Glasgow Surname Project

Individual research record

Robert Glasco

c. 1779 – ?

Glasgow-1367 · 2 mapped associations

County Tyrone, IrelandDeath place unknown

At a glance

Identity & family

Tree links organise the family; documentary status still varies.

2Mapped records
10Close relations
16Evidence items
12Candidate leads
Birth
c. 1779 · County Tyrone, Ireland
Death
Not recorded · Place not recorded
Parents
Unknown GlasgowuncertainJohn Glasgowuncertain
Spouses
Catherine (Unknown) Glasgow
Children
Hugh GlasgowJohn GlasgowMargaret (Glasgow) WintersRobert Glasgow SrSamuel GlasgowUnknown Young GlasgowWilliam Glasgow
Gender
Male
WikiTree
Glasgow-1367
Research clusters
East Antrim/Kilwaughter cluster
Mapped descendants
56

Comparison context

These child positions and checks are the subject details used to rank possible parents below.

Naming sequence used by the parentage model

Paternal grandfather positionRobert Glasgow Sr (1811)
Maternal grandfather positionJohn Glasgow (1813)
Maternal grandmother positionMargaret (Glasgow) Winters (1801)
Paternal grandmother positionUnknown Young Glasgow (1818)

Known-position checks: 0 support · 1 conflict. Ordinals retain unnamed children and recognise reused names.

Estimate and relationship notes
  • The export reports 5 children but 7 named child profiles are recoverable from this export.

Relationship comparison

Potential parents or duplicates

Compare scored leads with the subject details above—not proof.

Higher-signal leadReview carefullyWeak lead

Possible fathers5 leads

Automated fit39/100
Weak Lead
Dates1760–?Generation19 years age gapRecorded placesScotland · Cookstown, County Tyrone, Ireland · CookstownIndependent clue breadth · 6Age · Broad Geography · Broad Migration · Rare Branch-Name Recurrence · Rare Name Bundle · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • possible 19-year parent-child age gap (+10)
  • candidate's birth is 41 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1801), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • weak broad-area overlap: tyrone (+1; not a locality match)

a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); descendant-name recurrence has no independent household, record, migration or specific-locality anchor (score capped at 39)

Show complete scoring
  • possible 19-year parent-child age gap (+10)
  • candidate's birth is 41 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1801), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • weak broad-area overlap: tyrone (+1; not a locality match)
  • uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Jane +11 (71 public profiles; subject branch: Jane Glasgow, Jane Glasgow; candidate branch: Jane Glasgow, Jane Glasgow; +8 repetition bonus); Ellen +8 (16 public profiles; subject branch: Ellen Glasgow; candidate branch: Ellen Elizabeth (Glasgow) Hancock); David +7 (39 public profiles; subject branch: David Glasgow; candidate branch: David Glasgow, David Charles Glasgow; +4 repetition bonus) (+34 total including +8 multi-name bonus)
  • descendant branches share only a broad migration destination country (+1; weak alone): australia, united states

Deductions and cautions: a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); descendant-name recurrence has no independent household, record, migration or specific-locality anchor (score capped at 39)

Automated fit39/100
Weak Lead
Dates1750–1822Generation29 years age gapRecorded placesMoneymore, County Londonderry, Ireland · Rockbridge, Virginia, United States · MoneymoreIndependent clue breadth · 9Age · Collateral Naming · Household · Indirect Multi-Factor Convergence · Rare Branch-Name Recurrence · Rare Name Bundle · Repeated Marriage Surnames · Spouse · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 29-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): collateral network, household chronology, naming
  • candidate's birth is 51 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1801), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)

a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10); candidate already has another child named Robert Arthur Glasgow (Glasgow-902) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict); descendant-name recurrence has no independent household, record, migration or specific-locality anchor (score capped at 39)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 29-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 51 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1801), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • a known child was born within 4 years of the subject (+1)
  • known spouse Rebecca Anderson (McNutt) Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (24) at the subject's birth (+3)
  • uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Ellen +8 (16 public profiles; subject branch: Ellen Glasgow; candidate branch: Ellen Anderson Gholson Glasgow); Joseph +7 (39 public profiles; subject branch: Joseph Glasgow; candidate branch: Joseph Anderson Glasgow, Joseph T Glasgow; +4 repetition bonus); Alexander +5 (59 public profiles; subject branch: Alexander Glasgow; candidate branch: Alexander McNutt Glasgow, Alexander Glasgow; +2 repetition bonus) (+28 total including +8 multi-name bonus)
  • candidate's sibling and niece/nephew network repeats names in the subject's descendant line (three rarest at most): Jane +5 (71 public profiles; niece/nephew Jane (Glasgow) Patton; +2 repetition bonus); Nancy +3 (49 public profiles; niece/nephew Nancy (Glasgow) McClelland) (+8 total)
  • uncommon spouse surnames recur across the subject and candidate branches: Anderson +4 (+4 total)
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): collateral network, household chronology, naming

Deductions and cautions: a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10); candidate already has another child named Robert Arthur Glasgow (Glasgow-902) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict); descendant-name recurrence has no independent household, record, migration or specific-locality anchor (score capped at 39)

Show 3 lower-scoring possible fathers
Automated fit34/100
Weak Lead
Dates1739–1831Generation40 years age gapRecorded placesCounty Londonderry, Ireland · Pine Creek, Allegheny, Pennsylvania, United States · Portglenone — regional family-tradition referenceIndependent clue breadth · 9Age · Broad Migration · Household · Rare Branch-Name Recurrence · Rare Name Bundle · Sex-Aware Ordered Naming · Spouse · Tradition Validation · Two-GenerationExisting-tree context (not an independent clue)Rare Sibling-Name PatternCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 40-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 62 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1801), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • a known child was born within 1 years of the subject (+3)

a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10); candidate already has another child named Robert Glasgow (Glasgow-546) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 40-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 62 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1801), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • a known child was born within 1 years of the subject (+3)
  • known spouse Sarah (Blair) Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (22) at the subject's birth (+3)
  • candidate's name matches the first dated son Hugh Glasgow, the expected father position for a male subject (+5; catalogue rarity 1, Hugh in 36 profiles)
  • family naming controls: 0 supporting and 1 conflicting known positions (already reflected in naming weight)
  • candidate's other children share uncommon given names with the subject's recorded siblings: Alexander +3 (59 public profiles); Nancy +3 (49 public profiles) (+6 total)
  • uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Jane +7 (71 public profiles; subject branch: Jane Glasgow, Jane Glasgow; candidate branch: Jane Glasgow; +4 repetition bonus); Joseph +3 (39 public profiles; subject branch: Joseph Glasgow; candidate branch: Joseph B Glasgow) (+14 total including +4 multi-name bonus)
  • descendant branches share only a broad migration destination country (+1; weak alone): united states

Deductions and cautions: a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10); candidate already has another child named Robert Glasgow (Glasgow-546) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict)

Automated fit30/100
Weak Lead
Dates1750–1800Generation29 years age gapRecorded placesHarford County, MarylandIndependent clue breadth · 7Age · Household · Same-Sex Generational Naming · Sex-Aware Ordered Naming · Spouse · Tradition Validation · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 29-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 51 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1801), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • a known child was born within 1 years of the subject (+3)

a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 29-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 51 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1801), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • a known child was born within 1 years of the subject (+3)
  • known spouse Apphia (Moores) Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (22) at the subject's birth (+3)
  • candidate and subject share the given name Robert (+4; weak direct parent-child name recurrence, 165 public profiles)
  • candidate's name matches the first dated son Robert Glasgow Sr, the expected father position for a male subject (+4; catalogue rarity 0, Robert in 165 profiles)
  • family naming controls: 0 supporting and 1 conflicting known positions (already reflected in naming weight)

Deductions and cautions: a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Automated fit28/100
Weak Lead
Dates1758–1789Generation21 years age gapRecorded placesCecil, Maryland · Cecil, Maryland.Independent clue breadth · 3Age · Collateral Naming · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 21-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 43 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1801), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • candidate's sibling and niece/nephew network repeats names in the subject's descendant line (three rarest at most): Adam +12 (15 public profiles; sibling Adam Glasgow) (+12 total)

a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 21-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 43 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1801), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • candidate's sibling and niece/nephew network repeats names in the subject's descendant line (three rarest at most): Adam +12 (15 public profiles; sibling Adam Glasgow) (+12 total)

Deductions and cautions: a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Possible mothers5 leads

Automated fit36/100
Weak Lead
Dates1757–1840Generation22 years age gapRecorded placesIreland · Allegheny, Pennsylvania, United States · County Antrim — exact locality unprovedIndependent clue breadth · 7Age · Broad Migration · Household · Rare Branch-Name Recurrence · Rare Name Bundle · Sex-Aware Ordered Naming · Two-GenerationExisting-tree context (not an independent clue)Rare Sibling-Name PatternCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 22-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 44 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1801), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • a known child was born within 1 years of the subject (+3)

same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10); candidate already has another child named Robert Glasgow (Glasgow-546) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 22-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 44 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1801), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • a known child was born within 1 years of the subject (+3)
  • a candidate spouse matches the first dated son Hugh Glasgow, the expected father position (+4; Hugh in 36 profiles)
  • candidate's other children share uncommon given names with the subject's recorded siblings: Alexander +3 (59 public profiles); Nancy +3 (49 public profiles) (+6 total)
  • uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Jane +7 (71 public profiles; subject branch: Jane Glasgow, Jane Glasgow; candidate branch: Jane Glasgow; +4 repetition bonus); Joseph +3 (39 public profiles; subject branch: Joseph Glasgow; candidate branch: Joseph B Glasgow) (+14 total including +4 multi-name bonus)
  • descendant branches share only a broad migration destination country (+1; weak alone): united states

Deductions and cautions: same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10); candidate already has another child named Robert Glasgow (Glasgow-546) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict)

Automated fit31/100
Weak Lead
Dates1755–?Generation24 years age gapRecorded placesCurrie — MidlothianIndependent clue breadth · 3Age · Spouse-Specific Child Window · Two-GenerationExisting-tree context (not an independent clue)Rare Sibling-Name PatternSame-spouse child windowAlexander GlasgowCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 24-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 46 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1801), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1774–1783) (+6; other parent Alexander Glasgow)

locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 24-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 46 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1801), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1774–1783) (+6; other parent Alexander Glasgow)
  • candidate's other children share uncommon given names with the subject's recorded siblings: Andrew +3 (31 public profiles) (+3 total)

