Individual research record
John Glasgow
c. 1709 – ?
Glasgow-81 · 1 mapped association
At a glance
Identity & family
Tree links organise the family; documentary status still varies.
- Birth
- c. 1709 · Kirknewton and East Calder, Edinburghshire, Scotland
- Death
- Not recorded · Place not recorded
- Parents
- Andrew GlasgowunmarkedChristian Cookunmarked
- Spouses
- Magdalene (Guthrie) Glasgow
- Children
- Andrew GlasgowBetty (Glasgow) NicholJanet GlasgowJean GlasgowKatherine (Glasgow) NicolMagdalen GlasgowMargaret Glasgow
- Gender
- Male
- WikiTree
- Glasgow-81
- Research clusters
- Scotland One-Tree profile leads
- Mapped descendants
- 7
Comparison context
These child positions and checks are the subject details used to rank possible parents below.
Naming sequence used by the parentage model
Known-position checks: 0 support · 1 conflict. Ordinals retain unnamed children and recognise reused names.
Relationship comparison
Potential parents or duplicates
Compare scored leads with the subject details above—not proof.
Possible fathers5 leads
Possible Father
John GlasgowGlasgow-1057
- possible 48-year parent-child age gap (+10)
- 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming
- candidate's birth is 84 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1745), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15)
Show complete scoring
- possible 48-year parent-child age gap (+10)
- candidate's birth is 84 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1745), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- mapped Edinburgh is 16.2 km from the subject's birth-period Kirknewton — West Lothian (+1; one or both placements are unproved)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
- a known child was born within 8 years of the subject (+1)
- candidate and subject share the given name John (+4; weak direct parent-child name recurrence, 278 public profiles)
- uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Katherine +12 (8 public profiles; subject branch: Katherine (Glasgow) Nicol; candidate branch: Katherine Glasgow); Andrew +5 (31 public profiles; subject branch: Andrew Glasgow; candidate branch: Andrew Glasgow, Andrew Glasgow; +2 repetition bonus); Janet +3 (43 public profiles; subject branch: Janet Glasgow; candidate branch: Janet Glasgow) (+28 total including +8 multi-name bonus)
- 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming
Deductions and cautions: a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15)
Possible Father
William GlasgowGlasgow-3974
- plausible 38-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- same specific indexed locality despite wider place-label differences: kirknewton west lothian (+10)
- candidate's birth is 74 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1745), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15)
Show complete scoring
- plausible 38-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 74 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1745), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- same specific indexed locality despite wider place-label differences: kirknewton west lothian (+10)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
- the same sex-aware parent-name position recurs independently in sibling households: Andrew Glasgow → William Glasgow (+3)
Deductions and cautions: a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15)
Show 3 lower-scoring possible fathers
Possible Father
Andrew GlasgowGlasgow-1313
- same specific indexed locality despite wider place-label differences: kirknewton west lothian (+10)
- 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming
- the nominal 6-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (16–16 years) (+4)
a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction)
Show complete scoring
- the nominal 6-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (16–16 years) (+4)
- candidate's birth is 42 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1745), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- same specific indexed locality despite wider place-label differences: kirknewton west lothian (+10)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
- candidate's name matches the first dated son Andrew Glasgow, the expected father position for a male subject (+5; catalogue rarity 1, Andrew in 31 profiles)
- family naming controls: 0 supporting and 1 conflicting known positions (already reflected in naming weight)
- the same sex-aware parent-name position recurs independently in sibling households: James Glasgow → Andrew Glasgow (+3)
- 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming
Deductions and cautions: a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction)
Possible Father
William GlasgowGlasgow-1055
- the same sex-aware parent-name position recurs independently in sibling households: Andrew Glasgow → William Glasgow with spouse-position match (+7)
- the nominal 8-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (16–28 years) (+4)
- candidate's birth is 44 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1745), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)
Show complete scoring
- the nominal 8-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (16–28 years) (+4)
- candidate's birth is 44 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1745), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
- known spouse Margaret (Montfort) Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (15) at the subject's birth (+3)
