Individual research record
John Glasgow
c. 1809 – 1874-01-27
Glasgow-2407 · 1 mapped association
At a glance
Identity & family
Tree links organise the family; documentary status still varies.
- Birth
- c. 1809 · County Antrim, Ireland
- Death
- 1874-01-27 · Cross, Ballyclug, County Antrim, Ireland, United Kingdom
- Parents
- Not recorded
- Spouses
- Rachel (Gray) Glasgow
- Children
- James Glasgow
- Gender
- Male
- WikiTree
- Glasgow-2407
- Research clusters
- Unplaced Irish profile leads through 1850
- Mapped descendants
- 5
Comparison context
These child positions and checks are the subject details used to rank possible parents below.
Naming sequence used by the parentage model
Known-position checks: 0 support · 0 conflict. Ordinals retain unnamed children and recognise reused names.
Relationship comparison
Potential parents or duplicates
Compare scored leads with the subject details above—not proof.
Possible fathers5 leads
Possible Father
John GlasgowGlasgow-209
- plausible 29-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- known spouse Peninnah (Thomas) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (31) at the subject's birth (+7)
- 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming
No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required
Show complete scoring
- plausible 29-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 91 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1871), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- mapped Portglenone — regional family-tradition reference is 14.1 km from the subject's birth-period Ballyclug civil parish — County Antrim (+2; one or both placements are unproved)
- subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1807–1821) (+6; other parent Peninnah (Thomas) Glasgow)
- known spouse Peninnah (Thomas) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (31) at the subject's birth (+7)
- candidate and subject share the given name John (+4; weak direct parent-child name recurrence, 278 public profiles)
- 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming
Deductions and cautions: No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required
Possible Father
Wilson Crossier GlasgowGlasgow-1982
- plausible 37-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming
- candidate's birth is 99 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1871), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
descendant-name recurrence has no independent household, record, migration or specific-locality anchor (score capped at 39)
Show complete scoring
- plausible 37-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 99 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1871), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- mapped Kilwaughter is 23.4 km from the subject's birth-period Ballyclug civil parish — County Antrim (+1; one or both placements are unproved)
- subject's birth fits within the candidate's overall child-bearing span (1800–1810) (+3; children are not tied to one spouse)
- known spouse Mary (McCracken) Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (32) at the subject's birth (+3)
- candidate's sibling and niece/nephew network repeats names in the subject's descendant line (three rarest at most): Rachel +10 (25 public profiles; niece/nephew Rachel Keller Glasgow, sibling Rachel McCrackin; +2 repetition bonus) (+10 total)
- 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming
Deductions and cautions: descendant-name recurrence has no independent household, record, migration or specific-locality anchor (score capped at 39)
Show 3 lower-scoring possible fathers
Possible Father
Older Alexander GlasgowGlasgow-3904
- 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): collateral network, household chronology, locality
- candidate's birth is 93 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1871), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- known spouse Rosanna Unknown had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (31) at the subject's birth (+3)
No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required
Show complete scoring
- bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at least 31 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
- candidate's birth is 93 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1871), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- mapped Killoquin electoral division is 18.9 km from the subject's birth-period Ballyclug civil parish — County Antrim (+1; one or both placements are unproved)
- subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1796–1815) (+6; other parent Rosanna Unknown)
- known spouse Rosanna Unknown had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (31) at the subject's birth (+3)
- shared recorded occupation: farmer (+3; weak household-continuity clue)
- uncommon spouse surnames recur across the subject and candidate branches: Boyd +6 (+6 total)
- 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): collateral network, household chronology, locality
Deductions and cautions: No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required
Possible Father
John GlasgowGlasgow-822
- plausible 42-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- known spouse Mary Arthur had a plausible maternal age (35) at the subject's birth (+7)
- 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming
candidate already has another child named John Glasgow (Glasgow-1617) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict)
Show complete scoring
- plausible 42-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 104 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1871), a marginal two-generation interval (+1)
- mapped Inishrush is 18.3 km from the subject's birth-period Ballyclug civil parish — County Antrim (+1; one or both placements are unproved)
- subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1799–1815) (+6; other parent Mary Arthur)
- known spouse Mary Arthur had a plausible maternal age (35) at the subject's birth (+7)
- candidate and subject share the given name John (+4; weak direct parent-child name recurrence, 278 public profiles)
- 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming
Deductions and cautions: candidate already has another child named John Glasgow (Glasgow-1617) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict)
Possible Father
John GlasgowGlasgow-1657
- plausible 43-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming
- known spouse Jane (McClure) Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (36) at the subject's birth (+3)
No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required
Show complete scoring
- plausible 43-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 105 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1871), a marginal two-generation interval (+1)
- mapped Cross townland, Ballymoney parish is 28.8 km from the subject's birth-period Ballyclug civil parish — County Antrim (+1; one or both placements are unproved)
- subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1799–1815) (+6; other parent Jane (McClure) Glasgow)
- known spouse Jane (McClure) Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (36) at the subject's birth (+3)
- candidate and subject share the given name John (+4; weak direct parent-child name recurrence, 278 public profiles)
