Glasgow Surname Project

Individual research record

Andrew Jackson Glasgow

1830 – ?

Glasgow-742 · 1 mapped association

Pennsylvania, United StatesDeath place unknown

At a glance

Identity & family

Tree links organise the family; documentary status still varies.

1Mapped records
9Close relations
6Evidence items
12Candidate leads
Birth
1830 · Pennsylvania, United States
Death
Not recorded · Place not recorded
Parents
Not recorded
Spouses
Martha Spangle
Children
Catharine M. GlasgowGeorge W. GlasgowHenry GlasgowHester GlasgowIda C GlasgowJohn A. GlasgowMartha March GlasgowSamuel Glasgow
Gender
Male
WikiTree
Glasgow-742
Research clusters
Worldwide One-Tree profile leads
Mapped descendants
8

Comparison context

These child positions and checks are the subject details used to rank possible parents below.

Naming sequence used by the parentage model

Paternal grandfather positionSamuel Glasgow (1859)
Maternal grandfather positionGeorge W. Glasgow (1861)
Maternal grandmother positionHester Glasgow (1867)
Paternal grandmother positionIda C Glasgow (1868)

Known-position checks: 0 support · 1 conflict. Ordinals retain unnamed children and recognise reused names.

Relationship comparison

Potential parents or duplicates

Compare scored leads with the subject details above—not proof.

Higher-signal leadReview carefullyWeak lead

Possible fathers5 leads

Automated fit41/100
Moderate Lead
Dates1786–1848Generation44 years age gapRecorded placesCurrituck, North Carolina, United States · Dresden, Weakley, Tennessee, United StatesIndependent clue breadth · 6Age · Rare Branch-Name Recurrence · Rare Name Bundle · Spouse · Spouse-Specific Child Window · Two-GenerationSame-spouse child windowDosha (Cannady) GlasgowCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 44-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • known spouse Dosha (Cannady) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (38) at the subject's birth (+7)
  • candidate's birth is 73 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1859), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)

same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 44-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 73 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1859), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1813–1831) (+6; other parent Dosha (Cannady) Glasgow)
  • known spouse Dosha (Cannady) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (38) at the subject's birth (+7)
  • uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Martha +7 (45 public profiles; subject branch: Martha March Glasgow; candidate branch: Martha P Glasgow, Martha Glasgow; +4 repetition bonus); George +5 (61 public profiles; subject branch: George W. Glasgow; candidate branch: George Houston Glasgow, George Irvin Glasgow; +2 repetition bonus) (+16 total including +4 multi-name bonus)

Deductions and cautions: same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Automated fit39/100
Weak Lead
Dates1797–?Generation33 years age gapRecorded placesPennsylvania, United States · Chester, Pennsylvania, United StatesIndependent clue breadth · 6Age · Broad Geography · Household · Rare Branch-Name Recurrence · Spouse · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 33-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • known spouse Mary (Brom) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (27) at the subject's birth (+7)
  • candidate's birth is 62 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1859), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)

descendant-name recurrence has no independent household, record, migration or specific-locality anchor (score capped at 39)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 33-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 62 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1859), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same broad administrative area only (+1; not a locality match)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • another recorded child shares the subject's birth year (+2; possible twins or date uncertainty)
  • known spouse Mary (Brom) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (27) at the subject's birth (+7)
  • uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Henry +8 (24 public profiles; subject branch: Henry Glasgow; candidate branch: Henry Junior Glasco) (+8 total)

Deductions and cautions: descendant-name recurrence has no independent household, record, migration or specific-locality anchor (score capped at 39)

Show 3 lower-scoring possible fathers
Automated fit36/100
Weak Lead
Dates1804–1876Generation26 years age gapRecorded placesPennsylvania, United States · At SeaIndependent clue breadth · 7Age · Broad Geography · Household · Sex-Aware Ordered Naming · Spouse · Tradition Validation · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 26-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • known spouse Elizabeth Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (26) at the subject's birth (+7)
  • candidate's birth is 55 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1859), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)

No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 26-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 55 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1859), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same broad administrative area only (+1; not a locality match)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • another recorded child shares the subject's birth year (+2; possible twins or date uncertainty)
  • known spouse Elizabeth Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (26) at the subject's birth (+7)
  • candidate's name matches the first dated son Samuel Glasgow, the expected father position for a male subject (+4; catalogue rarity 0, Samuel in 79 profiles)
  • family naming controls: 0 supporting and 1 conflicting known positions (already reflected in naming weight)

