Glasgow Surname Project

Individual research record

James Glasgow

1794 – 1878-12-11

Glasgow-3903 · 1 mapped association

Inishrush, Tamlaght O’Crilly, County LondonderryInishrush, Tamlaght O’Crilly, County Londonderry

At a glance

Identity & family

Tree links organise the family; documentary status still varies.

1Mapped records
3Close relations
8Evidence items
12Candidate leads
Birth
1794 · Inishrush, Tamlaght O’Crilly, County Londonderry
Death
1878-12-11 · Inishrush, Tamlaght O’Crilly, County Londonderry
Parents
Adam GlasgowconfidentRose (Unknown) Glasgowconfident
Spouses
Not recorded
Children
Henry Glasgow
Gender
Male
WikiTree
Glasgow-3903
Research clusters
Descendants of Unknown Glasgow (before 1740)
Mapped descendants
1

Comparison context

These child positions and checks are the subject details used to rank possible parents below.

Naming sequence used by the parentage model

Paternal grandfather positionHenry Glasgow (1850)
Maternal grandfather positionNot identifiable from dated child profiles
Maternal grandmother positionNot identifiable from dated child profiles
Paternal grandmother positionNot identifiable from dated child profiles

Known-position checks: 0 support · 0 conflict. Ordinals retain unnamed children and recognise reused names.

Estimate and relationship notes
  • The export reports 0 children but 1 named child profiles are recoverable from this export.

Relationship comparison

Potential parents or duplicates

Compare scored leads with the subject details above—not proof.

Higher-signal leadReview carefullyWeak lead

Possible fathers5 leads

Automated fit19/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1767–1851Generation27 years age gapRecorded placesIreland · Guernsey County, Ohio, United States · Drumlamph townlandIndependent clue breadth · 5Age · Household · Spouse · Two-Generation · Undated LocalityExisting-tree context (not an independent clue)Rare Sibling-Name PatternCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 27-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • known spouse Mary Arthur had a plausible maternal age (20) at the subject's birth (+7)
  • candidate has only broad or undated birth-locality overlap: inishrush (+6)

a different father is marked confident (−25; WikiTree: confident parent); candidate already has another child named James Glasgow (Glasgow-1165) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 27-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 83 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1850), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • candidate has only broad or undated birth-locality overlap: inishrush (+6)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • a known child was born within 5 years of the subject (+1)
  • known spouse Mary Arthur had a plausible maternal age (20) at the subject's birth (+7)
  • candidate's other children share uncommon given names with the subject's recorded siblings: Adam +12 (15 public profiles) (+12 total)

Deductions and cautions: a different father is marked confident (−25; WikiTree: confident parent); candidate already has another child named James Glasgow (Glasgow-1165) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict)

Automated fit10/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1766–1836Generation28 years age gapRecorded placesCounty Antrim, Ireland · Cross, Ballymoney, County Antrim, Ireland, United Kingdom · Cross townland, Ballymoney parishIndependent clue breadth · 5Age · Household · Mapped Proximity · Spouse · Two-GenerationExisting-tree context (not an independent clue)Rare Sibling-Name PatternCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 28-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 84 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1850), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • known spouse Jane (McClure) Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (21) at the subject's birth (+3)

a different father is marked confident (−25; WikiTree: confident parent); candidate already has another child named James McClure Glasgow (Glasgow-1780) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 28-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 84 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1850), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • mapped Cross townland, Ballymoney parish is 19.3 km from the subject's birth-period St Nossonus — Tamlaght O'Crilly Lower graveyard (+1; one or both placements are unproved)
  • a known child was born within 5 years of the subject (+1)
  • known spouse Jane (McClure) Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (21) at the subject's birth (+3)
  • candidate's other children share uncommon given names with the subject's recorded siblings: Adam +12 (15 public profiles) (+12 total)

Deductions and cautions: a different father is marked confident (−25; WikiTree: confident parent); candidate already has another child named James McClure Glasgow (Glasgow-1780) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict)

Show 3 lower-scoring possible fathers
Automated fit10/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1760–?Generation34 years age gapRecorded placesScotland · Cookstown, County Tyrone, Ireland · CookstownIndependent clue breadth · 7Age · Common Grandparent Birth-Order Naming · Household · Indirect Multi-Factor Convergence · Mapped Proximity · Rare Branch-Name Recurrence · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 34-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming
  • candidate's birth is 90 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1850), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)

a different father is marked confident (−25; WikiTree: confident parent); candidate already has another child named James Glasgow (Glasgow-1702) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 34-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 90 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1850), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • mapped Cookstown is 29.1 km from the subject's birth-period St Nossonus — Tamlaght O'Crilly Lower graveyard (+1; one or both placements are unproved)
  • a known child was born within 5 years of the subject (+1)
  • uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Henry +8 (24 public profiles; subject branch: Henry Glasgow; candidate branch: Henry McCaw Glasgow) (+8 total)
  • the subject would fill the first son position among the candidate's dated children, and the candidate's linked father James Glasgow shares the subject's common given name (+2; Scottish grandparent-name pattern, James in 224 public profiles; WikiTree: relationship status unmarked; weak alone)
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming

Deductions and cautions: a different father is marked confident (−25; WikiTree: confident parent); candidate already has another child named James Glasgow (Glasgow-1702) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict)

Automated fit4/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1753–?Generation41 years age gapRecorded placesDublinIndependent clue breadth · 3Age · Spouse · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 41-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • known spouse Ann (Duffy) Glasco had a plausible maternal age (38) at the subject's birth (+7)
  • candidate's birth is 97 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1850), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)

a different father is marked confident (−25; WikiTree: confident parent); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 41-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 97 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1850), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • known spouse Ann (Duffy) Glasco had a plausible maternal age (38) at the subject's birth (+7)

Deductions and cautions: a different father is marked confident (−25; WikiTree: confident parent); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Automated fit2/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1776–1866Generation18 years age gapRecorded placesCookstown, Tyrone, Ireland · Cookstown, Tyrone, Ireland, United Kingdom · CookstownIndependent clue breadth · 5Age · Indirect Multi-Factor Convergence · Mapped Proximity · Same-Sex Generational Naming · Two-GenerationExisting-tree context (not an independent clue)Sibling-Household ReplicationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • possible 18-year parent-child age gap (+10)
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming
  • candidate's birth is 74 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1850), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)

a different father is marked confident (−25; WikiTree: confident parent)