- 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming
Deductions and cautions: No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required
Possible mothers5 leads
Possible Mother
Rosanna UnknownUnknown-761034
- 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): collateral network, household chronology, locality
- candidate's birth is 93 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1871), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at least 31 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required
Show complete scoring
- bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at least 31 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
- candidate's birth is 93 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1871), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- mapped Killoquin electoral division is 18.9 km from the subject's birth-period Ballyclug civil parish — County Antrim (+1; one or both placements are unproved)
- subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1796–1815) (+6; other parent Older Alexander Glasgow)
- uncommon spouse surnames recur across the subject and candidate branches: Boyd +6 (+6 total)
- 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): collateral network, household chronology, locality
Deductions and cautions: No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required
Possible Mother
Euphemia GlasgowGlasgow-506
- 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming
- candidate's birth is 91 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1871), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at least 29 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required
Show complete scoring
- bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at least 29 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
- candidate's birth is 91 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1871), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- mapped Kells, County Antrim is 6.0 km from the subject's birth-period Ballyclug civil parish — County Antrim (+2; one or both placements are unproved)
- a candidate spouse matches the first dated son James Glasgow, the expected father position (+3; James in 224 profiles)
- 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming
Deductions and cautions: No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required
Show 3 lower-scoring possible mothers
Possible Mother
Ann GlasgowGlasgow-3992
- possible 41-year parent-child age gap (+10)
- candidate's birth is 103 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1871), a marginal two-generation interval (+1)
- weak broad-area overlap: antrim (+1; not a locality match)
No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required
Show complete scoring
- possible 41-year parent-child age gap (+10)
- candidate's birth is 103 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1871), a marginal two-generation interval (+1)
- weak broad-area overlap: antrim (+1; not a locality match)
- candidate's parents' names recur among the subject's grandchildren: Jane +1 (+1 total; weak multigeneration clue)
Deductions and cautions: No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required
Possible Mother
Betsy A (Sleator) GlasgowSleator-46
- the nominal 14-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (15–24 years) (+4)
- candidate's birth is 76 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1871), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- weak broad-area overlap: antrim (+1; not a locality match)
parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction)
Show complete scoring
- the nominal 14-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (15–24 years) (+4)
- candidate's birth is 76 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1871), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- weak broad-area overlap: antrim (+1; not a locality match)
- a candidate spouse matches the first dated son James Glasgow, the expected father position (+3; James in 224 profiles)
Deductions and cautions: parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction)
Possible Mother
Rhoda Neely (Montgomery) GlasgowMontgomery-6593
- plausible 30-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 92 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1871), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1803–1822) (+6; other parent William Glasgow)
candidate is recorded only outside the subject's birth country (−25)
Show complete scoring
- plausible 30-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 92 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1871), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1803–1822) (+6; other parent William Glasgow)
- uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Rachel +8 (25 public profiles; subject branch: Rachel Glasgow; candidate branch: Rachel Ramsey (Glasgow) Graham) (+8 total)
Deductions and cautions: candidate is recorded only outside the subject's birth country (−25)
How parent leads are calculated
Automated leads use birth surnames—not married surnames—as parental eligibility, role-specific biological age limits, bounded and approximate-date uncertainty, household chronology, specific time-aware localities, mapped distance, tenancy succession, migration destinations and sex-aware Scottish naming positions across generations. People already attached as the subject's parents stay in the identity summary and are excluded from this alternative-candidate list, regardless of relationship confidence. The main calibration uses clues available on disconnected profiles; existing parent and sibling links are retained as comparison context rather than treated as transferable evidence. Common ordered names and grandparent-to-child echoes receive a small non-zero weight, so a John or James match can support several independent criteria without producing a lead alone. Rare names, repeated bearers and bundles across otherwise distinct branches receive substantially more weight according to catalogue frequency. An exact migration place is weighted by its rarity and repetition across both branches; a shared destination country is worth only one point. Extra weight is added only when at least three independent clue types converge: naming, locality, specific migration, household chronology or collateral networks. Sparse profiles retain a clearly labelled chronology-only fallback instead of disappearing. Countries, states, counties and research clusters do not count as a shared locality, and fallback, broad representative or kin-inferred coordinates are excluded from distance scoring. Shared descendant profiles are removed before branch-name comparison. A candidate already recorded as a parent-in-law is excluded. A confident or independently supported parent is treated as settled; uncertain and unassessed attachments remain open to alternative comparison. A different linked parent, an uncle/aunt or grandparent path, and a matching existing child profile prevent an alternative from being classified as a strong direct-parent lead until the underlying tree conflict or duplicate is resolved. Familiar forms such as Bessie are normalised. Surname remains an eligibility filter worth zero points.
