Individual research record
Robert Glasgow
c. 1800 – c. 1869
Glasgow-2298 · 1 mapped association
At a glance
Identity & family
Tree links organise the family; documentary status still varies.
- Birth
- c. 1800 · Newberry, South Carolina, United States
- Death
- c. 1869 · Georgia, United States
- Parents
- Wilson Crossier GlasgowprobableMary (McCracken) Glasgowprobable
- Spouses
- Elizabeth (Unknown) Glasgow
- Children
- Elizabeth GlasgowElizabeth L GlasgowJohn F GlasgowMary Amanda (Glasgow) McDonaldRobert L GlasgowWilson Archibald Glasgow
- Gender
- Male
- WikiTree
- Glasgow-2298
- Research clusters
- Worldwide One-Tree profile leads
- Mapped descendants
- 35
Comparison context
These child positions and checks are the subject details used to rank possible parents below.
Naming sequence used by the parentage model
Known-position checks: 1 support · 0 conflict. Ordinals retain unnamed children and recognise reused names.
Relationship comparison
Potential parents or duplicates
Compare scored leads with the subject details above—not proof.
Possible fathers5 leads
Possible Father
William GlasgowGlasgow-357
- plausible 43-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 66 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1823), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- weak broad-area overlap: carolina (+1; not a locality match)
a different father is strongly supported (−30; Probable; estate-party reconstruction); candidate's household recorded Sophia Glasgow in Currituck, North Carolina, United States within 1 years of the subject (−12; no contemporaneous child is indexed in the subject's locality)
Show complete scoring
- plausible 43-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 66 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1823), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- weak broad-area overlap: carolina (+1; not a locality match)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
- subject's birth fits within the candidate's overall child-bearing span (1781–1801) (+3; children are not tied to one spouse)
- candidate's other children share uncommon given names with the subject's recorded siblings: Ruth +12 (15 public profiles) (+12 total)
- uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Francis +12 (11 public profiles; subject branch: Francis M Glasgow; candidate branch: Francis Marion Glasgow); Isaac +12 (13 public profiles; subject branch: Isaac N Glasgow; candidate branch: Isaac Wesley (Glascow) Glasgow); Susan +8 (18 public profiles; subject branch: Susan Sarah Jane (Glasgow) Barnes; candidate branch: Susan Caroline Glasgow) (+40 total including +8 multi-name bonus)
Deductions and cautions: a different father is strongly supported (−30; Probable; estate-party reconstruction); candidate's household recorded Sophia Glasgow in Currituck, North Carolina, United States within 1 years of the subject (−12; no contemporaneous child is indexed in the subject's locality)
Possible Father
Isaac Wesley (Glascow) GlasgowGlascow-14
- 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): collateral network, household chronology, naming
- the nominal 14-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (16–24 years) (+4)
- candidate's birth is 37 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1823), a marginal two-generation interval (+1)
a different father is strongly supported (−30; Probable; estate-party reconstruction); parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction); no known spouse has a plausible maternal age at the subject's birth (−6; an unknown spouse remains possible)
Show complete scoring
- the nominal 14-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (16–24 years) (+4)
- candidate's birth is 37 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1823), a marginal two-generation interval (+1)
- weak broad-area overlap: carolina (+1; not a locality match)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
- uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Francis +12 (11 public profiles; subject branch: Francis M Glasgow; candidate branch: Francis Marion Glasgow); Isaac +12 (13 public profiles; subject branch: Isaac N Glasgow; candidate branch: Isaac Carrington Glasgow); Susan +8 (18 public profiles; subject branch: Susan Sarah Jane (Glasgow) Barnes; candidate branch: Susan Caroline Glasgow) (+40 total including +8 multi-name bonus)
- candidate's sibling and niece/nephew network repeats names in the subject's descendant line (three rarest at most): Ruth +12 (15 public profiles; sibling Ruth Glasgow) (+12 total)
- uncommon spouse surnames recur across the subject and candidate branches: Clark +6 (+6 total)
- 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): collateral network, household chronology, naming
Deductions and cautions: a different father is strongly supported (−30; Probable; estate-party reconstruction); parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction); no known spouse has a plausible maternal age at the subject's birth (−6; an unknown spouse remains possible)
Show 3 lower-scoring possible fathers
Possible Father
Jesse GlasgowGlasgow-768
- plausible 39-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 62 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1823), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- weak broad-area overlap: carolina (+1; not a locality match)
a different father is strongly supported (−30; Probable; estate-party reconstruction)
Show complete scoring
- plausible 39-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 62 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1823), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- weak broad-area overlap: carolina (+1; not a locality match)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
