), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same broad administrative area only (+1; not a locality match)

parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction)

Show complete scoring
  • the nominal 14-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (16–24 years) (+4)
  • candidate's birth is 46 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1850), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same broad administrative area only (+1; not a locality match)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • candidate and subject share the given name George (+5; weak direct parent-child name recurrence, 61 public profiles)

Deductions and cautions: parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction)

Possible mothers5 leads

Automated fit6/100
Weak Lead
Dates1792–1848Generation26 years age gapRecorded placesWake County, North Carolina, United States · Weakley County, Tennessee, United StatesIndependent clue breadth · 7Age · Candidate-Family Tradition · Contemporaneous Household Conflict · Rare Branch-Name Recurrence · Rare Name Bundle · Spouse-Specific Child Window · Two-GenerationSame-spouse child windowIsaac Wesley (Glascow) GlasgowCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 26-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 58 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1850), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1813–1831) (+6; other parent Isaac Wesley (Glascow) Glasgow)

candidate is recorded only outside the subject's birth country (−25); candidate's household recorded John Green Glasgow in Currituck, Currituck, North Carolina, United States within 1 years of the subject (−12; no contemporaneous child is indexed in the subject's locality)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 26-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 58 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1850), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1813–1831) (+6; other parent Isaac Wesley (Glascow) Glasgow)
  • uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: George +5 (61 public profiles; subject branch: George Glasgow; candidate branch: George Houston Glasgow, George Irvin Glasgow; +2 repetition bonus); Ann +3 (41 public profiles; subject branch: Ann Isabella (Glasgow) Williams; candidate branch: Ann Catherine (Glasgow) Peery) (+12 total including +4 multi-name bonus)
  • the candidate's own child family has 2 known-position naming matches (+3; branch-level validation)

Deductions and cautions: candidate is recorded only outside the subject's birth country (−25); candidate's household recorded John Green Glasgow in Currituck, Currituck, North Carolina, United States within 1 years of the subject (−12; no contemporaneous child is indexed in the subject's locality)

Automated fit5/100
Weak Lead
Dates1790–?Generation28 years age gapRecorded placesIreland · County Antrim — exact locality unprovedIndependent clue breadth · 5Age · Household · Sex-Aware Ordered Naming · Tradition Validation · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 28-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 60 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1850), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • a known child was born within 3 years of the subject (+3)

candidate is recorded only outside the subject's birth country (−25)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 28-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 60 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1850), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • a known child was born within 3 years of the subject (+3)
  • candidate's name matches the second dated daughter Ann Isabella (Glasgow) Williams, the expected mother position for a male subject (+5; catalogue rarity 1, Ann in 41 profiles)
  • family naming controls: 0 supporting and 1 conflicting known positions (already reflected in naming weight)

Deductions and cautions: candidate is recorded only outside the subject's birth country (−25)

Show 3 lower-scoring possible mothers
Automated fit0/100
Weak Lead
Dates1803–1887Generation15 years age gapRecorded placesReading, Berks, Pennsylvania, United States · Antis, Blair, Pennsylvania, United StatesIndependent clue breadth · 4Age · Sex-Aware Ordered Naming · Tradition Validation · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • possible 15-year parent-child age gap (+10)
  • candidate's birth is 47 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1850), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • candidate's name matches the second dated daughter Ann Isabella (Glasgow) Williams, the expected mother position for a male subject (+5; catalogue rarity 1, Ann in 41 profiles)

candidate is recorded only outside the subject's birth country (−25)

Show complete scoring
  • possible 15-year parent-child age gap (+10)
  • candidate's birth is 47 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1850), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • candidate's name matches the second dated daughter Ann Isabella (Glasgow) Williams, the expected mother position for a male subject (+5; catalogue rarity 1, Ann in 41 profiles)
  • family naming controls: 0 supporting and 1 conflicting known positions (already reflected in naming weight)

Deductions and cautions: candidate is recorded only outside the subject's birth country (−25)

Automated fit0/100
Weak Lead
Dates1803–?Generation15 years age gapRecorded placesUpper CanadaIndependent clue breadth · 4Age · Sex-Aware Ordered Naming · Tradition Validation · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • possible 15-year parent-child age gap (+10)
  • candidate's birth is 47 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1850), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • candidate's name matches the second dated daughter Ann Isabella (Glasgow) Williams, the expected mother position for a male subject (+5; catalogue rarity 1, Ann in 41 profiles)

candidate is recorded only outside the subject's birth country (−25)