Deductions and cautions: locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Show 3 lower-scoring possible mothers
Automated fit31/100
Weak Lead
Dates1755–1818Generation24 years age gapRecorded placesLexington, Rockbridge, Virginia · Lexington, Rockbridge, Virginia, United StatesIndependent clue breadth · 7Age · Household · Indirect Multi-Factor Convergence · Rare Branch-Name Recurrence · Rare Name Bundle · Repeated Marriage Surnames · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 24-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): collateral network, household chronology, naming
  • candidate's birth is 46 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1801), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)

candidate is recorded only outside the subject's birth country (−25); candidate already has another child named Robert Arthur Glasgow (Glasgow-902) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 24-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 46 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1801), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • a known child was born within 4 years of the subject (+1)
  • uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Ellen +8 (16 public profiles; subject branch: Ellen Glasgow; candidate branch: Ellen Anderson Gholson Glasgow); Joseph +7 (39 public profiles; subject branch: Joseph Glasgow; candidate branch: Joseph Anderson Glasgow, Joseph T Glasgow; +4 repetition bonus); Alexander +5 (59 public profiles; subject branch: Alexander Glasgow; candidate branch: Alexander McNutt Glasgow, Alexander Glasgow; +2 repetition bonus) (+28 total including +8 multi-name bonus)
  • uncommon spouse surnames recur across the subject and candidate branches: Anderson +4 (+4 total)
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): collateral network, household chronology, naming

Deductions and cautions: candidate is recorded only outside the subject's birth country (−25); candidate already has another child named Robert Arthur Glasgow (Glasgow-902) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict)

Automated fit31/100
Weak Lead
Dates1730–?Generation49 years age gapRecorded placesScotland · Cookstown, County Tyrone, Ireland · Scotland — exact locality unprovedIndependent clue breadth · 7Age · Broad Geography · Broad Migration · Household · Sex-Aware Ordered Naming · Tradition Validation · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • candidate's birth is 71 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1801), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • a known child was born within 1 years of the subject (+3)
  • less typical 49-year parent-child age gap (+2)

No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required

Show complete scoring
  • less typical 49-year parent-child age gap (+2)
  • candidate's birth is 71 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1801), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • weak broad-area overlap: tyrone (+1; not a locality match)
  • a known child was born within 1 years of the subject (+3)
  • candidate's name matches the second dated daughter Unknown Young Glasgow, the expected mother position for a male subject (+20; catalogue rarity 12, in 0 profiles)
  • family naming controls: 0 supporting and 1 conflicting known positions (already reflected in naming weight)
  • descendant branches share only a broad migration destination country (+1; weak alone): united states

Deductions and cautions: No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required

Automated fit30/100
Weak Lead
Dates1740–?Generation39 years age gapRecorded placesRoxburghshire — exact locality unprovedIndependent clue breadth · 3Age · Collateral Naming · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 39-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 61 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1801), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • candidate's sibling and niece/nephew network repeats names in the subject's descendant line (three rarest at most): David +5 (39 public profiles; sibling David Glasgow; +2 repetition bonus); Catherine +3 (32 public profiles; niece/nephew Catherine Glasgow) (+8 total)

locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 39-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 61 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1801), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • candidate's sibling and niece/nephew network repeats names in the subject's descendant line (three rarest at most): David +5 (39 public profiles; sibling David Glasgow; +2 repetition bonus); Catherine +3 (32 public profiles; niece/nephew Catherine Glasgow) (+8 total)

Deductions and cautions: locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

How parent leads are calculated

Automated leads use birth surnames—not married surnames—as parental eligibility, role-specific biological age limits, bounded and approximate-date uncertainty, household chronology, specific time-aware localities, mapped distance, tenancy succession, migration destinations and sex-aware Scottish naming positions across generations. People already attached as the subject's parents stay in the identity summary and are excluded from this alternative-candidate list, regardless of relationship confidence. The main calibration uses clues available on disconnected profiles; existing parent and sibling links are retained as comparison context rather than treated as transferable evidence. Common ordered names and grandparent-to-child echoes receive a small non-zero weight, so a John or James match can support several independent criteria without producing a lead alone. Rare names, repeated bearers and bundles across otherwise distinct branches receive substantially more weight according to catalogue frequency. An exact migration place is weighted by its rarity and repetition across both branches; a shared destination country is worth only one point. Extra weight is added only when at least three independent clue types converge: naming, locality, specific migration, household chronology or collateral networks. Sparse profiles retain a clearly labelled chronology-only fallback instead of disappearing. Countries, states, counties and research clusters do not count as a shared locality, and fallback, broad representative or kin-inferred coordinates are excluded from distance scoring. Shared descendant profiles are removed before branch-name comparison. A candidate already recorded as a parent-in-law is excluded. A confident or independently supported parent is treated as settled; uncertain and unassessed attachments remain open to alternative comparison. A different linked parent, an uncle/aunt or grandparent path, and a matching existing child profile prevent an alternative from being classified as a strong direct-parent lead until the underlying tree conflict or duplicate is resolved. Familiar forms such as Bessie are normalised. Surname remains an eligibility filter worth zero points.

Naming customs, shared farms and occupations are circumstantial. Children, spouses and collateral relatives may be missing, and tree-derived family networks are not independent evidence. Scores rank research leads; they do not prove parentage.

Same-name candidate

Robert GlasgowGlasgow-1189

Automated fit56/100
Similar Person
Dates1769–1858PlacesTyrone, Ireland → Martinsburg, Lewis, New York, United StatesParent comparisonNo shared parent is indexed
Why it may fit
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 10 (+10)
  • overlapping locality (+8)

No indexed conflict

Full comparison detail
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 10 (+10)
  • overlapping locality (+8)
  • matching child names: John Glasgow, William Glasgow

Conflicts: No indexed conflict

Automated fit51/100
Similar Person
Dates1783–1861PlacesRockbridge, Virginia, United States → Hanna City, Peoria, Illinois, United StatesParent comparisonNo shared parent is indexed
Why it may fit
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 4 (+18)
  • matching child name: William Glasgow

unassessed father attachments differ (−5)

Full comparison detail
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 4 (+18)
  • matching child name: William Glasgow
  • child given-name pattern overlaps: Margaret, Robert, Samuel

Conflicts: unassessed father attachments differ (−5)

How duplicate leads are calculated

Dates are eligibility gates, not merely deductions: chronologically impossible people are excluded. Dates, places, spouses, parent certainty and children's profiles and names are then compared. A high score is a prompt to inspect records, not a merge recommendation.

Open only what you need

Research & records

Latest case researchThe current conclusion from the durable research case file.Updated

Current answer

Glasgow-1367 · updated 2026-08-13

Grandchildren identity audit, 13 August 2026

The extended family in Glenleslie house 23 is only partly reconstructed.

Census personPresent status
Mary Glasgow, 34, niece[[Glasgow-3957]] is the strongest located identity. Her 1862 marriage names Hugh Glasgow, weaver, as father, which would make Hugh Robert's probable brother if the identity is correct. It is not yet certain.
Mary and James Young, both 15, grandchildrenNo individual profiles or proved parents. [[Glasgow-3955]] represents their inferred Glasgow mother only. A Mary Young who married James Rush in 1859 at Roadsedermot and a James Young who married Eliza Lowry in 1872 at Gortaheran both named a father William Young, farmer. The shared father and nearby places make a testable sibling hypothesis, but the age estimates differ, Griffith's Valuation lists no William Young at either residence, no matching Ballymena Rush births were found in 1864-85, and neither candidate was securely recovered in 1901. Do not attach them yet. Saved Mary's register page and James's register page.
Catherine Hume, three-month-old deceased granddaughterNo profile or proved parents. Samuel and Sarah Ann Hume, married in 1844 with son James and deceased daughter Mary Jane, lived elsewhere in Glenleslie in 1851 and remain the best local parent candidates. Their reported marriage predates civil non-Catholic registration; the public Rasharkin Presbyterian baptism transcription contains no Hume entry, and no suitable later Samuel/Sarah Ann household or death was identified. An 1880 Ballymena James Hume marriage names father John, excluding that groom as Samuel's son. Nothing yet calls Sarah Ann a Glasgow.

The Young pair is the most promising free-record lead: trace both candidate couples through civil births, deaths, later censuses, grave inscriptions and newspapers, looking for the same William Young, a Glenleslie/Roadsedermot address, or a Glasgow relative as witness or informant. For Catherine Hume, the critical target is a church transcription or family notice for Samuel Hume's reported 1844 marriage; civil registration began too late.

Hugh collateral update, 13 August 2026

Mary Glasgow-3957, the strongest identity candidate for Robert's 1851 niece, named her father as Hugh Glasgow, weaver. Two further original marriages define a concrete Hugh Glasgow household at Liminary in Ballyclug: Hugh junior married Ann Wilson in 1852 and Eliza Glasgow married William Montgomery in 1854; both named a father Hugh Glasgow, weaver. Hugh junior and Eliza are therefore proved children of an elder Hugh. Mary is a plausible older sister, but her marriage gives no residence and does not prove that all three named the same Hugh.

The surviving 1851 County Antrim census search produced no Liminary household or age-compatible elder Hugh. This is a survival/transcription limitation, not evidence that the family was absent.

The records strengthen Hugh as Robert's probable brother only through the Mary-as-niece identity. They do not yet justify a structured sibling link.

No inspected record links Robert Glasgow of Glenleslie to Adam Glasgow of Inishrush or names Alexander Glasgow-951 as his son. The direct chain for this profile is the 1851 Glenleslie census followed by the newly found 1854 Glenleslie will index. The 1820 lease, 1827 tithe and 1831 census instead form a secure Coltrim chain now represented separately by Glasgow-3941. No document bridges those two identities or connects either man to the Robert holding 35 acres at Lisnagaver in 1834. Household adjacency also does not establish John Glasgow-1022 as Robert's father. The best present placement is instead the Dunaghy / Doonbought-Glenleslie tenant cluster: an age-compatible Robert Glasco was at Doonbought in 1825, while Robert's probable son of the same name headed a Doonbought household in 1851 and Robert himself headed a neighbouring Glenleslie household. This supports local family continuity but still does not name Robert's parents. Leave both parents blank.

The close R-FT20271 pairing between Alexander Glasgow-951 and the James J Glasgow Glasgow-2738 line does not place this Robert in either pedigree. No direct male-line descendant of Robert has a confirmed Big Y result in the project. The three workable paper models remain, in descending order of fit:

  1. Robert and older Alexander Glasgow-3904 were brothers or cousins below an

unidentified Dunaghy/Bann Valley ancestor. This requires the fewest hidden relationships.

  1. Robert was an early son of older Alexander. This requires older Alexander to

have been born by about 1760 and probably requires more than one partnership.

  1. Robert was an early son or younger brother of John Glasgow-1022. A son

relationship requires a mother and union before John's reported 1791 marriage to Rose.

None is a relationship to mark certain. Robert's parent fields should remain blank until a direct record or a tested male-line descendant supplies the missing bridge.

Life and record timelineChronological mapped occurrences and their underlying sources.2 records
1854

Belfast probate; residence Glenleslie, Ahoghill

Glenleslie townland

The exact townland strongly matches Robert-1367, proved at Glenleslie in 1851; the probate index supplies no age or relatives, so identity remains a candidate.

