Glasgow Surname Project

Individual research record

William James Glasgow

1880-09-26 – 1951-03-19

Glasgow-904 · 1 mapped association

Auckland, New Zealand→Waihi Public Hospital, Waikato, New Zealand
View on mapOpen WikiTreeCompareReport a correction

At a glance

Identity & family

Tree links organise the family; documentary status still varies.

1Mapped records
7Close relations
7Evidence items
18Candidate leads
Birth
1880-09-26 · Auckland, New Zealand
Death
1951-03-19 · Waihi Public Hospital, Waikato, New Zealand
Parents
Not recorded
Spouses
Clara Emma (Wilton) Glasgow
Children
DavId GlasgowGeorge GlasgowJean (Glasgow) DeanLiving person (details withheld)Mavis Violet GlasgowWilliam James Glasgow
Gender
Male
WikiTree
Glasgow-904
Research clusters
Worldwide One-Tree profile leads
Mapped descendants
11

Comparison context

These child positions and checks are the subject details used to rank possible parents below.

Naming sequence used by the parentage model

Paternal grandfather positionWilliam James Glasgow (1910)
Maternal grandfather positionDavId Glasgow (1913)
Maternal grandmother positionMavis Violet Glasgow (1911)
Paternal grandmother positionJean (Glasgow) Dean (1914)

Known-position checks: 0 support · 1 conflict. Ordinals retain unnamed children and recognise reused names.

Relationship comparison

Potential parents or duplicates

Compare scored leads with the subject details above—not proof.

Higher-signal leadReview carefullyWeak lead

Possible fathers5 leads

Automated fit39/100
Weak Lead
Dates1849–?Generation31 years age gapRecorded placesNew BrunswickIndependent clue breadth · 4Age · Collateral Naming · Spouse · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 31-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • known spouse Letitia Lane (Leavitt) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (28) at the subject's birth (+7)
  • candidate's birth is 61 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1910), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)

locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction); descendant-name recurrence has no independent household, record, migration or specific-locality anchor (score capped at 39)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 31-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 61 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1910), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • known spouse Letitia Lane (Leavitt) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (28) at the subject's birth (+7)
  • candidate's sibling and niece/nephew network repeats names in the subject's descendant line (three rarest at most): Ada +14 (7 public profiles; sibling Ada Atcheson) (+14 total)

Deductions and cautions: locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction); descendant-name recurrence has no independent household, record, migration or specific-locality anchor (score capped at 39)

Automated fit39/100
Weak Lead
Dates1843–1924Generation37 years age gapRecorded placesIndia · Roslyn, Otago, New ZealandIndependent clue breadth · 8Age · Broad Geography · Household · Same-Sex Generational Naming · Sex-Aware Ordered Naming · Spouse · Tradition Validation · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 37-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • known spouse Marion Cameron (Younger) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (24) at the subject's birth (+7)
  • candidate's birth is 67 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1910), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)

No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 37-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 67 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1910), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • weak broad-area overlap: zealand (+1; not a locality match)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • a known child was born within 4 years of the subject (+1)
  • known spouse Marion Cameron (Younger) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (24) at the subject's birth (+7)
  • candidate and subject share the given name William (+4; weak direct parent-child name recurrence, 223 public profiles)
  • candidate's name matches the first dated son William James Glasgow, the expected father position for a male subject (+4; catalogue rarity 0, William in 223 profiles)
  • family naming controls: 0 supporting and 1 conflicting known positions (already reflected in naming weight)

Deductions and cautions: No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required

Show 3 lower-scoring possible fathers
Automated fit39/100
Weak Lead
Dates1840–?Generation40 years age gapRecorded placesKirkurdIndependent clue breadth · 7Age · Common Parental Couple Naming · Same-Sex Generational Naming · Sex-Aware Ordered Naming · Spouse · Tradition Validation · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 40-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • known spouse Jean (Watson) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (39) at the subject's birth (+7)
  • candidate's birth is 70 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1910), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)

locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction); descendant-name recurrence has no independent household, record, migration or specific-locality anchor (score capped at 39)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 40-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 70 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1910), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • known spouse Jean (Watson) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (39) at the subject's birth (+7)
  • candidate and subject share the given name William (+4; weak direct parent-child name recurrence, 223 public profiles)
  • candidate's name matches the first dated son William James Glasgow, the expected father position for a male subject (+4; catalogue rarity 0, William in 223 profiles)
  • family naming controls: 0 supporting and 1 conflicting known positions (already reflected in naming weight)
  • a candidate spouse matches the second dated daughter Jean (Glasgow) Dean, the expected mother position (+4; Jean in 42 profiles)
  • candidate and spouse jointly match both grandparent positions in the same child group (+3; combined catalogue rarity 1)

