Suggested profile text
WikiTree profile and prepared draft
WikiTree profile text
The prepared text for the public WikiTree profile, kept here so it can be compared with the current profile.
The prepared amendment is already on WikiTree; no pending biography change.
Compared with Glasgow-3903, captured 2026-09-27T03:22:58+00:00 · 2026-09-23.
Current captured WikiTree biography
Read-only capture used for the comparison above.
Side-by-side comparison of the live and replacement profiles
No biography changes in this draft.
Current profileReplacement profile
Current profile1[[Category:Glasgow Name Study]]
Replacement profile1[[Category:Glasgow Name Study]]
Current profile2{{Estimated Date}}
Replacement profile2{{Estimated Date}}
Current profile3{{Ireland Native}}
Replacement profile3{{Ireland Native}}
Current profile4
Replacement profile4
Current profile5== Biography ==
Replacement profile5== Biography ==
Current profile6'''James Glasgow''' was born about 1794, calculated from the age of eighty-four reported at his death. The Glasgow family monument at Tamlaght O'Crilly calls him a son of [[Glasgow-3902|Adam Glasgow]] and Rose.<ref name="Grave">[https://www.oneirishrover.com/tamlaght-graveyard/ ''Tamlaght O'Crilly Lower Graveyard''], transcription of the Adam and Rose Glasgow family monument.</ref>
Replacement profile6'''James Glasgow''' was born about 1794, calculated from the age of eighty-four reported at his death. The Glasgow family monument at Tamlaght O'Crilly calls him a son of [[Glasgow-3902|Adam Glasgow]] and Rose.<ref name="Grave">[https://www.oneirishrover.com/tamlaght-graveyard/ ''Tamlaght O'Crilly Lower Graveyard''], transcription of the Adam and Rose Glasgow family monument.</ref>
Current profile7
Replacement profile7
Current profile8The leading civil record identifies James as a married farmer of Inishrush who died there on 12 December 1878, reportedly aged eighty-four. Henry Glasgow was present at the death; the register does not state Henry's relationship.<ref name="Death1878">[https://www.irishgenealogy.ie/files/civil/deaths_returns/deaths_1878/020497/7192875.pdf General Register Office of Ireland, civil death register], James Glasgow, Inishrush, 12 December 1878, entry 138; [https://www.irishgenealogy.ie/view/?record_id=cide-5928386 database entry].</ref>
Replacement profile8The leading civil record identifies James as a married farmer of Inishrush who died there on 12 December 1878, reportedly aged eighty-four. Henry Glasgow was present at the death; the register does not state Henry's relationship.<ref name="Death1878">[https://www.irishgenealogy.ie/files/civil/deaths_returns/deaths_1878/020497/7192875.pdf General Register Office of Ireland, civil death register], James Glasgow, Inishrush, 12 December 1878, entry 138; [https://www.irishgenealogy.ie/view/?record_id=cide-5928386 database entry].</ref>
Current profile9
Replacement profile9
Current profile10The family monument transcribes the death as 11 December, one day earlier than the civil register.<ref name="Grave" /> The two sources concern the same death; the original civil-register date is used for the structured field and the one-day conflict is retained here.
Replacement profile10The family monument transcribes the death as 11 December, one day earlier than the civil register.<ref name="Grave" /> The two sources concern the same death; the original civil-register date is used for the structured field and the one-day conflict is retained here.