Naming customs, shared farms and occupations are circumstantial. Children, spouses and collateral relatives may be missing, and tree-derived family networks are not independent evidence. Scores rank research leads; they do not prove parentage.
Same-name candidate
John GlasgowGlasgow-3463
- same first and last name (+18)
- birth years within 1 (+25)
- matching child name: James Glasgow
No indexed conflict
Full comparison detail
- same first and last name (+18)
- birth years within 1 (+25)
- matching child name: James Glasgow
Conflicts: No indexed conflict
Same-name candidate
John GlasgowGlasgow-1355
- same first and last name (+18)
- birth years within 2 (+25)
No indexed conflict
Full comparison detail
- same first and last name (+18)
- birth years within 2 (+25)
Conflicts: No indexed conflict
How duplicate leads are calculated
Dates are eligibility gates, not merely deductions: chronologically impossible people are excluded. Dates, places, spouses, parent certainty and children's profiles and names are then compared. A high score is a prompt to inspect records, not a merge recommendation.
Open only what you need
Research & records
Latest case researchThe current conclusion from the durable research case file.Updated
Current conclusion
John was a bachelor farmer at Cross, Ballyclug, when he married Rachel Grey in
- The original certificate names his father as John Glasgow, farmer. His
1874 death return gives age sixty-five, occupation farmer and residence Cross; Michael Glasgow of Cross was present at death.
He is not the forty-year-old nephew in John Glasgow-1022's 1851 household, because that man was recorded as married since 1839. John Glasgow-1022 remains one possible father, but John Glasgow-1657, who was explicitly of Cross and died in 1836, is geographically stronger. Leave the parent field blank until a record distinguishes them.
Life and record timelineChronological mapped occurrences and their underlying sources.1 record
Profile-stated death place: Cross, Ballyclug, County Antrim, Ireland
Ballyclug civil parish — County Antrim
One-Tree export profile fields are search leads, not sources.
Source and mapping detail
WikiTree profile export for Glasgow-2407
No sufficiently specific citation match found.
Precision: Civil-parish representative point
Evidence assessmentWhat is supported, uncertain or disputed in the current case model.3 claims
Documented or strongly supported
No claims in this category have been formally assessed.
Working hypotheses and conflicts
No claims in this category have been formally assessed.
Research questionsOpen problems, missing bridges and the next records to inspect.0 open
No formal open question is recorded for this person.
Sources and provenanceStructured citations and source-quality classifications.5 sources
Source or provenance: quality describes the record layer, not every conclusion drawn from it.
- original General Register Office of Ireland, civil marriage register (https://www.irishgenealogy.ie/files/civil/marriage_returns/marriages_1865/11578/8260226.pdf), John Glasgow and Rachel Grey, 11 September 1865.
- original General Register Office of Ireland, civil birth register (https://civilrecords.irishgenealogy.ie/churchrecords/images/birth_returns/births_1871/03313/2214261.pdf), James Glasgow, 16 February 1871.
- original General Register Office of Ireland, civil death register (https://civilrecords.irishgenealogy.ie/churchrecords/images/deaths_returns/deaths_1874/020673/7253774.pdf), John Glasgow, 27 January 1874.
