Glasgow Surname Project

Individual research record

James William Glasgow

1806-09-27 – 1867-07-30

Glasgow-2925 · 1 mapped association

Isle of Wight, Virginia, United States→Gibson, Tennessee, United States
View on mapOpen WikiTreeCompareReport a correction

At a glance

Identity & family

Tree links organise the family; documentary status still varies.

1Mapped records
1Close relations
5Evidence items
12Candidate leads
Birth
1806-09-27 · Isle of Wight, Virginia, United States
Death
1867-07-30 · Gibson, Tennessee, United States
Parents
Not recorded
Spouses
Not recorded
Children
Wayne Washington Glasgow
Gender
Male
WikiTree
Glasgow-2925
Research clusters
Worldwide One-Tree profile leads
Mapped descendants
15

Comparison context

These child positions and checks are the subject details used to rank possible parents below.

Naming sequence used by the parentage model

Paternal grandfather positionWayne Washington Glasgow (1854)
Maternal grandfather positionNot identifiable from dated child profiles
Maternal grandmother positionNot identifiable from dated child profiles
Paternal grandmother positionNot identifiable from dated child profiles

Known-position checks: 0 support · 0 conflict. Ordinals retain unnamed children and recognise reused names.

Relationship comparison

Potential parents or duplicates

Compare scored leads with the subject details above—not proof.

Higher-signal leadReview carefullyWeak lead

Possible fathers5 leads

Automated fit27/100
Weak Lead
Dates1776–1850Generation30 years age gapRecorded placesNorth Carolina, United States · Smith, Tennessee, United StatesIndependent clue breadth · 4Age · Broad Geography · Same-Sex Generational Naming · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 30-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 78 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1854), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • weak broad-area overlap: tennessee (+1; not a locality match)

No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 30-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 78 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1854), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • weak broad-area overlap: tennessee (+1; not a locality match)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • candidate and subject share the given name James (+4; weak direct parent-child name recurrence, 224 public profiles)

Deductions and cautions: No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required

Automated fit26/100
Weak Lead
Dates1785–1820Generation21 years age gapRecorded placesLocation not supplied — profile holding pointIndependent clue breadth · 3Age · Same-Sex Generational Naming · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 21-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 69 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1854), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)

locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 21-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 69 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1854), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • candidate and subject share the given name James (+4; weak direct parent-child name recurrence, 224 public profiles)

Deductions and cautions: locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Show 3 lower-scoring possible fathers
Automated fit25/100
Weak Lead
Dates1780–1840Generation26 years age gapRecorded placesCounty Londonderry, Ireland · Bakerstown, West Deer Twp, Allegheny Co., Pennsylvania, United States · Portglenone — regional family-tradition referenceIndependent clue breadth · 7Age · Contemporaneous Household Conflict · Household · Indirect Multi-Factor Convergence · Lineage Surname As Middle Name · Spouse · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 26-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • known spouse Peninnah (Thomas) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (28) at the subject's birth (+7)
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): collateral network, household chronology, naming

same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10); candidate's household recorded Robert Alexander Glasgow in Bakerstown, Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, United States within 1 years of the subject (−12; no contemporaneous child is indexed in the subject's locality)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 26-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 74 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1854), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • a known child was born within 1 years of the subject (+3)
  • known spouse Peninnah (Thomas) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (28) at the subject's birth (+7)
  • candidate-line surnames recur as descendant middle names: Thomas +10 (1 birth-surname profiles) (+10 total)
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): collateral network, household chronology, naming

Deductions and cautions: same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10); candidate's household recorded Robert Alexander Glasgow in Bakerstown, Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, United States within 1 years of the subject (−12; no contemporaneous child is indexed in the subject's locality)

Automated fit15/100
Weak Lead
Dates1789–1860Generation17 years age gapRecorded placesVirginia, United States · Pittsylvania, VirginiaIndependent clue breadth · 4Age · Broad Geography · Same-Sex Generational Naming · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • possible 17-year parent-child age gap (+10)
  • candidate's birth is 65 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1854), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • weak broad-area overlap: virginia (+1; not a locality match)

candidate already has another child named James D Glasgow (Glasgow-69) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict)

Show complete scoring
  • possible 17-year parent-child age gap (+10)
  • candidate's birth is 65 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1854), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • weak broad-area overlap: virginia (+1; not a locality match)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • candidate and subject share the given name James (+4; weak direct parent-child name recurrence, 224 public profiles)

Deductions and cautions: candidate already has another child named James D Glasgow (Glasgow-69) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict)

