Individual research record
William Glasgow
c. 1811 – ?
Glasgow-1387 · 2 mapped associations
At a glance
Identity & family
Tree links organise the family; documentary status still varies.
- Birth
- c. 1811 · Dunaghy, Killcondray, Antrim
- Death
- Not recorded · Place not recorded
- Parents
- Robert Glasgowuncertain
- Spouses
- Ellin (Unknown) Glasgow
- Children
- Adam GlasgowBetty GlasgowEllin GlasgowJames GlasgowJane GlasgowMargaret GlasgowRobert GlasgowWilliam Glasgow
- Gender
- Male
- WikiTree
- Glasgow-1387
- Research clusters
- East Antrim/Kilwaughter cluster
- Mapped descendants
- 11
Comparison context
These child positions and checks are the subject details used to rank possible parents below.
Naming sequence used by the parentage model
Known-position checks: 0 support · 2 conflict. Ordinals retain unnamed children and recognise reused names.
Relationship comparison
Potential parents or duplicates
Compare scored leads with the subject details above—not proof.
Possible fathers5 leads
Possible Father
John GlasgowGlasgow-822
- plausible 44-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- known spouse Mary Arthur had a plausible maternal age (37) at the subject's birth (+7)
- 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming
a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving)
Show complete scoring
- plausible 44-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 70 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1837), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- mapped Inishrush is 22.1 km from the subject's birth-period Dunaghy civil parish — County Antrim (+1; one or both placements are unproved)
- subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1799–1815) (+6; other parent Mary Arthur)
- known spouse Mary Arthur had a plausible maternal age (37) at the subject's birth (+7)
- uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Adam +14 (15 public profiles; subject branch: Adam Glasgow; candidate branch: Adam Glasgow, Adam Glasgow; +2 repetition bonus); Jane +5 (71 public profiles; subject branch: Jane Glasgow; candidate branch: Jane Florence Glasgow, Jane Glasgow; +2 repetition bonus) (+23 total including +4 multi-name bonus)
- 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming
Deductions and cautions: a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving)
Possible Father
Samuel GlasgowGlasgow-2908
- plausible 20-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- 4 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+8): collateral network, household chronology, locality, naming
- candidate's birth is 46 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1837), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving)
Show complete scoring
- plausible 20-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 46 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1837), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- mapped Lisnagaver townland is 16.5 km from the subject's birth-period Dunaghy civil parish — County Antrim (+1; one or both placements are unproved)
- shared recorded occupation: weaver (+3; weak household-continuity clue)
- the same sex-aware parent-name position recurs independently in sibling households: John Glasgow → Samuel Glasgow (+3)
- candidate's sibling and niece/nephew network repeats names in the subject's descendant line (three rarest at most): Adam +12 (15 public profiles; niece/nephew Adam Glasgow); Ellen +8 (16 public profiles; sibling Ellen Glasgow) (+20 total)
- 4 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+8): collateral network, household chronology, locality, naming
Deductions and cautions: a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving)
Show 3 lower-scoring possible fathers
Possible Father
John GlasgowGlasgow-1657
- plausible 45-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming
- candidate's birth is 71 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1837), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); candidate's household recorded Robert Glasgow in Clough, County Antrim, Ireland, United Kingdom within 3 years of the subject (−12; no contemporaneous child is indexed in the subject's locality); candidate already has another child named William Glasgow (Glasgow-1778) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict)
Show complete scoring
- plausible 45-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 71 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1837), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- mapped Cross townland, Ballymoney parish is 20.7 km from the subject's birth-period Dunaghy civil parish — County Antrim (+1; one or both placements are unproved)
- subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1799–1815) (+6; other parent Jane (McClure) Glasgow)
- known spouse Jane (McClure) Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (38) at the subject's birth (+3)
- a candidate spouse matches the second dated daughter Jane Glasgow, the expected mother position (+3; Jane in 71 profiles)
- uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Adam +12 (15 public profiles; subject branch: Adam Glasgow; candidate branch: Adam Dickie Glasgow); Jane +7 (71 public profiles; subject branch: Jane Glasgow; candidate branch: Jane (Glasgow) Adams, Jane Glasgow Armstrong; +4 repetition bonus) (+23 total including +4 multi-name bonus)
- 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming
Deductions and cautions: a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); candidate's household recorded Robert Glasgow in Clough, County Antrim, Ireland, United Kingdom within 3 years of the subject (−12; no contemporaneous child is indexed in the subject's locality); candidate already has another child named William Glasgow (Glasgow-1778) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict)
Possible Father
John GlasgowGlasgow-867
- 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming
- the nominal 10-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (16–30 years) (+4)