Deductions and cautions: locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction); descendant-name recurrence has no independent household, record, migration or specific-locality anchor (score capped at 39)

Automated fit36/100
Weak Lead
Dates1850–?Generation30 years age gapRecorded placesNew BrunswickIndependent clue breadth · 3Age · Collateral Naming · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 30-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 60 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1910), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)

locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 30-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 60 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1910), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • candidate's sibling and niece/nephew network repeats names in the subject's descendant line (three rarest at most): Ada +14 (7 public profiles; sibling Ada Atcheson) (+14 total)

Deductions and cautions: locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Automated fit35/100
Weak Lead
Dates1854–1940Generation26 years age gapRecorded placesIowa, United States · Clarinda, Page, Iowa, United StatesIndependent clue breadth · 6Age · Collateral Naming · Same-Sex Generational Naming · Sex-Aware Ordered Naming · Tradition Validation · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 26-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 56 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1910), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)

candidate is recorded only outside the subject's birth country (−25)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 26-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 56 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1910), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • candidate and subject share the given name William (+4; weak direct parent-child name recurrence, 223 public profiles)
  • candidate's name matches the first dated son William James Glasgow, the expected father position for a male subject (+4; catalogue rarity 0, William in 223 profiles)
  • family naming controls: 0 supporting and 1 conflicting known positions (already reflected in naming weight)
  • candidate's sibling and niece/nephew network repeats names in the subject's descendant line (three rarest at most): Stanley +16 (2 public profiles; niece/nephew Stanley James Glasgow); Donald +14 (4 public profiles; sibling Donald Cargill Glasgow) (+30 total)

Deductions and cautions: candidate is recorded only outside the subject's birth country (−25)

Possible mothers5 leads

Automated fit33/100
Weak Lead
Dates1841–?Generation39 years age gapRecorded placesKirkurdIndependent clue breadth · 5Age · Common Parental Couple Naming · Sex-Aware Ordered Naming · Tradition Validation · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 39-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 69 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1910), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)

locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 39-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 69 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1910), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • candidate's name matches the second dated daughter Jean (Glasgow) Dean, the expected mother position for a male subject (+5; catalogue rarity 1, Jean in 42 profiles)
  • family naming controls: 0 supporting and 1 conflicting known positions (already reflected in naming weight)
  • a candidate spouse matches the first dated son William James Glasgow, the expected father position (+3; William in 223 profiles)
  • candidate and spouse jointly match both grandparent positions in the same child group (+3; combined catalogue rarity 1)

Deductions and cautions: locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Automated fit30/100
Weak Lead
Dates1840–1923Generation40 years age gapRecorded placesAllegheny, Pennsylvania, United States · Page, Iowa, United StatesIndependent clue breadth · 4Age · Collateral Naming · Sex-Aware Ordered Naming · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 40-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 70 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1910), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)

candidate is recorded only outside the subject's birth country (−25)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 40-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 70 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1910), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • a candidate spouse matches the first dated son William James Glasgow, the expected father position (+3; William in 223 profiles)
  • candidate's sibling and niece/nephew network repeats names in the subject's descendant line (three rarest at most): Stanley +16 (2 public profiles; niece/nephew Stanley James Glasgow); Donald +14 (4 public profiles; sibling Donald Cargill Glasgow) (+30 total)

Deductions and cautions: candidate is recorded only outside the subject's birth country (−25)

Show 3 lower-scoring possible mothers
Automated fit27/100
Weak Lead
Dates1856–1896Generation24 years age gapRecorded placesStoke on Trent, Staffordshire, England, United Kingdom · New ZealandIndependent clue breadth · 5Age · Broad Geography · Household · Sex-Aware Ordered Naming · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 24-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 54 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1910), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • a known child was born within 4 years of the subject (+1)

No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 24-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 54 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1910), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • weak broad-area overlap: zealand (+1; not a locality match)
  • a known child was born within 4 years of the subject (+1)
  • a candidate spouse matches the first dated son William James Glasgow, the expected father position (+3; William in 223 profiles)

