Glasgow Surname Project

Individual research record

Wilson Archibald Glasgow

c. 1824 – ?

Glasgow-405 · 1 mapped association

South Carolina, United States→Death place unknown
View on mapOpen WikiTreeCompareReport a correction

At a glance

Identity & family

Tree links organise the family; documentary status still varies.

1Mapped records
11Close relations
5Evidence items
12Candidate leads
Birth
c. 1824 · South Carolina, United States
Death
Not recorded · Place not recorded
Parents
Robert Glasgowunmarked
Spouses
Celia A. (Bohannon) Glasgow
Children
Alonzo GlasgowFrancis M GlasgowGeorge Washington GlasgowIsaac N GlasgowJames M GlasgowJohn H GlasgowRobert Kouchan GlasgowSarah J GlasgowWilliam Jefferson Glasgow
Gender
Male
WikiTree
Glasgow-405
Research clusters
Worldwide One-Tree profile leads
Mapped descendants
29

Comparison context

These child positions and checks are the subject details used to rank possible parents below.

Naming sequence used by the parentage model

Paternal grandfather positionJohn H Glasgow (1846)
Maternal grandfather positionGeorge Washington Glasgow (1849)
Maternal grandmother positionSarah J Glasgow (1854)
Paternal grandmother positionNot identifiable from dated child profiles

Known-position checks: 0 support · 1 conflict. Ordinals retain unnamed children and recognise reused names.

Relationship comparison

Potential parents or duplicates

Compare scored leads with the subject details above—not proof.

Higher-signal leadReview carefullyWeak lead

Possible fathers5 leads

Automated fit77/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1786–1848Generation38 years age gapRecorded placesCurrituck, North Carolina, United States · Dresden, Weakley, Tennessee, United StatesIndependent clue breadth · 12Age · Broad Geography · Child Naming · Collateral Naming · Contemporaneous Household Conflict · Indirect Multi-Factor Convergence · Rare Branch-Name Recurrence · Rare Name Bundle · Repeated Marriage Surnames · Spouse · Spouse-Specific Child Window · Two-GenerationSame-spouse child windowDosha (Cannady) GlasgowCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 38-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • known spouse Dosha (Cannady) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (32) at the subject's birth (+7)
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): collateral network, household chronology, naming

a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); candidate's household recorded Jesse Glasgow in Wake, North Carolina, United States within 1 years of the subject (−12; no contemporaneous child is indexed in the subject's locality)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 38-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 60 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1846), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • weak broad-area overlap: carolina (+1; not a locality match)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1813–1831) (+6; other parent Dosha (Cannady) Glasgow)
  • known spouse Dosha (Cannady) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (32) at the subject's birth (+7)
  • candidate's given name recurs among another recorded child (+5; Isaac occurs in 13 public profiles)
  • uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Francis +12 (11 public profiles; subject branch: Francis M Glasgow; candidate branch: Francis Marion Glasgow); Isaac +12 (13 public profiles; subject branch: Isaac N Glasgow; candidate branch: Isaac Carrington Glasgow); Susan +8 (18 public profiles; subject branch: Susan Sarah Jane (Glasgow) Barnes; candidate branch: Susan Caroline Glasgow) (+40 total including +8 multi-name bonus)
  • candidate's sibling and niece/nephew network repeats names in the subject's descendant line (three rarest at most): Ruth +12 (15 public profiles; sibling Ruth Glasgow) (+12 total)
  • uncommon spouse surnames recur across the subject and candidate branches: Clark +6 (+6 total)
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): collateral network, household chronology, naming

Deductions and cautions: a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); candidate's household recorded Jesse Glasgow in Wake, North Carolina, United States within 1 years of the subject (−12; no contemporaneous child is indexed in the subject's locality)

Automated fit39/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1794–1835Generation30 years age gapRecorded placesCurrituck, North Carolina, United States · Stewart, Tennessee, United States · Currituck, North Carolina, USAIndependent clue breadth · 8Age · Broad Geography · Collateral Naming · Contemporaneous Household Conflict · Household · Sex-Aware Ordered Naming · Tradition Validation · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 30-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 52 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1846), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • weak broad-area overlap: carolina (+1; not a locality match)