Current profile11
Replacement profile11
Current profile12Adam Glasgow's 1833 tithe entry gives a gross area of eleven Irish or Plantation acres, approximately 17.82 statute acres under the National Archives of Ireland's published conversion guidance.<ref name="AdamTithe">Public Record Office of Northern Ireland, Tamlaght O'Crilly Tithe Applotment Book, PRONI FIN/5/A/254B, image 20, manuscript folio 16, Adam Glasgow at Inishrush; [https://www.nationalarchives.ie/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Family_History_Sources_NAI.pdf National Archives of Ireland, ''Family History Sources''], tithe-acreage guidance.</ref> James later occupied Inishrush plot 29 in the Valuation Revision Books, but the similar acreages and later occupancy are evidence of a property sequence, not a stated inheritance or proof that every James entry concerns this profile.<ref name="Valuation">Public Record Office of Northern Ireland, Valuation Revision Books, Inishrush plot 29, VAL/12/B/34/10A–10D; [https://apps.proni.gov.uk/Val12B/Search.aspx PRONI Valuation Revision Books search].</ref>
Replacement profile12Adam Glasgow's 1833 tithe entry gives a gross area of eleven Irish or Plantation acres, approximately 17.82 statute acres under the National Archives of Ireland's published conversion guidance.<ref name="AdamTithe">Public Record Office of Northern Ireland, Tamlaght O'Crilly Tithe Applotment Book, PRONI FIN/5/A/254B, image 20, manuscript folio 16, Adam Glasgow at Inishrush; [https://www.nationalarchives.ie/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Family_History_Sources_NAI.pdf National Archives of Ireland, ''Family History Sources''], tithe-acreage guidance.</ref> James later occupied Inishrush plot 29 in the Valuation Revision Books, but the similar acreages and later occupancy are evidence of a property sequence, not a stated inheritance or proof that every James entry concerns this profile.<ref name="Valuation">Public Record Office of Northern Ireland, Valuation Revision Books, Inishrush plot 29, VAL/12/B/34/10A–10D; [https://apps.proni.gov.uk/Val12B/Search.aspx PRONI Valuation Revision Books search].</ref>
Current profile13
Replacement profile13
Current profile14== Research Notes ==
Replacement profile14== Research Notes ==
Current profile15=== Current evidence assessment ===
Replacement profile15=== Current evidence assessment ===
Current profile16
Replacement profile16
Current profile17==== The two James identities ====
Replacement profile17==== The two James identities ====
Current profile18An original 1851 marriage records another—or possibly the same—James Glasgow as a 38-year-old bachelor farmer of Inishrush, son of Adam Glasgow. He married Rosanna Barkley, daughter of Henry Barkley.<ref name="Marriage1851">[https://www.irishgenealogy.ie/view/?record_id=cima-3208068 IrishGenealogy.ie], marriage of James Glasgow and Rosanna Barkley, 17 March 1851.</ref> A man aged 38 in 1851 would have been about 65 or 66 in 1878, not 84. The records agree on name, father's name, occupation and locality but conflict by about nineteen years in age.
Replacement profile18An original 1851 marriage records another—or possibly the same—James Glasgow as a 38-year-old bachelor farmer of Inishrush, son of Adam Glasgow. He married Rosanna Barkley, daughter of Henry Barkley.<ref name="Marriage1851">[https://www.irishgenealogy.ie/view/?record_id=cima-3208068 IrishGenealogy.ie], marriage of James Glasgow and Rosanna Barkley, 17 March 1851.</ref> A man aged 38 in 1851 would have been about 65 or 66 in 1878, not 84. The records agree on name, father's name, occupation and locality but conflict by about nineteen years in age.
Current profile19
Replacement profile19
Current profile20This profile represents the monument-defined son of Adam and Rose and the age-84 death. [[Glasgow-1623|James Glasgow]], the 1851 groom, remains a separate working profile while the one-man and two-man explanations are tested. The existing records do not justify merging them or creating two independently proved fathers named Adam.
Replacement profile20This profile represents the monument-defined son of Adam and Rose and the age-84 death. [[Glasgow-1623|James Glasgow]], the 1851 groom, remains a separate working profile while the one-man and two-man explanations are tested. The existing records do not justify merging them or creating two independently proved fathers named Adam.
Current profile21
Replacement profile21
Current profile22==== Unproved associates ====
Replacement profile22==== Unproved associates ====
Current profile23Henry Glasgow must not be attached as James's son merely because he informed the death. The later valuation sequence from James to Rose Anne and then Adam shows occupancy succession at Inishrush plot 29, not inheritance or kinship.
Replacement profile23Henry Glasgow must not be attached as James's son merely because he informed the death. The later valuation sequence from James to Rose Anne and then Adam shows occupancy succession at Inishrush plot 29, not inheritance or kinship.
Current profile24
Replacement profile24
Current profile25A 20 March 1847 family letter reported that a James Glasgow had a child by a servant who was a daughter of Henry Barkly.<ref name="Letter1847">[https://www.hiltner.com/mckeown/documents/John%20Glasgow%20letter%20to%20Jane%20Glasgow%20Gray%203-20-1847.pdf John Glasgow to Jane Glasgow Gray], 20 March 1847.</ref> The 1851 James-and-Rosanna marriage is the closer documentary match. The letter does not name or sex the child, and the child should not be attached to this older James.