Probate indexunknown
Source and mapping detail

Public Record Office of Northern Ireland, PRONI Names, Pre-1858 Wills and Admons, Connor Diocesan Wills, Robert Glasgow, Glenleslie, 1854; searched 5 August 2026 at PRONI Names (https://apps.proni.gov.uk/ProniNames_IE/SearchPage.aspx).

Candidate matched on record type, year, place; inspect before treating it as the underlying record.

Precision: Exact townland centrepoint

Case-file source findingsSource extracts and analysis regenerated from findings.md.1 section(s)

Source findings

Glasgow-1367 · updated 2026-08-13

SourceFindingAssessment
Hugh Glasgow and Ann Wilson's 1852 marriageHugh, 23, weaver of Liminary, named father Hugh Glasgow, weaver.Direct proof of the younger Hugh's father.
William Montgomery and Eliza Glasgow's 1854 marriageEliza, 21, of Liminary, named father Hugh Glasgow, weaver.Direct proof of Eliza's father and a concrete sibling candidate for Hugh junior.
PRONI eCatalogue D3632/B/17/5; saved catalogue noteIn November 1820 the Drapers' Company leased a holding in Coltrim to Robert Glasgow.Direct evidence for the separate Coltrim profile Glasgow-3941; no identifier links him to this Glenleslie Robert.
PRONI original Lissan tithe book FIN/5/A/203; Coltrim image, Dunnabraggy image, and transcriptionIn 1827 Robert Glasgow held 17a 3r 4p at Coltrim. Another entry names a Robert at Dunnabraggy.Direct evidence for Coltrim Glasgow-3941; neither the Dunnabraggy identity nor a connection to Glasgow-1367 is proved.
1831 census, Coltrim house 2Robert headed a Presbyterian household of six males and five females at Coltrim.Final direct record in the Glasgow-3941 Coltrim chain; household members are unnamed.
Original 1851 census, Glenleslie household 23Robert was 72, Antrim-born, a farmer, married to Catherine, and reported marrying in 1803. Children and grandchildren were in the household, but no parent or Inishrush relative was named.Direct evidence for Robert's own household; no Adam link. The age places birth about 1778/79. Saved page 1 and page 2.
Detailed 1851 census transcription, p. 103John Glasgow-1022, 99, an Antrim-born farmer, headed house 21; Hamill headed 22; Robert headed 23. John and Rose reported marrying in 1791.Best indirect evidence for a possible John-Robert father-son link, but not a relationship statement. Robert predates the marriage by about twelve years.
Original 1851 census, absent-members tableRobert's sons John Glasgow, 40, labourer, and Samuel Glasgow, 30, linen weaver, were both recorded as residing in America. No state, spouse, migration year, or other locator was supplied.Direct father-son evidence and a valid emigration lead. It is not enough to identify any American namesake: a candidate must also carry a Glenleslie/Antrim or sibling/parent marker. Saved original absent-members page.
Adam and Rose Glasgow gravestone at Tamlaght O'CrillyRose died in 1833 aged 66, implying birth about 1766/67.Rose would have been about twelve at Robert's census-implied birth. This strongly contradicts the current proposed mother.
PRONI original Rasharkin tithe book FIN/5/A/236; saved imageA separate Robt Glasgow held 35a at Lisnagaver immediately after Alexr Glasgow, who held 29a.The original confirms two distinct holdings, not ages or kinship. Nothing identifies this Robert with the Coltrim/Glenleslie man.
Macafee, North Antrim tithe data in document order, Dunaghy record 5804Robert Glasco was recorded at Doonbought [Dunbught No. 2] in 1825. The immediately surrounding entries are other Doonbought occupiers, confirming the townland reading.The elder Robert was about 46 and is the strongest identified candidate. [[Glasgow-1049Robert Glasgow (born about 1811)]] was only about 14 and is unlikely to have been the tithe occupier. This is a strong identity hypothesis, not an explicit parent record.
Original 1851 census, Doonbought household 16[[Glasgow-1049Robert Glasgow]], aged 40, headed a separate Doonbought household with wife Margaret and children.Supports a possible land/family succession from the 1825 Robert to the younger Robert. The census does not name the younger man's parents, so the existing father edge remains circumstantial.
PRONI D2223/15/56, Ballyboggy title-deed bundle, 1704-c.1870A 1740 lease names [[Glasgow-3959John Glasgow]] as joint lessee of one-third of Ballyboggy. The bundle's later principal leases name Lyle, Aikin, Harbison and Douglass rather than a Glasgow.Establishes an older Glasgow presence in Ballyboggy, which borders Glenleslie, but does not prove descent to Robert. The later deeds prevent assuming that John's exact lease simply passed to the 1825 Glasgows.
Griffith's Valuation, Rasharkin and Robert/Jane marriage, 1866Griffith lists a Robert at Gortereghy. Younger Robert Glasgow-938 was a 25-year-old Lisnagaver farmer, son of Alexander, whose bride lived at Gortereghy.Exclusionary identity evidence: the younger man is the materially better Gortereghy candidate. Do not move this elderly Glenleslie Robert there.
PRONI revision books VAL/12/B/4/17A, Gortereghy folio 21, and 17B, folio 22; 1864 scan, later scanRobert Glasgow occupied the separate house 18c in 1864 and was carried into the next volume.Further exclusionary evidence. Glasgow-938 was about 24 and directly linked to both adjoining townlands by 1866; this profile would have been about 85.
Civil death index, Ballymoney district, 1868, Robert Glasgow aged 71A possible local death entry exists, but no public original image identifies the man.Unresolved namesake. If it is this Robert, its age implies birth about 1796/97 and conflicts with the 1851 age.
PRONI Names, Pre-1858 Wills and Admons, Connor Diocesan Wills; saved resultA Robert Glasgow of Glenleslie has a will-index date of 1854. PRONI states that the original will was destroyed and no further information survives.Independent townland/date anchor that exactly follows the 1851 household. It likely marks probate or death, but cannot supply heirs or prove parentage. The later 1858-1965 Will Calendar is the wrong date range for him.
PRONI Guide to Church Records, Rasharkin Presbyterian MIC1P/292The surviving Rasharkin Presbyterian baptism register begins in 1834 and its marriage register in 1845.Neither register can supply Robert's circa-1779 baptism or reported 1803 marriage. The absence of a parent record is a survival gap, not evidence for Adam.
James McClure Glasgow's missionary journal, Warrnambool obituary transcription, and Victoria Gazette probate noticeA different Robert Glasgow, born about 1814 near Ballymena, was directly called brother by missionaries James and Adam Dickey Glasgow and died at Purnim, Victoria, in 1875.Excluded collateral family. This Robert is already Glasgow-1656, son of the separate Clough/Ballymena household, and cannot support an Adam-of-Inishrush link for Robert of Glenleslie. See research/Glasgow-1656/findings.md.
Evidence assessmentWhat is supported, uncertain or disputed in the current case model.15 claims
7Original
5Unknown
3Derivative
1Tree Only

Documented or strongly supported

No claims in this category have been formally assessed.

Working hypotheses and conflicts

Robert Glasco was recorded in Doonbought townland (1825).

probable1 linked evidence item

Tithe occupier at Doonbought

Robert Glasco was son of, possibly by an earlier partner John Glasgow

possible1 linked evidence item

Robert and John were older Antrim-born farmers in the Glenleslie 1851 enumeration cluster; the age gap fits, but the census states no relationship and Robert predates John's recorded 1791 marriage.

Case-file assessments

Parentage conclusion

Glasgow-1367 · updated 2026-08-13

Robert is unsupported and chronologically implausible as Adam and Rose's son. John Glasgow-1022 is only a weak locality candidate: houses 21 and 23 were nearby, but no record states kinship and Robert predates John's reported 1791 marriage. Do not attach either proposed father; leave both parents blank.

The more defensible tree placement is beneath an unknown Dunaghy father, in the same local tenant network as [[Glasgow-3959|John Glasgow of Ballyboggy]], the two James Glasgows at Ballybogy in 1825, and [[Glasgow-1022|John Glasgow of Glenleslie]]. John Glasgow-3959 is old enough to be an earlier ancestor rather than Robert's father; no intermediate generation has been identified.

Possible relationship to Alexander Glasgow-951

Glasgow-1367 · updated 2026-08-13

Robert is old enough to be Alexander's father and his reported 1803 marriage is chronologically compatible. That is the full positive case. His 1851 record names sons John and Samuel but not Alexander, though its child list need not be complete. The Coltrim household now belongs to the separate unresolved profile Glasgow-3941, and the 1834 Lisnagaver Robert has no age, wife or relationship identifier. Treat this Robert as a possible older relative only; do not attach him as Alexander's father without an explicit record.

Relationship to Alexander Glasgow-3904

Glasgow-1367 · updated 2026-08-13

The adjacent Alexr and Robt Lisnagaver tithe holdings keep a brother/cousin relationship between [[Glasgow-3904|older Alexander Glasgow]] and this Robert possible. It is not the best placement evidence for Robert: his Antrim birth, Doonbought occurrence, Glenleslie household and 1854 Glenleslie will index form a more coherent Dunaghy-centred sequence. Keep the men in separate working branches unless a lease, church record, will abstract or DNA comparison with documented tester pedigrees supplies the missing bridge.

Best unified working model

The least contradictory present model places Robert and older Alexander in the same broad generation below an unidentified earlier Bann Valley/Dunaghy Glasgow ancestor, probably as brothers or first cousins. This is more coherent than making either a son of [[Glasgow-1022|John Glasgow]] or [[Glasgow-3902|Adam Glasgow]], but is not yet a relationship to add.

The separate [[Glasgow-2385|Alexander Glasgow of Glenleslie]] adds limited support: his original 1847 marriage names an older John Glasgow, labourer, as father, proving that the Alexander given name also occurred inside the Dunaghy network. His current attachment to [[Glasgow-867|John Glasgow of Lisnagaver]] is chronologically impossible on the recorded ages and must not be used as the bridge.

Identity cautions

Glasgow-1367 · updated 2026-08-13

  • Do not merge the 1834 Lisnagaver tithe occupier or 1868 death-index entry into

Robert's identity without another identifier.

  • Do not infer that Robert was Adam's son from a son also being named Robert.
  • Do not treat County Antrim and County Londonderry as interchangeable places.
  • Do not attach an American John or Samuel Glasgow using only name, Irish birth

and approximate age. The Irish return gives no state or other unique locator.

Research questionsOpen problems, missing bridges and the next records to inspect.4 open

Which records prove the subject's identity across events?

No current conclusion recorded.

Missing bridge: Not specified

Which original or indexed records identify the parents?

No current conclusion recorded.

Missing bridge: A contemporary record explicitly identifying the parent or parents.

Which spouses and children are directly supported by records?

No current conclusion recorded.

Missing bridge: Not specified

What conflicts or same-name conflations must be resolved?

No current conclusion recorded.