a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); candidate's household recorded James Marion Glasgow in Grainger, Tennessee, United States within 3 years of the subject (−12; no contemporaneous child is indexed in the subject's locality)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 30-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 52 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1846), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • weak broad-area overlap: carolina (+1; not a locality match)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • subject's birth fits within the candidate's overall child-bearing span (1821–1833) (+3; children are not tied to one spouse)
  • candidate's name matches the first dated son John H Glasgow, the expected father position for a male subject (+4; catalogue rarity 0, John in 278 profiles)
  • family naming controls: 0 supporting and 1 conflicting known positions (already reflected in naming weight)
  • candidate's sibling and niece/nephew network repeats names in the subject's descendant line (three rarest at most): Francis +12 (11 public profiles; niece/nephew Francis Marion Glasgow); Isaac +12 (13 public profiles; sibling Isaac Wesley Glasgow); Ruth +12 (15 public profiles; sibling Ruth Glasgow) (+36 total)

Deductions and cautions: a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); candidate's household recorded James Marion Glasgow in Grainger, Tennessee, United States within 3 years of the subject (−12; no contemporaneous child is indexed in the subject's locality)

Show 3 lower-scoring possible fathers
Automated fit39/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1790–?Generation34 years age gapRecorded placesCurrituck, North Carolina, United States · Halifax, North Carolina, United States · Currituck, North Carolina, USAIndependent clue breadth · 4Age · Broad Geography · Collateral Naming · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 34-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 56 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1846), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • weak broad-area overlap: carolina (+1; not a locality match)

a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); descendant-name recurrence has no independent household, record, migration or specific-locality anchor (score capped at 39)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 34-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 56 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1846), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • weak broad-area overlap: carolina (+1; not a locality match)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • candidate's sibling and niece/nephew network repeats names in the subject's descendant line (three rarest at most): Francis +12 (11 public profiles; niece/nephew Francis Marion Glasgow); Isaac +12 (13 public profiles; sibling Isaac Wesley Glasgow); Ruth +12 (15 public profiles; sibling Ruth Glasgow) (+36 total)

Deductions and cautions: a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); descendant-name recurrence has no independent household, record, migration or specific-locality anchor (score capped at 39)

Automated fit34/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1789–1831Generation35 years age gapRecorded placesSouth Carolina, United States · South CarolinaIndependent clue breadth · 6Age · Local Sibling Birth · Spouse · Spouse-Specific Child Window · Two-Generation · Undated LocalitySame-spouse child windowSarah GlasgowCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 35-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate is associated with the subject's stated birthplace, but not by a reliable near-contemporary record (+10)
  • known spouse Sarah Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (30) at the subject's birth (+7)

a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 35-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 57 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1846), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • candidate is associated with the subject's stated birthplace, but not by a reliable near-contemporary record (+10)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1817–1855) (+6; other parent Sarah Glasgow)
  • candidate has another child, Archibald C Glasgow, born 7 years from the subject in the same specific birth locality (+4; possible sibling-household clue)
  • known spouse Sarah Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (30) at the subject's birth (+7)

Deductions and cautions: a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15)

Automated fit28/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1815–1875Generationnominally 9 years; approximate dates permit about 16–19 years age gapRecorded placesWake Colorado, North Carolina, United States · Stoddard, Missouri, United States · Wake Co, NCIndependent clue breadth · 8Age · Broad Geography · Collateral Naming · Indirect Multi-Factor Convergence · Rare Branch-Name Recurrence · Rare Name Bundle · Repeated Marriage Surnames · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): collateral network, household chronology, naming
  • the nominal 9-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (16–19 years) (+4)
  • candidate's birth is 31 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1846), a marginal two-generation interval (+1)

a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction); no known spouse has a plausible maternal age at the subject's birth (−6; an unknown spouse remains possible)

Show complete scoring
  • the nominal 9-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (16–19 years) (+4)
  • candidate's birth is 31 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1846), a marginal two-generation interval (+1)
  • weak broad-area overlap: carolina (+1; not a locality match)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: George +5 (61 public profiles; subject branch: George Washington Glasgow; candidate branch: George Houston Glasgow, George Irvin Glasgow; +2 repetition bonus); Nancy +3 (49 public profiles; subject branch: Nancy A Glasgow; candidate branch: Nancy C Glasgow) (+12 total including +4 multi-name bonus)
  • candidate's sibling and niece/nephew network repeats names in the subject's descendant line (three rarest at most): Francis +12 (11 public profiles; sibling Francis Marion Glasgow); Susan +8 (18 public profiles; sibling Susan Caroline Glasgow) (+20 total)
  • uncommon spouse surnames recur across the subject and candidate branches: Clark +6 (+6 total)
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): collateral network, household chronology, naming

