Glasgow Surname Project

Individual research record

William Glasgow

1760 – ?

Glasgow-2915 · 1 mapped association

Scotland→Cookstown, County Tyrone, Ireland
View on mapOpen WikiTreeCompareReport a correction

At a glance

Identity & family

Tree links organise the family; documentary status still varies.

1Mapped records
5Close relations
2Evidence items
12Candidate leads
Birth
1760 · Scotland
Death
Not recorded · Cookstown, County Tyrone, Ireland
Parents
James Glasgowunmarked
Spouses
Margaret Mitchell
Children
James GlasgowThomas GlasgowWilliam Glasgow
Gender
Male
WikiTree
Glasgow-2915
Research clusters
Cross/Derry reconstruction — unproved
Mapped descendants
134

Comparison context

These child positions and checks are the subject details used to rank possible parents below.

Naming sequence used by the parentage model

Paternal grandfather positionJames Glasgow (1799)
Maternal grandfather positionWilliam Glasgow (1804)
Maternal grandmother positionNot identifiable from dated child profiles
Paternal grandmother positionNot identifiable from dated child profiles

Known-position checks: 0 support · 1 conflict. Ordinals retain unnamed children and recognise reused names.

Relationship comparison

Potential parents or duplicates

Compare scored leads with the subject details above—not proof.

Higher-signal leadReview carefullyWeak lead

Possible fathers5 leads

Automated fit43/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1730–?Generation30 years age gapRecorded placesScotland · Cookstown, County Tyrone, Ireland · CookstownIndependent clue breadth · 8Age · Branch Migration · Indirect Multi-Factor Convergence · Sex-Aware Ordered Naming · Spouse · Tradition Validation · Two-Generation · Undated LocalityCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 30-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • same specific indexed locality despite wider place-label differences: cookstown, cookstown county tyrone ireland (+10)
  • 4 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+8): household chronology, locality, naming, specific migration

a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 30-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 69 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1799), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same specific indexed locality despite wider place-label differences: cookstown, cookstown county tyrone ireland (+10)
  • known spouse Unknown (Mitchell) Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (30) at the subject's birth (+3)
  • candidate's name matches the first dated son James Glasgow, the expected father position for a male subject (+4; catalogue rarity 0, James in 224 profiles)
  • family naming controls: 0 supporting and 1 conflicting known positions (already reflected in naming weight)
  • descendant branches converge on the same specific migration destination cookstown (+11; 8 migrated public profiles; +2 repeated-branch bonus)
  • 4 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+8): household chronology, locality, naming, specific migration

Deductions and cautions: a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15)

Automated fit35/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1721–1831Generation39 years age gapRecorded placesMoneymore, County Londonderry, Ireland · Moneymore, County Londonderry, Ireland, United Kingdom · MoneymoreIndependent clue breadth · 10Age · Broad Migration · Indirect Multi-Factor Convergence · Mapped Proximity · Rare Branch-Name Recurrence · Rare Name Bundle · Sex-Aware Ordered Naming · Spouse · Tradition Validation · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 39-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming
  • candidate's birth is 78 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1799), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)

a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); candidate is recorded only outside the subject's birth country (−25)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 39-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 78 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1799), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • mapped Moneymore is 6.9 km from the subject's birth-period Cookstown (+2; one or both placements are unproved)
  • known spouse Mary (Harkness) Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (35) at the subject's birth (+3)
  • candidate's name matches the first dated son James Glasgow, the expected father position for a male subject (+4; catalogue rarity 0, James in 224 profiles)
  • family naming controls: 0 supporting and 1 conflicting known positions (already reflected in naming weight)
  • uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Rachel +12 (25 public profiles; subject branch: Rachel (Glasgow) Hagan, Rachel Glasgow; candidate branch: Rachel Ramsey (Glasgow) Graham; +4 repetition bonus); Joseph +9 (39 public profiles; subject branch: Joseph Glasgow, Joseph Cunningham Glasgow; candidate branch: Joseph Glasgow, Joseph Montgomery Glasgow; +6 repetition bonus); Martha +9 (45 public profiles; subject branch: Martha Glasgow, Martha Glasgow; candidate branch: Martha Steele Glasgow, Martha (Glasgow) Patton; +6 repetition bonus) (+38 total including +8 multi-name bonus)
  • descendant branches share only a broad migration destination country (+1; weak alone): united states
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming

Deductions and cautions: a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); candidate is recorded only outside the subject's birth country (−25)

Show 3 lower-scoring possible fathers
Automated fit25/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1720–?Generation40 years age gapRecorded placesKirknewton — West LothianIndependent clue breadth · 5Age · Broad Migration · Rare Branch-Name Recurrence · Rare Name Bundle · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 40-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 79 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1799), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Alexander +9 (59 public profiles; subject branch: Alexander Glasgow, Alexander Glasgow; candidate branch: Alexander Glasgow, Alexander Glasgow; +6 repetition bonus); Jane +7 (71 public profiles; subject branch: Jane Glasgow, Jane Glasgow; candidate branch: Jane (Glasgow) Massarini; +4 repetition bonus); George +3 (61 public profiles; subject branch: George Henry Glasgow; candidate branch: George Glasgow) (+27 total including +8 multi-name bonus)

a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 40-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 79 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1799), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Alexander +9 (59 public profiles; subject branch: Alexander Glasgow, Alexander Glasgow; candidate branch: Alexander Glasgow, Alexander Glasgow; +6 repetition bonus); Jane +7 (71 public profiles; subject branch: Jane Glasgow, Jane Glasgow; candidate branch: Jane (Glasgow) Massarini; +4 repetition bonus); George +3 (61 public profiles; subject branch: George Henry Glasgow; candidate branch: George Glasgow) (+27 total including +8 multi-name bonus)
  • descendant branches share only a broad migration destination country (+1; weak alone): ireland, united states

Deductions and cautions: a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Automated fit19/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1738–?Generation22 years age gapRecorded placesCovington and Thankerton, Lanarkshire, Scotland · Lanarkshire — exact locality unprovedIndependent clue breadth · 7Age · Household · Rare Branch-Name Recurrence · Rare Name Bundle · Sex-Aware Ordered Naming · Tradition Validation · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 22-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 61 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1799), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • another recorded child shares the subject's birth year (+2; possible twins or date uncertainty)

a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 22-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 61 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1799), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • another recorded child shares the subject's birth year (+2; possible twins or date uncertainty)
  • candidate's name matches the first dated son James Glasgow, the expected father position for a male subject (+4; catalogue rarity 0, James in 224 profiles)
  • family naming controls: 0 supporting and 1 conflicting known positions (already reflected in naming weight)
  • uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: George +7 (61 public profiles; subject branch: George Henry Glasgow; candidate branch: George Glasgow, George Glasgow; +4 repetition bonus); Alexander +5 (59 public profiles; subject branch: Alexander Glasgow, Alexander Glasgow; candidate branch: Alexander Glasgow; +2 repetition bonus) (+16 total including +4 multi-name bonus)

Deductions and cautions: a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Automated fit19/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1731–1793Generation29 years age gapRecorded placesKilwaughter, Larne, County Antrim, Ireland · Newberry, South Carolina, United States · KilwaughterIndependent clue breadth · 9Age · Broad Migration · Rare Branch-Name Recurrence · Rare Name Bundle · Sex-Aware Ordered Naming · Spouse · Spouse-Specific Child Window · Tradition Validation · Two-GenerationSame-spouse child windowMary (Crosier) GlasgowCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 29-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 68 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1799), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • known spouse Mary (Crosier) Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (23) at the subject's birth (+3)

a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); candidate is recorded only outside the subject's birth country (−25)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 29-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 68 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1799), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1756–1775) (+6; other parent Mary (Crosier) Glasgow)
  • known spouse Mary (Crosier) Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (23) at the subject's birth (+3)
  • candidate's name matches the first dated son James Glasgow, the expected father position for a male subject (+4; catalogue rarity 0, James in 224 profiles)
  • family naming controls: 0 supporting and 1 conflicting known positions (already reflected in naming weight)
  • uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Rachel +14 (25 public profiles; subject branch: Rachel (Glasgow) Hagan, Rachel Glasgow; candidate branch: Rachel McCrackin, Rachel Keller; +6 repetition bonus); Joseph +5 (39 public profiles; subject branch: Joseph Glasgow, Joseph Cunningham Glasgow; candidate branch: Joseph P Glasgow; +2 repetition bonus) (+23 total including +4 multi-name bonus)
  • descendant branches share only a broad migration destination country (+1; weak alone): united states

