Skip to page content
Catalogue · 08 Sep 2026

Illustrated manuscript reading

William Glasgow, Lanark testament dative: administrator-name reread

1673-04-09 (court date; death month/year not securely resolved)

National Records of Scotland, Lanark Commissary Court, CC14/5/9, images 24-26

Second manuscript pass · 10 September 2026

The names, reconsidered

New readings and unchanged uncertainties are both recorded. A confirmed name or role does not by itself confirm a WikiTree identity or a relationship.

Read the name and relationship audit (7 findings, not a count of unique people)
Confirmed / reconfirmed

Alexr Broun (Alexander Brown), executor dative

images 25-26, executor and appearance clauses

Earlier reading / question
George Broun
Why this reading
The abbreviated forename repeats with the same letterforms on two pages and reads Alexr, not George.
Effect on the family
Genuinely new correction to an administrator's identity; no kinship to William Glasgow is stated.
Confirmed / reconfirmed

Jon Neilsone (John Neilson), executor dative

images 25-26, executor and appearance clauses

Earlier reading / question
Jon Neilsone read as co-administrator
Why this reading
The name and plural executor wording repeat in the confirmation and personal-appearance clause.
Effect on the family
Administrator only; no family term.
Confirmed / reconfirmed

Williame Neilsone in Biggar, cautioner

image 26, security clause

Earlier reading / question
William Neilson in Biggar read as cautioner
Why this reading
Name, locality, and role are legible across adjacent lines.
Effect on the family
Surety only; shared surname does not prove relationship to John Neilson.
Unresolved

William Glasgow in [locality illegible]

image 24, opening gutter

Earlier reading / question
Quothquan retained from index-based identification
Why this reading
The place is lost in the obscured right gutter.
Effect on the family
The manuscript alone does not place William in Quothquan or connect him to a Quothquan family.
Unresolved

[official/appointment names and capacities illegible]

image 24, initial appointment formula

Earlier reading / question
William [Menzies?] and John [Fleischer?] proposed in procedural text
Why this reading
Gutter loss and compressed script prevent safe full names or roles.
Effect on the family
No kinship or administrator identity should be built from the tentative readings.
Unresolved

[creditor/account names illegible]

image 25, debt/account clauses

Earlier reading / question
Several account-party names unresolved
Why this reading
The surviving strokes do not support complete personal names.
Effect on the family
No additional associate or relative can be placed safely.
Rejected reading or match

Same CC14/5/9 images 24-26 as william-1673

images 24-26, duplicate provenance

Earlier reading / question
william-lanark-1673 stored as a separate short review
Why this reading
Archive reference, image span, and content are identical.
Effect on the family
Do not double-count the person, record, or evidence.

See how the evidence fits the early families

Follow the handwriting

The people behind the words.

The named participants here are administering an estate. The enlarged words help separate personal names from procedural language in a dense court hand. Read the action and office alongside each name: neither an appearance in court nor a caution obligation establishes family membership.

NameRelationship / roleUncertain
New to secretary hand? Start with the shapes.

Follow the writing line. Ascenders rise above small letters; descenders fall below them. A neighbouring line can cross the word you are reading.

Count the short strokes. These are called minims. Joined i, m, n and u shapes can be ambiguous; compare a clear repeated word by the same clerk rather than guessing from a modern alphabet.

Separate reading from expansion. A contraction is not a fully written modern word. Square brackets retain doubtful letters or editorial additions. A familiar legal formula is a clue, not permission to fill a gap.

Then assess the relationship. Reading a name securely is not the same as proving kinship. Look for the actual role words and who they refer to.

Who appears in these passages?

Select a name to jump to its manuscript evidence.

The reading desk

One name. Three ways to look.

Choose a name or relationship below. Compare the original ink, a paper-free view and the same spelling in a secretary-hand teaching font. Open the reasoning only when you need it.

