Glasgow Surname Project

Individual research record

George Glasgow

c. 1825 – 1893-07-12

Glasgow-766 · 1 mapped association

Lincoln County, Upper CanadaStamford, Welland, Ontario, Canada

At a glance

Identity & family

Tree links organise the family; documentary status still varies.

1Mapped records
3Close relations
4Evidence items
12Candidate leads
Birth
c. 1825 · Lincoln County, Upper Canada
Death
1893-07-12 · Stamford, Welland, Ontario, Canada
Parents
Not recorded
Spouses
Margaret (Dell) Glasgow
Children
Maria Cecilia (Glasgow) MoyerMilton Glasgow
Gender
Male
WikiTree
Glasgow-766
Research clusters
Worldwide One-Tree profile leads
Mapped descendants
2

Comparison context

These child positions and checks are the subject details used to rank possible parents below.

Naming sequence used by the parentage model

Paternal grandfather positionMilton Glasgow (1852)
Maternal grandfather positionNot identifiable from dated child profiles
Maternal grandmother positionMaria Cecilia (Glasgow) Moyer (1858)
Paternal grandmother positionNot identifiable from dated child profiles

Known-position checks: 0 support · 0 conflict. Ordinals retain unnamed children and recognise reused names.

Relationship comparison

Potential parents or duplicates

Compare scored leads with the subject details above—not proof.

Higher-signal leadReview carefullyWeak lead

Possible fathers5 leads

Automated fit31/100
Weak Lead
Dates1795–1851Generation30 years age gapRecorded placesQuebec · Kingston, Frontenac, Canada WestIndependent clue breadth · 5Age · Broad Geography · Same-Sex Generational Naming · Spouse · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 30-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 57 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1852), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • known spouse Ann Mary (Herkimer) Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (22) at the subject's birth (+3)

No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 30-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 57 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1852), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • weak broad-area overlap: canada (+1; not a locality match)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • known spouse Ann Mary (Herkimer) Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (22) at the subject's birth (+3)
  • candidate and subject share the given name George (+5; weak direct parent-child name recurrence, 61 public profiles)

Deductions and cautions: No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required

Automated fit27/100
Weak Lead
Dates1805–1846Generation20 years age gapRecorded placesLocation not supplied — profile holding pointIndependent clue breadth · 3Age · Same-Sex Generational Naming · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 20-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 47 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1852), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)

locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 20-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 47 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1852), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • candidate and subject share the given name George (+5; weak direct parent-child name recurrence, 61 public profiles)

Deductions and cautions: locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Show 3 lower-scoring possible fathers
Automated fit27/100
Weak Lead
Dates1792–?Generation33 years age gapRecorded placesMidlothian — exact locality unprovedIndependent clue breadth · 3Age · Same-Sex Generational Naming · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 33-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 60 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1852), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • candidate and subject share the given name George (+5; weak direct parent-child name recurrence, 61 public profiles)

locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 33-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 60 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1852), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • candidate and subject share the given name George (+5; weak direct parent-child name recurrence, 61 public profiles)

Deductions and cautions: locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Automated fit18/100
Weak Lead
Dates1796–1878Generation29 years age gapRecorded placesPennsylvania, United States · Crocker, Pulaski, Missouri, United States · Pennsylvania, USAIndependent clue breadth · 5Age · Rare Branch-Name Recurrence · Spouse · Spouse-Specific Child Window · Two-GenerationSame-spouse child windowElizabeth (Groff) GlasgowCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 29-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 56 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1852), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • known spouse Elizabeth (Groff) Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (15) at the subject's birth (+3)

candidate is recorded only outside the subject's birth country (−25)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 29-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 56 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1852), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1821–1849) (+6; other parent Elizabeth (Groff) Glasgow)
  • known spouse Elizabeth (Groff) Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (15) at the subject's birth (+3)
  • uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Maria +12 (8 public profiles; subject branch: Maria Cecilia (Glasgow) Moyer; candidate branch: Maria A. (Glasgow) Hale) (+12 total)

Deductions and cautions: candidate is recorded only outside the subject's birth country (−25)

Automated fit11/100
Weak Lead
Dates1819–1899Generationnominally 6 years; approximate dates permit about 16–26 years age gapRecorded placesCoffee County, TennesseeIndependent clue breadth · 3Age · Rare Branch-Name Recurrence · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • the nominal 6-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (16–26 years) (+4)
  • candidate's birth is 33 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1852), a marginal two-generation interval (+1)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)

parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction); subject lies more than 20 years from the candidate's known child-bearing period (−6; children may be missing)

