Individual research record
James Glasgow
1719 – 1785
Glasgow-2916 · 1 mapped association
At a glance
Identity & family
Tree links organise the family; documentary status still varies.
- Birth
- 1719 · Londonderry, County Londonderry, Ireland
- Death
- 1785 · Place not recorded
- Parents
- Charles James Glasgowunmarked
- Spouses
- Not recorded
- Children
- William Glasgow
- Gender
- Male
- WikiTree
- Glasgow-2916
- Research clusters
- Cross/Derry reconstruction — unproved
- Mapped descendants
- 135
Comparison context
These child positions and checks are the subject details used to rank possible parents below.
Naming sequence used by the parentage model
Known-position checks: 0 support · 0 conflict. Ordinals retain unnamed children and recognise reused names.
Relationship comparison
Potential parents or duplicates
Compare scored leads with the subject details above—not proof.
Possible fathers5 leads
Possible Father
Nathaniel Glasgow M.A.Glasgow-1136
- plausible 29-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 70 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1760), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- mapped Keady sub-townland — Eskaheen is 11.0 km from the subject's birth-period Londonderry / Derry (+2; one or both placements are unproved)
a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15)
Show complete scoring
- plausible 29-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 70 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1760), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- mapped Keady sub-townland — Eskaheen is 11.0 km from the subject's birth-period Londonderry / Derry (+2; one or both placements are unproved)
Deductions and cautions: a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15)
Possible Father
Ezekiel GlasgowGlasgow-2844
- plausible 29-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 70 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1760), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- descendant branches share only a broad migration destination country (+1; weak alone): united states
a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)
Show complete scoring
- plausible 29-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 70 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1760), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- descendant branches share only a broad migration destination country (+1; weak alone): united states
Deductions and cautions: a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)
Show 3 lower-scoring possible fathers
Possible Father
William GlasgowGlasgow-428
- plausible 34-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 75 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1760), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- a known child was born within 7 years of the subject (+1)
a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction); no known spouse has a plausible maternal age at the subject's birth (−6; an unknown spouse remains possible)
Show complete scoring
- plausible 34-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 75 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1760), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- a known child was born within 7 years of the subject (+1)
- candidate's name matches the first dated son William Glasgow, the expected father position for a male subject (+4; catalogue rarity 0, William in 223 profiles)
Deductions and cautions: a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction); no known spouse has a plausible maternal age at the subject's birth (−6; an unknown spouse remains possible)
Possible Father
James GlasgowGlasgow-1238
- the nominal 7-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (16–17 years) (+4)
- candidate's birth is 48 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1760), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- candidate and subject share the given name James (+4; weak direct parent-child name recurrence, 224 public profiles)
a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction); candidate is recorded only outside the subject's birth country (−25); subject lies more than 20 years from the candidate's known child-bearing period (−6; children may be missing)
Show complete scoring
- the nominal 7-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (16–17 years) (+4)
- candidate's birth is 48 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1760), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- candidate and subject share the given name James (+4; weak direct parent-child name recurrence, 224 public profiles)
- descendant branches share only a broad migration destination country (+1; weak alone): new zealand
Deductions and cautions: a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction); candidate is recorded only outside the subject's birth country (−25); subject lies more than 20 years from the candidate's known child-bearing period (−6; children may be missing)
Possible Father
Mary GlascowGlasgow-1241
- the nominal 8-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (16–18 years) (+4)
- candidate's birth is 49 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1760), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction); candidate is recorded only outside the subject's birth country (−25)
Show complete scoring
- the nominal 8-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (16–18 years) (+4)
- candidate's birth is 49 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1760), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
Deductions and cautions: a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction); candidate is recorded only outside the subject's birth country (−25)
Possible mothers5 leads
Possible Mother
Margaret (Montfort) GlasgowMontfort-406
- candidate's birth is 66 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1760), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- a known child was born within 5 years of the subject (+1)
- bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at least 25 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
candidate is recorded only outside the subject's birth country (−25)
Show complete scoring
- bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at least 25 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