Replacement profile25A 20 March 1847 family letter reported that a James Glasgow had a child by a servant who was a daughter of Henry Barkly.<ref name="Letter1847">[https://www.hiltner.com/mckeown/documents/John%20Glasgow%20letter%20to%20Jane%20Glasgow%20Gray%203-20-1847.pdf John Glasgow to Jane Glasgow Gray], 20 March 1847.</ref> The 1851 James-and-Rosanna marriage is the closer documentary match. The letter does not name or sex the child, and the child should not be attached to this older James.
Current profile26
Replacement profile26
Current profile27First Kilrea Presbyterian's 1828 register identifies Jane Barklie, daughter of Henry Barkly and Jane Galloway, marrying Peter Aikin. Henry's 1831 Tyanee household contained four females. This establishes a Barkly household in the relevant locality, but it does not identify Jane—or any particular daughter—as the servant in the letter.<ref name="BarklyContext">[https://genealogy.torrens.org/BannValley/church/KilreaP1/Marriages/1828.html First Kilrea Presbyterian marriage transcription], Peter Aikin and Jane Barklie, 1828; [https://genealogy.torrens.org/BannValley/church/Tamlaght/1831census_3.html Tamlaght O'Crilly 1831 census transcription], Henry Barkley at Tyanee; and [https://www.billmacafee.com/1831census/1831derrycensusnames.pdf William Macafee, ''Names of Householders Listed in the 1831 Census Returns for the County of Londonderry''].</ref>
Replacement profile27First Kilrea Presbyterian's 1828 register identifies Jane Barklie, daughter of Henry Barkly and Jane Galloway, marrying Peter Aikin. Henry's 1831 Tyanee household contained four females. This establishes a Barkly household in the relevant locality, but it does not identify Jane—or any particular daughter—as the servant in the letter.<ref name="BarklyContext">[https://genealogy.torrens.org/BannValley/church/KilreaP1/Marriages/1828.html First Kilrea Presbyterian marriage transcription], Peter Aikin and Jane Barklie, 1828; [https://genealogy.torrens.org/BannValley/church/Tamlaght/1831census_3.html Tamlaght O'Crilly 1831 census transcription], Henry Barkley at Tyanee; and [https://www.billmacafee.com/1831census/1831derrycensusnames.pdf William Macafee, ''Names of Householders Listed in the 1831 Census Returns for the County of Londonderry''].</ref>
Current profile28
Replacement profile28
Current profile29Second Portglenone baptisms survive for 1845–49 under PRONI MIC1P/357, but the relevant pages have not been inspected. First Kilrea session minutes, PRONI MIC1P/87 (1825–1852), and Drimbolg Reformed Presbyterian session minutes, PRONI MIC1C/15 (1809–1859), are separate possible discipline-record targets. No negative conclusion should be drawn before those records are searched.<ref name="ChurchGuide">[https://www.billmacafee.com/churchrecords/churchrecordsderry.pdf William Macafee, ''Church Records for County Londonderry''], register and session-book coverage.</ref>
Replacement profile29Second Portglenone baptisms survive for 1845–49 under PRONI MIC1P/357, but the relevant pages have not been inspected. First Kilrea session minutes, PRONI MIC1P/87 (1825–1852), and Drimbolg Reformed Presbyterian session minutes, PRONI MIC1C/15 (1809–1859), are separate possible discipline-record targets. No negative conclusion should be drawn before those records are searched.<ref name="ChurchGuide">[https://www.billmacafee.com/churchrecords/churchrecordsderry.pdf William Macafee, ''Church Records for County Londonderry''], register and session-book coverage.</ref>
Current profile30
Replacement profile30
Current profile31=== Birth ===
Replacement profile31=== Birth ===
Current profile32
Replacement profile32
Current profile33James's approximate birth year of 1794 is calculated from the age of 84 recorded at his death in December 1878.
Replacement profile33James's approximate birth year of 1794 is calculated from the age of 84 recorded at his death in December 1878.
Current profile34
Replacement profile34
Current profile35No contemporary baptism or birth record has yet been identified.
Replacement profile35No contemporary baptism or birth record has yet been identified.