Show complete scoring
  • possible 15-year parent-child age gap (+10)
  • candidate's birth is 47 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1850), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • candidate's name matches the second dated daughter Ann Isabella (Glasgow) Williams, the expected mother position for a male subject (+5; catalogue rarity 1, Ann in 41 profiles)
  • family naming controls: 0 supporting and 1 conflicting known positions (already reflected in naming weight)

Deductions and cautions: candidate is recorded only outside the subject's birth country (−25)

Automated fit0/100
Weak Lead
Dates1795–1847Generation23 years age gapRecorded placesCookstown, County Tyrone, Ireland · Gortin, Derryloran, Cookstown, County Tyrone, Ireland · CookstownIndependent clue breadth · 6Age · Contemporaneous Household Conflict · Sex-Aware Ordered Naming · Spouse-Specific Child Window · Tradition Validation · Two-GenerationSame-spouse child windowSamuel GlasgowCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 23-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 55 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1850), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1815–1837) (+6; other parent Samuel Glasgow)

candidate is recorded only outside the subject's birth country (−25); candidate's household recorded John Glasgow in Gortin, Derryloran, Cookstown, County Tyrone, Ireland, United Kingdom within 3 years of the subject (−12; no contemporaneous child is indexed in the subject's locality)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 23-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 55 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1850), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1815–1837) (+6; other parent Samuel Glasgow)
  • candidate's name matches the second dated daughter Ann Isabella (Glasgow) Williams, the expected mother position for a male subject (+5; catalogue rarity 1, Ann in 41 profiles)
  • family naming controls: 0 supporting and 1 conflicting known positions (already reflected in naming weight)

Deductions and cautions: candidate is recorded only outside the subject's birth country (−25); candidate's household recorded John Glasgow in Gortin, Derryloran, Cookstown, County Tyrone, Ireland, United Kingdom within 3 years of the subject (−12; no contemporaneous child is indexed in the subject's locality)

How parent leads are calculated

Automated leads use birth surnames—not married surnames—as parental eligibility, role-specific biological age limits, bounded and approximate-date uncertainty, household chronology, specific time-aware localities, mapped distance, tenancy succession, migration destinations and sex-aware Scottish naming positions across generations. People already attached as the subject's parents stay in the identity summary and are excluded from this alternative-candidate list, regardless of relationship confidence. The main calibration uses clues available on disconnected profiles; existing parent and sibling links are retained as comparison context rather than treated as transferable evidence. Common ordered names and grandparent-to-child echoes receive a small non-zero weight, so a John or James match can support several independent criteria without producing a lead alone. Rare names, repeated bearers and bundles across otherwise distinct branches receive substantially more weight according to catalogue frequency. An exact migration place is weighted by its rarity and repetition across both branches; a shared destination country is worth only one point. Extra weight is added only when at least three independent clue types converge: naming, locality, specific migration, household chronology or collateral networks. Sparse profiles retain a clearly labelled chronology-only fallback instead of disappearing. Countries, states, counties and research clusters do not count as a shared locality, and fallback, broad representative or kin-inferred coordinates are excluded from distance scoring. Shared descendant profiles are removed before branch-name comparison. A candidate already recorded as a parent-in-law is excluded. A confident or independently supported parent is treated as settled; uncertain and unassessed attachments remain open to alternative comparison. A different linked parent, an uncle/aunt or grandparent path, and a matching existing child profile prevent an alternative from being classified as a strong direct-parent lead until the underlying tree conflict or duplicate is resolved. Familiar forms such as Bessie are normalised. Surname remains an eligibility filter worth zero points.

Naming customs, shared farms and occupations are circumstantial. Children, spouses and collateral relatives may be missing, and tree-derived family networks are not independent evidence. Scores rank research leads; they do not prove parentage.

Same-name candidate

George GlasgowGlasgow-1536

Automated fit40/100
Similar Person
Dates1804–?PlacesBarony, Lanarkshire, Scotland, United KingdomParent comparisonNo shared parent is indexed
Why it may fit
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 14 (+2)
  • shared recorded place (+20)

No indexed conflict

Full comparison detail
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 14 (+2)
  • shared recorded place (+20)

Conflicts: No indexed conflict

Open side-by-side comparison

Same-name candidate

George GlasgowGlasgow-1529

Automated fit38/100
Similar Person
Dates1769–?PlacesWandell and Lamington, Lanarkshire, ScotlandParent comparisonNo shared parent is indexed
Why it may fit
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • shared recorded place (+20)

record-derived birth estimates differ by 49; retained without deduction

Full comparison detail
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • shared recorded place (+20)

Conflicts: record-derived birth estimates differ by 49; retained without deduction

Open side-by-side comparison
How duplicate leads are calculated

Dates are eligibility gates, not merely deductions: chronologically impossible people are excluded. Dates, places, spouses, parent certainty and children's profiles and names are then compared. A high score is a prompt to inspect records, not a merge recommendation.

