Mary Unknown appears in the family catalogue. The supplied vital locations are Calliaqua, Saint George, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines.
No parents named in the supplied model.
Relationship labels belong to each link. Partners are not assumed to be parents of every child.
No entries of this type are dated in the supplied material.
Dated assessments, source transcriptions and earlier working notes remain available in full. Where those disagree, use the current conclusion above and inspect its reasoning.
No separately maintained research assessment in this snapshot. The available records are preserved below.
Calliaqua, Saint George, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
One-Tree export profile fields are search leads, not sources; relationships are shown only where the export supplies parent links.
WikiTree profile export for Unknown-695642
No sufficiently specific citation match found.
Precision: Country-centre fallback for profile locality
No claims in this category have been formally assessed.
No claims in this category have been formally assessed.
No formal open question is recorded for this person.
Source or provenance: quality describes the record layer, not every conclusion drawn from it.
Preserved imported material. It may include superseded assertions; the current display assessment is shown at the top of this dossier.
At a glance
Tree links organise the family; documentary status still varies.
Comparison context
These child positions and checks are the subject details used to rank possible parents below.
Naming sequence used by the parentage model
Known-position checks: 0 support · 2 conflict. Ordinals retain unnamed children and recognise reused names.
Relationship comparison
Compare scored leads with the subject details above—not proof.
Possible Mother
locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)
Deductions and cautions: locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)
Possible Mother
locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)
Deductions and cautions: locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)
Possible Mother
locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)
Deductions and cautions: locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)
Possible Mother
locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction); candidate's household recorded James Glasgow in Inishrush, Tamlaght O’Crilly, County Londonderry within 1 years of the subject (−12; no contemporaneous child is indexed in the subject's locality)
Deductions and cautions: locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction); candidate's household recorded James Glasgow in Inishrush, Tamlaght O’Crilly, County Londonderry within 1 years of the subject (−12; no contemporaneous child is indexed in the subject's locality)
Possible Mother
locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)
Deductions and cautions: locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)
Automated leads use birth surnames—not married surnames—as parental eligibility, role-specific biological age limits, bounded and approximate-date uncertainty, household chronology, specific time-aware localities, mapped distance, tenancy succession, migration destinations and sex-aware Scottish naming positions across generations. People already attached as the subject's parents stay in the identity summary and are excluded from this alternative-candidate list, regardless of relationship confidence. The main calibration uses clues available on disconnected profiles; existing parent and sibling links are retained as comparison context rather than treated as transferable evidence. Common ordered names and grandparent-to-child echoes receive a small non-zero weight, so a John or James match can support several independent criteria without producing a lead alone. Rare names, repeated bearers and bundles across otherwise distinct branches receive substantially more weight according to catalogue frequency. An exact migration place is weighted by its rarity and repetition across both branches; a shared destination country is worth only one point. Extra weight is added only when at least three independent clue types converge: naming, locality, specific migration, household chronology or collateral networks. Sparse profiles retain a clearly labelled chronology-only fallback instead of disappearing. Countries, states, counties and research clusters do not count as a shared locality, and fallback, broad representative or kin-inferred coordinates are excluded from distance scoring. Shared descendant profiles are removed before branch-name comparison. A candidate already recorded as a parent-in-law is excluded. A confident or independently supported parent is treated as settled; uncertain and unassessed attachments remain open to alternative comparison. A different linked parent, an uncle/aunt or grandparent path, and a matching existing child profile prevent an alternative from being classified as a strong direct-parent lead until the underlying tree conflict or duplicate is resolved. Familiar forms such as Bessie are normalised. Surname remains an eligibility filter worth zero points.
Naming customs, shared farms and occupations are circumstantial. Children, spouses and collateral relatives may be missing, and tree-derived family networks are not independent evidence. Scores rank research leads; they do not prove parentage.
No sufficiently similar same-name person is currently indexed.
Dates are eligibility gates, not merely deductions: chronologically impossible people are excluded. Dates, places, spouses, parent certainty and children's profiles and names are then compared. A high score is a prompt to inspect records, not a merge recommendation.
Mary Unknown
Updated 2026-08-26
Dataset: ONT_Glasco_2026-08-18T16_05.json · generated 2026-09-08
Unknown-695642 was captured 2026-09-07T21:05:55+00:00; WikiTree profile revision 2026-08-26.
| Event | Date | Location | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| birth | — | Calliaqua, Saint George, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | WikiTree profile field |
| Relationship | Person | WikiTree ID | Dates and places returned |
|---|---|---|---|
| Children | Adam Glasgow | Glasgow-2959 | 1810-00-00 · Calliaqua, Saint George, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines · 0000-00-00 |
| Children | Eve Glasgow | Glasgow-2960 | 1812-00-00 · Calliaqua, Saint George, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines · 0000-00-00 |
| Children | Peter Glasgow | Glasgow-2961 | 1815-00-00 · Calliaqua, Saint George, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines · 0000-00-00 |
| Children | James Glasgow | Glasgow-2962 | 1816-00-00 · Calliaqua, Saint George, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines · 0000-00-00 |
| Spouses | John Glasgow | Glasgow-2952 | 1780-00-00 · 1817-09-00 · Calliaqua, Saint George, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines · 0000-00-00 |
Unsourced_Profiles
No structured source citation was recoverable from the profile biography.
Biography Mary was born about 1795. Sources
{{Unsourced}}
== Biography ==
Mary was born about 1795.
== Sources ==
<references />Original exports stay unchanged. The public display uses explicitly approved decisions where available.