Skip to page content
Glasgow archive/Lisnagaver Macaw Kilpatrick 1839
Catalogue · 27 Sep 2026

People in the records

Lisnagaver Macaw Kilpatrick 1839

Sourced record accounts and possible profile identifications. Names in different events are compared together where compatible; HOLD means that identity or original-record checks remain before creating or merging profiles.

Latest findings · People catalogue

Hugh Macaw

HOLD — no compatible profile established — No compatible infant profile was identified through Hugh Macaw/McCaw/McCaughan searches. McCaw-10 represents the father of John, born about 1833. McCaw-233 represents an adult born about 1812 and father of Eliza, born about 1832. These are older generations, not the 1839 infant. The freshly inspected published baptism transcription, row 125, gives birth on 3 February 1839 and baptism on 3 March, whereas the maintained handoff gave 5 February. The original image is still needed to settle the date. Consolidate Hugh and Jane Matilda with the same named parental couple. Rereading the transcription gives 3 February 1839, with the manuscript still uninspected. Parent profile identities remain uncertain; later spouses alone do not exclude an earlier family.

Record fields: Name Hugh Macaw; birthplace unknown. Birth date remains unknown unless explicitly stated in the record facts below. No compatible infant profile was identified through Hugh Macaw/McCaw/McCaughan searches. McCaw-10 represents the father of John, born about 1833. McCaw-233 represents an adult born about 1812 and father of Eliza, born about 1832. These are older generations, not the 1839 infant. The freshly inspected published baptism transcription, row 125, gives birth on 3 February 1839 and baptism on 3 March, whereas the maintained handoff gave 5 February. The original image is still needed to settle the date. Consolidate Hugh and Jane Matilda with the same named parental couple. Rereading the transcription gives 3 February 1839, with the manuscript still uninspected. Parent profile identities remain uncertain; later spouses alone do not exclude an earlier family.

A fresh audit of the surviving Rasharkin Presbyterian baptism transcription located a second parent-bearing McCaughern/Macaw household at the target townland. Hugh Macaw was born 3 February 1839 and baptised 3 March 1839 as the son of William and Mary Kilpatrick, resident at Lisnagaver (entry 125). Rasharkin Presbyterian baptisms, entries 125 and 204

Rereading Rasharkin baptism transcription entry 125 gives Hugh Macaw’s birth as 3 February 1839, replacing the maintained 5 February wording. His baptism remains 3 March 1839; original manuscript inspection is required before treating the corrected transcription as a final date. Rasharkin Presbyterian baptism transcription

Matches by record
  • new-17sep-8621efc1a6c2 — No compatible infant profile was identified through Hugh Macaw/McCaw/McCaughan searches. McCaw-10 represents the father of John, born about 1833. McCaw-233 represents an adult born about 1812 and father of Eliza, born about 1832. These are older generations, not the 1839 infant. The freshly inspected published baptism transcription, row 125, gives birth on 3 February 1839 and baptism on 3 March, whereas the maintained handoff gave 5 February. The original image is still needed to settle the date. Consolidate Hugh and Jane Matilda with the same named parental couple. Rereading the transcription gives 3 February 1839, with the manuscript still uninspected. Parent profile identities remain uncertain; later spouses alone do not exclude an earlier family.
  • irish-macaw-hugh-transcription-date-correction — No compatible infant profile was identified through Hugh Macaw/McCaw/McCaughan searches. McCaw-10 represents the father of John, born about 1833. McCaw-233 represents an adult born about 1812 and father of Eliza, born about 1832. These are older generations, not the 1839 infant. The freshly inspected published baptism transcription, row 125, gives birth on 3 February 1839 and baptism on 3 March, whereas the maintained handoff gave 5 February. The original image is still needed to settle the date. Consolidate Hugh and Jane Matilda with the same named parental couple. Rereading the transcription gives 3 February 1839, with the manuscript still uninspected. Parent profile identities remain uncertain; later spouses alone do not exclude an earlier family.
Duplicate check and relationship limits
  • Public existing-profile search and biography review completed 2026-09-30. Missing fields or an unproved extra bridge do not exclude a compatible person.
  • Represents the father of John, born about 1833, which is incompatible with Hugh's own birth in 1839.
  • Represents an adult born about 1812 and father of Eliza, born about 1832; a different generation from the 1839 infant.
  • Further source and existing-profile review completed 2026-09-30; retain compatible candidates unless a concrete conflict excludes them.