Open only what you need

Research & records

Life and record timelineChronological mapped occurrences and their underlying sources.1 record
b. 1818

Profile-stated birthplace: Crawford, Lanarkshire, Scotland

Lanarkshire — exact locality unproved

One-Tree export profile fields are search leads, not sources; relationships are shown only where the export supplies parent links.

One-Tree profile leadderivative
Source and mapping detail

WikiTree profile export for Glasgow-638

Candidate matched on record type, year; inspect before treating it as the underlying record.

Precision: County-level representative point

Evidence assessmentWhat is supported, uncertain or disputed in the current case model.5 claims
3Derivative
1Tree Only
1Unknown

Documented or strongly supported

No claims in this category have been formally assessed.

Working hypotheses and conflicts

No claims in this category have been formally assessed.

Research questionsOpen problems, missing bridges and the next records to inspect.0 open

No formal open question is recorded for this person.

Sources and provenanceStructured citations and source-quality classifications.5 sources

Source or provenance: quality describes the record layer, not every conclusion drawn from it.

  1. derivative "Scotland, Select Births and Baptisms, 1564-1950"; Ancestry.com [database on-line]; George Glasgow, b. 8 Jun 1818, bap. 14 Jun 1818 at Crawford, Lanark; f=William Glasgow m=Janet Thomson.
  2. derivative "England & Wales, National Probate Calendar (Index of Wills and Administrations), 1858-1966, 1973-1995"; Ancestry.com [database on-line]; George Glasgow, d. 19 Apr 1900 at Leicester, England.
  3. unknown Find a Grave memorial #171317717 (http://www.findagrave.com/cgi-bin/fg.cgi?page=gr&GRid=171317717&ref=acom), George Glasgow, b. 8 Jun 1818 at Scotland, d. 19 Apr 1900.
  4. derivative "1891 England Census"; Ancestry.com [database on-line]; Class: RG12; Piece: 2525; Folio: 115; Page: 6; GSU roll: 6097635; George Glasgow, widow, age 72, born in Scotland; residing with daughters Janet (40) and Amie Williams (36), and grandchildren John Williams (16) and George Williams (10).
  5. tree_only WikiTree profile export for Glasgow-638
Technical profile and raw captureDataset metadata, machine dossier and captured WikiTree biography.Advanced

WikiTree profile information

Dataset: ONT_Glasco_2026-08-18T16_05.json · generated 2026-08-20

Machine-readable dossier

WikiTree biography, citations and relationship snapshot

Glasgow-638 was captured 2026-08-07T09:54:35+00:00; WikiTree profile revision 2023-08-11.

Profile location claims

EventDateLocationStatus
birth—Crawford, Lanarkshire, ScotlandWikiTree profile field
death—Leicestershire, EnglandWikiTree profile field
marriage1843-00-00Leicester, Leicestershire, EnglandWikiTree relationship field

Immediate relationship snapshot

RelationshipPersonWikiTree IDDates and places returned
ChildrenMary Janet GlasgowGlasgow-6391850-00-00 · Leicestershire, England · 1928-12-03
ChildrenAnn Isabella WilliamsGlasgow-6401854-12-24 · Leicestershire, England, United Kingdom · 1926-10-10
ChildrenElizabeth Agnes SwallowGlasgow-6411857-05-28 · Leicestershire, England · 1914-10-03 · Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
SpousesMary Ann GlasgowNorton-50171818-08-12 · Yelvertoft, Northamptonshire, England · 1878-03-14 · Leicestershire, England · 1843-00-00 · Leicester, Leicestershire, England

Profile categories

Crawford, Lanarkshire Crawford,_Lanarkshire Welford Road Cemetery, Leicester, Leicestershire Welford_Road_Cemetery,_Leicester,_Leicestershire

Record-bearing passages

  • Biography George was born in 1818 at Lanarkshire, Scotland to William Glasgow and Janet Thomson. "Scotland, Select Births and Baptisms, 1564-1950"; Ancestry.com [database on-line]; George Glasgow, b. 8 Jun 1818, bap. 14 Jun 1818 at Crawford, Lanark; f=William Glasgow m=Janet Thomson. Sources

