Individual research record
James Glasgow
1737 – 1802
Glasgow-1509 · 3 mapped associations
At a glance
Identity & family
Tree links organise the family; documentary status still varies.
- Birth
- 1737 · County Antrim, Ireland
- Death
- 1802 · Place not recorded
- Parents
- William GlasgowuncertainHugh Glasgowuncertain
- Spouses
- Janet Shutter
- Children
- James GlasgowWilliam Glasgow
- Gender
- Male
- WikiTree
- Glasgow-1509
- Research clusters
- East Antrim/Kilwaughter cluster
- Mapped descendants
- 5
Comparison context
These child positions and checks are the subject details used to rank possible parents below.
Naming sequence used by the parentage model
Known-position checks: 0 support · 0 conflict. Ordinals retain unnamed children and recognise reused names.
Estimate and relationship notes
- The export reports 1 children but 2 named child profiles are recoverable from this export.
Relationship comparison
Potential parents or duplicates
Compare scored leads with the subject details above—not proof.
Possible fathers5 leads
Possible Father
William GlasgowGlasgow-428
- possible 52-year parent-child age gap (+10)
- known spouse Susannah (Dauge) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (22) at the subject's birth (+7)
- candidate's birth is 78 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1763), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)
Show complete scoring
- possible 52-year parent-child age gap (+10)
- candidate's birth is 78 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1763), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1726–1744) (+6; other parent Susannah (Dauge) Glasgow)
- known spouse Susannah (Dauge) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (22) at the subject's birth (+7)
- candidate's name matches the first dated son William Glasgow, the expected father position for a male subject (+4; catalogue rarity 0, William in 223 profiles)
Deductions and cautions: a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)
Possible Father
Hugh GlasgowGlasgow-548
- plausible 31-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 57 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1763), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- known spouse Margaret McCullough had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (22) at the subject's birth (+3)
a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)
Show complete scoring
- plausible 31-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 57 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1763), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1735–1739) (+6; other parent Margaret McCullough)
- known spouse Margaret McCullough had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (22) at the subject's birth (+3)
- candidate's other children share uncommon given names with the subject's recorded siblings: Hugh +3 (36 public profiles) (+3 total)
Deductions and cautions: a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)
Show 3 lower-scoring possible fathers
Possible Father
James GlasgowGlasgow-1025
- plausible 37-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 63 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1763), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- a known child was born within 2 years of the subject (+3)
a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10); candidate already has another child named James Glasgow II (Glasgow-1024) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict)
Show complete scoring
- plausible 37-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 63 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1763), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- a known child was born within 2 years of the subject (+3)
- candidate and subject share the given name James (+4; weak direct parent-child name recurrence, 224 public profiles)
- candidate's name matches the first dated son James Glasgow, the expected father position for a male subject (+4; catalogue rarity 0, James in 224 profiles)
Deductions and cautions: a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10); candidate already has another child named James Glasgow II (Glasgow-1024) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict)
Possible Father
Hugh GlasgowGlasgow-1929
- plausible 27-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- known spouse Margaret (McEachin) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (26) at the subject's birth (+7)
- candidate's birth is 53 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1763), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); candidate is recorded only outside the subject's birth country (−25)
Show complete scoring
- plausible 27-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 53 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1763), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1735–1755) (+6; other parent Margaret (McEachin) Glasgow)
- known spouse Margaret (McEachin) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (26) at the subject's birth (+7)
- candidate's other children share uncommon given names with the subject's recorded siblings: Hugh +3 (36 public profiles); Jean +3 (42 public profiles) (+6 total)
Deductions and cautions: a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); candidate is recorded only outside the subject's birth country (−25)
Possible Father
James Glasgow IIGlasgow-1024
- possible 16-year parent-child age gap (+10)
- candidate's birth is 42 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1763), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1735–1750) (+6; other parent Mary (Harkness) Glasgow)
a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10); candidate already has another child named James Glasgow (Glasgow-3305) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict)
Show complete scoring
- possible 16-year parent-child age gap (+10)
- candidate's birth is 42 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1763), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1735–1750) (+6; other parent Mary (Harkness) Glasgow)
- candidate and subject share the given name James (+4; weak direct parent-child name recurrence, 224 public profiles)
- candidate's name matches the first dated son James Glasgow, the expected father position for a male subject (+4; catalogue rarity 0, James in 224 profiles)
Deductions and cautions: a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10); candidate already has another child named James Glasgow (Glasgow-3305) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict)
Possible mothers5 leads
Possible Mother
Ann GlasgowUnknown-763010
- candidate is already linked as parent of 5 exact subject sibling profiles (+32): Jean Glasgow, Rose Glasgow, Mary Glasgow, Hugh Glasgow, James Glasgow
- plausible 26-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 52 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1763), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
