Glasgow Surname Project

Individual research record

Alexander Glasgow

1650 – ?

Glasgow-3118 · 1 mapped association

Kirknewton and East Calder, Midlothian, Scotland→Death place unknown
View on mapOpen WikiTreeCompareReport a correction

At a glance

Identity & family

Tree links organise the family; documentary status still varies.

1Mapped records
5Close relations
2Evidence items
12Candidate leads
Birth
1650 · Kirknewton and East Calder, Midlothian, Scotland
Death
Not recorded · Place not recorded
Parents
John Glasgowuncertain
Spouses
Margaret Glasgow Smith
Children
Agnes GlasgowAlexander GlasgowAndrew Glasgow
Gender
Male
WikiTree
Glasgow-3118
Research clusters
Scotland One-Tree profile leads
Mapped descendants
114

Comparison context

These child positions and checks are the subject details used to rank possible parents below.

Naming sequence used by the parentage model

Paternal grandfather positionAlexander Glasgow (1673)
Maternal grandfather positionNot identifiable from dated child profiles
Maternal grandmother positionAgnes Glasgow (1677)
Paternal grandmother positionNot identifiable from dated child profiles

Known-position checks: 0 support · 0 conflict. Ordinals retain unnamed children and recognise reused names.

Relationship comparison

Potential parents or duplicates

Compare scored leads with the subject details above—not proof.

Higher-signal leadReview carefullyWeak lead

Possible fathers5 leads

Automated fit52/100
Moderate Lead
Dates1616–?Generationat least 34 years age gapRecorded placesMid Calder, Midlothian, Scotland · Mid CalderIndependent clue breadth · 9Age · Indirect Multi-Factor Convergence · Local Sibling Birth · Rare Branch-Name Recurrence · Rare Name Bundle · Spouse · Spouse-Specific Child Window · Two-Generation · Undated LocalitySame-spouse child windowIssobell (Porteous) GlasgowCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • known spouse Issobell (Porteous) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (33) at the subject's birth (+7)
  • candidate has only broad or undated birth-locality overlap: calder (+6)
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming

a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving)

Show complete scoring
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at least 34 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
  • candidate's birth is 57 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1673), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • candidate has only broad or undated birth-locality overlap: calder (+6)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1643–1652) (+6; other parent Issobell (Porteous) Glasgow)
  • candidate has another child, Anne Glasgow, born 2 years from the subject in the same specific birth locality (+6; possible sibling-household clue)
  • known spouse Issobell (Porteous) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (33) at the subject's birth (+7)
  • uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Agnes +5 (46 public profiles; subject branch: Agnes Glasgow; candidate branch: Agnes Glasgow, Agnes Glasgow; +2 repetition bonus); Jean +5 (42 public profiles; subject branch: Jean Glasgow, Jean Glasgow; candidate branch: Jean Glasgow; +2 repetition bonus) (+14 total including +4 multi-name bonus)
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming

Deductions and cautions: a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving)

Automated fit39/100
Weak Lead
Dates1626–1664Generation24 years age gapRecorded placesAyrshire, Scotland · Kilwinning, Ayrshire, Scotland · Ayrshire — exact locality unprovedIndependent clue breadth · 7Age · Household · Indirect Multi-Factor Convergence · Rare Branch-Name Recurrence · Rare Name Bundle · Repeated Marriage Surnames · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 24-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): collateral network, household chronology, naming
  • candidate's birth is 47 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1673), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)

a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10); descendant-name recurrence has no independent household, record, migration or specific-locality anchor (score capped at 39)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 24-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 47 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1673), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • a known child was born within 2 years of the subject (+3)
  • uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Marion +10 (23 public profiles; subject branch: Marion Glasgow; candidate branch: Marion Glasgow, Marion Glasgow; +2 repetition bonus); Jean +9 (42 public profiles; subject branch: Jean Glasgow, Jean Glasgow; candidate branch: Jean Glasgow, Jean Glasgow; +6 repetition bonus); Alexander +7 (59 public profiles; subject branch: Alexander Glasgow, Alexander Glasgow; candidate branch: Alexander Glasgow; +4 repetition bonus) (+34 total including +8 multi-name bonus)
  • uncommon spouse surnames recur across the subject and candidate branches: Cunningham +4 (+4 total)
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): collateral network, household chronology, naming