01Alexr: recognise an abbreviation without inventing the omitted lettersAlexr: recognise an abbreviation without inventing the omitted lettersInspect reading

Proposed readingAlexr

The forename repeats in the estate proceedings. The maintained reading is Alexr Broun, not George Broun. Compare the compact ending with the alphabet while keeping the distinction between what is written and what the abbreviation expands to.

01 Original word Untouched manuscript
02 Ink on white Derived from the original pixels

Open the original above if this browser cannot process the image.

03 Same spelling, another hand Joscelyn teaching font
AlexrLoading the secretary-hand teaching font...

Alexr

The white-background view suppresses paper colour; reviewed focus boundaries exclude separable neighbouring fragments where available. It does not restore missing strokes. Colour follows retained source pixels inside proposed letter groups, not a reconstructed pen path. Ambiguous crossings remain neutral where reviewed; other crossing ink may still belong to another line.

The font repeats the proposed spelling, not this clerk's handwriting. Similarity is a teaching aid, not confirmation; uncertainties remain in the reading above.

Locate the word in its passage Original context
The forename repeats in the estate proceedings. The maintained reading is Alexr Broun, not George Broun. Compare the compact ending with the alphabet while keeping the distinction between what is written and what the abbreviation expands to.
Reading, meaning and uncertainty

Expansion: Alexander

Confidence: High from the repeated administrator name; the expansion is not a literal transcription of extra ink.

Evidence boundary: Alexander Brown and John Neilson are administrators. Their offices are explicit; neither this abbreviation nor appointment as executor proves kinship to William Glasgow.

Teaching typeface: Joscelyn by Peter S. Baker, based on a different Renaissance secretary hand. SIL Open Font License. Source images remain separate and unchanged.

National Records of Scotland, CC14/5/9, image 26; Crown copyright

1. Names attached to producing the inventory

1. Names attached to producing the inventory: cropped original manuscript, CC14/5/9, image 26
Click the manuscript to enlarge

Choose a phrase to locate it in the manuscript. Only its outline is shown, so overlapping strokes stay readable.

National Records of Scotland, CC14/5/9, image 26; Crown copyright. Cropped from the supplied original; © Crown copyright, National Records of Scotland / ScotlandsPeople. Coloured boxes are reading aids, not part of the manuscript.

On the page

... Compeirit personallie ... / Alexr broun and Jon neilsone ... / [following production wording unresolved] ...

In modern English

Alexander Brown and John Neilson appear personally in the estate proceeding as the executors dative; the following production wording is not securely resolved in this crop.

How to read it

The two names occupy the line immediately below Compeirit personallie. Their capitals and descending g/J strokes distinguish the names from the tighter procedural script around them. The next line appears to continue an act of production, but the words previously rendered particular Inventar are not secure enough to quote or box. Neither highlighted name is accompanied here by son, brother or another family term.

What this establishes

Alexander Brown and John Neilson are the executors dative and participate in the estate's formal inventory administration.

What it does not establish

Their participation does not identify either man as William Glasgow's relative or establish William's family.

High for the two names and their appearance in the proceeding; low for the unboxed production wording.

Slow reading

Inspect the words, not just the conclusion.

Compare the original strokes with the proposed reading. Tall or trailing strokes from neighbouring lines may enter a sample; the notes distinguish what is visible from what remains uncertain.

Phrase 01

Alexr broun

Alexander Brown

Magnified from the same manuscript image. No letters have been redrawn.
Look at the strokes
  1. George opens with a large looped G that stands above the smaller following letters.
  2. The second g drops below the baseline in a narrow loop.
  3. Alexr is the clerk's abbreviated Alexander; its opening and final raised r recur in the executor line on the adjacent image.
  4. Broun begins with a tall b ascender and continues as a compact r-o-u-n sequence.
  5. A clear word space separates the forename and surname.

Reading limits: Alexr is an abbreviation expanded as Alexander, and Broun is normalized as Brown. The prior George reading is superseded by the repeated form.