Next identity test: Inspect the named original record and compare dated family evidence; retained candidates remain unproved.

Complete sourced WikiTree draft
== Biography ==

A fresh audit of the surviving Rasharkin Presbyterian baptism transcription located a second parent-bearing McCaughern/Macaw household at the target townland. Hugh Macaw was born 3 February 1839 and baptised 3 March 1839 as the son of William and Mary Kilpatrick, resident at Lisnagaver (entry 125).<ref>Rasharkin Presbyterian baptisms, entries 125 and 204; https://genealogy.torrens.org/BannValley/church/RasharkinP/Baptisms_1834.html; . The same register records Jane Matilda Macaw, born 26 July 1843 and baptised 14 January 1844, as the daughter of William and Mary Kilpatrick at Granagh (entry 204). Named transcription reread 30 September 2026; originalmanuscriptuninspected.</ref>

Rereading Rasharkin baptism transcription entry 125 gives Hugh Macaw’s birth as 3 February 1839, replacing the maintained 5 February wording. His baptism remains 3 March 1839; original manuscript inspection is required before treating the corrected transcription as a final date.<ref>Rasharkin Presbyterian baptism transcription; https://genealogy.torrens.org/BannValley/church/RasharkinP/Baptisms_1834.html; transcription entries 125 and 204; original MIC/1P/292 uninspected. Named transcription reread; original manuscript uninspected.</ref>

== Research Notes ==

No compatible infant profile was identified through Hugh Macaw/McCaw/McCaughan searches. McCaw-10 represents the father of John, born about 1833. McCaw-233 represents an adult born about 1812 and father of Eliza, born about 1832. These are older generations, not the 1839 infant. The freshly inspected published baptism transcription, row 125, gives birth on 3 February 1839 and baptism on 3 March, whereas the maintained handoff gave 5 February. The original image is still needed to settle the date. Consolidate Hugh and Jane Matilda with the same named parental couple. Rereading the transcription gives 3 February 1839, with the manuscript still uninspected. Parent profile identities remain uncertain; later spouses alone do not exclude an earlier family.

Possible profile identities: none established within the recorded searches.

Next research: Inspect the named original record and compare dated family evidence; retained candidates remain unproved.

== Sources ==

<references />

William Macaw

HOLD — compatible profile linked — McCaw-443, born about 1818 in Londonderry and later a Presbyterian minister with Sarah in 1861, and McCaw-216, born in 1821 in Ireland and married to Elizabeth Jane Werden about 1845 in Canada, could chronologically have fathered a child in 1839. A later different wife is not an exclusion without continuous marriage evidence. Both are weak comparisons, without a Lisnagaver connection to named wife Mary Kilpatrick. The Antrim Williams born in 1840 and 1865 cannot be the 1839 father. Consolidate Hugh and Jane Matilda with the same named parental couple. Rereading the transcription gives 3 February 1839, with the manuscript still uninspected. Parent profile identities remain uncertain; later spouses alone do not exclude an earlier family.

Record fields: Name William Macaw; birthplace unknown. Birth date remains unknown unless explicitly stated in the record facts below. McCaw-443, born about 1818 in Londonderry and later a Presbyterian minister with Sarah in 1861, and McCaw-216, born in 1821 in Ireland and married to Elizabeth Jane Werden about 1845 in Canada, could chronologically have fathered a child in 1839. A later different wife is not an exclusion without continuous marriage evidence. Both are weak comparisons, without a Lisnagaver connection to named wife Mary Kilpatrick. The Antrim Williams born in 1840 and 1865 cannot be the 1839 father. Consolidate Hugh and Jane Matilda with the same named parental couple. Rereading the transcription gives 3 February 1839, with the manuscript still uninspected. Parent profile identities remain uncertain; later spouses alone do not exclude an earlier family.

