Glasgow Surname Project

Individual research record

Adam Glasgow

before 1794 – ?

Glasgow-1622 · 1 mapped association

County Antrim, Ireland→Death place unknown
View on mapOpen WikiTreeCompareReport a correction

At a glance

Identity & family

Tree links organise the family; documentary status still varies.

1Mapped records
2Close relations
2Evidence items
12Candidate leads
Birth
before 1794 · County Antrim, Ireland
Death
Not recorded · Place not recorded
Parents
Adam Glasgowuncertain
Spouses
Not recorded
Children
James Glasgow
Gender
Male
WikiTree
Glasgow-1622
Research clusters
Unassigned occurrence
Mapped descendants
1

Comparison context

These child positions and checks are the subject details used to rank possible parents below.

Naming sequence used by the parentage model

Paternal grandfather positionJames Glasgow (1813)
Maternal grandfather positionNot identifiable from dated child profiles
Maternal grandmother positionNot identifiable from dated child profiles
Paternal grandmother positionNot identifiable from dated child profiles

Known-position checks: 0 support · 0 conflict. Ordinals retain unnamed children and recognise reused names.

Relationship comparison

Potential parents or duplicates

Compare scored leads with the subject details above—not proof.

Higher-signal leadReview carefullyWeak lead

Possible fathers5 leads

Automated fit29/100
Weak Lead
Dates1751–1852Generationat most 43 years age gapRecorded placesCounty Antrim, Ireland · County Antrim, Ireland, United Kingdom · Carnbuck townland Loughguile parishIndependent clue breadth · 5Age · Broad Geography · Household · Rare Branch-Name Recurrence · Two-GenerationExisting-tree context (not an independent clue)Rare Sibling-Name PatternCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • candidate's birth is 62 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1813), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 43 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
  • same broad administrative area only (+1; not a locality match)

a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving)

Show complete scoring
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 43 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
  • candidate's birth is 62 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1813), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same broad administrative area only (+1; not a locality match)
  • subject's birth fits within the candidate's overall child-bearing span (1779–1825) (+3; children are not tied to one spouse)
  • candidate's other children share uncommon given names with the subject's recorded siblings: Nancy +3 (49 public profiles) (+3 total)
  • uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Adam +14 (15 public profiles; subject branch: Adam Glasgow; candidate branch: Adam Glasgow, Adam Glasgow; +2 repetition bonus) (+14 total)

Deductions and cautions: a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving)

Automated fit21/100
Weak Lead
Dates1766–1836Generationat most 28 years age gapRecorded placesCounty Antrim, Ireland · Cross, Ballymoney, County Antrim, Ireland, United Kingdom · Cross townland, Ballymoney parishIndependent clue breadth · 6Age · Broad Geography · Household · Rare Branch-Name Recurrence · Spouse · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • candidate's birth is 47 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1813), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • known spouse Jane (McClure) Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (21) at the subject's birth (+3)
  • a known child was born within 5 years of the subject (+1)

a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); candidate already has another child named Adam Dickie Glasgow (Glasgow-1781) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict)

Show complete scoring
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 28 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
  • candidate's birth is 47 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1813), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same broad administrative area only (+1; not a locality match)
  • a known child was born within 5 years of the subject (+1)
  • known spouse Jane (McClure) Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (21) at the subject's birth (+3)
  • uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Adam +12 (15 public profiles; subject branch: Adam Glasgow; candidate branch: Adam Dickie Glasgow) (+12 total)

Deductions and cautions: a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); candidate already has another child named Adam Dickie Glasgow (Glasgow-1781) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict)

Show 3 lower-scoring possible fathers
Automated fit16/100
Weak Lead
Dates1748–1812Generationat most 46 years age gapRecorded placesLarne, County Antrim, Ireland · County Antrim — exact locality unprovedIndependent clue breadth · 5Age · Broad Geography · Sex-Aware Ordered Naming · Spouse · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • candidate's birth is 65 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1813), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • known spouse Jane Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (44) at the subject's birth (+3)
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 46 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)

a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving)

Show complete scoring
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 46 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
  • candidate's birth is 65 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1813), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • weak broad-area overlap: antrim (+1; not a locality match)
  • known spouse Jane Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (44) at the subject's birth (+3)
  • candidate's name matches the first dated son James Glasgow, the expected father position for a male subject (+4; catalogue rarity 0, James in 224 profiles)

Deductions and cautions: a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving)