    • "England & Wales, National Probate Calendar (Index of Wills and Administrations), 1858-1966, 1973-1995"; Ancestry.com [database on-line]; George Glasgow, d. 19 Apr 1900 at Leicester, England.
  • Find a Grave memorial #171317717 (http://www.findagrave.com/cgi-bin/fg.cgi?page=gr&GRid=171317717&ref=acom), George Glasgow, b. 8 Jun 1818 at Scotland, d. 19 Apr 1900.
  • "1891 England Census"; Ancestry.com [database on-line]; Class: RG12; Piece: 2525; Folio: 115; Page: 6; GSU roll: 6097635; George Glasgow, widow, age 72, born in Scotland; residing with daughters Janet (40) and Amie Williams (36), and grandchildren John Williams (16) and George Williams (10).

Profile source citations

  1. "Scotland, Select Births and Baptisms, 1564-1950"; Ancestry.com [database on-line]; George Glasgow, b. 8 Jun 1818, bap. 14 Jun 1818 at Crawford, Lanark; f=William Glasgow m=Janet Thomson.
  2. "England & Wales, National Probate Calendar (Index of Wills and Administrations), 1858-1966, 1973-1995"; Ancestry.com [database on-line]; George Glasgow, d. 19 Apr 1900 at Leicester, England.
  3. Find a Grave memorial #171317717 (http://www.findagrave.com/cgi-bin/fg.cgi?page=gr&GRid=171317717&ref=acom), George Glasgow, b. 8 Jun 1818 at Scotland, d. 19 Apr 1900. source link 1
  4. "1891 England Census"; Ancestry.com [database on-line]; Class: RG12; Piece: 2525; Folio: 115; Page: 6; GSU roll: 6097635; George Glasgow, widow, age 72, born in Scotland; residing with daughters Janet (40) and Amie Williams (36), and grandchildren John Williams (16) and George Williams (10).
Full captured biography text
Biography
George was born in 1818 at Lanarkshire, Scotland to William Glasgow and Janet Thomson. "Scotland, Select Births and Baptisms, 1564-1950"; Ancestry.com [database on-line]; George Glasgow, b. 8 Jun 1818, bap. 14 Jun 1818 at Crawford, Lanark; f=William Glasgow m=Janet Thomson. 
Sources
* "England & Wales, National Probate Calendar (Index of Wills and Administrations), 1858-1966, 1973-1995"; Ancestry.com [database on-line]; George Glasgow, d. 19 Apr 1900 at Leicester, England.

* Find a Grave memorial #171317717 (http://www.findagrave.com/cgi-bin/fg.cgi?page=gr&GRid=171317717&ref=acom), George Glasgow, b. 8 Jun 1818 at Scotland, d. 19 Apr 1900.

* "1891 England Census"; Ancestry.com [database on-line]; Class: RG12; Piece: 2525; Folio: 115; Page: 6; GSU roll: 6097635; George Glasgow, widow, age 72, born in Scotland; residing with daughters Janet (40) and Amie Williams (36), and grandchildren John Williams (16) and George Williams (10).
Raw WikiTree biography markup
[[Category: Welford Road Cemetery, Leicester, Leicestershire]]
{{Scotland Sticker}} [[Category:Crawford, Lanarkshire]]
== Biography ==

George was born in 1818 at Lanarkshire, Scotland to William Glasgow and Janet Thomson.<ref>"Scotland, Select Births and Baptisms, 1564-1950"; Ancestry.com [database on-line]; George Glasgow, b. 8 Jun 1818, bap. 14 Jun 1818 at Crawford, Lanark; f=William Glasgow m=Janet Thomson.</ref>


== Sources ==
<references />
* "England & Wales, National Probate Calendar (Index of Wills and Administrations), 1858-1966, 1973-1995"; Ancestry.com [database on-line]; George Glasgow, d. 19 Apr 1900 at Leicester, England.

* [http://www.findagrave.com/cgi-bin/fg.cgi?page=gr&amp;GRid=171317717&amp;ref=acom Find a Grave memorial #171317717], George Glasgow, b. 8 Jun 1818 at Scotland, d. 19 Apr 1900.

* "1891 England Census"; Ancestry.com [database on-line]; Class: RG12; Piece: 2525; Folio: 115; Page: 6; GSU roll: 6097635; George Glasgow, widow, age 72, born in Scotland; residing with daughters Janet (40) and Amie Williams (36), and grandchildren John Williams (16) and George Williams (10).