Glasgow Surname Project

Individual research record

George Glasgow

c. 1815 – ?

Glasgow-1400 · 1 mapped association

County Antrim, Ireland, United Kingdom→Death place unknown
View on mapOpen WikiTreeCompareReport a correction

At a glance

Identity & family

Tree links organise the family; documentary status still varies.

1Mapped records
7Close relations
2Evidence items
12Candidate leads
Birth
c. 1815 · County Antrim, Ireland, United Kingdom
Death
Not recorded · Place not recorded
Parents
John Glasgowuncertain
Spouses
Sarah (Alexander) Glasgow
Children
Adam GlasgowGeorge GlasgowMary GlasgowThomas GlasgowWilliam Glasgow
Gender
Male
WikiTree
Glasgow-1400
Research clusters
East Antrim/Kilwaughter cluster
Mapped descendants
5

Comparison context

These child positions and checks are the subject details used to rank possible parents below.

Naming sequence used by the parentage model

Paternal grandfather positionWilliam Glasgow (1839)
Maternal grandfather positionThomas Glasgow (1841)
Maternal grandmother positionMary Glasgow (1843)
Paternal grandmother positionNot identifiable from dated child profiles

Known-position checks: 1 support · 0 conflict. Ordinals retain unnamed children and recognise reused names.

Relationship comparison

Potential parents or duplicates

Compare scored leads with the subject details above—not proof.

Higher-signal leadReview carefullyWeak lead

Possible fathers5 leads

Automated fit44/100
Moderate Lead
Dates1778–?Generationat least 37 years age gapRecorded placesKilloquin electoral divisionIndependent clue breadth · 5Age · Collateral Naming · Household · Spouse · Two-GenerationExisting-tree context (not an independent clue)Exact Sibling Profiles · Sibling-Household ReplicationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • candidate is already linked as parent of 1 exact subject sibling profile (+16): Alexander Glasgow
  • candidate's birth is 61 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1839), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • known spouse Rosanna Unknown had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (37) at the subject's birth (+3)

a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Show complete scoring
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at least 37 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
  • candidate's birth is 61 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1839), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • another recorded child shares the subject's birth year (+2; possible twins or date uncertainty)
  • known spouse Rosanna Unknown had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (37) at the subject's birth (+3)
  • the same sex-aware parent-name position recurs independently in sibling households: John Glasgow → Alexander Glasgow (+3)
  • candidate is already linked as parent of 1 exact subject sibling profile (+16): Alexander Glasgow
  • candidate's sibling and niece/nephew network repeats names in the subject's descendant line (three rarest at most): Adam +12 (15 public profiles; sibling Adam Glasgow) (+12 total)

Deductions and cautions: a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Automated fit31/100
Weak Lead
Dates1780–1817Generation35 years age gapRecorded placesCalliaqua, Saint George, Saint Vincent and the GrenadinesIndependent clue breadth · 4Age · Household · Rare Branch-Name Recurrence · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 35-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 59 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1839), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • subject's birth fits within the candidate's overall child-bearing span (1810–1816) (+3; children are not tied to one spouse)

a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 35-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 59 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1839), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • subject's birth fits within the candidate's overall child-bearing span (1810–1816) (+3; children are not tied to one spouse)
  • uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Adam +12 (15 public profiles; subject branch: Adam Glasgow; candidate branch: Adam Glasgow) (+12 total)

Deductions and cautions: a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Show 3 lower-scoring possible fathers
Automated fit28/100
Weak Lead
Dates1779–?Generation36 years age gapRecorded placesLocation not supplied — profile holding pointIndependent clue breadth · 5Age · Sex-Aware Ordered Naming · Spouse · Tradition Validation · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 36-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • known spouse Janet (Thomson) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (32) at the subject's birth (+7)
  • candidate's birth is 60 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1839), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)

a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 36-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 60 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1839), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • known spouse Janet (Thomson) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (32) at the subject's birth (+7)
  • candidate's name matches the first dated son William Glasgow, the expected father position for a male subject (+5; catalogue rarity 0, William in 223 profiles)
  • family naming controls: 1 supporting and 0 conflicting known positions (already reflected in naming weight)