Deductions and cautions: a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction); no known spouse has a plausible maternal age at the subject's birth (−6; an unknown spouse remains possible)

Possible mothers5 leads

Automated fit100/100
Strong Multi-Factor Lead
Dates1795–1885Generation29 years age gapRecorded placesSouth Carolina, United States · Warrior, Jefferson, Alabama, United StatesIndependent clue breadth · 5Age · Local Same-Spouse Child Window · Spouse-Specific Child Window · Two-Generation · Undated LocalityExisting-tree context (not an independent clue)Exact Sibling Profiles · Parental Couple Structure · Sibling Parental CoupleSame-spouse child windowRobert GlasgowCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • candidate is already linked as parent of 5 exact subject sibling profiles (+32): Mary Amanda (Glasgow) McDonald, John F Glasgow, Elizabeth Glasgow, Robert L Glasgow, Elizabeth L Glasgow
  • plausible 29-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate is associated with the subject's stated birthplace, but not by a reliable near-contemporary record (+10)

No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required

Show complete scoring
  • candidate is the spouse of the linked opposite-sex parent (+8; tree couple clue)
  • plausible 29-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 51 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1846), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • candidate is associated with the subject's stated birthplace, but not by a reliable near-contemporary record (+10)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1823–1835) (+6; other parent Robert Glasgow)
  • same-couple children Elizabeth Glasgow (1823) and John F Glasgow (1825) bracket the subject in the same specific birth locality (+10; strong household-placement clue, not proof)
  • candidate is already linked as parent of 5 exact subject sibling profiles (+32): Mary Amanda (Glasgow) McDonald, John F Glasgow, Elizabeth Glasgow, Robert L Glasgow, Elizabeth L Glasgow
  • the candidate and the subject's linked father Robert Glasgow are jointly recorded as parents of 5 exact sibling profiles (+14; strong couple-structure clue)

Deductions and cautions: No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required

Automated fit71/100
Moderate Lead
Dates1792–1848Generation32 years age gapRecorded placesWake County, North Carolina, United States · Weakley County, Tennessee, United StatesIndependent clue breadth · 10Age · Broad Geography · Candidate-Family Tradition · Contemporaneous Household Conflict · Indirect Multi-Factor Convergence · Rare Branch-Name Recurrence · Rare Name Bundle · Repeated Marriage Surnames · Spouse-Specific Child Window · Two-GenerationSame-spouse child windowIsaac Wesley (Glascow) GlasgowCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 32-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): collateral network, household chronology, naming
  • candidate's birth is 54 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1846), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)

candidate's household recorded Jesse Glasgow in Wake, North Carolina, United States within 1 years of the subject (−12; no contemporaneous child is indexed in the subject's locality)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 32-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 54 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1846), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • weak broad-area overlap: carolina (+1; not a locality match)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1813–1831) (+6; other parent Isaac Wesley (Glascow) Glasgow)
  • uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Francis +12 (11 public profiles; subject branch: Francis M Glasgow; candidate branch: Francis Marion Glasgow); Isaac +12 (13 public profiles; subject branch: Isaac N Glasgow; candidate branch: Isaac Carrington Glasgow); Susan +8 (18 public profiles; subject branch: Susan Sarah Jane (Glasgow) Barnes; candidate branch: Susan Caroline Glasgow) (+40 total including +8 multi-name bonus)
  • uncommon spouse surnames recur across the subject and candidate branches: Clark +6 (+6 total)
  • the candidate's own child family has 2 known-position naming matches (+3; branch-level validation)
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): collateral network, household chronology, naming

Deductions and cautions: candidate's household recorded Jesse Glasgow in Wake, North Carolina, United States within 1 years of the subject (−12; no contemporaneous child is indexed in the subject's locality)

Show 3 lower-scoring possible mothers
Automated fit42/100
Moderate Lead
Dates1794–1847Generation30 years age gapRecorded placesSouth Carolina, United StatesIndependent clue breadth · 5Age · Local Sibling Birth · Spouse-Specific Child Window · Two-Generation · Undated LocalitySame-spouse child windowJames GlasgowCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 30-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate is associated with the subject's stated birthplace, but not by a reliable near-contemporary record (+10)
  • candidate's birth is 52 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1846), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)

