Glasgow Surname Project

Individual research record

James Glasgow

c. 1789 – 1860-09-28

Glasgow-62 · 1 mapped association

Virginia, United States→Pittsylvania, Virginia
View on mapOpen WikiTreeCompareReport a correction

At a glance

Identity & family

Tree links organise the family; documentary status still varies.

1Mapped records
9Close relations
9Evidence items
12Candidate leads
Birth
c. 1789 · Virginia, United States
Death
1860-09-28 · Pittsylvania, Virginia
Parents
Not recorded
Spouses
Susannah (High) Glasgow
Children
Asa H. GlasgowBenjamin M. GlasgowBerryman GlasgowJames D GlasgowJohn S. GlasgowObediah GlasgowSarah (Glasgow) GainesSusan Ann Glasgow
Gender
Male
WikiTree
Glasgow-62
Research clusters
Worldwide One-Tree profile leads
Mapped descendants
8

Comparison context

These child positions and checks are the subject details used to rank possible parents below.

Naming sequence used by the parentage model

Paternal grandfather positionAsa H. Glasgow (1820)
Maternal grandfather positionJohn S. Glasgow (1821)
Maternal grandmother positionSarah (Glasgow) Gaines (1825)
Paternal grandmother positionSusan Ann Glasgow (1829)

Known-position checks: 0 support · 1 conflict. Ordinals retain unnamed children and recognise reused names.

Relationship comparison

Potential parents or duplicates

Compare scored leads with the subject details above—not proof.

Higher-signal leadReview carefullyWeak lead

Possible fathers5 leads

Automated fit26/100
Weak Lead
Dates1758–1789Generation31 years age gapRecorded placesCecil, Maryland · Cecil, Maryland.Independent clue breadth · 3Age · Same-Sex Generational Naming · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 31-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 62 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1820), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)

locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 31-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 62 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1820), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • candidate and subject share the given name James (+4; weak direct parent-child name recurrence, 224 public profiles)

Deductions and cautions: locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Automated fit23/100
Weak Lead
Dates1757–1805Generation32 years age gapRecorded placesCurrituck, Province of North Carolina · Currituck, Currituck Parish, North Carolina, United StatesIndependent clue breadth · 4Age · Household · Rare Branch-Name Recurrence · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 32-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 63 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1820), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)

same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 32-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 63 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1820), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • subject's birth fits within the candidate's overall child-bearing span (1781–1801) (+3; children are not tied to one spouse)
  • uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Susan +8 (18 public profiles; subject branch: Susan Ann Glasgow; candidate branch: Susan Caroline Glasgow) (+8 total)

Deductions and cautions: same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Show 3 lower-scoring possible fathers
Automated fit17/100
Weak Lead
Dates1735–1819Generation54 years age gapRecorded placesMaryland · Tennessee, United StatesIndependent clue breadth · 5Age · Same-Sex Generational Naming · Spouse · Spouse-Specific Child Window · Two-GenerationSame-spouse child windowPhereby (Sheppard) GlasgowCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • possible 54-year parent-child age gap (+10)
  • known spouse Phereby (Sheppard) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (41) at the subject's birth (+7)
  • candidate's birth is 85 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1820), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)

same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10); candidate already has another child named James Glasgow (Glasgow-2492) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict)

Show complete scoring
  • possible 54-year parent-child age gap (+10)
  • candidate's birth is 85 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1820), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1771–1790) (+6; other parent Phereby (Sheppard) Glasgow)
  • known spouse Phereby (Sheppard) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (41) at the subject's birth (+7)
  • candidate and subject share the given name James (+4; weak direct parent-child name recurrence, 224 public profiles)

Deductions and cautions: same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10); candidate already has another child named James Glasgow (Glasgow-2492) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict)