- candidate's birth is 36 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1837), a marginal two-generation interval (+1)
a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction)
Show complete scoring
- the nominal 10-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (16–30 years) (+4)
- candidate's birth is 36 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1837), a marginal two-generation interval (+1)
- mapped Rasharkin is 14.8 km from the subject's birth-period Dunaghy civil parish — County Antrim (+2; one or both placements are unproved)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
- a known child was born within 5 years of the subject (+1)
- candidate has another child, Alexander Glasgow, born 5 years from the subject in the same specific birth locality (+4; possible sibling-household clue)
- candidate's sibling and niece/nephew network repeats names in the subject's descendant line (three rarest at most): Adam +12 (15 public profiles; niece/nephew Adam Glasgow); Ellen +8 (16 public profiles; sibling Ellen Glasgow) (+20 total)
- 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming
Deductions and cautions: a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction)
Possible Father
John GlasgowGlasgow-2952
- plausible 31-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 57 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1837), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- subject's birth fits within the candidate's overall child-bearing span (1810–1816) (+3; children are not tied to one spouse)
a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)
Show complete scoring
- plausible 31-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 57 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1837), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- subject's birth fits within the candidate's overall child-bearing span (1810–1816) (+3; children are not tied to one spouse)
- uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Adam +12 (15 public profiles; subject branch: Adam Glasgow; candidate branch: Adam Glasgow) (+12 total)
Deductions and cautions: a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)
Possible mothers5 leads
Possible Mother
Catherine (Unknown) GlasgowUnknown-540856
- candidate is already linked as parent of 5 exact subject sibling profiles (+32): Robert Glasgow Sr, Samuel Glasgow, Margaret Glasgow, John Glasgow, Unknown (Glasgow) Young
- plausible 28-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 54 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1837), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)
Show complete scoring
- candidate is the spouse of the linked opposite-sex parent (+8; tree couple clue)
- plausible 28-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 54 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1837), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1801–1822) (+6; other parent Robert Glasco)
- candidate has another child, Robert Glasgow Sr, born 0 years from the subject in the same specific birth locality (+6; possible sibling-household clue)
- candidate is already linked as parent of 5 exact subject sibling profiles (+32): Robert Glasgow Sr, Samuel Glasgow, Margaret Glasgow, John Glasgow, Unknown (Glasgow) Young
- the candidate and the subject's linked father Robert Glasco are jointly recorded as parents of 5 exact sibling profiles (+14; strong couple-structure clue)
Deductions and cautions: same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)
Possible Mother
Mary ArthurArthur-2480
- plausible 37-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming
- candidate's birth is 63 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1837), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required
Show complete scoring
- plausible 37-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 63 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1837), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- mapped Inishrush is 22.1 km from the subject's birth-period Dunaghy civil parish — County Antrim (+1; one or both placements are unproved)
- subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1799–1815) (+6; other parent John Glasgow)
- uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Adam +14 (15 public profiles; subject branch: Adam Glasgow; candidate branch: Adam Glasgow, Adam Glasgow; +2 repetition bonus); Jane +5 (71 public profiles; subject branch: Jane Glasgow; candidate branch: Jane Florence Glasgow, Jane Glasgow; +2 repetition bonus) (+23 total including +4 multi-name bonus)
- 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming
Deductions and cautions: No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required
Show 3 lower-scoring possible mothers
Possible Mother
Jane (McClure) GlasgowMcClure-6341
- plausible 38-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 64 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1837), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- weak broad-area overlap: antrim (+1; not a locality match)
candidate's household recorded Robert Glasgow in Clough, County Antrim, Ireland, United Kingdom within 3 years of the subject (−12; no contemporaneous child is indexed in the subject's locality); candidate already has another child named William Glasgow (Glasgow-1778) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict)
Show complete scoring
- plausible 38-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 64 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1837), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- weak broad-area overlap: antrim (+1; not a locality match)
- subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1799–1815) (+6; other parent John Glasgow)
- candidate's name matches the second dated daughter Jane Glasgow, the expected mother position for a male subject (+5; catalogue rarity 1, Jane in 71 profiles)
- family naming controls: 0 supporting and 2 conflicting known positions (already reflected in naming weight)
- uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Adam +12 (15 public profiles; subject branch: Adam Glasgow; candidate branch: Adam Dickie Glasgow); Jane +7 (71 public profiles; subject branch: Jane Glasgow; candidate branch: Jane (Glasgow) Adams, Jane Glasgow Armstrong; +4 repetition bonus) (+23 total including +4 multi-name bonus)
Deductions and cautions: candidate's household recorded Robert Glasgow in Clough, County Antrim, Ireland, United Kingdom within 3 years of the subject (−12; no contemporaneous child is indexed in the subject's locality); candidate already has another child named William Glasgow (Glasgow-1778) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict)
Possible Mother
Anne GlasgowGlasgow-2874
- plausible 23-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1804–1827) (+6)
- candidate's birth is 49 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1837), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)
Show complete scoring
- plausible 23-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 49 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1837), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1804–1827) (+6)
- candidate's sibling and niece/nephew network repeats names in the subject's descendant line (three rarest at most): Adam +12 (15 public profiles; niece/nephew Adam Glasgow) (+12 total)
Deductions and cautions: locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)
Possible Mother
Eliza GlasgowGlasgow-3906
- plausible 21-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming
- candidate's birth is 47 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1837), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
descendant-name recurrence has no independent household, record, migration or specific-locality anchor (score capped at 39)
Show complete scoring
- plausible 21-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 47 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1837), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- mapped St Nossonus — Tamlaght O'Crilly Lower graveyard is 21.4 km from the subject's birth-period Dunaghy civil parish — County Antrim (+1; one or both placements are unproved)
- candidate's sibling and niece/nephew network repeats names in the subject's descendant line (three rarest at most): Adam +12 (15 public profiles; sibling Adam Glasgow) (+12 total)
- 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming
Deductions and cautions: descendant-name recurrence has no independent household, record, migration or specific-locality anchor (score capped at 39)
How parent leads are calculated
Automated leads use birth surnames—not married surnames—as parental eligibility, role-specific biological age limits, bounded and approximate-date uncertainty, household chronology, specific time-aware localities, mapped distance, tenancy succession, migration destinations and sex-aware Scottish naming positions across generations. People already attached as the subject's parents stay in the identity summary and are excluded from this alternative-candidate list, regardless of relationship confidence. The main calibration uses clues available on disconnected profiles; existing parent and sibling links are retained as comparison context rather than treated as transferable evidence. Common ordered names and grandparent-to-child echoes receive a small non-zero weight, so a John or James match can support several independent criteria without producing a lead alone. Rare names, repeated bearers and bundles across otherwise distinct branches receive substantially more weight according to catalogue frequency. An exact migration place is weighted by its rarity and repetition across both branches; a shared destination country is worth only one point. Extra weight is added only when at least three independent clue types converge: naming, locality, specific migration, household chronology or collateral networks. Sparse profiles retain a clearly labelled chronology-only fallback instead of disappearing. Countries, states, counties and research clusters do not count as a shared locality, and fallback, broad representative or kin-inferred coordinates are excluded from distance scoring. Shared descendant profiles are removed before branch-name comparison. A candidate already recorded as a parent-in-law is excluded. A confident or independently supported parent is treated as settled; uncertain and unassessed attachments remain open to alternative comparison. A different linked parent, an uncle/aunt or grandparent path, and a matching existing child profile prevent an alternative from being classified as a strong direct-parent lead until the underlying tree conflict or duplicate is resolved. Familiar forms such as Bessie are normalised. Surname remains an eligibility filter worth zero points.
Naming customs, shared farms and occupations are circumstantial. Children, spouses and collateral relatives may be missing, and tree-derived family networks are not independent evidence. Scores rank research leads; they do not prove parentage.
Same-name candidate
William GlasgowGlasgow-585
- same first and last name (+18)
- birth years within 7 (+10)
- overlapping locality (+8)
uncertain father attachments differ (no deduction)
Full comparison detail
- same first and last name (+18)
- birth years within 7 (+10)
- overlapping locality (+8)
- matching child names: James Glasgow, Jane Glasgow, Robert Glasgow
Conflicts: uncertain father attachments differ (no deduction)
Same-name candidate
William GlasgowGlasgow-1969
- same first and last name (+18)
- same birth year (+30)
uncertain father attachments differ (no deduction)
Full comparison detail
- same first and last name (+18)
- same birth year (+30)
Conflicts: uncertain father attachments differ (no deduction)
How duplicate leads are calculated
Dates are eligibility gates, not merely deductions: chronologically impossible people are excluded. Dates, places, spouses, parent certainty and children's profiles and names are then compared. A high score is a prompt to inspect records, not a merge recommendation.