Missing bridge: Not specified

Next records to inspect

  1. research assessment — Bill MacAfee, North Antrim Tithe Applotment Books arranged in document order (https://www.billmacafee.com/182030stithe/tithenorthantrimrevisionorder.pdf), record 5804, Robert Glasco, Doonbought, 1825.
  2. PRONI Name — PRONI Name Search (https://apps.proni.gov.uk/ProniNames_IE/SearchPage.aspx), pre-1858 wills and administrations, Robert Glasgow of Glenleslie, 1854.
Sources and provenanceStructured citations and source-quality classifications.15 sources

Source or provenance: quality describes the record layer, not every conclusion drawn from it.

  1. derivative "1851 Irish Census Returns: comma-delimited transcription" (https://durrushistory.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/1851irishcensusreturnscommadelimitedtextfilejul24_071.pdf), Glenleslie household 23, p. 103 (accessed 16 July 2026).
  2. unknown Bill MacAfee, 1851 Census, Barony of Kilconway (https://www.billmacafee.com/census/1851censuskilconway.pdf), Glenleslie household 23.
  3. original 1851 Census of Ireland (http://www.census.nationalarchives.ie/pages/1851/Antrim/Kilconway/Dunaghy/Glenleslie/23/), Glenleslie, Dunaghy, County Antrim, household 23, Robert Glasgow household (accessed 16 July 2026).
  4. unknown Bill MacAfee, North Antrim Tithe Applotment Books arranged in document order (https://www.billmacafee.com/182030stithe/tithenorthantrimrevisionorder.pdf), record 5804, Robert Glasco, Doonbought, 1825.
  5. unknown Public Record Office of Northern Ireland, PRONI Names, Pre-1858 Wills and Admons, Connor Diocesan Wills, Robert Glasgow, Glenleslie, 1854; searched 5 August 2026 at PRONI Names (https://apps.proni.gov.uk/ProniNames_IE/SearchPage.aspx).
  6. derivative "Tamlaght O'Crilly Lower Graveyard" (https://www.oneirishrover.com/tamlaght-graveyard/), transcription and photograph of the Glasgow gravestone recording Rose, wife of Adam Glasgow; Adam Glasgow; their daughter Eliza; their son James; and grandson William Glasgow (accessed 16 July 2026).
  7. unknown County Tyrone marriage notices, 1840–1842 (https://cotyrone.com/~inthenews/marriages-notices-1840-42/); Belfast newspaper extracts, 1770–1779 (https://www.kinsleuth.com/belnews/1770-1779.htm); Tamlaght graveyard material (https://www.oneirishrover.com/tamlaght-graveyard/). None names Robert's parents or overrides the Glenleslie evidence above.
  8. original General Register Office of Ireland, civil marriage register (https://www.irishgenealogy.ie/files/civil/marriage_returns/marriages_1862/09623/5489617.pdf), Thomas Montgomery and Mary Glasgow, 13 September 1862.
  9. original General Register Office of Ireland, civil death register (https://www.irishgenealogy.ie/files/civil/deaths_returns/deaths_1898/05842/4654852.pdf), Mary Montgomery, 22 March 1898.
  10. original General Register Office of Ireland, civil marriage register (https://www.irishgenealogy.ie/files/civil/marriage_returns/marriages_1852/09422/5413278.pdf), Hugh Glasgow and Ann Wilson, 24 December 1852.
  11. original General Register Office of Ireland, civil marriage register (https://www.irishgenealogy.ie/files/civil/marriage_returns/marriages_1854/09463/5428881.pdf), William Montgomery and Eliza Glasgow, 21 August 1854.
  12. original General Register Office of Ireland, civil marriage register (https://civilrecords.irishgenealogy.ie/churchrecords/images/marriage_returns/marriages_1866/11531/8240963.pdf), Robert Glasgow and Jane Graham, 1866.
  13. unknown "Blair Extracts from the Belfast Newsletter, 1770–1779" (https://www.kinsleuth.com/belnews/1770-1779.htm), entry dated 7 April 1772, p. 3 (accessed 16 July 2026).
  14. original North Antrim tithe applotment transcription: Dunaghy parish, 1825
  15. tree_only WikiTree profile export for Glasgow-1367
Technical profile and raw captureDataset metadata, machine dossier and captured WikiTree biography.Advanced

WikiTree profile information

Dataset: ONT_Glasco_2026-08-18T16_05.json · generated 2026-08-20

Machine-readable dossier

WikiTree biography, citations and relationship snapshot

Glasgow-1367 was captured 2026-08-19T09:55:02+00:00; WikiTree profile revision 2026-08-19.

Profile location claims

EventDateLocationStatus
birthCounty Tyrone, IrelandWikiTree profile field

Immediate relationship snapshot

RelationshipPersonWikiTree IDDates and places returned
ParentsUnknown GlasgowGlasgow-39051740-00-00 · Inishrush, Tamlaght O'Crilly, County Londonderry, Ireland · 0000-00-00
ChildrenMargaret WintersGlasgow-10531801-00-00 · Dunaghy, Kilconway, Antrim · 0000-00-00
ChildrenHugh GlasgowGlasgow-39561802-00-00 · 0000-00-00
ChildrenRobert Glasgow SrGlasgow-10491811-00-00 · Donbought, Dunaghy, Antrim, Ireland · 1888-01-10 · Plainfield, Will, Illinois, United States
ChildrenWilliam GlasgowGlasgow-13871811-00-00 · Dunaghy, Killcondray, Antrim · 0000-00-00
ChildrenJohn GlasgowGlasgow-31401813-00-00 · Ireland · 0000-00-00
ChildrenUnknown YoungGlasgow-39551818-00-00 · 0000-00-00
ChildrenSamuel GlasgowGlasgow-10521822-00-00 · 0000-00-00
SiblingsAdam GlasgowGlasgow-39021758-00-00 · 1844-06-30 · Tamlaght O'Crilly, County Londonderry, Ireland
SiblingsJohn GlasgowGlasgow-39271767-00-00 · Inishrush, Tamlaght O'Crilly, County Londonderry, Ireland · 0000-00-00
SiblingsAlexander GlasgowGlasgow-39041778-00-00 · 0000-00-00
SpousesCatherine GlasgowUnknown-5408561783-00-00 · 0000-00-00 · 1803-00-00

Profile categories

Estimated_Birth_Date Glasgow Name Study Glasgow_Name_Study

Record-bearing passages

  • Biography Robert Glasgow was born about 1779 in County Antrim, Ireland. The detailed 1851 census records him as seventy-two years old and County Antrim-born. 1851 Irish Census Returns: detailed comma-delimited transcription (https://durrushistory.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/1851irishcensusreturnscommadelimitedtextfilejul24_071.pdf), Glenleslie household 23.
  • Robert married Catherine about 1803. In 1851 he was a farmer at Glenleslie and Catherine, aged sixty-eight, was spinning flax. The household included their unmarried daughter Margaret, aged fifty; grandchildren Mary and James Young, both fifteen; and Mary Glasgow, an unmarried thirty-four-year-old niece and linen weaver. Sons John, forty, and Samuel, thirty, were recorded as being in America. An infant granddaughter, Catherine Hume, had died in 1850. Bill MacAfee, 1851 Census, Barony of Kilconway (https://www.billmacafee.com/census/1851censuskilconway.pdf), Glenleslie household 23. The household also survives in the National Archives of Ireland's earlier online census presentation. National Archives of Ireland, 1851 census (http://www.census.nationalarchives.ie/pages/1851/Antrim/Kilconway/Dunaghy/Glenleslie/23/), Glenleslie household 23.
  • Robert may be the Robert Glasco recorded at Doonbought in the 1825 tithe applotment. He was about forty-six and living in the correct parish, but the entry gives no age or family relationship. Bill MacAfee, North Antrim Tithe Applotment Books arranged in document order (https://www.billmacafee.com/182030stithe/tithenorthantrimrevisionorder.pdf), record 5804, Robert Glasco, Doonbought, 1825.
  • His death has not been proved. PRONI's pre-1858 name index records a Robert Glasgow of Glenleslie in 1854, but the original will was destroyed and no text naming heirs survives. PRONI Name Search (https://apps.proni.gov.uk/ProniNames_IE/SearchPage.aspx), pre-1858 wills and administrations, Robert Glasgow of Glenleslie, 1854. Parentage Adam Glasgow and Rose of Inishrush were previously proposed as Robert's parents, but they are not retained. No inspected record identifies either parent, Rose would have been about twelve when Robert was born, and the 1851 census places Robert's birth in County Antrim rather than the documented County Londonderry cluster.
  • Adam was born about 1758 and was old enough to have a son born about 1779;

    • Adam and Rose appear to have had a large and incompletely documented family;
    • their gravestone names only some of their children;
    • Nancy Glasgow was described as Adam's sixth daughter, confirming that several children are absent from the gravestone.
  • Adam and Rose's gravestone records their children James and Eliza, but does not provide a complete list of their family. "Tamlaght O'Crilly Lower Graveyard" (https://www.oneirishrover.com/tamlaght-graveyard/), transcription and photograph of the Glasgow gravestone recording Rose, wife of Adam Glasgow; Adam Glasgow; their daughter Eliza; their son James; and grandson William Glasgow (accessed 16 July 2026).
  • A newspaper notice identifies Nancy Glasgow as Adam's sixth daughter. "Marriage Notices 1840–42" (https://cotyrone.com/~inthenews/marriages-notices-1840-42/), notice published 29 January 1842 reporting the marriage of John Kyle of Tyanee and Nancy, sixth daughter of Adam Glasgow of Inishrush, on 14 January 1842 (accessed 16 July 2026).
  • This evidence establishes that Adam had children who are absent from his gravestone. It does not identify Robert as one of those children.
  • No contemporary record explicitly names Adam or Rose as Robert's parents. Robert's parents therefore remain blank rather than attached as uncertain.
  • John Glasgow was previously proposed as Robert's father. No record has been found supporting that relationship. John may instead have been an uncle, cousin or another member of the wider Glasgow family. 1851 Census In 1851 Robert and Catherine were living at household 23 in Glenleslie, Dunaghy, County Antrim. 1851 Census of Ireland (http://www.census.nationalarchives.ie/pages/1851/Antrim/Kilconway/Dunaghy/Glenleslie/23/), Glenleslie, Dunaghy, County Antrim, household 23, Robert Glasgow household (accessed 16 July 2026). "1851 Irish Census Returns: comma-delimited transcription" (https://durrushistory.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/1851irishcensusreturnscommadelimitedtextfilejul24_071.pdf), Glenleslie household 23, p. 103 (accessed 16 July 2026).
  • {| class="wikitable sortable" style="padding: 5px; width:100%;" |+ Robert Glasgow Household, Glenleslie, 1851 |- ! style="background-color:#E1F0B4;" | Name ! style="background-color:#E1F0B4;" | Relationship ! style="background-color:#E1F0B4;" | Age ! style="background-color:#E1F0B4;" | Occupation or Status ! style="background-color:#E1F0B4;" | Notes |- | Robert Glasgow || Head || 72 || Farmer || Born County Antrim; could read; married in 1803 |- | Catherine Glasgow || Wife || 68 || Spinning flax || Born County Antrim; could read; married in 1803 |- | Margaret Glasgow || Daughter || 50 || None recorded || Unmarried; born County Antrim |- | Mary Glasgow || Niece || 34 || Linen weaver || Unmarried; born County Antrim |- | Mary Young || Granddaughter || 15 || Winding yarn || Born County Antrim |- | James Young || Grandson || 15 || Labourer || Born County Antrim; could read and write |- | Margaret McKillop || Servant || 18 || House servant || Born County Antrim |- | John Glasgow || Son || 40 || Labourer || Absent in America on census day |- | Samuel Glasgow || Son || 30 || Linen weaver || Absent in America on census day |- | Catherine Hume || Granddaughter || 3 months || Deceased || Died of scarlatina in spring 1850 |}
  • The census identifies Margaret as Robert and Catherine's daughter, Mary Glasgow as Robert's niece, and Mary Young, James Young and Catherine Hume as grandchildren.
  • The parents connecting the Young and Hume grandchildren to Robert and Catherine have not been identified. Children and Extended Family Children identified by the 1851 census included:
  • Margaret Glasgow, born about 1800 or 1801 in County Antrim;