Automated fit9/100
Weak Lead
Dates1772–1862Generation17 years age gapRecorded placesTennessee · Union, Illinois, United StatesIndependent clue breadth · 3Age · Sex-Aware Ordered Naming · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • possible 17-year parent-child age gap (+10)
  • candidate's birth is 48 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1820), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)

same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Show complete scoring
  • possible 17-year parent-child age gap (+10)
  • candidate's birth is 48 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1820), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • a candidate spouse matches the second dated daughter Susan Ann Glasgow, the expected mother position (+5; Susan in 18 profiles)

Deductions and cautions: same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Automated fit8/100
Weak Lead
Dates1748–1812Generation41 years age gapRecorded placesLarne, County Antrim, Ireland · County Antrim — exact locality unprovedIndependent clue breadth · 4Age · Same-Sex Generational Naming · Spouse · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 41-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • known spouse Jane Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (39) at the subject's birth (+7)
  • candidate's birth is 72 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1820), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)

candidate is recorded only outside the subject's birth country (−25)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 41-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 72 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1820), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • known spouse Jane Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (39) at the subject's birth (+7)
  • candidate and subject share the given name James (+4; weak direct parent-child name recurrence, 224 public profiles)

Deductions and cautions: candidate is recorded only outside the subject's birth country (−25)

Possible mothers5 leads

Automated fit3/100
Weak Lead
Dates1782–?Generationnominally 7 years; approximate dates permit about 15–17 years age gapRecorded placesCurrituck, North Carolina, United States · Harpers River, Davidson, Tennessee, United States · Currituck, North Carolina, USAIndependent clue breadth · 3Age · Collateral Naming · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • the nominal 7-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (15–17 years) (+4)
  • candidate's birth is 38 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1820), a marginal two-generation interval (+1)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)

parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Show complete scoring
  • the nominal 7-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (15–17 years) (+4)
  • candidate's birth is 38 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1820), a marginal two-generation interval (+1)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • candidate's sibling and niece/nephew network repeats names in the subject's descendant line (three rarest at most): Susan +8 (18 public profiles; niece/nephew Susan Caroline Glasgow) (+8 total)

Deductions and cautions: parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Automated fit2/100
Weak Lead
Dates1774–1845Generation15 years age gapRecorded placesHuntingdon, Pennsylvania · Glasgow, Cambria, Pennsylvania, United StatesIndependent clue breadth · 3Age · Rare Branch-Name Recurrence · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • possible 15-year parent-child age gap (+10)
  • candidate's birth is 46 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1820), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)

same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10); subject lies more than 20 years from the candidate's known child-bearing period (−6; children may be missing); candidate already has another child named James Glasgow (Glasgow-665) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict)

Show complete scoring
  • possible 15-year parent-child age gap (+10)
  • candidate's birth is 46 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1820), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Susan +8 (18 public profiles; subject branch: Susan Ann Glasgow; candidate branch: Susan E (Glasgow) Troxell) (+8 total)

Deductions and cautions: same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10); subject lies more than 20 years from the candidate's known child-bearing period (−6; children may be missing); candidate already has another child named James Glasgow (Glasgow-665) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict)

Show 3 lower-scoring possible mothers
Automated fit0/100
Weak Lead
Dates1737–1793Generation52 years age gapRecorded placesWindham, North Carolina · Currituck, North Carolina, United StatesIndependent clue breadth · 3Age · Rare Branch-Name Recurrence · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • candidate's birth is 83 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1820), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Susan +8 (18 public profiles; subject branch: Susan Ann Glasgow; candidate branch: Susan Caroline Glasgow) (+8 total)

chronologically conflicting 52-year parent-child age gap (−8); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10); subject lies more than 20 years from the candidate's known child-bearing period (−6; children may be missing)

Show complete scoring
  • candidate's birth is 83 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1820), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Susan +8 (18 public profiles; subject branch: Susan Ann Glasgow; candidate branch: Susan Caroline Glasgow) (+8 total)

Deductions and cautions: chronologically conflicting 52-year parent-child age gap (−8); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10); subject lies more than 20 years from the candidate's known child-bearing period (−6; children may be missing)