Deductions and cautions: No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required

Automated fit35/100
Weak Lead
Dates1807–1886Generation23 years age gapRecorded placesBrush Creek Township, Adams, Ohio, United States · Washington, Washington, Iowa, United StatesIndependent clue breadth · 5Age · Household · Rare Branch-Name Recurrence · Spouse · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 23-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • known spouse Margaret Elizabeth (Black) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (21) at the subject's birth (+7)
  • candidate's birth is 52 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1859), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)

same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 23-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 52 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1859), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • another recorded child shares the subject's birth year (+2; possible twins or date uncertainty)
  • known spouse Margaret Elizabeth (Black) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (21) at the subject's birth (+7)
  • uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Ida +14 (9 public profiles; subject branch: Ida C Glasgow; candidate branch: Ida Mae (Glasgow) Simpson, Ida May (Glasgow) Christenson; +2 repetition bonus) (+14 total)

Deductions and cautions: same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Automated fit35/100
Weak Lead
Dates1789–1831Generation41 years age gapRecorded placesSouth Carolina, United States · South CarolinaIndependent clue breadth · 6Age · Rare Branch-Name Recurrence · Rare Name Bundle · Spouse · Spouse-Specific Child Window · Two-GenerationSame-spouse child windowSarah GlasgowCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 41-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • known spouse Sarah Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (36) at the subject's birth (+7)
  • candidate's birth is 70 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1859), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)

same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 41-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 70 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1859), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1817–1855) (+6; other parent Sarah Glasgow)
  • known spouse Sarah Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (36) at the subject's birth (+7)
  • uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: George +3 (61 public profiles; subject branch: George W. Glasgow; candidate branch: George Cannon Glasgow); Martha +3 (45 public profiles; subject branch: Martha March Glasgow; candidate branch: Martha Amelia Glasgow) (+10 total including +4 multi-name bonus)

Deductions and cautions: same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Possible mothers5 leads

Automated fit37/100
Weak Lead
Dates1792–1848Generation38 years age gapRecorded placesWake County, North Carolina, United States · Weakley County, Tennessee, United StatesIndependent clue breadth · 6Age · Candidate-Family Tradition · Rare Branch-Name Recurrence · Rare Name Bundle · Spouse-Specific Child Window · Two-GenerationSame-spouse child windowIsaac Wesley (Glascow) GlasgowCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 38-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 67 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1859), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)

same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 38-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 67 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1859), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1813–1831) (+6; other parent Isaac Wesley (Glascow) Glasgow)
  • uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Martha +7 (45 public profiles; subject branch: Martha March Glasgow; candidate branch: Martha P Glasgow, Martha Glasgow; +4 repetition bonus); George +5 (61 public profiles; subject branch: George W. Glasgow; candidate branch: George Houston Glasgow, George Irvin Glasgow; +2 repetition bonus) (+16 total including +4 multi-name bonus)
  • the candidate's own child family has 2 known-position naming matches (+3; branch-level validation)

Deductions and cautions: same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Automated fit33/100
Weak Lead
Dates1803–?Generation27 years age gapRecorded placesPennsylvania, United States · Chester, Pennsylvania, United StatesIndependent clue breadth · 5Age · Broad Geography · Household · Rare Branch-Name Recurrence · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 27-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 56 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1859), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same broad administrative area only (+1; not a locality match)

No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 27-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 56 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1859), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same broad administrative area only (+1; not a locality match)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • another recorded child shares the subject's birth year (+2; possible twins or date uncertainty)
  • uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Henry +8 (24 public profiles; subject branch: Henry Glasgow; candidate branch: Henry Junior Glasco) (+8 total)

Deductions and cautions: No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required

Show 3 lower-scoring possible mothers
Automated fit28/100
Weak Lead
Dates1809–1851Generation21 years age gapRecorded placesAdams, Ohio, United StatesIndependent clue breadth · 4Age · Household · Rare Branch-Name Recurrence · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 21-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 50 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1859), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)

same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 21-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 50 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1859), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • another recorded child shares the subject's birth year (+2; possible twins or date uncertainty)
  • uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Ida +14 (9 public profiles; subject branch: Ida C Glasgow; candidate branch: Ida Mae (Glasgow) Simpson, Ida May (Glasgow) Christenson; +2 repetition bonus) (+14 total)