    • John Glasgow, born about 1810 or 1811, a labourer who was in America in 1851;
    • Samuel Glasgow, born about 1820 or 1821, a linen weaver who was in America in 1851.
  • At least one additional child probably existed, because the census identifies grandchildren bearing the surnames Young and Hume whose parents are not named.
  • Mary Glasgow, born about 1816 or 1817, was Robert's niece. Her father or mother was therefore a sibling of Robert or Catherine, but the connecting relationship has not been identified. Death and Possible 1854 Probate Robert was alive when the 1851 census was taken.
  • The PRONI Names database indexes a Robert Glasgow of Glenleslie under the Connor Diocesan Wills for 1854. The townland agrees exactly with Robert's 1851 census residence. Public Record Office of Northern Ireland, PRONI Names, Pre-1858 Wills and Admons, Connor Diocesan Wills, Robert Glasgow, Glenleslie, 1854; searched 5 August 2026 at PRONI Names (https://apps.proni.gov.uk/ProniNames_IE/SearchPage.aspx).
  • PRONI states that the original document was destroyed and that no information beyond the index entry survives. The entry may represent a will, probate or related event following Robert's death, but it does not provide an exact death date, heirs or other relationships.
  • No reliable civil death registration, burial record or gravestone has been identified.
  • Robert's death should therefore be recorded cautiously as:
  • The 1854 Glenleslie will index should be retained as a likely, but not conclusive, death or probate clue. Research Notes Current evidence assessmentParents and siblings No inspected record identifies Robert's parents. Adam Glasgow and Rose were once proposed, but Robert was born when Rose was about twelve and The 1851 census places his birth in County Antrim, not their County Londonderry cluster. John Glasgow lived nearby at Glenleslie, but Robert was born about twelve years before John and Rose Alexander's reported 1791 marriage. Household proximity does not establish a father-son relationship, and Robert's parents remain blank.
  • The niece in Robert's household is probably Mary (Glasgow) Montgomery. Mary's 1862 marriage names her father as Hugh Glasgow, weaver, and her 1898 death age gives a birth about 1818, closely matching the 1851 niece. General Register Office of Ireland, civil marriage register (https://www.irishgenealogy.ie/files/civil/marriage_returns/marriages_1862/09623/5489617.pdf), Thomas Montgomery and Mary Glasgow, 13 September 1862. General Register Office of Ireland, civil death register (https://www.irishgenealogy.ie/files/civil/deaths_returns/deaths_1898/05842/4654852.pdf), Mary Montgomery, 22 March 1898. If the identity is correct, Hugh was probably Robert's brother. The link remains probable because neither record identifies Mary as the Glenleslie niece.
  • Another Hugh Glasgow, weaver, was established at Liminary in Ballyclug by the marriages of his children Hugh and Eliza. Hugh junior married Ann Wilson in 1852 and Eliza married William Montgomery in 1854; both certificates name Hugh Glasgow, weaver, as father. General Register Office of Ireland, civil marriage register (https://www.irishgenealogy.ie/files/civil/marriage_returns/marriages_1852/09422/5413278.pdf), Hugh Glasgow and Ann Wilson, 24 December 1852. General Register Office of Ireland, civil marriage register (https://www.irishgenealogy.ie/files/civil/marriage_returns/marriages_1854/09463/5428881.pdf), William Montgomery and Eliza Glasgow, 21 August 1854. Mary may have been their older sister, but the common name and occupation do not yet prove that the Liminary Hugh was Robert's brother. Children The 1851 return directly supports Margaret, John and Samuel as Robert's children. It also establishes grandchildren in Young and Hume families, though their parents are not specified. Margaret Glasgow was unmarried and living with Robert in 1851; she should not be merged with Margaret Glasgow Winters, who reportedly emigrated in 1845 and had children from 1829.
  • The younger Robert Glasgow at Doonbought in 1851 is a plausible son or close relative and may represent succession to the 1825 holding. The two census households do not state a relationship, so that attachment remains uncertain. Identity caution Robert was not the later Robert at Gortereghy. Revision books carry that holding after 1864, when this Robert would have been about eighty-five. Robert Glasgow, whose 1866 marriage names father Alexander and connects Lisnagaver with Gortereghy, is the materially better identification. General Register Office of Ireland, civil marriage register (https://civilrecords.irishgenealogy.ie/churchrecords/images/marriage_returns/marriages_1866/11531/8240963.pdf), Robert Glasgow and Jane Graham, 1866.
  • Earlier local searches also consulted published marriage notices, Belfast-area newspaper extracts and Tamlaght graveyard material. County Tyrone marriage notices, 1840–1842 (https://cotyrone.com/~inthenews/marriages-notices-1840-42/); Belfast newspaper extracts, 1770–1779 (https://www.kinsleuth.com/belnews/1770-1779.htm); Tamlaght graveyard material (https://www.oneirishrover.com/tamlaght-graveyard/). None names Robert's parents or overrides the Glenleslie evidence above. Birthplace Robert's 1851 census entry records his birthplace as County Antrim.
  • A County Tyrone birthplace has previously been reported for this profile, but no source supporting County Tyrone is cited here. Unless another record is available, County Antrim is the only documented birthplace.
  • Both the birth year and birthplace depend on the information supplied to the census enumerator and should be treated as approximate. Robert Glasgow of Coltrim Robert Glasgow of Coltrim is documented separately at Coltrim in Lissan parish between 1820 and 1831.
  • No inspected lease, church record, census record, will or other document connects the Coltrim occupier to Robert and Catherine at Glenleslie.
  • The two profiles should not be merged without new evidence directly bridging the two locations. Lisnagaver Occupier A Robert Glasgow was recorded at Lisnagaver in the 1834 Rasharkin Tithe Applotment material.
  • No age, wife, children or other identifying information connects that occupier to Robert of Glenleslie. The Lisnagaver entry should not be treated as one of Robert's residences without further evidence.
  • Thomas Glasgow, born about 1725;

    • Robert Glasgow, born about 1690 and associated with County Antrim;
    • Hugh Glasgow, born about 1706 and associated with County Tyrone;
    • Robert Glasgow, born about 1710.
  • Robert may also be the same person as Robert Glasgow, born about 1780, who is attached as a son of James Glasgow and Jean Simpson.
  • These entries demonstrate the earlier presence of men bearing the Glasgow surname. They do not establish a relationship to Robert born about 1779. Relationship Assessment Recommended WikiTree treatment:
  • The evidence presently supports Robert's immediate household relationships recorded in 1851. His parentage and wider family connections remain unproved. Further Research The most useful remaining records are:
  • church registers identifying Robert and Catherine's marriage and children;

    • valuation and estate records for Glenleslie before and after 1851;
    • civil marriage and death records for Margaret, John and Samuel;
    • passenger, census and naturalisation records for John and Samuel in America;
    • records identifying the parents of Mary and James Young;
    • records identifying the parents of Catherine Hume;
    • the surviving PRONI index material concerning the 1854 Glenleslie will;
    • wills, leases or gravestones connecting Robert to Adam Glasgow;
    • Y-DNA comparisons with documented descendants of Adam Glasgow's proposed sons. Sources

Profile source citations

  1. 1851 Irish Census Returns: detailed comma-delimited transcription (https://durrushistory.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/1851irishcensusreturnscommadelimitedtextfilejul24_071.pdf), Glenleslie household 23. source link 1
  2. Bill MacAfee, 1851 Census, Barony of Kilconway (https://www.billmacafee.com/census/1851censuskilconway.pdf), Glenleslie household 23. source link 1
  3. National Archives of Ireland, 1851 census (http://www.census.nationalarchives.ie/pages/1851/Antrim/Kilconway/Dunaghy/Glenleslie/23/), Glenleslie household 23. source link 1
  4. Bill MacAfee, North Antrim Tithe Applotment Books arranged in document order (https://www.billmacafee.com/182030stithe/tithenorthantrimrevisionorder.pdf), record 5804, Robert Glasco, Doonbought, 1825. source link 1
  5. PRONI Name Search (https://apps.proni.gov.uk/ProniNames_IE/SearchPage.aspx), pre-1858 wills and administrations, Robert Glasgow of Glenleslie, 1854. source link 1
  6. "Tamlaght O'Crilly Lower Graveyard" (https://www.oneirishrover.com/tamlaght-graveyard/), transcription and photograph of the Glasgow gravestone recording Rose, wife of Adam Glasgow; Adam Glasgow; their daughter Eliza; their son James; and grandson William Glasgow (accessed 16 July 2026). source link 1
  7. "Marriage Notices 1840–42" (https://cotyrone.com/~inthenews/marriages-notices-1840-42/), notice published 29 January 1842 reporting the marriage of John Kyle of Tyanee and Nancy, sixth daughter of Adam Glasgow of Inishrush, on 14 January 1842 (accessed 16 July 2026). source link 1
  8. 1851 Census of Ireland (http://www.census.nationalarchives.ie/pages/1851/Antrim/Kilconway/Dunaghy/Glenleslie/23/), Glenleslie, Dunaghy, County Antrim, household 23, Robert Glasgow household (accessed 16 July 2026). source link 1
  9. "1851 Irish Census Returns: comma-delimited transcription" (https://durrushistory.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/1851irishcensusreturnscommadelimitedtextfilejul24_071.pdf), Glenleslie household 23, p. 103 (accessed 16 July 2026). source link 1
  10. Public Record Office of Northern Ireland, PRONI Names, Pre-1858 Wills and Admons, Connor Diocesan Wills, Robert Glasgow, Glenleslie, 1854; searched 5 August 2026 at PRONI Names (https://apps.proni.gov.uk/ProniNames_IE/SearchPage.aspx). source link 1
  11. General Register Office of Ireland, civil marriage register (https://www.irishgenealogy.ie/files/civil/marriage_returns/marriages_1862/09623/5489617.pdf), Thomas Montgomery and Mary Glasgow, 13 September 1862. source link 1
  12. General Register Office of Ireland, civil death register (https://www.irishgenealogy.ie/files/civil/deaths_returns/deaths_1898/05842/4654852.pdf), Mary Montgomery, 22 March 1898. source link 1
  13. General Register Office of Ireland, civil marriage register (https://www.irishgenealogy.ie/files/civil/marriage_returns/marriages_1852/09422/5413278.pdf), Hugh Glasgow and Ann Wilson, 24 December 1852. source link 1
  14. General Register Office of Ireland, civil marriage register (https://www.irishgenealogy.ie/files/civil/marriage_returns/marriages_1854/09463/5428881.pdf), William Montgomery and Eliza Glasgow, 21 August 1854. source link 1
  15. General Register Office of Ireland, civil marriage register (https://civilrecords.irishgenealogy.ie/churchrecords/images/marriage_returns/marriages_1866/11531/8240963.pdf), Robert Glasgow and Jane Graham, 1866. source link 1
  16. County Tyrone marriage notices, 1840–1842 (https://cotyrone.com/~inthenews/marriages-notices-1840-42/); Belfast newspaper extracts, 1770–1779 (https://www.kinsleuth.com/belnews/1770-1779.htm); Tamlaght graveyard material (https://www.oneirishrover.com/tamlaght-graveyard/). None names Robert's parents or overrides the Glenleslie evidence above. source link 1 source link 2 source link 3
  17. "Blair Extracts from the Belfast Newsletter, 1770–1779" (https://www.kinsleuth.com/belnews/1770-1779.htm), entry dated 7 April 1772, p. 3 (accessed 16 July 2026). source link 1
Full captured biography text
Biography
Robert Glasgow was born about 1779 in County Antrim, Ireland. The detailed
1851 census records him as seventy-two years old and County Antrim-born. 1851 Irish Census Returns: detailed comma-delimited transcription (https://durrushistory.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/1851irishcensusreturnscommadelimitedtextfilejul24_071.pdf), Glenleslie household 23. 