Automated fit15/100
Weak Lead
Dates1779–?Generation27 years age gapRecorded placesCounty Tyrone, Ireland · Doonbought townland · Glenleslie townlandIndependent clue breadth · 7Age · Contemporaneous Household Conflict · Rare Branch-Name Recurrence · Rare Name Bundle · Spouse · Spouse-Specific Child Window · Two-GenerationSame-spouse child windowCatherine (Unknown) GlasgowCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 27-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 75 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1854), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • known spouse Catherine (Unknown) Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (23) at the subject's birth (+3)

candidate is recorded only outside the subject's birth country (−25); candidate's household recorded Margaret Glasgow in Dunaghy, Kilconway, Antrim within 5 years of the subject (−12; no contemporaneous child is indexed in the subject's locality)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 27-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 75 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1854), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1801–1822) (+6; other parent Catherine (Unknown) Glasgow)
  • known spouse Catherine (Unknown) Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (23) at the subject's birth (+3)
  • uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Nora +14 (6 public profiles; subject branch: Nora Alice Glasgow; candidate branch: Nora Jane Glasgow); George +3 (61 public profiles; subject branch: George Grover Glasgow; candidate branch: George Glasgow) (+21 total including +4 multi-name bonus)

Deductions and cautions: candidate is recorded only outside the subject's birth country (−25); candidate's household recorded Margaret Glasgow in Dunaghy, Kilconway, Antrim within 5 years of the subject (−12; no contemporaneous child is indexed in the subject's locality)

Possible mothers5 leads

Automated fit12/100
Weak Lead
Dates1783–?Generation23 years age gapRecorded placesCounty Tyrone — exact locality unprovedIndependent clue breadth · 6Age · Contemporaneous Household Conflict · Rare Branch-Name Recurrence · Rare Name Bundle · Spouse-Specific Child Window · Two-GenerationSame-spouse child windowRobert GlascoCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 23-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 71 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1854), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1801–1822) (+6; other parent Robert Glasco)

candidate is recorded only outside the subject's birth country (−25); candidate's household recorded Margaret Glasgow in Dunaghy, Kilconway, Antrim within 5 years of the subject (−12; no contemporaneous child is indexed in the subject's locality)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 23-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 71 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1854), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1801–1822) (+6; other parent Robert Glasco)
  • uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Nora +14 (6 public profiles; subject branch: Nora Alice Glasgow; candidate branch: Nora Jane Glasgow); George +3 (61 public profiles; subject branch: George Grover Glasgow; candidate branch: George Glasgow) (+21 total including +4 multi-name bonus)

Deductions and cautions: candidate is recorded only outside the subject's birth country (−25); candidate's household recorded Margaret Glasgow in Dunaghy, Kilconway, Antrim within 5 years of the subject (−12; no contemporaneous child is indexed in the subject's locality)

Automated fit8/100
Weak Lead
Dates1774–?Generation32 years age gapRecorded placesGlasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland · GlasgowIndependent clue breadth · 3Age · Collateral Naming · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 32-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 80 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1854), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • candidate's sibling and niece/nephew network repeats names in the subject's descendant line (three rarest at most): Helen +8 (28 public profiles; niece/nephew Helen Glasgow); George +3 (61 public profiles; niece/nephew George Glasgow) (+11 total)

candidate is recorded only outside the subject's birth country (−25)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 32-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 80 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1854), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • candidate's sibling and niece/nephew network repeats names in the subject's descendant line (three rarest at most): Helen +8 (28 public profiles; niece/nephew Helen Glasgow); George +3 (61 public profiles; niece/nephew George Glasgow) (+11 total)

Deductions and cautions: candidate is recorded only outside the subject's birth country (−25)

Show 3 lower-scoring possible mothers
Automated fit5/100
Weak Lead
Dates1788–1824Generation18 years age gapRecorded placesAvondale, Lanarkshire, Scotland · New Monkland, Lanarkshire, Scotland, United Kingdom · Lanarkshire — exact locality unprovedIndependent clue breadth · 3Age · Rare Branch-Name Recurrence · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 18-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 66 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1854), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Helen +8 (28 public profiles; subject branch: Helen Frances (Glasgow) Perry; candidate branch: Helen Glasgow) (+8 total)

candidate is recorded only outside the subject's birth country (−25)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 18-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 66 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1854), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Helen +8 (28 public profiles; subject branch: Helen Frances (Glasgow) Perry; candidate branch: Helen Glasgow) (+8 total)

Deductions and cautions: candidate is recorded only outside the subject's birth country (−25)