Deductions and cautions: a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Automated fit26/100
Weak Lead
Dates1780–?Generation35 years age gapRecorded placesBaronyIndependent clue breadth · 3Age · Spouse · Two-GenerationExisting-tree context (not an independent clue)Sibling-Household ReplicationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 35-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • known spouse Jean (Lang) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (35) at the subject's birth (+7)
  • candidate's birth is 59 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1839), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)

a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 35-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 59 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1839), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • known spouse Jean (Lang) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (35) at the subject's birth (+7)
  • the same sex-aware parent-name position recurs independently in sibling households: John Glasgow → Alexander Glasgow (+3)

Deductions and cautions: a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Automated fit26/100
Weak Lead
Dates1766–1836Generation49 years age gapRecorded placesCounty Antrim, Ireland · Cross, Ballymoney, County Antrim, Ireland, United Kingdom · Cross townland, Ballymoney parishIndependent clue breadth · 6Age · Broad Geography · Household · Rare Branch-Name Recurrence · Spouse · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • possible 49-year parent-child age gap (+10)
  • candidate's birth is 73 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1839), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • known spouse Jane (McClure) Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (42) at the subject's birth (+3)

a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving)

Show complete scoring
  • possible 49-year parent-child age gap (+10)
  • candidate's birth is 73 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1839), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • weak broad-area overlap: antrim (+1; not a locality match)
  • another recorded child shares the subject's birth year (+2; possible twins or date uncertainty)
  • known spouse Jane (McClure) Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (42) at the subject's birth (+3)
  • uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Adam +12 (15 public profiles; subject branch: Adam Glasgow; candidate branch: Adam Dickie Glasgow) (+12 total)

Deductions and cautions: a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving)

Possible mothers5 leads

Automated fit40/100
Moderate Lead
Dates1788–1867Generation27 years age gapRecorded placesFranceIndependent clue breadth · 4Age · Collateral Naming · Spouse-Specific Child Window · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 27-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1804–1827) (+6)
  • candidate's birth is 51 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1839), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)

locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 27-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 51 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1839), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1804–1827) (+6)
  • candidate's sibling and niece/nephew network repeats names in the subject's descendant line (three rarest at most): Adam +12 (15 public profiles; niece/nephew Adam Glasgow) (+12 total)

Deductions and cautions: locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Automated fit34/100
Weak Lead
Dates1790–?Generation25 years age gapRecorded placesWythe County Virginia · Pulaski County VirginiaIndependent clue breadth · 4Age · Sex-Aware Ordered Naming · Spouse-Specific Child Window · Two-GenerationExisting-tree context (not an independent clue)Rare Sibling-Name PatternSame-spouse child windowWilliam GlasgowCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 25-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 49 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1839), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1812–1821) (+6; other parent William Glasgow)

locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 25-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 49 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1839), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1812–1821) (+6; other parent William Glasgow)
  • a candidate spouse matches the first dated son William Glasgow, the expected father position (+3; William in 223 profiles)
  • candidate's other children share uncommon given names with the subject's recorded siblings: Nancy +3 (49 public profiles) (+3 total)

Deductions and cautions: locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Show 3 lower-scoring possible mothers
Automated fit29/100
Weak Lead
Dates1773–1858Generation42 years age gapRecorded placesAntrim, County Antrim, Ireland · Racavan, County Antrim, Ireland · County Antrim — exact locality unprovedIndependent clue breadth · 5Age · Broad Geography · Household · Rare Branch-Name Recurrence · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • possible 42-year parent-child age gap (+10)
  • candidate's birth is 66 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1839), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same broad administrative area only (+1; not a locality match)

No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required

Show complete scoring
  • possible 42-year parent-child age gap (+10)
  • candidate's birth is 66 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1839), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same broad administrative area only (+1; not a locality match)
  • another recorded child shares the subject's birth year (+2; possible twins or date uncertainty)
  • uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Adam +12 (15 public profiles; subject branch: Adam Glasgow; candidate branch: Adam Dickie Glasgow) (+12 total)

Deductions and cautions: No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required

Automated fit28/100
Weak Lead
Dates1800–?Generation15 years age gapRecorded placesIreland · County Antrim — exact locality unprovedIndependent clue breadth · 4Age · Broad Geography · Collateral Naming · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • possible 15-year parent-child age gap (+10)
  • candidate's birth is 39 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1839), a marginal two-generation interval (+1)
  • same broad administrative area only (+1; not a locality match)

