Glasgow Surname Project

Individual research record

John Glasgow

1751 – c. 1852

Glasgow-1022 · 2 mapped associations

County Antrim, IrelandCounty Antrim, Ireland, United Kingdom

At a glance

Identity & family

Tree links organise the family; documentary status still varies.

2Mapped records
9Close relations
32Evidence items
12Candidate leads
Birth
1751 · County Antrim, Ireland
Death
c. 1852 · County Antrim, Ireland, United Kingdom
Parents
William Glasgowuncertain
Spouses
Rose Alexander
Children
Andrew GlasgowEllen GlasgowGeorge GlasgowJohn GlasgowNancy GlasgowSamuel GlasgowRobert Glasco
Gender
Male
WikiTree
Glasgow-1022
Research clusters
Descendants of John Glasgow (c.1751) East Antrim/Kilwaughter cluster
Mapped descendants
21

Comparison context

These child positions and checks are the subject details used to rank possible parents below.

Naming sequence used by the parentage model

Paternal grandfather positionAndrew Glasgow (1818)
Maternal grandfather positionNot identifiable from dated child profiles
Maternal grandmother positionNancy Glasgow (1815)
Paternal grandmother positionEllen Glasgow (1825)

Known-position checks: 0 support · 1 conflict. Ordinals retain unnamed children and recognise reused names.

Relationship comparison

Potential parents or duplicates

Compare scored leads with the subject details above—not proof.

Higher-signal leadReview carefullyWeak lead

Possible fathers5 leads

Automated fit39/100
Weak Lead
Dates1721–1831Generation30 years age gapRecorded placesMoneymore, County Londonderry, Ireland · Moneymore, County Londonderry, Ireland, United Kingdom · MoneymoreIndependent clue breadth · 9Age · Broad Migration · Household · Indirect Multi-Factor Convergence · Rare Branch-Name Recurrence · Rare Name Bundle · Repeated Marriage Surnames · Spouse · Two-GenerationExisting-tree context (not an independent clue)Sibling-Household ReplicationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 30-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): collateral network, household chronology, naming
  • candidate's birth is 58 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1779), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)

a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10); descendant-name recurrence has no independent household, record, migration or specific-locality anchor (score capped at 39)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 30-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 58 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1779), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • a known child was born within 1 years of the subject (+3)
  • known spouse Mary (Harkness) Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (26) at the subject's birth (+3)
  • the same sex-aware parent-name position recurs independently in sibling households: James Glasgow → James Glasgow (+3)
  • uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Jane +7 (71 public profiles; subject branch: Jane Glasgow, Jane Glasgow; candidate branch: Jane (Glasgow) Patton; +4 repetition bonus); Joseph +7 (39 public profiles; subject branch: Joseph Glasgow; candidate branch: Joseph Glasgow, Joseph Montgomery Glasgow; +4 repetition bonus); Nancy +7 (49 public profiles; subject branch: Nancy Glasgow; candidate branch: Nancy Jane (Campbell) Glasgow, Nancy Crockett (Glasgow) Black; +4 repetition bonus) (+29 total including +8 multi-name bonus)
  • uncommon spouse surnames recur across the subject and candidate branches: Mcneil +6; Anderson +4 (+10 total)
  • descendant branches share only a broad migration destination country (+1; weak alone): united states
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): collateral network, household chronology, naming

Deductions and cautions: a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10); descendant-name recurrence has no independent household, record, migration or specific-locality anchor (score capped at 39)

Automated fit39/100
Weak Lead
Dates1700–1759Generation51 years age gapRecorded placesCounty Tyrone, Ireland · Drumearn, Tyrone, Ireland · Cookstown estate areaIndependent clue breadth · 7Age · Broad Migration · Indirect Multi-Factor Convergence · Rare Branch-Name Recurrence · Rare Name Bundle · Repeated Marriage Surnames · Two-GenerationExisting-tree context (not an independent clue)Sibling-Household ReplicationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • possible 51-year parent-child age gap (+10)
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): collateral network, household chronology, naming
  • candidate's birth is 79 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1779), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)

a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10); descendant-name recurrence has no independent household, record, migration or specific-locality anchor (score capped at 39)

Show complete scoring
  • possible 51-year parent-child age gap (+10)
  • candidate's birth is 79 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1779), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • the same sex-aware parent-name position recurs independently in sibling households: James Glasgow → James Glasgow (+3)
  • uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Jane +7 (71 public profiles; subject branch: Jane Glasgow, Jane Glasgow; candidate branch: Jane (Glasgow) Patton; +4 repetition bonus); Joseph +7 (39 public profiles; subject branch: Joseph Glasgow; candidate branch: Joseph Glasgow, Joseph Glasgow; +4 repetition bonus); Ann +3 (41 public profiles; subject branch: Ann Glasgow; candidate branch: Ann Nancy (Glasgow) Campbell) (+25 total including +8 multi-name bonus)
  • uncommon spouse surnames recur across the subject and candidate branches: Mcneil +6; Anderson +4 (+10 total)
  • descendant branches share only a broad migration destination country (+1; weak alone): united states
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): collateral network, household chronology, naming

Deductions and cautions: a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10); descendant-name recurrence has no independent household, record, migration or specific-locality anchor (score capped at 39)

Show 3 lower-scoring possible fathers
Automated fit34/100
Weak Lead
Dates1706–?Generation45 years age gapRecorded placesCounty Tyrone, Ireland · County Tyrone — exact locality unprovedIndependent clue breadth · 6Age · Broad Migration · Rare Branch-Name Recurrence · Rare Name Bundle · Spouse · Two-GenerationExisting-tree context (not an independent clue)Rare Sibling-Name PatternCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 45-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 73 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1779), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • known spouse Margaret McCullough had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (36) at the subject's birth (+3)

a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10); candidate already has another child named John Glasgow (Glasgow-549) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 45-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 73 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1779), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • known spouse Margaret McCullough had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (36) at the subject's birth (+3)
  • candidate's other children share uncommon given names with the subject's recorded siblings: Hugh +3 (36 public profiles) (+3 total)
  • uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Jane +7 (71 public profiles; subject branch: Jane Glasgow, Jane Glasgow; candidate branch: Jane Glasgow; +4 repetition bonus); Nancy +7 (49 public profiles; subject branch: Nancy Glasgow; candidate branch: Nancy (Glasgow) Donald, Nancy Glasgow; +4 repetition bonus); Alexander +3 (59 public profiles; subject branch: Alexander Glasgow; candidate branch: Alexander Glasgow) (+25 total including +8 multi-name bonus)
  • descendant branches share only a broad migration destination country (+1; weak alone): united states

Deductions and cautions: a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10); candidate already has another child named John Glasgow (Glasgow-549) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict)

Possible Father

John GlasgowGlasgow-81

Automated fit27/100
Weak Lead
Dates1709–?Generation42 years age gapRecorded placesKirknewton and East Calder, Edinburghshire, Scotland · Kirknewton — West LothianIndependent clue breadth · 7Age · Rare Branch-Name Recurrence · Rare Name Bundle · Same-Sex Generational Naming · Spouse · Spouse-Specific Child Window · Two-GenerationSame-spouse child windowMagdalene (Guthrie) GlasgowCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 42-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 70 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1779), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • known spouse Magdalene (Guthrie) Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (33) at the subject's birth (+3)

a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); candidate is recorded only outside the subject's birth country (−25)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 42-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 70 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1779), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1745–1756) (+6; other parent Magdalene (Guthrie) Glasgow)
  • known spouse Magdalene (Guthrie) Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (33) at the subject's birth (+3)
  • candidate and subject share the given name John (+4; weak direct parent-child name recurrence, 278 public profiles)
  • uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Betty +14 (5 public profiles; subject branch: Betty Glasgow; candidate branch: Betty (Glasgow) Nichol); Andrew +5 (31 public profiles; subject branch: Andrew Glasgow, Andrew Glasgow; candidate branch: Andrew Glasgow; +2 repetition bonus) (+23 total including +4 multi-name bonus)

Deductions and cautions: a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); candidate is recorded only outside the subject's birth country (−25)

Automated fit24/100
Weak Lead
Dates1720–?Generation31 years age gapRecorded placesKirknewton — West LothianIndependent clue breadth · 7Age · Broad Migration · Rare Branch-Name Recurrence · Rare Name Bundle · Sex-Aware Ordered Naming · Tradition Validation · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 31-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 59 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1779), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • candidate's name matches the first dated son Andrew Glasgow, the expected father position for a male subject (+5; catalogue rarity 1, Andrew in 31 profiles)

a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); candidate is recorded only outside the subject's birth country (−25)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 31-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 59 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1779), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • candidate's name matches the first dated son Andrew Glasgow, the expected father position for a male subject (+5; catalogue rarity 1, Andrew in 31 profiles)
  • family naming controls: 0 supporting and 1 conflicting known positions (already reflected in naming weight)
  • uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Alexander +7 (59 public profiles; subject branch: Alexander Glasgow; candidate branch: Alexander Glasgow, Alexander Glasgow; +4 repetition bonus); Jane +7 (71 public profiles; subject branch: Jane Glasgow, Jane Glasgow; candidate branch: Jane (Glasgow) Massarini; +4 repetition bonus); George +5 (61 public profiles; subject branch: George Glasgow, George Glasgow; candidate branch: George Glasgow; +2 repetition bonus) (+27 total including +8 multi-name bonus)
  • descendant branches share only a broad migration destination country (+1; weak alone): united states

Deductions and cautions: a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); candidate is recorded only outside the subject's birth country (−25)

Possible mothers5 leads

Automated fit39/100
Weak Lead
Dates1736–?Generation15 years age gapRecorded placesCounty Antrim, Ireland · New Town — LarneIndependent clue breadth · 6Age · Collateral Naming · Great-Grandparent Name Echo · Indirect Multi-Factor Convergence · Mapped Proximity · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • possible 15-year parent-child age gap (+10)
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming
  • candidate's birth is 43 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1779), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)

No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required

Show complete scoring
  • possible 15-year parent-child age gap (+10)
  • candidate's birth is 43 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1779), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • mapped New Town — Larne is 26.6 km from the subject's birth-period Glenleslie townland (+1; one or both placements are unproved)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • candidate's sibling and niece/nephew network repeats names in the subject's descendant line (three rarest at most): Rose +12 (9 public profiles; sibling Rose Glasgow); Ann +3 (41 public profiles; niece/nephew Ann Glasgow); Hugh +3 (36 public profiles; sibling Hugh Glasgow) (+18 total)
  • candidate's parents' names recur among the subject's grandchildren: Ann +1 (+1 total; weak multigeneration clue)
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming

Deductions and cautions: No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required

Automated fit39/100
Weak Lead
Dates1733–?Generation18 years age gapRecorded placesCounty Antrim, Ireland · KilwaughterIndependent clue breadth · 5Age · Collateral Naming · Indirect Multi-Factor Convergence · Mapped Proximity · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 18-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming
  • candidate's birth is 46 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1779), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)

descendant-name recurrence has no independent household, record, migration or specific-locality anchor (score capped at 39)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 18-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 46 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1779), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • mapped Kilwaughter is 29.2 km from the subject's birth-period Glenleslie townland (+1; one or both placements are unproved)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • candidate's sibling and niece/nephew network repeats names in the subject's descendant line (three rarest at most): Ellen +8 (16 public profiles; niece/nephew Ellen Glasgow); Nancy +5 (49 public profiles; niece/nephew Nancy Glasgow; +2 repetition bonus); Andrew +3 (31 public profiles; niece/nephew Andrew Glasgow) (+16 total)
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming

Deductions and cautions: descendant-name recurrence has no independent household, record, migration or specific-locality anchor (score capped at 39)

Show 3 lower-scoring possible mothers
Automated fit39/100
Weak Lead
Dates1725–?Generation26 years age gapRecorded placesCounty Londonderry, Ireland · County Londonderry — exact locality unprovedIndependent clue breadth · 8Age · Broad Migration · Household · Indirect Multi-Factor Convergence · Rare Branch-Name Recurrence · Rare Name Bundle · Repeated Marriage Surnames · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 26-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): collateral network, household chronology, naming
  • candidate's birth is 54 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1779), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)

same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10); descendant-name recurrence has no independent household, record, migration or specific-locality anchor (score capped at 39)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 26-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 54 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1779), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • a known child was born within 1 years of the subject (+3)
  • uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Jane +7 (71 public profiles; subject branch: Jane Glasgow, Jane Glasgow; candidate branch: Jane (Glasgow) Patton; +4 repetition bonus); Joseph +7 (39 public profiles; subject branch: Joseph Glasgow; candidate branch: Joseph Glasgow, Joseph Montgomery Glasgow; +4 repetition bonus); Nancy +7 (49 public profiles; subject branch: Nancy Glasgow; candidate branch: Nancy Jane (Campbell) Glasgow, Nancy Crockett (Glasgow) Black; +4 repetition bonus) (+29 total including +8 multi-name bonus)
  • uncommon spouse surnames recur across the subject and candidate branches: Mcneil +6; Anderson +4 (+10 total)
  • descendant branches share only a broad migration destination country (+1; weak alone): united states
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): collateral network, household chronology, naming

Deductions and cautions: same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10); descendant-name recurrence has no independent household, record, migration or specific-locality anchor (score capped at 39)