candidate already has another child named James Glasgow (Glasgow-3991) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict)
Show complete scoring
- candidate is the spouse of the linked opposite-sex parent (+8; tree couple clue)
- plausible 26-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 52 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1763), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- weak broad-area overlap: antrim (+1; not a locality match)
- subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1731–1748) (+6; other parent Hugh Glasgow)
- candidate is already linked as parent of 5 exact subject sibling profiles (+32): Jean Glasgow, Rose Glasgow, Mary Glasgow, Hugh Glasgow, James Glasgow
- the candidate and the subject's linked father Hugh Glasgow are jointly recorded as parents of 5 exact sibling profiles (+14; strong couple-structure clue)
Deductions and cautions: candidate already has another child named James Glasgow (Glasgow-3991) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict)
Possible Mother
Sarah (Murray) GlasgowMurray-20395
- plausible 27-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming
- candidate's birth is 53 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1763), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required
Show complete scoring
- plausible 27-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 53 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1763), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- mapped Kilwaughter is 5.6 km from the subject's birth-period New Town — Larne (+2; one or both placements are unproved)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
- subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1728–1740) (+6; other parent James Glasgow)
- a candidate spouse matches the first dated son James Glasgow, the expected father position (+3; James in 224 profiles)
- candidate's other children share uncommon given names with the subject's recorded siblings: Jean +3 (42 public profiles) (+3 total)
- 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming
Deductions and cautions: No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required
Show 3 lower-scoring possible mothers
Possible Mother
Margaret McCulloughMcCullough-1964
- plausible 22-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 48 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1763), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1735–1739) (+6; other parent Hugh Glasgow)
locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)
Show complete scoring
- plausible 22-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 48 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1763), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1735–1739) (+6; other parent Hugh Glasgow)
- candidate's other children share uncommon given names with the subject's recorded siblings: Hugh +3 (36 public profiles) (+3 total)
- the candidate's own child family has 2 known-position naming matches (+3; branch-level validation)
Deductions and cautions: locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)
Possible Mother
Margaret (McEachin) GlasgowMcEachin-120
- plausible 26-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 52 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1763), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1735–1755) (+6; other parent Hugh Glasgow)
candidate is recorded only outside the subject's birth country (−25)
Show complete scoring
- plausible 26-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 52 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1763), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1735–1755) (+6; other parent Hugh Glasgow)
- candidate's other children share uncommon given names with the subject's recorded siblings: Hugh +3 (36 public profiles); Jean +3 (42 public profiles) (+6 total)
Deductions and cautions: candidate is recorded only outside the subject's birth country (−25)
Possible Mother
Susannah (Dauge) GlasgowDauge-19
- plausible 22-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 48 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1763), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1726–1744) (+6; other parent William Glasgow)
candidate is recorded only outside the subject's birth country (−25)
Show complete scoring
- plausible 22-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 48 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1763), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1726–1744) (+6; other parent William Glasgow)
- a candidate spouse matches the first dated son William Glasgow, the expected father position (+3; William in 223 profiles)
Deductions and cautions: candidate is recorded only outside the subject's birth country (−25)
How parent leads are calculated
Automated leads use birth surnames—not married surnames—as parental eligibility, role-specific biological age limits, bounded and approximate-date uncertainty, household chronology, specific time-aware localities, mapped distance, tenancy succession, migration destinations and sex-aware Scottish naming positions across generations. People already attached as the subject's parents stay in the identity summary and are excluded from this alternative-candidate list, regardless of relationship confidence. The main calibration uses clues available on disconnected profiles; existing parent and sibling links are retained as comparison context rather than treated as transferable evidence. Common ordered names and grandparent-to-child echoes receive a small non-zero weight, so a John or James match can support several independent criteria without producing a lead alone. Rare names, repeated bearers and bundles across otherwise distinct branches receive substantially more weight according to catalogue frequency. An exact migration place is weighted by its rarity and repetition across both branches; a shared destination country is worth only one point. Extra weight is added only when at least three independent clue types converge: naming, locality, specific migration, household chronology or collateral networks. Sparse profiles retain a clearly labelled chronology-only fallback instead of disappearing. Countries, states, counties and research clusters do not count as a shared locality, and fallback, broad representative or kin-inferred coordinates are excluded from distance scoring. Shared descendant profiles are removed before branch-name comparison. A candidate already recorded as a parent-in-law is excluded. A confident or independently supported parent is treated as settled; uncertain and unassessed attachments remain open to alternative comparison. A different linked parent, an uncle/aunt or grandparent path, and a matching existing child profile prevent an alternative from being classified as a strong direct-parent lead until the underlying tree conflict or duplicate is resolved. Familiar forms such as Bessie are normalised. Surname remains an eligibility filter worth zero points.