- the same sex-aware parent-name position recurs independently in sibling households: Andrew Glasgow → William Glasgow with spouse-position match (+7)
- uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Katherine +12 (8 public profiles; subject branch: Katherine (Glasgow) Nicol; candidate branch: Katherine Glasgow) (+12 total)
- candidate's sibling and niece/nephew network repeats names in the subject's descendant line (three rarest at most): Andrew +3 (31 public profiles; niece/nephew Andrew Glasgow); Janet +3 (43 public profiles; niece/nephew Janet Glasgow); Jean +3 (42 public profiles; niece/nephew Jean Glasgow) (+9 total)
Deductions and cautions: a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)
Possible Father
John GlasgowGlasgow-1927
- plausible 38-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming
- candidate's birth is 74 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1745), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); candidate's household recorded Hugh Glasgow in Kilwinning, Ayrshire, Scotland within 1 years of the subject (−12; no contemporaneous child is indexed in the subject's locality); candidate already has another child named John Glasgow (Glasgow-1930) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict)
Show complete scoring
- plausible 38-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 74 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1745), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- mapped Linlithgow is 15.0 km from the subject's birth-period Kirknewton — West Lothian (+1; one or both placements are unproved)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
- subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1707–1726) (+6; other parent Mary (Gemill) Glasgow)
- known spouse Mary (Gemill) Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (23) at the subject's birth (+3)
- candidate and subject share the given name John (+4; weak direct parent-child name recurrence, 278 public profiles)
- candidate's other children share uncommon given names with the subject's recorded siblings: Andrew +3 (31 public profiles) (+3 total)
- 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming
Deductions and cautions: a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); candidate's household recorded Hugh Glasgow in Kilwinning, Ayrshire, Scotland within 1 years of the subject (−12; no contemporaneous child is indexed in the subject's locality); candidate already has another child named John Glasgow (Glasgow-1930) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict)
Possible mothers5 leads
Possible Mother
Margaret GlasgowAikman-803
- plausible 39-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- same specific indexed locality despite wider place-label differences: kirknewton west lothian (+10)
- candidate's birth is 75 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1745), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15)
Show complete scoring
- plausible 39-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 75 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1745), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- same specific indexed locality despite wider place-label differences: kirknewton west lothian (+10)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
- a known child was born within 6 years of the subject (+1)
- candidate has another child, Andrew Glasgow, born 6 years from the subject in the same specific birth locality (+4; possible sibling-household clue)
- the same sex-aware parent-name position recurs independently in sibling households: Andrew Glasgow → Margaret Glasgow (+3)
- candidate's other children share uncommon given names with the subject's recorded siblings: Andrew +3 (31 public profiles) (+3 total)
Deductions and cautions: a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15)
Possible Mother
Margaret GlasgowGlasgow-2681
- plausible 18-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming
- candidate's birth is 54 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1745), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15)
Show complete scoring
- plausible 18-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 54 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1745), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- mapped Edinburgh is 16.2 km from the subject's birth-period Kirknewton — West Lothian (+1; one or both placements are unproved)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
- a candidate spouse matches the first dated son Andrew Glasgow, the expected father position (+4; Andrew in 31 profiles)
- the same sex-aware parent-name position recurs independently in sibling households: Andrew Glasgow → Margaret Glasgow (+3)
- 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming
Deductions and cautions: a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15)
Show 3 lower-scoring possible mothers
Possible Mother
Margaret (Montfort) GlasgowMontfort-406
- the same sex-aware parent-name position recurs independently in sibling households: Andrew Glasgow → Margaret Glasgow with spouse-position match (+7)
- candidate's birth is 51 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1745), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at least 15 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15)
Show complete scoring
- bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at least 15 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
- candidate's birth is 51 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1745), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- weak broad-area overlap: west (+1; not a locality match)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