A fresh audit of the surviving Rasharkin Presbyterian baptism transcription located a second parent-bearing McCaughern/Macaw household at the target townland. Hugh Macaw was born 3 February 1839 and baptised 3 March 1839 as the son of William and Mary Kilpatrick, resident at Lisnagaver (entry 125). Rasharkin Presbyterian baptisms, entries 125 and 204

Rereading Rasharkin baptism transcription entry 125 gives Hugh Macaw’s birth as 3 February 1839, replacing the maintained 5 February wording. His baptism remains 3 March 1839; original manuscript inspection is required before treating the corrected transcription as a final date. Rasharkin Presbyterian baptism transcription

Compatible WikiTree candidates

  • McCaw-443 — Current public profile compared; McCaw-443, born about 1818 in Londonderry and later a Presbyterian minister with Sarah in 1861, and McCaw-216, born in 1821 in Ireland and married to Elizabeth Jane Werden about 1845 in Canada, could chronologically have fathered a child in 1839. A later different wife is not an exclusion without continuous marriage evidence. Both are weak comparisons, without a Lisnagaver connection to named wife Mary Kilpatrick. The Antrim Williams born in 1840 and 1865 cannot be the 1839 father. Profile birth 1818-00-00, death 1902-12-29; qualifiers retained in the review.
  • McCaw-216 — Current public profile compared; McCaw-443, born about 1818 in Londonderry and later a Presbyterian minister with Sarah in 1861, and McCaw-216, born in 1821 in Ireland and married to Elizabeth Jane Werden about 1845 in Canada, could chronologically have fathered a child in 1839. A later different wife is not an exclusion without continuous marriage evidence. Both are weak comparisons, without a Lisnagaver connection to named wife Mary Kilpatrick. The Antrim Williams born in 1840 and 1865 cannot be the 1839 father. Profile birth 1821-11-09, death 1903-12-03; qualifiers retained in the review.
Matches by record
  • new-17sep-8621efc1a6c2 — McCaw-443, born about 1818 in Londonderry and later a Presbyterian minister with Sarah in 1861, and McCaw-216, born in 1821 in Ireland and married to Elizabeth Jane Werden about 1845 in Canada, could chronologically have fathered a child in 1839. A later different wife is not an exclusion without continuous marriage evidence. Both are weak comparisons, without a Lisnagaver connection to named wife Mary Kilpatrick. The Antrim Williams born in 1840 and 1865 cannot be the 1839 father. Consolidate Hugh and Jane Matilda with the same named parental couple. Rereading the transcription gives 3 February 1839, with the manuscript still uninspected. Parent profile identities remain uncertain; later spouses alone do not exclude an earlier family. McCaw-443, McCaw-216
  • irish-macaw-hugh-transcription-date-correction — McCaw-443, born about 1818 in Londonderry and later a Presbyterian minister with Sarah in 1861, and McCaw-216, born in 1821 in Ireland and married to Elizabeth Jane Werden about 1845 in Canada, could chronologically have fathered a child in 1839. A later different wife is not an exclusion without continuous marriage evidence. Both are weak comparisons, without a Lisnagaver connection to named wife Mary Kilpatrick. The Antrim Williams born in 1840 and 1865 cannot be the 1839 father. Consolidate Hugh and Jane Matilda with the same named parental couple. Rereading the transcription gives 3 February 1839, with the manuscript still uninspected. Parent profile identities remain uncertain; later spouses alone do not exclude an earlier family. McCaw-443, McCaw-216
Duplicate check and relationship limits
  • Public existing-profile search and biography review completed 2026-09-30. Missing fields or an unproved extra bridge do not exclude a compatible person.
  • Born about 1840, after the child's birth in 1839.
  • Born about 1865, after the child's birth in 1839.
  • A continuing William/Jane Gilmour family, with Scottish children in 1825–1838 and an 1841 household, distinct from William and Mary Kilpatrick.
  • Further source and existing-profile review completed 2026-09-30; retain compatible candidates unless a concrete conflict excludes them.

Next identity test: Inspect the named original record and compare dated family evidence; retained candidates remain unproved.