Deductions and cautions: same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Automated fit28/100
Weak Lead
Dates1804–?Generation26 years age gapRecorded placesPennsylvania, United StatesIndependent clue breadth · 5Age · Broad Geography · Household · Sex-Aware Ordered Naming · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 26-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 55 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1859), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same broad administrative area only (+1; not a locality match)

No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 26-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 55 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1859), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same broad administrative area only (+1; not a locality match)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • another recorded child shares the subject's birth year (+2; possible twins or date uncertainty)
  • a candidate spouse matches the first dated son Samuel Glasgow, the expected father position (+3; Samuel in 79 profiles)

Deductions and cautions: No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required

Automated fit28/100
Weak Lead
Dates1794–1847Generation36 years age gapRecorded placesSouth Carolina, United StatesIndependent clue breadth · 5Age · Rare Branch-Name Recurrence · Rare Name Bundle · Spouse-Specific Child Window · Two-GenerationSame-spouse child windowJames GlasgowCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 36-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 65 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1859), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)

same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 36-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 65 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1859), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1817–1855) (+6; other parent James Glasgow)
  • uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: George +3 (61 public profiles; subject branch: George W. Glasgow; candidate branch: George Cannon Glasgow); Martha +3 (45 public profiles; subject branch: Martha March Glasgow; candidate branch: Martha Amelia Glasgow) (+10 total including +4 multi-name bonus)

Deductions and cautions: same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

How parent leads are calculated

Automated leads use birth surnames—not married surnames—as parental eligibility, role-specific biological age limits, bounded and approximate-date uncertainty, household chronology, specific time-aware localities, mapped distance, tenancy succession, migration destinations and sex-aware Scottish naming positions across generations. People already attached as the subject's parents stay in the identity summary and are excluded from this alternative-candidate list, regardless of relationship confidence. The main calibration uses clues available on disconnected profiles; existing parent and sibling links are retained as comparison context rather than treated as transferable evidence. Common ordered names and grandparent-to-child echoes receive a small non-zero weight, so a John or James match can support several independent criteria without producing a lead alone. Rare names, repeated bearers and bundles across otherwise distinct branches receive substantially more weight according to catalogue frequency. An exact migration place is weighted by its rarity and repetition across both branches; a shared destination country is worth only one point. Extra weight is added only when at least three independent clue types converge: naming, locality, specific migration, household chronology or collateral networks. Sparse profiles retain a clearly labelled chronology-only fallback instead of disappearing. Countries, states, counties and research clusters do not count as a shared locality, and fallback, broad representative or kin-inferred coordinates are excluded from distance scoring. Shared descendant profiles are removed before branch-name comparison. A candidate already recorded as a parent-in-law is excluded. A confident or independently supported parent is treated as settled; uncertain and unassessed attachments remain open to alternative comparison. A different linked parent, an uncle/aunt or grandparent path, and a matching existing child profile prevent an alternative from being classified as a strong direct-parent lead until the underlying tree conflict or duplicate is resolved. Familiar forms such as Bessie are normalised. Surname remains an eligibility filter worth zero points.

Naming customs, shared farms and occupations are circumstantial. Children, spouses and collateral relatives may be missing, and tree-derived family networks are not independent evidence. Scores rank research leads; they do not prove parentage.

Automated fit56/100
Similar Person
Dates1834–1902PlacesPennsylvania, United StatesParent comparisonNo shared parent is indexed
Why it may fit
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 4 (+18)
  • shared recorded place (+20)

No indexed conflict

Full comparison detail
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 4 (+18)
  • shared recorded place (+20)

Conflicts: No indexed conflict

Same-name candidate

Andrew GlasgowGlasgow-3495

Automated fit28/100
Similar Person
Dates1814–?PlacesIreland, United Kingdom → Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United StatesParent comparisonNo shared parent is indexed
Why it may fit
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 16 (+2)
  • overlapping locality (+8)

No indexed conflict

Full comparison detail
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 16 (+2)
  • overlapping locality (+8)

Conflicts: No indexed conflict

How duplicate leads are calculated

Dates are eligibility gates, not merely deductions: chronologically impossible people are excluded. Dates, places, spouses, parent certainty and children's profiles and names are then compared. A high score is a prompt to inspect records, not a merge recommendation.

Open only what you need

Research & records

Life and record timelineChronological mapped occurrences and their underlying sources.1 record
b. 1830

Profile-stated birthplace: Pennsylvania

Pennsylvania

One-Tree export profile fields are search leads, not sources; relationships are shown only where the export supplies parent links.