- the same sex-aware parent-name position recurs independently in sibling households: Andrew Glasgow → Margaret Glasgow with spouse-position match (+7)
- uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Katherine +12 (8 public profiles; subject branch: Katherine (Glasgow) Nicol; candidate branch: Katherine Glasgow) (+12 total)
Deductions and cautions: a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15)
Possible Mother
Margaret (Davidson) GlasgowDavidson-20783
- plausible 19-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 55 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1745), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- the same sex-aware parent-name position recurs independently in sibling households: Andrew Glasgow → Margaret Glasgow (+3)
a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction); candidate's household recorded Christian Glasgow in Glencorse, Midlothian, Scotland within 1 years of the subject (−12; no contemporaneous child is indexed in the subject's locality); candidate already has another child named John Glasgow (Glasgow-3491) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict)
Show complete scoring
- plausible 19-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 55 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1745), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
- subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1708–1720) (+6; other parent Robert Glasgow)
- the same sex-aware parent-name position recurs independently in sibling households: Andrew Glasgow → Margaret Glasgow (+3)
- candidate's other children share uncommon given names with the subject's recorded siblings: Christian +14 (5 public profiles) (+14 total)
Deductions and cautions: a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction); candidate's household recorded Christian Glasgow in Glencorse, Midlothian, Scotland within 1 years of the subject (−12; no contemporaneous child is indexed in the subject's locality); candidate already has another child named John Glasgow (Glasgow-3491) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict)
Possible Mother
Jean GlasgowGlasgow-3528
- plausible 24-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming
- candidate's birth is 60 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1745), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15)
Show complete scoring
- plausible 24-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 60 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1745), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- mapped Edinburgh is 16.2 km from the subject's birth-period Kirknewton — West Lothian (+1; one or both placements are unproved)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
- candidate's given name recurs among another recorded child (+1; Jean occurs in 42 public profiles)
- 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming
Deductions and cautions: a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15)
How parent leads are calculated
Automated leads use birth surnames—not married surnames—as parental eligibility, role-specific biological age limits, bounded and approximate-date uncertainty, household chronology, specific time-aware localities, mapped distance, tenancy succession, migration destinations and sex-aware Scottish naming positions across generations. People already attached as the subject's parents stay in the identity summary and are excluded from this alternative-candidate list, regardless of relationship confidence. The main calibration uses clues available on disconnected profiles; existing parent and sibling links are retained as comparison context rather than treated as transferable evidence. Common ordered names and grandparent-to-child echoes receive a small non-zero weight, so a John or James match can support several independent criteria without producing a lead alone. Rare names, repeated bearers and bundles across otherwise distinct branches receive substantially more weight according to catalogue frequency. An exact migration place is weighted by its rarity and repetition across both branches; a shared destination country is worth only one point. Extra weight is added only when at least three independent clue types converge: naming, locality, specific migration, household chronology or collateral networks. Sparse profiles retain a clearly labelled chronology-only fallback instead of disappearing. Countries, states, counties and research clusters do not count as a shared locality, and fallback, broad representative or kin-inferred coordinates are excluded from distance scoring. Shared descendant profiles are removed before branch-name comparison. A candidate already recorded as a parent-in-law is excluded. A confident or independently supported parent is treated as settled; uncertain and unassessed attachments remain open to alternative comparison. A different linked parent, an uncle/aunt or grandparent path, and a matching existing child profile prevent an alternative from being classified as a strong direct-parent lead until the underlying tree conflict or duplicate is resolved. Familiar forms such as Bessie are normalised. Surname remains an eligibility filter worth zero points.
Naming customs, shared farms and occupations are circumstantial. Children, spouses and collateral relatives may be missing, and tree-derived family networks are not independent evidence. Scores rank research leads; they do not prove parentage.