Automated fit13/100
Weak Lead
Dates1773–1831Generationat most 21 years age gapRecorded placesLarne, County Antrim, Ireland · County Antrim — exact locality unprovedIndependent clue breadth · 4Age · Broad Geography · Sex-Aware Ordered Naming · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • candidate's birth is 40 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1813), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 21 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
  • weak broad-area overlap: antrim (+1; not a locality match)

a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving)

Show complete scoring
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 21 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
  • candidate's birth is 40 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1813), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • weak broad-area overlap: antrim (+1; not a locality match)
  • candidate's name matches the first dated son James Glasgow, the expected father position for a male subject (+4; catalogue rarity 0, James in 224 profiles)

Deductions and cautions: a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving)

Automated fit10/100
Weak Lead
Dates1739–1831Generationat most 55 years age gapRecorded placesCounty Londonderry, Ireland · Pine Creek, Allegheny, Pennsylvania, United States · Portglenone — regional family-tradition referenceIndependent clue breadth · 4Age · Household · Spouse · Two-GenerationExisting-tree context (not an independent clue)Rare Sibling-Name PatternCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • candidate's birth is 74 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1813), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • a known child was born within 2 years of the subject (+3)
  • known spouse Sarah (Blair) Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (37) at the subject's birth (+3)

a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Show complete scoring
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 55 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
  • candidate's birth is 74 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1813), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • a known child was born within 2 years of the subject (+3)
  • known spouse Sarah (Blair) Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (37) at the subject's birth (+3)
  • candidate's other children share uncommon given names with the subject's recorded siblings: Alexander +3 (59 public profiles); Nancy +3 (49 public profiles) (+6 total)

Deductions and cautions: a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Possible mothers5 leads

Automated fit64/100
Moderate Lead
Dates1767–1833Generationat most 27 years age gapRecorded placesInishrush, Tamlaght O’Crilly, County Londonderry · St Nossonus — Tamlaght O'Crilly Lower graveyardIndependent clue breadth · 4Age · Broad Geography · Spouse-Specific Child Window · Two-GenerationExisting-tree context (not an independent clue)Exact Sibling Profiles · Parental Couple Structure · Sibling Parental CoupleSame-spouse child windowAdam GlasgowCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • candidate is already linked as parent of 3 exact subject sibling profiles (+24): James Glasgow, Eliza Glasgow, Nancy Glasgow
  • candidate's birth is 46 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1813), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • candidate is the spouse of the linked opposite-sex parent (+8; tree couple clue)

No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required

Show complete scoring
  • candidate is the spouse of the linked opposite-sex parent (+8; tree couple clue)
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 27 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
  • candidate's birth is 46 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1813), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • weak broad-area overlap: inishrush (+1; not a locality match)
  • subject birth boundary overlaps children attributed to the same parental couple (1790–1822) (+3; other parent Adam Glasgow)
  • candidate is already linked as parent of 3 exact subject sibling profiles (+24): James Glasgow, Eliza Glasgow, Nancy Glasgow
  • the candidate and the subject's linked father Adam Glasgow are jointly recorded as parents of 3 exact sibling profiles (+14; strong couple-structure clue)

Deductions and cautions: No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required

Automated fit24/100
Weak Lead
Dates1773–1858Generationat most 21 years age gapRecorded placesAntrim, County Antrim, Ireland · Racavan, County Antrim, Ireland · County Antrim — exact locality unprovedIndependent clue breadth · 5Age · Broad Geography · Household · Rare Branch-Name Recurrence · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • candidate's birth is 40 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1813), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • a known child was born within 5 years of the subject (+1)
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 21 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)

candidate already has another child named Adam Dickie Glasgow (Glasgow-1781) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict)

Show complete scoring
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 21 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
  • candidate's birth is 40 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1813), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • weak broad-area overlap: antrim (+1; not a locality match)
  • a known child was born within 5 years of the subject (+1)
  • uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Adam +12 (15 public profiles; subject branch: Adam Glasgow; candidate branch: Adam Dickie Glasgow) (+12 total)

Deductions and cautions: candidate already has another child named Adam Dickie Glasgow (Glasgow-1781) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict)

Show 3 lower-scoring possible mothers
Automated fit24/100
Weak Lead
Dates1757–1840Generationat most 37 years age gapRecorded placesIreland · Allegheny, Pennsylvania, United States · County Antrim — exact locality unprovedIndependent clue breadth · 4Age · Broad Geography · Household · Two-GenerationExisting-tree context (not an independent clue)Rare Sibling-Name PatternCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • candidate's birth is 56 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1813), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • a known child was born within 2 years of the subject (+3)
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 37 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)

