Glasgow Surname Project

Individual research record

Andrew Glasgow

1818 – 1848

Glasgow-1050 · 1 mapped association

Dunaghy, Kilconway, AntrimDunaghy, Kilconway, Antrim

At a glance

Identity & family

Tree links organise the family; documentary status still varies.

1Mapped records
3Close relations
4Evidence items
12Candidate leads
Birth
1818 · Dunaghy, Kilconway, Antrim
Death
1848 · Dunaghy, Kilconway, Antrim
Parents
John GlasgowconfidentRose Alexanderunmarked
Spouses
Not recorded
Children
Samuel John Glasgow
Gender
Male
WikiTree
Glasgow-1050
Research clusters
East Antrim/Kilwaughter cluster
Mapped descendants
6

Comparison context

These child positions and checks are the subject details used to rank possible parents below.

Naming sequence used by the parentage model

Paternal grandfather positionSamuel John Glasgow (1845)
Maternal grandfather positionNot identifiable from dated child profiles
Maternal grandmother positionNot identifiable from dated child profiles
Paternal grandmother positionNot identifiable from dated child profiles

Known-position checks: 0 support · 0 conflict. Ordinals retain unnamed children and recognise reused names.

Relationship comparison

Potential parents or duplicates

Compare scored leads with the subject details above—not proof.

Higher-signal leadReview carefullyWeak lead

Possible fathers5 leads

Automated fit19/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1767–1851Generation51 years age gapRecorded placesIreland · Guernsey County, Ohio, United States · Drumlamph townlandIndependent clue breadth · 7Age · Household · Indirect Multi-Factor Convergence · Mapped Proximity · Rare Branch-Name Recurrence · Spouse · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • possible 51-year parent-child age gap (+10)
  • known spouse Mary Arthur had a plausible maternal age (44) at the subject's birth (+7)
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming

a different father is marked confident (−25; WikiTree: confident parent)

Show complete scoring
  • possible 51-year parent-child age gap (+10)
  • candidate's birth is 78 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1845), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • mapped Inishrush is 22.1 km from the subject's birth-period Dunaghy civil parish — County Antrim (+1; one or both placements are unproved)
  • a known child was born within 3 years of the subject (+3)
  • known spouse Mary Arthur had a plausible maternal age (44) at the subject's birth (+7)
  • uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Rose +14 (9 public profiles; subject branch: Rose Ann Glasgow; candidate branch: Rose May Glasgow, Rose Glasgow; +2 repetition bonus) (+14 total)
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming

Deductions and cautions: a different father is marked confident (−25; WikiTree: confident parent)

Automated fit17/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1778–?Generationat least 40 years age gapRecorded placesKilloquin electoral divisionIndependent clue breadth · 7Age · Household · Indirect Multi-Factor Convergence · Mapped Proximity · Rare Branch-Name Recurrence · Spouse · Two-GenerationExisting-tree context (not an independent clue)Sibling-Household ReplicationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming
  • candidate's birth is 67 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1845), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • a known child was born within 3 years of the subject (+3)

a different father is marked confident (−25; WikiTree: confident parent)

Show complete scoring
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at least 40 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
  • candidate's birth is 67 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1845), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • mapped Killoquin electoral division is 14.9 km from the subject's birth-period Dunaghy civil parish — County Antrim (+2; one or both placements are unproved)
  • a known child was born within 3 years of the subject (+3)
  • known spouse Rosanna Unknown had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (40) at the subject's birth (+3)
  • the same sex-aware parent-name position recurs independently in sibling households: John Glasgow → Alexander Glasgow (+3)
  • uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Rose +12 (9 public profiles; subject branch: Rose Ann Glasgow; candidate branch: Rose Ann (Glasgow) Redpath) (+12 total)
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming

Deductions and cautions: a different father is marked confident (−25; WikiTree: confident parent)

Show 3 lower-scoring possible fathers
Automated fit13/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1779–?Generation39 years age gapRecorded placesCounty Tyrone, Ireland · Doonbought townland · Glenleslie townlandIndependent clue breadth · 6Age · Local Sibling Birth · Mapped Proximity · Spouse · Spouse-Specific Child Window · Two-GenerationSame-spouse child windowCatherine (Unknown) GlasgowCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 39-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 66 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1845), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • known spouse Catherine (Unknown) Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (35) at the subject's birth (+3)

a different father is marked confident (−25; WikiTree: confident parent)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 39-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 66 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1845), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • mapped Glenleslie townland is 1.9 km from the subject's birth-period Dunaghy civil parish — County Antrim (+3; one or both placements are unproved)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1801–1822) (+6; other parent Catherine (Unknown) Glasgow)
  • candidate has another child, Robert Glasgow Sr, born 7 years from the subject in the same specific birth locality (+4; possible sibling-household clue)
  • known spouse Catherine (Unknown) Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (35) at the subject's birth (+3)