Same-name candidate
John GlasgowGlasgow-3490
- same first and last name (+18)
- birth years within 1 (+25)
- shared recorded place (+20)
No indexed conflict
Full comparison detail
- same first and last name (+18)
- birth years within 1 (+25)
- shared recorded place (+20)
- matching child name: Jean Glasgow
Conflicts: No indexed conflict
Same-name candidate
John GlasgowGlasgow-1544
- same first and last name (+18)
- birth years within 7 (+10)
- shared recorded place (+20)
uncertain father attachments differ (no deduction); uncertain mother attachments differ (no deduction)
Full comparison detail
- same first and last name (+18)
- birth years within 7 (+10)
- shared recorded place (+20)
Conflicts: uncertain father attachments differ (no deduction); uncertain mother attachments differ (no deduction)
Same-name candidate
John GlasgowGlasgow-3610
- same first and last name (+18)
- shared recorded place (+20)
- matching child name: Margaret Glasgow
record-derived birth estimates differ by 83; retained without deduction; unassessed father attachments differ (−5)
Full comparison detail
- same first and last name (+18)
- shared recorded place (+20)
- matching child name: Margaret Glasgow
Conflicts: record-derived birth estimates differ by 83; retained without deduction; unassessed father attachments differ (−5)
Same-name candidate
John GlasgowGlasgow-3012
- same first and last name (+18)
- shared recorded place (+20)
- matching child name: Margaret Glasgow
record-derived birth estimates differ by 60; retained without deduction; unassessed father attachments differ (−5)
Full comparison detail
- same first and last name (+18)
- shared recorded place (+20)
- matching child name: Margaret Glasgow
Conflicts: record-derived birth estimates differ by 60; retained without deduction; unassessed father attachments differ (−5)
Show 4 lower-scoring duplicate lead(s)
Same-name candidate
John GlasgowGlasgow-2847
- same first and last name (+18)
- overlapping locality (+8)
- matching child names: Jean Glasgow, Margaret Glasgow
record-derived birth estimates differ by 21; retained without deduction
Full comparison detail
- same first and last name (+18)
- overlapping locality (+8)
- matching child names: Jean Glasgow, Margaret Glasgow
Conflicts: record-derived birth estimates differ by 21; retained without deduction
Same-name candidate
John GlasgowGlasgow-1343
- same first and last name (+18)
- birth years within 18 (+2)
- shared recorded place (+20)
unassessed father attachments differ (−5); unassessed mother attachments differ (−5)
Full comparison detail
- same first and last name (+18)
- birth years within 18 (+2)
- shared recorded place (+20)
- matching child name: Jean Glasgow
Conflicts: unassessed father attachments differ (−5); unassessed mother attachments differ (−5)
Same-name candidate
John GlasgowGlasgow-3960
- same first and last name (+18)
- birth years within 2 (+25)
No indexed conflict
Full comparison detail
- same first and last name (+18)
- birth years within 2 (+25)
Conflicts: No indexed conflict
Same-name candidate
John GlasgowGlasgow-3525
- same first and last name (+18)
- birth years within 8 (+10)
- shared recorded place (+20)
unassessed father attachments differ (−5)
Full comparison detail
- same first and last name (+18)
- birth years within 8 (+10)
- shared recorded place (+20)
Conflicts: unassessed father attachments differ (−5)
How duplicate leads are calculated
Dates are eligibility gates, not merely deductions: chronologically impossible people are excluded. Dates, places, spouses, parent certainty and children's profiles and names are then compared. A high score is a prompt to inspect records, not a merge recommendation.
Open only what you need
Research & records
Life and record timelineChronological mapped occurrences and their underlying sources.1 record
Profile-stated birthplace: Kirknewton and East Calder, Edinburghshire, Scotland
One-Tree export profile fields are search leads, not sources; relationships are shown only where the export supplies parent links.
Source and mapping detail
WikiTree profile export for Glasgow-81
No sufficiently specific citation match found.
Precision: Settlement/parish centrepoint
Evidence assessmentWhat is supported, uncertain or disputed in the current case model.19 claims
Documented or strongly supported
No claims in this category have been formally assessed.
Working hypotheses and conflicts
No claims in this category have been formally assessed.
Research questionsOpen problems, missing bridges and the next records to inspect.0 open
No formal open question is recorded for this person.
Sources and provenanceStructured citations and source-quality classifications.2 sources
Source or provenance: quality describes the record layer, not every conclusion drawn from it.
- unknown Entered by Helen Haston, Mar 6, 2013
- tree_only WikiTree profile export for Glasgow-81
Technical profile and raw captureDataset metadata, machine dossier and captured WikiTree biography.Advanced
WikiTree profile information
Glasgow-81
John Glasgow
Updated 2025-04-22
Dataset: ONT_Glasco_2026-08-18T16_05.json · generated 2026-08-20
WikiTree biography, citations and relationship snapshot
Glasgow-81 was captured 2026-08-07T09:54:35+00:00; WikiTree profile revision 2025-04-22.
