The named participants here are administering an estate. The enlarged words help separate personal names from procedural language in a dense court hand. Read the action and office alongside each name: neither an appearance in court nor a caution obligation establishes family membership.
NameRelationship / roleUncertain
New to secretary hand? Start with the shapes.
Follow the writing line. Ascenders rise above small letters; descenders fall below them. A neighbouring line can cross the word you are reading.
Count the short strokes. These are called minims. Joined i, m, n and u shapes can be ambiguous; compare a clear repeated word by the same clerk rather than guessing from a modern alphabet.
Separate reading from expansion. A contraction is not a fully written modern word. Square brackets retain doubtful letters or editorial additions. A familiar legal formula is a clue, not permission to fill a gap.
Then assess the relationship. Reading a name securely is not the same as proving kinship. Look for the actual role words and who they refer to.
Choose a name or relationship below. Compare the original ink, a paper-free view and the same spelling in a secretary-hand teaching font. Open the reasoning only when you need it.
01Alexr: recognise an abbreviation without inventing the omitted lettersAlexr: recognise an abbreviation without inventing the omitted lettersInspect reading
Proposed readingAlexr
The forename repeats in the estate proceedings. The maintained reading is Alexr Broun, not George Broun. Compare the compact ending with the alphabet while keeping the distinction between what is written and what the abbreviation expands to.
01 Original word Untouched manuscript02 Ink on white Derived from the original pixels
Open the original above if this browser cannot process the image.
03 Same spelling, another hand Joscelyn teaching font
AlexrLoading the secretary-hand teaching font...
Alexr
The white-background view suppresses paper colour; reviewed focus boundaries exclude separable neighbouring fragments where available. It does not restore missing strokes. Colour follows retained source pixels inside proposed letter groups, not a reconstructed pen path. Ambiguous crossings remain neutral where reviewed; other crossing ink may still belong to another line.
The font repeats the proposed spelling, not this clerk's handwriting. Similarity is a teaching aid, not confirmation; uncertainties remain in the reading above.
Locate the word in its passage Original contextThe forename repeats in the estate proceedings. The maintained reading is Alexr Broun, not George Broun. Compare the compact ending with the alphabet while keeping the distinction between what is written and what the abbreviation expands to.Reading, meaning and uncertainty
Expansion: Alexander
Confidence: High from the repeated administrator name; the expansion is not a literal transcription of extra ink.
Evidence boundary: Alexander Brown and John Neilson are administrators. Their offices are explicit; neither this abbreviation nor appointment as executor proves kinship to William Glasgow.
... Compeirit personallie ... / Alexr broun and Jon neilsone ... / [following production wording unresolved] ...
In modern English
Alexander Brown and John Neilson appear personally in the estate proceeding as the executors dative; the following production wording is not securely resolved in this crop.
How to read it
The two names occupy the line immediately below Compeirit personallie. Their capitals and descending g/J strokes distinguish the names from the tighter procedural script around them. The next line appears to continue an act of production, but the words previously rendered particular Inventar are not secure enough to quote or box. Neither highlighted name is accompanied here by son, brother or another family term.
What this establishes
Alexander Brown and John Neilson are the executors dative and participate in the estate's formal inventory administration.
What it does not establish
Their participation does not identify either man as William Glasgow's relative or establish William's family.
High for the two names and their appearance in the proceeding; low for the unboxed production wording.
Slow reading
Inspect the words, not just the conclusion.
Compare the original strokes with the proposed reading. Tall or trailing strokes from neighbouring lines may enter a sample; the notes distinguish what is visible from what remains uncertain.
Phrase 01
Alexr broun
Alexander Brown
Magnified from the same manuscript image. No letters have been redrawn.
Look at the strokes
George opens with a large looped G that stands above the smaller following letters.
The second g drops below the baseline in a narrow loop.
Alexr is the clerk's abbreviated Alexander; its opening and final raised r recur in the executor line on the adjacent image.
Broun begins with a tall b ascender and continues as a compact r-o-u-n sequence.
A clear word space separates the forename and surname.
Reading limits: Alexr is an abbreviation expanded as Alexander, and Broun is normalized as Brown. The prior George reading is superseded by the repeated form.
Phrase 02
Jon neilsone
John Neilson
Magnified from the same manuscript image. No letters have been redrawn.
Look at the strokes
The capital J has a long dark descender below the rest of the name.
The short on completes the abbreviated Scots forename without a written h.
Neilsone contains a tall l among lower connected letters and ends in a light open e.
The surname's compact minims contrast with the prominent initial J.
Reading limits: Jon and neilsone are literal; John Neilson is the normalized personal name.
02
National Records of Scotland, CC14/5/9, image 26; Crown copyright
2. A cautioner provides security
Click the manuscript to enlarge
Choose a phrase to locate it in the manuscript. Only its outline is shown, so overlapping strokes stay readable.
... fand Williame neilsone / in biggar cautioner ...
In modern English
William Neilson in Biggar is provided as cautioner.
How to read it
The name ends one line, while in biggar cautioner begins the next. The long descenders in the name and the two g letters in biggar must be retained when the words are enlarged. Cautioner is the operative role word: the surrounding clause concerns security for proper accounting. It describes a legal obligation, not a family relationship.
What this establishes
William Neilson of Biggar serves as cautioner for the administration.
What it does not establish
The shared Neilson surname does not prove a relationship to John Neilson, and caution does not make William Neilson kin to the deceased.