Automated fit0/100
Weak Lead
Dates1799–?Generationnominally 7 years; approximate dates permit about 15–17 years age gapRecorded placesBarony, Lanarkshire, Scotland · Lanarkshire — exact locality unprovedIndependent clue breadth · 3Age · Collateral Naming · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • the nominal 7-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (15–17 years) (+4)
  • candidate's birth is 55 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1854), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • candidate's sibling and niece/nephew network repeats names in the subject's descendant line (three rarest at most): Helen +8 (28 public profiles; sibling Helen Glasgow) (+8 total)

parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction); candidate is recorded only outside the subject's birth country (−25)

Show complete scoring
  • the nominal 7-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (15–17 years) (+4)
  • candidate's birth is 55 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1854), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • candidate's sibling and niece/nephew network repeats names in the subject's descendant line (three rarest at most): Helen +8 (28 public profiles; sibling Helen Glasgow) (+8 total)

Deductions and cautions: parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction); candidate is recorded only outside the subject's birth country (−25)

Automated fit0/100
Weak Lead
Dates1791–?Generationat least 15 years age gapRecorded placesBarony, Lanarkshire, Scotland · Lanarkshire — exact locality unprovedIndependent clue breadth · 3Age · Collateral Naming · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • candidate's birth is 63 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1854), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at least 15 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
  • candidate's sibling and niece/nephew network repeats names in the subject's descendant line (three rarest at most): Helen +8 (28 public profiles; sibling Helen Glasgow) (+8 total)

candidate is recorded only outside the subject's birth country (−25)

Show complete scoring
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at least 15 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
  • candidate's birth is 63 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1854), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • candidate's sibling and niece/nephew network repeats names in the subject's descendant line (three rarest at most): Helen +8 (28 public profiles; sibling Helen Glasgow) (+8 total)

Deductions and cautions: candidate is recorded only outside the subject's birth country (−25)

How parent leads are calculated

Automated leads use birth surnames—not married surnames—as parental eligibility, role-specific biological age limits, bounded and approximate-date uncertainty, household chronology, specific time-aware localities, mapped distance, tenancy succession, migration destinations and sex-aware Scottish naming positions across generations. People already attached as the subject's parents stay in the identity summary and are excluded from this alternative-candidate list, regardless of relationship confidence. The main calibration uses clues available on disconnected profiles; existing parent and sibling links are retained as comparison context rather than treated as transferable evidence. Common ordered names and grandparent-to-child echoes receive a small non-zero weight, so a John or James match can support several independent criteria without producing a lead alone. Rare names, repeated bearers and bundles across otherwise distinct branches receive substantially more weight according to catalogue frequency. An exact migration place is weighted by its rarity and repetition across both branches; a shared destination country is worth only one point. Extra weight is added only when at least three independent clue types converge: naming, locality, specific migration, household chronology or collateral networks. Sparse profiles retain a clearly labelled chronology-only fallback instead of disappearing. Countries, states, counties and research clusters do not count as a shared locality, and fallback, broad representative or kin-inferred coordinates are excluded from distance scoring. Shared descendant profiles are removed before branch-name comparison. A candidate already recorded as a parent-in-law is excluded. A confident or independently supported parent is treated as settled; uncertain and unassessed attachments remain open to alternative comparison. A different linked parent, an uncle/aunt or grandparent path, and a matching existing child profile prevent an alternative from being classified as a strong direct-parent lead until the underlying tree conflict or duplicate is resolved. Familiar forms such as Bessie are normalised. Surname remains an eligibility filter worth zero points.

Naming customs, shared farms and occupations are circumstantial. Children, spouses and collateral relatives may be missing, and tree-derived family networks are not independent evidence. Scores rank research leads; they do not prove parentage.

Same-name candidate

James GlasgowGlasgow-1325

Automated fit43/100
Similar Person
Dates1804–?PlacesKirknewton, Edinburghshire, Scotland, United KingdomParent comparisonNo shared parent is indexed
Why it may fit
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 2 (+25)

No indexed conflict

Full comparison detail
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 2 (+25)

Conflicts: No indexed conflict

Open side-by-side comparison

Same-name candidate

James GlasgowGlasgow-3507

Automated fit43/100
Similar Person
Dates1804–?PlacesPlaces not recordedParent comparisonNo shared parent is indexed
Why it may fit
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 2 (+25)

No indexed conflict

Full comparison detail
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 2 (+25)

Conflicts: No indexed conflict

Open side-by-side comparison
How duplicate leads are calculated

Dates are eligibility gates, not merely deductions: chronologically impossible people are excluded. Dates, places, spouses, parent certainty and children's profiles and names are then compared. A high score is a prompt to inspect records, not a merge recommendation.