Deductions and cautions: No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required

Automated fit27/100
Weak Lead
Dates1851–?Generation29 years age gapRecorded placesPennsylvania, United States · Iowa, United StatesIndependent clue breadth · 3Age · Collateral Naming · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 29-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 59 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1910), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)

candidate is recorded only outside the subject's birth country (−25)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 29-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 59 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1910), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • candidate's sibling and niece/nephew network repeats names in the subject's descendant line (three rarest at most): Stanley +16 (2 public profiles; niece/nephew Stanley James Glasgow); Donald +14 (4 public profiles; sibling Donald Cargill Glasgow) (+30 total)

Deductions and cautions: candidate is recorded only outside the subject's birth country (−25)

Automated fit26/100
Weak Lead
Dates1869–1941Generationnominally 11 years; approximate dates permit about 15–21 years age gapRecorded placesAuckland, New ZealandIndependent clue breadth · 5Age · Indirect Multi-Factor Convergence · Sex-Aware Ordered Naming · Two-Generation · Undated LocalityCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • candidate is associated with the subject's stated birthplace, but not by a reliable near-contemporary record (+10)
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming
  • the nominal 11-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (15–21 years) (+4)

parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction)

Show complete scoring
  • the nominal 11-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (15–21 years) (+4)
  • candidate's birth is 41 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1910), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • candidate is associated with the subject's stated birthplace, but not by a reliable near-contemporary record (+10)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • a candidate spouse matches the first dated son William James Glasgow, the expected father position (+3; William in 223 profiles)
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming

Deductions and cautions: parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction)

How parent leads are calculated

Automated leads use birth surnames—not married surnames—as parental eligibility, role-specific biological age limits, bounded and approximate-date uncertainty, household chronology, specific time-aware localities, mapped distance, tenancy succession, migration destinations and sex-aware Scottish naming positions across generations. People already attached as the subject's parents stay in the identity summary and are excluded from this alternative-candidate list, regardless of relationship confidence. The main calibration uses clues available on disconnected profiles; existing parent and sibling links are retained as comparison context rather than treated as transferable evidence. Common ordered names and grandparent-to-child echoes receive a small non-zero weight, so a John or James match can support several independent criteria without producing a lead alone. Rare names, repeated bearers and bundles across otherwise distinct branches receive substantially more weight according to catalogue frequency. An exact migration place is weighted by its rarity and repetition across both branches; a shared destination country is worth only one point. Extra weight is added only when at least three independent clue types converge: naming, locality, specific migration, household chronology or collateral networks. Sparse profiles retain a clearly labelled chronology-only fallback instead of disappearing. Countries, states, counties and research clusters do not count as a shared locality, and fallback, broad representative or kin-inferred coordinates are excluded from distance scoring. Shared descendant profiles are removed before branch-name comparison. A candidate already recorded as a parent-in-law is excluded. A confident or independently supported parent is treated as settled; uncertain and unassessed attachments remain open to alternative comparison. A different linked parent, an uncle/aunt or grandparent path, and a matching existing child profile prevent an alternative from being classified as a strong direct-parent lead until the underlying tree conflict or duplicate is resolved. Familiar forms such as Bessie are normalised. Surname remains an eligibility filter worth zero points.

Naming customs, shared farms and occupations are circumstantial. Children, spouses and collateral relatives may be missing, and tree-derived family networks are not independent evidence. Scores rank research leads; they do not prove parentage.

Automated fit68/100
Similar Person
Dates1878–1948PlacesAuckland, New Zealand → Auckland, New ZealandParent comparisonNo shared parent is indexed
Why it may fit
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 2 (+25)
  • death years within 3 (+5)

No indexed conflict

Full comparison detail
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 2 (+25)
  • death years within 3 (+5)
  • shared recorded place (+20)

Conflicts: No indexed conflict

Open side-by-side comparison

Same-name candidate

William GlasgowGlasgow-1109

Automated fit58/100
Similar Person
Dates1880–1952Places59 McKechnie St, Calton, Glasgow → Rothesay, Bute, Scotland, United KingdomParent comparisonNo shared parent is indexed
Why it may fit
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • same birth year (+30)
  • death years within 1 (+10)

No indexed conflict

Full comparison detail
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • same birth year (+30)
  • death years within 1 (+10)