Naming customs, shared farms and occupations are circumstantial. Children, spouses and collateral relatives may be missing, and tree-derived family networks are not independent evidence. Scores rank research leads; they do not prove parentage.
Same-name candidate
James GlasgowGlasgow-1504
- same first and last name (+18)
- shared recorded place (+20)
- matching child name: William Glasgow
record-derived birth estimates differ by 30; retained without deduction; uncertain father attachments differ (no deduction)
Full comparison detail
- same first and last name (+18)
- shared recorded place (+20)
- matching child name: William Glasgow
Conflicts: record-derived birth estimates differ by 30; retained without deduction; uncertain father attachments differ (no deduction)
Same-name candidate
James GlasgowGlasgow-634
- same first and last name (+18)
- birth years within 2 (+25)
- matching child name: James Glasgow
unassessed father attachments differ (−5)
Full comparison detail
- same first and last name (+18)
- birth years within 2 (+25)
- matching child name: James Glasgow
Conflicts: unassessed father attachments differ (−5)
How duplicate leads are calculated
Dates are eligibility gates, not merely deductions: chronologically impossible people are excluded. Dates, places, spouses, parent certainty and children's profiles and names are then compared. A high score is a prompt to inspect records, not a merge recommendation.
Open only what you need
Research & records
Latest case researchThe current conclusion from the durable research case file.Updated
Current conclusion
This profile is the working identity for the older Larne ropemaker/roper, not the monument son of Hugh and Ann now represented separately by James Glasgow (Glasgow-3991). It is also already separate from James Glasgow-1504, the c.1707 husband of Sarah Murray. The catalogue must not describe 1504 and 1509 as a conflated profile. The 1803 Connor probate is a plausible match to a James reportedly commemorated as 1737-1802 with Janet Shutter, but neither the complete monument nor probate contents has been recovered.
The derivative congregation chronology records a James under Hugh in 1737. That man is chronologically capable of establishing a ropewalk in 1761, but the original entry has not been inspected. The current uncertain placement under William Glasgow-1505 is also chronologically plausible but lacks a direct father-son record. These are competing hypotheses; neither is presently preferred strongly enough to remove a useful uncertain attachment.
James Glasgow, ropemaker, is independently documented at Larne in newspaper advertisements in 1761 and as a deed witness in 1766. A 1786 lease names James Glasgow, tanner, at Larne. These may be the same James, but the occupation change means identity should remain cautious. Alexander Holmes's 1799 will refers to houses occupied by James Glasgow, apparently a roper, proving that a Larne namesake remained there after James-1144 had died in South Carolina.
The reported 1762 marriage to Janet Shutter and their parentage of William Glasgow-3324 are probable, not proved. William's daughter Jane Shutter Glasgow supplies unusually specific circumstantial support. James Glasgow-3986, born about 1773, is a plausible later son and may explain why his former direct attachment to the much older William-1505 looked generationally compressed.
Life and record timelineChronological mapped occurrences and their underlying sources.3 records
Child of Hugh Glasgow at New Town / Larne
The derivative congregation-register chronology records James in Hugh's New Town household in 1737; later occupation and probate evidence is separately mapped.
Source and mapping detail
Larne/Kilwaughter congregation register chronology
Candidate matched on record type, year, place; inspect before treating it as the underlying record.
Precision: Settlement centrepoint
Registry of Deeds memorial 204122
Named as a ropemaker of Larne in an assignment registered in 1775.
Source and mapping detail
Candidate matched on record type, year; inspect before treating it as the underlying record.
Precision: Settlement centrepoint
Belfast probate; residence Larne
James-1509 reportedly died in 1802; probate in 1803 at Larne is a strong fit.
Source and mapping detail
WikiTree profile export for Glasgow-1509
Candidate matched on record type, year, place; inspect before treating it as the underlying record.