Automated fit39/100
Weak Lead
Dates1715–1765Generation36 years age gapRecorded placesPortglenone — regional family-tradition referenceIndependent clue breadth · 8Age · Broad Migration · Candidate-Family Tradition · Indirect Multi-Factor Convergence · Mapped Proximity · Rare Branch-Name Recurrence · Rare Name Bundle · Two-GenerationExisting-tree context (not an independent clue)Rare Sibling-Name PatternCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 36-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming
  • candidate's birth is 64 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1779), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)

candidate already has another child named John Glasgow (Glasgow-549) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict); descendant-name recurrence has no independent household, record, migration or specific-locality anchor (score capped at 39)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 36-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 64 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1779), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • mapped Portglenone — regional family-tradition reference is 17.4 km from the subject's birth-period Glenleslie townland (+1; one or both placements are unproved)
  • candidate's other children share uncommon given names with the subject's recorded siblings: Hugh +3 (36 public profiles) (+3 total)
  • uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Jane +7 (71 public profiles; subject branch: Jane Glasgow, Jane Glasgow; candidate branch: Jane Glasgow; +4 repetition bonus); Nancy +7 (49 public profiles; subject branch: Nancy Glasgow; candidate branch: Nancy (Glasgow) Donald, Nancy Glasgow; +4 repetition bonus); Alexander +3 (59 public profiles; subject branch: Alexander Glasgow; candidate branch: Alexander Glasgow) (+25 total including +8 multi-name bonus)
  • descendant branches share only a broad migration destination country (+1; weak alone): united states
  • the candidate's own child family has 2 known-position naming matches (+3; branch-level validation)
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming

Deductions and cautions: candidate already has another child named John Glasgow (Glasgow-549) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict); descendant-name recurrence has no independent household, record, migration or specific-locality anchor (score capped at 39)

Automated fit39/100
Weak Lead
Dates1711–1786Generation40 years age gapRecorded placesCounty Antrim — exact locality unprovedIndependent clue breadth · 6Age · Broad Geography · Household · Rare Branch-Name Recurrence · Rare Name Bundle · Two-GenerationExisting-tree context (not an independent clue)Rare Sibling-Name PatternCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 40-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 68 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1779), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • a known child was born within 3 years of the subject (+3)

descendant-name recurrence has no independent household, record, migration or specific-locality anchor (score capped at 39)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 40-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 68 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1779), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • weak broad-area overlap: antrim (+1; not a locality match)
  • a known child was born within 3 years of the subject (+3)
  • candidate's other children share uncommon given names with the subject's recorded siblings: Hugh +3 (36 public profiles) (+3 total)
  • uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Rose +12 (9 public profiles; subject branch: Rose Ann Glasgow; candidate branch: Rose Glasgow); Ann +3 (41 public profiles; subject branch: Ann Glasgow; candidate branch: Ann Glasgow) (+19 total including +4 multi-name bonus)

Deductions and cautions: descendant-name recurrence has no independent household, record, migration or specific-locality anchor (score capped at 39)

How parent leads are calculated

Automated leads use birth surnames—not married surnames—as parental eligibility, role-specific biological age limits, bounded and approximate-date uncertainty, household chronology, specific time-aware localities, mapped distance, tenancy succession, migration destinations and sex-aware Scottish naming positions across generations. People already attached as the subject's parents stay in the identity summary and are excluded from this alternative-candidate list, regardless of relationship confidence. The main calibration uses clues available on disconnected profiles; existing parent and sibling links are retained as comparison context rather than treated as transferable evidence. Common ordered names and grandparent-to-child echoes receive a small non-zero weight, so a John or James match can support several independent criteria without producing a lead alone. Rare names, repeated bearers and bundles across otherwise distinct branches receive substantially more weight according to catalogue frequency. An exact migration place is weighted by its rarity and repetition across both branches; a shared destination country is worth only one point. Extra weight is added only when at least three independent clue types converge: naming, locality, specific migration, household chronology or collateral networks. Sparse profiles retain a clearly labelled chronology-only fallback instead of disappearing. Countries, states, counties and research clusters do not count as a shared locality, and fallback, broad representative or kin-inferred coordinates are excluded from distance scoring. Shared descendant profiles are removed before branch-name comparison. A candidate already recorded as a parent-in-law is excluded. A confident or independently supported parent is treated as settled; uncertain and unassessed attachments remain open to alternative comparison. A different linked parent, an uncle/aunt or grandparent path, and a matching existing child profile prevent an alternative from being classified as a strong direct-parent lead until the underlying tree conflict or duplicate is resolved. Familiar forms such as Bessie are normalised. Surname remains an eligibility filter worth zero points.

Naming customs, shared farms and occupations are circumstantial. Children, spouses and collateral relatives may be missing, and tree-derived family networks are not independent evidence. Scores rank research leads; they do not prove parentage.

Same-name candidate

John GlasgowGlasgow-3298

Automated fit56/100
Similar Person
Dates1755–?PlacesGlasgow, Lanarkshire, ScotlandParent comparisonNo shared parent is indexed
Why it may fit
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 4 (+18)
  • matching child names: George Glasgow, John Glasgow

uncertain father attachments differ (no deduction)

Full comparison detail
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 4 (+18)
  • matching child names: George Glasgow, John Glasgow

Conflicts: uncertain father attachments differ (no deduction)

Same-name candidate

John GlasgowGlasgow-3480

Automated fit48/100
Similar Person
Dates1751–?PlacesKirknewton And East Calder, Midlothian, ScotlandParent comparisonNo shared parent is indexed
Why it may fit
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • same birth year (+30)

uncertain father attachments differ (no deduction)

Full comparison detail
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • same birth year (+30)

Conflicts: uncertain father attachments differ (no deduction)

How duplicate leads are calculated

Dates are eligibility gates, not merely deductions: chronologically impossible people are excluded. Dates, places, spouses, parent certainty and children's profiles and names are then compared. A high score is a prompt to inspect records, not a merge recommendation.

Open only what you need

Research & records

Latest case researchThe current conclusion from the durable research case file.Updated

Current conclusion

Glasgow-1022 · updated 2026-08-13

Collateral update, 13 August 2026

Two new original civil records extend the family without solving John's own parentage.

  • The 1851 mortality schedule directly identifies Andrew Glasgow-1050 as

John's son. Samuel John Glasgow-1419's 1866 marriage names his father as Andrew Glasgow, labourer. The age and County Antrim context make Andrew Glasgow-1050 the strongest match, but the marriage omits the father's residence, so the father-son identity remains probable rather than certain.

  • John Glasgow-2407, later farmer of Cross, named his father as **John

Glasgow, farmer** in his original 1865 marriage. He is not the 1851 nephew: the nephew was married from 1839, whereas the 1865 groom was explicitly a bachelor. John-1022 is a possible father, but John Glasgow-1657 of Cross is a geographically stronger competing candidate. Leave John-2407 parentless.

These results distinguish the married nephew, the Lisnagaver John/Samuel brother pair, and the Cross farmer as separate research lines.

The newly reviewed Kilwaughter material supplies no evidence that this John was a son of Robert Glasgow-1143. The 17 May 1747 discipline entry names no woman or child. The 1 April 1772 petition places John under Larne, while Robert Glasgow, James Glasgow and Hugh Shannon occur consecutively under Kilwaughter. Remove any claim that the discipline case establishes John's father; the structured link to Robert-1143 remains unsupported.

The records support two related-looking but not yet connected branches.

original 1846 marriage names their likely father as John Glasgow, farmer. A family gravestone places the younger John's birth about 1816/17, although his 1851 age implies about 1801. John Glasgow-1022 is a possible identity for the father, but the later date would make him about sixty-five at the birth and removes the basis for calling him the clear leading candidate. Keep both relationships uncertain and leave their mother blank.

  • Alexander Glasgow-951 should not be attached as John's son from the Mary

evidence. Mary Glasgow was 28 in 1871 and therefore cannot be John's granddaughter Maryan, who was already 17 in 1851.

  • Robert Glasgow-1367 is not the Robert at Gortereghy. Household adjacency at

Glenleslie is insufficient to make him John's son; leave Robert parentless.

Alexander Glasgow-951 is their probable brother. The Gortereghy Robert was most likely Alexander's proved son Robert Glasgow-938, making the two Gortereghy men probable uncle and nephew.

  • The exact relationship between the John and older-Alexander branches remains

unknown. They may have been brothers, making the Lisnagaver heads cousins, but father-son and more distant collateral relationships remain possible.

The fuller 1851 Glenleslie return also exposes three unresolved branches which should be pursued rather than forced into existing children. Ann Glasgow, 18, and Mary Ann/Maryan Glasgow, 17, were explicitly John's granddaughters. Jane Grimes, 5, and James Grimes, nine months, were also his grandchildren, implying an unidentified child in a Grimes household. A married John Glasgow aged about 40 was explicitly John's nephew, providing direct evidence that John-1022 had at least one sibling or sibling-equivalent relationship still to identify.

John Glasgow-2056 is only a candidate for that nephew, not an identification. His original 1850 marriage names his father as Henry Glasgow, farmer. He can be the census nephew only if Henry is independently shown to be John-1022's brother or equivalent relative.

The adjacent George household and the recurring Alexander relatives make this a Glasgow-Alexander local network. The earlier Ballyboggy records extend that network geographically and chronologically, but do not yet prove John-1022's parentage: John Glasgow co-leased Ballyboggy with James Wier in 1740, and James Glasgow plus James Glasgow junior occur there among Alexander and Wier occupiers in 1825. Ballyboggy directly adjoins Glenleslie.

The current attachment to [[Glasgow-1505|William Glasgow of Larne]] remains a valid uncertain working hypothesis, but the 1740 [[Glasgow-3959|John Glasgow of Ballyboggy]] is the geographically stronger father-or-grandfather candidate. The two models should remain open: neither record names John-1022 as a child.

See family reconstruction.

Life and record timelineChronological mapped occurrences and their underlying sources.2 records
c.1751–c.1852

Glenleslie / Lisnagaver locality

Glenleslie townland

Possible descendant of the wider East Antrim cohort; no record makes Robert Glasgow his father.

Working offshootunknown
Source and mapping detail

WikiTree profile export for Glasgow-1022

No sufficiently specific citation match found.

Precision: Townland centrepoint

1803

Agricultural census occupier

Carnbuck townland Loughguile parish

The compiler standardised John Glesco as Glasgow. John-1022 is age-compatible but the record supplies no age, relative or identifier linking Carnbuck to Glenleslie.

Candidate identityderivative
Source and mapping detail

1803 North Antrim agricultural census

Candidate matched on record type, year, place; inspect before treating it as the underlying record.

Precision: Townland centroid

Case-file source findingsSource extracts and analysis regenerated from findings.md.1 section(s)