No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required

Show complete scoring
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 37 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
  • candidate's birth is 56 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1813), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • weak broad-area overlap: antrim (+1; not a locality match)
  • a known child was born within 2 years of the subject (+3)
  • candidate's other children share uncommon given names with the subject's recorded siblings: Alexander +3 (59 public profiles); Nancy +3 (49 public profiles) (+6 total)

Deductions and cautions: No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required

Automated fit18/100
Weak Lead
Dates1750–?Generationat most 44 years age gapRecorded placesCounty Antrim — exact locality unprovedIndependent clue breadth · 4Age · Broad Geography · Sex-Aware Ordered Naming · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • candidate's birth is 63 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1813), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 44 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
  • weak broad-area overlap: antrim (+1; not a locality match)

No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required

Show complete scoring
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 44 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
  • candidate's birth is 63 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1813), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • weak broad-area overlap: antrim (+1; not a locality match)
  • a candidate spouse matches the first dated son James Glasgow, the expected father position (+3; James in 224 profiles)

Deductions and cautions: No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required

Automated fit10/100
Weak Lead
Dates1756–1807Generationat most 38 years age gapRecorded placesLondonderry, County Londonderry, Ireland · Adams County, Ohio, USA · County Londonderry — exact locality unprovedIndependent clue breadth · 3Age · Spouse-Specific Child Window · Two-GenerationExisting-tree context (not an independent clue)Rare Sibling-Name PatternSame-spouse child windowRobert GlasgowCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • candidate's birth is 57 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1813), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 38 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
  • subject birth boundary overlaps children attributed to the same parental couple (1776–1799) (+3; other parent Robert Glasgow)

same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Show complete scoring
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 38 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
  • candidate's birth is 57 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1813), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • subject birth boundary overlaps children attributed to the same parental couple (1776–1799) (+3; other parent Robert Glasgow)
  • candidate's other children share uncommon given names with the subject's recorded siblings: Nancy +3 (49 public profiles) (+3 total)

Deductions and cautions: same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

How parent leads are calculated

Automated leads use birth surnames—not married surnames—as parental eligibility, role-specific biological age limits, bounded and approximate-date uncertainty, household chronology, specific time-aware localities, mapped distance, tenancy succession, migration destinations and sex-aware Scottish naming positions across generations. People already attached as the subject's parents stay in the identity summary and are excluded from this alternative-candidate list, regardless of relationship confidence. The main calibration uses clues available on disconnected profiles; existing parent and sibling links are retained as comparison context rather than treated as transferable evidence. Common ordered names and grandparent-to-child echoes receive a small non-zero weight, so a John or James match can support several independent criteria without producing a lead alone. Rare names, repeated bearers and bundles across otherwise distinct branches receive substantially more weight according to catalogue frequency. An exact migration place is weighted by its rarity and repetition across both branches; a shared destination country is worth only one point. Extra weight is added only when at least three independent clue types converge: naming, locality, specific migration, household chronology or collateral networks. Sparse profiles retain a clearly labelled chronology-only fallback instead of disappearing. Countries, states, counties and research clusters do not count as a shared locality, and fallback, broad representative or kin-inferred coordinates are excluded from distance scoring. Shared descendant profiles are removed before branch-name comparison. A candidate already recorded as a parent-in-law is excluded. A confident or independently supported parent is treated as settled; uncertain and unassessed attachments remain open to alternative comparison. A different linked parent, an uncle/aunt or grandparent path, and a matching existing child profile prevent an alternative from being classified as a strong direct-parent lead until the underlying tree conflict or duplicate is resolved. Familiar forms such as Bessie are normalised. Surname remains an eligibility filter worth zero points.

Naming customs, shared farms and occupations are circumstantial. Children, spouses and collateral relatives may be missing, and tree-derived family networks are not independent evidence. Scores rank research leads; they do not prove parentage.

Same-name candidate

Adam GlasgowGlasgow-3373

Automated fit36/100
Similar Person
Dates1804–?PlacesPlaces not recordedParent comparisonNo shared parent is indexed
Why it may fit
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 10 (+10)
  • overlapping locality (+8)

uncertain father attachments differ (no deduction)

Full comparison detail
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 10 (+10)
  • overlapping locality (+8)

Conflicts: uncertain father attachments differ (no deduction)

Open side-by-side comparison

Same-name candidate

Adam GlasgowGlasgow-2605

Automated fit32/100
Similar Person
Dates1829–1880PlacesManchester, Lancashire, England, United Kingdom → Turakina, Rangitikei, Manawatū-whanganui, New ZealandParent comparisonNo shared parent is indexed
Why it may fit
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • matching child name: James Glasgow

record-derived birth estimates differ by 35; retained without deduction; uncertain father attachments differ (no deduction)

Full comparison detail
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • matching child name: James Glasgow

Conflicts: record-derived birth estimates differ by 35; retained without deduction; uncertain father attachments differ (no deduction)

Open side-by-side comparison
How duplicate leads are calculated

Dates are eligibility gates, not merely deductions: chronologically impossible people are excluded. Dates, places, spouses, parent certainty and children's profiles and names are then compared. A high score is a prompt to inspect records, not a merge recommendation.