Robert married Catherine about 1803. In 1851 he was a farmer at Glenleslie and
Catherine, aged sixty-eight, was spinning flax. The household included their
unmarried daughter Margaret, aged fifty; grandchildren Mary and James Young,
both fifteen; and Mary Glasgow, an unmarried thirty-four-year-old niece and
linen weaver. Sons John, forty, and Samuel, thirty, were recorded as being in
America. An infant granddaughter, Catherine Hume, had died in 1850. Bill MacAfee, 1851 Census, Barony of Kilconway (https://www.billmacafee.com/census/1851censuskilconway.pdf), Glenleslie household 23. 
The household also survives in the National Archives of Ireland's earlier
online census presentation. National Archives of Ireland, 1851 census (http://www.census.nationalarchives.ie/pages/1851/Antrim/Kilconway/Dunaghy/Glenleslie/23/), Glenleslie household 23. 

Robert may be the Robert Glasco recorded at Doonbought in the 1825 tithe
applotment. He was about forty-six and living in the correct parish, but the
entry gives no age or family relationship. Bill MacAfee, North Antrim Tithe Applotment Books arranged in document order (https://www.billmacafee.com/182030stithe/tithenorthantrimrevisionorder.pdf), record 5804, Robert Glasco, Doonbought, 1825. 

His death has not been proved. PRONI's pre-1858 name index records a Robert
Glasgow of Glenleslie in 1854, but the original will was destroyed and no text
naming heirs survives. PRONI Name Search (https://apps.proni.gov.uk/ProniNames_IE/SearchPage.aspx), pre-1858 wills and administrations, Robert Glasgow of Glenleslie, 1854. 
Parentage
Adam Glasgow and Rose of Inishrush were previously proposed as Robert's parents, but they are not retained. No inspected record identifies either parent, Rose would have been about twelve when Robert was born, and the 1851 census places Robert's birth in County Antrim rather than the documented County Londonderry cluster.

The proposed relationship is based on limited indirect evidence:

* Adam was born about 1758 and was old enough to have a son born about 1779;
* Adam and Rose appear to have had a large and incompletely documented family;
* their gravestone names only some of their children;
* Nancy Glasgow was described as Adam's sixth daughter, confirming that several children are absent from the gravestone.

Adam and Rose's gravestone records their children James and Eliza, but does not provide a complete list of their family. "Tamlaght O'Crilly Lower Graveyard" (https://www.oneirishrover.com/tamlaght-graveyard/), transcription and photograph of the Glasgow gravestone recording Rose, wife of Adam Glasgow; Adam Glasgow; their daughter Eliza; their son James; and grandson William Glasgow (accessed 16 July 2026). 

A newspaper notice identifies Nancy Glasgow as Adam's sixth daughter. "Marriage Notices 1840–42" (https://cotyrone.com/~inthenews/marriages-notices-1840-42/), notice published 29 January 1842 reporting the marriage of John Kyle of Tyanee and Nancy, sixth daughter of Adam Glasgow of Inishrush, on 14 January 1842 (accessed 16 July 2026). 

This evidence establishes that Adam had children who are absent from his gravestone. It does not identify Robert as one of those children.

No contemporary record explicitly names Adam or Rose as Robert's parents. Robert's parents therefore remain blank rather than attached as uncertain.

John Glasgow was previously proposed as Robert's father. No record has been found supporting that relationship. John may instead have been an uncle, cousin or another member of the wider Glasgow family.
1851 Census
In 1851 Robert and Catherine were living at household 23 in Glenleslie, Dunaghy, County Antrim. 1851 Census of Ireland (http://www.census.nationalarchives.ie/pages/1851/Antrim/Kilconway/Dunaghy/Glenleslie/23/), Glenleslie, Dunaghy, County Antrim, household 23, Robert Glasgow household (accessed 16 July 2026). "1851 Irish Census Returns: comma-delimited transcription" (https://durrushistory.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/1851irishcensusreturnscommadelimitedtextfilejul24_071.pdf), Glenleslie household 23, p. 103 (accessed 16 July 2026). 

{| class="wikitable sortable" style="padding: 5px; width:100%;"
|+ Robert Glasgow Household, Glenleslie, 1851
|-
! style="background-color:#E1F0B4;" | Name
! style="background-color:#E1F0B4;" | Relationship
! style="background-color:#E1F0B4;" | Age
! style="background-color:#E1F0B4;" | Occupation or Status
! style="background-color:#E1F0B4;" | Notes
|-
| Robert Glasgow || Head || 72 || Farmer || Born County Antrim; could read; married in 1803
|-
| Catherine Glasgow || Wife || 68 || Spinning flax || Born County Antrim; could read; married in 1803
|-
| Margaret Glasgow || Daughter || 50 || None recorded || Unmarried; born County Antrim
|-
| Mary Glasgow || Niece || 34 || Linen weaver || Unmarried; born County Antrim
|-
| Mary Young || Granddaughter || 15 || Winding yarn || Born County Antrim
|-
| James Young || Grandson || 15 || Labourer || Born County Antrim; could read and write
|-
| Margaret McKillop || Servant || 18 || House servant || Born County Antrim
|-
| John Glasgow || Son || 40 || Labourer || Absent in America on census day
|-
| Samuel Glasgow || Son || 30 || Linen weaver || Absent in America on census day
|-
| Catherine Hume || Granddaughter || 3 months || Deceased || Died of scarlatina in spring 1850
|}

The census identifies Margaret as Robert and Catherine's daughter, Mary Glasgow as Robert's niece, and Mary Young, James Young and Catherine Hume as grandchildren.

The parents connecting the Young and Hume grandchildren to Robert and Catherine have not been identified.
Children and Extended Family
Children identified by the 1851 census included:

* Margaret Glasgow, born about 1800 or 1801 in County Antrim;
* John Glasgow, born about 1810 or 1811, a labourer who was in America in 1851;
* Samuel Glasgow, born about 1820 or 1821, a linen weaver who was in America in 1851.

At least one additional child probably existed, because the census identifies grandchildren bearing the surnames Young and Hume whose parents are not named.

Mary Glasgow, born about 1816 or 1817, was Robert's niece. Her father or mother was therefore a sibling of Robert or Catherine, but the connecting relationship has not been identified.
Death and Possible 1854 Probate
Robert was alive when the 1851 census was taken.

The PRONI Names database indexes a Robert Glasgow of Glenleslie under the Connor Diocesan Wills for 1854. The townland agrees exactly with Robert's 1851 census residence. Public Record Office of Northern Ireland, PRONI Names, Pre-1858 Wills and Admons, Connor Diocesan Wills, Robert Glasgow, Glenleslie, 1854; searched 5 August 2026 at PRONI Names (https://apps.proni.gov.uk/ProniNames_IE/SearchPage.aspx). 

PRONI states that the original document was destroyed and that no information beyond the index entry survives. The entry may represent a will, probate or related event following Robert's death, but it does not provide an exact death date, heirs or other relationships.

No reliable civil death registration, burial record or gravestone has been identified.

Robert's death should therefore be recorded cautiously as:

* Date: after 1851;
* Place: unknown.

The 1854 Glenleslie will index should be retained as a likely, but not conclusive, death or probate clue.
Research Notes
Current evidence assessmentParents and siblings
No inspected record identifies Robert's parents. Adam Glasgow
and Rose were once proposed, but Robert was born when Rose was about twelve and
The 1851 census places his birth in County Antrim, not their County Londonderry
cluster. John Glasgow lived nearby at Glenleslie, but Robert was
born about twelve years before John and Rose Alexander's reported 1791 marriage.
Household proximity does not establish a father-son relationship, and Robert's
parents remain blank.

The niece in Robert's household is probably Mary (Glasgow)
Montgomery. Mary's 1862 marriage names her father as Hugh Glasgow,
weaver, and her 1898 death age gives a birth about 1818, closely matching the
1851 niece. General Register Office of Ireland, civil marriage register (https://www.irishgenealogy.ie/files/civil/marriage_returns/marriages_1862/09623/5489617.pdf), Thomas Montgomery and Mary Glasgow, 13 September 1862. General Register Office of Ireland, civil death register (https://www.irishgenealogy.ie/files/civil/deaths_returns/deaths_1898/05842/4654852.pdf), Mary Montgomery, 22 March 1898. If the identity is correct, Hugh was probably Robert's brother. The link remains probable because neither record identifies Mary as the Glenleslie niece.