Source findings

Glasgow-1022 · updated 2026-08-13

SourceFindingAssessment
Detailed 1851 census transcription, p. 103John, 99, and Rose, 80, were Antrim-born and recorded at Glenleslie house 21 as married in 1791. John was a farmer.Strong derivative evidence from a field-by-field transcription. The WikiTree structured marriage date 1839 is an identity error: 1839 belongs to the nephew John in the same household. Original-image confirmation remains desirable.
Samuel John Glasgow's original 1866 marriageSamuel named his father as Andrew Glasgow, labourer.Strong probable continuation of John's proved son Andrew; the certificate does not state the father's residence.
John Glasgow and Rachel Grey's original 1865 marriage and John's 1874 deathJohn was a bachelor farmer of Cross, son of John Glasgow, farmer; he died at Cross aged 65.Proves a separate John-son-of-John line and excludes him as the 1851 married nephew. It does not identify John-1022 as the father.
Bill MacAfee, 1851 Kilconway census transcription, Glenleslie house 21Explicitly calls Ellen, Andrew and Nancy children; Ann and Mary Ann Glasgow plus Jane and James Grimes grandchildren; John Glasgow about 40 a nephew; and deceased William Alexander a brother-in-law.Direct relationship terms in a detailed derivative census transcription. The grandchildren's parents and nephew's father remain unidentified.
Same census, Glenleslie houses 21-23John headed house 21; Patrick Hamill headed 22; Robert Glasgow-1367, 72, an Antrim-born farmer, headed 23.Indirect cluster evidence. The 27-year age gap fits father-son, but the census states no relationship and Robert predates the John-Rose marriage by about twelve years.
Same census, Glenleslie house 21; Mary Glasgow's 1871 marriageMaryan, 17, was John's granddaughter. Mary Glasgow, 28, named father Alexander Glasgow.The ten-year age conflict excludes the proposed identity and removes this route to John as Alexander's father.
John and Margaret's 1846 marriage and 1851 Lisnagaver house 34John Glasgow-867 named his father as John Glasgow, farmer; Samuel was recorded as John's brother.Strong two-record chain for the brothers' father's name and occupation. It does not uniquely identify Glasgow-1022.
Rasharkin Second Presbyterian gravestonesThe stone erected by James Garvin Glasgo says his father John died in 1895 aged 78 and his mother Margaret Garvin died in 1892 aged 74.Direct family memorial evidence. The implied 1816/17 birth makes Glasgow-1022 a less comfortable father candidate than the 1851 age alone suggested.
1803 North Antrim agricultural census, record 5677John Glesco was recorded at Carnbuck, Loughguile, and standardised by the compiler as Glasgow.New age-compatible candidate occurrence. The record supplies no identifier connecting him to Glenleslie John.
1740 Protestant Householders' Return, record 2107; PRONI D2223/15/56Joh Glask was the sole Glasgow-form entry in Dunaghy, while the lease names John Glasgow jointly at Ballyboggy with James Wier.Strong evidence for an older local John and the best geographic father-or-grandfather candidate for John-1022; no child is named.
1796 North Antrim Flaxgrowers' ListNo Glasgow, Glasgo or Glask recipient appears in the covered North Antrim parishes.Bounded negative for the premium list, not an absence census.
FamilyTreeDNA Glasgow Project results, kits B580327 and 1002232; administrator comparison exportAlexander Glasgow-951 and the James J Glasgow-2738 line are confirmed R-FT20271 and form the closest displayed pairing, GD 3 at Y-111.Direct paternal genetic evidence for a shared male ancestor, but no named parent for John and no proof that the marker-only Robert Glasgow-1143 result lies on the same terminal branch.
1851 census, Lisnagaver houses 34-37John/Samuel were at 34, Alexander at 35, Watters at 36, and Thomas at 37.A small same-surname farming cluster. Enumeration order does not prove physical next-door residence or a minimum degree of kinship.
Daniel's original 1871 will and Daniel Neely Glasgow's 1888 marriageDaniel called late Thomas his brother and Daniel Neely his nephew; Daniel Neely named Thomas Glasgow, farmer, as his father and lived at Lisnagaver.High-confidence two-record proof that Daniel and Thomas of the Lisnagaver family were brothers.
Griffith's Valuation, RasharkinDaniel and Robert Glasgow were at Gortereghy; Alexander, John and Thomas were at adjoining Lisnagaver.Proves occupier names and places, not identities or relationships.
Robert and Jane's original 1866 marriageRobert Glasgow-938, 25, was a Lisnagaver farmer and son of Alexander, farmer; bride Jane Graham lived at Gortereghy.This younger Robert has a direct link to both townlands and is the materially better Griffith Robert candidate than Glasgow-1367.
PRONI valuation revision books VAL/12/B/4/17A, Gortereghy folio 21, and 17B, folio 22; 1864 scan, 1865-84 scanRobert Glasgow occupied the separate house at map reference 18c in 1864 and was carried into the next book. The adjoining 18b house was Daniel McCochrane's, not Daniel Glasgow's.Strong additional identity evidence for the younger Robert: he was a local farmer aged about 24 in 1864, while Glasgow-1367 would have been about 85. It also prevents treating the name-only Daniel and Robert entries as proved adjoining occupiers or relatives.
Rasharkin Presbyterian baptismsAlexander and Mary/Molly McAughern were at Gortereagh in 1837-38 and Lisnagaver by 1843-44.Contemporary evidence linking younger Alexander's family to both adjacent townlands.
1834 North Antrim tithe transcription, p. 134 of the PDFAlexander Glasgow and Robert Glasgow were the only named Glasgow tithe occupiers at Lisnagaver.Contemporary locality evidence, but neither man is uniquely identified and no relationship is stated. It does not place older Robert at Gortereghy.
North Antrim tithe transcription, Dunaghy parish, 1825Ballyboggy lists James Glasgow and James Glasgow junior among Henry, William and Thomas Alexander and James Wier.Strong local tenant-network evidence; junior distinguishes the two Jameses but does not by itself prove father and son or connect either to John-1022.
John Glasgow and Matilda Little's 1850 marriage; original register imageJohn Glasgow-2056, farmer of Killycurragh, named his father as Henry Glasgow, farmer.Excludes treating this profile as the 1851 nephew merely from name and age; Henry's relationship to John-1022 remains unproved.
Evidence assessmentWhat is supported, uncertain or disputed in the current case model.18 claims
15Unknown
11Original
4Derivative
2Tree Only

Documented or strongly supported

The Griffith Gortereghy Robert was probably Glasgow-938, son of younger Alexander Glasgow-951, not the elderly Glenleslie Robert Glasgow-1367.

strongly_supported5 linked evidence items

The younger Robert was proved at Lisnagaver in 1851 and his 1866 marriage calls him a Lisnagaver farmer, son of Alexander, while his bride resided at Gortereghy. PRONI revision books VAL/12/B/4/17A and 17B record Robert at Gortereghy house 18c from 1864. The older Robert was at Glenleslie in 1851 and would have been about 85 in 1864.

Daniel Glasgow-3896 and Thomas Glasgow-987 were brothers; younger Alexander Glasgow-951 was their probable brother, making Glasgow-938 the probable nephew of the Gortereghy Daniel.

strongly_supported3 linked evidence items

Daniel's original will and Daniel Neely's marriage form a direct two-record sibling chain. Alexander's place, age and family tradition support but do not state the additional sibling link.

Working hypotheses and conflicts

John Glasgow was recorded in Glenleslie townland (c.1751–c.1852).

possible1 linked evidence item

Glenleslie / Lisnagaver locality

John Glasgow was son of John Glasgow

possible1 linked evidence item

The younger John's 1846 marriage names father John, farmer; the older John is the best identified local candidate, not a unique match.

Samuel Glasgow was son of John Glasgow

possible1 linked evidence item

The 1851 census proves Samuel was the younger John's brother; the same residual half-sibling and father-identity questions apply.

Robert Glasco was son of, possibly by an earlier partner John Glasgow

possible1 linked evidence item

Robert and John were older Antrim-born farmers in the Glenleslie 1851 enumeration cluster; the age gap fits, but the census states no relationship and Robert predates John's recorded 1791 marriage.

John Glasgow was unknown paternal collateral of Older Alexander Glasgow

possible1 linked evidence item

Brother, father-son, and more distant cousin relationships remain possible. Locality and shared paternal-line evidence justify the question but select none of them.

John Glasgow-867 and Samuel Glasgow-2908 were brothers whose likely shared father was named John Glasgow and was a farmer; Glasgow-1022 is the best current identity candidate but is not proved.

possible2 linked evidence items

The 1851 census explicitly calls Samuel John's brother and John's original 1846 marriage names his father. The older John matches name, occupation, generation and county, but no record connects him directly to Lisnagaver.

Robert Glasgow-1367 belongs to the Glenleslie cluster and may be an uncertain son of Glasgow-1022 by an unknown pre-1791 partner, but the census does not prove it.

possible2 linked evidence items

The two Antrim-born farmers were 27 years apart in Glenleslie houses 21 and 23. Robert was born about twelve years before John and Rose's reported 1791 marriage, and an unrelated household intervened.

Case-file assessments

Extended-family identity audit, 13 August 2026

Glasgow-1022 · updated 2026-08-13

The relationship labels in Glenleslie house 21 have now been audited against the local research files, the current One-Tree export, live WikiTree searches, the surviving Dunaghy census transcription and the free civil-registration index. They have not all been identified.

Census personPresent status
Ann Glasgow, 18, granddaughterRepresented by [[Glasgow-3168]], but her parents, later life and descendants remain unknown.
Maryan Glasgow, 17, granddaughterNo defensible profile. [[Glasgow-3167]] is a different Mary Glasgow, born about 1843 and daughter of Alexander Glasgow-951.
Jane Grimes, 5, and James Grimes, nine months, grandchildrenNeither child nor their parents has been identified. They are the only Grimes entries in the surviving Dunaghy returns. No exact local marriage or matching Antrim-born 1901 household was found. A James Grimes who died in Ballycastle in 1870 aged 22 is a close but unproved candidate; the index gives no relative or original image. A Jane Grimes who died at Armagh in 1897 was Patrick Grimes's wife and is unlikely to be the child born with that surname. Live duplicate searching found Grimes-1800, born about 1850, but that profile belongs to a County Sligo family. Migration, childhood death, an earlier marriage, or a spelling variant remain possible.
John Glasgow, 40, nephew, married in 1839Not identified. The complete surviving 1851 Glasgow census set distinguishes him from Robert's same-aged son John, then in America, and from [[Glasgow-867]], who simultaneously headed Lisnagaver house 34. [[Glasgow-2056]] named Henry as father and married in 1850; [[Glasgow-2407]] was a bachelor in 1865. All conflict with the census nephew. His 1839 marriage predates civil registration and no residence or spouse is supplied.
William Alexander, deceased brother-in-lawNot identified. The label supports an Alexander connection to John or Rose, but does not prove Rose's birth surname because brother-in-law could describe more than one relationship.

The best no-fee continuation is to search the Grimes children under spelling variants and migration records, and to reconstruct every age-compatible John Glasgow who married about 1839. Those two routes can expose an otherwise unnamed child and sibling of John without requiring a PRONI copy order.

Parentage and Y-DNA synthesis, 13 August 2026

Glasgow-1022 · updated 2026-08-13

No inspected record names John's father. The Y-DNA does, however, narrow the kind of relationship worth pursuing. Alexander Glasgow-951 (kit B580327) and the James J Glasgow Glasgow-2738 line (kit 1002232) are both confirmed R-FT20271 Big Y lines. They are genetic distance 3 at Y-111, differ at four of 662 compared Big Y STRs, and share the derived DYS714=27 state. The local SAPP model places their paternal branching node at about 1750, with a displayed 95% interval of 1700-1750. That is a search window, not a proved date: the same uncalibrated model places a known control relationship about a century too recently.

This result proves that Alexander's direct paternal line and James J's tested line share a male Glasgow ancestor. It does not identify John as that ancestor. The kit reported for Robert Glasgow-1143 has only marker testing, is genetic distance 10 from Alexander at Y-111, and has no confirmed downstream Big Y placement. Using the present WikiTree pedigree to make John a descendant of Robert, then using that assumed pedigree to interpret the marker match, would be circular.

The best documentary placement remains the Dunaghy-Kilconway tenant network. John could only have fathered Robert Glasgow-1367 or older Alexander Glasgow-3904 through an unidentified relationship predating his reported 1791 marriage to Rose. A brother/cousin relationship among the older household heads requires fewer assumptions than making both men John's sons. Leave John's own parents unknown and keep the broader paternal relationship as a research cluster rather than a structured edge.

A new candidate occurrence was found in the 1803 North Antrim agricultural census: John Glesco at Carnbuck, Loughguile parish. He is the only entry in the covered parishes that the compiler standardised as Glasgow rather than Glass. John Glasgow-1022, then about 52, is age-compatible, but the census gives no age, spouse, occupation or relation and Carnbuck is not Glenleslie. The name should remain a candidate occurrence, not be folded into his biography as fact.

Exact-name, spelling-variant, residence and townland searches of the volunteer Registry of Deeds index found no deed naming John or a relative at Glenleslie, Lisnagaver or Carnbuck. The negative is bounded by the incomplete index and does not establish that no sublease or unindexed deed existed.

The complete published North Antrim portion of the 1796 Flaxgrowers' List has no Glasgow, Glasgo or Glask entry. This is a bounded negative only: it records premium recipients rather than all householders and cannot show that the family had left Dunaghy.<ref>[https://www.billmacafee.com/1796flaxgrowerslist/1796flaxgrowersantrim.pdf Bill MacAfee, ''Flaxgrowers' List for the Parishes in North Antrim, 1796''].</ref>

Ellen's 1847 workhouse identity

Glasgow-1022 · updated 2026-08-13

Ballymena Workhouse admission 4130 records [[Glasgow-1368|Ellen Glasgow]], age 22, married and deserted, Presbyterian, of Glenleslie, on 13 May 1847. Her name, age, status and townland closely match John's married daughter Ellen, age 26, in the 1851 household. This independently confirms Ellen's local identity and married status.

The entry does not name Ellen's husband. The 1851 return calls Jane and James Grimes John's grandchildren but does not call them Ellen's children. The current Grimes spouse and child attachments should therefore remain uncertain. This source strengthens John-to-Ellen; it does not identify John's parents or prove Rose's maternity.

Research questionsOpen problems, missing bridges and the next records to inspect.0 open

No formal open question is recorded for this person.

Next records to inspect

  1. marriage — 1831 Irish Census (http://www.census.nationalarchives.ie/search/results.jsp?searchMoreVisible=false&census_year=1831&surname=Glasgow&firstname=&county19011911=&county1821=&county1831=&county1841=&county1851=&parish=&ward=&barony=&townland=&houseNumber=&ded=&age=&sex=&search=Search&exact=1&ageInMonths=&relationToHead=&religion=&education=&occupation=&marriageStatus=&yearsMarried=&birthplace=&nativeCountry=&language=&deafdumb=&causeOfDeath=&yearOfDeath=&familiesNumber=&malesNumber=&femalesNumber=&maleServNumber=&femaleServNumber=&estChurchNumber=&romanCatNumber=&presbNumber=&protNumber=&marriageYears=&childrenBorn=&childrenLiving=)
  2. research assessment — Bill MacAfee, North Antrim Tithe Applotment Books arranged in document order (https://www.billmacafee.com/182030stithe/tithenorthantrimrevisionorder.pdf), Dunaghy parish, Ballyboggy, 1825.
  3. marriage — Additional searches The National Archives 1831 surname search (http://www.census.nationalarchives.ie/search/results.jsp?searchMoreVisible=false&census_year=1831&surname=Glasgow&firstname=&county19011911=&county1821=&county1831=&county1841=&county1851=&parish=&ward=&barony=&townland=&houseNumber=&ded=&age=&sex=&search=Search&exact=1&ageInMonths=&relationToHead=&religion=&education=&occupation=&marriageStatus=&yearsMarr

Case-file priorities and cautions

Recommended working attachments

Glasgow-1022 · updated 2026-08-13

ChildProposed fatherMotherStatus
John Glasgow-867John Glasgow-1022UnknownUncertain; low-moderate after gravestone review
Samuel Glasgow-2908John Glasgow-1022UnknownUncertain; moderate

The next discovery targets are the parents of Ann and Mary Ann Glasgow, the mother of the Grimes grandchildren, and the father of the forty-year-old nephew John. Those identities can reveal additional children and a sibling of John-1022 without disturbing reasonable uncertain attachments already used for navigation.