Open only what you need

Research & records

Life and record timelineChronological mapped occurrences and their underlying sources.1 record
b. 1806

Profile-stated birthplace: Isle of Wight, Virginia, United States

Isle of Wight, Virginia, United States

One-Tree export profile fields are search leads, not sources; relationships are shown only where the export supplies parent links.

One-Tree profile leadderivative
Source and mapping detail

WikiTree profile export for Glasgow-2925

Candidate matched on record type, year; inspect before treating it as the underlying record.

Precision: Country-centre fallback for profile locality

Evidence assessmentWhat is supported, uncertain or disputed in the current case model.2 claims
2Derivative
2Unknown
1Tree Only

Documented or strongly supported

No claims in this category have been formally assessed.

Working hypotheses and conflicts

No claims in this category have been formally assessed.

Research questionsOpen problems, missing bridges and the next records to inspect.0 open

No formal open question is recorded for this person.

Sources and provenanceStructured citations and source-quality classifications.5 sources

Source or provenance: quality describes the record layer, not every conclusion drawn from it.

  1. derivative Burial: "Find a Grave Index" citing record ID 226025098, Find a Grave (accessed 13 August 2024) James William Glasgow burial (died on 30 Jul 1867). Born on 27 Sep 1806.
  2. derivative Marriage: "Tennessee State Marriage Index, 1780-2002" citing p. , Gibson, Tennessee, United States, Tennessee State Library and Archives, Nashville, Tennessee (accessed 13 August 2024) James W Glasgow marriage to Mary J Fisher in 1837 in Gibson, Tennessee, United States.
  3. unknown 1840 Census: "1840 United States Federal Census" Year: 1840; Census Place: Gibson, Tennessee; Roll: 521; Page: 206; Family History Library Film: 0024544 - (accessed 13 August 2024) James Glasco in Gibson, Tennessee.
  4. unknown 1850 Census: "1850 United States Federal Census" The National Archives in Washington, DC; Record Group: Records of the Bureau of the Census; Record Group Number: 29; Series Number: M432; Residence Date: 1850; Home in 1850: District 11, Gibson, Tennessee; Roll: 878; Page: 247b; Line Number: 14 - (accessed 13 August 2024) James W Glassgow, Farmer, in District 11, Gibson, Tennessee, USA. Born in Virginia.
  5. tree_only WikiTree profile export for Glasgow-2925
Technical profile and raw captureDataset metadata, machine dossier and captured WikiTree biography.Advanced

WikiTree profile information

Dataset: ONT_Glasco_2026-08-18T16_05.json · generated 2026-08-20

Machine-readable dossier

WikiTree biography, citations and relationship snapshot

Glasgow-2925 was captured 2026-08-07T09:54:35+00:00; WikiTree profile revision 2024-08-13.

Profile location claims

EventDateLocationStatus
birth—Isle of Wight, Virginia, United StatesWikiTree profile field
death—Gibson, Tennessee, United StatesWikiTree profile field

Immediate relationship snapshot

RelationshipPersonWikiTree IDDates and places returned
ChildrenWayne Washington GlasgowGlasgow-28501854-00-00 · Tennessee, United States · 0000-00-00

Record-bearing passages

  • Biography James was born in 1806. James died on 30 July 1867 and was buried in Gibson, Tennessee, United States. Burial: "Find a Grave Index" citing record ID 226025098, Find a Grave (accessed 13 August 2024)

  • James William Glasgow burial (died on 30 Jul 1867). Born on 27 Sep 1806. Sources

    • Marriage: "Tennessee State Marriage Index, 1780-2002" citing p. , Gibson, Tennessee, United States, Tennessee State Library and Archives, Nashville, Tennessee (accessed 13 August 2024) James W Glasgow marriage to Mary J Fisher in 1837 in Gibson, Tennessee, United States.
  • 1840 Census: "1840 United States Federal Census" Year: 1840; Census Place: Gibson, Tennessee; Roll: 521; Page: 206; Family History Library Film: 0024544 - (accessed 13 August 2024) James Glasco in Gibson, Tennessee.
  • 1850 Census: "1850 United States Federal Census" The National Archives in Washington, DC; Record Group: Records of the Bureau of the Census; Record Group Number: 29; Series Number: M432; Residence Date: 1850; Home in 1850: District 11, Gibson, Tennessee; Roll: 878; Page: 247b; Line Number: 14 - (accessed 13 August 2024) James W Glassgow, Farmer, in District 11, Gibson, Tennessee, USA. Born in Virginia.