Deductions and cautions: a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); candidate is recorded only outside the subject's birth country (−25)

Possible mothers5 leads

Automated fit54/100
Moderate Lead
Dates1730–?Generation30 years age gapRecorded placesScotland · Cookstown, County Tyrone, Ireland · Scotland — exact locality unprovedIndependent clue breadth · 6Age · Branch Migration · Indirect Multi-Factor Convergence · Sex-Aware Ordered Naming · Two-Generation · Undated LocalityCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 30-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • same specific indexed locality despite wider place-label differences: cookstown county tyrone ireland (+10)
  • 4 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+8): household chronology, locality, naming, specific migration

No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 30-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 69 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1799), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same specific indexed locality despite wider place-label differences: cookstown county tyrone ireland (+10)
  • a candidate spouse matches the first dated son James Glasgow, the expected father position (+3; James in 224 profiles)
  • descendant branches converge on the same specific migration destination cookstown (+11; 8 migrated public profiles; +2 repeated-branch bonus)
  • 4 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+8): household chronology, locality, naming, specific migration

Deductions and cautions: No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required

Automated fit39/100
Weak Lead
Dates1725–?Generation35 years age gapRecorded placesCounty Londonderry, Ireland · County Londonderry — exact locality unprovedIndependent clue breadth · 6Age · Broad Migration · Rare Branch-Name Recurrence · Rare Name Bundle · Sex-Aware Ordered Naming · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 35-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 74 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1799), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • a candidate spouse matches the first dated son James Glasgow, the expected father position (+3; James in 224 profiles)

candidate is recorded only outside the subject's birth country (−25)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 35-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 74 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1799), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • a candidate spouse matches the first dated son James Glasgow, the expected father position (+3; James in 224 profiles)
  • uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Rachel +12 (25 public profiles; subject branch: Rachel (Glasgow) Hagan, Rachel Glasgow; candidate branch: Rachel Ramsey (Glasgow) Graham; +4 repetition bonus); Joseph +9 (39 public profiles; subject branch: Joseph Glasgow, Joseph Cunningham Glasgow; candidate branch: Joseph Glasgow, Joseph Montgomery Glasgow; +6 repetition bonus); Martha +9 (45 public profiles; subject branch: Martha Glasgow, Martha Glasgow; candidate branch: Martha Steele Glasgow, Martha (Glasgow) Patton; +6 repetition bonus) (+38 total including +8 multi-name bonus)
  • descendant branches share only a broad migration destination country (+1; weak alone): united states

Deductions and cautions: candidate is recorded only outside the subject's birth country (−25)

Show 3 lower-scoring possible mothers
Automated fit32/100
Weak Lead
Dates1740–?Generation20 years age gapRecorded placesRoxburghshire — exact locality unprovedIndependent clue breadth · 3Age · Collateral Naming · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 20-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 59 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1799), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • candidate's sibling and niece/nephew network repeats names in the subject's descendant line (three rarest at most): David +7 (39 public profiles; sibling David Glasgow; +4 repetition bonus); Catherine +3 (32 public profiles; niece/nephew Catherine Glasgow) (+10 total)

locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 20-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 59 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1799), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • candidate's sibling and niece/nephew network repeats names in the subject's descendant line (three rarest at most): David +7 (39 public profiles; sibling David Glasgow; +4 repetition bonus); Catherine +3 (32 public profiles; niece/nephew Catherine Glasgow) (+10 total)