Another Hugh Glasgow, weaver, was established at Liminary in Ballyclug by the
marriages of his children Hugh and Eliza. Hugh junior married Ann Wilson in
1852 and Eliza married William Montgomery in 1854; both certificates name Hugh
Glasgow, weaver, as father. General Register Office of Ireland, civil marriage register (https://www.irishgenealogy.ie/files/civil/marriage_returns/marriages_1852/09422/5413278.pdf), Hugh Glasgow and Ann Wilson, 24 December 1852. General Register Office of Ireland, civil marriage register (https://www.irishgenealogy.ie/files/civil/marriage_returns/marriages_1854/09463/5428881.pdf), William Montgomery and Eliza Glasgow, 21 August 1854. Mary may have been their older sister, but the common name and occupation do not yet prove that the Liminary Hugh was Robert's brother.
Children
The 1851 return directly supports Margaret, John and Samuel as Robert's
children. It also establishes grandchildren in Young and Hume families, though
their parents are not specified. Margaret Glasgow was unmarried
and living with Robert in 1851; she should not be merged with Margaret Glasgow
Winters, who reportedly emigrated in 1845 and had children from 1829.

The younger Robert Glasgow at Doonbought in 1851 is a plausible
son or close relative and may represent succession to the 1825 holding. The two
census households do not state a relationship, so that attachment remains
uncertain.
Identity caution
Robert was not the later Robert at Gortereghy. Revision books carry that holding
after 1864, when this Robert would have been about eighty-five. Robert
Glasgow, whose 1866 marriage names father Alexander and connects Lisnagaver
with Gortereghy, is the materially better identification. General Register Office of Ireland, civil marriage register (https://civilrecords.irishgenealogy.ie/churchrecords/images/marriage_returns/marriages_1866/11531/8240963.pdf), Robert Glasgow and Jane Graham, 1866. 

Earlier local searches also consulted published marriage notices, Belfast-area
newspaper extracts and Tamlaght graveyard material. County Tyrone marriage notices, 1840–1842 (https://cotyrone.com/~inthenews/marriages-notices-1840-42/); Belfast newspaper extracts, 1770–1779 (https://www.kinsleuth.com/belnews/1770-1779.htm); Tamlaght graveyard material (https://www.oneirishrover.com/tamlaght-graveyard/). None names Robert's parents or overrides the Glenleslie evidence above. 
Birthplace
Robert's 1851 census entry records his birthplace as County Antrim.

A County Tyrone birthplace has previously been reported for this profile, but no source supporting County Tyrone is cited here. Unless another record is available, County Antrim is the only documented birthplace.

Both the birth year and birthplace depend on the information supplied to the census enumerator and should be treated as approximate.
Robert Glasgow of Coltrim
Robert Glasgow of Coltrim is documented separately at Coltrim in Lissan parish between 1820 and 1831.

No inspected lease, church record, census record, will or other document connects the Coltrim occupier to Robert and Catherine at Glenleslie.

The two profiles should not be merged without new evidence directly bridging the two locations.
Lisnagaver Occupier
A Robert Glasgow was recorded at Lisnagaver in the 1834 Rasharkin Tithe Applotment material.

No age, wife, children or other identifying information connects that occupier to Robert of Glenleslie. The Lisnagaver entry should not be treated as one of Robert's residences without further evidence.

Robert should not be attached as the father of the older John and Samuel Glasgow associated with Lisnagaver. Those men were approximately twenty years older than Robert and Catherine's sons of the same names.
Possible Earlier Family Lines
Several earlier Glasgow profiles have been considered as possible relatives:

* Thomas Glasgow, born about 1725;
* Robert Glasgow, born about 1690 and associated with County Antrim;
* Hugh Glasgow, born about 1706 and associated with County Tyrone;
* Robert Glasgow, born about 1710.

No documentary chain has been found connecting Robert to any of these men.

Robert may also be the same person as Robert Glasgow, born about 1780, who is attached as a son of James Glasgow and Jean Simpson.

That identification remains unproved. A merge should not be attempted without evidence connecting the other Robert to Catherine or to the Glenleslie household.

Reported Family Tree DNA relationship distances of RDist 3 and GDist 6 to that branch are research clues rather than proof of a paper-trail relationship.
Belfast Newsletter Extracts
The Blair extracts from the Belfast Newsletter include the following Glasgow names on 7 April 1772:

* William Glasgow;
* John Glasgow;
* James Glasgow;
* Robert Glasgow. "Blair Extracts from the Belfast Newsletter, 1770–1779" (https://www.kinsleuth.com/belnews/1770-1779.htm), entry dated 7 April 1772, p. 3 (accessed 16 July 2026). 

These entries demonstrate the earlier presence of men bearing the Glasgow surname. They do not establish a relationship to Robert born about 1779.
Relationship Assessment
Recommended WikiTree treatment:

* Adam Glasgow — former father hypothesis, not retained;
* Rose Unknown — excluded as mother by chronology;
* Catherine Unknown — wife;
* Margaret Glasgow — daughter;
* John Glasgow — son;
* Samuel Glasgow — son;
* Mary Glasgow — niece, parents unknown;
* Mary Young — granddaughter, parents unknown;
* James Young — grandson, parents unknown;
* Catherine Hume — granddaughter, parents unknown.

The evidence presently supports Robert's immediate household relationships recorded in 1851. His parentage and wider family connections remain unproved.
Further Research
The most useful remaining records are:

* church registers identifying Robert and Catherine's marriage and children;
* valuation and estate records for Glenleslie before and after 1851;
* civil marriage and death records for Margaret, John and Samuel;
* passenger, census and naturalisation records for John and Samuel in America;
* records identifying the parents of Mary and James Young;
* records identifying the parents of Catherine Hume;
* the surviving PRONI index material concerning the 1854 Glenleslie will;
* wills, leases or gravestones connecting Robert to Adam Glasgow;
* Y-DNA comparisons with documented descendants of Adam Glasgow's proposed sons.
Sources
Raw WikiTree biography markup
{{Estimated Date}}
[[Category:Glasgow Name Study]]

== Biography ==
{{Ireland Native}}
{{Occupation|image=Wikimedia_Commons_photos-3.jpg|text=was a farmer}}
'''Robert Glasgow''' was born about 1779 in County Antrim, Ireland. The detailed
1851 census records him as seventy-two years old and County Antrim-born.<ref name="Robert1851Detailed">[https://durrushistory.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/1851irishcensusreturnscommadelimitedtextfilejul24_071.pdf ''1851 Irish Census Returns: detailed comma-delimited transcription''], Glenleslie household 23.</ref>

Robert married Catherine about 1803. In 1851 he was a farmer at Glenleslie and
Catherine, aged sixty-eight, was spinning flax. The household included their
unmarried daughter Margaret, aged fifty; grandchildren Mary and James Young,
both fifteen; and Mary Glasgow, an unmarried thirty-four-year-old niece and
linen weaver. Sons John, forty, and Samuel, thirty, were recorded as being in
America. An infant granddaughter, Catherine Hume, had died in 1850.<ref name="Robert1851Macafee">[https://www.billmacafee.com/census/1851censuskilconway.pdf Bill MacAfee, ''1851 Census, Barony of Kilconway''], Glenleslie household 23.</ref>
The household also survives in the National Archives of Ireland's earlier
online census presentation.<ref name="Robert1851NAI">[http://www.census.nationalarchives.ie/pages/1851/Antrim/Kilconway/Dunaghy/Glenleslie/23/ National Archives of Ireland, 1851 census], Glenleslie household 23.</ref>

Robert may be the Robert Glasco recorded at Doonbought in the 1825 tithe
applotment. He was about forty-six and living in the correct parish, but the
entry gives no age or family relationship.<ref name="Doonbought1825">[https://www.billmacafee.com/182030stithe/tithenorthantrimrevisionorder.pdf Bill MacAfee, ''North Antrim Tithe Applotment Books arranged in document order''], record 5804, Robert Glasco, Doonbought, 1825.</ref>

His death has not been proved. PRONI's pre-1858 name index records a Robert
Glasgow of Glenleslie in 1854, but the original will was destroyed and no text
naming heirs survives.<ref name="RobertWillIndex">[https://apps.proni.gov.uk/ProniNames_IE/SearchPage.aspx PRONI Name Search], pre-1858 wills and administrations, Robert Glasgow of Glenleslie, 1854.</ref>

=== Parentage ===

[[Glasgow-3902|Adam Glasgow]] and Rose of Inishrush were previously proposed as Robert's parents, but they are not retained. No inspected record identifies either parent, Rose would have been about twelve when Robert was born, and the 1851 census places Robert's birth in County Antrim rather than the documented County Londonderry cluster.

The proposed relationship is based on limited indirect evidence:

* Adam was born about 1758 and was old enough to have a son born about 1779;
* Adam and Rose appear to have had a large and incompletely documented family;
* their gravestone names only some of their children;
* Nancy Glasgow was described as Adam's sixth daughter, confirming that several children are absent from the gravestone.

Adam and Rose's gravestone records their children James and Eliza, but does not provide a complete list of their family.<ref name="AdamGrave">[https://www.oneirishrover.com/tamlaght-graveyard/ "Tamlaght O'Crilly Lower Graveyard"], transcription and photograph of the Glasgow gravestone recording Rose, wife of Adam Glasgow; Adam Glasgow; their daughter Eliza; their son James; and grandson William Glasgow (accessed 16 July 2026).</ref>

A newspaper notice identifies Nancy Glasgow as Adam's sixth daughter.<ref name="NancyMarriage">[https://cotyrone.com/~inthenews/marriages-notices-1840-42/ "Marriage Notices 1840–42"], notice published 29 January 1842 reporting the marriage of John Kyle of Tyanee and Nancy, sixth daughter of Adam Glasgow of Inishrush, on 14 January 1842 (accessed 16 July 2026).</ref>

This evidence establishes that Adam had children who are absent from his gravestone. It does not identify Robert as one of those children.

No contemporary record explicitly names Adam or Rose as Robert's parents. Robert's parents therefore remain blank rather than attached as uncertain.

[[Glasgow-1022|John Glasgow]] was previously proposed as Robert's father. No record has been found supporting that relationship. John may instead have been an uncle, cousin or another member of the wider Glasgow family.