Phrase 02

Jon neilsone

John Neilson

Magnified from the same manuscript image. No letters have been redrawn.
Look at the strokes
  1. The capital J has a long dark descender below the rest of the name.
  2. The short on completes the abbreviated Scots forename without a written h.
  3. Neilsone contains a tall l among lower connected letters and ends in a light open e.
  4. The surname's compact minims contrast with the prominent initial J.

Reading limits: Jon and neilsone are literal; John Neilson is the normalized personal name.

National Records of Scotland, CC14/5/9, image 26; Crown copyright

2. A cautioner provides security

2. A cautioner provides security: cropped original manuscript, CC14/5/9, image 26
Click the manuscript to enlarge

Choose a phrase to locate it in the manuscript. Only its outline is shown, so overlapping strokes stay readable.

National Records of Scotland, CC14/5/9, image 26; Crown copyright. Cropped from the supplied original; © Crown copyright, National Records of Scotland / ScotlandsPeople. Coloured boxes are reading aids, not part of the manuscript.

On the page

... fand Williame neilsone / in biggar cautioner ...

In modern English

William Neilson in Biggar is provided as cautioner.

How to read it

The name ends one line, while in biggar cautioner begins the next. The long descenders in the name and the two g letters in biggar must be retained when the words are enlarged. Cautioner is the operative role word: the surrounding clause concerns security for proper accounting. It describes a legal obligation, not a family relationship.

What this establishes

William Neilson of Biggar serves as cautioner for the administration.

What it does not establish

The shared Neilson surname does not prove a relationship to John Neilson, and caution does not make William Neilson kin to the deceased.

High for the name, Biggar and cautioner designation.

Slow reading

Inspect the words, not just the conclusion.

Compare the original strokes with the proposed reading. Tall or trailing strokes from neighbouring lines may enter a sample; the notes distinguish what is visible from what remains uncertain.

Phrase 01

Williame neilsone

William Neilson

Magnified from the same manuscript image. No letters have been redrawn.
Look at the strokes
  1. Williame begins with a broad angular W and a close sequence of i-l-l minims.
  2. The final e of the forename is small and lightly joined before the word space.
  3. Neilsone has a tall l rising above the surrounding letters and a compact son group.
  4. The last e runs toward the page edge in a fine terminal stroke.

Compare in this hand: The spelling and letter pattern of neilsone can be compared with Jon neilsone in the administrators step.

Reading limits: The normalized name is William Neilson; the shared surname alone does not prove a relationship to John Neilson.

Phrase 02

in biggar cautioner

in Biggar, cautioner or legal surety

Magnified from the same manuscript image. No letters have been redrawn.
Look at the strokes
  1. The short in is followed by a clear word space before the place-name.
  2. Both g letters in biggar have long loops descending beneath the baseline.
  3. Cautioner begins with an open capital-like c and contains a tall crossed t.
  4. The terminal er is compressed into a light upward-and-right stroke.

Reading limits: Cautioner is a legal-security role; the phrase does not state kinship or prove that Biggar was William Neilson's birthplace.

Manuscript detail

Full case analysisInterpretation, supporting evidence, changed readings and remaining questions.

Modern interpretation

What the record says

This is William Glasgow's Lanark Commissary Court testament dative and inventory. The manuscript locality and death month remain obscured; Quothquan comes from the maintained index-based identification rather than a fresh reading of the gutter.

Alexander Brown and John Neilson are repeatedly named as executors dative and personally appear to produce and swear the inventory.

William Neilson in Biggar is the cautioner or surety. A shared surname does not prove that he was related to John Neilson, and none of these offices proves kinship to William Glasgow.

No spouse, parent, child, or sibling is securely named in the supplied entry.