Open only what you need
Research & records
Latest case researchThe current conclusion from the durable research case file.Updated
Current conclusion
William Glasgow-1387 is the William Glasgow, aged 40, recorded at Cloughgaldenagh house 1 in the surviving 1851 Dunaghy census. His wife was Ellin/Ellen, also 40, and the return explicitly records eight children. This is an existing profiled family, not a new unidentified branch.
The census does not name William's father. His current uncertain placement under Robert Glasgow-1367 may remain as a working attachment, but the record does not prove it and does not connect William to Robert, James or James junior in the 1825 Dunaghy tithe cluster.
Life and record timelineChronological mapped occurrences and their underlying sources.2 records
Profile-stated birthplace: Dunaghy, Killcondray, Antrim
Dunaghy civil parish — County Antrim
One-Tree export profile fields are search leads, not sources. Attached parent profile(s): Glasgow-1367.
Source and mapping detail
WikiTree profile export for Glasgow-1387
No sufficiently specific citation match found.
Precision: Civil-parish representative point
Head; weaver, age 40
The census explicitly places this person in William and Ellin Glasgow’s household.
Source and mapping detail
Candidate matched on record type, year; inspect before treating it as the underlying record.
Precision: Townland centrepoint
Evidence assessmentWhat is supported, uncertain or disputed in the current case model.18 claims
Documented or strongly supported
William Glasgow was recorded in Cloghgaldanagh townland (1851).
Head; weaver, age 40
Working hypotheses and conflicts
No claims in this category have been formally assessed.
Research questionsOpen problems, missing bridges and the next records to inspect.0 open
No formal open question is recorded for this person.
Sources and provenanceStructured citations and source-quality classifications.4 sources
Source or provenance: quality describes the record layer, not every conclusion drawn from it.
- derivative “1851 Irish Census Returns,” Cloughgaldenagh house 1, Dunaghy, County Antrim, detailed public transcription, PDF (); see also National Archives of Ireland household page () and FamilySearch QV9Y-WFJ7
- derivative “Griffith's Valuation, North Mid Antrim,” Dunaghy index, PDF
- tree_only WikiTree profile export for Glasgow-1387
- original 1851 Irish census detailed transcription: Cloughgaldenagh household 1, Dunaghy
Technical profile and raw captureDataset metadata, machine dossier and captured WikiTree biography.Advanced
WikiTree profile information
Glasgow-1387
William Glasgow
Updated 2026-08-19
Dataset: ONT_Glasco_2026-08-18T16_05.json · generated 2026-08-20
WikiTree biography, citations and relationship snapshot
Glasgow-1387 was captured 2026-08-19T15:04:19+00:00; WikiTree profile revision 2026-08-19.
Profile location claims
| Event | Date | Location | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| birth | — | Dunaghy, Killcondray, Antrim, Ireland | WikiTree profile field |
Immediate relationship snapshot
| Relationship | Person | WikiTree ID | Dates and places returned |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parents | Robert Glasgow | Glasgow-1367 | 1779-00-00 · County Tyrone, Ireland · 0000-00-00 |
| Children | Ellin Glasgow | Glasgow-1389 | 1837-00-00 · Dunaghy, County Antrim, Ireland · 0000-00-00 |
| Children | Jane Glasgow | Glasgow-435 | 1837-00-00 · New Monkland, Lanarkshire, Scotland, United Kingdom · 1841-00-00 |
| Children | William Glasgow | Glasgow-1390 | 1839-00-00 · 0000-00-00 |
| Children | Margaret Glasgow | Glasgow-1391 | 1841-00-00 · Dunaghy, County Antrim, Ireland · 0000-00-00 |
| Children | Betty Glasgow | Glasgow-1393 | 1842-00-00 · Dunaghy, County Antrim, Ireland · 0000-00-00 |
| Children | James Glasgow | Glasgow-1392 | 1843-00-00 · Dunaghy, County Antrim, Ireland · 0000-00-00 |
| Children | Robert Glasgow | Glasgow-1394 | 1845-00-00 · Dunaghy, County Antrim, Ireland · 0000-00-00 |
| Children | Adam Glasgow | Glasgow-1395 | 1847-00-00 · Dunaghy, County Antrim, Ireland · 0000-00-00 |
| Siblings | Margaret Winters | Glasgow-1053 | 1801-00-00 · County Antrim, Ireland · 0000-00-00 |
| Siblings | Hugh Glasgow | Glasgow-3956 | 1802-00-00 · 0000-00-00 |
| Siblings | Robert Glasgow Sr | Glasgow-1049 | 1811-00-00 · Donbought, Dunaghy, Antrim, Ireland · 1888-01-10 · Plainfield, Will, Illinois, United States |
| Siblings | John Glasgow | Glasgow-3140 | 1813-00-00 · Ireland · 0000-00-00 |
| Siblings | Unknown Young | Glasgow-3955 | 1818-00-00 · 0000-00-00 |
| Siblings | Samuel Glasgow | Glasgow-1052 | 1822-00-00 · 0000-00-00 |
| Spouses | Ellin Glasgow | Unknown-540868 | 1811-00-00 · 0000-00-00 · 1831-00-00 |
Record-bearing passages
- Biography William Glasgow was recorded as the 40-year-old head of house 1 at Cloughgaldenagh, Dunaghy, County Antrim, in the surviving 1851 census. He was a weaver, could read and write, and was living with his wife Ellin Glasgow, also aged 40 and a weaver. The return records County Antrim as their birthplace and 1831 as the year of their first marriage. “1851 Irish Census Returns,” Cloughgaldenagh house 1, Dunaghy, County Antrim, detailed public transcription, PDF (https://durrushistory.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/1851irishcensusreturnscommadelimitedtextfilejul24_071.pdf); see also National Archives of Ireland household page (http://www.census.nationalarchives.ie/pages/1851/Antrim/Killcondray/Dunaghy/Galdernaugh/1/) and FamilySearch QV9Y-WFJ7 (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:QV9Y-WFJ7).
- The household contained eight children, all recorded as born in County Antrim:
- {| class="wikitable" style="background-color:#e6ffe6;" ! Child !! Age !! Census description |- | Jane Glasgow || 16 || Daughter; weaver |- | Ellin Glasgow || 14 || Daughter; weaver |- | William Glasgow || 12 || Son; not at school |- | Margaret Glasgow || 10 || Daughter; not at school |- | James Glasgow || 8 || Son; not at school |- | Betty Glasgow || 8 || Daughter; not at school |- | Robert Glasgow || 6 || Son; not at school |- | Adam Glasgow || 4 || Son; not at school |} Research Notes The census does not name William's father. His attachment to Robert Glasgow is therefore retained as uncertain and should not be treated as proved by the 1851 household.
- The later Griffith's Valuation index for Dunaghy does not list William at Cloughgaldenagh. “Griffith's Valuation, North Mid Antrim,” Dunaghy index, PDF (https://www.billmacafee.com/1860griffiths/northmidantrimgriffiths.pdf). This negative finding does not establish his death, migration, or loss of tenancy. Sources
Profile source citations
- “1851 Irish Census Returns,” Cloughgaldenagh house 1, Dunaghy, County Antrim, detailed public transcription, PDF (https://durrushistory.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/1851irishcensusreturnscommadelimitedtextfilejul24_071.pdf); see also National Archives of Ireland household page (http://www.census.nationalarchives.ie/pages/1851/Antrim/Killcondray/Dunaghy/Galdernaugh/1/) and FamilySearch QV9Y-WFJ7 (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:QV9Y-WFJ7). source link 1 source link 2 source link 3
- {| class="wikitable" style="background-color:#e6ffe6;" ! Child !! Age !! Census description |- | Jane Glasgow || 16 || Daughter; weaver |- | Ellin Glasgow || 14 || Daughter; weaver |- | William Glasgow || 12 || Son; not at school |- | Margaret Glasgow || 10 || Daughter; not at school |- | James Glasgow || 8 || Son; not at school |- | Betty Glasgow || 8 || Daughter; not at school |- | Robert Glasgow || 6 || Son; not at school |- | Adam Glasgow || 4 || Son; not at school |} Research Notes The census does not name William's father. His attachment to Robert Glasgow is therefore retained as uncertain and should not be treated as proved by the 1851 household. The later Griffith's Valuation index for Dunaghy does not list William at Cloughgaldenagh. “Griffith's Valuation, North Mid Antrim,” Dunaghy index, PDF (https://www.billmacafee.com/1860griffiths/northmidantrimgriffiths.pdf). source link 1
Full captured biography text
Biography
William Glasgow was recorded as the 40-year-old head of house 1 at Cloughgaldenagh, Dunaghy, County Antrim, in the surviving 1851 census. He was a weaver, could read and write, and was living with his wife Ellin Glasgow, also aged 40 and a weaver. The return records County Antrim as their birthplace and 1831 as the year of their first marriage. “1851 Irish Census Returns,” Cloughgaldenagh house 1, Dunaghy, County Antrim, detailed public transcription, PDF (https://durrushistory.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/1851irishcensusreturnscommadelimitedtextfilejul24_071.pdf); see also National Archives of Ireland household page (http://www.census.nationalarchives.ie/pages/1851/Antrim/Killcondray/Dunaghy/Galdernaugh/1/) and FamilySearch QV9Y-WFJ7 (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:QV9Y-WFJ7).