Show complete scoring
  • possible 18-year parent-child age gap (+10)
  • candidate's birth is 74 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1850), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • mapped Cookstown is 29.1 km from the subject's birth-period St Nossonus — Tamlaght O'Crilly Lower graveyard (+1; one or both placements are unproved)
  • candidate and subject share the given name James (+4; weak direct parent-child name recurrence, 224 public profiles)
  • the same sex-aware parent-name position recurs independently in sibling households: Adam Glasgow → James Glasgow (+3)
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming

Deductions and cautions: a different father is marked confident (−25; WikiTree: confident parent)

Possible mothers5 leads

Possible Mother

Mary ArthurArthur-2480

Automated fit12/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1774–1859Generation20 years age gapRecorded placesIreland · Londonderry, Guernsey, Ohio, United States · InishrushIndependent clue breadth · 4Age · Household · Two-Generation · Undated LocalityExisting-tree context (not an independent clue)Rare Sibling-Name PatternCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 20-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate has only broad or undated birth-locality overlap: inishrush (+6)
  • candidate's birth is 76 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1850), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)

a different mother is marked confident (−25; WikiTree: confident parent); candidate already has another child named James Glasgow (Glasgow-1165) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 20-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 76 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1850), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • candidate has only broad or undated birth-locality overlap: inishrush (+6)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • a known child was born within 5 years of the subject (+1)
  • candidate's other children share uncommon given names with the subject's recorded siblings: Adam +12 (15 public profiles) (+12 total)

Deductions and cautions: a different mother is marked confident (−25; WikiTree: confident parent); candidate already has another child named James Glasgow (Glasgow-1165) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict)

Automated fit3/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1765–?Generation29 years age gapRecorded placesLocation not supplied — profile holding pointIndependent clue breadth · 3Age · Spouse-Specific Child Window · Two-GenerationSame-spouse child windowWilliam GlasgowCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 29-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 85 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1850), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1783–1802) (+6; other parent William Glasgow)

a different mother is marked confident (−25; WikiTree: confident parent); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 29-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 85 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1850), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1783–1802) (+6; other parent William Glasgow)

Deductions and cautions: a different mother is marked confident (−25; WikiTree: confident parent); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Show 3 lower-scoring possible mothers
Automated fit0/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1788–1877Generationnominally 6 years; approximate dates permit about 15–16 years age gapRecorded placesRockbridge, Virginia, United States · Adams, Ohio, United StatesIndependent clue breadth · 2Age · Two-GenerationExisting-tree context (not an independent clue)Rare Sibling-Name PatternCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • the nominal 6-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (15–16 years) (+4)
  • candidate's birth is 62 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1850), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • candidate's other children share uncommon given names with the subject's recorded siblings: Nancy +3 (49 public profiles) (+3 total)

a different mother is marked confident (−25; WikiTree: confident parent); parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction); candidate is recorded only outside the subject's birth country (−25)

Show complete scoring
  • the nominal 6-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (15–16 years) (+4)
  • candidate's birth is 62 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1850), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • candidate's other children share uncommon given names with the subject's recorded siblings: Nancy +3 (49 public profiles) (+3 total)

Deductions and cautions: a different mother is marked confident (−25; WikiTree: confident parent); parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction); candidate is recorded only outside the subject's birth country (−25)

Automated fit0/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1788–1874Generationnominally 6 years; approximate dates permit about 15–16 years age gapRecorded placesStranraer, Wigtownshire, Scotland, United KingdomIndependent clue breadth · 2Age · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • the nominal 6-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (15–16 years) (+4)
  • candidate's birth is 62 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1850), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)

a different mother is marked confident (−25; WikiTree: confident parent); parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction); candidate is recorded only outside the subject's birth country (−25)

Show complete scoring
  • the nominal 6-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (15–16 years) (+4)
  • candidate's birth is 62 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1850), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)

Deductions and cautions: a different mother is marked confident (−25; WikiTree: confident parent); parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction); candidate is recorded only outside the subject's birth country (−25)

Automated fit0/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1786–1865Generationnominally 8 years; approximate dates permit about 15–18 years age gapRecorded placesIreland · West Deer Township, Allegheny, Pennsylvania, United States · Portglenone — regional family-tradition referenceIndependent clue breadth · 3Age · Mapped Proximity · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • the nominal 8-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (15–18 years) (+4)
  • candidate's birth is 64 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1850), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • mapped Portglenone — regional family-tradition reference is 2.9 km from the subject's birth-period St Nossonus — Tamlaght O'Crilly Lower graveyard (+3; one or both placements are unproved)

a different mother is marked confident (−25; WikiTree: confident parent); parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction)

Show complete scoring
  • the nominal 8-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (15–18 years) (+4)
  • candidate's birth is 64 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1850), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • mapped Portglenone — regional family-tradition reference is 2.9 km from the subject's birth-period St Nossonus — Tamlaght O'Crilly Lower graveyard (+3; one or both placements are unproved)

Deductions and cautions: a different mother is marked confident (−25; WikiTree: confident parent); parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction)

How parent leads are calculated

Automated leads use birth surnames—not married surnames—as parental eligibility, role-specific biological age limits, bounded and approximate-date uncertainty, household chronology, specific time-aware localities, mapped distance, tenancy succession, migration destinations and sex-aware Scottish naming positions across generations. People already attached as the subject's parents stay in the identity summary and are excluded from this alternative-candidate list, regardless of relationship confidence. The main calibration uses clues available on disconnected profiles; existing parent and sibling links are retained as comparison context rather than treated as transferable evidence. Common ordered names and grandparent-to-child echoes receive a small non-zero weight, so a John or James match can support several independent criteria without producing a lead alone. Rare names, repeated bearers and bundles across otherwise distinct branches receive substantially more weight according to catalogue frequency. An exact migration place is weighted by its rarity and repetition across both branches; a shared destination country is worth only one point. Extra weight is added only when at least three independent clue types converge: naming, locality, specific migration, household chronology or collateral networks. Sparse profiles retain a clearly labelled chronology-only fallback instead of disappearing. Countries, states, counties and research clusters do not count as a shared locality, and fallback, broad representative or kin-inferred coordinates are excluded from distance scoring. Shared descendant profiles are removed before branch-name comparison. A candidate already recorded as a parent-in-law is excluded. A confident or independently supported parent is treated as settled; uncertain and unassessed attachments remain open to alternative comparison. A different linked parent, an uncle/aunt or grandparent path, and a matching existing child profile prevent an alternative from being classified as a strong direct-parent lead until the underlying tree conflict or duplicate is resolved. Familiar forms such as Bessie are normalised. Surname remains an eligibility filter worth zero points.