Deductions and cautions: a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10); descendant-name recurrence has no independent household, record, migration or specific-locality anchor (score capped at 39)

Show 3 lower-scoring possible fathers
Automated fit39/100
Weak Lead
Dates1620–?Generation30 years age gapRecorded placesInveresk and Musselburgh, Midlothian, Scotland · Musselburgh / InvereskIndependent clue breadth · 9Age · Contemporaneous Household Conflict · Household · Indirect Multi-Factor Convergence · Mapped Proximity · Rare Branch-Name Recurrence · Rare Name Bundle · Spouse · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 30-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • known spouse Bessie (Whyte) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (19) at the subject's birth (+7)
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming

a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); candidate's household recorded Helen Glasgow in Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland within 1 years of the subject (−12; no contemporaneous child is indexed in the subject's locality); descendant-name recurrence has no independent household, record, migration or specific-locality anchor (score capped at 39)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 30-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 53 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1673), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • mapped Musselburgh / Inveresk is 23.6 km from the subject's birth-period Kirknewton — West Lothian (+1; one or both placements are unproved)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • a known child was born within 1 years of the subject (+3)
  • known spouse Bessie (Whyte) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (19) at the subject's birth (+7)
  • uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Katherine +12 (8 public profiles; subject branch: Katherine (Glasgow) Nicol; candidate branch: Katherine Glasgow); Marion +8 (23 public profiles; subject branch: Marion Glasgow; candidate branch: Marion Glasgow); Andrew +7 (31 public profiles; subject branch: Andrew Glasgow, Andrew Glasgow; candidate branch: Andrew Glasgow; +4 repetition bonus) (+35 total including +8 multi-name bonus)
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming

Deductions and cautions: a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); candidate's household recorded Helen Glasgow in Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland within 1 years of the subject (−12; no contemporaneous child is indexed in the subject's locality); descendant-name recurrence has no independent household, record, migration or specific-locality anchor (score capped at 39)

Automated fit30/100
Weak Lead
Dates1600–?Generation50 years age gapRecorded placesAyrshire, Scotland · Ayrshire — exact locality unprovedIndependent clue breadth · 6Age · Indirect Multi-Factor Convergence · Rare Branch-Name Recurrence · Rare Name Bundle · Repeated Marriage Surnames · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • possible 50-year parent-child age gap (+10)
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): collateral network, household chronology, naming
  • candidate's birth is 73 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1673), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)

a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Show complete scoring
  • possible 50-year parent-child age gap (+10)
  • candidate's birth is 73 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1673), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Alexander +7 (59 public profiles; subject branch: Alexander Glasgow, Alexander Glasgow; candidate branch: Alexander Glasgow; +4 repetition bonus); Jean +5 (42 public profiles; subject branch: Jean Glasgow, Jean Glasgow; candidate branch: Jean Glasgow; +2 repetition bonus); Janet +3 (43 public profiles; subject branch: Janet Glasgow; candidate branch: Janet Glasgow) (+23 total including +8 multi-name bonus)
  • uncommon spouse surnames recur across the subject and candidate branches: Cunningham +4 (+4 total)
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): collateral network, household chronology, naming

Deductions and cautions: a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Automated fit28/100
Weak Lead
Dates1603–1700Generationat least 47 years age gapRecorded placesInveresk and Musselburgh, Midlothian, Scotland · Musselburgh / InvereskIndependent clue breadth · 7Age · Indirect Multi-Factor Convergence · Mapped Proximity · Same-Sex Generational Naming · Sex-Aware Ordered Naming · Spouse · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming
  • candidate's birth is 70 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1673), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • known spouse Jannet (Clerk) Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (40) at the subject's birth (+3)

a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving)