Deductions and cautions: locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Automated fit32/100
Weak Lead
Dates1730–?Generation30 years age gapRecorded placesRatho, Midlothian, Scotland · Midlothian — exact locality unprovedIndependent clue breadth · 5Age · Rare Branch-Name Recurrence · Rare Name Bundle · Spouse-Specific Child Window · Two-GenerationSame-spouse child windowJohn GlasgowCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 30-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 69 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1799), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1755–1768) (+6; other parent John Glasgow)

same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 30-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 69 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1799), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1755–1768) (+6; other parent John Glasgow)
  • uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: David +7 (39 public profiles; subject branch: David Glasgow, David Charles Glasgow; candidate branch: David Glasgow; +4 repetition bonus); George +3 (61 public profiles; subject branch: George Henry Glasgow; candidate branch: George Glasgow) (+14 total including +4 multi-name bonus)

Deductions and cautions: same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Automated fit31/100
Weak Lead
Dates1725–?Generation35 years age gapRecorded placesLibberton, Lanark, ScotlandIndependent clue breadth · 5Age · Broad Migration · Rare Branch-Name Recurrence · Spouse-Specific Child Window · Two-GenerationSame-spouse child windowJohn GlasgowCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 35-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 74 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1799), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1738–1761) (+6; other parent John Glasgow)

same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 35-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 74 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1799), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1738–1761) (+6; other parent John Glasgow)
  • uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Walter +12 (10 public profiles; subject branch: Walter Glasgow; candidate branch: Walter Franklin Glasgow) (+12 total)
  • descendant branches share only a broad migration destination country (+1; weak alone): united states

Deductions and cautions: same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

How parent leads are calculated

Automated leads use birth surnames—not married surnames—as parental eligibility, role-specific biological age limits, bounded and approximate-date uncertainty, household chronology, specific time-aware localities, mapped distance, tenancy succession, migration destinations and sex-aware Scottish naming positions across generations. People already attached as the subject's parents stay in the identity summary and are excluded from this alternative-candidate list, regardless of relationship confidence. The main calibration uses clues available on disconnected profiles; existing parent and sibling links are retained as comparison context rather than treated as transferable evidence. Common ordered names and grandparent-to-child echoes receive a small non-zero weight, so a John or James match can support several independent criteria without producing a lead alone. Rare names, repeated bearers and bundles across otherwise distinct branches receive substantially more weight according to catalogue frequency. An exact migration place is weighted by its rarity and repetition across both branches; a shared destination country is worth only one point. Extra weight is added only when at least three independent clue types converge: naming, locality, specific migration, household chronology or collateral networks. Sparse profiles retain a clearly labelled chronology-only fallback instead of disappearing. Countries, states, counties and research clusters do not count as a shared locality, and fallback, broad representative or kin-inferred coordinates are excluded from distance scoring. Shared descendant profiles are removed before branch-name comparison. A candidate already recorded as a parent-in-law is excluded. A confident or independently supported parent is treated as settled; uncertain and unassessed attachments remain open to alternative comparison. A different linked parent, an uncle/aunt or grandparent path, and a matching existing child profile prevent an alternative from being classified as a strong direct-parent lead until the underlying tree conflict or duplicate is resolved. Familiar forms such as Bessie are normalised. Surname remains an eligibility filter worth zero points.

Naming customs, shared farms and occupations are circumstantial. Children, spouses and collateral relatives may be missing, and tree-derived family networks are not independent evidence. Scores rank research leads; they do not prove parentage.

Same-name candidate

William GlasgowGlasgow-1223

Automated fit47/100
Similar Person
Dates1765–1820PlacesSwinton and Simprin, Berwickshire, Scotland → Kirknewton and East Calder, Midlothian, Scotland, United KingdomParent comparisonSame parent name; profile identity unproved
Why it may fit
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 5 (+18)
  • same parent name without a shared profile ID: James Glasgow (+2)

unassessed father attachments differ (−5)

Full comparison detail
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 5 (+18)
  • same parent name without a shared profile ID: James Glasgow (+2)
  • matching child name: James Glasgow

Conflicts: unassessed father attachments differ (−5)

