Glasgow Surname Project

Individual research record

Samuel Andrew Jackson Glasgow

c. 1831 – 1898

Glasgow-2277 · 1 mapped association

North Carolina, United StatesDeath place unknown

At a glance

Identity & family

Tree links organise the family; documentary status still varies.

1Mapped records
13Close relations
6Evidence items
18Candidate leads
Birth
c. 1831 · North Carolina, United States
Death
1898 · Place not recorded
Parents
Not recorded
Spouses
Rebecca (Butts) Glasgow
Children
Affie GlasgowAndrew Simeon GlasgowAnna GlasgowCharley GlasgowEliza GlasgowGeorge GlasgowLavina GlasgowMoses GlasgowNannie GlasgowPattie GlasgowSandy GlasgowSarah Glasgow
Gender
Male
WikiTree
Glasgow-2277
Research clusters
Worldwide One-Tree profile leads
Mapped descendants
13

Comparison context

These child positions and checks are the subject details used to rank possible parents below.

Naming sequence used by the parentage model

Paternal grandfather positionCharley Glasgow (1857)
Maternal grandfather positionAndrew Simeon Glasgow (1868)
Maternal grandmother positionSarah Glasgow (1859)
Paternal grandmother positionPattie Glasgow (1861)

Known-position checks: 0 support · 3 conflict. Ordinals retain unnamed children and recognise reused names.

Relationship comparison

Potential parents or duplicates

Compare scored leads with the subject details above—not proof.

Higher-signal leadReview carefullyWeak lead

Possible fathers5 leads

Automated fit42/100
Moderate Lead
Dates1795–1860Generation36 years age gapRecorded placesCookstown, County Tyrone, Ireland · Hamilton, Martin, North Carolina, United States · CookstownIndependent clue breadth · 6Age · Household · Local Sibling Birth · Spouse · Two-Generation · Undated LocalityCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 36-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • known spouse Nancy (Coburn) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (31) at the subject's birth (+7)
  • candidate has only broad or undated birth-locality overlap: north (+6)

No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 36-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 62 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1857), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • candidate has only broad or undated birth-locality overlap: north (+6)
  • a known child was born within 3 years of the subject (+3)
  • candidate has another child, Edward William Glasgow, born 7 years from the subject in the same specific birth locality (+4; possible sibling-household clue)
  • known spouse Nancy (Coburn) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (31) at the subject's birth (+7)

Deductions and cautions: No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required

Automated fit40/100
Moderate Lead
Dates1794–1835Generation37 years age gapRecorded placesCurrituck, North Carolina, United States · Stewart, Tennessee, United States · Currituck, North Carolina, USAIndependent clue breadth · 7Age · Contemporaneous Household Conflict · Household · Indirect Multi-Factor Convergence · Rare Branch-Name Recurrence · Two-Generation · Undated LocalityCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 37-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate has only broad or undated birth-locality overlap: north (+6)
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming

candidate's household recorded Mary Catherine Glasgow in Of, Stewart, Tennessee, United States within 2 years of the subject (−12; no contemporaneous child is indexed in the subject's locality)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 37-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 63 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1857), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • candidate has only broad or undated birth-locality overlap: north (+6)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • subject's birth fits within the candidate's overall child-bearing span (1821–1833) (+3; children are not tied to one spouse)
  • uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Nannie +16 (3 public profiles; subject branch: Nannie Glasgow; candidate branch: Nannie M Glasgow) (+16 total)
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming

Deductions and cautions: candidate's household recorded Mary Catherine Glasgow in Of, Stewart, Tennessee, United States within 2 years of the subject (−12; no contemporaneous child is indexed in the subject's locality)

Show 3 lower-scoring possible fathers
Automated fit39/100
Weak Lead
Dates1810–?Generation21 years age gapRecorded placesSouth Carolina, United States · South CarolinaIndependent clue breadth · 6Age · Broad Geography · Household · Rare Branch-Name Recurrence · Spouse · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 21-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • known spouse Mary Caroline (Thompson) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (18) at the subject's birth (+7)
  • candidate's birth is 47 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1857), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)

No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 21-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 47 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1857), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • weak broad-area overlap: carolina (+1; not a locality match)
  • a known child was born within 8 years of the subject (+1)
  • known spouse Mary Caroline (Thompson) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (18) at the subject's birth (+7)
  • uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Eliza +8 (23 public profiles; subject branch: Eliza Glasgow; candidate branch: Eliza A Glasgow) (+8 total)

Deductions and cautions: No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required

