Glasgow Surname Project

Individual research record

Jane Glasgow

c. 1783 – after 1848

Unknown-764117 · 1 mapped association

Birthplace unknownDeath place unknown

At a glance

Identity & family

Tree links organise the family; documentary status still varies.

1Mapped records
3Close relations
3Evidence items
7Candidate leads
Birth
c. 1783 · Place not recorded
Death
after 1848 · Place not recorded
Parents
Not recorded
Spouses
John Glasgow
Children
John B Glasgow Jr.William Glasgow
Gender
Female
WikiTree
Unknown-764117
Research clusters
Ireland One-Tree profile leads
Mapped descendants
6

Comparison context

These child positions and checks are the subject details used to rank possible parents below.

Naming sequence used by the parentage model

Paternal grandfather positionWilliam Glasgow (1811)
Maternal grandfather positionJohn B Glasgow Jr. (1814)
Maternal grandmother positionNot identifiable from dated child profiles
Paternal grandmother positionNot identifiable from dated child profiles

Known-position checks: 0 support · 1 conflict. Ordinals retain unnamed children and recognise reused names.

Relationship comparison

Potential parents or duplicates

Compare scored leads with the subject details above—not proof.

Higher-signal leadReview carefullyWeak lead

Possible mothers5 leads

Automated fit27/100
Weak Lead
Dates1750–?Generation33 years age gapRecorded placesCounty Antrim — exact locality unprovedIndependent clue breadth · 3Age · Same-Sex Generational Naming · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 33-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 61 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1811), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)

locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 33-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 61 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1811), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • candidate and subject share the given name Jane (+5; weak direct parent-child name recurrence, 71 public profiles)

Deductions and cautions: locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Automated fit22/100
Chronology-Only Fallback
Dates1761–?Generation22 years age gapRecorded placesLincolnshire, EnglandIndependent clue breadth · 2Age · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 22-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 50 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1811), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)

locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 22-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 50 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1811), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)

Deductions and cautions: locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Show 3 lower-scoring possible mothers
Automated fit22/100
Chronology-Only Fallback
Dates1760–?Generation23 years age gapRecorded placesLocation not supplied — profile holding pointIndependent clue breadth · 2Age · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 23-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 51 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1811), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)

locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 23-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 51 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1811), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)

Deductions and cautions: locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Automated fit15/100
Chronology-Only Fallback
Dates1767–1833Generation16 years age gapRecorded placesInishrush, Tamlaght O’Crilly, County Londonderry · St Nossonus — Tamlaght O'Crilly Lower graveyardIndependent clue breadth · 3Age · Household · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • possible 16-year parent-child age gap (+10)
  • candidate's birth is 44 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1811), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • a known child was born within 7 years of the subject (+1)

locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Show complete scoring
  • possible 16-year parent-child age gap (+10)
  • candidate's birth is 44 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1811), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • a known child was born within 7 years of the subject (+1)

Deductions and cautions: locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Automated fit14/100
Chronology-Only Fallback
Dates1767–1812Generation16 years age gapRecorded placesNottingham, West Nottingham Township, Chester, PennsylvaniaIndependent clue breadth · 2Age · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • possible 16-year parent-child age gap (+10)
  • candidate's birth is 44 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1811), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)

locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Show complete scoring
  • possible 16-year parent-child age gap (+10)
  • candidate's birth is 44 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1811), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)

Deductions and cautions: locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