Deductions and cautions: a different father is marked confident (−25; WikiTree: confident parent)

Automated fit11/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1794–1878Generation24 years age gapRecorded placesInishrush, Tamlaght O’Crilly, County Londonderry · St Nossonus — Tamlaght O'Crilly Lower graveyardIndependent clue breadth · 5Age · Great-Grandparent Name Echo · Indirect Multi-Factor Convergence · Mapped Proximity · Two-GenerationExisting-tree context (not an independent clue)Sibling-Household ReplicationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 24-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming
  • candidate's birth is 51 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1845), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)

a different father is marked confident (−25; WikiTree: confident parent)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 24-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 51 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1845), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • mapped St Nossonus — Tamlaght O'Crilly Lower graveyard is 21.4 km from the subject's birth-period Dunaghy civil parish — County Antrim (+1; one or both placements are unproved)
  • the same sex-aware parent-name position recurs independently in sibling households: John Glasgow → James Garvin Glasgow (+3)
  • candidate's parents' names recur among the subject's grandchildren: Rose +5 (+5 total; weak multigeneration clue)
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming

Deductions and cautions: a different father is marked confident (−25; WikiTree: confident parent)

Automated fit8/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1792–1873Generation26 years age gapRecorded placesBarony, Lanarkshire, Scotland · County Cork, Ireland, United Kingdom · County Cork — exact locality unprovedIndependent clue breadth · 5Age · Household · Rare Branch-Name Recurrence · Spouse · Two-GenerationExisting-tree context (not an independent clue)Sibling-Household ReplicationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 26-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 53 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1845), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • a known child was born within 2 years of the subject (+3)

a different father is marked confident (−25; WikiTree: confident parent); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 26-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 53 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1845), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • a known child was born within 2 years of the subject (+3)
  • known spouse Ellen (Smith) Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (23) at the subject's birth (+3)
  • the same sex-aware parent-name position recurs independently in sibling households: John Glasgow → Alexander Glasgow (+3)
  • uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Rose +12 (9 public profiles; subject branch: Rose Ann Glasgow; candidate branch: Rose Mary (Glasgow) Broad) (+12 total)

Deductions and cautions: a different father is marked confident (−25; WikiTree: confident parent); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Possible mothers5 leads

Automated fit22/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1800–?Generation18 years age gapRecorded placesIreland · County Antrim — exact locality unprovedIndependent clue breadth · 4Age · Broad Geography · Collateral Naming · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 18-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 45 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1845), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • weak broad-area overlap: antrim (+1; not a locality match)

a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 18-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 45 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1845), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • weak broad-area overlap: antrim (+1; not a locality match)
  • candidate's sibling and niece/nephew network repeats names in the subject's descendant line (three rarest at most): Rose +14 (9 public profiles; niece/nephew Rose Anna Forsythe McKeown, sibling Rose Ann McKeown; +2 repetition bonus) (+14 total)

Deductions and cautions: a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15)

Automated fit22/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1795–?Generation23 years age gapRecorded placesGlasgowIndependent clue breadth · 4Age · Household · Rare Branch-Name Recurrence · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 23-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 50 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1845), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • a known child was born within 2 years of the subject (+3)

a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 23-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 50 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1845), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • a known child was born within 2 years of the subject (+3)
  • uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Rose +12 (9 public profiles; subject branch: Rose Ann Glasgow; candidate branch: Rose Mary (Glasgow) Broad) (+12 total)

Deductions and cautions: a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Show 3 lower-scoring possible mothers

Possible Mother

Mary ArthurArthur-2480

Automated fit22/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1774–1859Generation44 years age gapRecorded placesIreland · Londonderry, Guernsey, Ohio, United States · InishrushIndependent clue breadth · 6Age · Household · Indirect Multi-Factor Convergence · Mapped Proximity · Rare Branch-Name Recurrence · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • possible 44-year parent-child age gap (+10)
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming
  • candidate's birth is 71 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1845), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)

a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15)