Naming customs, shared farms and occupations are circumstantial. Children, spouses and collateral relatives may be missing, and tree-derived family networks are not independent evidence. Scores rank research leads; they do not prove parentage.

Automated fit58/100
Similar Person
Dates1796–1878PlacesPennsylvania, United States → Crocker, Pulaski, Missouri, United StatesParent comparisonNo shared parent is indexed
Why it may fit
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 2 (+25)
  • same death year (+15)

No indexed conflict

Full comparison detail
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 2 (+25)
  • same death year (+15)

Conflicts: No indexed conflict

Same-name candidate

James GlasgowGlasgow-2577

Automated fit48/100
Similar Person
Dates1793–1875PlacesBlair County, Pennsylvania, United StatesParent comparisonNo shared parent is indexed
Why it may fit
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 1 (+25)
  • death years within 3 (+5)

No indexed conflict

Full comparison detail
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 1 (+25)
  • death years within 3 (+5)

Conflicts: No indexed conflict

How duplicate leads are calculated

Dates are eligibility gates, not merely deductions: chronologically impossible people are excluded. Dates, places, spouses, parent certainty and children's profiles and names are then compared. A high score is a prompt to inspect records, not a merge recommendation.

Open only what you need

Research & records

Latest case researchThe current conclusion from the durable research case file.Updated

Current answer

Glasgow-3903 · updated 2026-08-19

James Glasgow is directly identified as Adam and Rose Glasgow's son by the family gravestone. He is no longer the best identity for the James in the 1847 Barkly-child report. An original 1851 marriage instead proves that the younger James Glasgow-1623, also of Inishrush, married Rosanna Barkley, farm servant of Tyanee and daughter of Henry Barkley—the exact people and relationship described in the report. Do not attach the unnamed child to this older James.

Life and record timelineChronological mapped occurrences and their underlying sources.1 record
Case-file source findingsSource extracts and analysis regenerated from findings.md.1 section(s)

Source findings

Glasgow-3903 · updated 2026-08-19

SourceFindingAssessment
Tamlaght O'Crilly Lower gravestoneThe stone calls James the son of Adam and Rose Glasgow and records his death on 11 December 1878 aged 84.Direct evidence for his parents, approximate birth, and death.
John Glasgow letter, 20 March 1847John said that an Irish letter from R. Mulhollan reported a belief that James Glasgow had an illegitimate heir by his servant, an unnamed daughter of Henry Barkly.Near-contemporary but second-hand. The original 1851 marriage below now identifies a much stronger James and Barkley-daughter couple. The report should not be assigned to this older James.
Original marriage of James Glasgow and Rosanna Barkley, 17 March 1851James Glasgow-1623, 38, bachelor, farmer of Inishrush and son of Adam Glasgow, married Rosanna Barkley, about 25, farm servant of Tyanee and daughter of Henry Barkley.The exact name, father/daughter, servant status and locality match make this younger couple the compelling subjects of the 1847 report. It is exclusionary evidence against assigning the report to Glasgow-3903; the child remains unnamed.
IrishGenealogy indexed record and original civil death returnJames Glasgow, married farmer of Inishrush, reported age 84, died 11 December 1878. Henry Glasgow of Inishrush was present at death.Confirms the gravestone date and residence. The return does not state Henry's relationship; the younger James's marriage removes the former reason for treating Henry as the leading 1847 child candidate.
PRONI valuation revision book `VAL/12/B/34/10D`James was struck out as occupier of Inishrush plot 29; Rose Anne was inserted with an 1884 annotation and later Adam with an 1893 annotation.Direct occupancy succession, not stated kinship.
Irish civil death return for Roseanne GlasgowRoseanne, a farmer's widow aged 65, died at Inishrush on 22 April 1888; daughter Mary informed.Her age and residence now fit Rosanna Barkley Barkley-2097 and the valuation succession may belong to the younger couple, not this James. No inspected record explicitly names Roseanne's husband or maiden surname, so identity remains probable rather than proved.
PRONI Guide to Church Records, Second Portglenone MIC1P/357, and access auditFirst Portglenone baptisms stop in 1846 and resume in 1852. Second Portglenone baptisms survive for 1821-67, including 1845-49. No public image, transcript, or name extract was found; access is onsite PRONI microfilm or Coleraine/CFHS reel 179. Its session minutes begin only in 1881.The probable birth window is covered by a surviving but unread baptism register. RootsIreland and UHF online coverage cannot test it. No baptism or discipline-case negative can be claimed.
Barkly child identity auditCivil, church, grave, land, newspaper, descendant, and same-name searches did not identify the child. A February 1847 Tyanee baptism belongs to Francis Gamble; Barkly is the father's given name in the transcription, reinforced by local Gamble use of Barkley as a given/middle name.Identity unresolved. Francis Gamble is a false lead; later William, Lindsey, Adam, and Mary Glasgows were born too late to be the child already reported in March 1847.
First Kilrea Presbyterian marriage register, 3 December 1828 and 1831 census indexJane Barklie, daughter of Henry Barkly and Jane Galloway of Tyanee, married Peter Aikin. Henry's 1831 Tyanee household contained three males and four females, all Presbyterian.Places a real Henry Barkly household behind the letter. Jane is not identified as the servant; several daughters/females remained possible.
PRONI church records MIC1P/87 and MIC1C/15, identified in the County Londonderry church-record guideFirst Kilrea Presbyterian session minutes survive for 1825–1852; Drimbolg Reformed Presbyterian discipline/session records survive for 1809–1859.Both cover the alleged 1846 event and are specific unread discipline targets. No negative result may be claimed until the originals are inspected.
Evidence assessmentWhat is supported, uncertain or disputed in the current case model.7 claims
4Unknown
2Original
1Derivative
1Tree Only

Documented or strongly supported

James Glasgow was recorded in St Nossonus — Tamlaght O'Crilly Lower graveyard (c.1794).

proved1 linked evidence item

Named on family gravestone

Working hypotheses and conflicts

No claims in this category have been formally assessed.