How parent leads are calculated

Automated leads use birth surnames—not married surnames—as parental eligibility, role-specific biological age limits, bounded and approximate-date uncertainty, household chronology, specific time-aware localities, mapped distance, tenancy succession, migration destinations and sex-aware Scottish naming positions across generations. People already attached as the subject's parents stay in the identity summary and are excluded from this alternative-candidate list, regardless of relationship confidence. The main calibration uses clues available on disconnected profiles; existing parent and sibling links are retained as comparison context rather than treated as transferable evidence. Common ordered names and grandparent-to-child echoes receive a small non-zero weight, so a John or James match can support several independent criteria without producing a lead alone. Rare names, repeated bearers and bundles across otherwise distinct branches receive substantially more weight according to catalogue frequency. An exact migration place is weighted by its rarity and repetition across both branches; a shared destination country is worth only one point. Extra weight is added only when at least three independent clue types converge: naming, locality, specific migration, household chronology or collateral networks. Sparse profiles retain a clearly labelled chronology-only fallback instead of disappearing. Countries, states, counties and research clusters do not count as a shared locality, and fallback, broad representative or kin-inferred coordinates are excluded from distance scoring. Shared descendant profiles are removed before branch-name comparison. A candidate already recorded as a parent-in-law is excluded. A confident or independently supported parent is treated as settled; uncertain and unassessed attachments remain open to alternative comparison. A different linked parent, an uncle/aunt or grandparent path, and a matching existing child profile prevent an alternative from being classified as a strong direct-parent lead until the underlying tree conflict or duplicate is resolved. Familiar forms such as Bessie are normalised. Surname remains an eligibility filter worth zero points.

Naming customs, shared farms and occupations are circumstantial. Children, spouses and collateral relatives may be missing, and tree-derived family networks are not independent evidence. Scores rank research leads; they do not prove parentage.

Automated fit62/100
Similar Person
Dates1773–1858PlacesAntrim, County Antrim, Ireland → Racavan, County Antrim, IrelandParent comparisonNo shared parent is indexed
Why it may fit
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 10 (+10)
  • same spouse name (+20)

No indexed conflict

Full comparison detail
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 10 (+10)
  • same spouse name (+20)
  • matching child name: William Glasgow

Conflicts: No indexed conflict

Automated fit34/100
Similar Person
Dates1839–1891PlacesTamlaght, Cookstown, County Tyrone, Ireland → 534 Gallowgate, Glasgow.Parent comparisonNo shared parent is indexed
Why it may fit
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • shared recorded place (+20)
  • matching child name: William Glasgow

record-derived birth estimates differ by 56; retained without deduction; death years differ by 43 (−18)

Full comparison detail
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • shared recorded place (+20)
  • matching child name: William Glasgow

Conflicts: record-derived birth estimates differ by 56; retained without deduction; death years differ by 43 (−18)

How duplicate leads are calculated

Dates are eligibility gates, not merely deductions: chronologically impossible people are excluded. Dates, places, spouses, parent certainty and children's profiles and names are then compared. A high score is a prompt to inspect records, not a merge recommendation.

Open only what you need

Research & records

Latest case researchThe current conclusion from the durable research case file.Updated

Current conclusion

Unknown-764117

Jane was the wife of John Glasgow (Glasgow-1968) and mother of seven children named by the 1888 Hillsdale histories. Her maiden surname, exact birthplace and death remain unknown.

Life and record timelineChronological mapped occurrences and their underlying sources.1 record
b. 1783

Kin-inferred from spouse John Glasgow’s birthplace: Cookstown, County Tyrone, Ireland

Cookstown

One-Tree export profile fields are search leads, not sources; relationships are shown only where the export supplies parent links. This map placement is an estimate from kin and is not a directly recorded location for this person.

Kin-inferred One-Tree profile leadunknown
Source and mapping detail

WikiTree profile export for Unknown-764117

No sufficiently specific citation match found.

Precision: Kin-inferred relationship locality

Case-file source findingsSource extracts and analysis regenerated from findings.md.1 section(s)

Source findings

Unknown-764117

SourceFindingAssessment
William sketch, p. 395Calls John and Jane County Tyrone natives of Scottish parentage; names seven children; dates migration to 1844.Detailed secondary account.
John Jr. sketch, p. 688Calls both parents Scottish-born, estimates Jane about 1783, and dates migration to 1848.Detailed secondary account with conflicts.
Evidence assessmentWhat is supported, uncertain or disputed in the current case model.4 claims
2Derivative
1Tree Only

Documented or strongly supported

No claims in this category have been formally assessed.

Working hypotheses and conflicts

No claims in this category have been formally assessed.

Case-file assessments

Identity and duplicate assessment

Unknown-764117

The duplicate screen proposed Jean McConechie (McConechie-2) and Jean Bain (Bain-5627). Their documented Scottish families differ; neither is Jane. Her estimated 1783 birth is retained without a structured birthplace.