Precision: Settlement centrepoint
Case-file source findingsSource extracts and analysis regenerated from findings.md.1 section(s)
Source findings
| Source | Finding | Assessment |
|---|---|---|
| Connor probate-index transcription, 1803; searchable through PRONI Name Search | James Glasgow, Larne, 1803. | Plausible match to the Larne man reported dead in 1802; the index names no relatives or occupation. |
| Reported St Cedma's memorial | James Glasgow, 1737–1802, with wife Janet Shutter. | Strong identity framework, but an image or full transcription should be cited. |
| Larne/Kilwaughter congregational timeline | A James, son of Hugh Glasgow, was recorded at New Town/Larne in 1737. | Probable match; use the original or a reliable full transcription before making parentage certain. |
| *Belfast News-Letter*, 2 and 16 January 1761 | Advertisements report that James Glasgow, ropemaker from Belfast, had erected a rope-walk at Larne. | Direct occupation/residence if the newspaper text is confirmed; exact identity not stated. |
| Registry memorial 204122, deed 14 May 1766 | James Glasgow, ropemaker of Larne, witnessed the deed and memorial. | Direct occupation and residence; no kinship. |
PRONI D2977/3A/4/25/13, 1 November 1786 | Lease to James Glasgow, tanner of Larne, for about five acres at Blackcave. | Direct occupation/residence; probably this profile, but not uniquely identified. |
| Alexander Holmes will transcription, will dated 5 June 1799; Registry memorial 345729, vol. 527, p. 136 | Gives Jane Holmes a field held with James Glasgow and Mary Holmes ground rent from houses occupied by James Glasgow, Roper in Old Town, Larne. | Direct local association in a derivative will abstract; likely continuity with the 1761/1766 trade cluster, though a son or successor remains possible. |
| Bigger and Hughes, Larne Parish Churchyard inscriptions, published 1899 | James, explicitly son of Hugh and Ann Glasgow, died 14 April 1812 aged 64; wife Jane died 21 July 1820 aged 79. Their daughter Ann was also commemorated, apparently dying 25 May 1832, although the OCR renders the year inconsistently. | Strong competing direct relationship and chronology. It breaks the assumed identification of Hugh's adult son with a 1737-1802 James married to Janet; Ann's year requires inspection of the plate. |
| Same published inscription, lower Glasgow stone | Jane Shutter Glasgow, daughter of William, died 21 April 1799 aged nine months; William died 5 October 1816 aged 53; wife Elizabeth and daughters Eliza and Mary are also named. | Proves the younger household. The distinctive Shutter name strongly supports, but does not alone prove, William as son of James and Janet Shutter. |
Evidence assessmentWhat is supported, uncertain or disputed in the current case model.10 claims
Documented or strongly supported
James Glasgow was recorded in New Town — Larne (1737).
Child of Hugh Glasgow at New Town / Larne
James Glasgow was recorded in Larne (14 May 1766).
Registry of Deeds memorial 204122
Working hypotheses and conflicts
James Glasgow was recorded in Larne (1803).
Belfast probate; residence Larne
James Glasgow was possible son of Hugh Glasgow
The register chronology records a James in Hugh's New Town/Larne household in 1737, but the original entry has not been inspected and Hugh's monument proves a different son James born about 1747/48. The 1737 man may be the ropemaker, an earlier child, a mistranscription or part of another Hugh household.
James Glasgow was possible son of William Glasgow
William was an adult Larne occupier by 1736 and could be James's father, but no baptism, deed, will or monument states the relationship. The 1737 Hugh entry is a competing hypothesis.
William Glasgow was probable son of James Glasgow
The published Larne monument calls infant Jane Shutter Glasgow William's daughter. This strongly corroborates the derivative 1762 James-Janet marriage and c.1763 William placement, but does not explicitly name William's parents.
James Glasgow was possible son of James Glasgow
Birth about eleven years after the reported James-Janet marriage fits naturally and avoids the roughly 65-year gap created by direct placement under William-1505. No direct child record or complete shared monument has been recovered.
Research questionsOpen problems, missing bridges and the next records to inspect.4 open
Which records prove the subject's identity across events?
No current conclusion recorded.
Missing bridge: Not specified
Which original or indexed records identify the parents?
No current conclusion recorded.
Missing bridge: A contemporary record explicitly identifying the parent or parents.
Which spouses and children are directly supported by records?
No current conclusion recorded.
Missing bridge: Not specified
What conflicts or same-name conflations must be resolved?
No current conclusion recorded.
Missing bridge: Not specified
Case-file priorities and cautions
WikiTree recommendations
- Retain the 1803 probate event for the 1802 Larne man as a possible identity
match, but do not use it to prove a father, wife or child.
- Retain death in 1802 if supported by the memorial; do not replace it
with the probate year.
- Add Larne as death place only if the memorial or another death source says
so, not from probate residence alone.
- Keep Glasgow-3991 separate from this profile. Inspect the original 1737 entry,
reported James-Janet monument and 1762 marriage before upgrading either the William-1505 or Hugh-1503 parent hypothesis.
- Keep the ropemaker and tanner identities explicitly provisional until a lease,
will, spouse or property succession joins them.
- Retain Glasgow-3324 and Glasgow-3986 as reasonable working children, with the
former assessed probable and the latter uncertain.
Suggested edit summary: Add the 1803 Larne probate match while retaining the memorial's 1802 death year.
Sources and provenanceStructured citations and source-quality classifications.9 sources
Source or provenance: quality describes the record layer, not every conclusion drawn from it.
- unknown Public Record Office of Northern Ireland, D2977/3A/4/25/13, counterpart lease from Randall William, Earl of Antrim, to James Glasgow, tanner, of Larne, County Antrim, 1 November 1786.
- derivative Irish probate index transcription supplied July 2026, entry for James Glasgow, Diocese of Belfast, residence Larne, 1803.