Show complete scoring
  • the nominal 6-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (16–26 years) (+4)
  • candidate's birth is 33 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1852), a marginal two-generation interval (+1)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Maria +12 (8 public profiles; subject branch: Maria Cecilia (Glasgow) Moyer; candidate branch: Maria Glasgow) (+12 total)

Deductions and cautions: parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction); subject lies more than 20 years from the candidate's known child-bearing period (−6; children may be missing)

Possible mothers5 leads

Automated fit10/100
Weak Lead
Dates1799–1886Generation26 years age gapRecorded placesIreland · Guernsey County, Ohio, United States · InishrushIndependent clue breadth · 4Age · Collateral Naming · Household · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 26-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 53 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1852), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • a known child was born within 4 years of the subject (+1)

candidate is recorded only outside the subject's birth country (−25)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 26-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 53 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1852), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • a known child was born within 4 years of the subject (+1)
  • candidate's sibling and niece/nephew network repeats names in the subject's descendant line (three rarest at most): Maria +12 (8 public profiles; sibling Maria Glasgow) (+12 total)

Deductions and cautions: candidate is recorded only outside the subject's birth country (−25)

Automated fit9/100
Weak Lead
Dates1806–?Generation19 years age gapRecorded placesCounty Antrim — exact locality unprovedIndependent clue breadth · 3Age · Collateral Naming · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 19-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 46 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1852), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • candidate's sibling and niece/nephew network repeats names in the subject's descendant line (three rarest at most): Maria +12 (8 public profiles; sibling Maria Glasgow) (+12 total)

candidate is recorded only outside the subject's birth country (−25)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 19-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 46 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1852), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • candidate's sibling and niece/nephew network repeats names in the subject's descendant line (three rarest at most): Maria +12 (8 public profiles; sibling Maria Glasgow) (+12 total)

Deductions and cautions: candidate is recorded only outside the subject's birth country (−25)

Show 3 lower-scoring possible mothers
Automated fit9/100
Weak Lead
Dates1802–?Generation23 years age gapRecorded placesIreland · Boveedy / Bovedy townland and village · County Antrim — exact locality unprovedIndependent clue breadth · 3Age · Collateral Naming · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 23-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 50 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1852), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • candidate's sibling and niece/nephew network repeats names in the subject's descendant line (three rarest at most): Maria +12 (8 public profiles; sibling Maria Glasgow) (+12 total)

candidate is recorded only outside the subject's birth country (−25)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 23-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 50 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1852), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • candidate's sibling and niece/nephew network repeats names in the subject's descendant line (three rarest at most): Maria +12 (8 public profiles; sibling Maria Glasgow) (+12 total)

Deductions and cautions: candidate is recorded only outside the subject's birth country (−25)

Automated fit7/100
Weak Lead
Dates1810–1854Generation15 years age gapRecorded placesSt. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri Territory, United States · Osage, Missouri, USAIndependent clue breadth · 4Age · Rare Branch-Name Recurrence · Spouse-Specific Child Window · Two-GenerationSame-spouse child windowJames Albert GlasgowCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • possible 15-year parent-child age gap (+10)
  • candidate's birth is 42 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1852), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)

candidate is recorded only outside the subject's birth country (−25)

Show complete scoring
  • possible 15-year parent-child age gap (+10)
  • candidate's birth is 42 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1852), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1821–1849) (+6; other parent James Albert Glasgow)
  • uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Maria +12 (8 public profiles; subject branch: Maria Cecilia (Glasgow) Moyer; candidate branch: Maria A. (Glasgow) Hale) (+12 total)

Deductions and cautions: candidate is recorded only outside the subject's birth country (−25)

Automated fit2/100
Weak Lead
Dates1800–?Generation25 years age gapRecorded placesIreland · County Antrim — exact locality unprovedIndependent clue breadth · 3Age · Child Naming · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 25-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 52 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1852), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • candidate's given name recurs among another recorded child (+5; Maria occurs in 8 public profiles)

candidate is recorded only outside the subject's birth country (−25)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 25-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 52 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1852), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • candidate's given name recurs among another recorded child (+5; Maria occurs in 8 public profiles)

Deductions and cautions: candidate is recorded only outside the subject's birth country (−25)