No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 30-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 52 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1846), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • candidate is associated with the subject's stated birthplace, but not by a reliable near-contemporary record (+10)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1817–1855) (+6; other parent James Glasgow)
  • candidate has another child, Archibald C Glasgow, born 7 years from the subject in the same specific birth locality (+4; possible sibling-household clue)

Deductions and cautions: No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required

Automated fit39/100
Weak Lead
Dates1801–1832Generation23 years age gapRecorded placesCurrituck, North Carolina, United States · Harpers River, Davidson, Tennessee, United States · Currituck, North Carolina, USAIndependent clue breadth · 4Age · Broad Geography · Collateral Naming · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 23-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 45 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1846), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • weak broad-area overlap: carolina (+1; not a locality match)

descendant-name recurrence has no independent household, record, migration or specific-locality anchor (score capped at 39)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 23-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 45 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1846), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • weak broad-area overlap: carolina (+1; not a locality match)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • candidate's sibling and niece/nephew network repeats names in the subject's descendant line (three rarest at most): Francis +12 (11 public profiles; niece/nephew Francis Marion Glasgow); Isaac +12 (13 public profiles; sibling Isaac Wesley Glasgow); Ruth +12 (15 public profiles; sibling Ruth Glasgow) (+36 total)

Deductions and cautions: descendant-name recurrence has no independent household, record, migration or specific-locality anchor (score capped at 39)

Automated fit39/100
Weak Lead
Dates1795–1860Generation29 years age gapRecorded placesSouth Carolina, United States · Pemiscot, Missouri, United StatesIndependent clue breadth · 5Age · Indirect Multi-Factor Convergence · Sex-Aware Ordered Naming · Two-Generation · Undated LocalityCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 29-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate is associated with the subject's stated birthplace, but not by a reliable near-contemporary record (+10)
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming

only broad locality, ordinary naming and chronology support the match (score capped at 39 until a higher-information tree or record clue is found)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 29-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 51 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1846), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • candidate is associated with the subject's stated birthplace, but not by a reliable near-contemporary record (+10)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • a candidate spouse matches the first dated son John H Glasgow, the expected father position (+3; John in 278 profiles)
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming

Deductions and cautions: only broad locality, ordinary naming and chronology support the match (score capped at 39 until a higher-information tree or record clue is found)

How parent leads are calculated

Automated leads use birth surnames—not married surnames—as parental eligibility, role-specific biological age limits, bounded and approximate-date uncertainty, household chronology, specific time-aware localities, mapped distance, tenancy succession, migration destinations and sex-aware Scottish naming positions across generations. People already attached as the subject's parents stay in the identity summary and are excluded from this alternative-candidate list, regardless of relationship confidence. The main calibration uses clues available on disconnected profiles; existing parent and sibling links are retained as comparison context rather than treated as transferable evidence. Common ordered names and grandparent-to-child echoes receive a small non-zero weight, so a John or James match can support several independent criteria without producing a lead alone. Rare names, repeated bearers and bundles across otherwise distinct branches receive substantially more weight according to catalogue frequency. An exact migration place is weighted by its rarity and repetition across both branches; a shared destination country is worth only one point. Extra weight is added only when at least three independent clue types converge: naming, locality, specific migration, household chronology or collateral networks. Sparse profiles retain a clearly labelled chronology-only fallback instead of disappearing. Countries, states, counties and research clusters do not count as a shared locality, and fallback, broad representative or kin-inferred coordinates are excluded from distance scoring. Shared descendant profiles are removed before branch-name comparison. A candidate already recorded as a parent-in-law is excluded. A confident or independently supported parent is treated as settled; uncertain and unassessed attachments remain open to alternative comparison. A different linked parent, an uncle/aunt or grandparent path, and a matching existing child profile prevent an alternative from being classified as a strong direct-parent lead until the underlying tree conflict or duplicate is resolved. Familiar forms such as Bessie are normalised. Surname remains an eligibility filter worth zero points.

Naming customs, shared farms and occupations are circumstantial. Children, spouses and collateral relatives may be missing, and tree-derived family networks are not independent evidence. Scores rank research leads; they do not prove parentage.