Current profile36
Replacement profile36
Current profile37=== Parents ===
Replacement profile37=== Parents ===
Current profile38
Replacement profile38
Current profile39The Tamlaght O'Crilly Lower family gravestone explicitly identifies James as a son of Adam and Rose Glasgow.<ref name="Gravestone">“Tamlaght O’Crilly Lower Graveyard,” ''One Irish Rover'', [https://www.oneirishrover.com/tamlaght-graveyard/ Glasgow family gravestone].</ref>
Replacement profile39The Tamlaght O'Crilly Lower family gravestone explicitly identifies James as a son of Adam and Rose Glasgow.<ref name="Gravestone">“Tamlaght O’Crilly Lower Graveyard,” ''One Irish Rover'', [https://www.oneirishrover.com/tamlaght-graveyard/ Glasgow family gravestone].</ref>
Current profile40
Replacement profile40
Current profile41=== Marriage ===
Replacement profile41=== Marriage ===
Current profile42
Replacement profile42
Current profile43James's civil death registration records his marital condition as '''married'''.<ref name="JamesDeath">“Civil Records,” database with images, ''Irish Genealogy'', death of James Glasgow, 12 December 1878, Group Registration ID 5928386, Magherafelt registration district, [https://www.irishgenealogy.ie/view/?record_id=cide-5928386 indexed record] and [https://www.irishgenealogy.ie/files/civil/deaths_returns/deaths_1878/020497/7192875.pdf original civil return].</ref>
Replacement profile43James's civil death registration records his marital condition as '''married'''.<ref name="JamesDeath">“Civil Records,” database with images, ''Irish Genealogy'', death of James Glasgow, 12 December 1878, Group Registration ID 5928386, Magherafelt registration district, [https://www.irishgenealogy.ie/view/?record_id=cide-5928386 indexed record] and [https://www.irishgenealogy.ie/files/civil/deaths_returns/deaths_1878/020497/7192875.pdf original civil return].</ref>
Current profile44
Replacement profile44
Current profile45His wife's identity has not yet been established from the records cited on this profile.
Replacement profile45His wife's identity has not yet been established from the records cited on this profile.
Current profile46
Replacement profile46
Current profile47Rose Anne Glasgow should not be identified as his wife merely because she followed him as occupier of plot 29. She belonged to the family of the younger James Glasgow and was that James's widow.
Replacement profile47Rose Anne Glasgow should not be identified as his wife merely because she followed him as occupier of plot 29. She belonged to the family of the younger James Glasgow and was that James's widow.
Current profile48
Replacement profile48
Current profile49=== Death date ===
Replacement profile49=== Death date ===
Current profile50
Replacement profile50
Current profile51The original civil death return records James's death at Inishrush on '''12 December 1878'''. The death was registered on 23 December 1878 by Henry Glasgow, who was present at the death.<ref name="JamesDeath" />
Replacement profile51The original civil death return records James's death at Inishrush on '''12 December 1878'''. The death was registered on 23 December 1878 by Henry Glasgow, who was present at the death.<ref name="JamesDeath" />
Current profile52
Replacement profile52
Current profile53The family gravestone instead records '''11 December 1878'''.<ref name="Gravestone" />
Replacement profile53The family gravestone instead records '''11 December 1878'''.<ref name="Gravestone" />
Current profile54
Replacement profile54
Current profile55Both sources agree that James died in December 1878 aged 84. The profile uses the date recorded in the civil return while preserving the one-day discrepancy.
Replacement profile55Both sources agree that James died in December 1878 aged 84. The profile uses the date recorded in the civil return while preserving the one-day discrepancy.
Current profile56
Replacement profile56
Current profile57=== Henry Glasgow ===
Replacement profile57=== Henry Glasgow ===
Current profile58
Replacement profile58
Current profile59Henry Glasgow is attached as an '''uncertain''' son of James.
Replacement profile59Henry Glasgow is attached as an '''uncertain''' son of James.
Current profile60
Replacement profile60
Current profile61The 1878 civil death registration places Henry at Inishrush and records him as the person present at James's death. It does not describe Henry as James's son or state any other family relationship.<ref name="JamesDeath" />
Replacement profile61The 1878 civil death registration places Henry at Inishrush and records him as the person present at James's death. It does not describe Henry as James's son or state any other family relationship.<ref name="JamesDeath" />
Current profile62
Replacement profile62
Current profile63Their shared surname, residence and Henry's presence at the death are consistent with a close family relationship, but the death return alone does not prove parentage.
Replacement profile63Their shared surname, residence and Henry's presence at the death are consistent with a close family relationship, but the death return alone does not prove parentage.