Automated fit29/100
Chronology-Only Fallback
Dates1755–1818Generation34 years age gapRecorded placesLexington, Rockbridge, Virginia · Lexington, Rockbridge, Virginia, United StatesIndependent clue breadth · 4Age · Broad Geography · Spouse-Specific Child Window · Two-GenerationSame-spouse child windowArthur GlasgowCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 34-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 65 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1820), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • weak broad-area overlap: virginia (+1; not a locality match)

No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 34-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 65 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1820), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • weak broad-area overlap: virginia (+1; not a locality match)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1783–1793) (+6; other parent Arthur Glasgow)

Deductions and cautions: No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required

Automated fit28/100
Chronology-Only Fallback
Dates1765–?Generation24 years age gapRecorded placesLocation not supplied — profile holding pointIndependent clue breadth · 3Age · Spouse-Specific Child Window · Two-GenerationSame-spouse child windowWilliam GlasgowCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 24-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 55 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1820), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)

locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 24-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 55 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1820), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1783–1802) (+6; other parent William Glasgow)

Deductions and cautions: locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

How parent leads are calculated

Automated leads use birth surnames—not married surnames—as parental eligibility, role-specific biological age limits, bounded and approximate-date uncertainty, household chronology, specific time-aware localities, mapped distance, tenancy succession, migration destinations and sex-aware Scottish naming positions across generations. People already attached as the subject's parents stay in the identity summary and are excluded from this alternative-candidate list, regardless of relationship confidence. The main calibration uses clues available on disconnected profiles; existing parent and sibling links are retained as comparison context rather than treated as transferable evidence. Common ordered names and grandparent-to-child echoes receive a small non-zero weight, so a John or James match can support several independent criteria without producing a lead alone. Rare names, repeated bearers and bundles across otherwise distinct branches receive substantially more weight according to catalogue frequency. An exact migration place is weighted by its rarity and repetition across both branches; a shared destination country is worth only one point. Extra weight is added only when at least three independent clue types converge: naming, locality, specific migration, household chronology or collateral networks. Sparse profiles retain a clearly labelled chronology-only fallback instead of disappearing. Countries, states, counties and research clusters do not count as a shared locality, and fallback, broad representative or kin-inferred coordinates are excluded from distance scoring. Shared descendant profiles are removed before branch-name comparison. A candidate already recorded as a parent-in-law is excluded. A confident or independently supported parent is treated as settled; uncertain and unassessed attachments remain open to alternative comparison. A different linked parent, an uncle/aunt or grandparent path, and a matching existing child profile prevent an alternative from being classified as a strong direct-parent lead until the underlying tree conflict or duplicate is resolved. Familiar forms such as Bessie are normalised. Surname remains an eligibility filter worth zero points.

Naming customs, shared farms and occupations are circumstantial. Children, spouses and collateral relatives may be missing, and tree-derived family networks are not independent evidence. Scores rank research leads; they do not prove parentage.

Automated fit43/100
Similar Person
Dates1788–1849PlacesNewberry County, South Carolina, United States → Abbeville County, South Carolina, United StatesParent comparisonNo shared parent is indexed
Why it may fit
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 1 (+25)

No indexed conflict

Full comparison detail
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 1 (+25)

Conflicts: No indexed conflict

Open side-by-side comparison

Same-name candidate

James GlasgowGlasgow-3648

Automated fit43/100
Similar Person
Dates1791–1869PlacesKelvin, Lanarkshire, Scotland, United KingdomParent comparisonNo shared parent is indexed
Why it may fit
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 2 (+25)

No indexed conflict

Full comparison detail
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 2 (+25)

Conflicts: No indexed conflict

Open side-by-side comparison
How duplicate leads are calculated

Dates are eligibility gates, not merely deductions: chronologically impossible people are excluded. Dates, places, spouses, parent certainty and children's profiles and names are then compared. A high score is a prompt to inspect records, not a merge recommendation.