Open only what you need

Research & records

Latest case researchThe current conclusion from the durable research case file.Updated

Current conclusion

Glasgow-1622

Adam is directly named as the father of James Glasgow in James's original 1851 marriage register. The record does not name James's mother, Adam's residence or Adam's own parents. James's Inishrush residence makes this Adam an important local collateral candidate for Alexander Glasgow-951, but no record yet proves that Adam was Alexander's father or that he was Adam Glasgow-3902's son.

This is nevertheless a record-defined second Adam, not merely an invented name. Target Adam Glasgow-3902 already had a gravestone-proved son James, born about 1794 and still living in 1878. The 1851 groom was a different James, born about 1812/13. It would be exceptionally implausible for the same father to have two simultaneously living sons both named James. The 1851 groom's father should therefore be represented separately from target Adam unless an original record is shown to be wrong.

The present 1780, County Antrim birth is not documentary evidence. The live profile describes the year as a guess, while the marriage establishes only that Adam was old enough to father a child born about 1812/13. His attachment as a son of Glasgow-3902 is chronologically coherent but remains unsupported.

The attachment is nevertheless the strongest of the proposed additional-son hypotheses for target Adam. Target Adam's 1831 Inishrush household contained three males, a coherent fit for elder Adam, his gravestone-proved son James and this younger Adam. Target Adam was the only Glasgow tithe occupier there in 1833, so an adult son could have lived or worked on the same holding without separate tithe liability; this Adam's proved son was later an Inishrush farmer. The fit is not unique and supplies no named relationship, so the edge must remain uncertain.

A final targeted public-web search for a death, will, probate abstract or newspaper notice naming this Adam with either elder Adam or son James found no new record. This is a bounded online negative, not evidence that no record once existed. The unresolved originals are MIC1C/15, D2594/1 and D1062/1/5.

Life and record timelineChronological mapped occurrences and their underlying sources.1 record
1851

Father named in son's marriage

Inishrush

James Glasgow of Inishrush named farmer Adam Glasgow as his father; the register does not state Adam's residence or identify him with Glasgow-3902.

Documentedderivative
Source and mapping detail

"Ireland Marriages, 1619–1898," database, FamilySearch (record FGC7-SDN (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:FGC7-SDN)), marriage of James Glasgow and Rosanna Barkley, 17 March 1851, Portglenone, County Antrim, Ireland; citing p. 153, line 89.

Candidate matched on record type, year; inspect before treating it as the underlying record.

Precision: Inferred family-location point

Case-file source findingsSource extracts and analysis regenerated from findings.md.1 section(s)

Source findings

Glasgow-1622

SourceFindingAssessment
IrishGenealogy marriage record and original registerOn 17 March 1851 James Glasgow, 38, bachelor and farmer of Inishrush, married Rosanna Barkley. He named his father as Adam Glasgow, farmer.Direct evidence that Adam was James's father. It does not identify Adam with Glasgow-3902, name James's mother, or state Adam's residence.
Same original register; Peter Barkley's 1854 marriagePeter Barkley witnessed the 1851 marriage. His own 1854 marriage names his father as Henry Barkley, farmer, matching Rosanna's father.Supports a Barkley-family witness, probably Rosanna's brother or close relative. It gives no Glasgow relationship or identifying fact about Adam.
Evidence assessmentWhat is supported, uncertain or disputed in the current case model.6 claims
1Derivative
1Tree Only

Documented or strongly supported

Adam Glasgow was recorded in Inishrush (1851).

proved1 linked evidence item

Father named in son's marriage

Working hypotheses and conflicts

No claims in this category have been formally assessed.

Case-file assessments

Relationship caution

Glasgow-1622

Alexander Glasgow-951 (born about 1811) and James Glasgow-1623 (born about 1812/13) are close in age. They could be brothers, cousins or unrelated namesakes within the wider Bann Valley network. Shared locality and chronology make the possibility worth testing, but do not justify attaching Alexander as Adam's son.