- candidate's sibling and niece/nephew network repeats names in the subject's descendant line (three rarest at most): Isaac +12 (13 public profiles; niece/nephew Isaac Wesley (Glascow) Glasgow); Ruth +12 (15 public profiles; niece/nephew Ruth Glasgow) (+24 total)
- candidate's parents' names recur among the subject's grandchildren: Ruth +5 (+5 total; weak multigeneration clue)
Deductions and cautions: a different father is strongly supported (−30; Probable; estate-party reconstruction)
Possible Father
Caleb GlasgowGlasgow-220
- possible 19-year parent-child age gap (+10)
- candidate's birth is 42 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1823), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- weak broad-area overlap: carolina (+1; not a locality match)
a different father is strongly supported (−30; Probable; estate-party reconstruction)
Show complete scoring
- possible 19-year parent-child age gap (+10)
- candidate's birth is 42 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1823), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- weak broad-area overlap: carolina (+1; not a locality match)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
- candidate's sibling and niece/nephew network repeats names in the subject's descendant line (three rarest at most): Francis +12 (11 public profiles; niece/nephew Francis Marion Glasgow); Isaac +12 (13 public profiles; sibling Isaac Wesley Glasgow); Ruth +12 (15 public profiles; sibling Ruth Glasgow) (+36 total)
Deductions and cautions: a different father is strongly supported (−30; Probable; estate-party reconstruction)
Possible Father
John S. Glasgow Jr.Glasgow-664
- plausible 23-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- known spouse Elizabeth Jane (Bell) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (26) at the subject's birth (+7)
- candidate's birth is 46 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1823), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
a different father is strongly supported (−30; Probable; estate-party reconstruction); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)
Show complete scoring
- plausible 23-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 46 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1823), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- known spouse Elizabeth Jane (Bell) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (26) at the subject's birth (+7)
- candidate's name matches the first dated son John F Glasgow, the expected father position for a male subject (+5; catalogue rarity 0, John in 278 profiles)
- family naming controls: 1 supporting and 0 conflicting known positions (already reflected in naming weight)
- uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Susan +8 (18 public profiles; subject branch: Susan Sarah Jane (Glasgow) Barnes; candidate branch: Susan E (Glasgow) Troxell); George +3 (61 public profiles; subject branch: George Washington Glasgow; candidate branch: George L Glasgow); Nancy +3 (49 public profiles; subject branch: Nancy A Glasgow; candidate branch: Nancy (Glasgow) Brubaker) (+22 total including +8 multi-name bonus)
Deductions and cautions: a different father is strongly supported (−30; Probable; estate-party reconstruction); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)
Possible mothers5 leads
Possible Mother
Rachel McCrackinGlasgow-3978
- plausible 25-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate is associated with the subject's stated birthplace, but not by a reliable near-contemporary record (+10)
- 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming
a different mother is strongly supported (−30; Probable; estate-party reconstruction)
Show complete scoring
- plausible 25-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 48 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1823), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- candidate is associated with the subject's stated birthplace, but not by a reliable near-contemporary record (+10)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
- candidate's sibling and niece/nephew network repeats names in the subject's descendant line (three rarest at most): Wilson +14 (4 public profiles; sibling Wilson Crossier Glasgow); Ruth +12 (15 public profiles; niece/nephew Ruth Glasgow) (+26 total)
- 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming
Deductions and cautions: a different mother is strongly supported (−30; Probable; estate-party reconstruction)
Possible Mother
Margaret KinardGlasgow-3977
- plausible 27-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate is associated with the subject's stated birthplace, but not by a reliable near-contemporary record (+10)
- 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming
a different mother is strongly supported (−30; Probable; estate-party reconstruction)
Show complete scoring
- plausible 27-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 50 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1823), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- candidate is associated with the subject's stated birthplace, but not by a reliable near-contemporary record (+10)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
- candidate's sibling and niece/nephew network repeats names in the subject's descendant line (three rarest at most): Wilson +14 (4 public profiles; sibling Wilson Crossier Glasgow); Ruth +12 (15 public profiles; niece/nephew Ruth Glasgow) (+26 total)
- 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming
Deductions and cautions: a different mother is strongly supported (−30; Probable; estate-party reconstruction)
Show 3 lower-scoring possible mothers
Possible Mother
Dosha (Cannady) GlasgowCannady-99
- 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): collateral network, household chronology, naming
- the nominal 8-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (15–18 years) (+4)
- candidate's birth is 31 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1823), a marginal two-generation interval (+1)