Do not attach the older Alexander Glasgow-3904 to Glasgow-1022 as either brother or son. Record the possible collateral relationship in notes until a lease, revision book, church record, will, or DNA triangulation distinguishes the alternatives.

Sources and provenanceStructured citations and source-quality classifications.32 sources

Source or provenance: quality describes the record layer, not every conclusion drawn from it.

  1. derivative 1851 Irish Census Returns: detailed comma-delimited transcription (https://durrushistory.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/1851irishcensusreturnscommadelimitedtextfilejul24_071.pdf), Glenleslie household 21.
  2. unknown Bill MacAfee, 1851 Census, Barony of Kilconway (https://www.billmacafee.com/census/1851censuskilconway.pdf), Glenleslie household 21.
  3. unknown 1831 Irish Census
  4. original IrishGenealogy.ie (https://www.irishgenealogy.ie/view/?record_id=cima-3156063), civil marriage of John Glasgow and Margaret Garvin, 16 November 1846.
  5. original 1851 Census of Ireland (https://www.census.nationalarchives.ie/pages/1851/Antrim/Kilconway/Rasharkin/Lisnagaver/34/), Lisnagaver household 34.
  6. derivative Pauline O'Keeffe and Helen Evans, Rasharkin Second Presbyterian Church headstones (https://genealogy.torrens.org/BannValley/church/RasharkinP/graveyard.html), transcription made August 2004, Glasgo memorial erected by James Garvin Glasgo.
  7. original John Glasgow, a farmer at Cross in Ballyclug, married Rachel Grey in 1865. The original certificate calls him a bachelor and names his father as John Glasgow, farmer. General Register Office of Ireland, civil marriage register (https://www.irishgenealogy.ie/files/civil/marriage_returns/marriages_1865/11578/8260226.pdf), John Glasgow and Rachel Grey, 11 September 1865.
  8. original General Register Office of Ireland, civil death register (https://civilrecords.irishgenealogy.ie/churchrecords/images/deaths_returns/deaths_1874/020673/7253774.pdf), John Glasgow, Cross, 27 January 1874.
  9. original General Register Office of Ireland, civil marriage register (https://www.irishgenealogy.ie/files/civil/marriage_returns/marriages_1850/09386/5399841.pdf), John Glasgow and Matilda Little, 1850.
  10. original 1851 Census of Ireland (https://www.census.nationalarchives.ie/pages/1851/Antrim/Kilconway/Dunaghy/Glenleslie/23/), Glenleslie household 23.
  11. unknown Bill MacAfee, Protestant Householders' Returns, 1740 (https://www.billmacafee.com/1740returns/1740religiousreturnsulstername.pdf), record 2107, Joh Glask, Dunaghy.
  12. unknown Public Record Office of Northern Ireland, D2223/15/56, Ballyboggy title-deed bundle, lease of 1740; PRONI eCatalogue (https://apps.proni.gov.uk/eCatNI_IE/SearchPage.aspx).
  13. unknown Bill MacAfee, North Antrim Tithe Applotment Books arranged in document order (https://www.billmacafee.com/182030stithe/tithenorthantrimrevisionorder.pdf), Dunaghy parish, Ballyboggy, 1825.
  14. tree_only FamilyTreeDNA Glasgow Surname Project, public Y-DNA results (https://www.familytreedna.com/public/Glasgow?iframe=ydna-results-overview), kits B580327 and 1002232.
  15. tree_only WikiTree profile export for Glasgow-1022
  16. derivative 1803 North Antrim agricultural census
  17. original Civil marriage register of John Glasgow and Margaret Garvin (), 16 November 1846; John Glasgow, bachelor, farmer, of Lisnagaver, parish of Rasharkin; father John Glasgow, farmer; Margaret Garvin, spinster (accessed 17 July 2026
  18. original National Archives of Ireland, 1851 census (https://www.census.nationalarchives.ie/pages/1851/Antrim/Kilconway/Rasharkin/Lisnagaver/34/), residents of house 34, Lisnagaver, Rasharkin, Kilconway, County Antrim; Samuel Glasgow, aged 60, brother of the head, unmarried linen weaver, born in County Londonderry (accessed 17 July 2026).
  19. derivative "1851 Irish Census Returns: comma-delimited transcription" (https://durrushistory.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/1851irishcensusreturnscommadelimitedtextfilejul24_071.pdf), Glenleslie household 23, p. 103 (accessed 16 July 2026).
  20. unknown Controlled relationship assessment
  21. unknown ../Glasgow-867/sources/john_glasgow_margaret_garvin_marriage_1846.pdf
  22. original https://www.census.nationalarchives.ie/pages/1851/Antrim/Kilconway/Rasharkin/Lisnagaver/34/
  23. unknown ../Glasgow-1367/sources/1851_census_glenleslie_house_23_page_1.pdf
  24. unknown https://durrushistory.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/1851irishcensusreturnscommadelimitedtextfilejul24_071.pdf
  25. original https://www.census.nationalarchives.ie/pages/1851/Antrim/Kilconway/Rasharkin/Lisnagaver/35/
  26. original https://civilrecords.irishgenealogy.ie/churchrecords/images/marriage_returns/marriages_1866/11531/8240963.pdf
  27. unknown https://www.failteromhat.com/griffiths/antrim/rasharkin.htm
  28. unknown sources/proni_VAL-12-B-4-17A_gortereghy_folio21.jpg
  29. unknown sources/proni_VAL-12-B-4-17B_gortereghy_folio22.jpg
  30. unknown ../Glasgow-3896/sources/daniel_glasgow_1871_will_manifest.md
Technical profile and raw captureDataset metadata, machine dossier and captured WikiTree biography.Advanced

WikiTree profile information

Dataset: ONT_Glasco_2026-08-18T16_05.json · generated 2026-08-20

Machine-readable dossier

WikiTree biography, citations and relationship snapshot

Glasgow-1022 was captured 2026-08-19T10:47:57+00:00; WikiTree profile revision 2026-08-19.

Profile location claims

EventDateLocationStatus
birthCounty Antrim, IrelandWikiTree profile field
deathCounty Antrim, Ireland, United KingdomWikiTree profile field
marriage1791-00-00Dunaghy, Antrim, IrelandWikiTree relationship field

Immediate relationship snapshot

RelationshipPersonWikiTree IDDates and places returned
ParentsWilliam GlasgowGlasgow-15051708-00-00 · County Antrim, Ireland · 1783-00-00 · Larne
ChildrenSamuel GlasgowGlasgow-29081791-00-00 · County Londonderry, Ireland · 1875-08-17 · Lisnagaver, Rasharkin, County Antrim, Ireland
ChildrenJohn GlasgowGlasgow-8671801-00-00 · Rasharkin, Kilconway, Antrim · 0000-00-00
ChildrenGeorge GlasgowGlasgow-14001815-00-00 · County Antrim, Ireland · 0000-00-00
ChildrenNancy GlasgowGlasgow-13691815-00-00 · Dunaghy, Kilconway, Antrim · 1847-00-00
ChildrenAndrew GlasgowGlasgow-10501818-00-00 · Dunaghy, Kilconway, Antrim · 1848-00-00
ChildrenEllen GlasgowGlasgow-13681825-00-00 · Dunaghy, Kilconway, Antrim · 0000-00-00
SiblingsHugh GlasgowGlasgow-39311722-00-00 · Tamlaght, County Londonderry, Ireland · 0000-00-00
SiblingsJames GlasgowGlasgow-15091737-00-00 · County Antrim, Ireland · 1802-00-00
SiblingsUnknown GlasgowGlasgow-39051740-00-00 · Inishrush, Tamlaght O'Crilly, County Londonderry, Ireland · 0000-00-00
SpousesRose AlexanderAlexander-169671774-00-00 · 0000-00-00 · 1791-00-00 · Dunaghy, Antrim, Ireland

Profile categories

Estimated_Birth_Date Glasgow Name Study Glasgow_Name_Study

Record-bearing passages

  • Biography An earlier working hypothesis proposed Robert Glasgow (abt.1710-abt.1772) as John's father based on Y-DNA, naming patterns, locations and ages. See Hypothesis: Parentage of John Glasgow-1022. No reviewed record proves this relationship.
  • A second working hypothesis considered Robert Glasgow (abt.1724-) because of the name Robert and the branch's Y-DNA proximity to Alexander Glasgow. This is also unproved. Residency and Family Life in Ireland1851 Census By the time of the 1851 Antrim Census, John Glasgow is recorded as being 100 years old, suggesting a birth year around 1751. He was married to Rose Alexander, aged 80, and they resided in Glenleslie, Dunaghy, Antrim. 1851 Irish Census Returns: detailed comma-delimited transcription (https://durrushistory.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/1851irishcensusreturnscommadelimitedtextfilejul24_071.pdf), Glenleslie household 21. Bill MacAfee, 1851 Census, Barony of Kilconway (https://www.billmacafee.com/census/1851censuskilconway.pdf), Glenleslie household 21. Living with them were:
  • Andrew Glasgow (1818-1848) (aged 30), their son, a linen weaver who had died in 1848 from consumption.

    • Ellen Glasgow (abt.1825-) (aged 26), their daughter, a linen weaver who could read and write.
    • Nancy Glasgow (abt.1815-abt.1847) (aged 36), their daughter who had died in 1847 from dysentery.
    • John Glasgow (aged 40), their nephew, a vagrant who could not read. ** This nephew is not John Glasgow, whose 1850 marriage names Henry Glasgow as his father and conflicts with the census nephew's reported 1839 marriage.
    • Ann Glasgow (1833-) (aged 18) and Mary Ann or Maryan Glasgow (aged 17; no compatible WikiTree profile identified), their granddaughters, both linen weavers.
    • Jane Grimes (aged 5) and James Grimes (aged 9 months), their grandchildren
  • Sarah Alexander (aged 34), a visitor, likely a relative of Rose.

    • Barbera McKillop (aged 10), a servant winding quills.
    • William Alexander (aged 60), Rose's brother, who had died in 1846 from rheumatism.
  • : {| border="0" cellpadding="4" |1851 Census Data - Head, Wife, Sons, Daughters |} {| border="1" cellpadding="4" width="100%" |- bgcolor=#E1F0B4 | Surname || Forename || Relation || Age (Years) || Age (Months) || Occupation || Education || Birth Place || Cause of Death || Year of Death |- | Glasgow || John || Head Of Family || 100 || - || Farmer || Read || Antrim || - || - |- | Glasgow || Rose || Wife || 80 || - || None || Read || Antrim || - || - |- | Glasgow || Andrew || Son || 30 || - || Linen Weaver || - || - || Consumption || 1848 |- | Glasgow || Ellen || Daughter || 26 || - || Linen Weaver || Read & Write || Antrim || - || - |- | Glasgow || Nancy || Daughter || 36 || - || None || - || - || Dysentery || 1847 |} : {| border="0" cellpadding="4" |1851 Census Data - Grandchildren / Nephew / Nieces |} {| border="1" cellpadding="4" width="100%" |- bgcolor=#E1F0B4 | Surname || Forename || Relation || Age (Years) || Age (Months) || Occupation || Education || Birth Place || Cause of Death || Year of Death |- | Glasgow || John || Nephew || 40 || - || Vagrant || Cannot Read || Antrim || - || - |- | Glasgow || Ann || Grand Daughter || 18 || - || Linen Weaver || Read & Write || Antrim || - || - |- | Glasgow || Maryan || Grand Daughter || 17 || - || Linen Weaver || Read || Antrim || - || - |- | Grimes || Jane || Grand Daughter || 5 || - || None || Cannot Read || Antrim || - || - |- | Grimes || James || Grand Son || - || 9 || None || Cannot Read || Antrim || - || - |} : {| border="0" cellpadding="4" |1851 Census Data - Non-Glasgow Family Members |} {| border="1" cellpadding="4" width="100%" |- bgcolor=#E1F0B4 | Surname || Forename || Relation || Age (Years) || Age (Months) || Occupation || Education || Birth Place || Cause of Death || Year of Death |- | Alexander || Sarah || Visitor || 34 || - || None || Read || Antrim || - || - |- | McKillop || Barbera || Servant || 10 || - || Winding Quills || Cannot Read || Antrim || - || - |- | Alexander || Wm || Brother In Law || 60 || - || Labourer || - || - || Rheumatism || 1846 |}
  • The presence of William Alexander (Brother-in-Law) and Sarah Alexander (Visitor) suggests that Rose's maiden name was Alexander.

    • The ages of Rose and her children imply that she may have been beyond typical childbearing age when they were born, indicating:
    • Rose may have been John Glasgow's second wife.
    • From the 1851 Census, John appeared to be having children from at least ages 64-74 ** 35 years prior where he could've been having children. ** He would've been 28 when he had Robert Glasgow (abt.1779-) if it is his son.
    • There may be inaccuracies in the recorded ages.
    • The grandchildren's parentage is uncertain:
    • Ann and Maryan are unlikely to be Andrew's children due to his young age at their births.
    • The Grimes grandchildren are born too late to be Nancy's children and too early to be Ellens. Unknown Grimes (abt.1815-) Speculation and Context John Glasgow's advanced age and the ages of his children raise questions about the accuracy of the records and the relationships within the household:
  • Rose's Age and Maternity: If Rose was 80 in 1851, she would have been approximately 44 when Nancy was born, 50 when Andrew was born, and 54 when Ellen was born. These ages are beyond typical childbearing years for the era, suggesting Rose may not be the biological mother of these children.