How parent leads are calculated

Automated leads use birth surnames—not married surnames—as parental eligibility, role-specific biological age limits, bounded and approximate-date uncertainty, household chronology, specific time-aware localities, mapped distance, tenancy succession, migration destinations and sex-aware Scottish naming positions across generations. People already attached as the subject's parents stay in the identity summary and are excluded from this alternative-candidate list, regardless of relationship confidence. The main calibration uses clues available on disconnected profiles; existing parent and sibling links are retained as comparison context rather than treated as transferable evidence. Common ordered names and grandparent-to-child echoes receive a small non-zero weight, so a John or James match can support several independent criteria without producing a lead alone. Rare names, repeated bearers and bundles across otherwise distinct branches receive substantially more weight according to catalogue frequency. An exact migration place is weighted by its rarity and repetition across both branches; a shared destination country is worth only one point. Extra weight is added only when at least three independent clue types converge: naming, locality, specific migration, household chronology or collateral networks. Sparse profiles retain a clearly labelled chronology-only fallback instead of disappearing. Countries, states, counties and research clusters do not count as a shared locality, and fallback, broad representative or kin-inferred coordinates are excluded from distance scoring. Shared descendant profiles are removed before branch-name comparison. A candidate already recorded as a parent-in-law is excluded. A confident or independently supported parent is treated as settled; uncertain and unassessed attachments remain open to alternative comparison. A different linked parent, an uncle/aunt or grandparent path, and a matching existing child profile prevent an alternative from being classified as a strong direct-parent lead until the underlying tree conflict or duplicate is resolved. Familiar forms such as Bessie are normalised. Surname remains an eligibility filter worth zero points.

Naming customs, shared farms and occupations are circumstantial. Children, spouses and collateral relatives may be missing, and tree-derived family networks are not independent evidence. Scores rank research leads; they do not prove parentage.

Automated fit46/100
Similar Person
Dates1822–1894PlacesHarford, Maryland, United StatesParent comparisonNo shared parent is indexed
Why it may fit
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 3 (+18)
  • death years within 1 (+10)

No indexed conflict

Full comparison detail
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 3 (+18)
  • death years within 1 (+10)

Conflicts: No indexed conflict

Same-name candidate

George GlasgowGlasgow-3308

Automated fit36/100
Similar Person
Dates1829–?PlacesAyrshire, Scotland, United KingdomParent comparisonNo shared parent is indexed
Why it may fit
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 4 (+18)

No indexed conflict

Full comparison detail
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 4 (+18)

Conflicts: No indexed conflict

How duplicate leads are calculated

Dates are eligibility gates, not merely deductions: chronologically impossible people are excluded. Dates, places, spouses, parent certainty and children's profiles and names are then compared. A high score is a prompt to inspect records, not a merge recommendation.

Open only what you need

Research & records

Life and record timelineChronological mapped occurrences and their underlying sources.1 record
b. 1825

Profile-stated birthplace: Lincoln County, Upper Canada

Lincoln County, Upper Canada

One-Tree export profile fields are search leads, not sources; relationships are shown only where the export supplies parent links.

One-Tree profile leadunknown
Source and mapping detail

WikiTree profile export for Glasgow-766

No sufficiently specific citation match found.

Precision: Country-centre fallback for profile locality

Evidence assessmentWhat is supported, uncertain or disputed in the current case model.4 claims
3Derivative
1Tree Only

Documented or strongly supported

No claims in this category have been formally assessed.

Working hypotheses and conflicts

No claims in this category have been formally assessed.

Research questionsOpen problems, missing bridges and the next records to inspect.0 open

No formal open question is recorded for this person.

Sources and provenanceStructured citations and source-quality classifications.4 sources
Technical profile and raw captureDataset metadata, machine dossier and captured WikiTree biography.Advanced

WikiTree profile information

Dataset: ONT_Glasco_2026-08-18T16_05.json · generated 2026-08-20

Machine-readable dossier

WikiTree biography, citations and relationship snapshot

Glasgow-766 was captured 2026-08-07T09:54:35+00:00; WikiTree profile revision 2023-08-02.