Show complete scoring
  • possible 44-year parent-child age gap (+10)
  • candidate's birth is 71 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1845), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • mapped Inishrush is 22.1 km from the subject's birth-period Dunaghy civil parish — County Antrim (+1; one or both placements are unproved)
  • a known child was born within 3 years of the subject (+3)
  • uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Rose +14 (9 public profiles; subject branch: Rose Ann Glasgow; candidate branch: Rose May Glasgow, Rose Glasgow; +2 repetition bonus) (+14 total)
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming

Deductions and cautions: a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15)

Automated fit21/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1778–1822Generationat least 40 years age gapRecorded placesKilloquin electoral divisionIndependent clue breadth · 6Age · Household · Indirect Multi-Factor Convergence · Mapped Proximity · Rare Branch-Name Recurrence · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming
  • candidate's birth is 67 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1845), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • a known child was born within 3 years of the subject (+3)

a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15)

Show complete scoring
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at least 40 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
  • candidate's birth is 67 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1845), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • mapped Killoquin electoral division is 14.9 km from the subject's birth-period Dunaghy civil parish — County Antrim (+2; one or both placements are unproved)
  • a known child was born within 3 years of the subject (+3)
  • uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Rose +12 (9 public profiles; subject branch: Rose Ann Glasgow; candidate branch: Rose Ann (Glasgow) Redpath) (+12 total)
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming

Deductions and cautions: a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15)

Automated fit19/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1802–?Generation16 years age gapRecorded placesIreland · Boveedy / Bovedy townland and village · County Antrim — exact locality unprovedIndependent clue breadth · 5Age · Collateral Naming · Indirect Multi-Factor Convergence · Mapped Proximity · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • possible 16-year parent-child age gap (+10)
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming
  • candidate's birth is 43 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1845), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)

a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15)

Show complete scoring
  • possible 16-year parent-child age gap (+10)
  • candidate's birth is 43 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1845), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • mapped Boveedy / Bovedy townland and village is 23.1 km from the subject's birth-period Dunaghy civil parish — County Antrim (+1; one or both placements are unproved)
  • candidate's sibling and niece/nephew network repeats names in the subject's descendant line (three rarest at most): Rose +14 (9 public profiles; niece/nephew Rose Anna Forsythe McKeown, sibling Rose Ann McKeown; +2 repetition bonus) (+14 total)
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming

Deductions and cautions: a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15)

How parent leads are calculated

Automated leads use birth surnames—not married surnames—as parental eligibility, role-specific biological age limits, bounded and approximate-date uncertainty, household chronology, specific time-aware localities, mapped distance, tenancy succession, migration destinations and sex-aware Scottish naming positions across generations. People already attached as the subject's parents stay in the identity summary and are excluded from this alternative-candidate list, regardless of relationship confidence. The main calibration uses clues available on disconnected profiles; existing parent and sibling links are retained as comparison context rather than treated as transferable evidence. Common ordered names and grandparent-to-child echoes receive a small non-zero weight, so a John or James match can support several independent criteria without producing a lead alone. Rare names, repeated bearers and bundles across otherwise distinct branches receive substantially more weight according to catalogue frequency. An exact migration place is weighted by its rarity and repetition across both branches; a shared destination country is worth only one point. Extra weight is added only when at least three independent clue types converge: naming, locality, specific migration, household chronology or collateral networks. Sparse profiles retain a clearly labelled chronology-only fallback instead of disappearing. Countries, states, counties and research clusters do not count as a shared locality, and fallback, broad representative or kin-inferred coordinates are excluded from distance scoring. Shared descendant profiles are removed before branch-name comparison. A candidate already recorded as a parent-in-law is excluded. A confident or independently supported parent is treated as settled; uncertain and unassessed attachments remain open to alternative comparison. A different linked parent, an uncle/aunt or grandparent path, and a matching existing child profile prevent an alternative from being classified as a strong direct-parent lead until the underlying tree conflict or duplicate is resolved. Familiar forms such as Bessie are normalised. Surname remains an eligibility filter worth zero points.

Naming customs, shared farms and occupations are circumstantial. Children, spouses and collateral relatives may be missing, and tree-derived family networks are not independent evidence. Scores rank research leads; they do not prove parentage.

