Glasgow Surname Project

Individual research record

Thomas Newlands Glasgow

c. 1820 – ?

Glasgow-1358 · 1 mapped association

GlasgowDeath place unknown

At a glance

Identity & family

Tree links organise the family; documentary status still varies.

1Mapped records
6Close relations
3Evidence items
12Candidate leads
Birth
c. 1820 · Glasgow
Death
Not recorded · Place not recorded
Parents
John GlasgowunmarkedJean (Bryce) Glasgowunmarked
Spouses
Margaret NewlandsMary Mcfarlane
Children
Elizabeth Locke GlasgowMary Ann Glasgow
Gender
Male
WikiTree
Glasgow-1358
Research clusters
Scotland One-Tree profile leads
Mapped descendants
2

Comparison context

These child positions and checks are the subject details used to rank possible parents below.

Naming sequence used by the parentage model

Paternal grandfather positionNot identifiable from dated child profiles
Maternal grandfather positionNot identifiable from dated child profiles
Maternal grandmother positionElizabeth Locke Glasgow (1853)
Paternal grandmother positionMary Ann Glasgow (1860)

Known-position checks: 0 support · 0 conflict. Ordinals retain unnamed children and recognise reused names.

Relationship comparison

Potential parents or duplicates

Compare scored leads with the subject details above—not proof.

Higher-signal leadReview carefullyWeak lead

Possible fathers5 leads

Automated fit33/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1790–1833Generation30 years age gapRecorded placesGovan, Renfrewshire, Scotland · Govan, Renfrewshire, Scotland, United KingdomIndependent clue breadth · 6Age · Birth-Order Gap · Local Same-Spouse Child Window · Spouse · Spouse-Specific Child Window · Two-GenerationExisting-tree context (not an independent clue)Rare Sibling-Name PatternSame-spouse child windowJean (Cunningham) GlasgowCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 30-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 63 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1853), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • known spouse Jean (Cunningham) Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (22) at the subject's birth (+3)

a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 30-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 63 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1853), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1815–1831) (+6; other parent Jean (Cunningham) Glasgow)
  • same-couple children Elizabeth Glasgow (1819) and Lillias Glasgow (1828) bracket the subject in the same specific birth locality (+10; strong household-placement clue, not proof)
  • the subject fills a 9-year gap between those same-couple, same-locality children (+4; corroborated missing birth-order slot)
  • known spouse Jean (Cunningham) Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (22) at the subject's birth (+3)
  • candidate's other children share uncommon given names with the subject's recorded siblings: Jean +3 (42 public profiles) (+3 total)

Deductions and cautions: a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Automated fit32/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1795–?Generation25 years age gapRecorded placesPatrick, Lanarkshire, Scotland · Glasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland, United Kingdom · Lanarkshire — exact locality unprovedIndependent clue breadth · 6Age · Local Sibling Birth · Spouse · Spouse-Specific Child Window · Two-Generation · Undated LocalitySame-spouse child windowElizabeth (Campbell) GlasgowCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 25-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • known spouse Elizabeth (Campbell) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (23) at the subject's birth (+7)
  • candidate has only broad or undated birth-locality overlap: glasgow (+6)

a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 25-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 58 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1853), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • candidate has only broad or undated birth-locality overlap: glasgow (+6)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1818–1836) (+6; other parent Elizabeth (Campbell) Glasgow)
  • candidate has another child, Samuel Glasgow, born 2 years from the subject in the same specific birth locality (+6; possible sibling-household clue)
  • known spouse Elizabeth (Campbell) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (23) at the subject's birth (+7)

Deductions and cautions: a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15)

Show 3 lower-scoring possible fathers
Automated fit26/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1786–1843Generation34 years age gapRecorded placesKirkliston, West Lothian, Scotland · Aberlady, East Lothian, Scotland, United Kingdom · Linlithgowshire / West Lothian — exact locality unprovedIndependent clue breadth · 4Age · Same-Sex Generational Naming · Spouse · Two-GenerationExisting-tree context (not an independent clue)Rare Sibling-Name PatternCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 34-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 67 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1853), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • known spouse Euphemia (Burns) Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (24) at the subject's birth (+3)

a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 34-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 67 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1853), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • known spouse Euphemia (Burns) Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (24) at the subject's birth (+3)
  • candidate and subject share the given name Thomas (+4; weak direct parent-child name recurrence, 86 public profiles)
  • candidate's other children share uncommon given names with the subject's recorded siblings: Peter +12 (11 public profiles) (+12 total)