- derivative Registry of Deeds Index Project, memorial 204122 (https://www.irishdeedsindex.net/mem.php?memorial=204122), deed dated 14 May 1766.
- original Larne/Kilwaughter congregation register chronology
- derivative Registry of Deeds Index Project, memorial 204122
- tree_only WikiTree profile export for Glasgow-1509
- original register chronology
- unknown published Larne monument
- unknown 1773 – Birth of James Glasgow (1773 – 1831), same tombstone in St. Cedmas as William Glasgow b. 1708.
Technical profile and raw captureDataset metadata, machine dossier and captured WikiTree biography.Advanced
WikiTree profile information
Glasgow-1509
James Glasgow
Updated 2026-08-19
Dataset: ONT_Glasco_2026-08-18T16_05.json · generated 2026-08-20
WikiTree biography, citations and relationship snapshot
Glasgow-1509 was captured 2026-08-19T11:24:03+00:00; WikiTree profile revision 2026-08-19.
Profile location claims
| Event | Date | Location | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| birth | — | County Antrim, Ireland | WikiTree profile field |
| marriage | 1762-00-00 | Non-Subscribing Presbyterian Church of Ireland | WikiTree relationship field |
Immediate relationship snapshot
| Relationship | Person | WikiTree ID | Dates and places returned |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parents | William Glasgow | Glasgow-1505 | 1708-00-00 · County Antrim, Ireland · 1783-00-00 · Larne |
| Children | William Glasgow | Glasgow-3324 | 1763-00-00 · Larne, County Antrim, Ireland · 1816-00-00 · County Antrim, Ireland. |
| Children | James Glasgow | Glasgow-3986 | 1773-00-00 · Larne, County Antrim, Ireland · 1831-00-00 |
| Siblings | Hugh Glasgow | Glasgow-3931 | 1722-00-00 · Tamlaght, County Londonderry, Ireland · 0000-00-00 |
| Siblings | Unknown Glasgow | Glasgow-3905 | 1740-00-00 · Inishrush, Tamlaght O'Crilly, County Londonderry, Ireland · 0000-00-00 |
| Siblings | John Glasgow | Glasgow-1022 | 1751-00-00 · County Antrim, Ireland · 1852-00-00 · County Antrim, Ireland, United Kingdom |
| Spouses | Janet Shutter | Shutter-46 | 1740-00-00 · 0000-00-00 · 1762-00-00 · Non-Subscribing Presbyterian Church of Ireland |
Profile categories
Glasgow_Name_Study
Record-bearing passages
- Biography James Glasgow was reportedly born in 1737. A Larne or Kilwaughter congregational record is said to contain an entry for a James, son of Hugh Glasgow, at New Town, Larne, in that year.
- The original congregational entry, or a reliable full transcription, has not yet been cited on this profile. The exact birth date, place and identification of Hugh as James’s father should therefore be treated as probable rather than conclusively established.
- On 1 November 1786, Randall William, Earl of Antrim, granted a counterpart lease to James Glasgow, tanner, of Larne, for approximately five acres at Blackcave. The lease was for eleven years at an annual rent of £14 5s. 7d. Public Record Office of Northern Ireland, D2977/3A/4/25/13, counterpart lease from Randall William, Earl of Antrim, to James Glasgow, tanner, of Larne, County Antrim, 1 November 1786.
- The description of James as “of Larne” and as a tanner provides direct contemporary evidence for his residence and occupation in 1786.
- A memorial at St Cedma’s Church, Larne, is reported to record James Glasgow with the dates 1737–1802 and to name his wife as Janet Shutter. A photograph or complete reliable transcription of the monument should be cited before the exact dates and marriage are treated as fully verified.
- James is reported to have died in 1802.
- An Irish probate-index transcription records a James Glasgow of Larne in the Diocese of Belfast in 1803. Irish probate index transcription supplied July 2026, entry for James Glasgow, Diocese of Belfast, residence Larne, 1803.
- The agreement in name and residence, together with probate in the year after the reported death, makes this a strong match to the man commemorated at St Cedma’s.
- The 1803 entry should be understood as a probate or estate event. It does not replace the reported 1802 death year. Probate occurring in the year following death would be ordinary.
- The probate entry establishes Larne as James’s recorded residence during the estate proceedings. It does not by itself prove that Larne was his place of death. Wife and family James’s wife is reported on the St Cedma’s memorial as Janet Shutter.
- The complete inscription should be obtained and cited because the memorial may also contain:
Janet’s dates;
- the date or duration of the marriage;
- children buried in the same plot;
- other Glasgow relatives; or
- wording clarifying whether the monument was erected by descendants.
- No inspected baptismal, marriage, will or probate record currently cited on this profile names James’s children.