Research questionsOpen problems, missing bridges and the next records to inspect.4 open

Which records prove the subject's identity across events?

No current conclusion recorded.

Missing bridge: Not specified

Which original or indexed records identify the parents?

No current conclusion recorded.

Missing bridge: A contemporary record explicitly identifying the parent or parents.

Which spouses and children are directly supported by records?

No current conclusion recorded.

Missing bridge: Not specified

What conflicts or same-name conflations must be resolved?

No current conclusion recorded.

Missing bridge: Not specified

Next records to inspect

  1. research assessment — The National Archives of Ireland's source guide (https://titheapplotmentbooks.nationalarchives.ie/search/tab/aboutmore.jsp) explains that tithe acreages are normally in Irish or Plantation measure, equivalent to 1.62 statute acres.
  2. PRONI VAL/12/B/34/10D — Public Record Office of Northern Ireland, Valuation Revision Books, PRONI VAL/12/B/34/10D, Inishrush, plot 29; PRONI database (https://apps.proni.gov.uk/Val12B/Search.aspx).

Case-file priorities and cautions

Do not add as fact

Glasgow-3903 · updated 2026-08-19

  • Do not name adult Henry Glasgow as this James's son from his presence at the death.
  • Do not assign the 1847 report or Roseanne succession to this James now that the

younger James/Rosanna couple provides the precise match.

  • Do not describe the 1847 child as male merely because the letter used heir.
  • Do not identify Francis Gamble as the reported child.

Decisive next records

Glasgow-3903 · updated 2026-08-19

  1. Inspect First Portglenone minister William Kennedy McKay's marriage licences,

PRONI D2594/1, for the 1851 James/Rosanna licence and possible surety detail.

  1. Find a later record explicitly naming Roseanne Glasgow's husband and maiden

surname, and records naming the children of James Glasgow-1623.

  1. Search the complete Drimbolg session book and estate records for a discipline,

maintenance, apprenticeship, or inheritance entry naming the child.

  1. Search First Kilrea Presbyterian session minutes MIC1P/87 and Drimbolg

Reformed Presbyterian MIC1C/15 specifically for James Glasgow, Henry Barkly/Barkley, his daughters, servants, fornication, baptism and maintenance between 1845 and March 1847.

Recommended correction applied

Glasgow-3903 · updated 2026-08-19

Verified live 19 August 2026: the structured death is now the record-proved 11 December 1878, marked certain.

Sources and provenanceStructured citations and source-quality classifications.8 sources
Technical profile and raw captureDataset metadata, machine dossier and captured WikiTree biography.Advanced

WikiTree profile information

Dataset: ONT_Glasco_2026-08-18T16_05.json · generated 2026-08-20

Machine-readable dossier

WikiTree biography, citations and relationship snapshot

Glasgow-3903 was captured 2026-08-18T15:04:41+00:00; WikiTree profile revision 2026-08-10.

Profile location claims

EventDateLocationStatus
birthInishrush, Tamlaght O’Crilly, County LondonderryWikiTree profile field
deathInishrush, Tamlaght O’Crilly, County LondonderryWikiTree profile field

Immediate relationship snapshot

RelationshipPersonWikiTree IDDates and places returned
ParentsAdam GlasgowGlasgow-39021758-00-00 · 1844-06-30 · Tamlaght O'Crilly, County Londonderry, Ireland
ParentsRose GlasgowUnknown-7608901767-00-00 · 1833-07-31 · Inishrush, Tamlaght O’Crilly, County Londonderry
ChildrenHenry GlasgowGlasgow-39851850-00-00 · Inishrush, Tamlaght O’Crilly, County Londonderry · 0000-00-00
SiblingsEliza GlasgowGlasgow-39061790-00-00 · Inishrush, Tamlaght O’Crilly, County Londonderry · 1816-00-00
SiblingsAdam GlasgowGlasgow-16221794-00-00 · County Antrim, Ireland · 0000-00-00
SiblingsNancy KyleGlasgow-39071822-00-00 · Inishrush, Tamlaght O’Crilly, County Londonderry · 0000-00-00