- candidate's birth is 66 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1760), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- a known child was born within 5 years of the subject (+1)
- a candidate spouse matches the first dated son William Glasgow, the expected father position (+3; William in 223 profiles)
- descendant branches share only a broad migration destination country (+1; weak alone): united states
Deductions and cautions: candidate is recorded only outside the subject's birth country (−25)
Possible Mother
Ann (McCook) GlasgowMcCook-217
- candidate's birth is 90 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1760), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- less typical 49-year parent-child age gap (+2)
- a candidate spouse matches the first dated son William Glasgow, the expected father position (+3; William in 223 profiles)
same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10); candidate already has another child named James Glasgow (Glasgow-1025) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict)
Show complete scoring
- less typical 49-year parent-child age gap (+2)
- candidate's birth is 90 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1760), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- a candidate spouse matches the first dated son William Glasgow, the expected father position (+3; William in 223 profiles)
- descendant branches share only a broad migration destination country (+1; weak alone): united states
Deductions and cautions: same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10); candidate already has another child named James Glasgow (Glasgow-1025) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict)
Show 3 lower-scoring possible mothers
Possible Mother
Jean (Dobie) GlasgowDobie-449
- plausible 39-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 80 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1760), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)
Show complete scoring
- plausible 39-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 80 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1760), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
Deductions and cautions: locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)
Possible Mother
Rachel WilsonWilson-78088
- plausible 39-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 80 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1760), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- descendant branches share only a broad migration destination country (+1; weak alone): united states
same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10); candidate already has another child named James Glasgow (Glasgow-1144) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict)
Show complete scoring
- plausible 39-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 80 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1760), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- descendant branches share only a broad migration destination country (+1; weak alone): united states
Deductions and cautions: same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10); candidate already has another child named James Glasgow (Glasgow-1144) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict)
Possible Mother
Catherine (Mangan) GlascoMangan-824
- plausible 29-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 70 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1760), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10); candidate already has another child named James Glasco (Glasco-148) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict)
Show complete scoring
- plausible 29-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 70 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1760), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
Deductions and cautions: same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10); candidate already has another child named James Glasco (Glasco-148) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict)
How parent leads are calculated
Automated leads use birth surnames—not married surnames—as parental eligibility, role-specific biological age limits, bounded and approximate-date uncertainty, household chronology, specific time-aware localities, mapped distance, tenancy succession, migration destinations and sex-aware Scottish naming positions across generations. People already attached as the subject's parents stay in the identity summary and are excluded from this alternative-candidate list, regardless of relationship confidence. The main calibration uses clues available on disconnected profiles; existing parent and sibling links are retained as comparison context rather than treated as transferable evidence. Common ordered names and grandparent-to-child echoes receive a small non-zero weight, so a John or James match can support several independent criteria without producing a lead alone. Rare names, repeated bearers and bundles across otherwise distinct branches receive substantially more weight according to catalogue frequency. An exact migration place is weighted by its rarity and repetition across both branches; a shared destination country is worth only one point. Extra weight is added only when at least three independent clue types converge: naming, locality, specific migration, household chronology or collateral networks. Sparse profiles retain a clearly labelled chronology-only fallback instead of disappearing. Countries, states, counties and research clusters do not count as a shared locality, and fallback, broad representative or kin-inferred coordinates are excluded from distance scoring. Shared descendant profiles are removed before branch-name comparison. A candidate already recorded as a parent-in-law is excluded. A confident or independently supported parent is treated as settled; uncertain and unassessed attachments remain open to alternative comparison. A different linked parent, an uncle/aunt or grandparent path, and a matching existing child profile prevent an alternative from being classified as a strong direct-parent lead until the underlying tree conflict or duplicate is resolved. Familiar forms such as Bessie are normalised. Surname remains an eligibility filter worth zero points.