Evidence and limits

What it establishes

  • Genuinely corrected reading: the first executor is Alexr (Alexander) Broun, not George Broun. The name repeats on images 25 and 26.
  • Confirmed: Jon Neilsone (John Neilson) is Alexander Brown's co-executor dative; both appear personally in the estate proceeding.
  • Confirmed: William Neilson in Biggar is cautioner, not a stated relative.
  • Unresolved: the opening locality, death month/year wording, names in the initial appointment formula, several account parties, and the presiding official's full name/title.
  • No direct kinship or new bridge to another Glasgow family is supplied by the testament.

What changed in this reading

  • Corrected every 'George Brown' conclusion to Alexander Brown from the repeated literal abbreviation 'Alexr Broun'.
  • Retained John Neilson as co-executor and William Neilson as cautioner; their administrative roles remain separate from family evidence.
  • Consolidated william-lanark-1673 as a duplicate alias rather than an independent case.
  • Preserved Glasgow-3912 as the maintained index-based identification while stating that Quothquan is not independently legible in the manuscript gutter.

Still open

Do not fill these gaps with assumptions

  • William's manuscript locality and exact death month/year
  • Full giver-up and executor-appointment wording on image 24
  • The full names and capacities of every official and account party
  • Crop quantities, debts, rent, totals, and much of the legal formula
  • Any spouse, parent, child, or sibling of William
Full working transcriptionLine-oriented readings, unresolved text and a downloadable plain-text version.

LLM-assisted working transcription

Read the manuscript passages

Download text

Square brackets mark uncertainty, editorial expansions or missing text. Ellipses mark omitted or unresolved wording. Numbering identifies lines in this working reading, not official manuscript line numbers. This is not a complete diplomatic edition.

Image / passage NRS image 24

  1. [preceding testament excluded]
  2. The testament dative and Inventar of the goods geir soumes of money and debtis
  3. perteining to umquhile William Glasgow in [locality obscured at gutter]
  4. quha deceisit in the moneth of [illegible] [year wording obscured]
  5. [giver-up and appointment formula; names/capacities partly illegible]
  6. [inventory begins with livestock and crops]

Image / passage NRS image 25

  1. [livestock, crops, household goods, and clothing]
  2. Summa of the Inventar [amount unresolved]
  3. Na debtis awand to the deid
  4. Followes the debtis awand be the deid [creditor/account names partly unresolved]
  5. [confirmation formula naming] Alexr Broun and Jon Neilsone executoris datives

Image / passage NRS image 26

  1. At Lanark the nynt day of Apryle 1673
  2. [commissary/title formula; personal name unresolved]
  3. Compeirit personallie Alexr Broun and Jon Neilsone executoris befoir named
  4. [they produced and swore the inventory; formula partly unresolved]
  5. fand Williame Neilsone in Biggar cautioner
  6. [security and closing formula]
  7. [following Ralph McDougal testament excluded]
Source files and reading provenanceOriginal references, pages examined and the limits of this review.

Source coverage and reading provenance

High for the correction to Alexander Brown, John Neilson as co-executor, William Neilson in Biggar as cautioner, the 9 April 1673 court date, and the absence of a securely read kinship clause. Low for the obscured opening locality/date and several procedural or account names.

Reviewed: 2026-09-10. Method: Codex fresh original-image name, role, and locality audit.

Pages examined

  • PDF page 1 / NRS image 24
  • PDF page 2 / NRS image 25
  • PDF page 3 / NRS image 26

Supplied local source files

  • 1673_William.pdf
  • ScotlandsPeople_CC001400005-00009-00024-.pdf

The full originals remain in the local research archive. Selected unaltered crops are shown above for reading and commentary, with separate switchable highlights. Image credit: Crown copyright, National Records of Scotland / ScotlandsPeople. Duplicate downloads are not independent evidence. Consult the original using the reference above through ScotlandsPeople.

All associated profiles and identity comparisonsIncludes possible and rejected associations, not just proved relatives.

Back to all transcriptions

Your research notebook.

Select 2 people to compare their evidence.