Record-bearing passages

  • Biography James Glasgow was born about 1794, calculated from his reported age of 84 at death. No baptism or other contemporary record has yet been identified giving his exact date or place of birth.
  • He was the son of Adam Glasgow and Rose. The family gravestone at Tamlaght O'Crilly Lower explicitly identifies James as their son. “Tamlaght O’Crilly Lower Graveyard,” One Irish Rover, Glasgow family gravestone (https://www.oneirishrover.com/tamlaght-graveyard/).
  • The original 1833 Tithe Applotment Book records his father Adam Glasgow among the landholders of Inishrush with a gross survey area of 11 Irish or Plantation acres, equivalent to about 17.82 statute acres. Public Record Office of Northern Ireland, Tithe Applotment Book for Tamlaght O'Crilly parish, 5 November 1833, PRONI FIN/5/A/254B, image 20, manuscript folio 16, Inishrush no. 1, Adam Glasgow. The National Archives of Ireland's source guide (https://titheapplotmentbooks.nationalarchives.ie/search/tab/aboutmore.jsp) explains that tithe acreages are normally in Irish or Plantation measure, equivalent to 1.62 statute acres.
  • In the first surviving Valuation Revision Book, James occupied Inishrush plot 29, measuring 19 acres 2 roods 10 perches, or 19.5625 statute acres. Public Record Office of Northern Ireland, Valuation Revision Book, PRONI VAL/12/B/34/10A, Inishrush plot 29, James Glasgow, 1860–1863.
  • James's later holding was therefore only about 1.74 statute acres, or 9.8 per cent, larger than Adam's converted tithe acreage. The close agreement, together with James's proved parentage and continued residence at Inishrush, strongly supports succession of substantially the same family farm. It does not establish identical boundaries because the tithe entry has no map reference and the surveys differed in date, purpose and measurement.
  • James was married. His civil death registration expressly records his marital condition as married. The currently cited records do not identify his wife by name. “Civil Records,” database with images, Irish Genealogy, death of James Glasgow, 12 December 1878, Group Registration ID 5928386, Magherafelt registration district, indexed record (https://www.irishgenealogy.ie/view/?record_id=cide-5928386) and original civil return (https://www.irishgenealogy.ie/files/civil/deaths_returns/deaths_1878/020497/7192875.pdf).
  • James died at Inishrush on 12 December 1878, aged 84. His civil death registration describes him as a married farmer. The recorded cause was old-age debility of three weeks' duration, uncertified, with no medical attendant. Henry Glasgow of Inishrush was present at the death, reported it and made his mark on the registration. The return does not state Henry's relationship to James.
  • The family gravestone instead gives James's death as 11 December 1878, one day earlier than the civil registration.
  • James was later struck out as occupier of Inishrush plot 29. Rose Anne Glasgow was inserted with an 1884 revision annotation, and a later Adam Glasgow replaced Rose Anne with an 1893 annotation. Public Record Office of Northern Ireland, Valuation Revision Books, PRONI VAL/12/B/34/10D, Inishrush, plot 29; PRONI database (https://apps.proni.gov.uk/Val12B/Search.aspx).
  • Rose Anne was not this James's wife. She was the widow of the younger James Glasgow, treated in the current family reconstruction as this James's nephew. Research NotesBirth James's approximate birth year of 1794 is calculated from the age of 84 recorded at his death in December 1878.
  • No contemporary baptism or birth record has yet been identified. Parents The Tamlaght O'Crilly Lower family gravestone explicitly identifies James as a son of Adam and Rose Glasgow. Marriage James's civil death registration records his marital condition as married.
  • His wife's identity has not yet been established from the records cited on this profile.
  • Rose Anne Glasgow should not be identified as his wife merely because she followed him as occupier of plot 29. She belonged to the family of the younger James Glasgow and was that James's widow. Death date The original civil death return records James's death at Inishrush on 12 December 1878. The death was registered on 23 December 1878 by Henry Glasgow, who was present at the death.
  • The family gravestone instead records 11 December 1878.
  • Both sources agree that James died in December 1878 aged 84. The profile uses the date recorded in the civil return while preserving the one-day discrepancy. Henry Glasgow Henry Glasgow is attached as an uncertain son of James.
  • The 1878 civil death registration places Henry at Inishrush and records him as the person present at James's death. It does not describe Henry as James's son or state any other family relationship.
  • Their shared surname, residence and Henry's presence at the death are consistent with a close family relationship, but the death return alone does not prove parentage. Farm continuity Adam Glasgow's 1833 tithe holding measured 11 Irish or Plantation acres, approximately 17.82 statute acres. James's later valuation plot 29 measured 19 acres 2 roods 10 perches, or 19.5625 statute acres.
  • The difference is only 1.7425 statute acres, approximately 9.8 per cent. Together with the proved father-son relationship and continued residence at Inishrush, this strongly supports James having succeeded to substantially the same family farm.
  • It does not establish exact parcel identity. The tithe entry has no map reference linking it directly to valuation plot 29, and the tithe and valuation surveys were made several decades apart for different purposes. Younger James Glasgow, Rosanna Barkley and plot 29 Later Inishrush records involve another James Glasgow, treated in the current family reconstruction as this James's nephew.
  • The report should not be assigned to this older James. On 17 March 1851 the younger James Glasgow, a 38-year-old bachelor farmer of Inishrush and son of Adam Glasgow, married Rosanna Barkley, a farm servant of Tyanee and daughter of Henry Barkley. “Civil Records,” marriage of James Glasgow and Rosanna Barkley, 17 March 1851, original civil marriage return.
  • Rose Anne Glasgow later succeeded the older James as occupier of Inishrush plot 29, with an 1884 valuation annotation. She was the widow of the younger James, not the wife of this older James. Her succession in the valuation should therefore not be interpreted as a widow inheriting directly from this James.
  • A later Adam Glasgow replaced Rose Anne as occupier with an 1893 annotation. The valuation entries establish succession in occupation of the farm but do not themselves state the family relationships among the occupants.
  • Accordingly, neither the 1847 Barkley report nor Rose Anne's succession to plot 29 provides evidence identifying this older James's wife or children. Further research Useful records for this James include:
  • records identifying his wife;

    • marriage or church records establishing his marriage;
    • records explicitly identifying Henry Glasgow's parents;
    • estate, lease and valuation material clarifying transmission of the Inishrush farm;
    • records identifying the relationships among the later occupants of plot 29.
  • First Kilrea Presbyterian session minutes survive for 1825–1852 under PRONI reference `MIC1P/87`, and the Drimbolg Reformed Presbyterian session or discipline book survives for 1809–1859 under `MIC1C/15`. Both cover the period of the reported 1846 event and remain relevant unread sources for the younger James and Barkley research. Sources