Same-name candidate

Andrew GlasgowGlasgow-3495

Automated fit36/100
Similar Person
Dates1814–?PlacesIreland, United Kingdom → Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United StatesParent comparisonNo shared parent is indexed
Why it may fit
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 4 (+18)

No indexed conflict

Full comparison detail
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 4 (+18)

Conflicts: No indexed conflict

Automated fit22/100
Similar Person
Dates1830–?PlacesPennsylvania, United StatesParent comparisonNo shared parent is indexed
Why it may fit
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 12 (+2)
  • child given-name pattern overlaps: Samuel

No indexed conflict

Full comparison detail
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 12 (+2)
  • child given-name pattern overlaps: Samuel

Conflicts: No indexed conflict

How duplicate leads are calculated

Dates are eligibility gates, not merely deductions: chronologically impossible people are excluded. Dates, places, spouses, parent certainty and children's profiles and names are then compared. A high score is a prompt to inspect records, not a merge recommendation.

Open only what you need

Research & records

Latest case researchThe current conclusion from the durable research case file.Updated

Current conclusion

Glasgow-1050 · updated 2026-08-13

The detailed 1851 Glenleslie return directly identifies Andrew as a son of John Glasgow. It records Andrew as a thirty-year-old linen weaver who died of consumption in 1848. The return does not identify his mother.

Samuel John Glasgow-1419 is a strong probable son. Samuel's original 1866 marriage names his father as Andrew Glasgow, labourer. His age, County Antrim origin and the rarity of an adult Andrew in this locality fit this Andrew, but the certificate does not give the father's residence and therefore falls short of a unique identification.

Life and record timelineChronological mapped occurrences and their underlying sources.1 record
Evidence assessmentWhat is supported, uncertain or disputed in the current case model.9 claims
2Original
1Derivative
1Tree Only

Documented or strongly supported

No claims in this category have been formally assessed.

Working hypotheses and conflicts

No claims in this category have been formally assessed.

Research questionsOpen problems, missing bridges and the next records to inspect.0 open

No formal open question is recorded for this person.

Sources and provenanceStructured citations and source-quality classifications.4 sources
Technical profile and raw captureDataset metadata, machine dossier and captured WikiTree biography.Advanced

WikiTree profile information

Dataset: ONT_Glasco_2026-08-18T16_05.json · generated 2026-08-20

Machine-readable dossier

WikiTree biography, citations and relationship snapshot

Glasgow-1050 was captured 2026-08-19T09:47:48+00:00; WikiTree profile revision 2026-08-19.

Profile location claims

EventDateLocationStatus
birthDunaghy, Kilconway, AntrimWikiTree profile field
deathDunaghy, Kilconway, AntrimWikiTree profile field

Immediate relationship snapshot

RelationshipPersonWikiTree IDDates and places returned
ParentsJohn GlasgowGlasgow-10221751-00-00 · County Antrim, Ireland · 1852-00-00 · County Antrim, Ireland, United Kingdom
ParentsRose AlexanderAlexander-169671774-00-00 · 0000-00-00
ChildrenSamuel John GlasgowGlasgow-14191845-00-00 · Ireland · 0000-00-00
SiblingsSamuel GlasgowGlasgow-29081791-00-00 · County Londonderry, Ireland · 1875-08-17 · Lisnagaver, Rasharkin, County Antrim, Ireland
SiblingsJohn GlasgowGlasgow-8671801-00-00 · Rasharkin, Kilconway, Antrim · 0000-00-00
SiblingsGeorge GlasgowGlasgow-14001815-00-00 · County Antrim, Ireland · 0000-00-00
SiblingsNancy GlasgowGlasgow-13691815-00-00 · Dunaghy, Kilconway, Antrim · 1847-00-00
SiblingsEllen GlasgowGlasgow-13681825-00-00 · Dunaghy, Kilconway, Antrim · 0000-00-00

Profile categories

Estimated_Birth_Date Glasgow Name Study Glasgow_Name_Study

Record-bearing passages

  • Biography Andrew Glasgow was born about 1818 in County Antrim, Ireland. The detailed 1851 census return directly calls him a son of John Glasgow and records that Andrew was a thirty-year-old linen weaver who died of consumption in 1848. 1851 Irish Census Returns: detailed comma-delimited transcription (https://durrushistory.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/1851irishcensusreturnscommadelimitedtextfilejul24_071.pdf), Glenleslie household 21. The household also appears in the National Archives of Ireland's earlier online census presentation. National Archives of Ireland, 1851 census (http://www.census.nationalarchives.ie/pages/1851/Antrim/Kilconway/Dunaghy/Glenleslie/21/), Glenleslie household 21.
  • The return does not identify Andrew's mother. Rose Alexander was John's wife in 1851, but her reported age would make her about forty-seven when Andrew was born. She may have been his mother, but that relationship should remain uncertain. Research Notes Samuel John Glasgow is a strong probable son. Samuel's 1866 marriage names his father as Andrew Glasgow, labourer. General Register Office of Ireland, civil marriage register (https://www.irishgenealogy.ie/files/civil/marriage_returns/marriages_1866/11540/8244496.pdf), Samuel John Glasgow and Margaret Calagher, 21 August 1866. Samuel was born in County Antrim by about 1845, when Andrew was in his twenties. The certificate does not give Andrew's residence and no baptism has been found, so the attachment remains uncertain. Sources