Open only what you need

Research & records

Life and record timelineChronological mapped occurrences and their underlying sources.1 record
b. 1789

Profile-stated birthplace: Virginia, United States

Virginia, United States

One-Tree export profile fields are search leads, not sources; relationships are shown only where the export supplies parent links.

One-Tree profile leadoriginal
Source and mapping detail

WikiTree profile export for Glasgow-62

Candidate matched on record type, year, place; inspect before treating it as the underlying record.

Precision: Country-centre fallback for profile locality

Evidence assessmentWhat is supported, uncertain or disputed in the current case model.10 claims
5Derivative
2Unknown
1Original
1Tree Only

Documented or strongly supported

No claims in this category have been formally assessed.

Working hypotheses and conflicts

No claims in this category have been formally assessed.

Research questionsOpen problems, missing bridges and the next records to inspect.0 open

No formal open question is recorded for this person.

Sources and provenanceStructured citations and source-quality classifications.9 sources

Source or provenance: quality describes the record layer, not every conclusion drawn from it.

  1. unknown High Family Journal-2001-pg 20
  2. derivative "Virginia Marriages, 1785-1940", database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:X5Y5-24M : 6 August 2020), James Glasgow, 1818.
  3. derivative Marriage record for James Glasgow and Susannah High, married 1818 in Virginia. Source number: 32.000; Source type: Electronic Database; Number of Pages: 1; Submitter Code: BFB. Yates Publishing. U.S. and International Marriage Records, 1560-1900 [database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations Inc, 2004.
  4. derivative "United States Census, 1840," database with images, FamilySearch (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:XHBW-24G : 19 May 2020), James Glasgow, Pittsylvania, Virginia, United States; citing p. 128, NARA microfilm publication , (Washington D.C.: National Archives and Records Administration, n.d.), roll ; FHL microfilm .
  5. derivative "United States Census, 1850," database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:M8DV-VDY : 4 April 2020), James Glasgow, Pittsylvania county, part of, Pittsylvania, Virginia, United States; citing family 4, NARA microfilm publication M432 (Washington, D.C.: National Archives and Records Administration, n.d.).
  6. derivative "United States Census, 1860", database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:MHMH-JQ3 : 19 March 2020), James Glasco, 1860.
  7. original Death of James Glasgow, Death Date: 28-Sep-1860, Death place: Pittsylvania Virginia, Age: 71, Birth date: about 1789, Occupation: Cooper, Spouse name: Susan. FHL Film Number: 2048580. "Virginia Deaths and Burials, 1853–1912." Index. FamilySearch, Salt Lake City, Utah, 2010. Index entries derived from digital copies of original and compiled records. Ancestry.com. Virginia, Deaths and Burials Index, 1853-1917 [database
  8. unknown High Family Journal Vol 13 pg 20
  9. tree_only WikiTree profile export for Glasgow-62
Technical profile and raw captureDataset metadata, machine dossier and captured WikiTree biography.Advanced

WikiTree profile information

Dataset: ONT_Glasco_2026-08-18T16_05.json · generated 2026-08-20

Machine-readable dossier

WikiTree biography, citations and relationship snapshot

Glasgow-62 was captured 2026-08-07T09:54:35+00:00; WikiTree profile revision 2020-10-30.

Profile location claims

EventDateLocationStatus
birth—Virginia, United StatesWikiTree profile field
death—Pittsylvania VirginiaWikiTree profile field
marriage1818-10-21Pittsylvania, Virginia, United StatesWikiTree relationship field