Profile source citations

  1. “Tamlaght O’Crilly Lower Graveyard,” One Irish Rover, Glasgow family gravestone (https://www.oneirishrover.com/tamlaght-graveyard/). source link 1
  2. Public Record Office of Northern Ireland, Tithe Applotment Book for Tamlaght O'Crilly parish, 5 November 1833, PRONI FIN/5/A/254B, image 20, manuscript folio 16, Inishrush no. 1, Adam Glasgow. The National Archives of Ireland's source guide (https://titheapplotmentbooks.nationalarchives.ie/search/tab/aboutmore.jsp) explains that tithe acreages are normally in Irish or Plantation measure, equivalent to 1.62 statute acres. source link 1
  3. Public Record Office of Northern Ireland, Valuation Revision Book, PRONI VAL/12/B/34/10A, Inishrush plot 29, James Glasgow, 1860–1863.
  4. “Civil Records,” database with images, Irish Genealogy, death of James Glasgow, 12 December 1878, Group Registration ID 5928386, Magherafelt registration district, indexed record (https://www.irishgenealogy.ie/view/?record_id=cide-5928386) and original civil return (https://www.irishgenealogy.ie/files/civil/deaths_returns/deaths_1878/020497/7192875.pdf). source link 1 source link 2
  5. The family gravestone instead gives James's death as 11 December 1878, one day earlier than the civil registration. James was later struck out as occupier of Inishrush plot 29. Rose Anne Glasgow was inserted with an 1884 revision annotation, and a later Adam Glasgow replaced Rose Anne with an 1893 annotation. Public Record Office of Northern Ireland, Valuation Revision Books, PRONI VAL/12/B/34/10D, Inishrush, plot 29; PRONI database (https://apps.proni.gov.uk/Val12B/Search.aspx). source link 1
  6. Marriage James's civil death registration records his marital condition as married. His wife's identity has not yet been established from the records cited on this profile. Rose Anne Glasgow should not be identified as his wife merely because she followed him as occupier of plot 29. She belonged to the family of the younger James Glasgow and was that James's widow. Death date The original civil death return records James's death at Inishrush on 12 December 1878. The death was registered on 23 December 1878 by Henry Glasgow, who was present at the death. The family gravestone instead records 11 December 1878. Both sources agree that James died in December 1878 aged 84. The profile uses the date recorded in the civil return while preserving the one-day discrepancy. Henry Glasgow Henry Glasgow is attached as an uncertain son of James. The 1878 civil death registration places Henry at Inishrush and records him as the person present at James's death. It does not describe Henry as James's son or state any other family relationship. Their shared surname, residence and Henry's presence at the death are consistent with a close family relationship, but the death return alone does not prove parentage. Farm continuity Adam Glasgow's 1833 tithe holding measured 11 Irish or Plantation acres, approximately 17.82 statute acres. James's later valuation plot 29 measured 19 acres 2 roods 10 perches, or 19.5625 statute acres. The difference is only 1.7425 statute acres, approximately 9.8 per cent. Together with the proved father-son relationship and continued residence at Inishrush, this strongly supports James having succeeded to substantially the same family farm. It does not establish exact parcel identity. The tithe entry has no map reference linking it directly to valuation plot 29, and the tithe and valuation surveys were made several decades apart for different purposes. Younger James Glasgow, Rosanna Barkley and plot 29 Later Inishrush records involve another James Glasgow, treated in the current family reconstruction as this James's nephew. A letter written by John Glasgow on 20 March 1847 reported news from Ireland that a James Glasgow had fathered an illegitimate child by a daughter of Henry Barkly. John Glasgow, letter to Jane Glasgow Gray, 20 March 1847, digital image (https://www.hiltner.com/mckeown/documents/John%20Glasgow%20letter%20to%20Jane%20Glasgow%20Gray%203-20-1847.pdf). source link 1
  7. “Civil Records,” marriage of James Glasgow and Rosanna Barkley, 17 March 1851, original civil marriage return.
Full captured biography text
Biography
James Glasgow was born about 1794, calculated from his reported age of 84 at death. No baptism or other contemporary record has yet been identified giving his exact date or place of birth.

He was the son of Adam Glasgow and Rose. The family gravestone at Tamlaght O'Crilly Lower explicitly identifies James as their son. “Tamlaght O’Crilly Lower Graveyard,” One Irish Rover, Glasgow family gravestone (https://www.oneirishrover.com/tamlaght-graveyard/). 

James was a farmer at Inishrush, County Londonderry.

The original 1833 Tithe Applotment Book records his father Adam Glasgow among the landholders of Inishrush with a gross survey area of 11 Irish or Plantation acres, equivalent to about 17.82 statute acres. Public Record Office of Northern Ireland, Tithe Applotment Book for Tamlaght O'Crilly parish, 5 November 1833, PRONI FIN/5/A/254B, image 20, manuscript folio 16, Inishrush no. 1, Adam Glasgow. The National Archives of Ireland's source guide (https://titheapplotmentbooks.nationalarchives.ie/search/tab/aboutmore.jsp) explains that tithe acreages are normally in Irish or Plantation measure, equivalent to 1.62 statute acres. 

In the first surviving Valuation Revision Book, James occupied Inishrush plot 29, measuring 19 acres 2 roods 10 perches, or 19.5625 statute acres. Public Record Office of Northern Ireland, Valuation Revision Book, PRONI VAL/12/B/34/10A, Inishrush plot 29, James Glasgow, 1860–1863. 

James's later holding was therefore only about 1.74 statute acres, or 9.8 per cent, larger than Adam's converted tithe acreage. The close agreement, together with James's proved parentage and continued residence at Inishrush, strongly supports succession of substantially the same family farm. It does not establish identical boundaries because the tithe entry has no map reference and the surveys differed in date, purpose and measurement.

James was married. His civil death registration expressly records his marital condition as married. The currently cited records do not identify his wife by name. “Civil Records,” database with images, Irish Genealogy, death of James Glasgow, 12 December 1878, Group Registration ID 5928386, Magherafelt registration district, indexed record (https://www.irishgenealogy.ie/view/?record_id=cide-5928386) and original civil return (https://www.irishgenealogy.ie/files/civil/deaths_returns/deaths_1878/020497/7192875.pdf). 

James died at Inishrush on 12 December 1878, aged 84. His civil death registration describes him as a married farmer. The recorded cause was old-age debility of three weeks' duration, uncertified, with no medical attendant. Henry Glasgow of Inishrush was present at the death, reported it and made his mark on the registration. The return does not state Henry's relationship to James. 

The family gravestone instead gives James's death as 11 December 1878, one day earlier than the civil registration. 

James was later struck out as occupier of Inishrush plot 29. Rose Anne Glasgow was inserted with an 1884 revision annotation, and a later Adam Glasgow replaced Rose Anne with an 1893 annotation. Public Record Office of Northern Ireland, Valuation Revision Books, PRONI VAL/12/B/34/10D, Inishrush, plot 29; PRONI database (https://apps.proni.gov.uk/Val12B/Search.aspx). 

Rose Anne was not this James's wife. She was the widow of the younger James Glasgow, treated in the current family reconstruction as this James's nephew.
Research NotesBirth
James's approximate birth year of 1794 is calculated from the age of 84 recorded at his death in December 1878.