    • It's possible Rose was John's second wife, and the children are from an earlier marriage.
    • Alternatively, there may be inaccuracies in the recorded ages.
  • Grandchildren's Parentage:

    • Ann (18) and Maryan (17) are too old to be Andrew's children, as he would have been 12 and 13 at their births. They may be daughters of another, unlisted child of John.
    • Jane Grimes (5) could be Nancy's child, given Nancy died in 1847, but James Grimes (9 months) was born after Nancy's death, suggesting another mother.
  • Y-DNA analysis indicates:

    • A 5-step genetic distance (suggesting a Most Recent Common Ancestor [MRCA] around 1650) between descendants of this branch and the Melanchthon branch.
    • A 3-step genetic distance (MRCA around 1750) from Robert Glasgow (abt.1780-abt.1860), who settled in South Carolina. Potential Ancestry John Glasgow lists his birthplace as Antrim, reinforcing his roots in the region. This supports the possibility that he is descended from:
  • John Glasgow (bef.1750-), born in Midlothian, Scotland. ** Born in Mid Calder, Midlothian, Scotland, whereas this John lists his native county as Antrim.

    • John Glasgow (1740-), son of James Glasgow, recorded in the 1766 Religious Census for the Parish of Derryloran, County Tyrone, Ireland. ** Too old to be this John
    • John Glasgow (bef.1747-) "m. Rose Allan in 1769. Born perhaps 1745-48? Probably not the same as John2 who was a ship’s captain in 1739" ** Could Rose Allan be a misinterpretation of Rose Alex? *** Father is listed as John Glasgow (bef.1730-) as born before 1739 based on the record of his sons birth to Margaret Anderson in West Calder, Midlothian. Research Notes1831 Census1831 Census Note: These Glasgow's may be a seperate Londonderry branch, descended from John Glasgow (abt.1735-abt.1785) and/or Robert Glasgow (abt.1737-abt.1787). John is listed as having no females in his family, Ellen and Nancy should've appeared here if this is the same John who appears on the 1851 Census.
  • John Glasgow first appears in historical records in the 1831 Irish Census, residing in Lissane, Loughinshollin, Londonderry. His household included nine individuals, 3 of which were males. Alongside him, Robert Glasgow is also listed, with a household of three males, suggesting a possible familial connection. 1831 Irish Census (http://www.census.nationalarchives.ie/search/results.jsp?searchMoreVisible=false&census_year=1831&surname=Glasgow&firstname=&county19011911=&county1821=&county1831=&county1841=&county1851=&parish=&ward=&barony=&townland=&houseNumber=&ded=&age=&sex=&search=Search&exact=1&ageInMonths=&relationToHead=&religion=&education=&occupation=&marriageStatus=&yearsMarried=&birthplace=&nativeCountry=&language=&deafdumb=&causeOfDeath=&yearOfDeath=&familiesNumber=&malesNumber=&femalesNumber=&maleServNumber=&femaleServNumber=&estChurchNumber=&romanCatNumber=&presbNumber=&protNumber=&marriageYears=&childrenBorn=&childrenLiving=)
  • {| border="0" cellpadding="4" |1831 Census Data |} {| border="1" cellpadding="4" width="100%" |- bgcolor=#E1F0B4 | Surname || Forename || Townland/Street || House Number || Barony || Parish || County || Number of families in each || Number of males in family || Number of females in family || Number in Established Church || Number of Roman Catholics || Number of Presbyterians |- | Glasgow || John || Dromain || 2 || Loughinshollin || Lissane || Londonderry || 1 || 3 || - || 2 || 2 || 3 |- | Glasgow || Robt || Coltrim || 2 || Loughinshollin || Lissane || Londonderry || 1 || 6 || 5 || - || - || 11 |}
  • John Glasgow (1780-1840) was born in Londonderry but had already emigrated to America by 1796. ** Hugh Glasgow (1739-abt.1831) the father of the aforementioned John and brother of John Glasgow (abt.1735-abt.1785), was also born in Londonderry. ** His father Hugh Glasgow (abt.1706-) was born in County Tyrone Potential for Further Research

    • Marriage Records: Locating John and Rose's marriage record could clarify Rose's age and their marriage date.
    • Baptismal Records: Could confirm the children's parentage and correct ages.
    • Death Records: May provide additional details about family relationships.
    • Y-DNA Analysis: Continued genetic research could confirm connections to the Melanchthon branch. Current researchOther possible children John Glasgow and Samuel Glasgow of Lisnagaver were brothers. The younger John's 1846 marriage names his father as John Glasgow, farmer, and the 1851 census explicitly calls Samuel his brother. IrishGenealogy.ie (https://www.irishgenealogy.ie/view/?record_id=cima-3156063), civil marriage of John Glasgow and Margaret Garvin, 16 November 1846. 1851 Census of Ireland (https://www.census.nationalarchives.ie/pages/1851/Antrim/Kilconway/Rasharkin/Lisnagaver/34/), Lisnagaver household 34.
  • The younger John's family gravestone says that he died in 1895 aged seventy- eight, implying birth about 1816 or 1817, although the 1851 return reported him as fifty. Pauline O'Keeffe and Helen Evans, Rasharkin Second Presbyterian Church headstones (https://genealogy.torrens.org/BannValley/church/RasharkinP/graveyard.html), transcription made August 2004, Glasgo memorial erected by James Garvin Glasgo. If the gravestone age is correct, this John would have been about sixty-five when the younger John was born. He remains a possible identity for the named father, but the shared name and occupation do not identify him uniquely. Both relationships remain uncertain.
  • George Glasgow, whose wife Sarah was also an Alexander, headed the immediately preceding Glenleslie household. His location, age and Alexander association make him a plausible son, but no record calls him John's son.
  • John Glasgow, a farmer at Cross in Ballyclug, married Rachel Grey in 1865. The original certificate calls him a bachelor and names his father as John Glasgow, farmer. General Register Office of Ireland, civil marriage register (https://www.irishgenealogy.ie/files/civil/marriage_returns/marriages_1865/11578/8260226.pdf), John Glasgow and Rachel Grey, 11 September 1865. His 1874 death age implies birth about 1809. General Register Office of Ireland, civil death register (https://civilrecords.irishgenealogy.ie/churchrecords/images/deaths_returns/deaths_1874/020673/7253774.pdf), John Glasgow, Cross, 27 January 1874. He is another possible son of a local John farmer. He is not the 1851 nephew, who was recorded as married since 1839. John Glasgow of Cross, who died in 1836, is a competing and geographically closer father candidate, so no attachment to this John is justified yet. Unresolved grandchildren and nephew Ann and Mary Ann Glasgow retained the Glasgow surname, but their father or mother has not been identified. Jane and James Grimes imply that another child of John had formed a Grimes family. No compatible civil marriage was found for Jane Grimes in the Ballymena district after 1860.
  • The forty-year-old nephew is especially important because his father should identify a brother or brother-equivalent of John. John Glasgow was considered, but his 1850 marriage names his father as Henry Glasgow, farmer, and no record makes that Henry John's brother. General Register Office of Ireland, civil marriage register (https://www.irishgenealogy.ie/files/civil/marriage_returns/marriages_1850/09386/5399841.pdf), John Glasgow and Matilda Little, 1850. Parentage and local cluster No inspected record identifies John's parents. Robert Glasgow was previously attached as his father, but the reviewed Kilwaughter church and petition material never names John as Robert's son. The relationship is a tree reconstruction rather than a documented fact.
  • William Glasgow of Larne is currently retained as John's uncertain father. Their ages are compatible, but no baptism, will, deed or church entry names John as William's son, and no record bridges William's Larne property to John's later Glenleslie household.
  • Robert Glasgow headed Glenleslie household 23. He was born about 1779, twelve years before John and Rose's reported marriage, and the census does not call him John's son. He was therefore removed from this family and his parents were left blank. 1851 Census of Ireland (https://www.census.nationalarchives.ie/pages/1851/Antrim/Kilconway/Dunaghy/Glenleslie/23/), Glenleslie household 23.
  • The older Ballyboggy records provide a competing local ancestry. The 1740 Protestant Householders' Return records Joh Glask in Dunaghy, and a three-life lease identifies John Glasgow and James Wier as joint Ballyboggy tenants. Bill MacAfee, Protestant Householders' Returns, 1740 (https://www.billmacafee.com/1740returns/1740religiousreturnsulstername.pdf), record 2107, Joh Glask, Dunaghy. Public Record Office of Northern Ireland, D2223/15/56, Ballyboggy title-deed bundle, lease of 1740; PRONI eCatalogue (https://apps.proni.gov.uk/eCatNI_IE/SearchPage.aspx). He was an adult before this John was born and is therefore a plausible father, grandfather or collateral relative. The lease description does not name his children.
  • James Glasgow and James Glasgow junior were among the Ballyboggy tithe occupiers in 1825. Ballyboggy adjoins Glenleslie, and the same records repeatedly contain Alexander and Wier households. Bill MacAfee, North Antrim Tithe Applotment Books arranged in document order (https://www.billmacafee.com/182030stithe/tithenorthantrimrevisionorder.pdf), Dunaghy parish, Ballyboggy, 1825. This is evidence for a long-running local tenant network, not a parent-child chain. Y-DNA A direct paternal descendant of Alexander Glasgow of Lisnagaver and the tested line of James J Glasgow share the confirmed R-FT20271 branch and are genetic distance three at Y-111. The result supports a shared male Glasgow ancestor, probably several generations earlier, but it does not identify John as that ancestor or distinguish whether the Glenleslie and Lisnagaver household heads were brothers, cousins or more distant relatives. FamilyTreeDNA Glasgow Surname Project, public Y-DNA results (https://www.familytreedna.com/public/Glasgow?iframe=ydna-results-overview), kits B580327 and 1002232. Additional searches The National Archives 1831 surname search (http://www.census.nationalarchives.ie/search/results.jsp?searchMoreVisible=false&census_year=1831&surname=Glasgow&firstname=&county19011911=&county1821=&county1831=&county1841=&county1851=&parish=&ward=&barony=&townland=&houseNumber=&ded=&age=&sex=&search=Search&exact=1&ageInMonths=&relationToHead=&religion=&education=&occupation=&marriageStatus=&yearsMarried=&birthplace=&nativeCountry=&language=&deafdumb=&causeOfDeath=&yearOfDeath=&familiesNumber=&malesNumber=&femalesNumber=&maleServNumber=&femaleServNumber=&estChurchNumber=&romanCatNumber=&presbNumber=&protNumber=&marriageYears=&childrenBorn=&childrenLiving=) and the derivative FamilySearch tree (https://www.familysearch.org/tree/person/details/MM3D-24G) are retained as research leads; neither identifies John's parents. See Also link title (placeholder URL omitted)

Profile source citations

  1. 1851 Irish Census Returns: detailed comma-delimited transcription (https://durrushistory.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/1851irishcensusreturnscommadelimitedtextfilejul24_071.pdf), Glenleslie household 21. source link 1
  2. Bill MacAfee, 1851 Census, Barony of Kilconway (https://www.billmacafee.com/census/1851censuskilconway.pdf), Glenleslie household 21. source link 1
  3. 1831 Irish Census (http://www.census.nationalarchives.ie/search/results.jsp?searchMoreVisible=false&census_year=1831&surname=Glasgow&firstname=&county19011911=&county1821=&county1831=&county1841=&county1851=&parish=&ward=&barony=&townland=&houseNumber=&ded=&age=&sex=&search=Search&exact=1&ageInMonths=&relationToHead=&religion=&education=&occupation=&marriageStatus=&yearsMarried=&birthplace=&nativeCountry=&language=&deafdumb=&causeOfDeath=&yearOfDeath=&familiesNumber=&malesNumber=&femalesNumber=&maleServNumber=&femaleServNumber=&estChurchNumber=&romanCatNumber=&presbNumber=&protNumber=&marriageYears=&childrenBorn=&childrenLiving=) source link 1
  4. IrishGenealogy.ie (https://www.irishgenealogy.ie/view/?record_id=cima-3156063), civil marriage of John Glasgow and Margaret Garvin, 16 November 1846. source link 1
  5. 1851 Census of Ireland (https://www.census.nationalarchives.ie/pages/1851/Antrim/Kilconway/Rasharkin/Lisnagaver/34/), Lisnagaver household 34. source link 1
  6. Pauline O'Keeffe and Helen Evans, Rasharkin Second Presbyterian Church headstones (https://genealogy.torrens.org/BannValley/church/RasharkinP/graveyard.html), transcription made August 2004, Glasgo memorial erected by James Garvin Glasgo. source link 1
  7. John Glasgow, a farmer at Cross in Ballyclug, married Rachel Grey in 1865. The original certificate calls him a bachelor and names his father as John Glasgow, farmer. General Register Office of Ireland, civil marriage register (https://www.irishgenealogy.ie/files/civil/marriage_returns/marriages_1865/11578/8260226.pdf), John Glasgow and Rachel Grey, 11 September 1865. source link 1
  8. General Register Office of Ireland, civil death register (https://civilrecords.irishgenealogy.ie/churchrecords/images/deaths_returns/deaths_1874/020673/7253774.pdf), John Glasgow, Cross, 27 January 1874. source link 1
  9. General Register Office of Ireland, civil marriage register (https://www.irishgenealogy.ie/files/civil/marriage_returns/marriages_1850/09386/5399841.pdf), John Glasgow and Matilda Little, 1850. source link 1
  10. 1851 Census of Ireland (https://www.census.nationalarchives.ie/pages/1851/Antrim/Kilconway/Dunaghy/Glenleslie/23/), Glenleslie household 23. source link 1
  11. Bill MacAfee, Protestant Householders' Returns, 1740 (https://www.billmacafee.com/1740returns/1740religiousreturnsulstername.pdf), record 2107, Joh Glask, Dunaghy. source link 1
  12. Public Record Office of Northern Ireland, D2223/15/56, Ballyboggy title-deed bundle, lease of 1740; PRONI eCatalogue (https://apps.proni.gov.uk/eCatNI_IE/SearchPage.aspx). source link 1
  13. Bill MacAfee, North Antrim Tithe Applotment Books arranged in document order (https://www.billmacafee.com/182030stithe/tithenorthantrimrevisionorder.pdf), Dunaghy parish, Ballyboggy, 1825. source link 1
  14. FamilyTreeDNA Glasgow Surname Project, public Y-DNA results (https://www.familytreedna.com/public/Glasgow?iframe=ydna-results-overview), kits B580327 and 1002232. source link 1

Other external links in the profile

Full captured biography text
Biography
An earlier working hypothesis proposed Robert Glasgow (abt.1710-abt.1772) as John's father based on Y-DNA, naming patterns, locations and ages. See Hypothesis: Parentage of John Glasgow-1022. No reviewed record proves this relationship.