Profile location claims
| Event | Date | Location | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| birth | — | Kirknewton and East Calder, Edinburghshire, Scotland | WikiTree profile field |
| marriage | 1738-06-23 | Penicuik, Midlothian, Scotland | WikiTree relationship field |
Immediate relationship snapshot
| Relationship | Person | WikiTree ID | Dates and places returned |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parents | Andrew Glasgow | Glasgow-1546 | 1685-00-00 · Kirknewton and East Calder, Midlothian, Scotland · 0000-00-00 |
| Parents | Christian Cook | Cook-36136 | 1680-00-00 · Kirknewton, Linlithgowshire, Scotland · 0000-00-00 |
| Children | Jean Glasgow | Glasgow-1332 | 1745-02-03 · West Calder, Midlothian, Scotland · 0000-00-00 |
| Children | Andrew Glasgow | Glasgow-1333 | 1747-01-11 · West Calder, Midlothian, Scotland · 0000-00-00 |
| Children | Magdalen Glasgow | Glasgow-1331 | 1749-01-29 · West Calder, Midlothian, Scotland · 0000-00-00 |
| Children | Janet Glasgow | Glasgow-1329 | 1751-08-18 · West Calder, Midlothian, Scotland · 0000-00-00 |
| Children | Margaret Glasgow | Glasgow-1330 | 1753-12-13 · West Calder, Midlothian, Scotland · 0000-00-00 |
| Children | Miss Betty Nichol | Glasgow-82 | 1755-00-00 · 0000-00-00 |
| Children | Katherine Nicol | Glasgow-80 | 1756-00-00 · West Calder, Midlothian, Scotland · 0000-00-00 |
| Siblings | Mary Glasgow | Glasgow-1548 | 1701-03-30 · Kirknewton, Linlithgowshire, Scotland · 0000-00-00 |
| Siblings | James Glasgow | Glasgow-1547 | 1702-09-09 · Kirknewton, Linlithgowshire, Scotland · 0000-00-00 |
| Siblings | Mary Glasgow | Glasgow-1335 | 1707-04-04 · Kirknewton, Linlithgowshire, Scotland · 0000-00-00 |
| Siblings | Grace Glasgow | Glasgow-1339 | 1711-08-24 · Kirknewton, Linlithgowshire, Scotland · 0000-00-00 |
| Siblings | Christian Glasgow | Glasgow-1337 | 1713-04-24 · Kirknewton, Linlithgowshire, Scotland · 0000-00-00 |
| Siblings | Andrew Glasgow | Glasgow-1336 | 1714-11-11 · Kirknewton, Linlithgowshire, Scotland · 0000-00-00 |
| Siblings | Elizabeth Glasgow | Glasgow-1338 | 1717-09-15 · Kirknewton, Linlithgowshire, Scotland · 0000-00-00 |
| Siblings | Bessie Glasgow | Glasgow-1340 | 1719-04-05 · Kirknewton, Linlithgowshire, Scotland · 0000-00-00 |
| Spouses | Magdalene Glasgow | Guthrie-777 | 1718-00-00 · Scotland · 0000-00-00 · 1738-06-23 · Penicuik, Midlothian, Scotland |
Record-bearing passages
- Do you have information about Glasgow? Please contribute to his biography. Everything on WikiTree is a collaborative work-in-progress. Sources No sources. The events of John's life were either witnessed by Helen Haston or Helen plans to add sources here later. FootnotesAcknowledgments Thanks to Helen Haston for starting this profile.
Profile source citations
- Entered by Helen Haston, Mar 6, 2013
Full captured biography text
Biography John Glasgow ... Entered by Helen Haston, Mar 6, 2013 Do you have information about Glasgow? Please contribute to his biography. Everything on WikiTree is a collaborative work-in-progress. Sources No sources. The events of John's life were either witnessed by Helen Haston or Helen plans to add sources here later. FootnotesAcknowledgments Thanks to Helen Haston for starting this profile. Click the Changes tab for the details of contributions by Helen and others.
Raw WikiTree biography markup
== Biography == John Glasgow ... <ref>Entered by Helen Haston, Mar 6, 2013</ref> ''Do you have information about Glasgow? Please contribute to his biography. Everything on WikiTree is a collaborative work-in-progress.'' == Sources == ''No sources. The events of John's life were either witnessed by [[Haston-8 | Helen Haston]] or Helen plans to add [[sources]] here later.'' === Footnotes === <references /> == Acknowledgments == Thanks to [[Haston-8 | Helen Haston]] for starting this profile. Click the Changes tab for the details of contributions by Helen and others. <!-- Please feel free to improve-upon information you see here. Be bold and experiment! If you make a mistake you can always see the previous version of the text on the Changes page. -->