Profile location claims

EventDateLocationStatus
birthLincoln County, Upper CanadaWikiTree profile field
deathStamford, Welland, Ontario, CanadaWikiTree profile field

Immediate relationship snapshot

RelationshipPersonWikiTree IDDates and places returned
ChildrenMilton GlasgowGlasgow-7651852-05-01 · Canada West · 1933-08-13 · Willoughby, Ontario, Canada
ChildrenMaria Cecilia MoyerGlasgow-7641858-11-21 · Stamford, Welland, Canada West · 1937-02-28 · Stamford, Welland, Ontario, Canada
SpousesMargaret GlasgowDell-16591829-00-00 · Willoughby Township, Upper Canada · 1898-05-19 · Stamford, Welland, Ontario, Canada · 0000-00-00

Profile categories

Stamford Township,_Ontario Stamford_Township,_Ontario

Record-bearing passages

  • Biography Stamford Township farmer. Sources *"Canada Census, 1881," database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:MVF6-448 : 11 March 2018), George Glasgow, ; from "1881 Canadian Census." Database with images. Ancestry. (www.ancestry.com : 2008); citing Stamford, Welland, Ontario, Canada; 1825; p. 17; Library and Archives Canada film number C-13253, Library and Archives Canada, Ottawa, Ontario. *"Canada Census, 1891," database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:MWG2-QCF : 3 August 2016), George Glasgow, Stamford, Welland, Ontario, Canada; Public Archives, Ottawa, Ontario; Library and Archives Canada film number 30953_148178. *"Ontario Deaths, 1869-1937 and Overseas Deaths, 1939-1947," database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:JKC9-93V : 9 March 2018), George Glasgow, 12 Jul 1893; citing Stamford, Welland, Ontario, p 555 cn 18081, Archives of Ontario, Toronto; FHL microfilm 1,853,580.

Profile source citations

  1. "Canada Census, 1881," database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:MVF6-448 : 11 March 2018), George Glasgow, ; from "1881 Canadian Census." Database with images. Ancestry. (www.ancestry.com : 2008); citing Stamford, Welland, Ontario, Canada; 1825; p. 17; Library and Archives Canada film number C-13253, Library and Archives Canada, Ottawa, Ontario. source link 1
  2. "Canada Census, 1891," database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:MWG2-QCF : 3 August 2016), George Glasgow, Stamford, Welland, Ontario, Canada; Public Archives, Ottawa, Ontario; Library and Archives Canada film number 30953_148178. source link 1
  3. "Ontario Deaths, 1869-1937 and Overseas Deaths, 1939-1947," database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:JKC9-93V : 9 March 2018), George Glasgow, 12 Jul 1893; citing Stamford, Welland, Ontario, p 555 cn 18081, Archives of Ontario, Toronto; FHL microfilm 1,853,580. source link 1
Full captured biography text
Biography
Stamford Township farmer.
Sources
*"Canada Census, 1881," database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:MVF6-448 : 11 March 2018), George Glasgow, ; from "1881 Canadian Census." Database with images. Ancestry. (www.ancestry.com : 2008); citing Stamford, Welland, Ontario, Canada; 1825; p. 17; Library and Archives Canada film number C-13253, Library and Archives Canada, Ottawa, Ontario. 
*"Canada Census, 1891," database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:MWG2-QCF : 3 August 2016), George Glasgow, Stamford, Welland, Ontario, Canada; Public Archives, Ottawa, Ontario; Library and Archives Canada film number 30953_148178.
*"Ontario Deaths, 1869-1937 and Overseas Deaths, 1939-1947," database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:JKC9-93V : 9 March 2018), George Glasgow, 12 Jul 1893; citing Stamford, Welland, Ontario, p 555 cn 18081, Archives of Ontario, Toronto; FHL microfilm 1,853,580.
Raw WikiTree biography markup
[[Category:Stamford Township,_Ontario]]


== Biography ==
Stamford Township farmer.

== Sources ==
<references />
*"Canada Census, 1881," database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:MVF6-448 : 11 March 2018), George Glasgow, ; from "1881 Canadian Census." Database with images. Ancestry. (www.ancestry.com : 2008); citing Stamford, Welland, Ontario, Canada; 1825; p. 17; Library and Archives Canada film number C-13253, Library and Archives Canada, Ottawa, Ontario. 
*"Canada Census, 1891," database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:MWG2-QCF : 3 August 2016), George Glasgow, Stamford, Welland, Ontario, Canada; Public Archives, Ottawa, Ontario; Library and Archives Canada film number 30953_148178.
*"Ontario Deaths, 1869-1937 and Overseas Deaths, 1939-1947," database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:JKC9-93V : 9 March 2018), George Glasgow, 12 Jul 1893; citing Stamford, Welland, Ontario, p 555 cn 18081, Archives of Ontario, Toronto; FHL microfilm 1,853,580.