No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required

Show complete scoring
  • possible 15-year parent-child age gap (+10)
  • candidate's birth is 39 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1839), a marginal two-generation interval (+1)
  • same broad administrative area only (+1; not a locality match)
  • candidate's sibling and niece/nephew network repeats names in the subject's descendant line (three rarest at most): Adam +16 (15 public profiles; niece/nephew Adam Glasgow, niece/nephew Adam McKeown; +4 repetition bonus) (+16 total)

Deductions and cautions: No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required

Automated fit27/100
Weak Lead
Dates1799–1837Generation16 years age gapRecorded placesCounty Antrim, Ireland · County Antrim, Ireland, United Kingdom · County Antrim — exact locality unprovedIndependent clue breadth · 4Age · Broad Geography · Collateral Naming · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • possible 16-year parent-child age gap (+10)
  • candidate's birth is 40 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1839), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same broad administrative area only (+1; not a locality match)

No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required

Show complete scoring
  • possible 16-year parent-child age gap (+10)
  • candidate's birth is 40 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1839), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same broad administrative area only (+1; not a locality match)
  • candidate's sibling and niece/nephew network repeats names in the subject's descendant line (three rarest at most): Adam +12 (15 public profiles; sibling Reverend Adam Dickie Glasgow) (+12 total)

Deductions and cautions: No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required

How parent leads are calculated

Automated leads use birth surnames—not married surnames—as parental eligibility, role-specific biological age limits, bounded and approximate-date uncertainty, household chronology, specific time-aware localities, mapped distance, tenancy succession, migration destinations and sex-aware Scottish naming positions across generations. People already attached as the subject's parents stay in the identity summary and are excluded from this alternative-candidate list, regardless of relationship confidence. The main calibration uses clues available on disconnected profiles; existing parent and sibling links are retained as comparison context rather than treated as transferable evidence. Common ordered names and grandparent-to-child echoes receive a small non-zero weight, so a John or James match can support several independent criteria without producing a lead alone. Rare names, repeated bearers and bundles across otherwise distinct branches receive substantially more weight according to catalogue frequency. An exact migration place is weighted by its rarity and repetition across both branches; a shared destination country is worth only one point. Extra weight is added only when at least three independent clue types converge: naming, locality, specific migration, household chronology or collateral networks. Sparse profiles retain a clearly labelled chronology-only fallback instead of disappearing. Countries, states, counties and research clusters do not count as a shared locality, and fallback, broad representative or kin-inferred coordinates are excluded from distance scoring. Shared descendant profiles are removed before branch-name comparison. A candidate already recorded as a parent-in-law is excluded. A confident or independently supported parent is treated as settled; uncertain and unassessed attachments remain open to alternative comparison. A different linked parent, an uncle/aunt or grandparent path, and a matching existing child profile prevent an alternative from being classified as a strong direct-parent lead until the underlying tree conflict or duplicate is resolved. Familiar forms such as Bessie are normalised. Surname remains an eligibility filter worth zero points.

Naming customs, shared farms and occupations are circumstantial. Children, spouses and collateral relatives may be missing, and tree-derived family networks are not independent evidence. Scores rank research leads; they do not prove parentage.

Same-name candidate

George GlasgowGlasgow-1307

Automated fit38/100
Similar Person
Dates1811–?PlacesKirknewton, Edinburghshire, Scotland, United KingdomParent comparisonSame parent name; profile identity unproved
Why it may fit
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 4 (+18)
  • same parent name without a shared profile ID: John Glasgow (+2)

uncertain father attachments differ (no deduction)

Full comparison detail
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 4 (+18)
  • same parent name without a shared profile ID: John Glasgow (+2)

Conflicts: uncertain father attachments differ (no deduction)

Open side-by-side comparison

Same-name candidate

George GlasgowGlasgow-638

Automated fit38/100
Similar Person
Dates1818–1900PlacesCrawford, Lanarkshire, Scotland, United Kingdom → Leicestershire, England, United KingdomParent comparisonNo shared parent is indexed
Why it may fit
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 3 (+18)
  • child given-name pattern overlaps: Mary

No indexed conflict

Full comparison detail
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 3 (+18)
  • child given-name pattern overlaps: Mary

Conflicts: No indexed conflict

Open side-by-side comparison
How duplicate leads are calculated

Dates are eligibility gates, not merely deductions: chronologically impossible people are excluded. Dates, places, spouses, parent certainty and children's profiles and names are then compared. A high score is a prompt to inspect records, not a merge recommendation.