- The 1803 probate record may be important. An original will, administration bond or surviving abstract could identify:
Janet as his widow;
- sons or daughters;
- married daughters or sons-in-law;
- executors or administrators;
- business partners;
- property at Larne or Blackcave; or
- other relatives. Research Notes Identification and evidence The following records probably concern the same man:
the James, son of Hugh Glasgow, reportedly recorded at New Town or Larne in 1737;
- James Glasgow, tanner, of Larne, named in the 1786 Blackcave lease;
- James Glasgow commemorated at St Cedma’s with dates 1737–1802 and wife Janet Shutter; and
- James Glasgow of Larne whose estate entered Belfast probate in 1803.
- The strongest direct contemporary evidence presently cited is the 1786 lease. The baptism and memorial evidence still require complete source citations, and the probate index does not name James’s father or wife.
directly documented facts, including James’s occupation and Larne residence in 1786;
- strong identity matches, including the 1803 probate entry; and
- reported but not yet fully exposed evidence, including the 1737 congregational entry and St Cedma’s memorial. Ropemaker evidence and identity distinction A Registry of Deeds memorial dated 14 May 1766 directly names James Glasgow, ropemaker of Larne, as a witness. Registry of Deeds Index Project, memorial 204122 (https://www.irishdeedsindex.net/mem.php?memorial=204122), deed dated 14 May 1766. This independently supports the older Larne ropemaker cluster reported in newspaper advertisements in 1761. Identity with the tanner recorded in 1786 remains probable rather than proved because the occupation differs.
- This man must remain separate from James Glasgow, the son of Hugh and Ann whose published monument says he died in 1812 aged 64. That James was only about thirteen in 1761 and could not have established the ropewalk. The reported 1737 congregational occurrence and the present uncertain placement under William Glasgow remain competing parentage hypotheses until the original entry or another relationship record is inspected. Research priorities Further research should obtain:
the original or fullest available congregational entry for the 1737 James, son of Hugh Glasgow;
- the name of the congregation and exact wording of that entry;
- a photograph or complete transcription of the St Cedma’s memorial;
- evidence supporting Janet Shutter’s identity and marriage to James;
- the full 1786 lease, including witnesses, adjoining occupiers and endorsements;
- any renewal or later disposition of the Blackcave property;
- the exact nature of the 1803 Belfast probate entry;
- the original will, administration record or bond, if it survives;
- a Betham or other pre-destruction abstract of the estate;
- names of beneficiaries, executors, witnesses or sureties; and
- records identifying any children of James and Janet. Research conclusion James Glasgow was directly recorded as a tanner of Larne in the 1786 Blackcave lease.
- The 1803 Belfast probate entry for James Glasgow of Larne is a strong match to the man reportedly commemorated at St Cedma’s with dates 1737–1802. It supports Larne as his probate residence while remaining consistent with death in 1802.
- The reported identification of his wife as Janet Shutter and his father as Hugh Glasgow is plausible, but the complete memorial and congregational record should be cited before those relationships and the exact dates are treated as certain. Sources
Profile source citations
- Public Record Office of Northern Ireland, D2977/3A/4/25/13, counterpart lease from Randall William, Earl of Antrim, to James Glasgow, tanner, of Larne, County Antrim, 1 November 1786.
- Irish probate index transcription supplied July 2026, entry for James Glasgow, Diocese of Belfast, residence Larne, 1803.
- Registry of Deeds Index Project, memorial 204122 (https://www.irishdeedsindex.net/mem.php?memorial=204122), deed dated 14 May 1766. source link 1
Full captured biography text
Biography James Glasgow was reportedly born in 1737. A Larne or Kilwaughter congregational record is said to contain an entry for a James, son of Hugh Glasgow, at New Town, Larne, in that year. The original congregational entry, or a reliable full transcription, has not yet been cited on this profile. The exact birth date, place and identification of Hugh as James’s father should therefore be treated as probable rather than conclusively established. James was a tanner at Larne, County Antrim. On 1 November 1786, Randall William, Earl of Antrim, granted a counterpart lease to James Glasgow, tanner, of Larne, for approximately five acres at Blackcave. The lease was for eleven years at an annual rent of £14 5s. 7d. Public Record Office of Northern Ireland, D2977/3A/4/25/13, counterpart lease from Randall William, Earl of Antrim, to James Glasgow, tanner, of Larne, County Antrim, 1 November 1786. The description of James as “of Larne” and as a tanner provides direct contemporary evidence for his residence and occupation in 1786. A memorial at St Cedma’s Church, Larne, is reported to record James Glasgow with the dates 1737–1802 and to name his wife as Janet Shutter. A photograph or complete reliable transcription of the monument should be cited before the exact dates and marriage are treated as fully verified. James is reported to have died in 1802. An Irish probate-index transcription records a James Glasgow of Larne in the Diocese of Belfast in 1803. Irish probate index transcription supplied July 2026, entry for James Glasgow, Diocese of Belfast, residence Larne, 1803. The agreement in name and residence, together with probate in the year after the reported death, makes