Immediate relationship snapshot

RelationshipPersonWikiTree IDDates and places returned
ChildrenAsa H. GlasgowGlasgow-631820-11-17 · Pittsylvania, Virginia, United States · 1903-12-25 · Campbell, Virginia, United States
ChildrenJohn S. GlasgowGlasgow-641821-00-00 · Virginia, United States · 0000-00-00
ChildrenSarah GainesGlasgow-651825-00-00 · 0000-00-00
ChildrenBenjamin M. GlasgowGlasgow-661827-00-00 · 0000-00-00
ChildrenSusan Ann GlasgowGlasgow-671829-00-00 · 0000-00-00
ChildrenBerryman GlasgowGlasgow-681830-00-00 · 0000-00-00
ChildrenJames D GlasgowGlasgow-691837-00-00 · 0000-00-00
ChildrenObediah GlasgowGlasgow-701838-00-00 · 0000-00-00
SpousesSusannah GlasgowHigh-4791800-00-00 · Virginia, United States · 1879-00-00 · 1818-10-21 · Pittsylvania, Virginia, United States

Record-bearing passages

  • James was born about 1800. He passed away about 1880. Sources

    • High Family Journal-2001-pg 20
    • "Virginia Marriages, 1785-1940", database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:X5Y5-24M : 6 August 2020), James Glasgow, 1818.
    • Marriage record for James Glasgow and Susannah High, married 1818 in Virginia. Source number: 32.000; Source type: Electronic Database; Number of Pages: 1; Submitter Code: BFB. Yates Publishing. U.S. and International Marriage Records, 1560-1900 [database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations Inc, 2004.
    • "United States Census, 1840," database with images, FamilySearch (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:XHBW-24G : 19 May 2020), James Glasgow, Pittsylvania, Virginia, United States; citing p. 128, NARA microfilm publication , (Washington D.C.: National Archives and Records Administration, n.d.), roll ; FHL microfilm .
    • "United States Census, 1850," database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:M8DV-VDY : 4 April 2020), James Glasgow, Pittsylvania county, part of, Pittsylvania, Virginia, United States; citing family 4, NARA microfilm publication M432 (Washington, D.C.: National Archives and Records Administration, n.d.).
    • "United States Census, 1860", database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:MHMH-JQ3 : 19 March 2020), James Glasco, 1860.
    • Death of James Glasgow, Death Date: 28-Sep-1860, Death place: Pittsylvania Virginia, Age: 71, Birth date: about 1789, Occupation: Cooper, Spouse name: Susan. FHL Film Number: 2048580. "Virginia Deaths and Burials, 1853–1912." Index. FamilySearch, Salt Lake City, Utah, 2010. Index entries derived from digital copies of original and compiled records. Ancestry.com. Virginia, Deaths and Burials Index, 1853-1917 [database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc., 2011.
    • High Family Journal Vol 13 pg 20

Profile source citations

  1. High Family Journal-2001-pg 20
  2. "Virginia Marriages, 1785-1940", database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:X5Y5-24M : 6 August 2020), James Glasgow, 1818. source link 1
  3. Marriage record for James Glasgow and Susannah High, married 1818 in Virginia. Source number: 32.000; Source type: Electronic Database; Number of Pages: 1; Submitter Code: BFB. Yates Publishing. U.S. and International Marriage Records, 1560-1900 [database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations Inc, 2004.
  4. "United States Census, 1840," database with images, FamilySearch (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:XHBW-24G : 19 May 2020), James Glasgow, Pittsylvania, Virginia, United States; citing p. 128, NARA microfilm publication , (Washington D.C.: National Archives and Records Administration, n.d.), roll ; FHL microfilm . source link 1
  5. "United States Census, 1850," database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:M8DV-VDY : 4 April 2020), James Glasgow, Pittsylvania county, part of, Pittsylvania, Virginia, United States; citing family 4, NARA microfilm publication M432 (Washington, D.C.: National Archives and Records Administration, n.d.). source link 1
  6. "United States Census, 1860", database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:MHMH-JQ3 : 19 March 2020), James Glasco, 1860. source link 1
  7. Death of James Glasgow, Death Date: 28-Sep-1860, Death place: Pittsylvania Virginia, Age: 71, Birth date: about 1789, Occupation: Cooper, Spouse name: Susan. FHL Film Number: 2048580. "Virginia Deaths and Burials, 1853–1912." Index. FamilySearch, Salt Lake City, Utah, 2010. Index entries derived from digital copies of original and compiled records. Ancestry.com. Virginia, Deaths and Burials Index, 1853-1917 [database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc., 2011.
  8. High Family Journal Vol 13 pg 20
Full captured biography text
Biography
James Glasgow was a cooper.