Open only what you need

Research & records

Latest case researchThe current conclusion from the durable research case file.Updated

Current conclusion

Glasgow-1400 · updated 2026-08-11

George's 1851 household was Glenleslie house 20; John Glasgow-1022 and Rose were at house 21. George's wife Sarah Alexander and the Alexander relatives in John's household place both families in the same Glasgow-Alexander network.

John is therefore the leading candidate for George's father, but the relationship is not proved. Keep it uncertain or leave George parentless. Do not move George under Adam Glasgow-3902 because his fifth child/fourth son was named Adam; household placement is materially better evidence than that naming pattern.

Life and record timelineChronological mapped occurrences and their underlying sources.1 record
Evidence assessmentWhat is supported, uncertain or disputed in the current case model.15 claims
1Original
1Tree Only

Documented or strongly supported

No claims in this category have been formally assessed.

Working hypotheses and conflicts

No claims in this category have been formally assessed.

Research questionsOpen problems, missing bridges and the next records to inspect.0 open

No formal open question is recorded for this person.

Sources and provenanceStructured citations and source-quality classifications.2 sources

Source or provenance: quality describes the record layer, not every conclusion drawn from it.

  1. original http://www.census.nationalarchives.ie/pages/1851/Antrim/Kilconway/Dunaghy/Glenleslie/20/
  2. tree_only WikiTree profile export for Glasgow-1400
Technical profile and raw captureDataset metadata, machine dossier and captured WikiTree biography.Advanced

WikiTree profile information

Dataset: ONT_Glasco_2026-08-18T16_05.json · generated 2026-08-20

Machine-readable dossier

WikiTree biography, citations and relationship snapshot

Glasgow-1400 was captured 2026-08-07T09:54:35+00:00; WikiTree profile revision 2024-09-23.

Profile location claims

EventDateLocationStatus
birth—County Antrim, IrelandWikiTree profile field

Immediate relationship snapshot

RelationshipPersonWikiTree IDDates and places returned
ParentsJohn GlasgowGlasgow-10221751-00-00 · County Antrim, Ireland · 1852-00-00 · County Antrim, Ireland, United Kingdom
ChildrenWilliam GlasgowGlasgow-14011839-00-00 · Antrim · 0000-00-00
ChildrenThomas GlasgowGlasgow-14021841-00-00 · Antrim · 0000-00-00
ChildrenMary GlasgowGlasgow-14031843-00-00 · County Antrim, Ireland · 0000-00-00
ChildrenGeorge GlasgowGlasgow-14041844-00-00 · Antrim · 0000-00-00
ChildrenAdam GlasgowGlasgow-14051849-00-00 · Antrim · 0000-00-00
SiblingsRobert GlasgowGlasgow-13671779-00-00 · County Tyrone, Ireland · 0000-00-00
SiblingsSamuel GlasgowGlasgow-29081791-00-00 · County Londonderry, Ireland · 1875-08-17 · Lisnagaver, Rasharkin, County Antrim, Ireland
SiblingsJohn GlasgowGlasgow-8671801-00-00 · Rasharkin, Kilconway, Antrim · 0000-00-00
SiblingsAlexander GlasgowGlasgow-9511811-00-00 · County Antrim, Ireland · 1861-00-00 · Glasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland, United Kingdom
SiblingsNancy GlasgowGlasgow-13691815-00-00 · Dunaghy, Kilconway, Antrim · 1847-00-00
SiblingsAndrew GlasgowGlasgow-10501818-00-00 · Dunaghy, Kilconway, Antrim · 1848-00-00
SiblingsEllen GlasgowGlasgow-13681825-00-00 · Dunaghy, Kilconway, Antrim · 0000-00-00
SpousesSarah GlasgowAlexander-225791811-00-00 · Antrim · 0000-00-00