No contemporary baptism or birth record has yet been identified.
Parents
The Tamlaght O'Crilly Lower family gravestone explicitly identifies James as a son of Adam and Rose Glasgow. 
Marriage
James's civil death registration records his marital condition as married. 

His wife's identity has not yet been established from the records cited on this profile.

Rose Anne Glasgow should not be identified as his wife merely because she followed him as occupier of plot 29. She belonged to the family of the younger James Glasgow and was that James's widow.
Death date
The original civil death return records James's death at Inishrush on 12 December 1878. The death was registered on 23 December 1878 by Henry Glasgow, who was present at the death. 

The family gravestone instead records 11 December 1878. 

Both sources agree that James died in December 1878 aged 84. The profile uses the date recorded in the civil return while preserving the one-day discrepancy.
Henry Glasgow
Henry Glasgow is attached as an uncertain son of James.

The 1878 civil death registration places Henry at Inishrush and records him as the person present at James's death. It does not describe Henry as James's son or state any other family relationship. 

Their shared surname, residence and Henry's presence at the death are consistent with a close family relationship, but the death return alone does not prove parentage.
Farm continuity
Adam Glasgow's 1833 tithe holding measured 11 Irish or Plantation acres, approximately 17.82 statute acres. James's later valuation plot 29 measured 19 acres 2 roods 10 perches, or 19.5625 statute acres.

The difference is only 1.7425 statute acres, approximately 9.8 per cent. Together with the proved father-son relationship and continued residence at Inishrush, this strongly supports James having succeeded to substantially the same family farm.

It does not establish exact parcel identity. The tithe entry has no map reference linking it directly to valuation plot 29, and the tithe and valuation surveys were made several decades apart for different purposes.
Younger James Glasgow, Rosanna Barkley and plot 29
Later Inishrush records involve another James Glasgow, treated in the current family reconstruction as this James's nephew.

A letter written by John Glasgow on 20 March 1847 reported news from Ireland that a James Glasgow had fathered an illegitimate child by a daughter of Henry Barkly. John Glasgow, letter to Jane Glasgow Gray, 20 March 1847, digital image (https://www.hiltner.com/mckeown/documents/John%20Glasgow%20letter%20to%20Jane%20Glasgow%20Gray%203-20-1847.pdf). 

The report should not be assigned to this older James. On 17 March 1851 the younger James Glasgow, a 38-year-old bachelor farmer of Inishrush and son of Adam Glasgow, married Rosanna Barkley, a farm servant of Tyanee and daughter of Henry Barkley. “Civil Records,” marriage of James Glasgow and Rosanna Barkley, 17 March 1851, original civil marriage return. 

The combination of the names, Rosanna's father, her servant status and the Inishrush–Tyanee locality makes the younger James and Rosanna the much stronger identification for the couple described in the 1847 letter. The reported child remains unidentified.

Rose Anne Glasgow later succeeded the older James as occupier of Inishrush plot 29, with an 1884 valuation annotation. She was the widow of the younger James, not the wife of this older James. Her succession in the valuation should therefore not be interpreted as a widow inheriting directly from this James.

A later Adam Glasgow replaced Rose Anne as occupier with an 1893 annotation. The valuation entries establish succession in occupation of the farm but do not themselves state the family relationships among the occupants.

Accordingly, neither the 1847 Barkley report nor Rose Anne's succession to plot 29 provides evidence identifying this older James's wife or children.
Further research
Useful records for this James include:

* records identifying his wife;
* marriage or church records establishing his marriage;
* records explicitly identifying Henry Glasgow's parents;
* estate, lease and valuation material clarifying transmission of the Inishrush farm;
* records identifying the relationships among the later occupants of plot 29.

Research into the child reported in the 1847 Barkley letter belongs primarily with the younger James Glasgow and Rosanna Barkley rather than with this profile.

First Kilrea Presbyterian session minutes survive for 1825–1852 under PRONI reference `MIC1P/87`, and the Drimbolg Reformed Presbyterian session or discipline book survives for 1809–1859 under `MIC1C/15`. Both cover the period of the reported 1846 event and remain relevant unread sources for the younger James and Barkley research.
Sources
Raw WikiTree biography markup
== Biography ==

'''James Glasgow''' was born about 1794, calculated from his reported age of 84 at death. No baptism or other contemporary record has yet been identified giving his exact date or place of birth.

He was the son of [[Glasgow-3902|Adam Glasgow]] and [[Unknown-760890|Rose]]. The family gravestone at Tamlaght O'Crilly Lower explicitly identifies James as their son.<ref name="Gravestone">“Tamlaght O’Crilly Lower Graveyard,” ''One Irish Rover'', [https://www.oneirishrover.com/tamlaght-graveyard/ Glasgow family gravestone].</ref>

James was a farmer at Inishrush, County Londonderry.

The original 1833 Tithe Applotment Book records his father Adam Glasgow among the landholders of Inishrush with a gross survey area of 11 Irish or Plantation acres, equivalent to about 17.82 statute acres.<ref name="AdamTithe">Public Record Office of Northern Ireland, ''Tithe Applotment Book for Tamlaght O'Crilly parish'', 5 November 1833, PRONI FIN/5/A/254B, image 20, manuscript folio 16, Inishrush no. 1, Adam Glasgow. The [https://titheapplotmentbooks.nationalarchives.ie/search/tab/aboutmore.jsp National Archives of Ireland's source guide] explains that tithe acreages are normally in Irish or Plantation measure, equivalent to 1.62 statute acres.</ref>

In the first surviving Valuation Revision Book, James occupied Inishrush plot 29, measuring 19 acres 2 roods 10 perches, or 19.5625 statute acres.<ref name="JamesPlot29">Public Record Office of Northern Ireland, ''Valuation Revision Book'', PRONI VAL/12/B/34/10A, Inishrush plot 29, James Glasgow, 1860–1863.</ref>

James's later holding was therefore only about 1.74 statute acres, or 9.8 per cent, larger than Adam's converted tithe acreage. The close agreement, together with James's proved parentage and continued residence at Inishrush, strongly supports succession of substantially the same family farm. It does not establish identical boundaries because the tithe entry has no map reference and the surveys differed in date, purpose and measurement.