a different mother is strongly supported (−30; Probable; estate-party reconstruction); parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction)
Show complete scoring
- the nominal 8-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (15–18 years) (+4)
- candidate's birth is 31 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1823), a marginal two-generation interval (+1)
- weak broad-area overlap: carolina (+1; not a locality match)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
- uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Francis +12 (11 public profiles; subject branch: Francis M Glasgow; candidate branch: Francis Marion Glasgow); Isaac +12 (13 public profiles; subject branch: Isaac N Glasgow; candidate branch: Isaac Carrington Glasgow); Susan +8 (18 public profiles; subject branch: Susan Sarah Jane (Glasgow) Barnes; candidate branch: Susan Caroline Glasgow) (+40 total including +8 multi-name bonus)
- uncommon spouse surnames recur across the subject and candidate branches: Clark +6 (+6 total)
- the candidate's own child family has 2 known-position naming matches (+3; branch-level validation)
- 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): collateral network, household chronology, naming
Deductions and cautions: a different mother is strongly supported (−30; Probable; estate-party reconstruction); parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction)
Possible Mother
Ruth GlasgowGlasgow-334
- plausible 18-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 41 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1823), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- weak broad-area overlap: carolina (+1; not a locality match)
a different mother is strongly supported (−30; Probable; estate-party reconstruction)
Show complete scoring
- plausible 18-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 41 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1823), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- weak broad-area overlap: carolina (+1; not a locality match)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
- candidate's sibling and niece/nephew network repeats names in the subject's descendant line (three rarest at most): Francis +12 (11 public profiles; niece/nephew Francis Marion Glasgow); Isaac +12 (13 public profiles; sibling Isaac Wesley Glasgow); Susan +8 (18 public profiles; niece/nephew Susan Caroline Glasgow) (+32 total)
Deductions and cautions: a different mother is strongly supported (−30; Probable; estate-party reconstruction)
Possible Mother
Love GlasgowGlasgow-302
- possible 15-year parent-child age gap (+10)
- candidate's birth is 38 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1823), a marginal two-generation interval (+1)
- weak broad-area overlap: carolina (+1; not a locality match)
a different mother is strongly supported (−30; Probable; estate-party reconstruction)
Show complete scoring
- possible 15-year parent-child age gap (+10)
- candidate's birth is 38 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1823), a marginal two-generation interval (+1)
- weak broad-area overlap: carolina (+1; not a locality match)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
- candidate's sibling and niece/nephew network repeats names in the subject's descendant line (three rarest at most): Francis +12 (11 public profiles; niece/nephew Francis Marion Glasgow); Isaac +12 (13 public profiles; sibling Isaac Wesley Glasgow); Ruth +12 (15 public profiles; sibling Ruth Glasgow) (+36 total)
Deductions and cautions: a different mother is strongly supported (−30; Probable; estate-party reconstruction)
How parent leads are calculated
Automated leads use birth surnames—not married surnames—as parental eligibility, role-specific biological age limits, bounded and approximate-date uncertainty, household chronology, specific time-aware localities, mapped distance, tenancy succession, migration destinations and sex-aware Scottish naming positions across generations. People already attached as the subject's parents stay in the identity summary and are excluded from this alternative-candidate list, regardless of relationship confidence. The main calibration uses clues available on disconnected profiles; existing parent and sibling links are retained as comparison context rather than treated as transferable evidence. Common ordered names and grandparent-to-child echoes receive a small non-zero weight, so a John or James match can support several independent criteria without producing a lead alone. Rare names, repeated bearers and bundles across otherwise distinct branches receive substantially more weight according to catalogue frequency. An exact migration place is weighted by its rarity and repetition across both branches; a shared destination country is worth only one point. Extra weight is added only when at least three independent clue types converge: naming, locality, specific migration, household chronology or collateral networks. Sparse profiles retain a clearly labelled chronology-only fallback instead of disappearing. Countries, states, counties and research clusters do not count as a shared locality, and fallback, broad representative or kin-inferred coordinates are excluded from distance scoring. Shared descendant profiles are removed before branch-name comparison. A candidate already recorded as a parent-in-law is excluded. A confident or independently supported parent is treated as settled; uncertain and unassessed attachments remain open to alternative comparison. A different linked parent, an uncle/aunt or grandparent path, and a matching existing child profile prevent an alternative from being classified as a strong direct-parent lead until the underlying tree conflict or duplicate is resolved. Familiar forms such as Bessie are normalised. Surname remains an eligibility filter worth zero points.