Current profile64
Replacement profile64
Current profile65=== Farm continuity ===
Replacement profile65=== Farm continuity ===
Current profile66
Replacement profile66
Current profile67Adam Glasgow's 1833 tithe holding measured 11 Irish or Plantation acres, approximately 17.82 statute acres. James's later valuation plot 29 measured 19 acres 2 roods 10 perches, or 19.5625 statute acres.
Replacement profile67Adam Glasgow's 1833 tithe holding measured 11 Irish or Plantation acres, approximately 17.82 statute acres. James's later valuation plot 29 measured 19 acres 2 roods 10 perches, or 19.5625 statute acres.
Current profile68
Replacement profile68
Current profile69The difference is only 1.7425 statute acres, approximately 9.8 per cent. Together with the proved father-son relationship and continued residence at Inishrush, this strongly supports James having succeeded to substantially the same family farm.
Replacement profile69The difference is only 1.7425 statute acres, approximately 9.8 per cent. Together with the proved father-son relationship and continued residence at Inishrush, this strongly supports James having succeeded to substantially the same family farm.
Current profile70
Replacement profile70
Current profile71It does not establish exact parcel identity. The tithe entry has no map reference linking it directly to valuation plot 29, and the tithe and valuation surveys were made several decades apart for different purposes.
Replacement profile71It does not establish exact parcel identity. The tithe entry has no map reference linking it directly to valuation plot 29, and the tithe and valuation surveys were made several decades apart for different purposes.
Current profile72
Replacement profile72
Current profile73=== Younger James Glasgow, Rosanna Barkley and plot 29 ===
Replacement profile73=== Younger James Glasgow, Rosanna Barkley and plot 29 ===
Current profile74
Replacement profile74
Current profile75Later Inishrush records involve another [[Glasgow-1623|James Glasgow]], treated in the current family reconstruction as this James's nephew.
Replacement profile75Later Inishrush records involve another [[Glasgow-1623|James Glasgow]], treated in the current family reconstruction as this James's nephew.
Current profile76
Replacement profile76
Current profile77A letter written by [[Glasgow-822|John Glasgow]] on 20 March 1847 reported news from Ireland that a James Glasgow had fathered an illegitimate child by a daughter of Henry Barkly.<ref name="JohnLetter">John Glasgow, letter to Jane Glasgow Gray, 20 March 1847, [https://www.hiltner.com/mckeown/documents/John%20Glasgow%20letter%20to%20Jane%20Glasgow%20Gray%203-20-1847.pdf digital image].</ref>
Replacement profile77A letter written by [[Glasgow-822|John Glasgow]] on 20 March 1847 reported news from Ireland that a James Glasgow had fathered an illegitimate child by a daughter of Henry Barkly.<ref name="JohnLetter">John Glasgow, letter to Jane Glasgow Gray, 20 March 1847, [https://www.hiltner.com/mckeown/documents/John%20Glasgow%20letter%20to%20Jane%20Glasgow%20Gray%203-20-1847.pdf digital image].</ref>
Current profile78
Replacement profile78
Current profile79The report should not be assigned to this older James. On 17 March 1851 the younger James Glasgow, a 38-year-old bachelor farmer of Inishrush and son of Adam Glasgow, married '''Rosanna Barkley''', a farm servant of Tyanee and daughter of Henry Barkley.<ref name="JamesBarkleyMarriage">“Civil Records,” marriage of James Glasgow and Rosanna Barkley, 17 March 1851, original civil marriage return.</ref>
Replacement profile79The report should not be assigned to this older James. On 17 March 1851 the younger James Glasgow, a 38-year-old bachelor farmer of Inishrush and son of Adam Glasgow, married '''Rosanna Barkley''', a farm servant of Tyanee and daughter of Henry Barkley.<ref name="JamesBarkleyMarriage">“Civil Records,” marriage of James Glasgow and Rosanna Barkley, 17 March 1851, original civil marriage return.</ref>
Current profile80
Replacement profile80
Current profile81The combination of the names, Rosanna's father, her servant status and the Inishrush–Tyanee locality makes the younger James and Rosanna the much stronger identification for the couple described in the 1847 letter. The reported child remains unidentified.
Replacement profile81The combination of the names, Rosanna's father, her servant status and the Inishrush–Tyanee locality makes the younger James and Rosanna the much stronger identification for the couple described in the 1847 letter. The reported child remains unidentified.