this a strong match to the man commemorated at St Cedma’s. The 1803 entry should be understood as a probate or estate event. It does not replace the reported 1802 death year. Probate occurring in the year following death would be ordinary. The probate entry establishes Larne as James’s recorded residence during the estate proceedings. It does not by itself prove that Larne was his place of death. Wife and family James’s wife is reported on the St Cedma’s memorial as Janet Shutter. The complete inscription should be obtained and cited because the memorial may also contain: * Janet’s dates; * the date or duration of the marriage; * children buried in the same plot; * other Glasgow relatives; or * wording clarifying whether the monument was erected by descendants. No inspected baptismal, marriage, will or probate record currently cited on this profile names James’s children. The 1803 probate record may be important. An original will, administration bond or surviving abstract could identify: * Janet as his widow; * sons or daughters; * married daughters or sons-in-law; * executors or administrators; * business partners; * property at Larne or Blackcave; or * other relatives. Research Notes Identification and evidence The following records probably concern the same man: * the James, son of Hugh Glasgow, reportedly recorded at New Town or Larne in 1737; * James Glasgow, tanner, of Larne, named in the 1786 Blackcave lease; * James Glasgow commemorated at St Cedma’s with dates 1737–1802 and wife Janet Shutter; and * James Glasgow of Larne whose estate entered Belfast probate in 1803. The chronology and repeated Larne association make this identification plausible and probably correct. The strongest direct contemporary evidence presently cited is the 1786 lease. The baptism and memorial evidence still require complete source citations, and the probate index does not name James’s father or wife. The profile should therefore distinguish between: * directly documented facts, including James’s occupation and Larne residence in 1786; * strong identity matches, including the 1803 probate entry; and * reported but not yet fully exposed evidence, including the 1737 congregational entry and St Cedma’s memorial. Ropemaker evidence and identity distinction A Registry of Deeds memorial dated 14 May 1766 directly names James Glasgow, ropemaker of Larne, as a witness. Registry of Deeds Index Project, memorial 204122 (https://www.irishdeedsindex.net/mem.php?memorial=204122), deed dated 14 May 1766. This independently supports the older Larne ropemaker cluster reported in newspaper advertisements in 1761. Identity with the tanner recorded in 1786 remains probable rather than proved because the occupation differs. This man must remain separate from James Glasgow, the son of Hugh and Ann whose published monument says he died in 1812 aged 64. That James was only about thirteen in 1761 and could not have established the ropewalk. The reported 1737 congregational occurrence and the present uncertain placement under William Glasgow remain competing parentage hypotheses until the original entry or another relationship record is inspected. Research priorities Further research should obtain: * the original or fullest available congregational entry for the 1737 James, son of Hugh Glasgow; * the name of the congregation and exact wording of that entry; * a photograph or complete transcription of the St Cedma’s memorial; * evidence supporting Janet Shutter’s identity and marriage to James; * the full 1786 lease, including witnesses, adjoining occupiers and endorsements; * any renewal or later disposition of the Blackcave property; * the exact nature of the 1803 Belfast probate entry; * the original will, administration record or bond, if it survives; * a Betham or other pre-destruction abstract of the estate; * names of beneficiaries, executors, witnesses or sureties; and * records identifying any children of James and Janet. Research conclusion James Glasgow was directly recorded as a tanner of Larne in the 1786 Blackcave lease. The 1803 Belfast probate entry for James Glasgow of Larne is a strong match to the man reportedly commemorated at St Cedma’s with dates 1737–1802. It supports Larne as his probate residence while remaining consistent with death in 1802. The reported identification of his wife as Janet Shutter and his father as Hugh Glasgow is plausible, but the complete memorial and congregational record should be cited before those relationships and the exact dates are treated as certain. Sources
Raw WikiTree biography markup
{{One Name Study|name=Glasgow}}
== Biography ==
'''James Glasgow''' was reportedly born in '''1737'''. A Larne or Kilwaughter congregational record is said to contain an entry for a James, son of [[Glasgow-1499|Hugh Glasgow]], at '''New Town, Larne''', in that year.
The original congregational entry, or a reliable full transcription, has not yet been cited on this profile. The exact birth date, place and identification of Hugh as James’s father should therefore be treated as probable rather than conclusively established.
James was a '''tanner''' at Larne, County Antrim.
On '''1 November 1786''', Randall William, Earl of Antrim, granted a counterpart lease to '''James Glasgow, tanner, of Larne''', for approximately five acres at '''Blackcave'''. The lease was for eleven years at an annual rent of £14 5s. 7d.<ref>Public Record Office of Northern Ireland, D2977/3A/4/25/13, counterpart lease from Randall William, Earl of Antrim, to James Glasgow, tanner, of Larne, County Antrim, 1 November 1786.</ref>
The description of James as “of Larne” and as a tanner provides direct contemporary evidence for his residence and occupation in 1786.