Naming customs, shared farms and occupations are circumstantial. Children, spouses and collateral relatives may be missing, and tree-derived family networks are not independent evidence. Scores rank research leads; they do not prove parentage.
Same-name candidate
Robert GlasgowGlasgow-3428
- same first and last name (+18)
- same birth year (+30)
- child given-name pattern overlaps: Robert
No indexed conflict
Full comparison detail
- same first and last name (+18)
- same birth year (+30)
- child given-name pattern overlaps: Robert
Conflicts: No indexed conflict
Same-name candidate
Robert GlasgowGlasgow-4010
- same first and last name (+18)
- birth years within 1 (+25)
- death years within 3 (+5)
No indexed conflict
Full comparison detail
- same first and last name (+18)
- birth years within 1 (+25)
- death years within 3 (+5)
- child given-name pattern overlaps: Mary
Conflicts: No indexed conflict
How duplicate leads are calculated
Dates are eligibility gates, not merely deductions: chronologically impossible people are excluded. Dates, places, spouses, parent certainty and children's profiles and names are then compared. A high score is a prompt to inspect records, not a merge recommendation.
Open only what you need
Research & records
Life and record timelineChronological mapped occurrences and their underlying sources.1 record
Profile-stated birthplace: Newberry, South Carolina, United States
Newberry, South Carolina, United States
One-Tree export profile fields are search leads, not sources; relationships are shown only where the export supplies parent links.
Source and mapping detail
WikiTree profile export for Glasgow-2298
No sufficiently specific citation match found.
Precision: Country-centre fallback for profile locality
Evidence assessmentWhat is supported, uncertain or disputed in the current case model.10 claims
Documented or strongly supported
No claims in this category have been formally assessed.
Working hypotheses and conflicts
Robert Glasgow was probable son of Wilson Crossier Glasgow
The Wilson Glasgow real-estate index lists widow Mary and seven associated people including Robert; Mary's will says she had seven children but names only Ruth, Mariah and Hiram. Robert's exact relationship requires the packet.
Robert Glasgow was probable son of Mary (McCracken) Glasgow
The real-estate index lists Mary with Robert, Ruth, Naomi, Matilda, Hiram, Almina and Maria; the count agrees with Mary's will, but the index does not print a kin term for Robert.
Research questionsOpen problems, missing bridges and the next records to inspect.0 open
No formal open question is recorded for this person.
Sources and provenanceStructured citations and source-quality classifications.6 sources
Source or provenance: quality describes the record layer, not every conclusion drawn from it.
- derivative "Alabama County Marriages, 1809-1950," database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:QKMB-QG6X : 19 February 2021), Robert Glasgow in entry for Wilson A Glasgow and Sealy Ann Bohanan, 07 Nov 1844; citing Chambers, Alabama, United States, County Probate Courts, Alabama; FHL microfilm 1,863,225.
- derivative "United States Census, 1850," database with images, FamilySearch (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:MZYL-G9N : 20 December 2020), Robert Glassgow, Floyd Springs, Floyd, Georgia, United States; citing family , NARA microfilm publication (Washington, D.C.: National Archives and Records Administration, n.d.).