Automated fit37/100
Weak Lead
Dates1799–1875Generation32 years age gapRecorded placesRockbridge, Virginia, United States · Promise City, Wayne, Iowa, United StatesIndependent clue breadth · 7Age · Contemporaneous Household Conflict · Rare Branch-Name Recurrence · Rare Name Bundle · Spouse · Spouse-Specific Child Window · Two-GenerationSame-spouse child windowMary (McNeil) GlasgowCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 32-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • known spouse Sarah (Lyle) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (29) at the subject's birth (+7)
  • candidate's birth is 58 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1857), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)

same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10); candidate's household recorded John Nelson Glasgow in Adams, Ohio, United States within 1 years of the subject (−12; no contemporaneous child is indexed in the subject's locality); candidate already has another child named Samuel Lyle Glasgow (Glasgow-192) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 32-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 58 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1857), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1818–1834) (+6; other parent Mary (McNeil) Glasgow)
  • known spouse Sarah (Lyle) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (29) at the subject's birth (+7)
  • uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Clyde +16 (3 public profiles; subject branch: Clyde Gaslon Glasgow; candidate branch: Clyde Mandard Glasgow); Eliza +8 (23 public profiles; subject branch: Eliza Glasgow; candidate branch: Eliza Jane (Glasgow) McNeil) (+28 total including +4 multi-name bonus)

Deductions and cautions: same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10); candidate's household recorded John Nelson Glasgow in Adams, Ohio, United States within 1 years of the subject (−12; no contemporaneous child is indexed in the subject's locality); candidate already has another child named Samuel Lyle Glasgow (Glasgow-192) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict)

Automated fit37/100
Weak Lead
Dates1790–?Generation41 years age gapRecorded placesCurrituck, North Carolina, United States · Halifax, North Carolina, United States · Currituck, North Carolina, USAIndependent clue breadth · 5Age · Indirect Multi-Factor Convergence · Same-Sex Generational Naming · Two-Generation · Undated LocalityCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 41-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate has only broad or undated birth-locality overlap: north (+6)
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming

No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 41-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 67 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1857), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • candidate has only broad or undated birth-locality overlap: north (+6)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • candidate and subject share the given name Samuel (+4; weak direct parent-child name recurrence, 79 public profiles)
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming

Deductions and cautions: No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required

Possible mothers5 leads

Automated fit34/100
Weak Lead
Dates1792–1848Generation39 years age gapRecorded placesWake County, North Carolina, United States · Weakley County, Tennessee, United StatesIndependent clue breadth · 5Age · Household · Local Sibling Birth · Two-Generation · Undated LocalityCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 39-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate has only broad or undated birth-locality overlap: north (+6)
  • candidate's birth is 65 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1857), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)

No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 39-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 65 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1857), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • candidate has only broad or undated birth-locality overlap: north (+6)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • another recorded child shares the subject's birth year (+2; possible twins or date uncertainty)
  • candidate has another child, Susan Caroline Glasgow, born 6 years from the subject in the same specific birth locality (+4; possible sibling-household clue)

Deductions and cautions: No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required

Automated fit31/100
Weak Lead
Dates1802–1863Generation29 years age gapRecorded placesNewberry, South Carolina, United StatesIndependent clue breadth · 4Age · Broad Geography · Collateral Naming · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 29-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 55 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1857), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • weak broad-area overlap: carolina (+1; not a locality match)

No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 29-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 55 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1857), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • weak broad-area overlap: carolina (+1; not a locality match)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • candidate's sibling and niece/nephew network repeats names in the subject's descendant line (three rarest at most): Eliza +8 (23 public profiles; niece/nephew Eliza A Glasgow) (+8 total)

Deductions and cautions: No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required

Show 3 lower-scoring possible mothers
Automated fit29/100
Weak Lead
Dates1800–?Generation31 years age gapRecorded placesCookstownIndependent clue breadth · 4Age · Household · Local Sibling Birth · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 31-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 57 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1857), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • a known child was born within 3 years of the subject (+3)

locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 31-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 57 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1857), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • a known child was born within 3 years of the subject (+3)
  • candidate has another child, Edward William Glasgow, born 7 years from the subject in the same specific birth locality (+4; possible sibling-household clue)

Deductions and cautions: locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Automated fit28/100
Weak Lead
Dates1808–1894Generation23 years age gapRecorded placesBakerstown, Richland Township, Allegheny, Pennsylvania, United States · Freeport, Armstrong, Pennsylvania, United StatesIndependent clue breadth · 3Age · Collateral Naming · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 23-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 49 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1857), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)

same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 23-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 49 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1857), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • candidate's sibling and niece/nephew network repeats names in the subject's descendant line (three rarest at most): Moses +16 (2 public profiles; sibling Moses Thomas Glasgow) (+16 total)