A second working hypothesis considered Robert Glasgow (abt.1724-) because of the name Robert and the branch's Y-DNA proximity to Alexander Glasgow. This is also unproved.
Residency and Family Life in Ireland1851 Census
By the time of the 1851 Antrim Census, John Glasgow is recorded as being 100 years old, suggesting a birth year around 1751. He was married to Rose Alexander, aged 80, and they resided in Glenleslie, Dunaghy, Antrim. 1851 Irish Census Returns: detailed comma-delimited transcription (https://durrushistory.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/1851irishcensusreturnscommadelimitedtextfilejul24_071.pdf), Glenleslie household 21. Bill MacAfee, 1851 Census, Barony of Kilconway (https://www.billmacafee.com/census/1851censuskilconway.pdf), Glenleslie household 21. Living with them were:

* Andrew Glasgow (1818-1848) (aged 30), their son, a linen weaver who had died in 1848 from consumption.
* Ellen Glasgow (abt.1825-) (aged 26), their daughter, a linen weaver who could read and write.
* Nancy Glasgow (abt.1815-abt.1847) (aged 36), their daughter who had died in 1847 from dysentery.
* John Glasgow (aged 40), their nephew, a vagrant who could not read.
** This nephew is not John Glasgow, whose 1850 marriage names Henry Glasgow as his father and conflicts with the census nephew's reported 1839 marriage.
* Ann Glasgow (1833-) (aged 18) and Mary Ann or Maryan Glasgow (aged 17; no compatible WikiTree profile identified), their granddaughters, both linen weavers.
* Jane Grimes (aged 5) and James Grimes (aged 9 months), their grandchildren

Also present were:

* Sarah Alexander (aged 34), a visitor, likely a relative of Rose.
* Barbera McKillop (aged 10), a servant winding quills.
* William Alexander (aged 60), Rose's brother, who had died in 1846 from rheumatism.

:
{| border="0" cellpadding="4"
|1851 Census Data - Head, Wife, Sons, Daughters
|}
{| border="1" cellpadding="4" width="100%"
|- bgcolor=#E1F0B4
| Surname || Forename || Relation || Age (Years) || Age (Months) || Occupation || Education || Birth Place || Cause of Death || Year of Death
|-
| Glasgow || John || Head Of Family || 100 || - || Farmer || Read || Antrim || - || -
|-
| Glasgow || Rose || Wife || 80 || - || None || Read || Antrim || - || -
|-
| Glasgow || Andrew || Son || 30 || - || Linen Weaver || - || - || Consumption || 1848
|-
| Glasgow || Ellen || Daughter || 26 || - || Linen Weaver || Read & Write || Antrim || - || -
|-
| Glasgow || Nancy || Daughter || 36 || - || None || - || - || Dysentery || 1847
|}
:
{| border="0" cellpadding="4"
|1851 Census Data - Grandchildren / Nephew / Nieces
|}
{| border="1" cellpadding="4" width="100%"
|- bgcolor=#E1F0B4
| Surname || Forename || Relation || Age (Years) || Age (Months) || Occupation || Education || Birth Place || Cause of Death || Year of Death
|-
| Glasgow || John || Nephew || 40 || - || Vagrant || Cannot Read || Antrim || - || -
|-
| Glasgow || Ann || Grand Daughter || 18 || - || Linen Weaver || Read & Write || Antrim || - || -
|-
| Glasgow || Maryan || Grand Daughter || 17 || - || Linen Weaver || Read || Antrim || - || -
|-
| Grimes || Jane || Grand Daughter || 5 || - || None || Cannot Read || Antrim || - || -
|-
| Grimes || James || Grand Son || - || 9 || None || Cannot Read || Antrim || - || -
|}
:
{| border="0" cellpadding="4"
|1851 Census Data - Non-Glasgow Family Members
|}
{| border="1" cellpadding="4" width="100%"
|- bgcolor=#E1F0B4
| Surname || Forename || Relation || Age (Years) || Age (Months) || Occupation || Education || Birth Place || Cause of Death || Year of Death
|-
| Alexander || Sarah || Visitor || 34 || - || None || Read || Antrim || - || -
|-
| McKillop || Barbera || Servant || 10 || - || Winding Quills || Cannot Read || Antrim || - || -
|-
| Alexander || Wm || Brother In Law || 60 || - || Labourer || - || - || Rheumatism || 1846
|}

Observations:

* The presence of William Alexander (Brother-in-Law) and Sarah Alexander (Visitor) suggests that Rose's maiden name was Alexander.
* The ages of Rose and her children imply that she may have been beyond typical childbearing age when they were born, indicating:
* Rose may have been John Glasgow's second wife.
* From the 1851 Census, John appeared to be having children from at least ages 64-74
** 35 years prior where he could've been having children. 
** He would've been 28 when he had Robert Glasgow (abt.1779-) if it is his son. 
* There may be inaccuracies in the recorded ages.
* The grandchildren's parentage is uncertain:
* Ann and Maryan are unlikely to be Andrew's children due to his young age at their births.
* The Grimes grandchildren are born too late to be Nancy's children and too early to be Ellens. Unknown Grimes (abt.1815-)
Speculation and Context
John Glasgow's advanced age and the ages of his children raise questions about the accuracy of the records and the relationships within the household:

* Rose's Age and Maternity: If Rose was 80 in 1851, she would have been approximately 44 when Nancy was born, 50 when Andrew was born, and 54 when Ellen was born. These ages are beyond typical childbearing years for the era, suggesting Rose may not be the biological mother of these children.
* It's possible Rose was John's second wife, and the children are from an earlier marriage.
* Alternatively, there may be inaccuracies in the recorded ages.

Grandchildren's Parentage:
* Ann (18) and Maryan (17) are too old to be Andrew's children, as he would have been 12 and 13 at their births. They may be daughters of another, unlisted child of John.
* Jane Grimes (5) could be Nancy's child, given Nancy died in 1847, but James Grimes (9 months) was born after Nancy's death, suggesting another mother.

* Nephew John Glasgow (40): His presence suggests that John (the head) had a brother whose son is this nephew, indicating a wider family network in the area.
** Potentially Henry Glasgow (bef.1790-) who had a son John (1812) in Ireland (County Tyrone) 
Y-DNA Connections
John Glasgow is potentially a descendant of Hugh Glasgow (abt.1706-), through his son John Glasgow (abt.1735-abt.1785), who settled in Tyrone, or his brother Robert Glasgow (abt.1737-abt.1787) of the Melanchthon branch.

Y-DNA analysis indicates:
* A 5-step genetic distance (suggesting a Most Recent Common Ancestor [MRCA] around 1650) between descendants of this branch and the Melanchthon branch.
* A 3-step genetic distance (MRCA around 1750) from Robert Glasgow (abt.1780-abt.1860), who settled in South Carolina.
Potential Ancestry
John Glasgow lists his birthplace as Antrim, reinforcing his roots in the region. This supports the possibility that he is descended from:

* William Glasgow (abt.1708-abt.1783), who was a descendant of James Glasgow (abt.1650-1726), an early migrant to Antrim around 1660.
* Similar to John Glasgow (abt.1775-) who was the son of James Glasgow, He was the father of William Glasgow (1811) and John Glasgow Jr (1814) in County Tyrone He was described in the History of Hillsdale County, Michigan.
* John Glasgow (abt.1815-1896) in Gortin, Derryloran, County Tyrone descended from John Glasgow (bef.1771-) in County Tyrone, Ireland. 
* John Glasgow (bef.1788-) in Killycurragh, Derryloran, County Tyrone, Ireland

This profile is similar to: 

* John Glasgow (bef.1750-), born in Midlothian, Scotland.
** Born in Mid Calder, Midlothian, Scotland, whereas this John lists his native county as Antrim. 
* John Glasgow (1740-), son of James Glasgow, recorded in the 1766 Religious Census for the Parish of Derryloran, County Tyrone, Ireland.
** Too old to be this John
* John Glasgow (bef.1747-) "m. Rose Allan in 1769. Born perhaps 1745-48? Probably not the same as John2 who was a ship’s captain in 1739"
** Could Rose Allan be a misinterpretation of Rose Alex? 
*** Father is listed as John Glasgow (bef.1730-) as born before 1739 based on the record of his sons birth to Margaret Anderson in West Calder, Midlothian. 
Research Notes1831 Census1831 Census
Note: These Glasgow's may be a seperate Londonderry branch, descended from John Glasgow (abt.1735-abt.1785) and/or Robert Glasgow (abt.1737-abt.1787). John is listed as having no females in his family, Ellen and Nancy should've appeared here if this is the same John who appears on the 1851 Census. 

John Glasgow first appears in historical records in the 1831 Irish Census, residing in Lissane, Loughinshollin, Londonderry. His household included nine individuals, 3 of which were males. Alongside him, Robert Glasgow is also listed, with a household of three males, suggesting a possible familial connection. 1831 Irish Census (http://www.census.nationalarchives.ie/search/results.jsp?searchMoreVisible=false&census_year=1831&surname=Glasgow&firstname=&county19011911=&county1821=&county1831=&county1841=&county1851=&parish=&ward=&barony=&townland=&houseNumber=&ded=&age=&sex=&search=Search&exact=1&ageInMonths=&relationToHead=&religion=&education=&occupation=&marriageStatus=&yearsMarried=&birthplace=&nativeCountry=&language=&deafdumb=&causeOfDeath=&yearOfDeath=&familiesNumber=&malesNumber=&femalesNumber=&maleServNumber=&femaleServNumber=&estChurchNumber=&romanCatNumber=&presbNumber=&protNumber=&marriageYears=&childrenBorn=&childrenLiving=) 

{| border="0" cellpadding="4"
|1831 Census Data
|}
{| border="1" cellpadding="4" width="100%"
|- bgcolor=#E1F0B4
| Surname || Forename || Townland/Street || House Number || Barony || Parish || County || Number of families in each || Number of males in family || Number of females in family || Number in Established Church || Number of Roman Catholics || Number of Presbyterians
|-
| Glasgow || John || Dromain || 2 || Loughinshollin || Lissane || Londonderry || 1 || 3 || - || 2 || 2 || 3
|-
| Glasgow || Robt || Coltrim || 2 || Loughinshollin || Lissane || Londonderry || 1 || 6 || 5 || - || - || 11
|}

* John Glasgow (1780-1840) was born in Londonderry but had already emigrated to America by 1796.
** Hugh Glasgow (1739-abt.1831) the father of the aforementioned John and brother of John Glasgow (abt.1735-abt.1785), was also born in Londonderry. 
** His father Hugh Glasgow (abt.1706-) was born in County Tyrone
Potential for Further Research
* Marriage Records: Locating John and Rose's marriage record could clarify Rose's age and their marriage date.
* Baptismal Records: Could confirm the children's parentage and correct ages.
* Death Records: May provide additional details about family relationships.
* Y-DNA Analysis: Continued genetic research could confirm connections to the Melanchthon branch.
Current researchOther possible children
John Glasgow and Samuel Glasgow of Lisnagaver
were brothers. The younger John's 1846 marriage names his father as John
Glasgow, farmer, and the 1851 census explicitly calls Samuel his
brother. IrishGenealogy.ie (https://www.irishgenealogy.ie/view/?record_id=cima-3156063), civil marriage of John Glasgow and Margaret Garvin, 16 November 1846. 1851 Census of Ireland (https://www.census.nationalarchives.ie/pages/1851/Antrim/Kilconway/Rasharkin/Lisnagaver/34/), Lisnagaver household 34. 