One-Tree profile leadunknown
Source and mapping detail

WikiTree profile export for Glasgow-742

No sufficiently specific citation match found.

Precision: Country-centre fallback for profile locality

Evidence assessmentWhat is supported, uncertain or disputed in the current case model.10 claims
5Unknown
1Tree Only

Documented or strongly supported

No claims in this category have been formally assessed.

Working hypotheses and conflicts

No claims in this category have been formally assessed.

Research questionsOpen problems, missing bridges and the next records to inspect.0 open

No formal open question is recorded for this person.

Next records to inspect

  1. census — Source: #S668051964 Pennsylvania Historic and Museum Commission; Pennsylvania, USA; Certificate Number Range: 023601-026550 Source: #S667239774 Year: 1880; Census Place: Gulich, Clearfield, Pennsylvania; Roll: 1117; Page: 430D; Enumeration District: 277
  2. census — Pennsylvania Source: #S668051964 Pennsylvania Historic and Museum Commission; Pennsylvania, USA; Certificate Number Range: 023601-026550 Source: #S667239774 Year: 1880; Census Place: Gulich, Clearfield, Pennsylvania; Roll: 1117; Page: 430D; Enumeration District: 277
Sources and provenanceStructured citations and source-quality classifications.6 sources

Source or provenance: quality describes the record layer, not every conclusion drawn from it.

  1. unknown Source: #S668051964 Pennsylvania Historic and Museum Commission; Pennsylvania, USA; Certificate Number Range: 023601-026550
  2. unknown Source: #S667239774 Year: 1880; Census Place: Gulich, Clearfield, Pennsylvania; Roll: 1117; Page: 430D; Enumeration District: 277
  3. unknown Source: S667239774 Repository: #R650947738 1880 United States Federal Census Ancestry.com and The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints Publication: Ancestry.com Operations Inc
  4. unknown Repository: R650947738 Ancestry.com
  5. unknown Source: S668051964 Repository: #R650947738 Pennsylvania, Death Certificates, 1906-1964 Ancestry.com Publication: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc.
  6. tree_only WikiTree profile export for Glasgow-742
Technical profile and raw captureDataset metadata, machine dossier and captured WikiTree biography.Advanced

WikiTree profile information

Dataset: ONT_Glasco_2026-08-18T16_05.json · generated 2026-08-20

Machine-readable dossier

WikiTree biography, citations and relationship snapshot

Glasgow-742 was captured 2026-08-07T09:54:35+00:00; WikiTree profile revision 2018-01-21.

Profile location claims

EventDateLocationStatus
birthPennsylvaniaWikiTree profile field

Immediate relationship snapshot

RelationshipPersonWikiTree IDDates and places returned
ChildrenSamuel GlasgowGlasgow-7411859-00-00 · Pennsylvania · 0000-00-00
ChildrenGeorge W. GlasgowGlasgow-7401861-00-00 · Pennsylvania · 0000-00-00
ChildrenHester GlasgowGlasgow-7391867-00-00 · Pennsylvania · 0000-00-00
ChildrenIda C GlasgowGlasgow-7341868-12-20 · Pennsylvania · 1927-03-14 · Glasgow, Cambria County, Pennsylvania, United States of America
ChildrenJohn A. GlasgowGlasgow-7381871-00-00 · Pennsylvania · 0000-00-00
ChildrenCatharine M. GlasgowGlasgow-7371874-00-00 · Pennsylvania · 0000-00-00
ChildrenHenry GlasgowGlasgow-7361877-00-00 · Pennsylvania · 0000-00-00
ChildrenMartha March GlasgowGlasgow-7431882-03-29 · Pennsylvania · 1942-03-19 · Gulich, Clearfield, Pennsylvania, USA
SpousesMarthaSpangle-581843-00-00 · Pennsylvania · 1912-12-30 · Glasgow, Cambria, Pennsylvania, USA · 0000-00-00

Record-bearing passages

  • Biography Andrew Jackson Glasgow. Source: #S668051964 Pennsylvania Historic and Museum Commission; Pennsylvania, USA; Certificate Number Range: 023601-026550 Source: #S667239774 Year: 1880; Census Place: Gulich, Clearfield, Pennsylvania; Roll: 1117; Page: 430D; Enumeration District: 277
  • Born Abt 1830. Pennsylvania Source: #S668051964 Pennsylvania Historic and Museum Commission; Pennsylvania, USA; Certificate Number Range: 023601-026550 Source: #S667239774 Year: 1880; Census Place: Gulich, Clearfield, Pennsylvania; Roll: 1117; Page: 430D; Enumeration District: 277
  • Residence Marital Status: MarriedRelation to Head: Self. 1880 Gulich, Clearfield, Pennsylvania, USA. Source: #S667239774 Year: 1880; Census Place: Gulich, Clearfield, Pennsylvania; Roll: 1117; Page: 430D; Enumeration District: 277 Sources