Deductions and cautions: same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Automated fit28/100
Weak Lead
Dates1792–1860Generation39 years age gapRecorded placesPine Creek, Allegheny, Pennsylvania, United StatesIndependent clue breadth · 3Age · Collateral Naming · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 39-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 65 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1857), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)

same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 39-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 65 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1857), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • candidate's sibling and niece/nephew network repeats names in the subject's descendant line (three rarest at most): Moses +16 (2 public profiles; niece/nephew Moses Thomas Glasgow) (+16 total)

Deductions and cautions: same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

How parent leads are calculated

Automated leads use birth surnames—not married surnames—as parental eligibility, role-specific biological age limits, bounded and approximate-date uncertainty, household chronology, specific time-aware localities, mapped distance, tenancy succession, migration destinations and sex-aware Scottish naming positions across generations. People already attached as the subject's parents stay in the identity summary and are excluded from this alternative-candidate list, regardless of relationship confidence. The main calibration uses clues available on disconnected profiles; existing parent and sibling links are retained as comparison context rather than treated as transferable evidence. Common ordered names and grandparent-to-child echoes receive a small non-zero weight, so a John or James match can support several independent criteria without producing a lead alone. Rare names, repeated bearers and bundles across otherwise distinct branches receive substantially more weight according to catalogue frequency. An exact migration place is weighted by its rarity and repetition across both branches; a shared destination country is worth only one point. Extra weight is added only when at least three independent clue types converge: naming, locality, specific migration, household chronology or collateral networks. Sparse profiles retain a clearly labelled chronology-only fallback instead of disappearing. Countries, states, counties and research clusters do not count as a shared locality, and fallback, broad representative or kin-inferred coordinates are excluded from distance scoring. Shared descendant profiles are removed before branch-name comparison. A candidate already recorded as a parent-in-law is excluded. A confident or independently supported parent is treated as settled; uncertain and unassessed attachments remain open to alternative comparison. A different linked parent, an uncle/aunt or grandparent path, and a matching existing child profile prevent an alternative from being classified as a strong direct-parent lead until the underlying tree conflict or duplicate is resolved. Familiar forms such as Bessie are normalised. Surname remains an eligibility filter worth zero points.

Naming customs, shared farms and occupations are circumstantial. Children, spouses and collateral relatives may be missing, and tree-derived family networks are not independent evidence. Scores rank research leads; they do not prove parentage.

Automated fit72/100
Similar Person
Dates1831–1896PlacesArmagh, County Armagh, Ireland, United Kingdom → County Armagh, Ireland, United KingdomParent comparisonNo shared parent is indexed
Why it may fit
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • same birth year (+30)
  • death years within 2 (+10)

No indexed conflict

Full comparison detail
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • same birth year (+30)
  • death years within 2 (+10)
  • matching child name: Sarah Glasgow

Conflicts: No indexed conflict

Same-name candidate

Samuel GlasgowGlasgow-2526

Automated fit53/100
Similar Person
Dates1831–1902PlacesCounty Tyrone, Ireland, United Kingdom → Belfast, Ireland, United KingdomParent comparisonNo shared parent is indexed
Why it may fit
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • same birth year (+30)
  • death years within 4 (+5)

No indexed conflict

Full comparison detail
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • same birth year (+30)
  • death years within 4 (+5)

Conflicts: No indexed conflict

Automated fit47/100
Similar Person
Dates1830–1906PlacesBrush Creek Township, Adams, Ohio, United States → Seattle, King, Washington, United StatesParent comparisonNo shared parent is indexed
Why it may fit
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 1 (+25)
  • child given-name pattern overlaps: Anna, Eliza

No indexed conflict

Full comparison detail
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 1 (+25)
  • child given-name pattern overlaps: Anna, Eliza

Conflicts: No indexed conflict

Same-name candidate

Samuel GlasgowGlasgow-3827

Automated fit43/100
Similar Person
Dates1833–?PlacesPennsylvania, United StatesParent comparisonNo shared parent is indexed
Why it may fit
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 2 (+25)

No indexed conflict

Full comparison detail
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 2 (+25)

Conflicts: No indexed conflict

Show 4 lower-scoring duplicate lead(s)

Same-name candidate

Samuel GlasgowGlasgow-785

Automated fit42/100
Similar Person
Dates1841–1916PlacesIreland, United Kingdom → Brisbane, Queensland, AustraliaParent comparisonNo shared parent is indexed
Why it may fit
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 10 (+10)
  • matching child name: George Glasgow