Show complete scoring
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at least 47 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
  • candidate's birth is 70 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1673), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • mapped Musselburgh / Inveresk is 23.6 km from the subject's birth-period Kirknewton — West Lothian (+1; one or both placements are unproved)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • known spouse Jannet (Clerk) Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (40) at the subject's birth (+3)
  • candidate and subject share the given name Alexander (+5; weak direct parent-child name recurrence, 59 public profiles)
  • candidate's name matches the first dated son Alexander Glasgow, the expected father position for a male subject (+6; catalogue rarity 1, Alexander in 59 profiles)
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming

Deductions and cautions: a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving)

Possible mothers5 leads

Automated fit39/100
Weak Lead
Dates1632–?Generation18 years age gapRecorded placesMusselburgh / InvereskIndependent clue breadth · 7Age · Child Naming · Contemporaneous Household Conflict · Household · Rare Branch-Name Recurrence · Rare Name Bundle · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 18-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 41 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1673), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • a known child was born within 5 years of the subject (+1)

locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction); candidate's household recorded Robert Glasgow in Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland within 5 years of the subject (−12; no contemporaneous child is indexed in the subject's locality); descendant-name recurrence has no independent household, record, migration or specific-locality anchor (score capped at 39)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 18-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 41 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1673), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • a known child was born within 5 years of the subject (+1)
  • candidate's given name recurs among another recorded child (+1; Agnes occurs in 46 public profiles)
  • uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Katherine +12 (8 public profiles; subject branch: Katherine (Glasgow) Nicol; candidate branch: Katherine Glasgow); Marion +8 (23 public profiles; subject branch: Marion Glasgow; candidate branch: Marion Glasgow); Andrew +7 (31 public profiles; subject branch: Andrew Glasgow, Andrew Glasgow; candidate branch: Andrew Glasgow; +4 repetition bonus) (+35 total including +8 multi-name bonus)

Deductions and cautions: locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction); candidate's household recorded Robert Glasgow in Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland within 5 years of the subject (−12; no contemporaneous child is indexed in the subject's locality); descendant-name recurrence has no independent household, record, migration or specific-locality anchor (score capped at 39)

Automated fit35/100
Weak Lead
Dates1617–?Generation33 years age gapRecorded placesEdinburghIndependent clue breadth · 5Age · Local Sibling Birth · Mapped Proximity · Spouse-Specific Child Window · Two-GenerationSame-spouse child windowJohn GlasgowCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 33-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 56 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1673), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • mapped Edinburgh is 16.2 km from the subject's birth-period Kirknewton — West Lothian (+1; one or both placements are unproved)

No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 33-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 56 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1673), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • mapped Edinburgh is 16.2 km from the subject's birth-period Kirknewton — West Lothian (+1; one or both placements are unproved)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1643–1652) (+6; other parent John Glasgow)
  • candidate has another child, Anne Glasgow, born 2 years from the subject in the same specific birth locality (+6; possible sibling-household clue)

Deductions and cautions: No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required

Show 3 lower-scoring possible mothers
Automated fit29/100
Weak Lead
Dates1630–?Generation20 years age gapRecorded placesInveresk With Musselburgh, Midlothian, Scotland · Musselburgh / InvereskIndependent clue breadth · 5Age · Great-Grandparent Name Echo · Indirect Multi-Factor Convergence · Mapped Proximity · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 20-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming
  • candidate's birth is 43 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1673), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)

No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 20-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 43 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1673), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • mapped Musselburgh / Inveresk is 23.6 km from the subject's birth-period Kirknewton — West Lothian (+1; one or both placements are unproved)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • candidate's parents' names recur among the subject's grandchildren: Alexander +1 (+1 total; weak multigeneration clue)
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming

Deductions and cautions: No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required

Automated fit29/100
Weak Lead
Dates1618–?Generation32 years age gapRecorded placesMusselburgh, Lothian, Scotland · Musselburgh / InvereskIndependent clue breadth · 5Age · Child Naming · Indirect Multi-Factor Convergence · Mapped Proximity · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 32-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming
  • candidate's birth is 55 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1673), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)

No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 32-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 55 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1673), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • mapped Musselburgh / Inveresk is 23.6 km from the subject's birth-period Kirknewton — West Lothian (+1; one or both placements are unproved)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • candidate's given name recurs among another recorded child (+1; Agnes occurs in 46 public profiles)
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming

Deductions and cautions: No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required

Automated fit18/100
Weak Lead
Dates1635–1700Generation15 years age gapRecorded placesInveresk, Midlothian, Scotland · InvereskIndependent clue breadth · 5Age · Great-Grandparent Name Echo · Indirect Multi-Factor Convergence · Mapped Proximity · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • possible 15-year parent-child age gap (+10)
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming
  • candidate's birth is 38 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1673), a marginal two-generation interval (+1)

No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required

Show complete scoring
  • possible 15-year parent-child age gap (+10)
  • candidate's birth is 38 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1673), a marginal two-generation interval (+1)
  • mapped Inveresk is 23.6 km from the subject's birth-period Kirknewton — West Lothian (+1; one or both placements are unproved)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • candidate's parents' names recur among the subject's grandchildren: Alexander +1 (+1 total; weak multigeneration clue)
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming

Deductions and cautions: No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required

How parent leads are calculated

Automated leads use birth surnames—not married surnames—as parental eligibility, role-specific biological age limits, bounded and approximate-date uncertainty, household chronology, specific time-aware localities, mapped distance, tenancy succession, migration destinations and sex-aware Scottish naming positions across generations. People already attached as the subject's parents stay in the identity summary and are excluded from this alternative-candidate list, regardless of relationship confidence. The main calibration uses clues available on disconnected profiles; existing parent and sibling links are retained as comparison context rather than treated as transferable evidence. Common ordered names and grandparent-to-child echoes receive a small non-zero weight, so a John or James match can support several independent criteria without producing a lead alone. Rare names, repeated bearers and bundles across otherwise distinct branches receive substantially more weight according to catalogue frequency. An exact migration place is weighted by its rarity and repetition across both branches; a shared destination country is worth only one point. Extra weight is added only when at least three independent clue types converge: naming, locality, specific migration, household chronology or collateral networks. Sparse profiles retain a clearly labelled chronology-only fallback instead of disappearing. Countries, states, counties and research clusters do not count as a shared locality, and fallback, broad representative or kin-inferred coordinates are excluded from distance scoring. Shared descendant profiles are removed before branch-name comparison. A candidate already recorded as a parent-in-law is excluded. A confident or independently supported parent is treated as settled; uncertain and unassessed attachments remain open to alternative comparison. A different linked parent, an uncle/aunt or grandparent path, and a matching existing child profile prevent an alternative from being classified as a strong direct-parent lead until the underlying tree conflict or duplicate is resolved. Familiar forms such as Bessie are normalised. Surname remains an eligibility filter worth zero points.

Naming customs, shared farms and occupations are circumstantial. Children, spouses and collateral relatives may be missing, and tree-derived family networks are not independent evidence. Scores rank research leads; they do not prove parentage.

Automated fit40/100
Similar Person
Dates1703–?PlacesKirknewton, Linlithgowshire, ScotlandParent comparisonNo shared parent is indexed
Why it may fit
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • shared recorded place (+20)
  • child given-name pattern overlaps: Alexander

record-derived birth estimates differ by 53; retained without deduction

Full comparison detail
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • shared recorded place (+20)
  • child given-name pattern overlaps: Alexander

Conflicts: record-derived birth estimates differ by 53; retained without deduction

Open side-by-side comparison
Automated fit28/100
Similar Person
Dates1659–?PlacesCampbeltown, Argyll, ScotlandParent comparisonNo shared parent is indexed
Why it may fit
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 9 (+10)

uncertain father attachments differ (no deduction)

Full comparison detail
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 9 (+10)

Conflicts: uncertain father attachments differ (no deduction)

Open side-by-side comparison
How duplicate leads are calculated

Dates are eligibility gates, not merely deductions: chronologically impossible people are excluded. Dates, places, spouses, parent certainty and children's profiles and names are then compared. A high score is a prompt to inspect records, not a merge recommendation.