Profile source citations

  1. Burial: "Find a Grave Index" citing record ID 226025098, Find a Grave (accessed 13 August 2024) James William Glasgow burial (died on 30 Jul 1867). Born on 27 Sep 1806.
  2. Marriage: "Tennessee State Marriage Index, 1780-2002" citing p. , Gibson, Tennessee, United States, Tennessee State Library and Archives, Nashville, Tennessee (accessed 13 August 2024) James W Glasgow marriage to Mary J Fisher in 1837 in Gibson, Tennessee, United States.
  3. 1840 Census: "1840 United States Federal Census" Year: 1840; Census Place: Gibson, Tennessee; Roll: 521; Page: 206; Family History Library Film: 0024544 - (accessed 13 August 2024) James Glasco in Gibson, Tennessee.
  4. 1850 Census: "1850 United States Federal Census" The National Archives in Washington, DC; Record Group: Records of the Bureau of the Census; Record Group Number: 29; Series Number: M432; Residence Date: 1850; Home in 1850: District 11, Gibson, Tennessee; Roll: 878; Page: 247b; Line Number: 14 - (accessed 13 August 2024) James W Glassgow, Farmer, in District 11, Gibson, Tennessee, USA. Born in Virginia.
Full captured biography text
Biography
James was born in 1806. James died on 30 July 1867 and was buried in Gibson, Tennessee, United States. 
Burial:
"Find a Grave Index" 
citing record ID 226025098, Find a Grave 
 (accessed 13 August 2024) 
 
James William Glasgow burial (died on 30 Jul 1867). Born on 27 Sep 1806.
Sources
* Marriage: "Tennessee State Marriage Index, 1780-2002" citing p. , Gibson, Tennessee, United States, Tennessee State Library and Archives, Nashville, Tennessee (accessed 13 August 2024) James W Glasgow marriage to Mary J Fisher in 1837 in Gibson, Tennessee, United States.

* 1840 Census: "1840 United States Federal Census" Year: 1840; Census Place: Gibson, Tennessee; Roll: 521; Page: 206; Family History Library Film: 0024544 - (accessed 13 August 2024) James Glasco in Gibson, Tennessee.

* 1850 Census: "1850 United States Federal Census" The National Archives in Washington, DC; Record Group: Records of the Bureau of the Census; Record Group Number: 29; Series Number: M432; Residence Date: 1850; Home in 1850: District 11, Gibson, Tennessee; Roll: 878; Page: 247b; Line Number: 14 - (accessed 13 August 2024) James W Glassgow, Farmer, in District 11, Gibson, Tennessee, USA. Born in Virginia.
Raw WikiTree biography markup
== Biography ==

James was born in 1806. James died on 30 July 1867 and was buried in Gibson, Tennessee, United States.<ref>
'''Burial''':
"Find a Grave Index"<br/>
citing record ID 226025098, <i>Find a Grave</i><br/>
{{FamilySearch Record|6ZR9-S1PD}} (accessed 13 August 2024)<br/>
{{FindAGrave|226025098}}<br/>
James William Glasgow burial (died on 30 Jul 1867). Born on 27 Sep 1806.
</ref>

== Sources ==
<references />
* '''Marriage''': "Tennessee State Marriage Index, 1780-2002"<br/>citing p. , Gibson, Tennessee, United States, Tennessee State Library and Archives, Nashville, Tennessee<br/>{{FamilySearch Record|VNFM-G43}} (accessed 13 August 2024)<br/>James W Glasgow marriage to Mary J Fisher in 1837 in Gibson, Tennessee, United States.

* '''1840 Census''': "1840 United States Federal Census"<br/>Year: 1840; Census Place: Gibson, Tennessee; Roll: 521; Page: 206; Family History Library Film: 0024544<br/>{{Ancestry Sharing|20729111|7b22746f6b656e223a2268706b706f6c30476c4e716c57394442526979444e536f45337853304c613474715a6130744f773842354d3d222c22746f6b656e5f76657273696f6e223a225632227d}} - {{Ancestry Record|8057|3412994}} (accessed 13 August 2024)<br/>James Glasco in Gibson, Tennessee.

* '''1850 Census''': "1850 United States Federal Census"<br/>The National Archives in Washington, DC; Record Group: Records of the Bureau of the Census; Record Group Number: 29; Series Number: M432; Residence Date: 1850; Home in 1850: District 11, Gibson, Tennessee; Roll: 878; Page: 247b; Line Number: 14<br/>{{Ancestry Sharing|20729084|7b22746f6b656e223a225a6d474f594c6a7061393035426d7241677655594b30383734764a62712f7278312b5146772b6a6f7552303d222c22746f6b656e5f76657273696f6e223a225632227d}} - {{Ancestry Record|8054|6124068}} (accessed 13 August 2024)<br/>James W Glassgow, Farmer, in District 11, Gibson, Tennessee, USA. Born in Virginia.