Deductions and cautions: a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Automated fit19/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1784–?Generation36 years age gapRecorded placesGlasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland · GlasgowIndependent clue breadth · 7Age · Contemporaneous Household Conflict · Household · Local Sibling Birth · Spouse · Two-Generation · Undated LocalityCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 36-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate is associated with the subject's stated birthplace, but not by a reliable near-contemporary record (+10)
  • known spouse Janet (Gilmour) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (26) at the subject's birth (+7)

a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); candidate's household recorded Alexander Glasgow in Calton, Lanarkshire, Scotland, United Kingdom within 7 years of the subject (−12; no contemporaneous child is indexed in the subject's locality)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 36-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 69 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1853), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • candidate is associated with the subject's stated birthplace, but not by a reliable near-contemporary record (+10)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • subject's birth fits within the candidate's overall child-bearing span (1809–1832) (+3; children are not tied to one spouse)
  • candidate has another child, Janet Glasgow, born 8 years from the subject in the same specific birth locality (+4; possible sibling-household clue)
  • known spouse Janet (Gilmour) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (26) at the subject's birth (+7)

Deductions and cautions: a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); candidate's household recorded Alexander Glasgow in Calton, Lanarkshire, Scotland, United Kingdom within 7 years of the subject (−12; no contemporaneous child is indexed in the subject's locality)

Automated fit17/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1795–1850Generation25 years age gapRecorded placesIreland · Hingham, Plymouth, Massachusetts, United States · Ireland — exact locality unprovedIndependent clue breadth · 4Age · Sex-Aware Ordered Naming · Spouse · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 25-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • known spouse Mary (Unknown) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (20) at the subject's birth (+7)
  • candidate's birth is 58 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1853), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)

a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 25-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 58 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1853), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • known spouse Mary (Unknown) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (20) at the subject's birth (+7)
  • a candidate spouse matches the second dated daughter Mary Ann Glasgow, the expected mother position (+3; Mary in 254 profiles)

Deductions and cautions: a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Possible mothers5 leads

Automated fit40/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1798–?Generation22 years age gapRecorded placesGlasgowIndependent clue breadth · 6Age · Birth-Order Gap · Local Same-Spouse Child Window · Spouse-Specific Child Window · Two-Generation · Undated LocalityExisting-tree context (not an independent clue)Rare Sibling-Name PatternSame-spouse child windowJames GlasgowCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 22-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate is associated with the subject's stated birthplace, but not by a reliable near-contemporary record (+10)
  • candidate's birth is 55 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1853), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)

a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 22-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 55 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1853), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • candidate is associated with the subject's stated birthplace, but not by a reliable near-contemporary record (+10)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1815–1831) (+6; other parent James Glasgow)
  • same-couple children Elizabeth Glasgow (1819) and Lillias Glasgow (1828) bracket the subject in the same specific birth locality (+10; strong household-placement clue, not proof)
  • the subject fills a 9-year gap between those same-couple, same-locality children (+4; corroborated missing birth-order slot)
  • candidate's other children share uncommon given names with the subject's recorded siblings: Jean +3 (42 public profiles) (+3 total)

Deductions and cautions: a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15)

Automated fit25/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1797–1852Generation23 years age gapRecorded placesPatrick, Lanarkshire, Scotland · Glasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland, United Kingdom · Lanarkshire — exact locality unprovedIndependent clue breadth · 5Age · Local Sibling Birth · Spouse-Specific Child Window · Two-Generation · Undated LocalitySame-spouse child windowJohn GlasgowCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 23-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate has only broad or undated birth-locality overlap: glasgow (+6)
  • candidate's birth is 56 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1853), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)

a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 23-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 56 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1853), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • candidate has only broad or undated birth-locality overlap: glasgow (+6)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1818–1836) (+6; other parent John Glasgow)
  • candidate has another child, Samuel Glasgow, born 2 years from the subject in the same specific birth locality (+6; possible sibling-household clue)

Deductions and cautions: a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15)