Conflicts: No indexed conflict

Open side-by-side comparison

Same-name candidate

William GlasgowGlasgow-3377

Automated fit50/100
Similar Person
Dates1880–1939PlacesGlasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland, United Kingdom → Glasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland, United KingdomParent comparisonNo shared parent is indexed
Why it may fit
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • same birth year (+30)
  • child given-name pattern overlaps: William

No indexed conflict

Full comparison detail
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • same birth year (+30)
  • child given-name pattern overlaps: William

Conflicts: No indexed conflict

Open side-by-side comparison
Automated fit48/100
Similar Person
Dates1878–1956PlacesClinton, Huron, Ontario, Canada → Seattle, King, Washington, United StatesParent comparisonNo shared parent is indexed
Why it may fit
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 2 (+25)
  • death years within 5 (+5)

No indexed conflict

Full comparison detail
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 2 (+25)
  • death years within 5 (+5)

Conflicts: No indexed conflict

Open side-by-side comparison
Show 4 lower-scoring duplicate lead(s)
Automated fit48/100
Similar Person
Dates1880–?PlacesBeltonanean, Kildress, County Tyrone, Ireland, United KingdomParent comparisonNo shared parent is indexed
Why it may fit
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • same birth year (+30)

No indexed conflict

Full comparison detail
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • same birth year (+30)

Conflicts: No indexed conflict

Open side-by-side comparison
Automated fit43/100
Similar Person
Dates1878–1962PlacesArmagh, County Armagh, Ireland, United Kingdom → Summit, Union, New Jersey, United StatesParent comparisonNo shared parent is indexed
Why it may fit
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 2 (+25)

No indexed conflict

Full comparison detail
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 2 (+25)

Conflicts: No indexed conflict

Open side-by-side comparison
Automated fit43/100
Similar Person
Dates1882–?PlacesBallynasollus, Kildress, Cookstown, County Tyrone, Ireland, United KingdomParent comparisonNo shared parent is indexed
Why it may fit
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 2 (+25)

No indexed conflict

Full comparison detail
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 2 (+25)

Conflicts: No indexed conflict

Open side-by-side comparison

Same-name candidate

William GlasgowGlasgow-356

Automated fit43/100
Similar Person
Dates1882–1960PlacesKentucky, United States → Lyon, Kentucky, United StatesParent comparisonNo shared parent is indexed
Why it may fit
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 2 (+25)

No indexed conflict

Full comparison detail
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 2 (+25)

Conflicts: No indexed conflict

Open side-by-side comparison
How duplicate leads are calculated

Dates are eligibility gates, not merely deductions: chronologically impossible people are excluded. Dates, places, spouses, parent certainty and children's profiles and names are then compared. A high score is a prompt to inspect records, not a merge recommendation.

Open only what you need

Research & records

Life and record timelineChronological mapped occurrences and their underlying sources.1 record
b. 1880

Profile-stated birthplace: Auckland, New Zealand

Auckland, New Zealand

One-Tree export profile fields are search leads, not sources; relationships are shown only where the export supplies parent links.

One-Tree profile leadunknown
Source and mapping detail

WikiTree profile export for Glasgow-904

Candidate matched on record type, year; inspect before treating it as the underlying record.

Precision: Country-centre fallback for profile locality

Evidence assessmentWhat is supported, uncertain or disputed in the current case model.7 claims
4Unknown
3Tree Only

Documented or strongly supported

No claims in this category have been formally assessed.

Working hypotheses and conflicts

No claims in this category have been formally assessed.

Research questionsOpen problems, missing bridges and the next records to inspect.0 open

No formal open question is recorded for this person.

Sources and provenanceStructured citations and source-quality classifications.7 sources

Source or provenance: quality describes the record layer, not every conclusion drawn from it.

