Didup James 1674

James Glasgow

HOLD — compatible profile linked — James Glasgow in Didup is named in the 11 June 1674 Irvine inquest for Robert Hunter of Hunterstoun. The subject and older draft describe the same occurrence. Glasgow-3105, Glasgow-3969, Glasgow-3172, Glasgow-3971, Glasgow-3107 and Glasgow-1496 all remain plausible; the extract gives no age, occupation or kin. Consolidate the queue work and preserve the six candidates. The attempted independent book download failed, so no new original inspection is claimed.

Record fields: Recorded name James Glasgow; surname Glasgow as written; born before 1674, exact date unknown; birthplace unknown; cited locations describe recorded events; death unknown unless expressly recorded below. Family/occupation fields are limited to the names and roles in the cited record account.

The 11 June 1674 Irvine inquest for Robert Hunter of Hunterstoun’s service as heir includes James Glasgow in Didup. Shaw, Some Family Papers of the Hunters of Hunterston, printed p.62 entry89

Compatible WikiTree candidates

• Glasgow-3105 — Current public profile compared; Didup James is an adult in the 11 June 1674 Irvine inquest. Glasgow-3969 has only a BEFORE 1670 adulthood estimate from a 1691 Beith marriage, so it remains compatible with being adult in 1674. Glasgow-3172 is a shipmaster of the Blessing of Saltcoats in 1667, a substantive north-Ayrshire coastal association absent from the old generic comparison; Belfast maritime work does not conflict with an Irvine inquest. The Glasgow 1645 child 3971, Polwarth husband 3107 and Campbeltown father 1496 are also chronological possibilities. The inquest supplies no age, occupation or kin to distinguish them. Glasgow-3105 is a particularly relevant Kilwinning candidate. Its current biography explicitly withdraws 1670 as a documented birth: it is only an adult-status estimate from fatherhood in 1689. An older birth compatible with the 1674 adult inquest is permitted; remove the old too-young exclusion. Profile birth 1670-00-00, death 0000-00-00; qualifiers retained in the review.
• Glasgow-3969 — Current public profile compared; Didup James is an adult in the 11 June 1674 Irvine inquest. Glasgow-3969 has only a BEFORE 1670 adulthood estimate from a 1691 Beith marriage, so it remains compatible with being adult in 1674. Glasgow-3172 is a shipmaster of the Blessing of Saltcoats in 1667, a substantive north-Ayrshire coastal association absent from the old generic comparison; Belfast maritime work does not conflict with an Irvine inquest. The Glasgow 1645 child 3971, Polwarth husband 3107 and Campbeltown father 1496 are also chronological possibilities. The inquest supplies no age, occupation or kin to distinguish them. Glasgow-3105 is a particularly relevant Kilwinning candidate. Its current biography explicitly withdraws 1670 as a documented birth: it is only an adult-status estimate from fatherhood in 1689. An older birth compatible with the 1674 adult inquest is permitted; remove the old too-young exclusion. Profile birth 1670-00-00, death 0000-00-00; qualifiers retained in the review.
• Glasgow-3172 — Current public profile compared; Didup James is an adult in the 11 June 1674 Irvine inquest. Glasgow-3969 has only a BEFORE 1670 adulthood estimate from a 1691 Beith marriage, so it remains compatible with being adult in 1674. Glasgow-3172 is a shipmaster of the Blessing of Saltcoats in 1667, a substantive north-Ayrshire coastal association absent from the old generic comparison; Belfast maritime work does not conflict with an Irvine inquest. The Glasgow 1645 child 3971, Polwarth husband 3107 and Campbeltown father 1496 are also chronological possibilities. The inquest supplies no age, occupation or kin to distinguish them. Glasgow-3105 is a particularly relevant Kilwinning candidate. Its current biography explicitly withdraws 1670 as a documented birth: it is only an adult-status estimate from fatherhood in 1689. An older birth compatible with the 1674 adult inquest is permitted; remove the old too-young exclusion. Profile birth 1640-00-00, death 1679-11-08; qualifiers retained in the review.
• Glasgow-3971 — Current public profile compared; Didup James is an adult in the 11 June 1674 Irvine inquest. Glasgow-3969 has only a BEFORE 1670 adulthood estimate from a 1691 Beith marriage, so it remains compatible with being adult in 1674. Glasgow-3172 is a shipmaster of the Blessing of Saltcoats in 1667, a substantive north-Ayrshire coastal association absent from the old generic comparison; Belfast maritime work does not conflict with an Irvine inquest. The Glasgow 1645 child 3971, Polwarth husband 3107 and Campbeltown father 1496 are also chronological possibilities. The inquest supplies no age, occupation or kin to distinguish them. Glasgow-3105 is a particularly relevant Kilwinning candidate. Its current biography explicitly withdraws 1670 as a documented birth: it is only an adult-status estimate from fatherhood in 1689. An older birth compatible with the 1674 adult inquest is permitted; remove the old too-young exclusion. Profile birth 1645-11-25, death 0000-00-00; qualifiers retained in the review.
• Glasgow-3107 — Current public profile compared; Didup James is an adult in the 11 June 1674 Irvine inquest. Glasgow-3969 has only a BEFORE 1670 adulthood estimate from a 1691 Beith marriage, so it remains compatible with being adult in 1674. Glasgow-3172 is a shipmaster of the Blessing of Saltcoats in 1667, a substantive north-Ayrshire coastal association absent from the old generic comparison; Belfast maritime work does not conflict with an Irvine inquest. The Glasgow 1645 child 3971, Polwarth husband 3107 and Campbeltown father 1496 are also chronological possibilities. The inquest supplies no age, occupation or kin to distinguish them. Glasgow-3105 is a particularly relevant Kilwinning candidate. Its current biography explicitly withdraws 1670 as a documented birth: it is only an adult-status estimate from fatherhood in 1689. An older birth compatible with the 1674 adult inquest is permitted; remove the old too-young exclusion. Profile birth 1645-00-00, death 0000-00-00; qualifiers retained in the review.
• Glasgow-1496 — Current public profile compared; Didup James is an adult in the 11 June 1674 Irvine inquest. Glasgow-3969 has only a BEFORE 1670 adulthood estimate from a 1691 Beith marriage, so it remains compatible with being adult in 1674. Glasgow-3172 is a shipmaster of the Blessing of Saltcoats in 1667, a substantive north-Ayrshire coastal association absent from the old generic comparison; Belfast maritime work does not conflict with an Irvine inquest. The Glasgow 1645 child 3971, Polwarth husband 3107 and Campbeltown father 1496 are also chronological possibilities. The inquest supplies no age, occupation or kin to distinguish them. Glasgow-3105 is a particularly relevant Kilwinning candidate. Its current biography explicitly withdraws 1670 as a documented birth: it is only an adult-status estimate from fatherhood in 1689. An older birth compatible with the 1674 adult inquest is permitted; remove the old too-young exclusion. Profile birth 1650-00-00, death 0000-00-00; qualifiers retained in the review.