James was '''married'''. His civil death registration expressly records his marital condition as married. The currently cited records do not identify his wife by name.<ref name="JamesDeath">“Civil Records,” database with images, ''Irish Genealogy'', death of James Glasgow, 12 December 1878, Group Registration ID 5928386, Magherafelt registration district, [https://www.irishgenealogy.ie/view/?record_id=cide-5928386 indexed record] and [https://www.irishgenealogy.ie/files/civil/deaths_returns/deaths_1878/020497/7192875.pdf original civil return].</ref>

James died at Inishrush on '''12 December 1878''', aged 84. His civil death registration describes him as a married farmer. The recorded cause was old-age debility of three weeks' duration, uncertified, with no medical attendant. Henry Glasgow of Inishrush was present at the death, reported it and made his mark on the registration. The return does not state Henry's relationship to James.<ref name="JamesDeath" />

The family gravestone instead gives James's death as '''11 December 1878''', one day earlier than the civil registration.<ref name="Gravestone" />

James was later struck out as occupier of Inishrush plot 29. Rose Anne Glasgow was inserted with an 1884 revision annotation, and a later Adam Glasgow replaced Rose Anne with an 1893 annotation.<ref name="Valuation">Public Record Office of Northern Ireland, ''Valuation Revision Books'', PRONI VAL/12/B/34/10D, Inishrush, plot 29; [https://apps.proni.gov.uk/Val12B/Search.aspx PRONI database].</ref>

Rose Anne was not this James's wife. She was the widow of the younger [[Glasgow-1623|James Glasgow]], treated in the current family reconstruction as this James's nephew.

== Research Notes ==

=== Birth ===

James's approximate birth year of 1794 is calculated from the age of 84 recorded at his death in December 1878.

No contemporary baptism or birth record has yet been identified.

=== Parents ===

The Tamlaght O'Crilly Lower family gravestone explicitly identifies James as a son of Adam and Rose Glasgow.<ref name="Gravestone" />

=== Marriage ===

James's civil death registration records his marital condition as '''married'''.<ref name="JamesDeath" />

His wife's identity has not yet been established from the records cited on this profile.

Rose Anne Glasgow should not be identified as his wife merely because she followed him as occupier of plot 29. She belonged to the family of the younger James Glasgow and was that James's widow.

=== Death date ===

The original civil death return records James's death at Inishrush on '''12 December 1878'''. The death was registered on 23 December 1878 by Henry Glasgow, who was present at the death.<ref name="JamesDeath" />

The family gravestone instead records '''11 December 1878'''.<ref name="Gravestone" />

Both sources agree that James died in December 1878 aged 84. The profile uses the date recorded in the civil return while preserving the one-day discrepancy.

=== Henry Glasgow ===

Henry Glasgow is attached as an '''uncertain''' son of James.

The 1878 civil death registration places Henry at Inishrush and records him as the person present at James's death. It does not describe Henry as James's son or state any other family relationship.<ref name="JamesDeath" />

Their shared surname, residence and Henry's presence at the death are consistent with a close family relationship, but the death return alone does not prove parentage.

=== Farm continuity ===

Adam Glasgow's 1833 tithe holding measured 11 Irish or Plantation acres, approximately 17.82 statute acres. James's later valuation plot 29 measured 19 acres 2 roods 10 perches, or 19.5625 statute acres.

The difference is only 1.7425 statute acres, approximately 9.8 per cent. Together with the proved father-son relationship and continued residence at Inishrush, this strongly supports James having succeeded to substantially the same family farm.

It does not establish exact parcel identity. The tithe entry has no map reference linking it directly to valuation plot 29, and the tithe and valuation surveys were made several decades apart for different purposes.

=== Younger James Glasgow, Rosanna Barkley and plot 29 ===

Later Inishrush records involve another [[Glasgow-1623|James Glasgow]], treated in the current family reconstruction as this James's nephew.

A letter written by [[Glasgow-822|John Glasgow]] on 20 March 1847 reported news from Ireland that a James Glasgow had fathered an illegitimate child by a daughter of Henry Barkly.<ref name="JohnLetter">John Glasgow, letter to Jane Glasgow Gray, 20 March 1847, [https://www.hiltner.com/mckeown/documents/John%20Glasgow%20letter%20to%20Jane%20Glasgow%20Gray%203-20-1847.pdf digital image].</ref>

The report should not be assigned to this older James. On 17 March 1851 the younger James Glasgow, a 38-year-old bachelor farmer of Inishrush and son of Adam Glasgow, married '''Rosanna Barkley''', a farm servant of Tyanee and daughter of Henry Barkley.<ref name="JamesBarkleyMarriage">“Civil Records,” marriage of James Glasgow and Rosanna Barkley, 17 March 1851, original civil marriage return.</ref>

The combination of the names, Rosanna's father, her servant status and the Inishrush–Tyanee locality makes the younger James and Rosanna the much stronger identification for the couple described in the 1847 letter. The reported child remains unidentified.

Rose Anne Glasgow later succeeded the older James as occupier of Inishrush plot 29, with an 1884 valuation annotation. She was the widow of the younger James, not the wife of this older James. Her succession in the valuation should therefore not be interpreted as a widow inheriting directly from this James.

A later Adam Glasgow replaced Rose Anne as occupier with an 1893 annotation.<ref name="Valuation" /> The valuation entries establish succession in occupation of the farm but do not themselves state the family relationships among the occupants.

Accordingly, neither the 1847 Barkley report nor Rose Anne's succession to plot 29 provides evidence identifying this older James's wife or children.

=== Further research ===

Useful records for this James include:

* records identifying his wife;
* marriage or church records establishing his marriage;
* records explicitly identifying Henry Glasgow's parents;
* estate, lease and valuation material clarifying transmission of the Inishrush farm;
* records identifying the relationships among the later occupants of plot 29.

Research into the child reported in the 1847 Barkley letter belongs primarily with the younger [[Glasgow-1623|James Glasgow]] and Rosanna Barkley rather than with this profile.

First Kilrea Presbyterian session minutes survive for 1825–1852 under PRONI reference `MIC1P/87`, and the Drimbolg Reformed Presbyterian session or discipline book survives for 1809–1859 under `MIC1C/15`. Both cover the period of the reported 1846 event and remain relevant unread sources for the younger James and Barkley research.

== Sources ==

<references />