The younger John's family gravestone says that he died in 1895 aged seventy-
eight, implying birth about 1816 or 1817, although the 1851 return reported him
as fifty. Pauline O'Keeffe and Helen Evans, Rasharkin Second Presbyterian Church headstones (https://genealogy.torrens.org/BannValley/church/RasharkinP/graveyard.html), transcription made August 2004, Glasgo memorial erected by James Garvin Glasgo. If the gravestone age is correct, this John would have been about sixty-five when the younger John was born. He remains a possible identity for the named father, but the shared name and occupation do not identify him uniquely. Both relationships remain uncertain.

George Glasgow, whose wife Sarah was also an Alexander, headed
the immediately preceding Glenleslie household. His location, age and Alexander
association make him a plausible son, but no record calls him John's son. 

John Glasgow, a farmer at Cross in Ballyclug, married Rachel
Grey in 1865. The original certificate calls him a bachelor and names his father
as John Glasgow, farmer. General Register Office of Ireland, civil marriage register (https://www.irishgenealogy.ie/files/civil/marriage_returns/marriages_1865/11578/8260226.pdf), John Glasgow and Rachel Grey, 11 September 1865. His 1874 death age implies birth about 1809. General Register Office of Ireland, civil death register (https://civilrecords.irishgenealogy.ie/churchrecords/images/deaths_returns/deaths_1874/020673/7253774.pdf), John Glasgow, Cross, 27 January 1874. He is another possible son of a local John farmer. He is not the 1851 nephew, who was recorded as married since 1839. John Glasgow of Cross, who died in 1836, is a competing and geographically closer father candidate, so no attachment to this John is justified yet.
Unresolved grandchildren and nephew
Ann and Mary Ann Glasgow retained the Glasgow surname, but their father or
mother has not been identified. Jane and James Grimes imply that another child
of John had formed a Grimes family. No compatible civil marriage was found for
Jane Grimes in the Ballymena district after 1860.

The forty-year-old nephew is especially important because his father should
identify a brother or brother-equivalent of John. John Glasgow
was considered, but his 1850 marriage names his father as Henry Glasgow, farmer,
and no record makes that Henry John's brother. General Register Office of Ireland, civil marriage register (https://www.irishgenealogy.ie/files/civil/marriage_returns/marriages_1850/09386/5399841.pdf), John Glasgow and Matilda Little, 1850. 
Parentage and local cluster
No inspected record identifies John's parents. Robert Glasgow
was previously attached as his father, but the reviewed Kilwaughter church and
petition material never names John as Robert's son. The relationship is a tree
reconstruction rather than a documented fact.

William Glasgow of Larne is currently retained as John's
uncertain father. Their ages are compatible, but no baptism, will, deed or
church entry names John as William's son, and no record bridges William's Larne
property to John's later Glenleslie household.

Robert Glasgow headed Glenleslie household 23. He was born
about 1779, twelve years before John and Rose's reported marriage, and the census
does not call him John's son. He was therefore removed from this family and his
parents were left blank. 1851 Census of Ireland (https://www.census.nationalarchives.ie/pages/1851/Antrim/Kilconway/Dunaghy/Glenleslie/23/), Glenleslie household 23. 

The older Ballyboggy records provide a competing local ancestry. The 1740
Protestant Householders' Return records Joh Glask in Dunaghy, and a
three-life lease identifies John Glasgow and James Wier as
joint Ballyboggy tenants. Bill MacAfee, Protestant Householders' Returns, 1740 (https://www.billmacafee.com/1740returns/1740religiousreturnsulstername.pdf), record 2107, Joh Glask, Dunaghy. Public Record Office of Northern Ireland, D2223/15/56, Ballyboggy title-deed bundle, lease of 1740; PRONI eCatalogue (https://apps.proni.gov.uk/eCatNI_IE/SearchPage.aspx). He was an adult before this John was born and is therefore a plausible father, grandfather or collateral relative. The lease description does not name his children.

James Glasgow and James Glasgow junior were among the Ballyboggy tithe
occupiers in 1825. Ballyboggy adjoins Glenleslie, and the same records repeatedly
contain Alexander and Wier households. Bill MacAfee, North Antrim Tithe Applotment Books arranged in document order (https://www.billmacafee.com/182030stithe/tithenorthantrimrevisionorder.pdf), Dunaghy parish, Ballyboggy, 1825. This is evidence for a long-running local tenant network, not a parent-child chain.
Y-DNA
A direct paternal descendant of Alexander Glasgow of Lisnagaver
and the tested line of James J Glasgow share the confirmed
R-FT20271 branch and are genetic distance three at Y-111. The result supports a
shared male Glasgow ancestor, probably several generations earlier, but it does
not identify John as that ancestor or distinguish whether the Glenleslie and
Lisnagaver household heads were brothers, cousins or more distant relatives. FamilyTreeDNA Glasgow Surname Project, public Y-DNA results (https://www.familytreedna.com/public/Glasgow?iframe=ydna-results-overview), kits B580327 and 1002232. 
Additional searches
The National Archives 1831 surname search (http://www.census.nationalarchives.ie/search/results.jsp?searchMoreVisible=false&census_year=1831&surname=Glasgow&firstname=&county19011911=&county1821=&county1831=&county1841=&county1851=&parish=&ward=&barony=&townland=&houseNumber=&ded=&age=&sex=&search=Search&exact=1&ageInMonths=&relationToHead=&religion=&education=&occupation=&marriageStatus=&yearsMarried=&birthplace=&nativeCountry=&language=&deafdumb=&causeOfDeath=&yearOfDeath=&familiesNumber=&malesNumber=&femalesNumber=&maleServNumber=&femaleServNumber=&estChurchNumber=&romanCatNumber=&presbNumber=&protNumber=&marriageYears=&childrenBorn=&childrenLiving=) and the derivative FamilySearch tree (https://www.familysearch.org/tree/person/details/MM3D-24G) are retained as research leads; neither identifies John's parents.
See Also
link title (http://www.example.com)
* Chronology of the Glasgow Family in Northern Ireland in Historical Context (https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Space:Chronology_of_the_Glasgow_Family_in_Northern_Ireland_in_Historical_Context)
* FamilySearch Record for John Glasgow (possible mother-in-law Jeane Cunninghame) (https://www.familysearch.org/tree/person/details/MM3D-24G)
Sources
Raw WikiTree biography markup
== Biography ==

[[Category:Glasgow Name Study]]
{{Estimated Date}}

An earlier working hypothesis proposed [[Glasgow-1143|Robert Glasgow (abt.1710-abt.1772)]] as John's father based on Y-DNA, naming patterns, locations and ages. See [[Space:Hypothesis:_Parentage_of_John_Glasgow-1022|Hypothesis: Parentage of John Glasgow-1022]]. No reviewed record proves this relationship.

A second working hypothesis considered [[Glasgow-2425|Robert Glasgow (abt.1724-)]] because of the name Robert and the branch's Y-DNA proximity to [[Glasgow-951|Alexander Glasgow]]. This is also unproved.
=== Residency and Family Life in Ireland ===



==== 1851 Census ====

By the time of the '''1851 Antrim Census''', John Glasgow is recorded as being '''100 years old''', suggesting a birth year around '''1751'''. He was married to '''Rose Alexander''', aged '''80''', and they resided in Glenleslie, Dunaghy, Antrim.<ref name="Glenleslie1851Detailed">[https://durrushistory.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/1851irishcensusreturnscommadelimitedtextfilejul24_071.pdf ''1851 Irish Census Returns: detailed comma-delimited transcription''], Glenleslie household 21.</ref><ref name="Glenleslie1851Macafee">[https://www.billmacafee.com/census/1851censuskilconway.pdf Bill MacAfee, ''1851 Census, Barony of Kilconway''], Glenleslie household 21.</ref> Living with them were:

* '''[[Glasgow-1050|Andrew Glasgow (1818-1848)]]''' (aged 30), their son, a linen weaver who had died in 1848 from consumption.
* '''[[Glasgow-1368|Ellen Glasgow (abt.1825-)]]''' (aged 26), their daughter, a linen weaver who could read and write.
* '''[[Glasgow-1369|Nancy Glasgow (abt.1815-abt.1847)]]''' (aged 36), their daughter who had died in 1847 from dysentery.
* '''John Glasgow''' (aged 40), their nephew, a vagrant who could not read.
** This nephew is not [[Glasgow-2056|John Glasgow]], whose 1850 marriage names Henry Glasgow as his father and conflicts with the census nephew's reported 1839 marriage.
* '''[[Glasgow-3168|Ann Glasgow (1833-)]]''' (aged 18) and '''Mary Ann or Maryan Glasgow''' (aged 17; no compatible WikiTree profile identified), their granddaughters, both linen weavers.
* '''Jane Grimes''' (aged 5) and '''James Grimes''' (aged 9 months), their grandchildren

Also present were:

* '''Sarah Alexander''' (aged 34), a visitor, likely a relative of Rose.
* '''Barbera McKillop''' (aged 10), a servant winding quills.
* '''William Alexander''' (aged 60), Rose's brother, who had died in 1846 from rheumatism.

:
{| border="0" cellpadding="4"
|1851 Census Data - Head, Wife, Sons, Daughters
|}
{| border="1" cellpadding="4"  width="100%"
|- bgcolor=#E1F0B4
| Surname || Forename || Relation || Age (Years) || Age (Months) || Occupation || Education || Birth Place || Cause of Death || Year of Death
|-
| Glasgow || John || Head Of Family || 100 || - || Farmer || Read || Antrim || - || -
|-
| Glasgow || Rose || Wife || 80 || - || None || Read || Antrim || - || -
|-
| Glasgow || Andrew || Son || 30 || - || Linen Weaver || - || - || Consumption || 1848
|-
| Glasgow || Ellen || Daughter || 26 || - || Linen Weaver || Read & Write || Antrim || - || -
|-
| Glasgow || Nancy || Daughter || 36 || - || None || - || - || Dysentery || 1847
|}
:
{| border="0" cellpadding="4"
|1851 Census Data - Grandchildren / Nephew / Nieces
|}
{| border="1" cellpadding="4"  width="100%"
|- bgcolor=#E1F0B4
| Surname || Forename || Relation || Age (Years) || Age (Months) || Occupation || Education || Birth Place || Cause of Death || Year of Death
|-
| Glasgow || John || Nephew || 40 || - || Vagrant || Cannot Read || Antrim || - || -
|-
| Glasgow || Ann || Grand Daughter || 18 || - || Linen Weaver || Read & Write || Antrim || - || -
|-
| Glasgow || Maryan || Grand Daughter || 17 || - || Linen Weaver || Read || Antrim || - || -
|-
| Grimes || Jane || Grand Daughter || 5 || - || None || Cannot Read || Antrim || - || -
|-
| Grimes || James || Grand Son || - || 9 || None || Cannot Read || Antrim || - || -
|}
:
{| border="0" cellpadding="4"
|1851 Census Data - Non-Glasgow Family Members
|}
{| border="1" cellpadding="4"  width="100%"
|- bgcolor=#E1F0B4
| Surname || Forename || Relation || Age (Years) || Age (Months) || Occupation || Education || Birth Place || Cause of Death || Year of Death
|-
| Alexander || Sarah || Visitor || 34 || - || None || Read || Antrim || - || -
|-
| McKillop || Barbera || Servant || 10 || - || Winding Quills || Cannot Read || Antrim || - || -
|-
| Alexander || Wm || Brother In Law || 60 || - || Labourer || - || - || Rheumatism || 1846
|}


'''Observations:'''


* The presence of '''William Alexander''' (Brother-in-Law) and '''Sarah Alexander''' (Visitor) suggests that Rose's maiden name was '''Alexander'''.
* The ages of Rose and her children imply that she may have been beyond typical childbearing age when they were born, indicating:
* Rose may have been '''John Glasgow's second wife'''.
* From the 1851 Census, John appeared to be having children from at least ages 64-74
** 35 years prior where he could've been having children. 
** He would've been 28 when he had [[Glasgow-1367|Robert Glasgow (abt.1779-)]] if it is his son. 
* There may be inaccuracies in the recorded ages.
* The grandchildren's parentage is uncertain:
*  '''Ann''' and '''Maryan''' are unlikely to be Andrew's children due to his young age at their births.
*  The Grimes grandchildren are born too late to be Nancy's children and too early to be Ellens. [[Grimes-6878|Unknown Grimes (abt.1815-)]]


=== Speculation and Context ===

John Glasgow's advanced age and the ages of his children raise questions about the accuracy of the records and the relationships within the household:

* '''Rose's Age and Maternity''': If Rose was 80 in 1851, she would have been approximately 44 when Nancy was born, 50 when Andrew was born, and 54 when Ellen was born. These ages are beyond typical childbearing years for the era, suggesting Rose may not be the biological mother of these children.
*  It's possible Rose was '''John's second wife''', and the children are from an earlier marriage.
* Alternatively, there may be inaccuracies in the recorded ages.

'''Grandchildren's Parentage''':
*  '''Ann (18)''' and '''Maryan (17)''' are too old to be Andrew's children, as he would have been 12 and 13 at their births. They may be daughters of another, unlisted child of John.
*  '''Jane Grimes (5)''' could be Nancy's child, given Nancy died in 1847, but '''James Grimes (9 months)''' was born after Nancy's death, suggesting another mother.