Research questionsOpen problems, missing bridges and the next records to inspect.0 open

No formal open question is recorded for this person.

Case-file priorities and cautions

Unresolved

Unknown-764117

Find a marriage, immigration, census or death record naming Jane's maiden surname. Do not infer it from the Mitchell surname of her husband's mother.

Sources and provenanceStructured citations and source-quality classifications.3 sources
Technical profile and raw captureDataset metadata, machine dossier and captured WikiTree biography.Advanced

WikiTree profile information

Dataset: ONT_Glasco_2026-08-18T16_05.json · generated 2026-08-20

Machine-readable dossier

WikiTree biography, citations and relationship snapshot

Unknown-764117 was captured 2026-08-20T16:24:57+00:00; WikiTree profile revision 2026-08-20.

Immediate relationship snapshot

RelationshipPersonWikiTree IDDates and places returned
ChildrenWilliam GlasgowGlasgow-19691811-02-11 · Cookstown, County Tyrone, Ireland · 1897-11-25 · Jonesville, Hillsdale, Michigan, United States
ChildrenJohn B Glasgow Jr.Glasgow-19671814-04-15 · Cookstown, County Tyrone, Ireland · 1893-04-22 · Hillsdale, Michigan, United States
SpousesJohn GlasgowGlasgow-19681778-00-00 · County Tyrone, Ireland · 0000-00-00

Profile categories

Estimated_Birth_Date Glasgow Name Study Glasgow_Name_Study

Record-bearing passages

  • Biography Jane's maiden surname and exact origins are unknown. Two biographical sketches published in 1888 identify her as the wife of John Glasgow and the mother of seven children, but disagree about the couple's birthplaces. Portrait and Biographical Album of Hillsdale County, Michigan (Chicago: Chapman Brothers, 1888), p. 395 (https://archive.org/details/portraitbiograph00chpm/page/395/mode/1up); transcription of William Glasgow sketch (https://www.migenweb.org/hillsdale/bios/bios-g.html). Portrait and Biographical Album of Hillsdale County, Michigan (Chicago: Chapman Brothers, 1888), p. 688 (https://archive.org/details/portraitbiograph00chpm/page/688/mode/1up); transcription of John Glasgow sketch (https://www.migenweb.org/hillsdale/bios/bios-g.html).
  • The sketch of her son John B. Glasgow Jr. says that both parents were born in Scotland, Jane about 1783, and moved to County Tyrone after marriage. The sketch of her son William Glasgow instead says that John and Jane were born in County Tyrone to Scottish parents. Both accounts place their children in County Tyrone.
  • The seven children named in William's sketch were Robert, Mary A., William, John, Bessie, James and Margaret. Robert later died in Barry County, Michigan; Mary A. died in Moscow Township; Bessie married William Henry and died in Barry County; James became a merchant in Jackson, Michigan; and Margaret married Samuel Glasgow and died at Auburn, New York.
  • The accounts also differ slightly on migration. William's sketch says John and Jane left Ireland in 1844 and came directly to Fayette Township near Jonesville. John Jr.'s sketch says they came to Jonesville in 1848. Jane was therefore alive in the 1840s, but her death date and place have not been established. Research Notes Jane's profile uses an estimated birth year of about 1783 from John Jr.'s biographical sketch. Her birthplace remains blank because the two same-volume sketches conflict. No maiden surname should be assigned without another record. Sources

Profile source citations

  1. Portrait and Biographical Album of Hillsdale County, Michigan (Chicago: Chapman Brothers, 1888), p. 395 (https://archive.org/details/portraitbiograph00chpm/page/395/mode/1up); transcription of William Glasgow sketch (https://www.migenweb.org/hillsdale/bios/bios-g.html). source link 1 source link 2
  2. Portrait and Biographical Album of Hillsdale County, Michigan (Chicago: Chapman Brothers, 1888), p. 688 (https://archive.org/details/portraitbiograph00chpm/page/688/mode/1up); transcription of John Glasgow sketch (https://www.migenweb.org/hillsdale/bios/bios-g.html). source link 1 source link 2
Full captured biography text
Biography
Jane's maiden surname and exact origins are unknown. Two biographical sketches published in 1888 identify her as the wife of John Glasgow and the mother of seven children, but disagree about the couple's birthplaces. Portrait and Biographical Album of Hillsdale County, Michigan (Chicago: Chapman Brothers, 1888), p. 395 (https://archive.org/details/portraitbiograph00chpm/page/395/mode/1up); transcription of William Glasgow sketch (https://www.migenweb.org/hillsdale/bios/bios-g.html). Portrait and Biographical Album of Hillsdale County, Michigan (Chicago: Chapman Brothers, 1888), p. 688 (https://archive.org/details/portraitbiograph00chpm/page/688/mode/1up); transcription of John Glasgow sketch (https://www.migenweb.org/hillsdale/bios/bios-g.html). 