- derivative 1851 Irish Census Returns: detailed comma-delimited transcription (https://durrushistory.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/1851irishcensusreturnscommadelimitedtextfilejul24_071.pdf), Glenleslie household 21.
- tree_only WikiTree profile export for Glasgow-2407
Technical profile and raw captureDataset metadata, machine dossier and captured WikiTree biography.Advanced
WikiTree profile information
Glasgow-2407
John Glasgow
Updated 2026-08-19
Dataset: ONT_Glasco_2026-08-18T16_05.json · generated 2026-08-20
WikiTree biography, citations and relationship snapshot
Glasgow-2407 was captured 2026-08-19T11:32:40+00:00; WikiTree profile revision 2026-08-19.
Profile location claims
| Event | Date | Location | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| birth | — | County Antrim, Ireland | WikiTree profile field |
| death | — | Cross, Ballyclug, County Antrim, Ireland | WikiTree profile field |
Immediate relationship snapshot
| Relationship | Person | WikiTree ID | Dates and places returned |
|---|---|---|---|
| Children | James Glasgow | Glasgow-2408 | 1871-02-16 · Cross, Ballyclug, County Antrim, Ireland · 0000-00-00 |
| Spouses | Rachel Glasgow | Gray-38338 | 1833-00-00 · County Antrim, Ireland · 0000-00-00 · 1865-09-11 |
Profile categories
Estimated_Birth_Date Glasgow Name Study Glasgow_Name_Study
Record-bearing passages
- Biography John Glasgow was born about 1809 in County Antrim, Ireland. He was a farmer at Cross in Ballyclug parish.
- John married Rachel Grey on 11 September 1865. The original certificate describes him as a full-age bachelor and farmer of Cross and names his father as John Glasgow, farmer. Rachel was unmarried and also of Cross; her father was Robert Grey, farmer. General Register Office of Ireland, civil marriage register (https://www.irishgenealogy.ie/files/civil/marriage_returns/marriages_1865/11578/8260226.pdf), John Glasgow and Rachel Grey, 11 September 1865.
- Their son James Glasgow was born at Cross on 16 February 1871. The birth register names John as a farmer and Rachel by her former surname Gray. General Register Office of Ireland, civil birth register (https://civilrecords.irishgenealogy.ie/churchrecords/images/birth_returns/births_1871/03313/2214261.pdf), James Glasgow, 16 February 1871.
- John died at Cross on 27 January 1874, aged sixty-five. The register describes him as a married farmer; Michael Glasgow of Cross was present at his death. General Register Office of Ireland, civil death register (https://civilrecords.irishgenealogy.ie/churchrecords/images/deaths_returns/deaths_1874/020673/7253774.pdf), John Glasgow, 27 January 1874. Research Notes The marriage proves that John's father was named John and was a farmer, but it does not identify him uniquely. John Glasgow of Glenleslie is one candidate. John Glasgow of Cross, who died in 1836, is a geographically closer candidate.