* '''Nephew John Glasgow (40)''': His presence suggests that John (the head) had a brother whose son is this nephew, indicating a wider family network in the area.
** Potentially [[Glasgow-3135|Henry Glasgow (bef.1790-)]] who had a son John (1812) in Ireland (County Tyrone) 

== Y-DNA Connections ==

John Glasgow is potentially a descendant of [[Glasgow-548|Hugh Glasgow (abt.1706-)]], through his son [[Glasgow-549|John Glasgow (abt.1735-abt.1785)]], who settled in Tyrone, or his brother [[Glasgow-550|Robert Glasgow (abt.1737-abt.1787)]] of the Melanchthon branch.

Y-DNA analysis indicates:
* A 5-step genetic distance (suggesting a Most Recent Common Ancestor [MRCA] around 1650) between descendants of this branch and the Melanchthon branch.
* A 3-step genetic distance (MRCA around 1750) from [[Glasgow-2769|Robert Glasgow (abt.1780-abt.1860)]], who settled in South Carolina.

=== Potential Ancestry ===

John Glasgow lists his birthplace as '''Antrim''', reinforcing his roots in the region. This supports the possibility that he is descended from:

* '''[[Glasgow-1505|William Glasgow (abt.1708-abt.1783)]]''', who was a descendant of '''[[Glasgow-1081|James Glasgow (abt.1650-1726)]]''', an early migrant to Antrim around 1660.
* Similar to [[Glasgow-1968|John Glasgow (abt.1775-)]] who was the son of James Glasgow, He was the father of William Glasgow (1811) and John Glasgow Jr (1814) in County Tyrone He was described in the History of Hillsdale County, Michigan.
* [[Glasgow-2537|John Glasgow (abt.1815-1896)]] in Gortin, Derryloran, County Tyrone descended from [[Glasgow-2539|John Glasgow (bef.1771-)]] in County Tyrone, Ireland. 
* [[Glasgow-2058|John Glasgow (bef.1788-)]] in Killycurragh, Derryloran, County Tyrone, Ireland

This profile is similar to: 

* [[Glasgow-2980|John Glasgow (bef.1750-)]], born in Midlothian, Scotland.
** Born in Mid Calder, Midlothian, Scotland, whereas this John lists his native county as Antrim. 
* [[Glasgow-2990|John Glasgow (1740-)]], son of James Glasgow, recorded in the 1766 Religious Census for the Parish of Derryloran, County Tyrone, Ireland.
** Too old to be this John
* [[Glasgow-2846|John Glasgow (bef.1747-)]] "m. Rose Allan in 1769. Born perhaps 1745-48? Probably not the same as John2 who was a ship’s captain in 1739"
** Could Rose Allan be a misinterpretation of Rose Alex? 
*** Father is listed as [[Glasgow-2847|John Glasgow (bef.1730-)]] as born before 1739 based on the record of his sons birth to  Margaret Anderson in West Calder, Midlothian. 
== Research Notes ==

=== 1831 Census ===


==== 1831 Census ====

Note: These Glasgow's may be a seperate Londonderry branch, descended from [[Glasgow-549|John Glasgow (abt.1735-abt.1785)]] and/or [[Glasgow-550|Robert Glasgow (abt.1737-abt.1787)]]. John is listed as having no females in his family, Ellen and Nancy should've appeared here if this is the same John who appears on the 1851 Census. 

John Glasgow first appears in historical records in the '''1831 Irish Census''', residing in Lissane, Loughinshollin, Londonderry. His household included nine individuals, 3 of which were males. Alongside him, '''Robert Glasgow''' is also listed, with a household of three males, suggesting a possible familial connection.<ref>[http://www.census.nationalarchives.ie/search/results.jsp?searchMoreVisible=false&census_year=1831&surname=Glasgow&firstname=&county19011911=&county1821=&county1831=&county1841=&county1851=&parish=&ward=&barony=&townland=&houseNumber=&ded=&age=&sex=&search=Search&exact=1&ageInMonths=&relationToHead=&religion=&education=&occupation=&marriageStatus=&yearsMarried=&birthplace=&nativeCountry=&language=&deafdumb=&causeOfDeath=&yearOfDeath=&familiesNumber=&malesNumber=&femalesNumber=&maleServNumber=&femaleServNumber=&estChurchNumber=&romanCatNumber=&presbNumber=&protNumber=&marriageYears=&childrenBorn=&childrenLiving= 1831 Irish Census]</ref>

{| border="0" cellpadding="4"
|1831 Census Data
|}
{| border="1" cellpadding="4"  width="100%"
|- bgcolor=#E1F0B4
| Surname || Forename || Townland/Street || House Number || Barony || Parish || County || Number of families in each || Number of males in family || Number of females in family || Number in Established Church || Number of Roman Catholics || Number of Presbyterians
|-
| Glasgow || John || Dromain || 2 || Loughinshollin || Lissane || Londonderry || 1 || 3 || - || 2 || 2 || 3
|-
| Glasgow || Robt || Coltrim || 2 || Loughinshollin || Lissane || Londonderry || 1 || 6 || 5 || - || - || 11
|}

* [[Glasgow-209|John Glasgow (1780-1840)]] was born in Londonderry but had already emigrated to America by 1796.
** [[Glasgow-540|Hugh Glasgow (1739-abt.1831)]] the father of the aforementioned John and brother of [[Glasgow-549|John Glasgow (abt.1735-abt.1785)]], was also born in Londonderry. 
** His father [[Glasgow-548|Hugh Glasgow (abt.1706-)]] was born in County Tyrone

=== Potential for Further Research ===

* '''Marriage Records''': Locating John and Rose's marriage record could clarify Rose's age and their marriage date.
* '''Baptismal Records''': Could confirm the children's parentage and correct ages.
* '''Death Records''': May provide additional details about family relationships.
* '''Y-DNA Analysis''': Continued genetic research could confirm connections to the Melanchthon branch.


=== Current research ===

==== Other possible children ====

[[Glasgow-867|John Glasgow]] and [[Glasgow-2908|Samuel Glasgow]] of Lisnagaver
were brothers. The younger John's 1846 marriage names his father as '''John
Glasgow, farmer''', and the 1851 census explicitly calls Samuel his
brother.<ref name="JohnMarriage1846">[https://www.irishgenealogy.ie/view/?record_id=cima-3156063 IrishGenealogy.ie], civil marriage of John Glasgow and Margaret Garvin, 16 November 1846.</ref><ref name="Lisnagaver1851">[https://www.census.nationalarchives.ie/pages/1851/Antrim/Kilconway/Rasharkin/Lisnagaver/34/ 1851 Census of Ireland], Lisnagaver household 34.</ref>

The younger John's family gravestone says that he died in 1895 aged seventy-
eight, implying birth about 1816 or 1817, although the 1851 return reported him
as fifty.<ref name="RasharkinStone">[https://genealogy.torrens.org/BannValley/church/RasharkinP/graveyard.html Pauline O'Keeffe and Helen Evans, ''Rasharkin Second Presbyterian Church headstones''], transcription made August 2004, Glasgo memorial erected by James Garvin Glasgo.</ref> If the gravestone age is correct, this John would have been about sixty-five when the younger John was born. He remains a possible identity for the named father, but the shared name and occupation do not identify him uniquely. Both relationships remain uncertain.

[[Glasgow-1400|George Glasgow]], whose wife Sarah was also an Alexander, headed
the immediately preceding Glenleslie household. His location, age and Alexander
association make him a plausible son, but no record calls him John's son.<ref name="Glenleslie1851Macafee" />

[[Glasgow-2407|John Glasgow]], a farmer at Cross in Ballyclug, married Rachel
Grey in 1865. The original certificate calls him a bachelor and names his father
as '''John Glasgow, farmer'''.<ref name="CrossMarriage1865">[https://www.irishgenealogy.ie/files/civil/marriage_returns/marriages_1865/11578/8260226.pdf General Register Office of Ireland, civil marriage register], John Glasgow and Rachel Grey, 11 September 1865.</ref> His 1874 death age implies birth about 1809.<ref name="CrossDeath1874">[https://civilrecords.irishgenealogy.ie/churchrecords/images/deaths_returns/deaths_1874/020673/7253774.pdf General Register Office of Ireland, civil death register], John Glasgow, Cross, 27 January 1874.</ref> He is another possible son of a local John farmer. He is not the 1851 nephew, who was recorded as married since 1839. [[Glasgow-1657|John Glasgow of Cross]], who died in 1836, is a competing and geographically closer father candidate, so no attachment to this John is justified yet.

==== Unresolved grandchildren and nephew ====

Ann and Mary Ann Glasgow retained the Glasgow surname, but their father or
mother has not been identified. Jane and James Grimes imply that another child
of John had formed a Grimes family. No compatible civil marriage was found for
Jane Grimes in the Ballymena district after 1860.

The forty-year-old nephew is especially important because his father should
identify a brother or brother-equivalent of John. [[Glasgow-2056|John Glasgow]]
was considered, but his 1850 marriage names his father as Henry Glasgow, farmer,
and no record makes that Henry John's brother.<ref name="John2056Marriage">[https://www.irishgenealogy.ie/files/civil/marriage_returns/marriages_1850/09386/5399841.pdf General Register Office of Ireland, civil marriage register], John Glasgow and Matilda Little, 1850.</ref>

==== Parentage and local cluster ====

No inspected record identifies John's parents. [[Glasgow-1143|Robert Glasgow]]
was previously attached as his father, but the reviewed Kilwaughter church and
petition material never names John as Robert's son. The relationship is a tree
reconstruction rather than a documented fact.

[[Glasgow-1505|William Glasgow of Larne]] is currently retained as John's
uncertain father. Their ages are compatible, but no baptism, will, deed or
church entry names John as William's son, and no record bridges William's Larne
property to John's later Glenleslie household.

[[Glasgow-1367|Robert Glasgow]] headed Glenleslie household 23. He was born
about 1779, twelve years before John and Rose's reported marriage, and the census
does not call him John's son. He was therefore removed from this family and his
parents were left blank.<ref name="Robert1851">[https://www.census.nationalarchives.ie/pages/1851/Antrim/Kilconway/Dunaghy/Glenleslie/23/ 1851 Census of Ireland], Glenleslie household 23.</ref>

The older Ballyboggy records provide a competing local ancestry. The 1740
Protestant Householders' Return records '''Joh Glask''' in Dunaghy, and a
three-life lease identifies [[Glasgow-3959|John Glasgow]] and James Wier as
joint Ballyboggy tenants.<ref name="Householders1740">[https://www.billmacafee.com/1740returns/1740religiousreturnsulstername.pdf Bill MacAfee, ''Protestant Householders' Returns, 1740''], record 2107, Joh Glask, Dunaghy.</ref><ref name="BallyboggyLease1740">Public Record Office of Northern Ireland, D2223/15/56, Ballyboggy title-deed bundle, lease of 1740; [https://apps.proni.gov.uk/eCatNI_IE/SearchPage.aspx PRONI eCatalogue].</ref> He was an adult before this John was born and is therefore a plausible father, grandfather or collateral relative. The lease description does not name his children.

James Glasgow and James Glasgow junior were among the Ballyboggy tithe
occupiers in 1825. Ballyboggy adjoins Glenleslie, and the same records repeatedly
contain Alexander and Wier households.<ref name="Tithe1825">[https://www.billmacafee.com/182030stithe/tithenorthantrimrevisionorder.pdf Bill MacAfee, ''North Antrim Tithe Applotment Books arranged in document order''], Dunaghy parish, Ballyboggy, 1825.</ref> This is evidence for a long-running local tenant network, not a parent-child chain.

==== Y-DNA ====

A direct paternal descendant of [[Glasgow-951|Alexander Glasgow of Lisnagaver]]
and the tested line of [[Glasgow-2738|James J Glasgow]] share the confirmed
R-FT20271 branch and are genetic distance three at Y-111. The result supports a
shared male Glasgow ancestor, probably several generations earlier, but it does
not identify John as that ancestor or distinguish whether the Glenleslie and
Lisnagaver household heads were brothers, cousins or more distant relatives.<ref name="FTDNA">[https://www.familytreedna.com/public/Glasgow?iframe=ydna-results-overview FamilyTreeDNA Glasgow Surname Project, public Y-DNA results], kits B580327 and 1002232.</ref>

==== Additional searches ====

The [http://www.census.nationalarchives.ie/search/results.jsp?searchMoreVisible=false&census_year=1831&surname=Glasgow&firstname=&county19011911=&county1821=&county1831=&county1841=&county1851=&parish=&ward=&barony=&townland=&houseNumber=&ded=&age=&sex=&search=Search&exact=1&ageInMonths=&relationToHead=&religion=&education=&occupation=&marriageStatus=&yearsMarried=&birthplace=&nativeCountry=&language=&deafdumb=&causeOfDeath=&yearOfDeath=&familiesNumber=&malesNumber=&femalesNumber=&maleServNumber=&femaleServNumber=&estChurchNumber=&romanCatNumber=&presbNumber=&protNumber=&marriageYears=&childrenBorn=&childrenLiving= National Archives 1831 surname search] and the derivative [https://www.familysearch.org/tree/person/details/MM3D-24G FamilySearch tree] are retained as research leads; neither identifies John's parents.

== See Also ==
[http://www.example.com link title]
* [https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Space:Chronology_of_the_Glasgow_Family_in_Northern_Ireland_in_Historical_Context Chronology of the Glasgow Family in Northern Ireland in Historical Context]
* [https://www.familysearch.org/tree/person/details/MM3D-24G FamilySearch Record for John Glasgow (possible mother-in-law Jeane Cunninghame)]


== Sources ==


<references />