- tree_only "Ancestry Family Tree" (https://www.ancestry.com/family-tree/tree/38798304/family?cfpid=302144717438)
- tree_only WikiTree profile export for Glasgow-2298
- derivative The Wilson Glasgow real-estate index
- derivative Newberry District, South Carolina, Will Book N, p. 1, will of Mary Glasgow, widow of Wilson Glasgow, dated 28 November 1837 and proved 22 October 1838; transcription (https://web.archive.org/web/20101124184247id_/http://www.lifesweaving.com/Glasgow/Paper_WilsonGlasgowWife.html). The displayed recording date of July 1837 precedes execution and is evidently a transcription error.
Technical profile and raw captureDataset metadata, machine dossier and captured WikiTree biography.Advanced
WikiTree profile information
Glasgow-2298
Robert Glasgow
Updated 2022-06-16
Dataset: ONT_Glasco_2026-08-18T16_05.json · generated 2026-08-20
WikiTree biography, citations and relationship snapshot
Glasgow-2298 was captured 2026-08-07T09:54:35+00:00; WikiTree profile revision 2022-06-16.
Profile location claims
| Event | Date | Location | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| birth | — | Newberry, South Carolina, United States | WikiTree profile field |
| death | — | Georgia, United States | WikiTree profile field |
Immediate relationship snapshot
| Relationship | Person | WikiTree ID | Dates and places returned |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parents | Wilson Crossier Glasgow | Glasgow-1982 | 1772-00-00 · Kilwaughter, Larne, County Antrim, Ireland · 1817-09-11 · Newberry, South Carolina, United States |
| Children | Elizabeth Glasgow | Glasgow-2301 | 1823-00-00 · South Carolina, United States · 0000-00-00 |
| Children | Wilson Archibald Glasgow | Glasgow-405 | 1824-00-00 · South Carolina, USA · 0000-00-00 |
| Children | John F Glasgow | Glasgow-2300 | 1825-00-00 · South Carolina, United States · 0000-00-00 |
| Children | Mary Amanda McDonald | Glasgow-2274 | 1829-05-05 · Alabama, United States · 1898-09-14 · Jefferson, Alabama, United States |
| Children | Robert L Glasgow | Glasgow-2302 | 1832-00-00 · Georgia, United States · 0000-00-00 |
| Children | Elizabeth L Glasgow | Glasgow-2303 | 1835-00-00 · Georgia, United States · 0000-00-00 |
| Spouses | Elizabeth Glasgow | Unknown-607112 | 1795-00-00 · South Carolina, United States · 1885-00-00 · Warrior, Jefferson, Alabama, United States · 0000-00-00 |
Record-bearing passages
- BiographyResearch Notes Robert was born in Newberry, South Carolina, and was buried in Gordon County, Georgia. The 1850 census shows him born in South Carolina and living in Floyd County, Georgia.
- Ages and birthplaces from the 1850 census suggest that the family moved from South Carolina to Georgia sometime between 1823 and 1830.
- The 1850 census showing Robert's household spans two pages. It shows three women named Elizabeth living in the household, ages 55, 27, and 15. Elizabeth age 55 is presumably John's wife. Elizabeth age 27 was born in South Carolina and Elizabeth L age 15 was born in Georgia. One of the Elizabeths may have been a niece or other relative rather than a daughter.
The 1850 census also shows that the adjacent dwelling was occupied by the Wilson (https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Glasgow-405) and Cecilia (https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Bohannon-337) Glasgow and their three children. Sources
- "Alabama County Marriages, 1809-1950," database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:QKMB-QG6X : 19 February 2021), Robert Glasgow in entry for Wilson A Glasgow and Sealy Ann Bohanan, 07 Nov 1844; citing Chambers, Alabama, United States, County Probate Courts, Alabama; FHL microfilm 1,863,225.
- "United States Census, 1850," database with images, FamilySearch (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:MZYL-G9N : 20 December 2020), Robert Glassgow, Floyd Springs, Floyd, Georgia, United States; citing family , NARA microfilm publication (Washington, D.C.: National Archives and Records Administration, n.d.).