Record-bearing passages

  • Biography George was born about 1815.
  • {| class="wikitable sortable" style="padding: 5px; width:100%;" |+ Family Record |- ! style="background-color:#E1F0B4;" | Surname ! style="background-color:#E1F0B4;" | Forename ! style="background-color:#E1F0B4;" | Age (Years) ! style="background-color:#E1F0B4;" | Relation to Head ! style="background-color:#E1F0B4;" | Marital Status ! style="background-color:#E1F0B4;" | Occupation ! style="background-color:#E1F0B4;" | Education ! style="background-color:#E1F0B4;" | Native Country, County, or City |- | Glasgow || George || 36 || Head of Family || Married || Linen Weaver || Read || Antrim |- | Glasgow || Sarah || 40 || Wife || Married || House Keeper || Read || Down |- | Glasgow || William || 12 || Son || Not Married || Linen Weaver || Read || Antrim |- | Glasgow || Thos || 10 || Son || Not Married || Winding Quills || Read || Antrim |- | Glasgow || Mary || 8 || Daughter || Not Married || None || Cannot Read || Antrim |- | Glasgow || George || 7 || Son || Not Married || None || Cannot Read || Antrim |- | Glasgow || Adam || 2 || Son || Not Married || None || Cannot Read || Antrim |}

  • {| class="wikitable sortable" style="padding: 20px; width:100%;" |+ 1851 Census Data |- ! style="background-color:#E1F0B4;" | Name ! style="background-color:#E1F0B4;" | Birth ! style="background-color:#E1F0B4;" | Location ! style="background-color:#E1F0B4;" | Occupation ! style="background-color:#E1F0B4;" | Read/Write ! style="background-color:#E1F0B4;" | Wife ! style="background-color:#E1F0B4;" | # of Children ! style="background-color:#E1F0B4;" | Notes |- | Alexander || 1811 || Lisnagaver || Farmer || Y || Mary || 6 || - |- | John || 1801 || Lisnagaver || Farmer || Y || Margaret || 5 || - |- | Thomas || 1816 || Lisnagaver || Farmer || Y || Mary Ann || 7 || - |- | Robert || 1774 || Glenleslie || Farmer || N || Cathn Glasgow || 3 || - |- | John || 1751 || Glenleslie || Farmer || N || Rose || 3 || - |- | George || 1816 || Glenleslie || Weaver || Y || Sarah || 3 || - |- | William || 1811 || Galdernaugh || Weaver || N || Ellin || 5 || - |- | Robert || 1811 || Danbought || Weaver || Y || Margret || 4 || - |} Sources

Profile source citations

  1. http://www.census.nationalarchives.ie/pages/1851/Antrim/Kilconway/Dunaghy/Glenleslie/20/ source link 1
Full captured biography text
Biography
George was born about 1815.

{| class="wikitable sortable" style="padding: 5px; width:100%;"
|+ Family Record
|-
! style="background-color:#E1F0B4;" | Surname 
! style="background-color:#E1F0B4;" | Forename 
! style="background-color:#E1F0B4;" | Age (Years) 
! style="background-color:#E1F0B4;" | Relation to Head 
! style="background-color:#E1F0B4;" | Marital Status 
! style="background-color:#E1F0B4;" | Occupation 
! style="background-color:#E1F0B4;" | Education 
! style="background-color:#E1F0B4;" | Native Country, County, or City
|-
| Glasgow || George || 36 || Head of Family || Married || Linen Weaver || Read || Antrim
|-
| Glasgow || Sarah || 40 || Wife || Married || House Keeper || Read || Down
|-
| Glasgow || William || 12 || Son || Not Married || Linen Weaver || Read || Antrim
|-
| Glasgow || Thos || 10 || Son || Not Married || Winding Quills || Read || Antrim
|-
| Glasgow || Mary || 8 || Daughter || Not Married || None || Cannot Read || Antrim
|-
| Glasgow || George || 7 || Son || Not Married || None || Cannot Read || Antrim
|-
| Glasgow || Adam || 2 || Son || Not Married || None || Cannot Read || Antrim
|}