=== 1851 Census ===

In 1851 Robert and Catherine were living at household 23 in Glenleslie, Dunaghy, County Antrim.<ref name="Census1851">[http://www.census.nationalarchives.ie/pages/1851/Antrim/Kilconway/Dunaghy/Glenleslie/23/ 1851 Census of Ireland], Glenleslie, Dunaghy, County Antrim, household 23, Robert Glasgow household (accessed 16 July 2026).</ref><ref name="CensusTranscript">[https://durrushistory.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/1851irishcensusreturnscommadelimitedtextfilejul24_071.pdf "1851 Irish Census Returns: comma-delimited transcription"], Glenleslie household 23, p. 103 (accessed 16 July 2026).</ref>

{| class="wikitable sortable" style="padding: 5px; width:100%;"
|+ '''Robert Glasgow Household, Glenleslie, 1851'''
|-
! style="background-color:#E1F0B4;" | Name
! style="background-color:#E1F0B4;" | Relationship
! style="background-color:#E1F0B4;" | Age
! style="background-color:#E1F0B4;" | Occupation or Status
! style="background-color:#E1F0B4;" | Notes
|-
| '''Robert Glasgow''' || Head || 72 || Farmer || Born County Antrim; could read; married in 1803
|-
| '''Catherine Glasgow''' || Wife || 68 || Spinning flax || Born County Antrim; could read; married in 1803
|-
| '''Margaret Glasgow''' || Daughter || 50 || None recorded || Unmarried; born County Antrim
|-
| '''Mary Glasgow''' || Niece || 34 || Linen weaver || Unmarried; born County Antrim
|-
| '''Mary Young''' || Granddaughter || 15 || Winding yarn || Born County Antrim
|-
| '''James Young''' || Grandson || 15 || Labourer || Born County Antrim; could read and write
|-
| '''Margaret McKillop''' || Servant || 18 || House servant || Born County Antrim
|-
| '''John Glasgow''' || Son || 40 || Labourer || Absent in America on census day
|-
| '''Samuel Glasgow''' || Son || 30 || Linen weaver || Absent in America on census day
|-
| '''Catherine Hume''' || Granddaughter || 3 months || Deceased || Died of scarlatina in spring 1850
|}

The census identifies Margaret as Robert and Catherine's daughter, Mary Glasgow as Robert's niece, and Mary Young, James Young and Catherine Hume as grandchildren.

The parents connecting the Young and Hume grandchildren to Robert and Catherine have not been identified.

=== Children and Extended Family ===

Children identified by the 1851 census included:

* '''Margaret Glasgow''', born about 1800 or 1801 in County Antrim;
* '''John Glasgow''', born about 1810 or 1811, a labourer who was in America in 1851;
* '''Samuel Glasgow''', born about 1820 or 1821, a linen weaver who was in America in 1851.

At least one additional child probably existed, because the census identifies grandchildren bearing the surnames Young and Hume whose parents are not named.

'''Mary Glasgow''', born about 1816 or 1817, was Robert's niece. Her father or mother was therefore a sibling of Robert or Catherine, but the connecting relationship has not been identified.

=== Death and Possible 1854 Probate ===

Robert was alive when the 1851 census was taken.

The PRONI Names database indexes a Robert Glasgow of Glenleslie under the Connor Diocesan Wills for 1854. The townland agrees exactly with Robert's 1851 census residence.<ref name="RobertGlenleslieWill">Public Record Office of Northern Ireland, PRONI Names, ''Pre-1858 Wills and Admons'', Connor Diocesan Wills, Robert Glasgow, Glenleslie, 1854; searched 5 August 2026 at [https://apps.proni.gov.uk/ProniNames_IE/SearchPage.aspx PRONI Names].</ref>

PRONI states that the original document was destroyed and that no information beyond the index entry survives. The entry may represent a will, probate or related event following Robert's death, but it does not provide an exact death date, heirs or other relationships.

No reliable civil death registration, burial record or gravestone has been identified.

Robert's death should therefore be recorded cautiously as:

* '''Date:''' after 1851;
* '''Place:''' unknown.

The 1854 Glenleslie will index should be retained as a likely, but not conclusive, death or probate clue.

== Research Notes ==
=== Current evidence assessment ===

==== Parents and siblings ====
No inspected record identifies Robert's parents. [[Glasgow-3902|Adam Glasgow]]
and Rose were once proposed, but Robert was born when Rose was about twelve and
The 1851 census places his birth in County Antrim, not their County Londonderry
cluster. [[Glasgow-1022|John Glasgow]] lived nearby at Glenleslie, but Robert was
born about twelve years before John and Rose Alexander's reported 1791 marriage.
Household proximity does not establish a father-son relationship, and Robert's
parents remain blank.

The niece in Robert's household is probably [[Glasgow-3957|Mary (Glasgow)
Montgomery]]. Mary's 1862 marriage names her father as '''Hugh Glasgow,
weaver''', and her 1898 death age gives a birth about 1818, closely matching the
1851 niece.<ref name="MaryMarriage1862">[https://www.irishgenealogy.ie/files/civil/marriage_returns/marriages_1862/09623/5489617.pdf General Register Office of Ireland, civil marriage register], Thomas Montgomery and Mary Glasgow, 13 September 1862.</ref><ref name="MaryDeath1898">[https://www.irishgenealogy.ie/files/civil/deaths_returns/deaths_1898/05842/4654852.pdf General Register Office of Ireland, civil death register], Mary Montgomery, 22 March 1898.</ref> If the identity is correct, Hugh was probably Robert's brother. The link remains probable because neither record identifies Mary as the Glenleslie niece.

Another Hugh Glasgow, weaver, was established at Liminary in Ballyclug by the
marriages of his children Hugh and Eliza. Hugh junior married Ann Wilson in
1852 and Eliza married William Montgomery in 1854; both certificates name Hugh
Glasgow, weaver, as father.<ref name="HughMarriage1852">[https://www.irishgenealogy.ie/files/civil/marriage_returns/marriages_1852/09422/5413278.pdf General Register Office of Ireland, civil marriage register], Hugh Glasgow and Ann Wilson, 24 December 1852.</ref><ref name="ElizaMarriage1854">[https://www.irishgenealogy.ie/files/civil/marriage_returns/marriages_1854/09463/5428881.pdf General Register Office of Ireland, civil marriage register], William Montgomery and Eliza Glasgow, 21 August 1854.</ref> Mary may have been their older sister, but the common name and occupation do not yet prove that the Liminary Hugh was Robert's brother.

==== Children ====
The 1851 return directly supports Margaret, John and Samuel as Robert's
children. It also establishes grandchildren in Young and Hume families, though
their parents are not specified. [[Glasgow-1053|Margaret Glasgow]] was unmarried
and living with Robert in 1851; she should not be merged with Margaret Glasgow
Winters, who reportedly emigrated in 1845 and had children from 1829.

The younger [[Glasgow-1049|Robert Glasgow]] at Doonbought in 1851 is a plausible
son or close relative and may represent succession to the 1825 holding. The two
census households do not state a relationship, so that attachment remains
uncertain.

==== Identity caution ====
Robert was not the later Robert at Gortereghy. Revision books carry that holding
after 1864, when this Robert would have been about eighty-five. [[Glasgow-938|Robert
Glasgow]], whose 1866 marriage names father Alexander and connects Lisnagaver
with Gortereghy, is the materially better identification.<ref name="Robert938Marriage">[https://civilrecords.irishgenealogy.ie/churchrecords/images/marriage_returns/marriages_1866/11531/8240963.pdf General Register Office of Ireland, civil marriage register], Robert Glasgow and Jane Graham, 1866.</ref>

Earlier local searches also consulted published marriage notices, Belfast-area
newspaper extracts and Tamlaght graveyard material.<ref name="LocalSearches">[https://cotyrone.com/~inthenews/marriages-notices-1840-42/ County Tyrone marriage notices, 1840–1842]; [https://www.kinsleuth.com/belnews/1770-1779.htm Belfast newspaper extracts, 1770–1779]; [https://www.oneirishrover.com/tamlaght-graveyard/ Tamlaght graveyard material]. None names Robert's parents or overrides the Glenleslie evidence above.</ref>

=== Birthplace ===

Robert's 1851 census entry records his birthplace as County Antrim.

A County Tyrone birthplace has previously been reported for this profile, but no source supporting County Tyrone is cited here. Unless another record is available, County Antrim is the only documented birthplace.

Both the birth year and birthplace depend on the information supplied to the census enumerator and should be treated as approximate.

=== Robert Glasgow of Coltrim ===

[[Glasgow-3941|Robert Glasgow of Coltrim]] is documented separately at Coltrim in Lissan parish between 1820 and 1831.

No inspected lease, church record, census record, will or other document connects the Coltrim occupier to Robert and Catherine at Glenleslie.

The two profiles should not be merged without new evidence directly bridging the two locations.

=== Lisnagaver Occupier ===

A Robert Glasgow was recorded at Lisnagaver in the 1834 Rasharkin Tithe Applotment material.

No age, wife, children or other identifying information connects that occupier to Robert of Glenleslie. The Lisnagaver entry should not be treated as one of Robert's residences without further evidence.

Robert should not be attached as the father of the older John and Samuel Glasgow associated with Lisnagaver. Those men were approximately twenty years older than Robert and Catherine's sons of the same names.

=== Possible Earlier Family Lines ===

Several earlier Glasgow profiles have been considered as possible relatives:

* [[Glasgow-1023|Thomas Glasgow]], born about 1725;
* [[Glasgow-1502|Robert Glasgow]], born about 1690 and associated with County Antrim;
* [[Glasgow-548|Hugh Glasgow]], born about 1706 and associated with County Tyrone;
* [[Glasgow-1143|Robert Glasgow]], born about 1710.

No documentary chain has been found connecting Robert to any of these men.

Robert may also be the same person as [[Glasgow-2963|Robert Glasgow]], born about 1780, who is attached as a son of [[Glasgow-1142|James Glasgow]] and [[Simpson-19200|Jean Simpson]].

That identification remains unproved. A merge should not be attempted without evidence connecting the other Robert to Catherine or to the Glenleslie household.

Reported Family Tree DNA relationship distances of RDist 3 and GDist 6 to that branch are research clues rather than proof of a paper-trail relationship.

=== Belfast Newsletter Extracts ===

The Blair extracts from the ''Belfast Newsletter'' include the following Glasgow names on 7 April 1772:

* William Glasgow;
* John Glasgow;
* James Glasgow;
* Robert Glasgow.<ref name="BelfastNewsletter">[https://www.kinsleuth.com/belnews/1770-1779.htm "Blair Extracts from the Belfast Newsletter, 1770–1779"], entry dated 7 April 1772, p. 3 (accessed 16 July 2026).</ref>

These entries demonstrate the earlier presence of men bearing the Glasgow surname. They do not establish a relationship to Robert born about 1779.

=== Relationship Assessment ===

Recommended WikiTree treatment:

* Adam Glasgow — former father hypothesis, not retained;
* Rose Unknown — excluded as mother by chronology;
* Catherine Unknown — wife;
* Margaret Glasgow — daughter;
* John Glasgow — son;
* Samuel Glasgow — son;
* Mary Glasgow — niece, parents unknown;
* Mary Young — granddaughter, parents unknown;
* James Young — grandson, parents unknown;
* Catherine Hume — granddaughter, parents unknown.

The evidence presently supports Robert's immediate household relationships recorded in 1851. His parentage and wider family connections remain unproved.

=== Further Research ===

The most useful remaining records are:

* church registers identifying Robert and Catherine's marriage and children;
* valuation and estate records for Glenleslie before and after 1851;
* civil marriage and death records for Margaret, John and Samuel;
* passenger, census and naturalisation records for John and Samuel in America;
* records identifying the parents of Mary and James Young;
* records identifying the parents of Catherine Hume;
* the surviving PRONI index material concerning the 1854 Glenleslie will;
* wills, leases or gravestones connecting Robert to Adam Glasgow;
* Y-DNA comparisons with documented descendants of Adam Glasgow's proposed sons.

== Sources ==
<references />