The household contained eight children, all recorded as born in County Antrim:
{| class="wikitable" style="background-color:#e6ffe6;"
! Child !! Age !! Census description
|-
| Jane Glasgow || 16 || Daughter; weaver
|-
| Ellin Glasgow || 14 || Daughter; weaver
|-
| William Glasgow || 12 || Son; not at school
|-
| Margaret Glasgow || 10 || Daughter; not at school
|-
| James Glasgow || 8 || Son; not at school
|-
| Betty Glasgow || 8 || Daughter; not at school
|-
| Robert Glasgow || 6 || Son; not at school
|-
| Adam Glasgow || 4 || Son; not at school
|}
Research Notes
The census does not name William's father. His attachment to Robert Glasgow is therefore retained as uncertain and should not be treated as proved by the 1851 household.
The later Griffith's Valuation index for Dunaghy does not list William at Cloughgaldenagh. “Griffith's Valuation, North Mid Antrim,” Dunaghy index, PDF (https://www.billmacafee.com/1860griffiths/northmidantrimgriffiths.pdf). This negative finding does not establish his death, migration, or loss of tenancy.
SourcesRaw WikiTree biography markup
== Biography ==
William Glasgow was recorded as the 40-year-old head of house 1 at Cloughgaldenagh, Dunaghy, County Antrim, in the surviving 1851 census. He was a weaver, could read and write, and was living with his wife [[Unknown-540868|Ellin Glasgow]], also aged 40 and a weaver. The return records County Antrim as their birthplace and 1831 as the year of their first marriage.<ref name="Census1851">“1851 Irish Census Returns,” Cloughgaldenagh house 1, Dunaghy, County Antrim, detailed public transcription, [https://durrushistory.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/1851irishcensusreturnscommadelimitedtextfilejul24_071.pdf PDF]; see also [http://www.census.nationalarchives.ie/pages/1851/Antrim/Killcondray/Dunaghy/Galdernaugh/1/ National Archives of Ireland household page] and [https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:QV9Y-WFJ7 FamilySearch QV9Y-WFJ7].</ref>
The household contained eight children, all recorded as born in County Antrim:<ref name="Census1851"/>
{| class="wikitable" style="background-color:#e6ffe6;"
! Child !! Age !! Census description
|-
| [[Glasgow-435|Jane Glasgow]] || 16 || Daughter; weaver
|-
| [[Glasgow-1389|Ellin Glasgow]] || 14 || Daughter; weaver
|-
| [[Glasgow-1390|William Glasgow]] || 12 || Son; not at school
|-
| [[Glasgow-1391|Margaret Glasgow]] || 10 || Daughter; not at school
|-
| [[Glasgow-1392|James Glasgow]] || 8 || Son; not at school
|-
| [[Glasgow-1393|Betty Glasgow]] || 8 || Daughter; not at school
|-
| [[Glasgow-1394|Robert Glasgow]] || 6 || Son; not at school
|-
| [[Glasgow-1395|Adam Glasgow]] || 4 || Son; not at school
|}
== Research Notes ==
The census does not name William's father. His attachment to [[Glasgow-1367|Robert Glasgow]] is therefore retained as uncertain and should not be treated as proved by the 1851 household.
The later Griffith's Valuation index for Dunaghy does not list William at Cloughgaldenagh.<ref>“Griffith's Valuation, North Mid Antrim,” Dunaghy index, [https://www.billmacafee.com/1860griffiths/northmidantrimgriffiths.pdf PDF].</ref> This negative finding does not establish his death, migration, or loss of tenancy.
== Sources ==
<references />