  1. tree_only Geni World Family Tree URL: Confidence: Direct and primary evidence Citation text: William Glasgow<br>Gender: Male<br>Birth: 18880 - Thames, Waikato, New Zealand<br>Marriage: Spouse: Clara Emma Glasgow (born Wilton) - July 29 1910 - In the house o
  2. tree_only MyHeritage Family Trees (https://www.myheritage.com : accessed 10 September 2019), Person #437577731:3513458 for William Glasgow.
  3. unknown Below from (https://www.bdmhistoricalrecords.dia.govt.nz)
  4. unknown NZ Birth Registration 1880/16479
  5. unknown NZ Marriage Registration 1910/4037
  6. unknown NZ Death Registration 1951/19891 Age: 72Y
  7. tree_only WikiTree profile export for Glasgow-904
Technical profile and raw captureDataset metadata, machine dossier and captured WikiTree biography.Advanced

WikiTree profile information

Dataset: ONT_Glasco_2026-08-18T16_05.json · generated 2026-08-20

Machine-readable dossier

WikiTree biography, citations and relationship snapshot

Glasgow-904 was captured 2026-08-07T09:54:35+00:00; WikiTree profile revision 2025-11-07.

Profile location claims

EventDateLocationStatus
birth—Auckland, New ZealandWikiTree profile field
death—Waihi Public Hospital, Waikato, New ZealandWikiTree profile field
marriage1910-07-29New ZealandWikiTree relationship field

Immediate relationship snapshot

RelationshipPersonWikiTree IDDates and places returned
ChildrenWilliam James GlasgowGlasgow-9051910-08-03 · New Zealand · 1984-10-25
ChildrenMavis Violet GlasgowGlasgow-9101911-10-00 · New Zealand · 1954-00-00 · Tauranga, Bay Of Plenty, New Zealand
ChildrenDavId GlasgowGlasgow-9111913-02-05 · New Zealand · 1982-11-11
ChildrenJean DeanGlasgow-9151914-08-05 · Waihi, Hauraki, Waikato, New Zealand · 2005-04-27
ChildrenEdnaGlasglow-41915-11-30 · New Zealand · 1990-00-00
ChildrenMaryGlasgow-9161918-00-00 · 0000-00-00
ChildrenGeorge GlasgowGlasgow-9171920-00-00 · New Zealand · 2015-00-00
SpousesClara Emma GlasgowWilton-12401889-11-09 · Thames, Waikato, New Zealand · 1948-01-08 · Waihi, Waikato, New Zealand · 1910-07-29 · New Zealand

Record-bearing passages

  • Biography Birth: 1880 - Thames, Waikato, New Zealand Geni World Family Tree URL: https://www.geni.com/people/William-Glasgow/6000000049184466403 Confidence: Direct and primary evidence Citation text: William Glasgow<br>Gender: Male<br>Birth: 18880 - Thames, Waikato, New Zealand<br>Marriage: Spouse: Clara Emma Glasgow (born Wilton) - July 29 1910 - In the house of Mrs Murray, Thames, Waikato, New Zealand<br>Death: Mar 19 1951 - Public Hospital, Waihi, Hauraki, Waikato, New Zealand<br>Burial: Waihi Public Cemetery, Waihi, Hauraki, Waikato, New Zealand<br>Father: James Glasgow <br>Mother: Jane Glasgow (born Kerr) <br>Wife: Clara Emma Glasgow (born Wilton) <br>Children: William James Glasgow , Mavis Violet Gardiner (born Glasgow) , David Glasgow , Jean Dean (born Glasgow) , Edna May Glasgow , NR Glasgow, st.

  • Fact: Marriage (July 29 1910) In the house of Mrs Murray, Thames, Waikato, New Zealand

    • Fact: Burial Waihi Public Cemetery, Waihi, Hauraki, Waikato, New Zealand Sources
    • MyHeritage Family Trees (https://www.myheritage.com : accessed 10 September 2019), Person #437577731:3513458 for William Glasgow.

  • Below from (https://www.bdmhistoricalrecords.dia.govt.nz)

    • NZ Birth Registration 1880/16479
    • NZ Marriage Registration 1910/4037
    • NZ Death Registration 1951/19891 Age: 72Y