Show 3 lower-scoring possible mothers
Automated fit22/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1783–1871Generation37 years age gapRecorded placesBlackburn, West Lothian, Scotland · Bridgeton, Glasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland, United Kingdom · Linlithgowshire / West Lothian — exact locality unprovedIndependent clue breadth · 5Age · Indirect Multi-Factor Convergence · Sex-Aware Ordered Naming · Two-Generation · Undated LocalityCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 37-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate has only broad or undated birth-locality overlap: glasgow (+6)
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming

a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 37-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 70 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1853), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • candidate has only broad or undated birth-locality overlap: glasgow (+6)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • candidate's name matches the second dated daughter Mary Ann Glasgow, the expected mother position for a male subject (+4; catalogue rarity 0, Mary in 254 profiles)
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming

Deductions and cautions: a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15)

Automated fit19/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1796–1848Generation24 years age gapRecorded placesScotland · Aberlady, East Lothian, Scotland · Scotland — exact locality unprovedIndependent clue breadth · 2Age · Two-GenerationExisting-tree context (not an independent clue)Rare Sibling-Name PatternCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 24-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 57 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1853), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)

a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 24-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 57 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1853), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • candidate's other children share uncommon given names with the subject's recorded siblings: Peter +12 (11 public profiles) (+12 total)

Deductions and cautions: a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Automated fit17/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1792–?Generation28 years age gapRecorded placesGlasgow, Scotland · GlasgowIndependent clue breadth · 3Age · Two-Generation · Undated LocalityCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 28-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate is associated with the subject's stated birthplace, but not by a reliable near-contemporary record (+10)
  • candidate's birth is 61 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1853), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)

a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 28-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 61 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1853), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • candidate is associated with the subject's stated birthplace, but not by a reliable near-contemporary record (+10)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)

Deductions and cautions: a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15)

How parent leads are calculated

Automated leads use birth surnames—not married surnames—as parental eligibility, role-specific biological age limits, bounded and approximate-date uncertainty, household chronology, specific time-aware localities, mapped distance, tenancy succession, migration destinations and sex-aware Scottish naming positions across generations. People already attached as the subject's parents stay in the identity summary and are excluded from this alternative-candidate list, regardless of relationship confidence. The main calibration uses clues available on disconnected profiles; existing parent and sibling links are retained as comparison context rather than treated as transferable evidence. Common ordered names and grandparent-to-child echoes receive a small non-zero weight, so a John or James match can support several independent criteria without producing a lead alone. Rare names, repeated bearers and bundles across otherwise distinct branches receive substantially more weight according to catalogue frequency. An exact migration place is weighted by its rarity and repetition across both branches; a shared destination country is worth only one point. Extra weight is added only when at least three independent clue types converge: naming, locality, specific migration, household chronology or collateral networks. Sparse profiles retain a clearly labelled chronology-only fallback instead of disappearing. Countries, states, counties and research clusters do not count as a shared locality, and fallback, broad representative or kin-inferred coordinates are excluded from distance scoring. Shared descendant profiles are removed before branch-name comparison. A candidate already recorded as a parent-in-law is excluded. A confident or independently supported parent is treated as settled; uncertain and unassessed attachments remain open to alternative comparison. A different linked parent, an uncle/aunt or grandparent path, and a matching existing child profile prevent an alternative from being classified as a strong direct-parent lead until the underlying tree conflict or duplicate is resolved. Familiar forms such as Bessie are normalised. Surname remains an eligibility filter worth zero points.

Naming customs, shared farms and occupations are circumstantial. Children, spouses and collateral relatives may be missing, and tree-derived family networks are not independent evidence. Scores rank research leads; they do not prove parentage.

Same-name candidate

Thomas W. GlasgowGlasgow-678

Automated fit43/100
Similar Person
Dates1822–1894PlacesIreland, United Kingdom → Hadley, Hampshire, Massachusetts, United StatesParent comparisonNo shared parent is indexed
Why it may fit
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 2 (+25)

No indexed conflict

Full comparison detail
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 2 (+25)

Conflicts: No indexed conflict

Same-name candidate

Thomas GlasgowGlasgow-34

Automated fit40/100
Similar Person
Dates1832–1884PlacesEdinburgh → EdinburghParent comparisonNo shared parent is indexed
Why it may fit
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 12 (+2)
  • same spouse name (+20)

No indexed conflict

Full comparison detail
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 12 (+2)
  • same spouse name (+20)

Conflicts: No indexed conflict

How duplicate leads are calculated

Dates are eligibility gates, not merely deductions: chronologically impossible people are excluded. Dates, places, spouses, parent certainty and children's profiles and names are then compared. A high score is a prompt to inspect records, not a merge recommendation.