The sketch of her son John B. Glasgow Jr. says that both parents were born in Scotland, Jane about 1783, and moved to County Tyrone after marriage. The sketch of her son William Glasgow instead says that John and Jane were born in County Tyrone to Scottish parents. Both accounts place their children in County Tyrone. 

The seven children named in William's sketch were Robert, Mary A., William, John, Bessie, James and Margaret. Robert later died in Barry County, Michigan; Mary A. died in Moscow Township; Bessie married William Henry and died in Barry County; James became a merchant in Jackson, Michigan; and Margaret married Samuel Glasgow and died at Auburn, New York. 

The accounts also differ slightly on migration. William's sketch says John and Jane left Ireland in 1844 and came directly to Fayette Township near Jonesville. John Jr.'s sketch says they came to Jonesville in 1848. Jane was therefore alive in the 1840s, but her death date and place have not been established. 
Research Notes
Jane's profile uses an estimated birth year of about 1783 from John Jr.'s biographical sketch. Her birthplace remains blank because the two same-volume sketches conflict. No maiden surname should be assigned without another record.
Sources
Raw WikiTree biography markup
{{Estimated Date}}
[[Category:Glasgow Name Study]]

== Biography ==

Jane's maiden surname and exact origins are unknown. Two biographical sketches published in 1888 identify her as the wife of [[Glasgow-1968|John Glasgow]] and the mother of seven children, but disagree about the couple's birthplaces.<ref name="HillsdaleWilliam">''Portrait and Biographical Album of Hillsdale County, Michigan'' (Chicago: Chapman Brothers, 1888), [https://archive.org/details/portraitbiograph00chpm/page/395/mode/1up p. 395]; [https://www.migenweb.org/hillsdale/bios/bios-g.html transcription of William Glasgow sketch].</ref><ref name="HillsdaleJohn">''Portrait and Biographical Album of Hillsdale County, Michigan'' (Chicago: Chapman Brothers, 1888), [https://archive.org/details/portraitbiograph00chpm/page/688/mode/1up p. 688]; [https://www.migenweb.org/hillsdale/bios/bios-g.html transcription of John Glasgow sketch].</ref>

The sketch of her son [[Glasgow-1967|John B. Glasgow Jr.]] says that both parents were born in Scotland, Jane about 1783, and moved to County Tyrone after marriage. The sketch of her son [[Glasgow-1969|William Glasgow]] instead says that John and Jane were born in County Tyrone to Scottish parents. Both accounts place their children in County Tyrone.<ref name="HillsdaleWilliam" /><ref name="HillsdaleJohn" />

The seven children named in William's sketch were Robert, Mary A., William, John, Bessie, James and Margaret. Robert later died in Barry County, Michigan; Mary A. died in Moscow Township; Bessie married William Henry and died in Barry County; James became a merchant in Jackson, Michigan; and Margaret married Samuel Glasgow and died at Auburn, New York.<ref name="HillsdaleWilliam" />

The accounts also differ slightly on migration. William's sketch says John and Jane left Ireland in 1844 and came directly to Fayette Township near Jonesville. John Jr.'s sketch says they came to Jonesville in 1848. Jane was therefore alive in the 1840s, but her death date and place have not been established.<ref name="HillsdaleWilliam" /><ref name="HillsdaleJohn" />

== Research Notes ==

Jane's profile uses an estimated birth year of about 1783 from John Jr.'s biographical sketch. Her birthplace remains blank because the two same-volume sketches conflict. No maiden surname should be assigned without another record.

== Sources ==
<references />