Profile source citations

  1. Geni World Family Tree URL: https://www.geni.com/people/William-Glasgow/6000000049184466403 Confidence: Direct and primary evidence Citation text: William Glasgow<br>Gender: Male<br>Birth: 18880 - Thames, Waikato, New Zealand<br>Marriage: Spouse: Clara Emma Glasgow (born Wilton) - July 29 1910 - In the house of Mrs Murray, Thames, Waikato, New Zealand<br>Death: Mar 19 1951 - Public Hospital, Waihi, Hauraki, Waikato, New Zealand<br>Burial: Waihi Public Cemetery, Waihi, Hauraki, Waikato, New Zealand<br>Father: James Glasgow <br>Mother: Jane Glasgow (born Kerr) <br>Wife: Clara Emma Glasgow (born Wilton) <br>Children: William James Glasgow , Mavis Violet Gardiner (born Glasgow) , David Glasgow , Jean Dean (born Glasgow) , Edna May Glasgow , NR Glasgow, st. source link 1
  2. MyHeritage Family Trees (https://www.myheritage.com : accessed 10 September 2019), Person #437577731:3513458 for William Glasgow. source link 1
  3. Below from (https://www.bdmhistoricalrecords.dia.govt.nz) source link 1
  4. NZ Birth Registration 1880/16479
  5. NZ Marriage Registration 1910/4037
  6. NZ Death Registration 1951/19891 Age: 72Y
Full captured biography text
Biography
Birth: 1880 - Thames, Waikato, New Zealand Geni World Family Tree
URL: https://www.geni.com/people/William-Glasgow/6000000049184466403
Confidence: Direct and primary evidence
Citation text:
William Glasgow<br>Gender: Male<br>Birth: 18880 - Thames, Waikato, New Zealand<br>Marriage: Spouse: Clara Emma Glasgow (born Wilton) - July 29 1910 - In the house of Mrs Murray, Thames, Waikato, New Zealand<br>Death: Mar 19 1951 - Public Hospital, Waihi, Hauraki, Waikato, New Zealand<br>Burial: Waihi Public Cemetery, Waihi, Hauraki, Waikato, New Zealand<br>Father: James Glasgow <br>Mother: Jane Glasgow (born Kerr) <br>Wife: Clara Emma Glasgow (born Wilton) <br>Children: William James Glasgow , Mavis Violet Gardiner (born Glasgow) , David Glasgow , Jean Dean (born Glasgow) , Edna May Glasgow , NR Glasgow, st. 

* Fact: Marriage (July 29 1910) In the house of Mrs Murray, Thames, Waikato, New Zealand
* Fact: Burial Waihi Public Cemetery, Waihi, Hauraki, Waikato, New Zealand
Sources
* MyHeritage Family Trees (https://www.myheritage.com : accessed 10 September 2019), Person #437577731:3513458 for William Glasgow.

* Below from (https://www.bdmhistoricalrecords.dia.govt.nz)
* NZ Birth Registration 1880/16479
* NZ Marriage Registration 1910/4037
* NZ Death Registration 1951/19891 Age: 72Y
Raw WikiTree biography markup
== Biography ==
Birth: 1880 - Thames, Waikato, New Zealand<ref>Geni World Family Tree
URL: https://www.geni.com/people/William-Glasgow/6000000049184466403
Confidence: Direct and primary evidence
Citation text:
William Glasgow&lt;br&gt;Gender: Male&lt;br&gt;Birth: 18880 - Thames, Waikato, New Zealand&lt;br&gt;Marriage: Spouse: Clara Emma Glasgow (born Wilton) - July 29 1910 - In the house of Mrs Murray, Thames, Waikato, New Zealand&lt;br&gt;Death: Mar 19 1951 - Public Hospital, Waihi, Hauraki, Waikato, New Zealand&lt;br&gt;Burial: Waihi Public Cemetery, Waihi, Hauraki, Waikato, New Zealand&lt;br&gt;Father: <a>James Glasgow</a>&lt;br&gt;Mother: <a>Jane Glasgow (born Kerr)</a>&lt;br&gt;Wife: <a>Clara Emma Glasgow (born Wilton)</a>&lt;br&gt;Children: <a>William James Glasgow</a>, <a>Mavis Violet Gardiner (born Glasgow)</a>, <a>David Glasgow</a>, <a>Jean Dean (born Glasgow)</a>, <a>Edna May Glasgow</a>, <a>NR Glasgow, st.</a></ref>

* Fact: Marriage (July 29 1910) In the house of Mrs Murray, Thames, Waikato, New Zealand
* Fact: Burial Waihi Public Cemetery, Waihi, Hauraki, Waikato, New Zealand

== Sources ==
<references />
* MyHeritage Family Trees (https://www.myheritage.com : accessed 10 September 2019), Person #437577731:3513458 for William Glasgow.

* Below from (https://www.bdmhistoricalrecords.dia.govt.nz)
* NZ Birth Registration 1880/16479
* NZ Marriage Registration 1910/4037
* NZ Death Registration 1951/19891 Age: 72Y