Complete sourced WikiTree draft
== Biography ==

A fresh audit of the surviving Rasharkin Presbyterian baptism transcription located a second parent-bearing McCaughern/Macaw household at the target townland. Hugh Macaw was born 3 February 1839 and baptised 3 March 1839 as the son of William and Mary Kilpatrick, resident at Lisnagaver (entry 125).<ref>Rasharkin Presbyterian baptisms, entries 125 and 204; https://genealogy.torrens.org/BannValley/church/RasharkinP/Baptisms_1834.html; . The same register records Jane Matilda Macaw, born 26 July 1843 and baptised 14 January 1844, as the daughter of William and Mary Kilpatrick at Granagh (entry 204). Named transcription reread 30 September 2026; originalmanuscriptuninspected.</ref>

Rereading Rasharkin baptism transcription entry 125 gives Hugh Macaw’s birth as 3 February 1839, replacing the maintained 5 February wording. His baptism remains 3 March 1839; original manuscript inspection is required before treating the corrected transcription as a final date.<ref>Rasharkin Presbyterian baptism transcription; https://genealogy.torrens.org/BannValley/church/RasharkinP/Baptisms_1834.html; transcription entries 125 and 204; original MIC/1P/292 uninspected. Named transcription reread; original manuscript uninspected.</ref>

== Research Notes ==

McCaw-443, born about 1818 in Londonderry and later a Presbyterian minister with Sarah in 1861, and McCaw-216, born in 1821 in Ireland and married to Elizabeth Jane Werden about 1845 in Canada, could chronologically have fathered a child in 1839. A later different wife is not an exclusion without continuous marriage evidence. Both are weak comparisons, without a Lisnagaver connection to named wife Mary Kilpatrick. The Antrim Williams born in 1840 and 1865 cannot be the 1839 father. Consolidate Hugh and Jane Matilda with the same named parental couple. Rereading the transcription gives 3 February 1839, with the manuscript still uninspected. Parent profile identities remain uncertain; later spouses alone do not exclude an earlier family.

Possible profile identities: [[McCaw-443]], [[McCaw-216]].

Next research: Inspect the named original record and compare dated family evidence; retained candidates remain unproved.

== Sources ==

<references />

Mary Kilpatrick

HOLD — compatible profile linked — Kilpatrick-3023 represents Mary, born about 1820 and died in 1870, associated with Larne/Antrim. Her age is compatible with motherhood in 1839; she had a Glenarm child John Black in 1866 by John Black. A later Black relationship does not exclude an earlier Macaw family, and no earlier marital history is documented. Retain her as a weak candidate. The nearer Kilrea Mary Kilpatrick-2163 has a continuing family with William White, married in 1828, distinct from the 1839 William Macaw couple. Consolidate Hugh and Jane Matilda with the same named parental couple. Rereading the transcription gives 3 February 1839, with the manuscript still uninspected. Parent profile identities remain uncertain; later spouses alone do not exclude an earlier family.

Record fields: Name Mary Kilpatrick; birthplace unknown. Birth date remains unknown unless explicitly stated in the record facts below. Kilpatrick-3023 represents Mary, born about 1820 and died in 1870, associated with Larne/Antrim. Her age is compatible with motherhood in 1839; she had a Glenarm child John Black in 1866 by John Black. A later Black relationship does not exclude an earlier Macaw family, and no earlier marital history is documented. Retain her as a weak candidate. The nearer Kilrea Mary Kilpatrick-2163 has a continuing family with William White, married in 1828, distinct from the 1839 William Macaw couple. Consolidate Hugh and Jane Matilda with the same named parental couple. Rereading the transcription gives 3 February 1839, with the manuscript still uninspected. Parent profile identities remain uncertain; later spouses alone do not exclude an earlier family.

A fresh audit of the surviving Rasharkin Presbyterian baptism transcription located a second parent-bearing McCaughern/Macaw household at the target townland. Hugh Macaw was born 3 February 1839 and baptised 3 March 1839 as the son of William and Mary Kilpatrick, resident at Lisnagaver (entry 125). Rasharkin Presbyterian baptisms, entries 125 and 204

Rereading Rasharkin baptism transcription entry 125 gives Hugh Macaw’s birth as 3 February 1839, replacing the maintained 5 February wording. His baptism remains 3 March 1839; original manuscript inspection is required before treating the corrected transcription as a final date. Rasharkin Presbyterian baptism transcription