Next identity test: Compare the linked compatible profiles with the cited record household. Keep the candidates linked while identification remains qualified; do not create a duplicate from missing fields.

[[Category:Glasgow Name Study]]
== Biography ==
The 11 June 1674 Irvine inquest for Robert Hunter of Hunterstoun’s service as heir includes James Glasgow in Didup.<ref>Shaw, Some Family Papers of the Hunters of Hunterston, printed p.62 entry89; https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3Q9M-CSM7-J962-6. Documented review range22–23 September2026; exact discovery day is not recorded. Printed retour extract inspected; underlying original uninspected. FamilySearch’s Linlithgow1546–1564 title is a catalogue mismatch. The extract gives James no age, trade, relatives or vital date.</ref>

== Research Notes ==
James Glasgow in Didup is named in the 11 June 1674 Irvine inquest for Robert Hunter of Hunterstoun. The subject and older draft describe the same occurrence. Glasgow-3105, Glasgow-3969, Glasgow-3172, Glasgow-3971, Glasgow-3107 and Glasgow-1496 all remain plausible; the extract gives no age, occupation or kin. Consolidate the queue work and preserve the six candidates. The attempted independent book download failed, so no new original inspection is claimed.
Candidate profiles: [[Glasgow-3105]], [[Glasgow-3969]], [[Glasgow-3172]], [[Glasgow-3971]], [[Glasgow-3107]], [[Glasgow-1496]].
Compare the linked compatible profiles with the cited record household. Keep the candidates linked while identification remains qualified; do not create a duplicate from missing fields.

== Sources ==
<references />