- This John was not the married forty-year-old nephew recorded in the Glenleslie household in 1851. The census nephew was recorded as married since 1839, while This man's 1865 certificate explicitly calls him a bachelor. 1851 Irish Census Returns: detailed comma-delimited transcription (https://durrushistory.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/1851irishcensusreturnscommadelimitedtextfilejul24_071.pdf), Glenleslie household 21. His parents remain blank pending further evidence. Sources
Profile source citations
- General Register Office of Ireland, civil marriage register (https://www.irishgenealogy.ie/files/civil/marriage_returns/marriages_1865/11578/8260226.pdf), John Glasgow and Rachel Grey, 11 September 1865. source link 1
- General Register Office of Ireland, civil birth register (https://civilrecords.irishgenealogy.ie/churchrecords/images/birth_returns/births_1871/03313/2214261.pdf), James Glasgow, 16 February 1871. source link 1
- General Register Office of Ireland, civil death register (https://civilrecords.irishgenealogy.ie/churchrecords/images/deaths_returns/deaths_1874/020673/7253774.pdf), John Glasgow, 27 January 1874. source link 1
- 1851 Irish Census Returns: detailed comma-delimited transcription (https://durrushistory.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/1851irishcensusreturnscommadelimitedtextfilejul24_071.pdf), Glenleslie household 21. source link 1
Full captured biography text
Biography John Glasgow was born about 1809 in County Antrim, Ireland. He was a farmer at Cross in Ballyclug parish. John married Rachel Grey on 11 September 1865. The original certificate describes him as a full-age bachelor and farmer of Cross and names his father as John Glasgow, farmer. Rachel was unmarried and also of Cross; her father was Robert Grey, farmer. General Register Office of Ireland, civil marriage register (https://www.irishgenealogy.ie/files/civil/marriage_returns/marriages_1865/11578/8260226.pdf), John Glasgow and Rachel Grey, 11 September 1865. Their son James Glasgow was born at Cross on 16 February 1871. The birth register names John as a farmer and Rachel by her former surname Gray. General Register Office of Ireland, civil birth register (https://civilrecords.irishgenealogy.ie/churchrecords/images/birth_returns/births_1871/03313/2214261.pdf), James Glasgow, 16 February 1871. John died at Cross on 27 January 1874, aged sixty-five. The register describes him as a married farmer; Michael Glasgow of Cross was present at his death. General Register Office of Ireland, civil death register (https://civilrecords.irishgenealogy.ie/churchrecords/images/deaths_returns/deaths_1874/020673/7253774.pdf), John Glasgow, 27 January 1874. Research Notes The marriage proves that John's father was named John and was a farmer, but it does not identify him uniquely. John Glasgow of Glenleslie is one candidate. John Glasgow of Cross, who died in 1836, is a geographically closer candidate. This John was not the married forty-year-old nephew recorded in the Glenleslie household in 1851. The census nephew was recorded as married since 1839, while This man's 1865 certificate explicitly calls him a bachelor. 1851 Irish Census Returns: detailed comma-delimited transcription (https://durrushistory.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/1851irishcensusreturnscommadelimitedtextfilejul24_071.pdf), Glenleslie household 21. His parents remain blank pending further evidence. Sources
Raw WikiTree biography markup
[[Category:Glasgow Name Study]]
{{Estimated Date}}
== Biography ==
'''John Glasgow''' was born about 1809 in County Antrim, Ireland. He was a farmer
at Cross in Ballyclug parish.
John married [[Gray-38338|Rachel Grey]] on 11 September 1865. The original
certificate describes him as a full-age bachelor and farmer of Cross and names
his father as '''John Glasgow, farmer'''. Rachel was unmarried and also of Cross;
her father was Robert Grey, farmer.<ref name="Marriage1865">[https://www.irishgenealogy.ie/files/civil/marriage_returns/marriages_1865/11578/8260226.pdf General Register Office of Ireland, civil marriage register], John Glasgow and Rachel Grey, 11 September 1865.</ref>
Their son [[Glasgow-2408|James Glasgow]] was born at Cross on 16 February 1871.
The birth register names John as a farmer and Rachel by her former surname
Gray.<ref name="JamesBirth1871">[https://civilrecords.irishgenealogy.ie/churchrecords/images/birth_returns/births_1871/03313/2214261.pdf General Register Office of Ireland, civil birth register], James Glasgow, 16 February 1871.</ref>
John died at Cross on 27 January 1874, aged sixty-five. The register describes
him as a married farmer; Michael Glasgow of Cross was present at his death.<ref name="Death1874">[https://civilrecords.irishgenealogy.ie/churchrecords/images/deaths_returns/deaths_1874/020673/7253774.pdf General Register Office of Ireland, civil death register], John Glasgow, 27 January 1874.</ref>
== Research Notes ==
The marriage proves that John's father was named John and was a farmer, but it
does not identify him uniquely. [[Glasgow-1022|John Glasgow of Glenleslie]] is
one candidate. [[Glasgow-1657|John Glasgow of Cross]], who died in 1836, is a
geographically closer candidate.
This John was not the married forty-year-old nephew recorded in the Glenleslie
household in 1851. The census nephew was recorded as married since 1839, while
This man's 1865 certificate explicitly calls him a bachelor.<ref name="Glenleslie1851">[https://durrushistory.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/1851irishcensusreturnscommadelimitedtextfilejul24_071.pdf ''1851 Irish Census Returns: detailed comma-delimited transcription''], Glenleslie household 21.</ref> His parents remain blank pending further evidence.
== Sources ==
<references />