Compatible WikiTree candidates

  • Kilpatrick-3023 — Current public profile compared; Kilpatrick-3023 represents Mary, born about 1820 and died in 1870, associated with Larne/Antrim. Her age is compatible with motherhood in 1839; she had a Glenarm child John Black in 1866 by John Black. A later Black relationship does not exclude an earlier Macaw family, and no earlier marital history is documented. Retain her as a weak candidate. The nearer Kilrea Mary Kilpatrick-2163 has a continuing family with William White, married in 1828, distinct from the 1839 William Macaw couple. Profile birth 1820-00-00, death 1870-00-00; qualifiers retained in the review.
Matches by record
  • new-17sep-8621efc1a6c2 — Kilpatrick-3023 represents Mary, born about 1820 and died in 1870, associated with Larne/Antrim. Her age is compatible with motherhood in 1839; she had a Glenarm child John Black in 1866 by John Black. A later Black relationship does not exclude an earlier Macaw family, and no earlier marital history is documented. Retain her as a weak candidate. The nearer Kilrea Mary Kilpatrick-2163 has a continuing family with William White, married in 1828, distinct from the 1839 William Macaw couple. Consolidate Hugh and Jane Matilda with the same named parental couple. Rereading the transcription gives 3 February 1839, with the manuscript still uninspected. Parent profile identities remain uncertain; later spouses alone do not exclude an earlier family. Kilpatrick-3023
  • irish-macaw-hugh-transcription-date-correction — Kilpatrick-3023 represents Mary, born about 1820 and died in 1870, associated with Larne/Antrim. Her age is compatible with motherhood in 1839; she had a Glenarm child John Black in 1866 by John Black. A later Black relationship does not exclude an earlier Macaw family, and no earlier marital history is documented. Retain her as a weak candidate. The nearer Kilrea Mary Kilpatrick-2163 has a continuing family with William White, married in 1828, distinct from the 1839 William Macaw couple. Consolidate Hugh and Jane Matilda with the same named parental couple. Rereading the transcription gives 3 February 1839, with the manuscript still uninspected. Parent profile identities remain uncertain; later spouses alone do not exclude an earlier family. Kilpatrick-3023
Duplicate check and relationship limits
  • Public existing-profile search and biography review completed 2026-09-30. Missing fields or an unproved extra bridge do not exclude a compatible person.
  • Born in 1841, after the child's birth in 1839.
  • Born about 1840, after the child's birth in 1839.
  • Further source and existing-profile review completed 2026-09-30; retain compatible candidates unless a concrete conflict excludes them.

Next identity test: Inspect the named original record and compare dated family evidence; retained candidates remain unproved.

Complete sourced WikiTree draft
== Biography ==

A fresh audit of the surviving Rasharkin Presbyterian baptism transcription located a second parent-bearing McCaughern/Macaw household at the target townland. Hugh Macaw was born 3 February 1839 and baptised 3 March 1839 as the son of William and Mary Kilpatrick, resident at Lisnagaver (entry 125).<ref>Rasharkin Presbyterian baptisms, entries 125 and 204; https://genealogy.torrens.org/BannValley/church/RasharkinP/Baptisms_1834.html; . The same register records Jane Matilda Macaw, born 26 July 1843 and baptised 14 January 1844, as the daughter of William and Mary Kilpatrick at Granagh (entry 204). Named transcription reread 30 September 2026; originalmanuscriptuninspected.</ref>

Rereading Rasharkin baptism transcription entry 125 gives Hugh Macaw’s birth as 3 February 1839, replacing the maintained 5 February wording. His baptism remains 3 March 1839; original manuscript inspection is required before treating the corrected transcription as a final date.<ref>Rasharkin Presbyterian baptism transcription; https://genealogy.torrens.org/BannValley/church/RasharkinP/Baptisms_1834.html; transcription entries 125 and 204; original MIC/1P/292 uninspected. Named transcription reread; original manuscript uninspected.</ref>

== Research Notes ==

Kilpatrick-3023 represents Mary, born about 1820 and died in 1870, associated with Larne/Antrim. Her age is compatible with motherhood in 1839; she had a Glenarm child John Black in 1866 by John Black. A later Black relationship does not exclude an earlier Macaw family, and no earlier marital history is documented. Retain her as a weak candidate. The nearer Kilrea Mary Kilpatrick-2163 has a continuing family with William White, married in 1828, distinct from the 1839 William Macaw couple. Consolidate Hugh and Jane Matilda with the same named parental couple. Rereading the transcription gives 3 February 1839, with the manuscript still uninspected. Parent profile identities remain uncertain; later spouses alone do not exclude an earlier family.

Possible profile identities: [[Kilpatrick-3023]].

Next research: Inspect the named original record and compare dated family evidence; retained candidates remain unproved.

== Sources ==

<references />

Saved people and pages

Select 2 people to compare their evidence.