{| class="wikitable sortable" style="padding: 20px; width:100%;"
|+ 1851 Census Data
|-
! style="background-color:#E1F0B4;" | Name 
! style="background-color:#E1F0B4;" | Birth 
! style="background-color:#E1F0B4;" | Location 
! style="background-color:#E1F0B4;" | Occupation 
! style="background-color:#E1F0B4;" | Read/Write 
! style="background-color:#E1F0B4;" | Wife 
! style="background-color:#E1F0B4;" | # of Children 
! style="background-color:#E1F0B4;" | Notes
|-
| Alexander || 1811 || Lisnagaver || Farmer || Y || Mary || 6 || -
|-
| John || 1801 || Lisnagaver || Farmer || Y || Margaret || 5 || -
|-
| Thomas || 1816 || Lisnagaver || Farmer || Y || Mary Ann || 7 || -
|-
| Robert || 1774 || Glenleslie || Farmer || N || Cathn Glasgow || 3 || -
|-
| John || 1751 || Glenleslie || Farmer || N || Rose || 3 || -
|-
| George || 1816 || Glenleslie || Weaver || Y || Sarah || 3 || -
|-
| William || 1811 || Galdernaugh || Weaver || N || Ellin || 5 || -
|-
| Robert || 1811 || Danbought || Weaver || Y || Margret || 4 || -
|}
Sources
* http://www.census.nationalarchives.ie/pages/1851/Antrim/Kilconway/Dunaghy/Glenleslie/20/
Raw WikiTree biography markup
== Biography ==
George was born about 1815.

{| class="wikitable sortable" style="padding: 5px; width:100%;"
|+ Family Record
|-
! style="background-color:#E1F0B4;" | Surname 
! style="background-color:#E1F0B4;" | Forename 
! style="background-color:#E1F0B4;" | Age (Years) 
! style="background-color:#E1F0B4;" | Relation to Head 
! style="background-color:#E1F0B4;" | Marital Status 
! style="background-color:#E1F0B4;" | Occupation 
! style="background-color:#E1F0B4;" | Education 
! style="background-color:#E1F0B4;" | Native Country, County, or City
|-
| Glasgow || George || 36 || Head of Family || Married || Linen Weaver || Read || Antrim
|-
| Glasgow || Sarah || 40 || Wife || Married || House Keeper || Read || Down
|-
| Glasgow || William || 12 || Son || Not Married || Linen Weaver || Read || Antrim
|-
| Glasgow || Thos || 10 || Son || Not Married || Winding Quills || Read || Antrim
|-
| Glasgow || Mary || 8 || Daughter || Not Married || None || Cannot Read || Antrim
|-
| Glasgow || George || 7 || Son || Not Married || None || Cannot Read || Antrim
|-
| Glasgow || Adam || 2 || Son || Not Married || None || Cannot Read || Antrim
|}

{| class="wikitable sortable" style="padding: 20px; width:100%;"
|+ 1851 Census Data
|-
! style="background-color:#E1F0B4;" | Name 
! style="background-color:#E1F0B4;" | Birth  
! style="background-color:#E1F0B4;" | Location 
! style="background-color:#E1F0B4;" | Occupation 
! style="background-color:#E1F0B4;" | Read/Write 
! style="background-color:#E1F0B4;" | Wife 
! style="background-color:#E1F0B4;" | # of Children 
! style="background-color:#E1F0B4;" | Notes
|-
| [[Glasgow-951|Alexander]] || 1811 || Lisnagaver || Farmer || Y || Mary  || 6 || -
|-
| [[Glasgow-1370|John]] || 1801 || Lisnagaver || Farmer || Y || Margaret  || 5 || -
|-
| [[Glasgow-987|Thomas]] || 1816 || Lisnagaver || Farmer || Y || Mary Ann  || 7 || -
|-
| [[Glasgow-1367|Robert]] || 1774 || Glenleslie || Farmer || N || Cathn Glasgow || 3 || -
|-
| [[Glasgow-1022|John]] || 1751 || Glenleslie || Farmer || N || Rose  || 3 || -
|-
| [[Glasgow-1400|George]] || 1816 || Glenleslie || Weaver || Y || Sarah  || 3 || -
|-
| [[Glasgow-1387|William]] || 1811 || Galdernaugh || Weaver || N || Ellin  || 5 || -
|-
| [[Glasgow-1049|Robert]] || 1811 || Danbought || Weaver || Y || Margret  || 4 || -
|}


== Sources ==
<references />
* http://www.census.nationalarchives.ie/pages/1851/Antrim/Kilconway/Dunaghy/Glenleslie/20/