Open only what you need

Research & records

Latest case researchThe current conclusion from the durable research case file.Updated

Current conclusion

Glasgow-3118

James Glasgow (Glasgow-1150) cannot be ruled out biologically, but the automated score materially overstates the case. James married Bessie Whyte at Edinburgh on 6 July 1649 and their known children begin there in 1651. Alexander's 1650 Kirknewton birth is an estimate derived from a 1667 marriage record; no record names James as his father, and a different father is currently attached uncertainly.

Life and record timelineChronological mapped occurrences and their underlying sources.1 record
b. 1650

Profile-stated birthplace: Kirknewton and East Calder, Midlothian, Scotland

Kirknewton — West Lothian

One-Tree export profile fields are search leads, not sources; relationships are shown only where the export supplies parent links.

One-Tree profile leadunknown
Source and mapping detail

WikiTree profile export for Glasgow-3118

No sufficiently specific citation match found.

Precision: Settlement/parish centrepoint

Case-file source findingsSource extracts and analysis regenerated from findings.md.1 section(s)
Evidence assessmentWhat is supported, uncertain or disputed in the current case model.8 claims
1Derivative
1Tree Only

Documented or strongly supported

No claims in this category have been formally assessed.

Working hypotheses and conflicts

No claims in this category have been formally assessed.

Research questionsOpen problems, missing bridges and the next records to inspect.0 open

No formal open question is recorded for this person.

Case-file priorities and cautions

Recommended action

Glasgow-3118

Retain as a weak household comparison only. Do not promote on descendant names without an original baptism, testament or same-parish household record.

Sources and provenanceStructured citations and source-quality classifications.2 sources

Source or provenance: quality describes the record layer, not every conclusion drawn from it.

  1. derivative "Scotland Marriages, 1561-1910", , FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:XY9W-TPB : 11 February 2020), Alexander Glasgow, 1667.
  2. tree_only WikiTree profile export for Glasgow-3118
Technical profile and raw captureDataset metadata, machine dossier and captured WikiTree biography.Advanced

WikiTree profile information

Dataset: ONT_Glasco_2026-08-18T16_05.json · generated 2026-08-20

Machine-readable dossier

WikiTree biography, citations and relationship snapshot

Glasgow-3118 was captured 2026-08-11T11:27:28+00:00; WikiTree profile revision 2026-08-10.

Profile location claims

EventDateLocationStatus
birth—Kirknewton and East Calder, Midlothian, ScotlandWikiTree profile field
marriage1667-10-18Kirknewton, Linlithgowshire, ScotlandWikiTree relationship field

Immediate relationship snapshot

RelationshipPersonWikiTree IDDates and places returned
ParentsJohn GlasgowGlasgow-36101626-02-18 · Kirknewton and East Calder, Midlothian, Scotland. · 0000-00-00
ChildrenAlexander GlasgowGlasgow-13141673-07-07 · Kirknewton, Linlithgowshire, Scotland · 0000-00-00
ChildrenAgnes GlasgowGlasgow-13121677-02-28 · Kirknewton and East Calder, Midlothian, Scotland · 0000-00-00
ChildrenAndrew GlasgowGlasgow-15461685-00-00 · Kirknewton and East Calder, Midlothian, Scotland · 0000-00-00
SiblingsMargaret GlasgowGlasgow-31121646-11-11 · Kirknewton and East Calder, Midlothian, Scotland · 0000-00-00
SiblingsJohn GlasgowGlasgow-30121649-04-04 · Kirknewton and East Calder, Midlothian, Scotland · 0000-00-00
SpousesMargaret GlasgowSmith-2305091650-00-00 · 0000-00-00 · 1667-10-18 · Kirknewton, Linlithgowshire, Scotland

Record-bearing passages

Profile source citations

  1. "Scotland Marriages, 1561-1910", , FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:XY9W-TPB : 11 February 2020), Alexander Glasgow, 1667. source link 1
Full captured biography text
Biography
Alexander was born in 1650. 
Sources
* "Scotland Marriages, 1561-1910", , FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:XY9W-TPB : 11 February 2020), Alexander Glasgow, 1667.
Raw WikiTree biography markup
== Biography ==

Alexander was born in 1650. 
== Sources ==
<references />
* "Scotland Marriages, 1561-1910", , FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:XY9W-TPB : 11 February 2020), Alexander Glasgow, 1667.