Naming customs, shared farms and occupations are circumstantial. Children, spouses and collateral relatives may be missing, and tree-derived family networks are not independent evidence. Scores rank research leads; they do not prove parentage.
Same-name candidate
James GlasgowGlasgow-2868
- same first and last name (+18)
- birth years within 1 (+25)
- death years within 1 (+10)
unassessed father attachments differ (−5)
Full comparison detail
- same first and last name (+18)
- birth years within 1 (+25)
- death years within 1 (+10)
Conflicts: unassessed father attachments differ (−5)
Same-name candidate
James GlasgowGlasgow-3523
- same first and last name (+18)
- same birth year (+30)
unassessed father attachments differ (−5)
Full comparison detail
- same first and last name (+18)
- same birth year (+30)
Conflicts: unassessed father attachments differ (−5)
How duplicate leads are calculated
Dates are eligibility gates, not merely deductions: chronologically impossible people are excluded. Dates, places, spouses, parent certainty and children's profiles and names are then compared. A high score is a prompt to inspect records, not a merge recommendation.
Open only what you need
Research & records
Life and record timelineChronological mapped occurrences and their underlying sources.1 record
Profile-stated Londonderry birth
No inspected record connects James to Charles-2917, Cross, or the Moneymore family. Grouped only to show the existing reconstruction.
Source and mapping detail
WikiTree profile export for Glasgow-2916
No sufficiently specific citation match found.
Precision: Settlement centrepoint
Evidence assessmentWhat is supported, uncertain or disputed in the current case model.3 claims
Documented or strongly supported
No claims in this category have been formally assessed.
Working hypotheses and conflicts
No claims in this category have been formally assessed.
Research questionsOpen problems, missing bridges and the next records to inspect.0 open
No formal open question is recorded for this person.
Sources and provenanceStructured citations and source-quality classifications.3 sources
Source or provenance: quality describes the record layer, not every conclusion drawn from it.
- tree_only Unsourced family tree handed down to M Glasgow.
- unknown https://www.myheritage.com/profile-798694011-2003649/james-glasgow
- tree_only WikiTree profile export for Glasgow-2916
Technical profile and raw captureDataset metadata, machine dossier and captured WikiTree biography.Advanced
WikiTree profile information
Glasgow-2916
James Glasgow
Updated 2024-05-08
Dataset: ONT_Glasco_2026-08-18T16_05.json · generated 2026-08-20
WikiTree biography, citations and relationship snapshot
Glasgow-2916 was captured 2026-08-07T09:54:35+00:00; WikiTree profile revision 2024-05-08.
Profile location claims
| Event | Date | Location | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| birth | — | Londonderry, County Londonderry, Ireland | WikiTree profile field |
Immediate relationship snapshot
| Relationship | Person | WikiTree ID | Dates and places returned |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parents | Charles James Glasgow | Glasgow-2917 | 1686-10-10 · Glencorse, Midlothian, Scotland · 0000-00-00 · Cross, County Londonderry, Ireland |
| Children | William Glasgow | Glasgow-2915 | 1760-00-00 · Scotland · 0000-00-00 · Cookstown, County Tyrone, Ireland |
Record-bearing passages
- Biography James was born in 1719. He passed away in 1785.
Unsourced family tree handed down to M Glasgow. Sources
Profile source citations
- Unsourced family tree handed down to M Glasgow.
- https://www.myheritage.com/profile-798694011-2003649/james-glasgow source link 1
Full captured biography text
Biography James was born in 1719. He passed away in 1785. Unsourced family tree handed down to M Glasgow. Sources * https://www.myheritage.com/profile-798694011-2003649/james-glasgow
Raw WikiTree biography markup
== Biography == James was born in 1719. He passed away in 1785. <ref> Unsourced family tree handed down to [[Glasgow-933|M Glasgow]]. </ref> == Sources == <references /> * https://www.myheritage.com/profile-798694011-2003649/james-glasgow