    • Source: S667239774 Repository: #R650947738 1880 United States Federal Census Ancestry.com and The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints Publication: Ancestry.com Operations Inc
    • Repository: R650947738 Ancestry.com
    • Source: S668051964 Repository: #R650947738 Pennsylvania, Death Certificates, 1906-1964 Ancestry.com Publication: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc.

Profile source citations

  1. Source: #S668051964 Pennsylvania Historic and Museum Commission; Pennsylvania, USA; Certificate Number Range: 023601-026550
  2. Source: #S667239774 Year: 1880; Census Place: Gulich, Clearfield, Pennsylvania; Roll: 1117; Page: 430D; Enumeration District: 277
  3. Source: S667239774 Repository: #R650947738 1880 United States Federal Census Ancestry.com and The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints Publication: Ancestry.com Operations Inc
  4. Repository: R650947738 Ancestry.com
  5. Source: S668051964 Repository: #R650947738 Pennsylvania, Death Certificates, 1906-1964 Ancestry.com Publication: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc.
Full captured biography text
Biography
Andrew Jackson Glasgow. Source: #S668051964 Pennsylvania Historic and Museum Commission; Pennsylvania, USA; Certificate Number Range: 023601-026550 Source: #S667239774 Year: 1880; Census Place: Gulich, Clearfield, Pennsylvania; Roll: 1117; Page: 430D; Enumeration District: 277 

Born 
Abt 1830. 
Pennsylvania Source: #S668051964 Pennsylvania Historic and Museum Commission; Pennsylvania, USA; Certificate Number Range: 023601-026550 Source: #S667239774 Year: 1880; Census Place: Gulich, Clearfield, Pennsylvania; Roll: 1117; Page: 430D; Enumeration District: 277 

Residence Marital Status: MarriedRelation to Head: Self. 
1880
Gulich, Clearfield, Pennsylvania, USA. Source: #S667239774 Year: 1880; Census Place: Gulich, Clearfield, Pennsylvania; Roll: 1117; Page: 430D; Enumeration District: 277 
Sources
* Source: S667239774 Repository: #R650947738 1880 United States Federal Census Ancestry.com and The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints Publication: Ancestry.com Operations Inc 
* Repository: R650947738 Ancestry.com
* Source: S668051964 Repository: #R650947738 Pennsylvania, Death Certificates, 1906-1964 Ancestry.com Publication: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc.
Raw WikiTree biography markup
== Biography ==
'''Andrew''' Jackson Glasgow. <ref>Source: [[#S668051964]]  Pennsylvania Historic and Museum Commission; Pennsylvania, USA; Certificate Number Range: 023601-026550  </ref><ref>Source: [[#S667239774]]  Year: 1880; Census Place: Gulich, Clearfield, Pennsylvania; Roll: 1117; Page: 430D; Enumeration District: 277  </ref>

'''Born''' 
Abt 1830. 
Pennsylvania<ref>Source: [[#S668051964]]  Pennsylvania Historic and Museum Commission; Pennsylvania, USA; Certificate Number Range: 023601-026550  </ref><ref>Source: [[#S667239774]]  Year: 1880; Census Place: Gulich, Clearfield, Pennsylvania; Roll: 1117; Page: 430D; Enumeration District: 277  </ref>

'''Residence''' Marital Status: MarriedRelation to Head: Self. 
1880
Gulich, Clearfield, Pennsylvania, USA. <ref>Source: [[#S667239774]]  Year: 1880; Census Place: Gulich, Clearfield, Pennsylvania; Roll: 1117; Page: 430D; Enumeration District: 277  </ref>

== Sources ==
<references />
* Source: <span id='S667239774'>S667239774</span> Repository: [[#R650947738]] 1880 United States Federal Census Ancestry.com and The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints Publication: Ancestry.com Operations Inc    
* Repository: <span id='R650947738'>R650947738</span> Ancestry.com
* Source: <span id='S668051964'>S668051964</span> Repository: [[#R650947738]] Pennsylvania, Death Certificates, 1906-1964 Ancestry.com Publication: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc.