Glasgow Surname Project

Individual research record

Margaret Glasgow

c. 1801 – ?

Glasgow-1053 · 2 mapped associations

Dunaghy, Kilconway, Antrim→Death place unknown
View on mapOpen WikiTreeCompareReport a correction

At a glance

Identity & family

Tree links organise the family; documentary status still varies.

2Mapped records
7Close relations
5Evidence items
12Candidate leads
Birth
c. 1801 · Dunaghy, Kilconway, Antrim
Death
Not recorded · Place not recorded
Parents
Robert GlasgowconfidentCatherine (Unknown) Glasgowconfident
Spouses
Samuel Winters
Children
Abraham WintersDavid WinterJane WintersNancy Winters
Gender
Female
WikiTree
Glasgow-1053
Research clusters
East Antrim/Kilwaughter cluster
Mapped descendants
0

Comparison context

These child positions and checks are the subject details used to rank possible parents below.

Naming sequence used by the parentage model

Paternal grandfather positionNot identifiable from dated child profiles
Maternal grandfather positionNot identifiable from dated child profiles
Maternal grandmother positionNot identifiable from dated child profiles
Paternal grandmother positionNot identifiable from dated child profiles

Known-position checks: 0 support · 0 conflict. Ordinals retain unnamed children and recognise reused names.

Relationship comparison

Potential parents or duplicates

Compare scored leads with the subject details above—not proof.

Higher-signal leadReview carefullyWeak lead

Possible fathers5 leads

Automated fit10/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1763–1816Generation38 years age gapRecorded placesLarne, County Antrim, Ireland · County Antrim, Ireland, United Kingdom · LarneIndependent clue breadth · 4Age · Mapped Proximity · Spouse · Spouse-Specific Child WindowExisting-tree context (not an independent clue)Sibling-Household ReplicationSame-spouse child windowElizabeth GlasgowCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 38-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • known spouse Elizabeth Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (36) at the subject's birth (+7)
  • the same sex-aware parent-name position recurs independently in sibling households: William Glasgow → William Glasgow (+3)

a different father is marked confident (−25; WikiTree: confident parent)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 38-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • mapped Larne is 26.5 km from the subject's birth-period Dunaghy civil parish — County Antrim (+1; one or both placements are unproved)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1783–1802) (+6; other parent Elizabeth Glasgow)
  • known spouse Elizabeth Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (36) at the subject's birth (+7)
  • the same sex-aware parent-name position recurs independently in sibling households: William Glasgow → William Glasgow (+3)

Deductions and cautions: a different father is marked confident (−25; WikiTree: confident parent)

Automated fit7/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1763–1835Generation38 years age gapRecorded placesIreland · Newberry, South Carolina, United States · County Antrim — exact locality unprovedIndependent clue breadth · 4Age · Broad Geography · Spouse · Spouse-Specific Child WindowSame-spouse child windowElizabeth (Kinard) GlasgowCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 38-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • known spouse Elizabeth (Kinard) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (38) at the subject's birth (+7)
  • weak broad-area overlap: antrim (+1; not a locality match)

a different father is marked confident (−25; WikiTree: confident parent)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 38-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • weak broad-area overlap: antrim (+1; not a locality match)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1785–1808) (+6; other parent Elizabeth (Kinard) Glasgow)
  • known spouse Elizabeth (Kinard) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (38) at the subject's birth (+7)

Deductions and cautions: a different father is marked confident (−25; WikiTree: confident parent)

Show 3 lower-scoring possible fathers
Automated fit3/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1780–1840Generation21 years age gapRecorded placesCounty Londonderry, Ireland · Bakerstown, West Deer Twp, Allegheny Co., Pennsylvania, United States · Portglenone — regional family-tradition referenceIndependent clue breadth · 7Age · Collateral Naming · Contemporaneous Household Conflict · Household · Indirect Multi-Factor Convergence · Mapped Proximity · SpouseCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 21-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • known spouse Peninnah (Thomas) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (23) at the subject's birth (+7)
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming

a different father is marked confident (−25; WikiTree: confident parent); candidate's household recorded Robert Alexander Glasgow in Bakerstown, Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, United States within 6 years of the subject (−12; no contemporaneous child is indexed in the subject's locality)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 21-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • mapped Portglenone — regional family-tradition reference is 19.1 km from the subject's birth-period Dunaghy civil parish — County Antrim (+1; one or both placements are unproved)
  • a known child was born within 6 years of the subject (+1)
  • known spouse Peninnah (Thomas) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (23) at the subject's birth (+7)
  • candidate's sibling and niece/nephew network repeats names in the subject's descendant line (three rarest at most): Nancy +5 (49 public profiles; niece/nephew Nancy (Glasgow) Donald, sibling Nancy Cunningham; +2 repetition bonus); Jane +3 (71 public profiles; niece/nephew Jane Glasgow) (+8 total)
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming

Deductions and cautions: a different father is marked confident (−25; WikiTree: confident parent); candidate's household recorded Robert Alexander Glasgow in Bakerstown, Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, United States within 6 years of the subject (−12; no contemporaneous child is indexed in the subject's locality)

Automated fit3/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1779–?Generation22 years age gapRecorded placesLocation not supplied — profile holding pointIndependent clue breadth · 2Age · SpouseExisting-tree context (not an independent clue)Sibling-Household ReplicationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 22-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • known spouse Janet (Thomson) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (18) at the subject's birth (+7)
  • the same sex-aware parent-name position recurs independently in sibling households: William Glasgow → William Glasgow (+3)

a different father is marked confident (−25; WikiTree: confident parent); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 22-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • known spouse Janet (Thomson) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (18) at the subject's birth (+7)
  • the same sex-aware parent-name position recurs independently in sibling households: William Glasgow → William Glasgow (+3)

Deductions and cautions: a different father is marked confident (−25; WikiTree: confident parent); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Automated fit3/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1767–1851Generation34 years age gapRecorded placesIreland · Guernsey County, Ohio, United States · Drumlamph townlandIndependent clue breadth · 4Age · Mapped Proximity · Spouse · Spouse-Specific Child WindowSame-spouse child windowMary ArthurCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 34-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • known spouse Mary Arthur had a plausible maternal age (27) at the subject's birth (+7)
  • mapped Inishrush is 22.1 km from the subject's birth-period Dunaghy civil parish — County Antrim (+1; one or both placements are unproved)

a different father is marked confident (−25; WikiTree: confident parent); candidate already has another child named Margaret (Glasgow) Walkinshaw (Glasgow-43) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 34-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • mapped Inishrush is 22.1 km from the subject's birth-period Dunaghy civil parish — County Antrim (+1; one or both placements are unproved)
  • subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1799–1815) (+6; other parent Mary Arthur)
  • known spouse Mary Arthur had a plausible maternal age (27) at the subject's birth (+7)

Deductions and cautions: a different father is marked confident (−25; WikiTree: confident parent); candidate already has another child named Margaret (Glasgow) Walkinshaw (Glasgow-43) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict)

Possible mothers5 leads

Automated fit0/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1795–?Generationnominally 6 years; approximate dates permit about 15–16 years age gapRecorded placesBathgate, Linlithgowshire, Scotland · Linlithgowshire / West Lothian — exact locality unprovedIndependent clue breadth · 1AgeCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • the nominal 6-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (15–16 years) (+4)

a different mother is marked confident (−25; WikiTree: confident parent); parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction); candidate is recorded only outside the subject's birth country (−25)

Show complete scoring
  • the nominal 6-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (15–16 years) (+4)

Deductions and cautions: a different mother is marked confident (−25; WikiTree: confident parent); parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction); candidate is recorded only outside the subject's birth country (−25)

Automated fit0/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1795–1847Generationnominally 6 years; approximate dates permit about 15–26 years age gapRecorded placesCookstown, County Tyrone, Ireland · Gortin, Derryloran, Cookstown, County Tyrone, Ireland · CookstownIndependent clue breadth · 1AgeCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • the nominal 6-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (15–26 years) (+4)

a different mother is marked confident (−25; WikiTree: confident parent); parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Show complete scoring
  • the nominal 6-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (15–26 years) (+4)

Deductions and cautions: a different mother is marked confident (−25; WikiTree: confident parent); parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Show 3 lower-scoring possible mothers
Automated fit0/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1795–1854Generationnominally 6 years; approximate dates permit about 15–26 years age gapRecorded placesLocation not supplied — profile holding pointIndependent clue breadth · 1AgeCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • the nominal 6-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (15–26 years) (+4)

a different mother is marked confident (−25; WikiTree: confident parent); parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Show complete scoring
  • the nominal 6-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (15–26 years) (+4)

Deductions and cautions: a different mother is marked confident (−25; WikiTree: confident parent); parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Automated fit0/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1795–?Generationnominally 6 years; approximate dates permit about 15–16 years age gapRecorded placesCounty Antrim — exact locality unprovedIndependent clue breadth · 2Age · Broad GeographyCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • the nominal 6-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (15–16 years) (+4)
  • weak broad-area overlap: antrim (+1; not a locality match)

a different mother is marked confident (−25; WikiTree: confident parent); parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction); candidate already has another child named Margaret Crawford Glasgow (Glasgow-3125) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict)

Show complete scoring
  • the nominal 6-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (15–16 years) (+4)
  • weak broad-area overlap: antrim (+1; not a locality match)

Deductions and cautions: a different mother is marked confident (−25; WikiTree: confident parent); parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction); candidate already has another child named Margaret Crawford Glasgow (Glasgow-3125) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict)

Automated fit0/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1795–1885Generationnominally 6 years; approximate dates permit about 15–26 years age gapRecorded placesSouth Carolina, United States · Warrior, Jefferson, Alabama, United StatesIndependent clue breadth · 1AgeCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • the nominal 6-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (15–26 years) (+4)

a different mother is marked confident (−25; WikiTree: confident parent); parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction); candidate is recorded only outside the subject's birth country (−25); subject lies more than 20 years from the candidate's known child-bearing period (−6; children may be missing)

Show complete scoring
  • the nominal 6-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (15–26 years) (+4)

Deductions and cautions: a different mother is marked confident (−25; WikiTree: confident parent); parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction); candidate is recorded only outside the subject's birth country (−25); subject lies more than 20 years from the candidate's known child-bearing period (−6; children may be missing)

How parent leads are calculated

Automated leads use birth surnames—not married surnames—as parental eligibility, role-specific biological age limits, bounded and approximate-date uncertainty, household chronology, specific time-aware localities, mapped distance, tenancy succession, migration destinations and sex-aware Scottish naming positions across generations. People already attached as the subject's parents stay in the identity summary and are excluded from this alternative-candidate list, regardless of relationship confidence. The main calibration uses clues available on disconnected profiles; existing parent and sibling links are retained as comparison context rather than treated as transferable evidence. Common ordered names and grandparent-to-child echoes receive a small non-zero weight, so a John or James match can support several independent criteria without producing a lead alone. Rare names, repeated bearers and bundles across otherwise distinct branches receive substantially more weight according to catalogue frequency. An exact migration place is weighted by its rarity and repetition across both branches; a shared destination country is worth only one point. Extra weight is added only when at least three independent clue types converge: naming, locality, specific migration, household chronology or collateral networks. Sparse profiles retain a clearly labelled chronology-only fallback instead of disappearing. Countries, states, counties and research clusters do not count as a shared locality, and fallback, broad representative or kin-inferred coordinates are excluded from distance scoring. Shared descendant profiles are removed before branch-name comparison. A candidate already recorded as a parent-in-law is excluded. A confident or independently supported parent is treated as settled; uncertain and unassessed attachments remain open to alternative comparison. A different linked parent, an uncle/aunt or grandparent path, and a matching existing child profile prevent an alternative from being classified as a strong direct-parent lead until the underlying tree conflict or duplicate is resolved. Familiar forms such as Bessie are normalised. Surname remains an eligibility filter worth zero points.

Naming customs, shared farms and occupations are circumstantial. Children, spouses and collateral relatives may be missing, and tree-derived family networks are not independent evidence. Scores rank research leads; they do not prove parentage.

Automated fit43/100
Similar Person
Dates1800–?PlacesPlaces not recordedParent comparisonNo shared parent is indexed
Why it may fit
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 1 (+25)

No indexed conflict

Full comparison detail
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 1 (+25)

Conflicts: No indexed conflict

Open side-by-side comparison
Automated fit43/100
Similar Person
Dates1803–1880PlacesAllegheny, Pennsylvania, United StatesParent comparisonNo shared parent is indexed
Why it may fit
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 2 (+25)

No indexed conflict

Full comparison detail
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 2 (+25)

Conflicts: No indexed conflict

Open side-by-side comparison
How duplicate leads are calculated

Dates are eligibility gates, not merely deductions: chronologically impossible people are excluded. Dates, places, spouses, parent certainty and children's profiles and names are then compared. A high score is a prompt to inspect records, not a merge recommendation.

Open only what you need

Research & records

Latest case researchThe current conclusion from the durable research case file.Updated

Current conclusion

Glasgow-1053 · updated 2026-08-11

The surviving 1851 census places Margaret Glasgow, aged 50 and explicitly unmarried, in the Glenleslie household of Robert Glasgow-1367 and Catherine. This directly supports her identity as their daughter.

The same WikiTree profile is currently attached as wife of Samuel Winters and has been used for a family with children beginning before 1851. That identity is incompatible with Margaret remaining unmarried in her parents' Irish household in 1851. Pending identification of a materially better profile for the Canadian woman, the marriage and all four mother-child links are retained but explicitly marked uncertain. This is a substantive contradiction, not merely a less favoured hypothesis.

Life and record timelineChronological mapped occurrences and their underlying sources.2 records
b. 1801

Profile-stated birthplace: Dunaghy, Kilconway, Antrim

Dunaghy civil parish — County Antrim

One-Tree export profile fields are search leads, not sources. Attached parent profile(s): Glasgow-1367, Unknown-540856.

One-Tree profile leadunknown
Source and mapping detail

WikiTree profile export for Glasgow-1053

No sufficiently specific citation match found.

Precision: Civil-parish representative point

Evidence assessmentWhat is supported, uncertain or disputed in the current case model.15 claims
2Derivative
2Original
1Tree Only

Documented or strongly supported

Margaret Glasgow was recorded in Glenleslie townland (1851).

proved1 linked evidence item

Daughter of Robert and Catherine; unmarried, age 50

Working hypotheses and conflicts

No claims in this category have been formally assessed.

Research questionsOpen problems, missing bridges and the next records to inspect.0 open

No formal open question is recorded for this person.

Sources and provenanceStructured citations and source-quality classifications.5 sources

Source or provenance: quality describes the record layer, not every conclusion drawn from it.

  1. original www.census.nationalarchives.ie (http://www.census.nationalarchives.ie/pages/1851/Antrim/Kilconway/Dunaghy/Glenleslie/23/).
  2. derivative Detailed 1851 census transcription (https://durrushistory.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/1851irishcensusreturnscommadelimitedtextfilejul24_071.pdf).
  3. derivative Bill MacAfee 1851 Kilconway transcription (https://www.billmacafee.com/census/1851censuskilconway.pdf).
  4. tree_only WikiTree profile export for Glasgow-1053
  5. original 1851 Irish census detailed transcription: Glenleslie household 23, Dunaghy
Technical profile and raw captureDataset metadata, machine dossier and captured WikiTree biography.Advanced

WikiTree profile information

Dataset: ONT_Glasco_2026-08-18T16_05.json · generated 2026-08-20

Machine-readable dossier

WikiTree biography, citations and relationship snapshot

Glasgow-1053 was captured 2026-08-19T10:56:10+00:00; WikiTree profile revision 2026-08-19.

Profile location claims

EventDateLocationStatus
birth—County Antrim, IrelandWikiTree profile field

Immediate relationship snapshot

RelationshipPersonWikiTree IDDates and places returned
ParentsRobert GlasgowGlasgow-13671779-00-00 · County Tyrone, Ireland · 0000-00-00
ParentsCatherine GlasgowUnknown-5408561783-00-00 · 0000-00-00
ChildrenDavid WinterWinter-96921829-00-00 · 1907-00-00
ChildrenAbraham WintersWinters-49341833-09-29 · Ireland · 1931-10-25 · Ernestown, Lennox and Addington, Ontario, Canada
ChildrenNancy WintersWinters-49351834-10-28 · Ireland · 1914-02-26
ChildrenJane WintersWinters-49361839-00-00 · Ireland · 1926-07-28
SiblingsHugh GlasgowGlasgow-39561802-00-00 · 0000-00-00
SiblingsRobert Glasgow SrGlasgow-10491811-00-00 · Donbought, Dunaghy, Antrim, Ireland · 1888-01-10 · Plainfield, Will, Illinois, United States
SiblingsWilliam GlasgowGlasgow-13871811-00-00 · Dunaghy, Killcondray, Antrim · 0000-00-00
SiblingsJohn GlasgowGlasgow-31401813-00-00 · Ireland · 0000-00-00
SiblingsUnknown YoungGlasgow-39551818-00-00 · 0000-00-00
SiblingsSamuel GlasgowGlasgow-10521822-00-00 · 0000-00-00
SpousesSamuel WintersWinters-49331802-00-00 · County Armagh, Ireland · 1882-07-02 · Richmond, Lennox and Addington, Ontario, Canada · 0000-00-00