Same-name candidate

Wilson GlasgowGlasgow-2099

Automated fit23/100
Similar Person
Dates1833–?PlacesGeorgia, United StatesParent comparisonNo shared parent is indexed
Why it may fit
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 9 (+10)

unassessed father attachments differ (−5)

Full comparison detail
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 9 (+10)

Conflicts: unassessed father attachments differ (−5)

Open side-by-side comparison

Same-name candidate

Wilson A GlasgowGlasgow-1215

Automated fit18/100
Similar Person
Dates1862–1930PlacesLafayette, Arkansas, United States → Lafayette, Arkansas, United StatesParent comparisonNo shared parent is indexed
Why it may fit
  • same first and last name (+18)

record-derived birth estimates differ by 38; retained without deduction

Full comparison detail
  • same first and last name (+18)

Conflicts: record-derived birth estimates differ by 38; retained without deduction

Open side-by-side comparison
How duplicate leads are calculated

Dates are eligibility gates, not merely deductions: chronologically impossible people are excluded. Dates, places, spouses, parent certainty and children's profiles and names are then compared. A high score is a prompt to inspect records, not a merge recommendation.

Open only what you need

Research & records

Life and record timelineChronological mapped occurrences and their underlying sources.1 record
b. 1824

Profile-stated birthplace: South Carolina, USA

South Carolina, USA

One-Tree export profile fields are search leads, not sources; relationships are shown only where the export supplies parent links.

One-Tree profile leadunknown
Source and mapping detail

WikiTree profile export for Glasgow-405

No sufficiently specific citation match found.

Precision: Country-centre fallback for profile locality

Evidence assessmentWhat is supported, uncertain or disputed in the current case model.17 claims
3Derivative
1Tree Only
1Unknown

Documented or strongly supported

No claims in this category have been formally assessed.

Working hypotheses and conflicts

No claims in this category have been formally assessed.

Research questionsOpen problems, missing bridges and the next records to inspect.0 open

No formal open question is recorded for this person.

Sources and provenanceStructured citations and source-quality classifications.5 sources

Source or provenance: quality describes the record layer, not every conclusion drawn from it.

  1. unknown 1850 US Census
  2. derivative "United States Census, 1850," database with images, FamilySearch (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:MZYL-G95 : 20 December 2020), Wilson A Glasgow, Floyd Springs, Floyd, Georgia, United States; citing family , NARA microfilm publication (Washington, D.C.: National Archives and Records Administration, n.d.).
  3. derivative "United States Census, 1870", database with images, FamilySearch (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:MHK1-W4N : 28 May 2021), W A Glassgow, 1870.
  4. derivative "Alabama County Marriages, 1809-1950," database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:QKMB-QG66 : 19 February 2021), Wilson A Glasgow and Sealy Ann Bohanan, 07 Nov 1844; citing Chambers, Alabama, United States, County Probate Courts, Alabama; FHL microfilm 1,863,225.
  5. tree_only WikiTree profile export for Glasgow-405
Technical profile and raw captureDataset metadata, machine dossier and captured WikiTree biography.Advanced

WikiTree profile information

Dataset: ONT_Glasco_2026-08-18T16_05.json · generated 2026-08-20

Machine-readable dossier

WikiTree biography, citations and relationship snapshot

Glasgow-405 was captured 2026-08-07T09:54:35+00:00; WikiTree profile revision 2025-10-13.

Profile location claims

EventDateLocationStatus
birth—South Carolina, USAWikiTree profile field
marriage1844-11-07Chambers, Alabama, United StatesWikiTree relationship field

Immediate relationship snapshot

RelationshipPersonWikiTree IDDates and places returned
ParentsRobert GlasgowGlasgow-22981800-00-00 · Newberry, South Carolina, United States · 1869-00-00 · Georgia, United States
ChildrenJohn H GlasgowGlasgow-19751846-00-00 · Alabama, United States · 0000-00-00
ChildrenJames M GlasgowGlasgow-19761849-00-00 · Georgia, United States · 0000-00-00
ChildrenGeorge Washington GlasgowGlasgow-3981849-11-00 · Georgia, United States · 1940-00-00
ChildrenSarah J GlasgowGlasgow-19771854-00-00 · Georgia, United States · 0000-00-00
ChildrenRobert Kouchan GlasgowGlasgow-19781857-00-00 · Georgia, United States · 1927-00-00 · Vernon, Lamar, Alabama, United States
ChildrenWilliam Jefferson GlasgowGlasgow-4061858-09-20 · Georgia, United States · 1924-06-12 · Lamar County, Alabama, USA
ChildrenIsaac N GlasgowGlasgow-19791862-00-00 · Alabama, United States · 1923-01-12 · Lamar, Alabama, United States
ChildrenAlonzo GlasgowGlasgow-19801864-00-00 · Alabama, United States · 0000-00-00
ChildrenFrancis M GlasgowGlasgow-19811868-00-00 · Alabama, United States · 0000-00-00
SiblingsElizabeth GlasgowGlasgow-23011823-00-00 · South Carolina, United States · 0000-00-00
SiblingsJohn F GlasgowGlasgow-23001825-00-00 · South Carolina, United States · 0000-00-00
SiblingsMary Amanda McDonaldGlasgow-22741829-05-05 · Alabama, United States · 1898-09-14 · Jefferson, Alabama, United States
SiblingsRobert L GlasgowGlasgow-23021832-00-00 · Georgia, United States · 0000-00-00
SiblingsElizabeth L GlasgowGlasgow-23031835-00-00 · Georgia, United States · 0000-00-00
SpousesCelia A. GlasgowBohannon-3371825-00-00 · Georgia, United States · 1890-00-00 · Lamar County, Alabama, USA · 1844-11-07 · Chambers, Alabama, United States