Research questionsOpen problems, missing bridges and the next records to inspect.4 open

Which records prove the subject's identity across events?

No current conclusion recorded.

Missing bridge: Not specified

Which original or indexed records identify the parents?

No current conclusion recorded.

Missing bridge: A contemporary record explicitly identifying the parent or parents.

Which spouses and children are directly supported by records?

No current conclusion recorded.

Missing bridge: Not specified

What conflicts or same-name conflations must be resolved?

No current conclusion recorded.

Missing bridge: Not specified

Sources and provenanceStructured citations and source-quality classifications.2 sources

Source or provenance: quality describes the record layer, not every conclusion drawn from it.

  1. derivative "Ireland Marriages, 1619–1898," database, FamilySearch (record FGC7-SDN (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:FGC7-SDN)), marriage of James Glasgow and Rosanna Barkley, 17 March 1851, Portglenone, County Antrim, Ireland; citing p. 153, line 89.
  2. tree_only WikiTree profile export for Glasgow-1622
Technical profile and raw captureDataset metadata, machine dossier and captured WikiTree biography.Advanced

WikiTree profile information

Dataset: ONT_Glasco_2026-08-18T16_05.json · generated 2026-08-20

Machine-readable dossier

WikiTree biography, citations and relationship snapshot

Glasgow-1622 was captured 2026-08-19T10:45:25+00:00; WikiTree profile revision 2026-08-19.

Profile location claims

EventDateLocationStatus
birth—County Antrim, IrelandWikiTree profile field

Immediate relationship snapshot

RelationshipPersonWikiTree IDDates and places returned
ParentsAdam GlasgowGlasgow-39021758-00-00 · 1844-06-30 · Tamlaght O'Crilly, County Londonderry, Ireland
ChildrenJames GlasgowGlasgow-16231813-00-00 · Portglenone, County Antrim, Ireland · 0000-00-00
SiblingsEliza GlasgowGlasgow-39061790-00-00 · Inishrush, Tamlaght O’Crilly, County Londonderry · 1816-00-00
SiblingsJames GlasgowGlasgow-39031794-00-00 · Inishrush, Tamlaght O’Crilly, County Londonderry · 1878-12-11
SiblingsNancy KyleGlasgow-39071822-00-00 · Inishrush, Tamlaght O’Crilly, County Londonderry · 0000-00-00

Record-bearing passages

  • Biography Adam Glasgow was born before 1794. This estimate assumes that he was at least 18 years old when his son James was born.
  • Adam was the father of James Glasgow. James was recorded as aged 38 when he married Rosanna Barkley, daughter of Henry Barkley, on 17 March 1851 at Portglenone, County Antrim, Ireland. His age places his birth between 18 March 1812 and 17 March 1813.

  • The marriage record names Adam Glasgow as James’s father. Sources

Profile source citations

  1. "Ireland Marriages, 1619–1898," database, FamilySearch (record FGC7-SDN (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:FGC7-SDN)), marriage of James Glasgow and Rosanna Barkley, 17 March 1851, Portglenone, County Antrim, Ireland; citing p. 153, line 89. source link 1
Full captured biography text
Biography
Adam Glasgow was born before 1794. This estimate assumes that he was at least 18 years old when his son James was born.

Adam was the father of James Glasgow. James was recorded as aged 38 when he married Rosanna Barkley, daughter of Henry Barkley, on 17 March 1851 at Portglenone, County Antrim, Ireland. His age places his birth between 18 March 1812 and 17 March 1813.

The marriage record names Adam Glasgow as James’s father.
Sources
* "Ireland Marriages, 1619–1898," database, FamilySearch (record FGC7-SDN (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:FGC7-SDN)), marriage of James Glasgow and Rosanna Barkley, 17 March 1851, Portglenone, County Antrim, Ireland; citing p. 153, line 89.
Raw WikiTree biography markup
== Biography ==
Adam Glasgow was born before 1794. This estimate assumes that he was at least 18 years old when his son James was born.

Adam was the father of James Glasgow. James was recorded as aged 38 when he married Rosanna Barkley, daughter of Henry Barkley, on 17 March 1851 at Portglenone, County Antrim, Ireland. His age places his birth between 18 March 1812 and 17 March 1813.

The marriage record names Adam Glasgow as James’s father.

== Sources == 
<references />

* "Ireland Marriages, 1619–1898," database, FamilySearch ([https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:FGC7-SDN record FGC7-SDN]), marriage of James Glasgow and Rosanna Barkley, 17 March 1851, Portglenone, County Antrim, Ireland; citing p. 153, line 89.