Open only what you need

Research & records

Life and record timelineChronological mapped occurrences and their underlying sources.1 record
b. 1820

Profile-stated birthplace: Glasgow

Glasgow

One-Tree export profile fields are search leads, not sources; relationships are shown only where the export supplies parent links.

One-Tree profile leadunknown
Source and mapping detail

WikiTree profile export for Glasgow-1358

No sufficiently specific citation match found.

Precision: Country-centre fallback for profile locality

Evidence assessmentWhat is supported, uncertain or disputed in the current case model.12 claims
2Tree Only
1Derivative

Documented or strongly supported

No claims in this category have been formally assessed.

Working hypotheses and conflicts

No claims in this category have been formally assessed.

Research questionsOpen problems, missing bridges and the next records to inspect.0 open

No formal open question is recorded for this person.

Sources and provenanceStructured citations and source-quality classifications.3 sources

Source or provenance: quality describes the record layer, not every conclusion drawn from it.

  1. tree_only https://www.familysearch.org/tree/person/details/KCP8-3SZ
  2. derivative https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:QLN6-QPPS
  3. tree_only WikiTree profile export for Glasgow-1358
Technical profile and raw captureDataset metadata, machine dossier and captured WikiTree biography.Advanced

WikiTree profile information

Dataset: ONT_Glasco_2026-08-18T16_05.json · generated 2026-08-20

Machine-readable dossier

WikiTree biography, citations and relationship snapshot

Glasgow-1358 was captured 2026-08-07T09:54:35+00:00; WikiTree profile revision 2024-09-21.

Profile location claims

EventDateLocationStatus
birthGlasgowWikiTree profile field
marriage1845-02-07Glasgow, Lanarkshire, ScotlandWikiTree relationship field
marriage1866-04-17EdinburghWikiTree relationship field

Immediate relationship snapshot

RelationshipPersonWikiTree IDDates and places returned
ParentsJohn GlasgowGlasgow-14601790-00-00 · Canongate, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland · 0000-00-00
ParentsJean GlasgowBryce-10751790-00-00 · 0000-00-00
ChildrenElizabeth Locke GlasgowGlasgow-14111853-02-20 · Glasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland, United Kingdom · 1857-03-20 · Calton, Lanarkshire, Scotland
ChildrenMary Ann GlasgowGlasgow-30731860-00-00 · 0000-00-00
SiblingsPeter GlasgowGlasgow-14611808-03-18 · Canongate, Edinburghshire, Scotland, United Kingdom · 0000-00-00
SiblingsJohn GlasgowGlasgow-14641810-04-10 · Edinburgh, Edinburghshire, Scotland, United Kingdom · 0000-00-00
SiblingsElizabeth GlasgowGlasgow-14651812-03-24 · Edinburgh, Edinburghshire, Scotland, United Kingdom · 0000-00-00
SiblingsWilliam GlasgowGlasgow-14631816-02-25 · Edinburgh, Edinburghshire, Scotland, United Kingdom · 0000-00-00
SiblingsJean GlasgowGlasgow-14621818-05-24 · Edinburgh, Edinburghshire, Scotland, United Kingdom · 0000-00-00
SpousesMaryMcfarlane-25941820-00-00 · 0000-00-00 · 1845-02-07 · Glasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland
SpousesMargaretNewlands-6361820-00-00 · 0000-00-00 · 1866-04-17 · Edinburgh

Record-bearing passages

Profile source citations

  1. https://www.familysearch.org/tree/person/details/KCP8-3SZ source link 1
  2. https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:QLN6-QPPS source link 1
Full captured biography text
Biography
Thomas was born about 1820.
Sources
* https://www.familysearch.org/tree/person/details/KCP8-3SZ
* https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:QLN6-QPPS
Raw WikiTree biography markup
== Biography ==
Thomas was born about 1820.
== Sources ==
<references />
* https://www.familysearch.org/tree/person/details/KCP8-3SZ
* https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:QLN6-QPPS