Profile categories

Lamar County, Alabama Lamar_County,_Alabama

Record-bearing passages

  • BiographySources Family Records of Mary Atkins:

    • 1850 US Census
    • "United States Census, 1850," database with images, FamilySearch (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:MZYL-G95 : 20 December 2020), Wilson A Glasgow, Floyd Springs, Floyd, Georgia, United States; citing family , NARA microfilm publication (Washington, D.C.: National Archives and Records Administration, n.d.).
    • "United States Census, 1870", database with images, FamilySearch (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:MHK1-W4N : 28 May 2021), W A Glassgow, 1870.
    • "Alabama County Marriages, 1809-1950," database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:QKMB-QG66 : 19 February 2021), Wilson A Glasgow and Sealy Ann Bohanan, 07 Nov 1844; citing Chambers, Alabama, United States, County Probate Courts, Alabama; FHL microfilm 1,863,225.

Profile source citations

  1. 1850 US Census
  2. "United States Census, 1850," database with images, FamilySearch (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:MZYL-G95 : 20 December 2020), Wilson A Glasgow, Floyd Springs, Floyd, Georgia, United States; citing family , NARA microfilm publication (Washington, D.C.: National Archives and Records Administration, n.d.). source link 1
  3. "United States Census, 1870", database with images, FamilySearch (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:MHK1-W4N : 28 May 2021), W A Glassgow, 1870. source link 1
  4. "Alabama County Marriages, 1809-1950," database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:QKMB-QG66 : 19 February 2021), Wilson A Glasgow and Sealy Ann Bohanan, 07 Nov 1844; citing Chambers, Alabama, United States, County Probate Courts, Alabama; FHL microfilm 1,863,225. source link 1
Full captured biography text
BiographySources
Family Records of Mary Atkins: 
* 1850 US Census 
* "United States Census, 1850," database with images, FamilySearch (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:MZYL-G95 : 20 December 2020), Wilson A Glasgow, Floyd Springs, Floyd, Georgia, United States; citing family , NARA microfilm publication (Washington, D.C.: National Archives and Records Administration, n.d.).
* "United States Census, 1870", database with images, FamilySearch (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:MHK1-W4N : 28 May 2021), W A Glassgow, 1870.
* "Alabama County Marriages, 1809-1950," database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:QKMB-QG66 : 19 February 2021), Wilson A Glasgow and Sealy Ann Bohanan, 07 Nov 1844; citing Chambers, Alabama, United States, County Probate Courts, Alabama; FHL microfilm 1,863,225.
Raw WikiTree biography markup
[[Category: Lamar County, Alabama]]  
== Biography ==

== Sources ==
<references />
Family Records of [[Atkins-2361|Mary Atkins]]:  
* 1850 US Census    
* "United States Census, 1850," database with images, FamilySearch (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:MZYL-G95 : 20 December 2020), Wilson A Glasgow, Floyd Springs, Floyd, Georgia, United States; citing family , NARA microfilm publication  (Washington, D.C.: National Archives and Records Administration, n.d.).
* "United States Census, 1870", database with images, FamilySearch (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:MHK1-W4N : 28 May 2021), W A Glassgow, 1870.
* "Alabama County Marriages, 1809-1950," database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:QKMB-QG66 : 19 February 2021), Wilson A Glasgow and Sealy Ann Bohanan, 07 Nov 1844; citing Chambers, Alabama, United States, County Probate Courts, Alabama; FHL microfilm 1,863,225.