High for the name, Biggar and cautioner designation.
Slow reading
Inspect the words, not just the conclusion.
Compare the original strokes with the proposed reading. Tall or trailing strokes from neighbouring lines may enter a sample; the notes distinguish what is visible from what remains uncertain.
Phrase 01
Williame neilsone
William Neilson
Magnified from the same manuscript image. No letters have been redrawn.
Look at the strokes
Williame begins with a broad angular W and a close sequence of i-l-l minims.
The final e of the forename is small and lightly joined before the word space.
Neilsone has a tall l rising above the surrounding letters and a compact son group.
The last e runs toward the page edge in a fine terminal stroke.
Compare in this hand: The spelling and letter pattern of neilsone can be compared with Jon neilsone in the administrators step.
Reading limits: The normalized name is William Neilson; the shared surname alone does not prove a relationship to John Neilson.
Phrase 02
in biggar cautioner
in Biggar, cautioner or legal surety
Magnified from the same manuscript image. No letters have been redrawn.
Look at the strokes
The short in is followed by a clear word space before the place-name.
Both g letters in biggar have long loops descending beneath the baseline.
Cautioner begins with an open capital-like c and contains a tall crossed t.
The terminal er is compressed into a light upward-and-right stroke.
Reading limits: Cautioner is a legal-security role; the phrase does not state kinship or prove that Biggar was William Neilson's birthplace.
Full case analysisInterpretation, supporting evidence, changed readings and remaining questions.
Modern interpretation
What the record says
This is William Glasgow's Lanark Commissary Court testament dative and inventory. The manuscript locality and death month remain obscured; Quothquan comes from the maintained index-based identification rather than a fresh reading of the gutter.
Alexander Brown and John Neilson are repeatedly named as executors dative and personally appear to produce and swear the inventory.
William Neilson in Biggar is the cautioner or surety. A shared surname does not prove that he was related to John Neilson, and none of these offices proves kinship to William Glasgow.
No spouse, parent, child, or sibling is securely named in the supplied entry.
Evidence and limits
What it establishes
Genuinely corrected reading: the first executor is Alexr (Alexander) Broun, not George Broun. The name repeats on images 25 and 26.
Confirmed: Jon Neilsone (John Neilson) is Alexander Brown's co-executor dative; both appear personally in the estate proceeding.
Confirmed: William Neilson in Biggar is cautioner, not a stated relative.
Unresolved: the opening locality, death month/year wording, names in the initial appointment formula, several account parties, and the presiding official's full name/title.
No direct kinship or new bridge to another Glasgow family is supplied by the testament.
What changed in this reading
Corrected every 'George Brown' conclusion to Alexander Brown from the repeated literal abbreviation 'Alexr Broun'.
Retained John Neilson as co-executor and William Neilson as cautioner; their administrative roles remain separate from family evidence.
Consolidated william-lanark-1673 as a duplicate alias rather than an independent case.
Preserved Glasgow-3912 as the maintained index-based identification while stating that Quothquan is not independently legible in the manuscript gutter.
Still open
Do not fill these gaps with assumptions
William's manuscript locality and exact death month/year
Full giver-up and executor-appointment wording on image 24
The full names and capacities of every official and account party
Crop quantities, debts, rent, totals, and much of the legal formula
Any spouse, parent, child, or sibling of William
Full working transcriptionLine-oriented readings, unresolved text and a downloadable plain-text version.
Square brackets mark uncertainty, editorial expansions or missing text. Ellipses mark omitted or unresolved wording. Numbering identifies lines in this working reading, not official manuscript line numbers. This is not a complete diplomatic edition.
Image / passage NRS image 24
[preceding testament excluded]
The testament dative and Inventar of the goods geir soumes of money and debtis
perteining to umquhile William Glasgow in [locality obscured at gutter]
quha deceisit in the moneth of [illegible] [year wording obscured]
[giver-up and appointment formula; names/capacities partly illegible]
[inventory begins with livestock and crops]
Image / passage NRS image 25
[livestock, crops, household goods, and clothing]
Summa of the Inventar [amount unresolved]
Na debtis awand to the deid
Followes the debtis awand be the deid [creditor/account names partly unresolved]
[confirmation formula naming] Alexr Broun and Jon Neilsone executoris datives
Image / passage NRS image 26
At Lanark the nynt day of Apryle 1673
[commissary/title formula; personal name unresolved]
Compeirit personallie Alexr Broun and Jon Neilsone executoris befoir named
[they produced and swore the inventory; formula partly unresolved]
fand Williame Neilsone in Biggar cautioner
[security and closing formula]
[following Ralph McDougal testament excluded]
Source files and reading provenanceOriginal references, pages examined and the limits of this review.
Source coverage and reading provenance
High for the correction to Alexander Brown, John Neilson as co-executor, William Neilson in Biggar as cautioner, the 9 April 1673 court date, and the absence of a securely read kinship clause. Low for the obscured opening locality/date and several procedural or account names.
The full originals remain in the local research archive. Selected unaltered crops are shown above for reading and commentary, with separate switchable highlights. Image credit: Crown copyright, National Records of Scotland / ScotlandsPeople. Duplicate downloads are not independent evidence. Consult the original using the reference above through ScotlandsPeople.
All associated profiles and identity comparisonsIncludes possible and rejected associations, not just proved relatives.