No indexed conflict

Full comparison detail
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 10 (+10)
  • matching child name: George Glasgow

Conflicts: No indexed conflict

Same-name candidate

Samuel L GlasgowGlasgow-3132

Automated fit36/100
Similar Person
Dates1827–?PlacesHuntingdon, Pennsylvania, United StatesParent comparisonNo shared parent is indexed
Why it may fit
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 4 (+18)

No indexed conflict

Full comparison detail
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 4 (+18)

Conflicts: No indexed conflict

Same-name candidate

Samuel GlasgowGlasgow-2504

Automated fit36/100
Similar Person
Dates1836–1905PlacesBelmont, Ohio, United States → St Marys, Pottawatomie, Kansas, United StatesParent comparisonNo shared parent is indexed
Why it may fit
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 5 (+18)

No indexed conflict

Full comparison detail
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 5 (+18)

Conflicts: No indexed conflict

Same-name candidate

Samuel GlasgowGlasgow-3450

Automated fit28/100
Similar Person
Dates1821–?PlacesAyrshire, Scotland, United KingdomParent comparisonNo shared parent is indexed
Why it may fit
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 10 (+10)

No indexed conflict

Full comparison detail
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 10 (+10)

Conflicts: No indexed conflict

How duplicate leads are calculated

Dates are eligibility gates, not merely deductions: chronologically impossible people are excluded. Dates, places, spouses, parent certainty and children's profiles and names are then compared. A high score is a prompt to inspect records, not a merge recommendation.

Open only what you need

Research & records

Life and record timelineChronological mapped occurrences and their underlying sources.1 record
b. 1831

Profile-stated birthplace: North Carolina, United States

North Carolina, United States

One-Tree export profile fields are search leads, not sources; relationships are shown only where the export supplies parent links.

One-Tree profile leadunknown
Source and mapping detail

WikiTree profile export for Glasgow-2277

No sufficiently specific citation match found.

Precision: Country-centre fallback for profile locality

Evidence assessmentWhat is supported, uncertain or disputed in the current case model.14 claims
5Derivative
1Tree Only

Documented or strongly supported

No claims in this category have been formally assessed.

Working hypotheses and conflicts

No claims in this category have been formally assessed.

Research questionsOpen problems, missing bridges and the next records to inspect.0 open

No formal open question is recorded for this person.

Sources and provenanceStructured citations and source-quality classifications.6 sources
Technical profile and raw captureDataset metadata, machine dossier and captured WikiTree biography.Advanced

WikiTree profile information

Dataset: ONT_Glasco_2026-08-18T16_05.json · generated 2026-08-20

Machine-readable dossier

WikiTree biography, citations and relationship snapshot

Glasgow-2277 was captured 2026-08-07T09:54:35+00:00; WikiTree profile revision 2026-01-10.

Profile location claims

EventDateLocationStatus
birthNorth Carolina, United StatesWikiTree profile field
marriage1855-01-06Halifax, North Carolina, United StatesWikiTree relationship field

Immediate relationship snapshot

RelationshipPersonWikiTree IDDates and places returned
ChildrenCharley GlasgowGlasgow-22781857-00-00 · North Carolina, United States · 0000-00-00
ChildrenSarah GlasgowGlasgow-22791859-00-00 · North Carolina, United States · 0000-00-00
ChildrenPattie GlasgowGlasgow-22801861-00-00 · North Carolina, United States · 0000-00-00
ChildrenAnna GlasgowGlasgow-22811865-00-00 · North Carolina, United States · 0000-00-00
ChildrenEliza GlasgowGlasgow-22821867-00-00 · North Carolina, United States · 0000-00-00
ChildrenAndrew Simeon GlasgowGlasgow-22761868-00-00 · Butterwood Township, Halifax, North Carolina, United States · 1946-00-00
ChildrenGeorge GlasgowGlasgow-22831869-00-00 · North Carolina, United States · 0000-00-00
ChildrenNannie GlasgowGlasgow-22841873-00-00 · North Carolina, United States · 0000-00-00
ChildrenMoses GlasgowGlasgow-22851873-01-09 · North Carolina, United States · 1961-12-28 · Roanoke Rapids, Halifax, North Carolina, United States
ChildrenLavina GlasgowGlasgow-22861876-00-00 · North Carolina, United States · 0000-00-00
ChildrenAffie GlasgowGlasgow-22871878-00-00 · North Carolina, United States · 0000-00-00
ChildrenSandy GlasgowGlasgow-22881880-00-00 · North Carolina, United States · 0000-00-00
SpousesRebecca GlasgowButts-22961838-00-00 · North Carolina, United States · 0000-00-00 · 1855-01-06 · Halifax, North Carolina, United States