Profile categories

Estimated_Birth_Date Glasgow_Name_Study

Record-bearing passages

Profile source citations

  1. http://www.census.nationalarchives.ie/pages/1851/Antrim/Kilconway/Dunaghy/Glenleslie/23/ source link 1
  2. Detailed 1851 census transcription (https://durrushistory.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/1851irishcensusreturnscommadelimitedtextfilejul24_071.pdf). source link 1
  3. Bill MacAfee 1851 Kilconway transcription (https://www.billmacafee.com/census/1851censuskilconway.pdf). source link 1
  4. www.census.nationalarchives.ie (http://www.census.nationalarchives.ie/pages/1851/Antrim/Kilconway/Dunaghy/Glenleslie/23/). source link 1
Full captured biography text
Biography
Margaret was born in 1801. She is the daughter of Robert Glasgow. http://www.census.nationalarchives.ie/pages/1851/Antrim/Kilconway/Dunaghy/Glenleslie/23/ 
Research Notes
Current research
The surviving 1851 census places Margaret Glasgow, aged 50 and explicitly unmarried, in the Glenleslie household of Robert Glasgow-1367 and Catherine. This directly supports her identity as their daughter.

The same WikiTree profile is currently attached as wife of Samuel Winters and has been used for a family with children beginning before 1851. That identity is incompatible with Margaret remaining unmarried in her parents' Irish household in 1851. The Winters spouse/descendant identity should therefore be separated from Glasgow-1053 unless Canadian primary records disprove the census identification. This is a substantive contradiction, not merely a less favoured hypothesis.

This assessment draws on the cited records and public source material. Detailed 1851 census transcription (https://durrushistory.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/1851irishcensusreturnscommadelimitedtextfilejul24_071.pdf). Bill MacAfee 1851 Kilconway transcription (https://www.billmacafee.com/census/1851censuskilconway.pdf). www.census.nationalarchives.ie (http://www.census.nationalarchives.ie/pages/1851/Antrim/Kilconway/Dunaghy/Glenleslie/23/). 
Sources
Raw WikiTree biography markup
{{Estimated Date}}
{{One Name Study|name=Glasgow}}

== Biography ==
Margaret was born in 1801. She is the daughter of [[Glasgow-1049|Robert Glasgow]]. <ref>http://www.census.nationalarchives.ie/pages/1851/Antrim/Kilconway/Dunaghy/Glenleslie/23/</ref>

== Research Notes ==
=== Current research ===

The surviving 1851 census places Margaret Glasgow, aged 50 and explicitly '''unmarried''', in the Glenleslie household of Robert <code>Glasgow-1367</code> and Catherine. This directly supports her identity as their daughter.

The same WikiTree profile is currently attached as wife of Samuel Winters and has been used for a family with children beginning before 1851. That identity is incompatible with Margaret remaining unmarried in her parents' Irish household in 1851. The Winters spouse/descendant identity should therefore be separated from <code>Glasgow-1053</code> unless Canadian primary records disprove the census identification. This is a substantive contradiction, not merely a less favoured hypothesis.

This assessment draws on the cited records and public source material.<ref name="ProjectSource1">[https://durrushistory.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/1851irishcensusreturnscommadelimitedtextfilejul24_071.pdf Detailed 1851 census transcription].</ref><ref name="ProjectSource2">[https://www.billmacafee.com/census/1851censuskilconway.pdf Bill MacAfee 1851 Kilconway transcription].</ref><ref name="ProjectSource3">[http://www.census.nationalarchives.ie/pages/1851/Antrim/Kilconway/Dunaghy/Glenleslie/23/ www.census.nationalarchives.ie].</ref>

== Sources ==
<references />