Current profile82
Replacement profile82
Current profile83Rose Anne Glasgow later succeeded the older James as occupier of Inishrush plot 29, with an 1884 valuation annotation. She was the widow of the younger James, not the wife of this older James. Her succession in the valuation should therefore not be interpreted as a widow inheriting directly from this James.
Replacement profile83Rose Anne Glasgow later succeeded the older James as occupier of Inishrush plot 29, with an 1884 valuation annotation. She was the widow of the younger James, not the wife of this older James. Her succession in the valuation should therefore not be interpreted as a widow inheriting directly from this James.
Current profile84
Replacement profile84
Current profile85A later Adam Glasgow replaced Rose Anne as occupier with an 1893 annotation.<ref name="Valuation" /> The valuation entries establish succession in occupation of the farm but do not themselves state the family relationships among the occupants.
Replacement profile85A later Adam Glasgow replaced Rose Anne as occupier with an 1893 annotation.<ref name="Valuation" /> The valuation entries establish succession in occupation of the farm but do not themselves state the family relationships among the occupants.
Current profile86
Replacement profile86
Current profile87Accordingly, neither the 1847 Barkley report nor Rose Anne's succession to plot 29 provides evidence identifying this older James's wife or children.
Replacement profile87Accordingly, neither the 1847 Barkley report nor Rose Anne's succession to plot 29 provides evidence identifying this older James's wife or children.
Current profile88
Replacement profile88
Current profile89=== Further research ===
Replacement profile89=== Further research ===
Current profile90
Replacement profile90
Current profile91Useful records for this James include:
Replacement profile91Useful records for this James include:
Current profile92
Replacement profile92
Current profile93* records identifying his wife;
Replacement profile93* records identifying his wife;
Current profile94* marriage or church records establishing his marriage;
Replacement profile94* marriage or church records establishing his marriage;
Current profile95* records explicitly identifying Henry Glasgow's parents;
Replacement profile95* records explicitly identifying Henry Glasgow's parents;
Current profile96* estate, lease and valuation material clarifying transmission of the Inishrush farm;
Replacement profile96* estate, lease and valuation material clarifying transmission of the Inishrush farm;
Current profile97* records identifying the relationships among the later occupants of plot 29.
Replacement profile97* records identifying the relationships among the later occupants of plot 29.
Current profile98
Replacement profile98
Current profile99Research into the child reported in the 1847 Barkley letter belongs primarily with the younger [[Glasgow-1623|James Glasgow]] and Rosanna Barkley rather than with this profile.
Replacement profile99Research into the child reported in the 1847 Barkley letter belongs primarily with the younger [[Glasgow-1623|James Glasgow]] and Rosanna Barkley rather than with this profile.
Current profile100
Replacement profile100
Current profile101First Kilrea Presbyterian session minutes survive for 1825–1852 under PRONI reference ''MIC1P/87'', and the Drimbolg Reformed Presbyterian session or discipline book survives for 1809–1859 under ''MIC1C/15''. Both cover the period of the reported 1846 event and remain relevant unread sources for the younger James and Barkley research.
Replacement profile101First Kilrea Presbyterian session minutes survive for 1825–1852 under PRONI reference ''MIC1P/87'', and the Drimbolg Reformed Presbyterian session or discipline book survives for 1809–1859 under ''MIC1C/15''. Both cover the period of the reported 1846 event and remain relevant unread sources for the younger James and Barkley research.
Current profile102
Replacement profile102
Current profile103The death of James Glasgow was registered on 12 December 1878 in Magherafelt, aged 84.<ref>[https://geni.nidirect.gov.uk/search/death GRONI civil death index], James Glasgow, 12 December 1878, aged 84, Magherafelt registration district, D/1878/179/1022/7/138.</ref>
Replacement profile103The death of James Glasgow was registered on 12 December 1878 in Magherafelt, aged 84.<ref>[https://geni.nidirect.gov.uk/search/death GRONI civil death index], James Glasgow, 12 December 1878, aged 84, Magherafelt registration district, D/1878/179/1022/7/138.</ref>
Current profile104
Replacement profile104
Current profile105== Sources ==
Replacement profile105== Sources ==
Current profile106<references />
Replacement profile106<references />
Full replacement WikiTree biography
Copy this complete text into the WikiTree biography editor. Removed lines appear red on the left; added lines appear green on the right. Apply any structured vital or relationship correction described in the update separately in WikiTree's data fields.