Profile categories

12th Regiment, North Carolina Infantry, United States Civil War 12th_Regiment,_North_Carolina_Infantry,_United_States_Civil_War

Record-bearing passages

Profile source citations

  1. "North Carolina Marriages, 1759-1979", database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:F86C-Z4W : 14 February 2020), Samuel A. I. Glasgow, 1855. source link 1
  2. "United States Census, 1870", database with images, FamilySearch (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:MW8S-VZV : 29 May 2021), S A Glasgow in entry for N B Hammel, 1870. source link 1
  3. "United States Census, 1880," database with images, FamilySearch (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:MCXM-K4G : 14 January 2022), Saml.a. Glascow, Butterwood Township, Halifax, North Carolina, United States; citing enumeration district , sheet , NARA microfilm publication T9 (Washington, D.C.: National Archives and Records Administration, n.d.), FHL microfilm . source link 1
  4. "North Carolina Deaths and Burials, 1898-1994", database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:H4N9-FJW2 : 14 February 2020), Samuel Andrew Jackson Glasgow in entry for Moses A. Glasgow, 1961. source link 1
  5. Find a Grave, database and images (https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/280544220/samuel_andrew_jackson-glasgow: accessed January 10, 2026), memorial page for Samuel Andrew Jackson Glasgow (unknown–1898), Find a Grave Memorial ID 280544220, citing Glasgow Family Cemetery, Littleton, Halifax County, North Carolina, USA; Maintained by Jeff Donaldson (contributor 47678069). source link 1
Full captured biography text
BiographySources
* "North Carolina Marriages, 1759-1979", database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:F86C-Z4W : 14 February 2020), Samuel A. I. Glasgow, 1855.
* "United States Census, 1870", database with images, FamilySearch (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:MW8S-VZV : 29 May 2021), S A Glasgow in entry for N B Hammel, 1870.
* "United States Census, 1880," database with images, FamilySearch (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:MCXM-K4G : 14 January 2022), Saml.a. Glascow, Butterwood Township, Halifax, North Carolina, United States; citing enumeration district , sheet , NARA microfilm publication T9 (Washington, D.C.: National Archives and Records Administration, n.d.), FHL microfilm .
* "North Carolina Deaths and Burials, 1898-1994", database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:H4N9-FJW2 : 14 February 2020), Samuel Andrew Jackson Glasgow in entry for Moses A. Glasgow, 1961.
* Find a Grave, database and images (https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/280544220/samuel_andrew_jackson-glasgow: accessed January 10, 2026), memorial page for Samuel Andrew Jackson Glasgow (unknown–1898), Find a Grave Memorial ID 280544220, citing Glasgow Family Cemetery, Littleton, Halifax County, North Carolina, USA; Maintained by Jeff Donaldson (contributor 47678069).
Raw WikiTree biography markup
[[Category:12th Regiment, North Carolina Infantry, United States Civil War]]
== Biography ==
{{US Civil War
|side= CSA
|enlisted= 25 Feb 1862
|mustered= 9 Apr 1865
|rank= 
|unit= 
|regiment flag= 
|regiment name= 
}}

== Sources ==
<references />
* "North Carolina Marriages, 1759-1979", database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:F86C-Z4W : 14 February 2020), Samuel A. I. Glasgow, 1855.
* "United States Census, 1870", database with images, FamilySearch (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:MW8S-VZV : 29 May 2021), S A Glasgow in entry for N B Hammel, 1870.
* "United States Census, 1880," database with images, FamilySearch (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:MCXM-K4G : 14 January 2022), Saml.a. Glascow, Butterwood Township, Halifax, North Carolina, United States; citing enumeration district , sheet , NARA microfilm publication T9 (Washington, D.C.: National Archives and Records Administration, n.d.), FHL microfilm .
* "North Carolina Deaths and Burials, 1898-1994", database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:H4N9-FJW2 : 14 February 2020), Samuel Andrew Jackson Glasgow in entry for Moses A. Glasgow, 1961.
* Find a Grave, database and images (https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/280544220/samuel_andrew_jackson-glasgow: accessed January 10, 2026), memorial page for Samuel Andrew Jackson Glasgow (unknown–1898), Find a Grave Memorial ID 280544220, citing Glasgow Family Cemetery, Littleton, Halifax County, North Carolina, USA; Maintained by Jeff Donaldson (contributor 47678069).