Profile source citations

  1. 1851 Irish Census Returns: detailed comma-delimited transcription (https://durrushistory.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/1851irishcensusreturnscommadelimitedtextfilejul24_071.pdf), Glenleslie household 21. source link 1
  2. National Archives of Ireland, 1851 census (http://www.census.nationalarchives.ie/pages/1851/Antrim/Kilconway/Dunaghy/Glenleslie/21/), Glenleslie household 21. source link 1
  3. General Register Office of Ireland, civil marriage register (https://www.irishgenealogy.ie/files/civil/marriage_returns/marriages_1866/11540/8244496.pdf), Samuel John Glasgow and Margaret Calagher, 21 August 1866. source link 1
Full captured biography text
Biography
Andrew Glasgow was born about 1818 in County Antrim, Ireland. The detailed
1851 census return directly calls him a son of John Glasgow and
records that Andrew was a thirty-year-old linen weaver who died of consumption
in 1848. 1851 Irish Census Returns: detailed comma-delimited transcription (https://durrushistory.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/1851irishcensusreturnscommadelimitedtextfilejul24_071.pdf), Glenleslie household 21. 
The household also appears in the National Archives of Ireland's earlier
online census presentation. National Archives of Ireland, 1851 census (http://www.census.nationalarchives.ie/pages/1851/Antrim/Kilconway/Dunaghy/Glenleslie/21/), Glenleslie household 21. 

The return does not identify Andrew's mother. Rose Alexander
was John's wife in 1851, but her reported age would make her about forty-seven
when Andrew was born. She may have been his mother, but that relationship should
remain uncertain.
Research Notes
Samuel John Glasgow is a strong probable son. Samuel's 1866
marriage names his father as Andrew Glasgow, labourer. General Register Office of Ireland, civil marriage register (https://www.irishgenealogy.ie/files/civil/marriage_returns/marriages_1866/11540/8244496.pdf), Samuel John Glasgow and Margaret Calagher, 21 August 1866. Samuel was born in County Antrim by about 1845, when Andrew was in his twenties. The certificate does not give Andrew's residence and no baptism has been found, so the attachment remains uncertain.
Sources
Raw WikiTree biography markup
[[Category:Glasgow Name Study]]

{{Estimated Date}}

== Biography ==
'''Andrew Glasgow''' was born about 1818 in County Antrim, Ireland. The detailed
1851 census return directly calls him a son of [[Glasgow-1022|John Glasgow]] and
records that Andrew was a thirty-year-old linen weaver who died of consumption
in 1848.<ref name="Census1851">[https://durrushistory.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/1851irishcensusreturnscommadelimitedtextfilejul24_071.pdf ''1851 Irish Census Returns: detailed comma-delimited transcription''], Glenleslie household 21.</ref>
The household also appears in the National Archives of Ireland's earlier
online census presentation.<ref name="Census1851NAI">[http://www.census.nationalarchives.ie/pages/1851/Antrim/Kilconway/Dunaghy/Glenleslie/21/ National Archives of Ireland, 1851 census], Glenleslie household 21.</ref>

The return does not identify Andrew's mother. [[Alexander-16967|Rose Alexander]]
was John's wife in 1851, but her reported age would make her about forty-seven
when Andrew was born. She may have been his mother, but that relationship should
remain uncertain.

== Research Notes ==
[[Glasgow-1419|Samuel John Glasgow]] is a strong probable son. Samuel's 1866
marriage names his father as Andrew Glasgow, labourer.<ref name="SamuelMarriage">[https://www.irishgenealogy.ie/files/civil/marriage_returns/marriages_1866/11540/8244496.pdf General Register Office of Ireland, civil marriage register], Samuel John Glasgow and Margaret Calagher, 21 August 1866.</ref> Samuel was born in County Antrim by about 1845, when Andrew was in his twenties. The certificate does not give Andrew's residence and no baptism has been found, so the attachment remains uncertain.

== Sources ==
<references />