Open side-by-side comparison

Same-name candidate

William GlasgowGlasgow-1387

Automated fit38/100
Similar Person
Dates1811–?PlacesDunaghy, Killcondray, AntrimParent comparisonNo shared parent is indexed
Why it may fit
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • matching child names: James Glasgow, William Glasgow

record-derived birth estimates differ by 51; retained without deduction; uncertain father attachments differ (no deduction)

Full comparison detail
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • matching child names: James Glasgow, William Glasgow

Conflicts: record-derived birth estimates differ by 51; retained without deduction; uncertain father attachments differ (no deduction)

Open side-by-side comparison
How duplicate leads are calculated

Dates are eligibility gates, not merely deductions: chronologically impossible people are excluded. Dates, places, spouses, parent certainty and children's profiles and names are then compared. A high score is a prompt to inspect records, not a merge recommendation.

Open only what you need

Research & records

Life and record timelineChronological mapped occurrences and their underlying sources.1 record
c.1760

Profile-stated later Irish event: Cookstown, County Tyrone, Ireland

Cookstown

One-Tree export profile fields are search leads, not sources. Attached parent profile(s): Glasgow-2916.

One-Tree profile leadunknown
Source and mapping detail

WikiTree profile export for Glasgow-2915

No sufficiently specific citation match found.

Precision: Settlement centrepoint

Evidence assessmentWhat is supported, uncertain or disputed in the current case model.6 claims
1Tree Only
1Unknown

Documented or strongly supported

No claims in this category have been formally assessed.

Working hypotheses and conflicts

No claims in this category have been formally assessed.

Research questionsOpen problems, missing bridges and the next records to inspect.4 open

Which records prove the subject's identity across events?

No current conclusion recorded.

Missing bridge: Not specified

Which original or indexed records identify the parents?

No current conclusion recorded.

Missing bridge: A contemporary record explicitly identifying the parent or parents.

Which spouses and children are directly supported by records?

No current conclusion recorded.

Missing bridge: Not specified

What conflicts or same-name conflations must be resolved?

No current conclusion recorded.

Missing bridge: Not specified

Sources and provenanceStructured citations and source-quality classifications.2 sources

Source or provenance: quality describes the record layer, not every conclusion drawn from it.

  1. unknown https://www.myheritage.com/profile-798694011-2002784/william-glasgow
  2. tree_only WikiTree profile export for Glasgow-2915
Technical profile and raw captureDataset metadata, machine dossier and captured WikiTree biography.Advanced

WikiTree profile information

Dataset: ONT_Glasco_2026-08-18T16_05.json · generated 2026-08-20

Machine-readable dossier

WikiTree biography, citations and relationship snapshot

Glasgow-2915 was captured 2026-08-07T09:54:35+00:00; WikiTree profile revision 2025-03-26.

Profile location claims

EventDateLocationStatus
birth—ScotlandWikiTree profile field
death—Cookstown, County Tyrone, IrelandWikiTree profile field

Immediate relationship snapshot

RelationshipPersonWikiTree IDDates and places returned
ParentsJames GlasgowGlasgow-29161719-00-00 · Londonderry, County Londonderry, Ireland · 1785-00-00
ChildrenJames GlasgowGlasgow-17021799-08-21 · County Tyrone, Ireland · 1882-03-15 · Ballynasollus, Kildress, Cookstown, County Tyrone, Ireland
ChildrenWilliam GlasgowGlasgow-5851804-00-00 · Ireland · 1898-04-09 · Montober, County Tyrone, Ireland
ChildrenThomas GlasgowGlasgow-16841815-00-00 · Killycurragh, Derryloran, County Tyrone, Ireland · 1844-00-00
SpousesMargaretMitchell-485761765-00-00 · 0000-00-00

Record-bearing passages

Profile source citations

  1. https://www.myheritage.com/profile-798694011-2002784/william-glasgow source link 1
Full captured biography text
Biography
William was born in 1760. 
Sources
* https://www.myheritage.com/profile-798694011-2002784/william-glasgow
Raw WikiTree biography markup
== Biography ==

William was born in 1760. 
== Sources ==
<references />
* https://www.myheritage.com/profile-798694011-2002784/william-glasgow