- *"Ancestry Family Tree" (https://www.ancestry.com/family-tree/tree/38798304/family?cfpid=302144717438)
Profile source citations
- "Alabama County Marriages, 1809-1950," database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:QKMB-QG6X : 19 February 2021), Robert Glasgow in entry for Wilson A Glasgow and Sealy Ann Bohanan, 07 Nov 1844; citing Chambers, Alabama, United States, County Probate Courts, Alabama; FHL microfilm 1,863,225. source link 1
- "United States Census, 1850," database with images, FamilySearch (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:MZYL-G9N : 20 December 2020), Robert Glassgow, Floyd Springs, Floyd, Georgia, United States; citing family , NARA microfilm publication (Washington, D.C.: National Archives and Records Administration, n.d.). source link 1
- "Ancestry Family Tree" (https://www.ancestry.com/family-tree/tree/38798304/family?cfpid=302144717438) source link 1
Other external links in the profile
Full captured biography text
BiographyResearch Notes Robert was born in Newberry, South Carolina, and was buried in Gordon County, Georgia. The 1850 census shows him born in South Carolina and living in Floyd County, Georgia. Ages and birthplaces from the 1850 census suggest that the family moved from South Carolina to Georgia sometime between 1823 and 1830. The 1850 census showing Robert's household spans two pages. It shows three women named Elizabeth living in the household, ages 55, 27, and 15. Elizabeth age 55 is presumably John's wife. Elizabeth age 27 was born in South Carolina and Elizabeth L age 15 was born in Georgia. One of the Elizabeths may have been a niece or other relative rather than a daughter. The 1850 census also shows that the adjacent dwelling was occupied by the Wilson (https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Glasgow-405) and Cecilia (https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Bohannon-337) Glasgow and their three children. Sources * "Alabama County Marriages, 1809-1950," database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:QKMB-QG6X : 19 February 2021), Robert Glasgow in entry for Wilson A Glasgow and Sealy Ann Bohanan, 07 Nov 1844; citing Chambers, Alabama, United States, County Probate Courts, Alabama; FHL microfilm 1,863,225. * "United States Census, 1850," database with images, FamilySearch (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:MZYL-G9N : 20 December 2020), Robert Glassgow, Floyd Springs, Floyd, Georgia, United States; citing family , NARA microfilm publication (Washington, D.C.: National Archives and Records Administration, n.d.). * *"Ancestry Family Tree" (https://www.ancestry.com/family-tree/tree/38798304/family?cfpid=302144717438)
Raw WikiTree biography markup
== Biography ==
== Research Notes ==
Robert was born in Newberry, South Carolina, and was buried in Gordon County, Georgia. The 1850 census shows him born in South Carolina and living in Floyd County, Georgia.
Ages and birthplaces from the 1850 census suggest that the family moved from South Carolina to Georgia sometime between 1823 and 1830.
The 1850 census showing Robert's household spans two pages. It shows three women named Elizabeth living in the household, ages 55, 27, and 15. Elizabeth age 55 is presumably John's wife. Elizabeth age 27 was born in South Carolina and Elizabeth L age 15 was born in Georgia. One of the Elizabeths may have been a niece or other relative rather than a daughter.
The 1850 census also shows that the adjacent dwelling was occupied by the [https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Glasgow-405 Wilson] and [https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Bohannon-337 Cecilia] Glasgow and their three children.
== Sources ==
<references />
* "Alabama County Marriages, 1809-1950," database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:QKMB-QG6X : 19 February 2021), Robert Glasgow in entry for Wilson A Glasgow and Sealy Ann Bohanan, 07 Nov 1844; citing Chambers, Alabama, United States, County Probate Courts, Alabama; FHL microfilm 1,863,225.
* "United States Census, 1850," database with images, FamilySearch (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:MZYL-G9N : 20 December 2020), Robert Glassgow, Floyd Springs, Floyd, Georgia, United States; citing family , NARA microfilm publication (Washington, D.C.: National Archives and Records Administration, n.d.).
* {{FindAGrave|124885246}}
*[https://www.ancestry.com/family-tree/tree/38798304/family?cfpid=302144717438 "Ancestry Family Tree"]