James was born about 1800. He passed away about 1880. 
Sources
* High Family Journal-2001-pg 20
* "Virginia Marriages, 1785-1940", database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:X5Y5-24M : 6 August 2020), James Glasgow, 1818.
* Marriage record for James Glasgow and Susannah High, married 1818 in Virginia. Source number: 32.000; Source type: Electronic Database; Number of Pages: 1; Submitter Code: BFB. Yates Publishing. U.S. and International Marriage Records, 1560-1900 [database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations Inc, 2004.
* "United States Census, 1840," database with images, FamilySearch (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:XHBW-24G : 19 May 2020), James Glasgow, Pittsylvania, Virginia, United States; citing p. 128, NARA microfilm publication , (Washington D.C.: National Archives and Records Administration, n.d.), roll ; FHL microfilm .
* "United States Census, 1850," database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:M8DV-VDY : 4 April 2020), James Glasgow, Pittsylvania county, part of, Pittsylvania, Virginia, United States; citing family 4, NARA microfilm publication M432 (Washington, D.C.: National Archives and Records Administration, n.d.).
* "United States Census, 1860", database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:MHMH-JQ3 : 19 March 2020), James Glasco, 1860.
* Death of James Glasgow, Death Date: 28-Sep-1860, Death place: Pittsylvania Virginia, Age: 71, Birth date: about 1789, Occupation: Cooper, Spouse name: Susan. FHL Film Number: 2048580. "Virginia Deaths and Burials, 1853–1912." Index. FamilySearch, Salt Lake City, Utah, 2010. Index entries derived from digital copies of original and compiled records. Ancestry.com. Virginia, Deaths and Burials Index, 1853-1917 [database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc., 2011.
* High Family Journal Vol 13 pg 20
Raw WikiTree biography markup
== Biography == 

James Glasgow was a cooper.

James was born about 1800. He passed away about 1880. 

== Sources ==
<references />


* High Family Journal-2001-pg 20
* "Virginia Marriages, 1785-1940", database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:X5Y5-24M : 6 August 2020), James Glasgow, 1818.
* Marriage record for James Glasgow and Susannah High, married 1818 in Virginia. Source number: 32.000; Source type: Electronic Database; Number of Pages: 1; Submitter Code: BFB. Yates Publishing. U.S. and International Marriage Records, 1560-1900 [database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations Inc, 2004.
* "United States Census, 1840," database with images, FamilySearch (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:XHBW-24G : 19 May 2020), James Glasgow, Pittsylvania, Virginia, United States; citing p. 128, NARA microfilm publication , (Washington D.C.: National Archives and Records Administration, n.d.), roll ; FHL microfilm .
* "United States Census, 1850," database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:M8DV-VDY : 4 April 2020), James Glasgow, Pittsylvania county, part of, Pittsylvania, Virginia, United States; citing family 4, NARA microfilm publication M432 (Washington, D.C.: National Archives and Records Administration, n.d.).
* "United States Census, 1860", database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:MHMH-JQ3 : 19 March 2020), James Glasco, 1860.
* Death of James Glasgow, Death Date: 28-Sep-1860, Death place: Pittsylvania Virginia, Age: 71, Birth date: about 1789, Occupation: Cooper, Spouse name: Susan. FHL Film Number: 2048580. "Virginia Deaths and Burials, 1853–1912." Index. FamilySearch, Salt Lake City, Utah, 2010. Index entries derived from digital copies of original and compiled records. Ancestry.com. Virginia, Deaths and Burials Index, 1853-1917 [database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc., 2011.
* High Family Journal Vol 13 pg 20