A memorial at '''St Cedma’s Church, Larne''', is reported to record James Glasgow with the dates '''1737–1802''' and to name his wife as '''Janet Shutter'''. A photograph or complete reliable transcription of the monument should be cited before the exact dates and marriage are treated as fully verified.
James is reported to have died in '''1802'''.
An Irish probate-index transcription records a '''James Glasgow of Larne''' in the Diocese of Belfast in '''1803'''.<ref>Irish probate index transcription supplied July 2026, entry for James Glasgow, Diocese of Belfast, residence Larne, 1803.</ref>
The agreement in name and residence, together with probate in the year after the reported death, makes this a strong match to the man commemorated at St Cedma’s.
The 1803 entry should be understood as a probate or estate event. It does not replace the reported 1802 death year. Probate occurring in the year following death would be ordinary.
The probate entry establishes Larne as James’s recorded residence during the estate proceedings. It does not by itself prove that Larne was his place of death.
=== Wife and family ===
James’s wife is reported on the St Cedma’s memorial as '''Janet Shutter'''.
The complete inscription should be obtained and cited because the memorial may also contain:
* Janet’s dates;
* the date or duration of the marriage;
* children buried in the same plot;
* other Glasgow relatives; or
* wording clarifying whether the monument was erected by descendants.
No inspected baptismal, marriage, will or probate record currently cited on this profile names James’s children.
The 1803 probate record may be important. An original will, administration bond or surviving abstract could identify:
* Janet as his widow;
* sons or daughters;
* married daughters or sons-in-law;
* executors or administrators;
* business partners;
* property at Larne or Blackcave; or
* other relatives.
== Research Notes ==
=== Identification and evidence ===
The following records probably concern the same man:
* the James, son of Hugh Glasgow, reportedly recorded at New Town or Larne in 1737;
* James Glasgow, tanner, of Larne, named in the 1786 Blackcave lease;
* James Glasgow commemorated at St Cedma’s with dates 1737–1802 and wife Janet Shutter; and
* James Glasgow of Larne whose estate entered Belfast probate in 1803.
The chronology and repeated Larne association make this identification plausible and probably correct.
The strongest direct contemporary evidence presently cited is the 1786 lease. The baptism and memorial evidence still require complete source citations, and the probate index does not name James’s father or wife.
The profile should therefore distinguish between:
* directly documented facts, including James’s occupation and Larne residence in 1786;
* strong identity matches, including the 1803 probate entry; and
* reported but not yet fully exposed evidence, including the 1737 congregational entry and St Cedma’s memorial.
=== Ropemaker evidence and identity distinction ===
A Registry of Deeds memorial dated 14 May 1766 directly names '''James Glasgow, ropemaker of Larne''', as a witness.<ref>[https://www.irishdeedsindex.net/mem.php?memorial=204122 Registry of Deeds Index Project, memorial 204122], deed dated 14 May 1766.</ref> This independently supports the older Larne ropemaker cluster reported in newspaper advertisements in 1761. Identity with the tanner recorded in 1786 remains probable rather than proved because the occupation differs.
This man must remain separate from [[Glasgow-3991|James Glasgow]], the son of Hugh and Ann whose published monument says he died in 1812 aged 64. That James was only about thirteen in 1761 and could not have established the ropewalk. The reported 1737 congregational occurrence and the present uncertain placement under [[Glasgow-1505|William Glasgow]] remain competing parentage hypotheses until the original entry or another relationship record is inspected.
=== Research priorities ===
Further research should obtain:
* the original or fullest available congregational entry for the 1737 James, son of Hugh Glasgow;
* the name of the congregation and exact wording of that entry;
* a photograph or complete transcription of the St Cedma’s memorial;
* evidence supporting Janet Shutter’s identity and marriage to James;
* the full 1786 lease, including witnesses, adjoining occupiers and endorsements;
* any renewal or later disposition of the Blackcave property;
* the exact nature of the 1803 Belfast probate entry;
* the original will, administration record or bond, if it survives;
* a Betham or other pre-destruction abstract of the estate;
* names of beneficiaries, executors, witnesses or sureties; and
* records identifying any children of James and Janet.
=== Research conclusion ===
James Glasgow was directly recorded as a tanner of Larne in the 1786 Blackcave lease.
The 1803 Belfast probate entry for James Glasgow of Larne is a strong match to the man reportedly commemorated at St Cedma’s with dates 1737–1802. It supports Larne as his probate residence while remaining consistent with death in 1802.
The reported identification of his wife as Janet Shutter and his father as Hugh Glasgow is plausible, but the complete memorial and congregational record should be cited before those relationships and the exact dates are treated as certain.
== Sources ==
<references />